Christ almighty, r-politics has official transformed into the internet-branch of the Clinton campaign. A smart move since the official Hillary subreddit obviously flopped. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see this, so reddit admins are bought off or simply allowing it.
1088 2016-10-05 by aaaaa2222
I am voting "none of the above" for the record. This isn't a blue vs. red thing.
202 comments
128 cashcow1 2016-10-05
Probably related to Correct the Record and other PACs spreading propaganda.
94 HitlaryforPrison 2016-10-05
-164 INSIDIOUS_ROOT_BEER 2016-10-05
You guys are deluded. Reddit is on average very liberal. /r/politics is a hillary love fest because, by and large, reddit users cannot fathom a Donald Trump presidency.
This is like going to Drudge and claiming a right wing conspiracy because the comments are Trump leaning.
Is there fuckery going on. Yes. But the headline itself destroys the whole theory here. If correct the record was so powerful, why couldnt they make /r/hillaryclinton take off?
The Bernie Bros are shutting up and taking their medicine. If this fact is surprising to anyone, well, I'd like for you to hear about the importance of investing in gold.
75 edhredhr 2016-10-05
You're neglecting the obvious censorship. Many top posts are deleted with thousands of upvotes for no reason (other than they are critical of Clinton). Other issues are regularly deleted as well, such as criticism of Israel.
43 AdviseMyAdvice 2016-10-05
Including the bans... I've been banned from /r/hillaryclinton, /r/SandersForPresident /r/Kossacks_for_Sanders and /r/Political_Revolution for being anti-Hillary (only one of these bans makes any sense).
And even after all the /r/SandersForPresident bans, that wasn't enough. The sub owner shut down the subreddit and deleted his account after laughing at Bernie supporters, thus silencing a 200k+ subreddit and preventing potential anti-Hillary posts from reaching the top of /r/all
22 drogean2 2016-10-05
The best part is all the spam subs the same people created
Enoughtrumpspam
enoughberniespam
enoughlibertarianspam (lol)
enoughhillaryhate
They literally flood politics with these spam articles and then create a different sub to talk politics
3 Bedichek 2016-10-05
Im banned from /r/askreddit,/r/politics, /r/hillaryclinton and obv /r/EnoughTrumpSpam
they are all agents of the devil.
-19 [deleted] 2016-10-05
[removed]
27 AdviseMyAdvice 2016-10-05
Your account history reveals heavy anti-Sanders and pro-Clinton activity (I'm not posting this comment to you... just so others can see it)
To be fair most Bernie supporters have never had a job and are financial dependants so it's not like they'd know these things
Bernie supporters parents pay for their candidate.
12 HitlaryforPrison 2016-10-05
uh oh, they deleted their account. LOL
7 AdviseMyAdvice 2016-10-05
Hahahah
3 PlsOPLov 2016-10-05
Good name, wish the Hitler Hillary thing would take off in mainstream media though me getting two suicide shots to the back of my head after this comment seem more likely
2 HitlaryforPrison 2016-10-05
lol. donald may be a buffoon, but at least there aren't slews and slews of dead bodies trailing his career.
-30 Karmaisforsuckers 2016-10-05
Thanks for answering my question :)
25 AdviseMyAdvice 2016-10-05
Thanks for proving my point.
2 [deleted] 2016-10-05
[removed]
0 SovereignMan 2016-10-05
Rule 10. No personal attacks. Removed. 1st warning.
0 SovereignMan 2016-10-05
Rule 10. No personal attacks. Removed. 1st warning.
-4 Karmaisforsuckers 2016-10-05
Censorship is evil.
6 horsefartsineyes 2016-10-05
Like hillary
-1 Karmaisforsuckers 2016-10-05
I have a bridge to sell you
1 horsefartsineyes 2016-10-05
Know when you've lost lol
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2016-10-05
This is /r/conspiracy
I win a priori hahahahaah
1 horsefartsineyes 2016-10-05
Yeah cause you made such a solid point that wasn't bullshit at all. Whatever you wanna tell yourself. What's that quote. Can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason into?
-13 okalyddude 2016-10-05
He said there is fuckery. So he didn't ignore it.
Saying it's 100% CTR is frustrating though. People not paid have a bias too.
Or should we suggest that THIS sub is infiltrated by, let's say, Canadian shills that want to deflate the USD by electing Trump? It's just as substantial as claiming that because we know there's paid shilling, that it's ALL paid shilling.
It's not. People hate Trump more than Hillary. And unfortunately are hesitant with third parties. To me, that's the most frustrating part. It's not just shills, people I talk to in real life (give it a shot) are in the same boat.
Before the primary ended, that sub was pro bernie and anti Hillary. And anti Trump. Now just anti Trump
14 watisgoinon_ 2016-10-05
People are being paid to have a bias. That's quite literally what CTR does.
56 gabe_athouse69 2016-10-05
If reddit was very liberal then it wouldn't support Clinton.
14 HillaryBrokeTheLaw 2016-10-05
Ding ding ding
-5 OHoSPARTACUS 2016-10-05
Except the democratic policies this election are easiliy the most liberal of any candidate.
5 bran_dong 2016-10-05
I am reddit and I don't support Hillary.
26 HAESisAMyth 2016-10-05
It'd be too obviously a turf town.
Much easier to buy admins/mods and control the narrative of a sub with real users
23 Tori1313 2016-10-05
Were you even here the last year and a half of r/politics up until CTR got that $5 million in extra funding?
26 HitlaryforPrison 2016-10-05
I used to like r/politics. if anyone tries to defend that sub you know they are CTR, or just a complete fucking idiot.
