Sometimes I think that Anonymous is the government , putting on a show for the people ... Sometimes I think it's real, sometimes I think Elon Musk is a paid actor or military man paid to keep us thinking about the future that's never gonna happen, sometimes I think he's genius and maybe really onto something.... Sometimes I think Wikileaks is government, sometimes I don't..... I have no idea what to believe anymore, and that's just how they like.
After 2 years of wondering what's true or false, and what's real or not, I've come to the conclusion that there's absolutely no way to tell. The Internet is an insanely useful research tool, but it's also the best disinformation tool. There's just no longer an sources or anybody that I really trust. I just don't know what to believe anymore.
It's not that bad, the disinformation is actually pretty easy to spot, look at snopes debunking of 911 discrepancies, it's so blatantly dishonest, just need to learn to filter the disinfo, the Internet is a fabulous tool, we now know for instance that 2 of the last 2 top political sex scandals involved people who happened to be of jewish descent, we also know that a congress woman jane Harmon was an israeli spy, and we are starting to uncover the Hollywood pedophile blackmail circuit that stretches to ny and Washington
the best way to defeat darkness is to shine light onto it, this is why the corrupt eu is clamoring for the right to be forgotten and the un is trying to censor free speech.
For WikiLeaks to release Rothschild, Rockefeller documents, someone would first need to hack into the Rothschild/Rockefeller networks then steal the data and finally send it to Wikileaks.
Wikileaks doesn't just have access to everyones data.
What sort of dip$#!t is OP?
Hey Wikileaks! When are you going to see a Taylor Swift and Miranda Kerr sex tape?! Hurr durr!!!
Very true - Wikileaks only release information that whistleblowers have leaked to them. Suggesting that they are in cahoots because they haven't released information they don't have access to is exactly the type of thing that sews the seeds of suspicion and division that those in power want.
We are discussing a vast web of deceit and manipulation across centuries covering multiple lines of inquiry and exposing just one aspect of it involves years of dedicated work. It's disingenuous to accuse Assange of duplicity because of the limitations of the means at his disposal. I have no doubt that should reliable information regarding the criminal multi-national machinations of the likes of the Rothschilds pass throughout the hands of Wikileaks that it would be released by them. The implication here is that they have this information and are deliberately suppressing its release and I see no proof of that.
Rule 10, he isn't trolling. Please try to make an actual point or argument rather than just insulting users, you've already been warned about this once before.
Keep pretending like you are above presidential politics, when all assange has done is try and hurt the democratic party and suggest that trump not use email.
If you can't convert your own simple misguided thoughts into text form you don't belong on the internet, let alone this subreddit.
.
You don't even know what you were trying to say, so it's ridiculous you'd expect others to decipher your nonsense. Judging by all the downvotes and people calling you out, no one could understand what you were trying to explain, not even yourself, bub.
.
If you want to have a real conversation with adults and actually be taken seriously, you're going to want to learn how to properly convey your opinions next time.
The why is because you're anti community. You basically act like one of the assholes from r/conspiritard.
Maybe your heart was in the job once but it feels like you're just sick of the whole scene at this point. Maybe you've got a new girlfriend and your priorities have shifted.
Maybe ops around here should do moderation work with their mod account and comment with the community on another account. I think you use shill speak on purpose to bait users to call you a shill so you can ban them for kicks.
Thanks for the suggestion but I find deception and dishonesty abhorrent.
How is under a new handle dishonest? No one knows who you are behind a user name. Wouldn't you rather have conversations with people in other threads without them citing the fact that you're a mod of this sub? I'm only subscribed to this sub and I take flak all the time because of this sub.
How many accounts do you use in this sub?
One but I switch accounts due to shadowbans. This is my 8th main "form".
Probably just someone shitting on Wikileaks to discredit them in the public eye when they're due to release big information pertaining to Hillary Clinton soon. There's been plenty of this going on for weeks, I'm not surprised to see even more of it around here right before Wikileaks is expected to drop a bomb.
Gets called a terrorist, people on MSM demand he be tried for high treason, is confined to the Ecuadorian embassy in London, alleged rape cases that don't hold water outside Sweden with contradictory testimonies, people demanding death penalty should he be tried in the US.
Your definition of a pedestal is very different from mine.
