It's not just that. I've made 8 successful FOIA requests and one failing request. The failing request was the request for info on myself from the CIA. They did respond, they said, we cannot confirm nor deny that we do or do not have or that the material you request does or does not exist. The other agencies responded immediately with good answers.

So the FDA is being very officious here. It's clear what I'm asking for. Documentation related to the decision that 'cannabis has no medical value', at every point in history that was made. Since they are acting like "officious meat robots" --- "I'm sorry I do not understand your command, Hal" then I just asked them to send me ALL DOCUMENTS at the FDA containing the words 'cannabis', 'marijuana' or 'marihuana'

:) Yvw. I'll keep trying. But never underestimate their ability to not give us information we paid for. #rememberAaronSwartz

I just said all documents with the word cannabis / marijuana / marihuana within it. Keep in mind, they did not use the botanical name in the 70s, they used the latinized spelling 'marihuana', then 'marijuana' then cannabis so I want to see it all. It could potentially be thousands of pages, but that's ok. I've got a big budget for this and I'm planning on scanning and making the PDF available worldwide. I'm going to send copies directly to abby martin first of all, and also the same attorney group I used to initiate a class action against apple computer in the mid 2000s for some 32M dollars over their overheating 12" aluminum powerbook that resulted in my getting something like $4.56 compensation. Lol. But it was gratifying that I did that. It's funny if they had respected me more and replaced my powerbook per their agreement with me, instead of holding it for 3 weeks, returning it with greasy hairspray on it and a note saying it didn't have a problem (it did, it was overheating and shuttingoff), then a $2500 mistake wouldn't have cost them 32M

Thank you.

Thanks. I need all the luck I can get with these guys.

I don't know about all this. I'm in NC where its' illegal. I just know when I was colorado, chiba chews were boss and blueberry was the best--absolute--best strain imo with no exception. Some debated with me saying sour diesel kush was better but they were much more advanced users who didn't get paranoia

Not yet--I didn't think to do that. And I'm flattered that you would ask. I'll tell you what, if you would like to donate to me, please donate on my behalf to the following alt media peoples, as they are my influencers that I personally support. In other words, it's just going to go back out to them evenually:

• Guns and Butter -- soundcloud archive
• Zap Oracle
• Michael Parenti
• Corbettreport
• Gnostic Media
• Freeman Fly -- website
• Thomas Sheridan
• Ryan Dawson
• Media Monarchy
• Lionel Nation
• Psycho Sorceror
• Rob Bob's Backyard Farming
• AE911Truth.org
• Romero Institute
• Abby Martin -- The Empire Files -- Telesur -- no way to donate yet
• ConspiracyScope -- Mae Brussell Archive (not monetized but maybe you can send a msg)
• Wearechange

Also, although I don't agree with a very small 5% of what this filmmaker says, a lot of her research is good. She made the 911 documentary tour-de-force 'ring of power' and I saw it for free on youtube so I fee she needs some compensation.

http://www.helpfreetheearth.com/donate-contact.html

No one needs to die. Jail for the rest of their lives is good enough. Maybe we can make them spend at least as long as Chelsea Manning standing in solitary during their stay. Actually, no. Triple it.

You have to go through this to raise awareness of the corruption. That's what this is about. It's not about having stuff to present in court, it's about having stuff to present in court for civil cases AND to show everyone what the FDA is. It's basically a means to show the world with physical evidence that they are corrupt and cannot be trusted. If you can't trust the FDA to protect you from harm going into your bodies, then this undermines a huge trust in the government. That's the aim, btw. Because they fucking started it and declared war against humanity. Now it's time to fight back. They can consider this sedition but keep in mind, this woudl be fighting them with their own weapons--their own documentation and their inability to be honest.

So if they want to lock me up for being honest and show how they aren't, they can go rigtht the fuck ahead. If they want to lock me up for pointing out their hypocrisies, ok they can do that too. I'm immune to their bullshit now and I claim the right under natural law and the absence of actual constittutional law under cog governance to do as I wilt and that includes trash talking people who are being fundamentally immoral with your tax money and with your mind and mental heatlth. (you still don't believe me about cog governance making constitutional law (and thereby all laws) irrelevant, don't you?)

I think everyone here would do well to understand that there are no laws that are legal now and thats why hillary isn't in jail and neither is obama and the cia hasn't been dissolved. This is the most corrupt, asinine, draconian, terrible, illegitimate government in the history of known civilization. And most importantly: it's illegal by it's own contrivances and mathematical proofs of language. You can't have a public institution that is of the people, for the people and by the people that has speciial privilege that is not similarly granted to the public. Public is public. Therefore we have constitutional avoidance of the cia, which means theres no constitution. This means theres no law. So if you're obeying a law, thats because youv'e been entrained into legal adherence as a pavlovian social response to a past situation in which laws were relevant. Either that, or there is 'secret' law that only pertains to cia. However, since cia is public, the argument stands that that implies they aren't public and therefore they can be declared an enemy of the state, since they've taken actions against US citizens in contravention of US const. law. Or it's the case that the 'secret law' is illegitimate because it violates 'public sovereignty' which is the fundamental basis of the legitimacy of the US constitution.

That's a really legal contortion of a simple concept: you can't have your cake and eat it to. Unless you're a freemason. Then you can have that cake delivered by a naked and bloodied 8 yr old and when you're done eating him there's leftover cake for the boys in blue.