-24 okalyddude 2016-10-05
Yes, everyone is a paid shill..... EVERYONE
11 HitlaryforPrison 2016-10-05
ok buddy. maybe slow down on the cough syrup-- or maybe don't.
7 HillaryBrokeTheLaw 2016-10-05
It's kool aid
7 HitlaryforPrison 2016-10-05
definitely not "cool" aid
0 okalyddude 2016-10-05
Says "hitlary for prison" lol...
Seriously, not everything is a conspiracy, not everyone is a paid shill, and not everything on either politics OR conspiracy is going to be accurate.
Duh.
1 AMERICAN_TRUCK 2016-10-05
Well obviously... What does that have to do with their username?
1 okalyddude 2016-10-05
That they're not going to be subtle or unbiased.
Seriously, subs like this have a great purpose. But it gets out of hand. The whole "everyone's a paid shill" thing....
2 AMERICAN_TRUCK 2016-10-05
Well in my opinion, there is more than enough evidence that HRC should be convicted and sentenced. Also somebody's username is a very small piece of information that typically lends very little to the identity of the poster. I'm just saying criticize the message not the name of the poster. However I do agree with your clarification that things do get out of hand. This sub tends to attract unhinged people and saboteurs with their own agendas, as well as curious folks and people who seek alternative viewpoints.
1 okalyddude 2016-10-05
How dare you make such a coherent and well reasoned response, good sir!
1 AMERICAN_TRUCK 2016-10-05
Thanks for taking the time to engage and respond, REDDIT NEEDS YOU!
1 okalyddude 2016-10-05
awaaaaaaay!
4 LordPubes 2016-10-05
Some morons do it for free.
4 supersaltyguy 2016-10-05
It's true, many of the people on politics who are belligerent and insultive trolls in their support for Hillary aren't paid off. You know, the ones that argue in circles and result to insults and thinks providing sources of information about your argument is stupid, comes across as extraordinarily belligerent. Believe it or not most aren't shills, the sadder state of affairs OP is that most Americans are just retarded. We can blame "the elites" for pushing shitty foods and vaccines and dumping toxic chemicals on us, but at the end of the day we do it to ourselves. I wonder how many Mexicans built that prison wall knowing it would be a cage for him and his kind, but did it anyways because paychecks.
I wonder how many cameras that guy installed on military missle drones before he thought "this will be used to murder children" but decided fuck it, paycheck. I wonder how many military veterans joined knowing that the war was wrong, knowing that we are the new Nazis come to invade other lands and steal, knowing we would commit atrocities that our future children, if we have future children, would never ever forgive us for if they ever knew. But fuck it, GI bill, I need to pay muh college.
We can complain about the 999 "super elite" (just worthless pedo fags is all they are) all day long but in the end, we do it to ourselves.
Politics is of course shilled and manipulated, no doubt about it. But the sad, pathetic, disheartening truth OP, is that most Americans are just as much of a warhawking soul sucking worthless skeezy pedophilic murderer as Hillary Clinton. Or Trump for that matter.
1 fuster_cluq 2016-10-05
Dude, I'm an American and definitely not all Americans are like that. Most people just try to fucking get through the day
1 okalyddude 2016-10-05
yes. exactly. this is reddit, and conspiracy / politics isn't even representative of reddit as a whole, let alone society as a whole.
It's not like either place has all the answers.
1 supersaltyguy 2016-10-05
I never said "all" Americans. But the idiots are a large enough majority.
1 okalyddude 2016-10-05
That's what I mean. People have opinions and don't always have all the facts.
Do you honestly think everyone on this sub is right about everything....? Seriously?
People all over are right and wrong, and the truth is getting harder and harder to find.
But keep making blanket statements and voting on feels.
/sigh - more a rant to others than to you.
22 plusskating 2016-10-05
I have yet to see one positive post about Jill Stein... Ron Paul has spoken out a number of times about her and how great her policies are. So explain to me again how r/politics is unbiased. Shit I even posted a demographic the other day on post/up vote manipulation in one of their threads and had over 800 upvotes. Today that same post went down to 2... anything that gains traction calling out bias is down voted to oblivion wants it reaches the top of the thread.
-1 okalyddude 2016-10-05
Keep posting about Jill in that sub and others!
22 Called-the-hobbit 2016-10-05
Hilarious.
You routinely see the same talking points. One of my favorites is
..."I used to be a Bernie supporter, but after hearing Hillary say so and so, I've officially thrown all my support behind her"
9 woohlife 2016-10-05
you forgot the exclamation points. "i'm now with her!!"
9 drogean2 2016-10-05
"you obviously weren't a true Bernie supporter or you would swear allegiance to Hillary..... (are you convinced by my insults to switch to her yet?)"
-6 jeffinRTP 2016-10-05
I see the same talking points against hillary and for trump. It goes both ways.
If people dislike the subredit don't follow it. No difference then a movie, tv show, news show, etc.
15 captaincarb 2016-10-05
reddit is so pro Hillary that she dominates r/politics but not enough people support her to get r/hillaryclinton running. So obviously correct the record isn't influencing r/politics. great explanation using logic to back up your conclusion
/s
13 HillaryBrokeTheLaw 2016-10-05
Hillary isn't a liberal, and citing redddit's liberal bias is a red herring when a lot of redditors are libertarians or some such ilk.
-8 INSIDIOUS_ROOT_BEER 2016-10-05
they aren't though. There may be more libertarians in the mix than typical cross-section, but i wouldn't call them "a lot."
Get used to it. As we get closer to the election, it will get more divisive.
5 HillaryBrokeTheLaw 2016-10-05
Do you actually have any demographic and statistical evidence of redditors and their political persuasions, or you talking out of your ass like I am?