It's also worth noticing that Anonymous and the government are both ostensibly the People. The government is a centralized hierarchy of the state who is supposed to represent the People, while Anonymous is a de-centralized organization to represent the people against the tyranny of corporations and the state.
Agreed. However, we can't exactly hold Assange responsible for the leaks he gets -- or doesn't. It's not like he controls all the hacking that ever hacked.
Why would the editor-in-chief of Wikileaks talk about a subject that Wikileaks has no documents to release on? Do you not realize that Wikileaks is a journalistic organization whose sole purpose is to release and publicize leaked documents which expose corruption/crime? What do you expect Assange to do, go on a media circuit talking about how Assange doesn't like problem X or problem Y even though Wikileaks has absolutely nothing to release on that subject? Why would he do this? Would that be good journalism? Would this help Wikileaks' goal of releasing leaked documents for their editor-in-chief to get CNN to let him have airtime to talk about a problem for which he and his organization have no proof? How fucking stupid are you?
He would do it if he was part of a movement to discover who the puppet masters are. As of now 284 people have upvoted this post so I guess people agree with me more than with you. Bummer :(
One thing's for sure. Trump isn't just an actor that randomly decided to get into politics one day. He clearly knows how the game works. Apparently he has little real dirt they can use other than probably unpaid taxes.
Of course you will never see it from wikileaks or anyone else. Those emails would be like plutonium, holding it in your hands would wind up killing you (if your lucky).
Assuming people who have enough money to own private military grade communcation satellites with encrypted channels, would use simple email. You could probably get emails from one of their companies. But I would guess, personal emails either don't exist or getting them would be like hacking the ISS.
I can see this for the Panama papers, with it being funded by soros, kellog, Ford foundation etc...
wikileaks on the other hand is funded by small donors. If wikileaks is a pysop than what Government or intelligence agency do you suppose they are working for? Wikileaks has released damping evidence on the US/russia/Israel. ..perhaps china? they seem to not post much of anything negative on China.
I always thought that initially when it was released. The big names left off but a bunch of mid/high ranking crooks exposed to keep the target off of the super elite's back.
Exactly. It's purpose was Iceland. Immediately following the leaks the PM of Iceland was over thrown, 16 F-16's flew into Iceland that day. 3 days later; the only bankers to be jailed during the whole 2008 financial crisis walked right out of jail. The US conducted a coup without firing a single bullet.
Hey R/conspiracy why do we pretend that the world is run by some bond movie Villain rather than the incredibly complex and varied fight for power many stake holders take part in.
this topic was just created for shills to bash wikileaks since they're expected to drop something big soon
I think most of the people who actually frequent this sub understand exactly the problem you're getting at. The "complex and varied fight for power many stake holders take part in" thing.
you are asking the wrong question. You should be asking yourself why millions of years of evolution has led to people being drawn to bond movies? The answer is because they replicate reality. The illusion played out for you by politicians and ceo's is the false reality.
You should be asking yourself why millions of years of evolution has led to people being drawn to bond movies?
I would say because it offers a very simple idea of good against evil, rather than the chaos and cacophony of our current age. As well it shows us that on some level if we could uncover the conspiracy and unmask it that it would bring about a better age.
The illusion played out for you by politicians and ceo's is the false reality.
To an extent but, believing that they are all part of some spectre conspiracy being orchestrated like ballet by highers ups is naive, and well hollywood esqe.
Its almost comforting to believe that the chaos is controlled rather than just survival of the fittest, but again i;m not discounting the collusion of people in positions of power, groups like Bilderburg serve to consolidate power.
I'd imagine those emails would be insanely boring...
'Mr. Rockefeller,
It was nice seeing you in Austin (regarding our plan to secede Texas, of course). It's nice to hear your niece is doing well (don't forget I pulled the strings to get her in that highly influential position). Perhaps we can get together over the holiday and do another round of golf (because we both know golf is code for war games in Latin America). I think my new putter needs to see some action (Trump, against Brazil.)
Your Friend,
Baron Rothsy'
Omit the stuff in parentheses... have you people never bought weed before? Gawd.
We havent even seen the leaks from assange that were promised to take down Hillary before the debate so what makes you think we are going to see leaks of this level?
