Even his rape isn't as bad as his ongoing relationship with pederast Epstein and their frequent trips aboard the Lolita express, Hillary's padowan relationship to sweet ole genocidist Henry Kissinger, or the fact that in the 80s Bill as governor signed off on knowingly tainted prison blood collected by a friend whose derivative plasma factor 8 pharma product gave some 60,000 hemophiliac children in canada and europe AIDS and Hepatitis C, and then allowed Bayer to take the blame. This last story to me is the most important because it shows them as psychopaths, who present themselves as hard-scrabble political bumpkins from arkansas who worked their way up in the world.
I want to be very clear. Anyone who supports the Clintons after knowing these things is an immoral person. I've already decided to never contact my uncle again, because he will not respond to me after I sent him the Arkansas Prison Blood scandal documentary and all the evidence of my research. He calls it 'propaganda' instead of History.
So he has revealed himself in my mind, to be a psychopath. Sheridan says, 'never contact again'. I'm down with that. He was a crap uncle anyway--stole my fries and such. If he can't trust his nephew who is trying hard to prevent another Hitler from rising to power (and yes I do mean that), then I can't help him. Contrariwise, he's compared Trump to hitler. I don't have any evidence to suggest Trump has done anything close to what the Clintons have done. He's conducted lawfare on people (used his money to tie people up in court, even if he's going to lose), which is shitty and unethical and bullying, but it's legal and he's probably had reasons to do it. What the clintons have done is both illegal and immoral.
Throwaway Twitter account and follow every single MSM account and 'journalist' account and counter each one of their posts with the facts, while asking why they aren't covering 'insert sourced story'
Do the same on MSM websites that allow comments at the bottom (this is wht NPR got rid of theirs because people were calling out their false illusion narrative bullshit)
Do the same thing on YouTube and reddit, and that's how you fight the ww3 information war we are currently in
Yea and Trumps main line of attack for women is how can you support her when her husband is a rapist just lost all credibility. Both are attacks are about things done over a decade ago.
lol saying pussy and actually raping someone are very different. That's low on the totem pole but it forces him to address bullshit instead of focusing on the real issues.
15 comments
6 Thizzlebot 2016-10-09
They will grill Trump for saying "pussy" over a decade ago so it makes bill clintons rape look not as bad.
4 911bodysnatchers322 2016-10-09
Even his rape isn't as bad as his ongoing relationship with pederast Epstein and their frequent trips aboard the Lolita express, Hillary's padowan relationship to sweet ole genocidist Henry Kissinger, or the fact that in the 80s Bill as governor signed off on knowingly tainted prison blood collected by a friend whose derivative plasma factor 8 pharma product gave some 60,000 hemophiliac children in canada and europe AIDS and Hepatitis C, and then allowed Bayer to take the blame. This last story to me is the most important because it shows them as psychopaths, who present themselves as hard-scrabble political bumpkins from arkansas who worked their way up in the world.
3 911bodysnatchers322 2016-10-09
I want to be very clear. Anyone who supports the Clintons after knowing these things is an immoral person. I've already decided to never contact my uncle again, because he will not respond to me after I sent him the Arkansas Prison Blood scandal documentary and all the evidence of my research. He calls it 'propaganda' instead of History.
So he has revealed himself in my mind, to be a psychopath. Sheridan says, 'never contact again'. I'm down with that. He was a crap uncle anyway--stole my fries and such. If he can't trust his nephew who is trying hard to prevent another Hitler from rising to power (and yes I do mean that), then I can't help him. Contrariwise, he's compared Trump to hitler. I don't have any evidence to suggest Trump has done anything close to what the Clintons have done. He's conducted lawfare on people (used his money to tie people up in court, even if he's going to lose), which is shitty and unethical and bullying, but it's legal and he's probably had reasons to do it. What the clintons have done is both illegal and immoral.
3 cannibaloxfords 2016-10-09
The way you fight is like this:
Throwaway Twitter account and follow every single MSM account and 'journalist' account and counter each one of their posts with the facts, while asking why they aren't covering 'insert sourced story'
Do the same on MSM websites that allow comments at the bottom (this is wht NPR got rid of theirs because people were calling out their false illusion narrative bullshit)
Do the same thing on YouTube and reddit, and that's how you fight the ww3 information war we are currently in
-1 snakeaway 2016-10-09
Yea and Trumps main line of attack for women is how can you support her when her husband is a rapist just lost all credibility. Both are attacks are about things done over a decade ago.
8 Thizzlebot 2016-10-09
lol saying pussy and actually raping someone are very different. That's low on the totem pole but it forces him to address bullshit instead of focusing on the real issues.
4 HS_00 2016-10-09
After the latest Wikileaks disclosure, it is pretty obvious the NYT is little more than propaganda. What a surprise.
2 Hivac-TLB 2016-10-09
Emails seem to be a dead end too.
1 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-10-09
Hack the media email. You'll learn really fast how they scheme an agenda up.
0 Awkwardmoment22 2016-10-09
you've given up already?
6 HiFriend03 2016-10-09
Considering changing the play since the current one doesn't seem to be working.
3 fJ9yIQBU 2016-10-09
When was the last time selecting a president made a real difference for the little people?
0 kloppering_time 2016-10-09
Producers and editors within the mainstream media are responsible for keeping their advertisers happy.
The people who read the paper/watch the news/click the article for the most part aren't paying their operating costs.
Guess who their biggest advertisers are during election time. And guess who is spending the most money on adverts during this cycle.
-1 canihaveahint 2016-10-09
Martha Raddatz is sexy as f
-1 macadelic1901 2016-10-09
Total GILF
3 fJ9yIQBU 2016-10-09
When was the last time selecting a president made a real difference for the little people?