-15 INSIDIOUS_ROOT_BEER 2016-10-05
Do you have evidence that /r/politics reflects anything other than redditors voting or do you accept OP talking out of his ass?
The headline says "it doesn't take a rocket scientist" to see there has been corruption, with no evidence. But that is probably fine for you because it comports with your chosen narrative.
7 HillaryBrokeTheLaw 2016-10-05
I'm not defending what the OP is saying, just criticizing you. Nice attempt at deflection though.
-6 INSIDIOUS_ROOT_BEER 2016-10-05
I was giving an alternate explanation for an unfounded claim by OP. Nice attempt at holding claims you don't like at a higher standard though.
6 HillaryBrokeTheLaw 2016-10-05
With an unfounded claim.
You suck at arguing bro. I'm sorry I hurt your fee-fees (not really). Maybe you should quit drinking and stay high 24/7 like I am. Marijuana is such a better drug than alcohol.
5 minda_spK 2016-10-05
Further: Why would correct the record even care if /r/hillaryclinton took off? They're alleged goal is not to win over people already supporting Hillary, but winning over independents and stating rebuttals to attacks on her.
1 fuster_cluq 2016-10-05
I don't think they try to convince anyone to support Hillary. They just try to discredit anyone who doesn't support her.
5 perfect_pickles 2016-10-05
the ONLY people there were paid HRC people, two comments per thread at the best, often zero replies or comments in a thread.
1 jerkITwithRIGHTYnewb 2016-10-05
Upvoted. I don't understand why people think it's strange. Whether we like it or not, is a two part system. We can and should work to change that fact, but it didn't work out this time. We can now practice American democracy and shoot ourselves in the left foot or the right, dealers choice, it is a democracy after all.
1 IsHanselHotRightNow 2016-10-05
The official Hillary sub didn't take off because no one subscribed to it. That's even more evidence for the fact that Reddit as a whole doesn't like Hillary.
1 INSIDIOUS_ROOT_BEER 2016-10-05
We don't. Have you not noticed, it's all anti-Trump and in case you haven't noticed, it seems like it is well deserved hate for Trump.
Clinton is just the guy by default. But on the scale of evil from hitler being -10 and Lincoln being +10, clinton is at least on the positive side of the scale. Trump is well into the negatives.
65 GeoSol 2016-10-05
Just remember there are few if any swing states this election.
Please VOTE, but give a 3rd party a chance. I'm going with the green party.
Also Google seems to be altering all suggestive searches to be very pro Hillary.
Weird how last century it was the information agr, and now we're heavily in the disinformation age.
Search engines used to try and outdo their competition, now they're in reverse and removing data and help that could hurt certain parties that are willing to pay for it.
22 [deleted] 2016-10-05
I'm going with Johnson. 4 year libertarian here excited about the opportunity for both the Green Party and Libertarian Party despite conflicting ideology. This 2 party system is a breeding ground for corruption.
15 R0yGeeB1v 2016-10-05
Gary has made a fool of himself in several interviews. He has such little understanding of the geopolitical scene it's embarrassing.
1 TheSonofLiberty 2016-10-05
I mean, if he was somehow elected president, he could easily get a meeting of dozens of experts to fill him in. Its not like presidents need to be experts on every single topic.
Its not like he has the funds for an expert team of advisers to prep him before every public appearance like the candidates of the main 2 parties
-4 SQUID_FUCKER 2016-10-05
He doesn't need the funds for an expert team of advisors. He has not even the simplest understanding right now. The idea of getting a meeting of 'experts to fill him in' is ridiculous. Right now is not the time to vote third party to make a statement. Certainly not a vote for a guy like Gary Johnson. This type of thinking is part of the problem.
0 TheSonofLiberty 2016-10-05
Lmao, that is literally the game plan for any politician with access to knowledgeable people either by money or by connections - what is easier, asking a group of people for their facts and opinions about a topic, or reading dozens of articles and books about a topic?
It never is. The republicans are always the eternal enemy and the democrats are always the good guys (or vise versa). Voting third party has been insulted for decades, let alone 2016.
i'm not even arguing in favor of Johnson, I'm just arguing against the silly notion that not knowing exact details on one out of millions of topics is somehow the worst thing in the world when politicians will have dozens of advisers giving them research, facts, and opinions on those same topics.
0 SQUID_FUCKER 2016-10-05
Dude, he couldn't even name a single other political leader from another country he respected. Not a single person.
10 GeoSol 2016-10-05
I agree. It would be nice if our government represented both by class, as well as by region.
Different states matter less than certain areas.
I.e. North California and Southern California. Or any state sparsly populated has priorities that greatly differ between people in cities, and people in rural areas.
We desperately need a Constitutional convention, and a rework of our democracy from the ground up.
Let's take the last 250 years as inspiration, and build something better.
4 [deleted] 2016-10-05
Thanks for recognizing this. I myself am from Kansas and it's so easy to see.
1 GeoSol 2016-10-05
Yeah, I'd assume rural people there as well as many neighboring states, have much more similar values, compared to those that live in the city.
5 ttufan09 2016-10-05
Johnson is in no way a libertarian, nor is Weld. Both lean hard to the liberal side, with Weld openly stating he believes Clinton is best suited to be president - not his own running mate...
5 chickchickyeah 2016-10-05
Johnson is not libertarian and it drives me crazy that people are pushing a vote for him when all it does is help Hilary. I'm voting for Trump and independent down the rest of the ticket. Hopefully the next presidential run will have a real libertarian to vote for.
5 tribrn 2016-10-05
Depending on where you are. Kansas? Trump gets those electoral votes for sure, so you might as well make a "statement" vote. Ohio? May be a tossup, so now you have to worry about if your principles are worth it. It's only in these close states that a vote for third party means a vote for Clinton or Trump.