Wikileaks doesn't do hacking, they only publicize and release leaked documents. If certain organizations aren't having their internal documents leaked, that's not Wikileaks fault. Wikileaks does not choose targets to attack, they simply release documents as they become available.
If you think other criminal organizations deserve to be exposed, you should encourage the people who would do the infiltration/exfiltration. Encourage the hackers who would do it, don't chide Wikileaks for failing at something that they've never done.
woah shills coming out of the woodwork to slam wikileaks in this thread
This is truly a good sign, my compatriots. I can't wait to find out what their next batch brings if the shills are this desperate to undermine them now. Reminds me of how I saw articles a few weeks back suggesting that Wikileaks would release falsified documents for the first time ever... the DNC knows their fraud is going to be exposed further so before they're even exposed they got shills out playing defense. Should be good, I can't wait, although it does unfortunately look like they're not going to make it out before the first debate.
Exactly, if Wikileaks was legit we would have meaningful information that actually impacted our nation and produced results. ....Not Hollywood produced misdirection films on Snowden.
We are discussing a vast web of deceit and manipulation across centuries covering multiple lines of inquiry and exposing just one aspect of it involves years of dedicated work. It's disingenuous to accuse Assange of duplicity because of the limitations of the means at his disposal. I have no doubt that should reliable information regarding the criminal multi-national machinations of the likes of the Rothschilds pass throughout the hands of Wikileaks that it would be released by them. The implication here is that they have this information and are deliberately suppressing its release and I see no proof of that.
122 comments
131 OffOfCommission182 2016-09-25
Sometimes I think that Anonymous is the government , putting on a show for the people ... Sometimes I think it's real, sometimes I think Elon Musk is a paid actor or military man paid to keep us thinking about the future that's never gonna happen, sometimes I think he's genius and maybe really onto something.... Sometimes I think Wikileaks is government, sometimes I don't..... I have no idea what to believe anymore, and that's just how they like.
48 PlasmaHorse 2016-09-25
After 2 years of wondering what's true or false, and what's real or not, I've come to the conclusion that there's absolutely no way to tell. The Internet is an insanely useful research tool, but it's also the best disinformation tool. There's just no longer an sources or anybody that I really trust. I just don't know what to believe anymore.
12 saitosoul 2016-09-25
It's not that bad, the disinformation is actually pretty easy to spot, look at snopes debunking of 911 discrepancies, it's so blatantly dishonest, just need to learn to filter the disinfo, the Internet is a fabulous tool, we now know for instance that 2 of the last 2 top political sex scandals involved people who happened to be of jewish descent, we also know that a congress woman jane Harmon was an israeli spy, and we are starting to uncover the Hollywood pedophile blackmail circuit that stretches to ny and Washington
the best way to defeat darkness is to shine light onto it, this is why the corrupt eu is clamoring for the right to be forgotten and the un is trying to censor free speech.
Also, israel did 911
-15 SooperModelsDotCom 2016-09-25
Lulz.
No thanks.
Snopes has their own far left agenda they like to support.
Snopes = Joke
20 saitosoul 2016-09-25
I was using snopes as an example of disinfo
8 OffOfCommission182 2016-09-25
Agreed
32 ShellOilNigeria 2016-09-25
For WikiLeaks to release Rothschild, Rockefeller documents, someone would first need to hack into the Rothschild/Rockefeller networks then steal the data and finally send it to Wikileaks.
Wikileaks doesn't just have access to everyones data.
What sort of dip$#!t is OP?
Hey Wikileaks! When are you going to see a Taylor Swift and Miranda Kerr sex tape?! Hurr durr!!!
13 Lo-Tsen7 2016-09-25
Very true - Wikileaks only release information that whistleblowers have leaked to them. Suggesting that they are in cahoots because they haven't released information they don't have access to is exactly the type of thing that sews the seeds of suspicion and division that those in power want.
-1 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
assange gets lots of attention from the MSM, I have never heard him once mention the Rothschilds or Rockefellers.
8 Lo-Tsen7 2016-09-25
We are discussing a vast web of deceit and manipulation across centuries covering multiple lines of inquiry and exposing just one aspect of it involves years of dedicated work. It's disingenuous to accuse Assange of duplicity because of the limitations of the means at his disposal. I have no doubt that should reliable information regarding the criminal multi-national machinations of the likes of the Rothschilds pass throughout the hands of Wikileaks that it would be released by them. The implication here is that they have this information and are deliberately suppressing its release and I see no proof of that.
