Chemtrail denying article on the front page, any thoughts on that?
0 2016-08-14 by 4thdimensionalshift
Most all of the top comments were deleted, personally I'm an avid believer in chemtrails and geoengineering. Seems like typical misinformation on r/science
25 comments
5 Starlifter2 2016-08-14
I'm leaning toward the article is accurate.
-18 4thdimensionalshift 2016-08-14
Have you extensively researched all of the evidence on http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org ? There is a ridiculous amount of evidence not to mention I've personally seen chemtrails turn into a hazy mist later in the day, I've watched them form, turn into clouds, then fill the rest of the day with mist, and I live way out in the woods, there are no other sources of this mist.
23 thrownuptown 2016-08-14
lol, the same geoengineeringwatch that has been busted photoshopping images, lying about what certain things are (ballast barrels) while simultaneously displaying a complete lack of knowledge regarding atmospheric sciences? This is your source? Seriously?
15 King-Hell 2016-08-14
There is a simple scientific reason why contrails sometimes turn into a haze of cirrus cloud. You should find out what Deposition is and how it turns contrails into clouds. Jet fuel is a hydrocarbon which breaks down into carbon dioxide and water when it burns. Lots of water. Which freezes into ice crystals. Which then grow into snowflakes. Which then cover the sky in a sheet of haze.
-16 DrLucindaX 2016-08-14
Thanks for Correcting the Record!
12 Fractal_Soul 2016-08-14
Hydro-carbon. It's right there in the name...
-8 Starlifter2 2016-08-14
I see. Well then. It's settled science then.
6 LurkPro3000 2016-08-14
If observation isn't the first part of science- then what the fuck is?
3 AndThenThereWasBro 2016-08-14
Anecdotes sure as shit isn't.
Observation can be used to come up with a theory which you then test, with data and experiments, not with anecdotes.
-17 frogmelliot 2016-08-14
I'm fairly sure the government admitted to it a while back, definitely to cloud seeding which equates to chemtrails.
19 King-Hell 2016-08-14
Cloud seeding is real. Chemtrails are a conspiracy theory with no evidence to support them. Big difference.
-8 frogmelliot 2016-08-14
Isn't cloud seeding a plane leaving a TRAIL of CHEMICALS in the air?
20 DovahzulsABadConlang 2016-08-14
I guess if you count water as a chemical, then yeah.
-6 frogmelliot 2016-08-14
Cloud seeding is not done by spraying water, they use silver nitrate and other chemicals, do some research.
4 DovahzulsABadConlang 2016-08-14
You do some research. It's literally just the water vapour the jet releases. Before you start believing evidence contrary to science, you should first find evidence against the norm.
-1 frogmelliot 2016-08-14
Ok, you don't know what cloud seeding is, thats fine.
-3 4thdimensionalshift 2016-08-14
Go look at that users profile who you responded to and what they comment on, they seem like such a shill, like it's their job to debunk "conspiracies" lol
4 DovahzulsABadConlang 2016-08-14
This is my alt account, since I don't want /r/conspiracy to be on my main account. Just because I disagree with your nonsensical ramblings doesn't make me a shill.
11 King-Hell 2016-08-14
Cloud seeding is done at 5 - 10,000 feet using aircraft to dive in and out of existing clouds, spraying chemicals like silver iodide, dry ice, and common builder's cement, into the slipstream of the aircraft. So-called 'chemtrails' are coming off airliners flying at 30 - 40,000 feet.
-3 frogmelliot 2016-08-14
lol
-8 LurkPro3000 2016-08-14
Glad you got it all figured out there, buddy
-18 buttsloan 2016-08-14
So you admit that chemtrails are real, right on.
21 King-Hell 2016-08-14
No I do not admit that chemtrails are real. They are a paranoid conspiracy theory with no science to support them.
1 Sir_Mitchell15 2016-08-14
Note the usage of "so-called".
1 buttsloan 2016-08-14
"spraying chemicals like silver iodide, dry ice, and common builder's cement, into the slipstream of the aircraft"
Chemtrails.
19 King-Hell 2016-08-14
Cloud seeding is real. Chemtrails are a conspiracy theory with no evidence to support them. Big difference.