0 chickchickyeah 2016-10-05
I'm in a state that is more than likely going with Tump. I would like to make a statement but I really don't trust polls so I don't feel as confident that Tump would take my state.
0 supersaltyguy 2016-10-05
So you support expanding NSA spying powers, mass censorhip of the Internet, resigning in the Patriot Act and the 911 state of emergency that essentially places the country under martial law, as well as being okay with the fact that he was listed in the names of the note book that convicted pedophile and child rapist Jeffrey Epstien where they flew to a private island where they raped child prostitutes, of whom trump referred to as, and I quote, "a great guy and a great friend."
The same Trump that posted a 990 million dollar loss in one year that he has never gotten back that can be verified in any way, which happened after multiple casino hotels he ran into bankruptcy and ended up owning hundreds of millions to the backers? The same Trump who's most stable part of his career was hosting a reality TV show on Fox network?
That's the guy who you want to rule us? Really? That's the guy you think is an independent? The one with multiple bankers he already has planned to put into office? That guy is independent?
You people are fucking delusional.
0 chickchickyeah 2016-10-05
Username checks out. I will have a civil discussion to debate the candidates and issues, but attacking me already shuts that door.
1 supersaltyguy 2016-10-05
I'm not attacking you I'm just stating a fact, you Trumpettes are delusional and don't understand how mislead you are. You don't care to have a discussion either, fuck off I know you're full of shit, if I left off that last sentence you wouldn't respond at all, just ignore it. Go back to your the_donald sub so you can have Milo and jcm pull another scam attempt on you.
1 chickchickyeah 2016-10-05
No the tone of all of your posts has been snarky. You sound like you're 15 and can't comprehend the complexities of the world. Do I like additional surveillance? No. Do I want censorship? No. I want more opportunities for Americans and less debt. The best candidate for that is Trump. Is he my ideal candidate? No, but I'll take the best we've got. I would never vote Hilary because of how dishonest and corrupt she is. And she is going to expand government way more than trump would. Gary Johnson is nowhere close to a libertarian. He is being pushed by the establishment republicans to give hilary more votes to win because they need their uniparty corrupt system to work. And on the tax issue, I'm not sure if you've noticed one of the subs I post in, but it's accounting because I'm a CPA. Carrying operating losses forward for many years to offset gains is allowed by the tax code. We are all laughing about the ignorance of people and this issue. If you are wealthy and can afford good accountants and lawyers you can substantially reduce, if not eliminate taxes you need to pay. Go look at some of the public companies effective tax rates and see how similar they are to your tax rate because of their write offs and deductions.
2 [deleted] 2016-10-05
Actually evidence shows Johnson is hurting Clinton and is a major reason for the race being so narrow. Johnson and Weld are the libertarian parties best chance at getting federal funding next year if they reach 5% of the popular vote. Not telling you to vote for him, but just trying to give you my perspective as to why I'm voting for him.
2 chickchickyeah 2016-10-05
Do you have a link for the johnson hurting clinton? Im curious about reading it. Everyone i know touting Johnson is a republican that is listening to the msm about Trump. That is a good point about the funding. I guess I'm holding out hope that Trump isn't a part of the system and can do something to help. If this was uniparty vs uniparty then Johnson would have my vote.
1 [deleted] 2016-10-05
This might not be the best source but I have seen this multiple times Johnson takes votes from Clinton This is from about a month ago, but keep in mind, a wikileaks dump could bring a wave of Clinton jumpers to vote for Gary Johnson. I don't blame you for holding out hope with Trump. He has really shaken things up and I can see it being a positive change.
1 drewshaver 2016-10-05
As conflicting the ideology is, I've found there are definitely ways to compromise (been testing with libs at work). For example, they would be good with replacing the over bureaucratic welfare system with a basic income. Also, they are OK with a cap-n-trade program to limit carbon emissions. And both parties want to remove all subsidies for corporations.
1 ARCHA1C 2016-10-05
It's a good start, but won't do shit if we keep the FPTP vote.
It would take decades for a third party to rise to any significant status if we keep FPTP.
12 [deleted] 2016-10-05
it doesn't matter, the votes don't count, and the sooner we admit it the better off we'll be for the future.
you boys and girls still talking about "voting" might as well be in Russia or DPRK talking about "voting" and "swing states" while 1 or 2 families pass the highest offices and appointments back and forth between their wives, sons, and business associates/campaign donors/family friends (which is what Trump is to both the Bush and Clinton families). The institutions of government have been seized by criminals and anti-democratic subversive elements of our society, and they're not accepting your "votes" anymore. See the past 30-40 years worth of elections for source/proof.
your votes don't matter, they don't count, they will always provide false results that appear to show a "close-run race" (like 54/46, or 51/49, or 48/52, like the current trump/clinton II polls, and like the way they scammed the primaries between sanders/clinton), so that their fraud seems believable.
4 GeoSol 2016-10-05
Oh it's much worse than that. Worldwide oligarchy has been present for 100s of years. The only thing threatening to dislodge it, is the power of corportations, but most of them with any power are owned by the oligarchy.
So around and around we go, chasing our tales and missing the point.
Yet you so have to admire the strategy of using plots just above the understanding of most people.
Only if more people played chess and poker, they could strengthen their brain to the point of seeing the truth.
6 drogean2 2016-10-05
I find it disgusting Bernie and even Obama are flat out telling everyone how to vote
And to not vote third party
And even attacking the third party candidates themselves
5 GeoSol 2016-10-05
I try to find it more amusing than disgusting.
If you stand back and watch, you get a much better view of the web of corruption they try and drag is into accepting.