-2 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
The implication here is that if they were legit you would have never heard of them.
6 TheGhostOfDusty 2016-09-25
That is fuzzy logic and does not support the implication that you made in the title.
-3 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
is that like fuzzy math? If you can't see my point then I definitely know why people think you aint with it around here.
4 [deleted] 2016-09-25
[removed]
0 Ambiguously_Ironic 2016-09-25
Rule 10, he isn't trolling. Please try to make an actual point or argument rather than just insulting users, you've already been warned about this once before.
2 TheGhostOfDusty 2016-09-25
Keep huntin' that witch!
1 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
Keep pretending like you are above presidential politics, when all assange has done is try and hurt the democratic party and suggest that trump not use email.
2 FerretHydrocodone 2016-09-25
That makes 0 sense, and contradicts half the things you've said in this thread.
1 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
I'm sorry you don't get it.
1 FerretHydrocodone 2016-09-25
I'm sorry you can't convey your own thoughts in text form.
1 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
if you don't understand what is being implied you don't belong in this sub
1 FerretHydrocodone 2016-09-25
If you can't convert your own simple misguided thoughts into text form you don't belong on the internet, let alone this subreddit.
.
You don't even know what you were trying to say, so it's ridiculous you'd expect others to decipher your nonsense. Judging by all the downvotes and people calling you out, no one could understand what you were trying to explain, not even yourself, bub.
.
If you want to have a real conversation with adults and actually be taken seriously, you're going to want to learn how to properly convey your opinions next time.
1 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
People get downvoted for telling the truth around here. I've made my point and the post itself has done great. Sorry that hurts your ego. :(
2 sidebycide 2016-09-25
in due time
5 TheGhostOfDusty 2016-09-25
Hear hear.
People will upvote anything if it's snarky in the right way. :/
2 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
Now I see why they want you gone as a mod
9 TheGhostOfDusty 2016-09-25
Who is "they"?
And why? Spell it out for me.
4 caucazoid 2016-09-25
14 Plus people can't be wrong until the thread was deleted.
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/54a21n/calling_for_the_immediate_removal_of/
The why is because you're anti community. You basically act like one of the assholes from r/conspiritard.
Maybe your heart was in the job once but it feels like you're just sick of the whole scene at this point. Maybe you've got a new girlfriend and your priorities have shifted.
1 TheGhostOfDusty 2016-09-25
OP deleted that witch hunt post before I saw it. Read the comments and you can figure out why.
1 caucazoid 2016-09-25
Maybe ops around here should do moderation work with their mod account and comment with the community on another account. I think you use shill speak on purpose to bait users to call you a shill so you can ban them for kicks.
1 TheGhostOfDusty 2016-09-25
Thanks for the suggestion but I find deception and dishonesty abhorrent.
How many accounts do you use in this sub?
1 caucazoid 2016-09-25
How is under a new handle dishonest? No one knows who you are behind a user name. Wouldn't you rather have conversations with people in other threads without them citing the fact that you're a mod of this sub? I'm only subscribed to this sub and I take flak all the time because of this sub.
One but I switch accounts due to shadowbans. This is my 8th main "form".
1 TheGhostOfDusty 2016-09-25
Would you not feel a bit dishonest if you, say, came to your workplace one day wearing an anonymous disguise and interacted with people?
2 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
Don't pretend like you don't remember the post calling for you to be removed.
-1 [deleted] 2016-09-25
[deleted]
1 hillarykillary 2016-09-25
Should the mods be able to post their opinion? IF so I would say it needs to be done with another user name...you make the mods look bad.
4 Afrobean 2016-09-25
Probably just someone shitting on Wikileaks to discredit them in the public eye when they're due to release big information pertaining to Hillary Clinton soon. There's been plenty of this going on for weeks, I'm not surprised to see even more of it around here right before Wikileaks is expected to drop a bomb.
1 sickofallofyou 2016-09-25
Russians have that data.
-7 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
Assange doesn't want the information dip$#!t
9 ShellOilNigeria 2016-09-25
Did you speak with him on the subject?
