WTC7 Evaluation Conclusions: Memo sent to a liberty mutual to reinvestigate Silverstein insurance fraud

27  2016-09-12 by 911bodysnatchers322

MEMO


ATTN:

* Travelers Companies
* Zurich American Insurance Company
* Swiss Reinsurance Company
* Employers Insurance Company of Wausau
* Allianz Global Risks U.S. Insurance Company
* Industrial Risk Insurers
* Royal Indemnity Company

To Whom it May Concern:

The results of an expensive and complex engineering reevaluation of NISTs findings have formulated a valid and irrefutable scientific dissent to NIST's conclusions that would be useful to your insurance companies, should your companies decide to pursue an insurance-fraud investigation. This project was called WTC7 Evaluation. And you may see the study, the work, and their conclusions for yourself:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7IVCSpalbA

This physics-accurate simulation has now proven that it was impossible for WTC building 7 to have collapsed due to fire.

In other words, your insurance company now has very good evidence to demonstrate controlled demolition of building 7, or at the least that the insurance claim made on building 7 was invalid (ie: not a terror attack but a self-inflicted injury).

You owe it to your insurees to recuperate the astronomical claim payment on building 7 (at the least) because of fraud by taking them to court. And getting it back. It's a business decision. You get to be the first mover on this, and receive the acclaim. I'm giving you an easy win. Please take it.

Best Regards,

5 comments

I messaged them all in 2002. No response. They didn't give a shit. The rate payers took the hit.

its all about the $$$ and every player knew their angle to cover

You should post this over in a lawyer sub and have them fancy it up with legalese.

The fraud was transferred over to the consumers: all of us.

They definitely are more aware than we are that it was fraud.

They have nothing to gain as a company to do anything in regards to 9/11.

Exactly, fuck this is rage inducing