5 minda_spK 2016-10-05
I find it miserably unethical. The purpose of a democracy is to vote for the candidate you think is best, and saying you shouldn't because "they can't win" just seems so unamerican
1 CrazyMike366 2016-10-05
Considering OP very specifically said s/he'd be voting "none of the above" I'm assuming OP is Nevadan where it's a constitutionally valid ballot choice. If that's the case, OP is in fact in one of the few toss-up states.
That said, it might not matter. 538's most recent analysis suggests the electorate is so pro-Clinton that she could lose every toss-up state and still walk away with a majority of electoral votes.
1 GeoSol 2016-10-05
Yeah, last count I saw suggested she was likely to get over 300 votes from the electoral college, and Trump still has weeks to shove his foot further down his own throat.
Even Republicans are leaning Democrat these days. Although to be fair, Clinton is more Republican than Democrat in reality.
33 TurnerJ5 2016-10-05
I dunno I get downvoted for reminding people of every Hillary fact we've been elucidated with so far this year in every subreddit but this one, political_revolution, jillstein, and socialism. CTR is really aiming at helping the already-short term-memory-deficient American population fully forget why Hillary is a dangerous elitist neoliberal.
30 overthrow23 2016-10-05
Going to r/politics would lead one to believe that almost every Redditor is a rabid, pathological Hillary fan.
But when you go to r/HillaryClinton, it's lame, near-devoid of enthusiasm by comparison. Some might even call it "low energy".
The reason: CTR folks aren't being paid to make r/HillaryClinton great, but to make the rest of Reddit suck, and they're succeeding.
7 chickchickyeah 2016-10-05
I could deal with the posts for a while, but today when every single post that hit the front page was against Pence and for Kaine, I unsubscribed. I like to read all kinds of different views but that sub only has one to give.
4 FavoriteCentaurMoe 2016-10-05
Politics is way more rabidly anti trump than pro Clinton.
19 Potss 2016-10-05
LOL @ CTR trying their BS in here. You have no power here.
15 Soylent_Gringo 2016-10-05
And remember kids!
A vote for "the lesser of two evils" is still a vote for evil!
14 911bodysnatchers322 2016-10-05
Why are you guys still going there? I've not been to anywhere on reddit other than a few 'trusted' subs because I know the other subs we have been complaining about are totally taken over by bodysnatchers and bodyposeurs
13 oblivioustoobvious 2016-10-05
Some try to fight the propaganda / echo chamber rather than let it grow.
17 Afrobean 2016-10-05
CTR-controlled subreddits often ban anyone who says anything even slightly against Hillary. Including r/politics.
8 HillaryBrokeTheLaw 2016-10-05
I say plenty of anti-hillary things on /r/politics, but I get downvoted a fuckton now. I don't break any rules, and if I am trying to call someone stupid, I generally use their own words against them.
But it is extremely tiresome to even try.
3 Afrobean 2016-10-05
I was always careful to not break any rules in r/politics as well. I had heard the mods had trigger fingers and never ever called anyone a shill or anything that could even remotely be sen as breaking the rules. After maybe like a month or two of going on and on about election fraud and exit polls in the comments however, I was eventually permanently banned with a gaslighting lie in the ban notice.
1 HillaryBrokeTheLaw 2016-10-05
That sucks. I guess I have been more lucky than I am aware.
1 ArcherGladIDidntSay 2016-10-05
Yep. Coming off of a 21 day ban from politics right now as it were. The first few bans were for supposedly calling out another user for being a shill (even though they obviously are biased towards HRC), but my most recent ban was for "insinuating another user is a shill". The offense is already subjective in nature, but it's insane to me that other users can't call out the users with <1 month old accounts posting exclusively pro-HRC/anti-Trump rhetoric. The politics subreddit is a joke, but I suppose I'll keep fighting the madness.
5 LOLZebra 2016-10-05
Last I heard they had 9500 people banned in the last few months. Probably well over 10k at this point.
8 crochet_masterpiece 2016-10-05
Don't bother, /r/politics is literally an echo chamber of CTR shills pulling each other off. There's nobody else left. It's blatantly obvious to even the most casual observer.
8 oblivioustoobvious 2016-10-05
Did you happen to see it right after Clinton fainted? It almost looked normal until CTR found the next talking point.
4 JabberwockyPhD 2016-10-05
I like to read the enemy's spin.
2 911bodysnatchers322 2016-10-05
Turn on the television then!
Lol. No really.
2 JabberwockyPhD 2016-10-05
Yikes that's like watching American idol. The lights and gloss. I like to read my propaganda not watch it.
4 negajake 2016-10-05
I lurk /r/all pretty heavily when I'm not looking at anything specific. Sometimes you come across fun things, but 90% of it is shit.
1 CTRShill1786 2016-10-05
Theres some real discussion to be had, if you sort the articles by controversial, and maybe the comments as well. 99% seems to be shills though, so its an echo-chamber mostly.
-19 RealRepub 2016-10-05
Lol. We saw trump the Demented. You lose.
8 BeastPenguin 2016-10-05
What?
Edit: Oh, nice post history...
7 ColonelDwight 2016-10-05
Over the past few days this place has been a little fishy too.
6 MasterAssFace 2016-10-05
I've been saying this for weeks in that subreddit and surprisingly I don't get down voted much, it isn't that the users want this, it's just mods deleting all posts that aren't anti trump or pro hillary.
6 42O2 2016-10-05
A couple weeks ago, r/politics suddenly went back to normal for a few days. It was like CTR's website was down and the shills didn't know what to do with themselves without their instructions from David Brock.
Now they're back in full force. The mods obviously are being paid off. This is deception, pure and simple, and it should be illegal for political campaigns. It's false advertising on a grand scale and Reddit is more than happy to participate.