0 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
Never seems to be one of his talking points
5 TheGhostOfDusty 2016-09-25
start a secure global leak database to promote and facilitate the exposure of wrongdoingget defamed by "conspiracy theorists" for not leaking things that they do not possess1 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
When you are legit the msm ignores your ass. They don't give you a pedestal.
2 ishkariot 2016-09-25
Gets called a terrorist, people on MSM demand he be tried for high treason, is confined to the Ecuadorian embassy in London, alleged rape cases that don't hold water outside Sweden with contradictory testimonies, people demanding death penalty should he be tried in the US.
Your definition of a pedestal is very different from mine.
1 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
Msm talks about him constantly. With everything going on in his life he seems just like a god damned jesus christ figure for pawns to rally behind.
3 drewshaver 2016-09-25
Sometimes anonymous is a government. Other times it's not. Anyone can put on the mask.
1 Afrobean 2016-09-25
It's also worth noticing that Anonymous and the government are both ostensibly the People. The government is a centralized hierarchy of the state who is supposed to represent the People, while Anonymous is a de-centralized organization to represent the people against the tyranny of corporations and the state.
2 lily_levasseur 2016-09-25
Agreed. However, we can't exactly hold Assange responsible for the leaks he gets -- or doesn't. It's not like he controls all the hacking that ever hacked.
2 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
He doesn't talk about it.
1 Afrobean 2016-09-25
Why would the editor-in-chief of Wikileaks talk about a subject that Wikileaks has no documents to release on? Do you not realize that Wikileaks is a journalistic organization whose sole purpose is to release and publicize leaked documents which expose corruption/crime? What do you expect Assange to do, go on a media circuit talking about how Assange doesn't like problem X or problem Y even though Wikileaks has absolutely nothing to release on that subject? Why would he do this? Would that be good journalism? Would this help Wikileaks' goal of releasing leaked documents for their editor-in-chief to get CNN to let him have airtime to talk about a problem for which he and his organization have no proof? How fucking stupid are you?
1 lily_levasseur 2016-09-25
Harsh words man, but so true.
0 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
He would do it if he was part of a movement to discover who the puppet masters are. As of now 284 people have upvoted this post so I guess people agree with me more than with you. Bummer :(
1 HangoutUnlimited 2016-09-25
Yep. Same feels. I don't know what's up or down anymore.. they are good at what they do.
I'm just about ready to say welcome to the new world order and ask if there are any benefits and the salary.
1 HitlaryforPrison 2016-09-25
controlled opposition-- aka pacification
0 [deleted] 2016-09-25
[removed]
1 Ambiguously_Ironic 2016-09-25
If this is all you have to offer, say nothing. Consider this your warning.
0 GoochMon 2016-09-25
It's all about probability man, no one has ever "proved" gravity, or other scientific things you can't observe.
-1 [deleted] 2016-09-25
[deleted]
4 pvtbobble 2016-09-25
Anonymously
2 PotatoAvenger 2016-09-25
Mind. Blown.
26 meta4one 2016-09-25
those old fucks probably still send letters..
14 captaincarb 2016-09-25
... in languages we don't understand most likely.
3 Telenerd 2016-09-25
BREAKING NEWS: Rothschild Horse and Carriage Hacked!
22 anarchopotato 2016-09-25
the real elites dont use comprimised systems
4 Telenerd 2016-09-25
All systems are exploitable. The real secrets are traded in person.
2 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-08/julian-assange-says-donald-trump-should-stay-away-from-email
2 jav253 2016-09-25
One thing's for sure. Trump isn't just an actor that randomly decided to get into politics one day. He clearly knows how the game works. Apparently he has little real dirt they can use other than probably unpaid taxes.
14 HangoutUnlimited 2016-09-25
He is part of the team ;)
They are all on the same team. They keep up this illusion for pleb TV watchers.
12 m3mb3r5h1p_r3v0k3d 2016-09-25
Of course you will never see it from wikileaks or anyone else. Those emails would be like plutonium, holding it in your hands would wind up killing you (if your lucky).
Assuming people who have enough money to own private military grade communcation satellites with encrypted channels, would use simple email. You could probably get emails from one of their companies. But I would guess, personal emails either don't exist or getting them would be like hacking the ISS.
