Alex Jones Shill to destory support for WikiLeaks
52 2016-10-05 by [deleted]
From yesterdays live cast on info wars Alex Jones and Info Wars have been slating WikiLeaks on not leaking more stuff that day to destory hillary. This came across to me as childish and very naieve. Alex Jones has never given 1 though about Julian's detainment or what WikiLeaks has been going through.
With InfoWars you can donate in dollars and buy items from the store. WikiLeaks had all banks embargo the organisation such that no donations in normal currency's can be made. Yes they have a store but its much smaller and yes they have donations now but in bitcoin and its still difficult for them.
Alex also believes they leak more in a year and leak more credible stuff. None of which are true when you truely think of the impact wikileaks has had on the world. Such as the Arab Spring. I believe Alex Jones has been bought off some time ago and has coincided by more heavy mentions of info wars and alex in main stream news.
32 comments
27 Ahem_Sure 2016-10-05
Yep. He has always existed for the sole purpose of creating an association between real conspiracies and real world incidents and his absurd conspiracy theories and his own brand of lunacy.
He made false claims about an october surprise when WikiLeaks were just having a conference for their ten year, then he acted like it was a personal attack on him when they didn't. If he would have shut his fat head for a few minutes he would have heard Assange say they were dropping the next leak soon and it was regarding the uS.
16 moparornocar 2016-10-05
dude makes his money on drama and ratings.
3 gatekeepr 2016-10-05
His show has the style of celebrity gossip shows. Also, I just saw this ad on 8chan's /pol/. Glad he's keeping that cosy little corner funded.
19 mjesmjes 2016-10-05
DIsInfoWars
11 Denmark1976 2016-10-05
Mr. Jones is a US intelligence plant, his job is to distract and misinform the gullible masses, a glorified but overpaid fat white lightning rod!
5 RightNowImReady 2016-10-05
Is there any proof that he is a plant?
5 Nexusmaxis 2016-10-05
Youre in /r/conspiracy and care about proof? Lel
Just look it up on youtube
1 Ne_Wa 2016-10-05
No conspiracy theorist would endorse a presidential candidate knowing they're all controlled and owned by a shadow government. He endorses and always talks about Donald Trump while constantly attacking Hillary and her supporters. He's more of a right wing republican "conspiracy" theorist.
0 slippinsideways 2016-10-05
Yes. First step is He openly admits how much of his family and friends are CIA and other govt. Entity's.
3 SageeDuzit 2016-10-05
Alex Jones = CIA COINTELPRO (most likely) William Cooper replacement put in place to further disenfranchise the people waken up right before and after 9/11 (diversion)..the shit he says and does and how he acts (all while receiving some kind of Main Stream presence) sends a lot of red flags.
Never got that same vibe from Bill Cooper on the other hand. From listening to him talk about JFK Jr (after his murder/death) and the shit he was saying in 2001 right before 9/11 is prophetic as fuck.
10 cashcow1 2016-10-05
I agree 100%, and this really made me lose a ton of respect for Alex Jones. I've always taken him with a grain of salt, because his focus is on entertainment and ratings, not good reporting.
But it makes no sense to turn on Assange when he's literally worried that a SWAT team is going to come up the fire escape and murder him.
8 JHVH_UNO 2016-10-05
Alex Jones is the corporate governments version of Bill Cooper.
2 Grego888 2016-10-05
They needed to replace bill Cooper with something they could change control / discredit. Alex Jones was that replacement when they kicked it into high gear after 9/11
7 Jeffersonien 2016-10-05
It used to be that half or more people here on Reddit would fight to defend jones but so many people have explained his fakery that he only has the cultish few and support from MSM.
The jig is up - so he may as well push his flock into the pen more forcefully before they too wake up.
6 edhredhr 2016-10-05
I guess things are desperate for the establishment when Alex Jones is trying to discredit a global organization like Wikileaks.
5 Bungmustard 2016-10-05
Dont forget Hillary brought him up personally and said he had a dark heart for questioning the Sandy Hook School shooting.
5 Disquestrian 2016-10-05
He was seriously butt hurt. Not his best hour.
4 toe689 2016-10-05
Didn't he think Assange and Wikileaks were government ran early on? I could be wrong... but I thought he called Wikileaks an inside job
9 Ahem_Sure 2016-10-05
Yeah of course. He only jumped on board when he thought he could attach himself and when the leaks hurt Hillary.
I have seen a lot of people, who were for Wikileaks when they leaked stuff the republicans and patriots didn't like, do a complete 180 now that stuff is coming out against Dems.
3 slippinsideways 2016-10-05
Fuck Alex Jones
2 leftistpatriot 2016-10-05
Alex Jones is Cointelpro.
Julian Assange is Cointelpro.
1 SoCo_cpp 2016-10-05
Standard co-opting.
0 inbetweentime 2016-10-05
I don't respect Alex Jones, but I'm starting to lose any respect for Assange too. Especially after watching the Oct. 4th webcast and seeing him mockingly avoid dropping valuable info. He was all like "There's a lot of expectations in the US tonight. You need to realize I wouldn't drop damaging info at 3 am, plebs." The man doesn't actually care about the truth, IMO.
3 Maldovin 2016-10-05
Because he knew it was bullshit misquotes that led to these expectations
1 inbetweentime 2016-10-05
Yeah but my simple point remains, if he's got the info but isn't releasing it, what are his actual motives? Cause they ain't truth fighting.
3 Maldovin 2016-10-05
So there were articles right before Tuesday implying Clinton once called to drone the guy, make from that what you like regarding his actions
I'm sure you're smart enough to connect the dots
2 inbetweentime 2016-10-05
Are you implying he is keeping tight-lipped for fear of being droned?
2 Maldovin 2016-10-05
For now, probably, they know a lot more than we do, I assume they figured out something was imminent and successfully put focus on the fact Clinton once brought up killing him as an insurance and they decided to stay hush hush on it for now
The timing of that release was a bit too coincidental, no? Also the fact it went from balcony to live stream
1 inbetweentime 2016-10-05
I get where you're coming from but
A) They don't care which tid-bits he releases when, they want to kill the guy anyway. It's not dependent on him leaking this email or that email at a certain time.
B) He switched it to a live stream, understandable. Then he didn't release anything. A sniper can't shoot him inside an embassy, and the US isn't going to drone an embassy. So why didn't he release anything?
C) If he fears for his life because of the Clintons, releasing info on them is one way of mitigating those dangers. Keeping it to himself is not... i.e. drawing attention to the fact they want to kill him does not make it any easier for them to kill him.
Just my thoughts. All seems like a charade.
3 [deleted] 2016-10-05
Julian is my hero to be honest. He has sacraficed himself so severly for the benifit of everyone. I understand where your comming from but never forget that in 10 years wikileaks has never got it wrong. This is where the time delay hits in.
This is important because if any time mistake is to occur remember wikileaks repulation will be destroyed overnight.
I beleive there is also some political joseling i think. Remember julian has been unable to see his kids in the whole time since the rape allegation that turned out to be pure lies even the people alleging it dont anymore. This man wants freedom and to have a life back. Alex Jones has never had any freedom taken away.
2 captaincarb 2016-10-05
Jillian Assange never stated their would be a leak October 4th. it was always supposed to be about the 10 year anniversary of wikileaks