5 [deleted] 2016-10-05
[deleted]
-4 rings_of_saturn 2016-10-05
You have no evidence that he is working for Clinton.
5 elbanditofrito 2016-10-05
No evidence? Sounds like it's on its way to the front page of /r/conspiracy
4 woodforfire 2016-10-05
yes, and this sub has officially transformed into the internet branch of the trump campaign, despite r/thedonald being so popular. it's fucking gross.
it doesn't matter who gets elected. the ball's already in play.
31 ArcherGladIDidntSay 2016-10-05
The SandersForPresident sub was equally popular. It's insane how bad the HRC campaign is concerning enticing former Bernie supporters. I don't know a single Bernie supporter who is now supporting Hillary since the nomination. She's just the worst fucking candidate and I don't know how her corruption and collusion have continued for so long. When is the tipping point?
16 greetingearthlings 2016-10-05
Hillary was rightfully so painted as an enemy to Sanders in the primaries. You can't just switch that off.
7 ArcherGladIDidntSay 2016-10-05
It seemed to me that Bernie was painted as "the enemy" during the primaries. Many supporters were vocal about HRC's corruption and collusion, but her supporters weren't the ones being attacked. People were and still are seeking answers about Hillary's questionable actions and past, though the answers never come. HRC and her campaign have been on the attack since day 1.
8 woodforfire 2016-10-05
i'm a former bernie supporter. you couldn't pay me a million dollars to support hillary, though i DO hate trump much more, so if i drink enough i MIGHT give her my vote just to not give him one more vote.
but i think i'm voting Giant Meteor this year.
2 Called-the-hobbit 2016-10-05
Thank you. This. Absolutely this. I expect to hear more Bernie supporters say this, than the fake spin you routinely see on the politics subreddit where they all say
"I used to support Bernie, but now I'm throwing all of my support behind Hillary. I'm officially with her"
1 woodforfire 2016-10-05
remember, you won't make ANY difference by not voting. like i said, i hope the whole fucking world burns. but i hate donald trump enough to possibly throw that bitchbag my useless vote just so he doesn't get it.
i hope they both burn. i hope it all burns. fuck this place.
4 drogean2 2016-10-05
Nobody in their right mind saw the DNC corruption first hand and now thinks the MSM isn't painting Donald the same way they did Bernie
Every single newspaper/celebrity/CEO and politician is forcing Hillary down our throats
I never believed in blatant US propaganda until this year
I hated Trump during the primary and though he was racist who hated all Mexicans... Because it's all I knew from the MSM
But I was skeptical and started to listening to his speeches first hand rather than hearing how the news wants me to interpret them and have already jumped ship fully from the Democratic party
Now I will vote them into the Senate but never hillary
There is no way anyone who wants any change whatsoever will support the DNC taking the executive branch
btw here's my fucking badge CTR
-1 captaincarb 2016-10-05
look at Bernies positions on trade and compare them to trump's positions on trade they are almost identical.
I was pro Bernie aswell but after hearing him talk of breaking up banks and lamenting Wal-Mart for all of the welfare paid out to their employees then watching him turn around and endorse a former Wal-Mart board member and recipient of $700,000 in speaking Fee's from Goldman Sachs really made me think he was controlled opposition from the start.
Instead of endorsing someone who's positions on trade he completely agreed with he endorsed the exact antithesis of his policies, all because DAS RAYCISIS
1 supersaltyguy 2016-10-05
You're at - 4 with no one refuting your statements, I think you burned some of the delusional berniebros
Bernie was and always will be a hack fruad.
6 cuatro-20 2016-10-05
Yup I was a staunch Bernie supporter and no way in hell I would ever give my vote to Shillary, she can pry it from my cold dead hands.... I'm sure she would have no problem with that though. I don't think I've met anyone who was supporting Bernie that's now supporting Hillary, they all hate her.
-16 popozuda247 2016-10-05
All my Bernie supporting friends are voting Clinton. It's the right thing to do despite all the caterwauling on these subs against it.
6 cmkelley33 2016-10-05
Right thing to do??? Probabally the same thing lemmings think right before they all finish running off a cliff. Fuck hrc
3 captaincarb 2016-10-05
or
pick one
-19 popozuda247 2016-10-05
All my Bernie supporting friends are voting Clinton. It's the right thing to do despite all the caterwauling on these subs against it.
6 ArcherGladIDidntSay 2016-10-05
"Right thing to do". By which standards? I don't support HRC, but that doesn't mean I'm a Trump supporter. Neither will receive my vote.
4 cuatro-20 2016-10-05
Lol subtle
15 Italics_RS 2016-10-05
Former Bernie supporter checking in. Still hate Trump. Still hate Hillary.
8 BeastPenguin 2016-10-05
Maybe because people here are pissed that this woman has gotten away with so much bullshit? This sub hates corruption.
3 hurtsdonut_ 2016-10-05
This. You want to talk about r/politics being biased for Clinton? At least on politics you can say what you think. Over on the_donald you're banned instantly if you say anything the slightest bit they don't agree with.
3 captaincarb 2016-10-05
it's almost like /the_donald is a pro donald trump sub and r/politics is a general politics board or something. You can get banned from r/hillaryclinton for litterally quoting Hillary Clinton... try posting about super predators there and see what happens.
really made me think.
-1 Called-the-hobbit 2016-10-05
Sure, you can say what you think on r/politics
Until you get downvoted to the point where nobody sees whatever it is you're trying to say.
3 [deleted] 2016-10-05
dude fuck donald trump. if you don't think that guy is going to take bribes, then you should start pulling your head out of your ass now, because it's so far up there that it's gonna take til christmas for you to get it out.