11 [deleted] 2016-09-25
"BREAKING NEWS: Ecuadorian Embassy hit by "rod from god" today. Russia to blame. More at 11."
9 gnrl2 2016-09-25
Many have tried. Many have died.
7 johnnygeeksheek 2016-09-25
Plot twist: Rothschilds run wiki leaks.
5 Orangutan 2016-09-25
yep. Wikileaks and The Panama Papers are psy ops. Never anything prosecutable. Just fear mongering.
6 captaincarb 2016-09-25
I can see this for the Panama papers, with it being funded by soros, kellog, Ford foundation etc...
wikileaks on the other hand is funded by small donors. If wikileaks is a pysop than what Government or intelligence agency do you suppose they are working for? Wikileaks has released damping evidence on the US/russia/Israel. ..perhaps china? they seem to not post much of anything negative on China.
4 RooLoL 2016-09-25
I always thought that initially when it was released. The big names left off but a bunch of mid/high ranking crooks exposed to keep the target off of the super elite's back.
4 captaincarb 2016-09-25
Exactly. It's purpose was Iceland. Immediately following the leaks the PM of Iceland was over thrown, 16 F-16's flew into Iceland that day. 3 days later; the only bankers to be jailed during the whole 2008 financial crisis walked right out of jail. The US conducted a coup without firing a single bullet.
1 outbackdude 2016-09-25
Wiki leaks was great when it was a real wiki. Someone should make realwikileaks.org
5 chasmoffaith 2016-09-25
Hey R/conspiracy why do we pretend that the world is run by some bond movie Villain rather than the incredibly complex and varied fight for power many stake holders take part in.
7 Afrobean 2016-09-25
this topic was just created for shills to bash wikileaks since they're expected to drop something big soon
I think most of the people who actually frequent this sub understand exactly the problem you're getting at. The "complex and varied fight for power many stake holders take part in" thing.
3 [deleted] 2016-09-25
[deleted]
0 chasmoffaith 2016-09-25
I'm going to assume your making a comical leap to be edgy.
0 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
you are asking the wrong question. You should be asking yourself why millions of years of evolution has led to people being drawn to bond movies? The answer is because they replicate reality. The illusion played out for you by politicians and ceo's is the false reality.
4 chasmoffaith 2016-09-25
I would say because it offers a very simple idea of good against evil, rather than the chaos and cacophony of our current age. As well it shows us that on some level if we could uncover the conspiracy and unmask it that it would bring about a better age.
To an extent but, believing that they are all part of some spectre conspiracy being orchestrated like ballet by highers ups is naive, and well hollywood esqe.
Its almost comforting to believe that the chaos is controlled rather than just survival of the fittest, but again i;m not discounting the collusion of people in positions of power, groups like Bilderburg serve to consolidate power.
1 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
Are you familiar with world trade center 7?
0 [deleted] 2016-09-25
[deleted]
2 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
What happened on that day would be unbelievable even for a bond movie.
1 chasmoffaith 2016-09-25
?
2 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
Why did you delete your comment?
5 Incognitroll 2016-09-25
Since they control the world, presumably they control the Internet. Can't see this happening
5 TheGhostOfDusty 2016-09-25
Uhh, Wikileaks does not conduct hacking operations. You're asking the wrong people. Pay closer attention to the show. ;)
-3 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
I'm fine thanks. I suggest you heed your own advice.
http://www.henrymakow.com/stranger_than_fiction_life_of.html
8 TheGhostOfDusty 2016-09-25
Cool story bro.
Kindly refrain from posting titles here that cause people to have gross misconceptions. Thanks!
-2 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
There you go. You do remember. I think people can think fine for themselves. ;)
4 tbaybu 2016-09-25
Good question
4 shitbric 2016-09-25
No email needed when dealing with the devil friend.
4 GenieManManMan 2016-09-25
Doesnt Julian have a rothschild lawyer?
4 cucklordsupreme 2016-09-25
I'd imagine those emails would be insanely boring...
'Mr. Rockefeller,
It was nice seeing you in Austin (regarding our plan to secede Texas, of course). It's nice to hear your niece is doing well (don't forget I pulled the strings to get her in that highly influential position). Perhaps we can get together over the holiday and do another round of golf (because we both know golf is code for war games in Latin America). I think my new putter needs to see some action (Trump, against Brazil.)
