The coup happened in the sixties. It was successful. Presently they are fighting for information containment.

Yeah but I don't personally believe they would do that unless it's about to hit the fan. That would signal their conversing defeat and most likely they'd go on the attack hardcore. At the moment I believe they're using the infiltration and co-opt tactics.

1960's? Try, 1783... People need to research and look into that shit. I'll give y'all a carrot, Treaty of Paris..

Too far back for my specific yet vague reference. I was talking about the intelligence agencies and corporate coup of government. Not the old gaurd aristocracy.

I was talking about the intelligence agencies and corporate coup of government.

Hence what I said. Look into the Tri-Sovereign States, The City of London, and the Terms actually given to "the Free Colonies"... Happy rabbit hole falling...

Dude, I know you may not be intentionally doing it but you come off very condescending when you send someone looking for stuff. You don't have the monopoly on information or answers and you shouldn't assume another persons answer doesn't take the same info you have into account.

When I say you shouldn't I mean you shouldn't if you actually want to contribute to a discussion. You're adding to the discussion yes, but you're actively not contributing.

Also it is a pretty smug attitude to assume that when someone does follow up on your leads they'll reach the same conclusions as yourself.

You used to be way more informative, what happened?

Stop being such a wimp and look into what I said (if you care to). I don't owe you anything. I am merely giving you something to look into.

You used to be way more informative, what happened?

I gave you something to look into. You asked no questions, and bitch to me? I gave you something. Look into it or don't, it's up to you. This isn't a safe place, and as far as me being "informative". Check my posts. Enough information there to get you started. I'm tired of reposting and repeating myself. Take this however the fuck you want.

Lmao, that escalated quickly. Cool man I tried to handle you in a mature way and you rejected that approach. Instead of slinging mud back at you I'm just going to disengage after this one. Hope you get your positivity back man.

Got anything to add?

So salty. They are right, you are condescending big time.

Do you have the internet by a chance?

No, I'm using smoke signals.

How is that working out? Are you some technology denier or something? I bet you think we haven't gone to the moon!

You're weird dude. Since we are wildly speculating here, I bet you're an angry little guy with mantits.

So just "personal attacks"?

So just "condescending bullshit"?

Huh? Care to explain?

Stop being such a wimp

You need a tampoon?

I don't owe you anything.

Nice convo.. Welp, I'll be off now if you don't have anything else.....

Take this however the fuck you want. I don't owe you anything.

Yup, nothing (what I thought). Let that account Stew, Ishmael. Don't let it get uneven though, bro...

Happy rabbit hole falling..

K.

I gave you something.

No you didn't. Care to reeefresh? Or if you edited, re-link. KTHX.

Stop being such a wimp

Happy rabbit hole falling..

K.

Got anything to add?

You don't, apparently.... Soo, do you? IZ WAIT...

Okay, I'll bite. I read the wiki on Treaty of Paris. In it I discovered what may be a relevant fact, that the Americans bypassed negotiations with France to get a more favorable deal directly from England. But now what? Instead of a coup, it sounds like the US got a better deal in terms of geographic dominance and trade with a once-enemy-now-economic-partner Superpower. Care to throw another carrot?

Tri-Sovereign States (The City of London). Already ready threw it....

While the Treaty of Paris was significant, it was not as significant than this: "1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To" Provide A Government for the District of Columbia."

November 22, 1963. We've been an oligarchy ever since.

So salty. They are right, you are condescending big time.

Lmao, that escalated quickly. Cool man I tried to handle you in a mature way and you rejected that approach. Instead of slinging mud back at you I'm just going to disengage after this one. Hope you get your positivity back man.

K.