0 edhredhr 2016-10-05
yea, /r/thedonald leaks all over the place. But they don't last long around here.
4 [deleted] 2016-10-05
Trump is a Clinton plant, after all.
4 greetingearthlings 2016-10-05
I'm sure CTR plays some roll. But I'm not surprised the progressive young community of reddit would take such a one sided stand toward keeping scary Trump from becoming president. On the other hand, it's disgusting that they can turn such a blind eye to Clinton's illegal misgivings and crookedness. I'm voting 3rd party per usual, especially since I live in a state without a chance of swinging.
4 90065 2016-10-05
I think CTR has effectively shaped the narrative for lot of left-leaning people. They are still there for sure, but a lot of people are doing the shilling for free because they have bought into it pretty hard. It's sad that we can't have discourse without psychological manipulation. Notice that both Hillary and Trump have started slinging mud, name calling, just really pandering with cheap emotionally charged arguments. At least when Sanders was still viable there was a semblance of critical thinking online. It's devolved into the childish Drumpf vs Killery narrative that just completely trivializes the hardships facing so many people in this country. Sad. Really really really sad.
3 ZapPowerz 2016-10-05
When your livelihood depends on ignoring certain things, youre going to ignore certain things.
4 endprism 2016-10-05
Fucking /u/spez that cuck is allowing it
3 okalyddude 2016-10-05
By none of the above I hope you mean third party...
3 doughboy666 2016-10-05
Well that would be why all but 1 mod are new mods less than 1 year old.
3 jacks1000 2016-10-05
/r/politics has ALWAYS been a left wing progressive sub. Sometimes they allow some diversity of opinion during the primaries, but once the general comes around they ALWAYS support the establishment Democrat and they will censor and ban anyone who successfully pushes against the narrative.
/r/politics is such a joke even reddit itself - a far left wing website owned by a family of wealthy Democrats - took /r/politics off of the default sub list because it was making the entire site look bad.
3 chi-hi 2016-10-05
Ctr will ruin reddit. The elites are trying to claw there way into power on the internet.
3 Theres_A_FAP_4_That 2016-10-05
I notice I'm less angry now that I unsubscribed from politics. Now only /r/atheism makes me angry, but it's the kind of angry I like.
2 TutonicKnight 2016-10-05
voting libertarian this year
2 StringyLow 2016-10-05
I just noticed that my posts aren't being displayed to others in r/poltics. I'm interested to find out when that started happening.
And two downvotes in r/conspiracy for mentioning that fact. I guess I'll have to start spreading ideas and expanding awareness with daily created throwaway accounts.
1 NutritionResearch 2016-10-05
Yep, I check every comment and post now in certain subs to verify that they are showing up. I then have to periodically check later to make sure they weren't manually removed as well. It's bullshit, but it's something that we have to deal with.
Sometimes they even remove comments that have gotten a lot of traction, such as this and this. They especially hate it when you spread credible information about shilling.
Reddit is one of the best places to spread information. It's worth it to keep going even when we have to deal with bullshit like this.
2 wanktarded 2016-10-05
/r/politics is indeed utter dross at the moment and is nothing more than Clinton good/Trump bad... but at times this sub feels like it's turned into an offshoot of /r/thedonald, time to unsub and maybe come back after your election is over and things have returned to normal.
3 drogean2 2016-10-05
Is it difficult to really think the 250k former Bernie sanders subscribers with no where to go didn't become part of the new 250k Trump supporters after?
Because we sure as fuck didn't join /r/HillaryClinton
Guess what? We exist
2 wanktarded 2016-10-05
I'm not entirely sure what point you're trying to make and I genuinely have no dog in the fight with regards to your elections, I unsubbed from /r/politics some months ago and I've done the same with this sub. Be back for a browse whenever the elections are over and hope the content being posted has returned to some level of normalcy.
1 hopefullydepressed 2016-10-05
Nobody's going to that sub who isn't already drinking the kool aid. Fuck'm, let them have their circlejerk.
And what exactly are the admins allowing? Couldn't that be said about a lot of subs? I'm sure some in /r/politics wonder why they let /r/conspiracy post things that you find here.
1 Dishmayhem 2016-10-05
Many of the comments in /r/politics read like bots (IMO). If true, it fits your theory.
1 Mr-Krinkles 2016-10-05
Without knowing or looking it up, is there some kind of Reddit TOS against this? To be able to hold a popular subreddit name hostage for your own agendas?
1 bfwilley 2016-10-05
Well what do you expect the checks from soros via the clintion foundation to be written off as charitable donations has and will continue.
1 Locke_Smithe 2016-10-05
Not surprised. r/pol was the Bernie hive, and ever since he lubed up and bent over for big H the rest of the dem cucks followed suit.
Throw in her dystopic legion of astro-turf squads from straight out of a William Gibson novel and there you have it.
1 perfect_pickles 2016-10-05
"flopped" doesn't do it justice, comatose like HRC on 'treason day'.
1 Svenarchy 2016-10-05
All I know about this election you seppos are having is that it is so important that even the dead have decided to weigh in and show their support for Hillary Clinton.
1 TheRealIsNow 2016-10-05
Funny how legalization threads make the first page of /r/politics even though their explicit candidate is against it.
0 nail_phile 2016-10-05
Isn't there a giant chasm between "bought off" and "simply allowing it"?
Politics and policy geeks (those who would be mods on r/politics) are apt to be pro Clinton, no?
0 VonnegutIce9 2016-10-05
That explains her own bad week where every headline was anti-Clinton. Trump has way more scandals surrounding him, and much less nuanced scandals. Especially recently. Cuba embargo. Taxes. Charity abuses. Not to mention the endless comments he makes precisely because that's how he grabs media attention. Your conspiracy sucks shit.