Your Friend, Baron Rothsy'
Omit the stuff in parentheses... have you people never bought weed before? Gawd.
3 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
we'll break the code.
3 supergameman 2016-09-25
Hm...you do make a good point. Has Assange ever talked about this?
2 MidwestArk 2016-09-25
No, nor has he talked about his cult upbringing
5 johnnnbockkk 2016-09-25
please elaborate
2 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
http://www.theglobalreality.com/documentaries/reality-of-illusion-part-4-julian-assange-the-white-brotherhood-and-the-nazis
3 ScullyWontBelieb 2016-09-25
I would love some Rothschild email action
2 colordrops 2016-09-25
We havent even seen the leaks from assange that were promised to take down Hillary before the debate so what makes you think we are going to see leaks of this level?
0 Slomogotoslo 2016-09-25
Wow Arrange is all talk. Deadlines up. Either there never was information, or he demanded a fat sum from Hillary.
2 RooLoL 2016-09-25
For all we know he already got that fat sum.
2 Afrobean 2016-09-25
Wikileaks doesn't do hacking, they only publicize and release leaked documents. If certain organizations aren't having their internal documents leaked, that's not Wikileaks fault. Wikileaks does not choose targets to attack, they simply release documents as they become available.
If you think other criminal organizations deserve to be exposed, you should encourage the people who would do the infiltration/exfiltration. Encourage the hackers who would do it, don't chide Wikileaks for failing at something that they've never done.
-3 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
Assange should be encouraging them
2 Afrobean 2016-09-25
woah shills coming out of the woodwork to slam wikileaks in this thread
This is truly a good sign, my compatriots. I can't wait to find out what their next batch brings if the shills are this desperate to undermine them now. Reminds me of how I saw articles a few weeks back suggesting that Wikileaks would release falsified documents for the first time ever... the DNC knows their fraud is going to be exposed further so before they're even exposed they got shills out playing defense. Should be good, I can't wait, although it does unfortunately look like they're not going to make it out before the first debate.
2 Juan__Lennon 2016-09-25
LOL. Glad you're finally picking up on the one group of people who NEVER see any damage fromWikiLeaks.
2 mennitti 2016-09-25
Exactly, if Wikileaks was legit we would have meaningful information that actually impacted our nation and produced results. ....Not Hollywood produced misdirection films on Snowden.
1 no1113 2016-09-25
Wikileaks will deliver...let's just wait...
1 sickofallofyou 2016-09-25
When the cheques stop.
1 TexasTacos 2016-09-25
Look within the email leaks you already have access to.
1 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
I have. There are a few crumbs and thats about it.
1 Romek_himself 2016-09-25
wikileaks dont hack anything ... they only release what other people leak to them
1 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
Assange was accused by the australian government of hacking them. For all you know he is fucking guccifer 2.0
1 Romek_himself 2016-09-25
and everyone know the australian government lie and say this just to have a reason ...
1 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
Like how he's straight out of a Nazi cult?
1 photonicphacet 2016-09-25
As soon as you hack their servers and post their info to Wikileaks.
1 CaucasianEagle 2016-09-25
I would like to see assange call for that
1 537311 2016-09-25
Im starting to think wiki leak is controlled opp
1 u238ed 2016-09-25
Just dropped.
https://twitter.com/AnonymousGlobo/status/793602434337767428
Holy shit.
0 fallingandflying 2016-09-25
When their mail is hacked?
8 Lo-Tsen7 2016-09-25
We are discussing a vast web of deceit and manipulation across centuries covering multiple lines of inquiry and exposing just one aspect of it involves years of dedicated work. It's disingenuous to accuse Assange of duplicity because of the limitations of the means at his disposal. I have no doubt that should reliable information regarding the criminal multi-national machinations of the likes of the Rothschilds pass throughout the hands of Wikileaks that it would be released by them. The implication here is that they have this information and are deliberately suppressing its release and I see no proof of that.
2 sidebycide 2016-09-25
in due time
1 FerretHydrocodone 2016-09-25
I'm sorry you can't convey your own thoughts in text form.