Hmmm. first i've heard of OANN, but how could you start a tv station in this day and age and not have a live stream??

http://www.oann.com/wheretowatch/

no streams.

Just like a week ago someone at work was telling me about how they had seen it at a theater. I think the owner of the distribution rights set up some kind of cheap or free license or something just to get it out, because I've seen it all over YouTube too, even though most films showing in theaters aren't up on YouTube in full or airing on TV. Maybe the copies on YouTube are actually bootlegs and the owner just isn't pursuing copyright takedowns because they're glad the information is getting out there?

Either way, yeah, people are seeing this and people are finding out about this stuff. We live in the Information age now, and they can't stop the flow of information no matter how many records they try to correct.

If it is propaganda, then they care not about copyrights. More people who watch it, the better

Calling it propaganda implies that it's factually inaccurate or deceptive somehow.

It's a political documentary. Entirely fact-based and well-researched.

Calling it propaganda implies that it's factually inaccurate or deceptive somehow.

'propaganda' is just a word for deliberate distributed information, the true or false or whatever is another matter. that is 'spin' or 'disinfo' aka lies.

It's deceptive in that, there is an hidden agenda. Propaganda can also mean distractionary information, or selectively telling you just one side of the story. I wager that a lot of the documentary may be true, but be aware, most likely anything that gets that much popularity and airtime has an hidden agenda.

[removed]

open agenda

I wager that a lot of the documentary may be true, but be aware...

So you didn't watch it at all but came here to argue against its credibility? For what reason?

Seen by whom? I've never even heard of the station. What providers even carry it, and how–if at all–do they advertise?

Clinton Cash Crushed By Facts As Author Admits He Has No Evidence Of Clinton Crimes

The Clinton Cash scandal will live on the ozone of right-wing conspiracy theories and conservative media, but there is no evidence to support these claims. ABC News can’t find it. The New York Times can’t find it. The Washington Post can’t find it.

By the end of the interview, Schweizer sounded like a conspiracy theorist, and it was clear that Clinton Cash is the latest in a long line of empty and time wasting right-wing conspiracies.

I think the Hatians know they got fucked. That's why they protested outside the Clinton foundation building and at the DNC.

Ah, a conspiracy theorist! Say no more!

http://www.oann.com/wheretowatch/