0 jorson 2016-10-05
If they didn't allow it wouldn't someone cry out censorship anyways?
-1 zotakul 2016-10-05
Most reddit users are in their 20s. Most ppl in their 20s have a ton of debt from student loans. What would you do when offered money for selling a little bit of your soul, for a cause you probably believe in anyway?
3 bananapeel 2016-10-05
Word on the street that the going rate for a mod is $28,000. An awful lot of us would take the money quietly and turn the other cheek.
1 CTRShill1786 2016-10-05
Same for any "old trusted" accounts they were rumored to be buying. I think most students/people just starting their career will take the money.
-1 kamspy 2016-10-05
So just a little bit of my soul?
-1 sporkineye 2016-10-05
all that really has to be done to regain control of the people is control the Internet. with it we were strong and united. now we have missed our chance, and our children will become slaves.
-1 spacedust666 2016-10-05
everything I post on /r/politics gets removed
2 spacedust666 2016-10-05
or downvoted by CTR (just like here..............)
1 mcvey 2016-10-05
You should read the submission guidelines before posting articles to it, I can see from your history that most of your submissions have heavily editorialized titles which is against one of the rules.
1 spacedust666 2016-10-05
its hard to follow rules :/
1 mcvey 2016-10-05
Then don't complain about having stuff removed.
1 spacedust666 2016-10-05
statements are not complaints...just sayin'
-4 therapest 2016-10-05
The same happened when Ron Paul ran in 2008. Liberals are really really against Trump. Can you blame them?
edit: Sensationalist embellishments run both ways. You people see only what you want to see.
4 lars2458 2016-10-05
It seems like more than liberals are against Trump.
-8 anamericanhero 2016-10-05
IMHO, as long they have a different model number, that's all that's necessary. This really peaked my interest, cause I hadn't thought about it much. But if you're buying a big ticket item like a TV, I'd stay away from Walmart. This would be especially important if you're buying oil for your car. The oil might not be as good. Tires might wear out faster, engine might wear out faster. I looked at the oil packaging today as Walmart, and some of the gallon sizes are special packaged for Walmart. IMHO, I'd recommend being very careful what you're buying at Walmart, especially if it something as critical as oil or tires. There has to be some reason you can get an oil change so much cheaper at Walmart.
-9 ZapPowerz 2016-10-05
ITT: people that support a corrupt government and think the government is capable of fixing itself.
No, Bernie wasnt going to do jack shit and your support of him was a waste of time. Same with Ron Paul, Johnson, Stein,Trump, Obama, Romney, Clinton.
7 Afrobean 2016-10-05
Wow you're right, I guess we better just do nothing then and sit by as our mafia-run banana republic goes down in flames
-3 ZapPowerz 2016-10-05
Thats my plan! So far, so good.
-10 bbiggs32 2016-10-05
This sub has turned into the crazy Clinton conspiracy crew.
Inarguably.
8 BeastPenguin 2016-10-05
But is it warranted? This sub has always been about conspiracies, why would we not focus on one of the most controversial politicians ever?
-7 bbiggs32 2016-10-05
Conspiracies are fine. But I just wish the ones talked about here weren't all directed at Clinton.
She's got her problems, that's for sure. But it often feels like beating a dead horse.
-11 Nate_E_7 2016-10-05
Y'all realize that if you go in their up vote the stuff you want then it would be what you want and most of what they're reporting is truth they're just leaving out other parts
Edit: if you explain how Reddit works you get downvoted christ
5 [deleted] 2016-10-05
No. These are paid shills that's sole purpose is promote their own propaganda while surprrssing their oppositions.
-11 blindedbyhindsight 2016-10-05
if you are not voting against trump, then you are a part of the problem.
And you are totally right; this isn't a blue vs red thing, it's just common sense & common decency .
-13 lars2458 2016-10-05
Who really cares?
Just don't follow r/politics.
Ever stop to think Hillary is just more popular or is literally everything a censoring conspiracy?
If you're voting third party in protest, follow up with local government and work year round to make changes. You aren't accomplishing anything by whining once every four years and trashing your vote.
7 ArcherGladIDidntSay 2016-10-05
It seemed to me that Bernie was painted as "the enemy" during the primaries. Many supporters were vocal about HRC's corruption and collusion, but her supporters weren't the ones being attacked. People were and still are seeking answers about Hillary's questionable actions and past, though the answers never come. HRC and her campaign have been on the attack since day 1.
5 [deleted] 2016-10-05
No. These are paid shills that's sole purpose is promote their own propaganda while surprrssing their oppositions.
-7 bbiggs32 2016-10-05
Conspiracies are fine. But I just wish the ones talked about here weren't all directed at Clinton.
She's got her problems, that's for sure. But it often feels like beating a dead horse.
3 drogean2 2016-10-05
Is it difficult to really think the 250k former Bernie sanders subscribers with no where to go didn't become part of the new 250k Trump supporters after?
Because we sure as fuck didn't join /r/HillaryClinton
Guess what? We exist
7 chickchickyeah 2016-10-05
I could deal with the posts for a while, but today when every single post that hit the front page was against Pence and for Kaine, I unsubscribed. I like to read all kinds of different views but that sub only has one to give.
4 FavoriteCentaurMoe 2016-10-05
Politics is way more rabidly anti trump than pro Clinton.
1 INSIDIOUS_ROOT_BEER 2016-10-05
We don't. Have you not noticed, it's all anti-Trump and in case you haven't noticed, it seems like it is well deserved hate for Trump.
Clinton is just the guy by default. But on the scale of evil from hitler being -10 and Lincoln being +10, clinton is at least on the positive side of the scale. Trump is well into the negatives.