Why do people post long rants about why they are leaving a sub reddit and then post that long rant to the sub reddit? Is this supposed to be meaningful to anyone other than OP?
Is this an example of rage quitting on Reddit?
I doubt OPs post changes anyone's mind about /r/conspiracy, but it sure does make OP look frail/needy/emotionally immature.
Edit: This post is similar to a top post on the front page of /r/conspiracy about quitting /r/politics. Im suspicious of OP. Could OP be a CTR shill trying to make /r/conspiracy look bad and encourage other people to leave this sub since its one of the few places on Reddit where any real information about the criminal Clinton can be found?
I used to communicate meaningful information with people on this sub. I'd hoped some of those people might crawl out of the woodwork and convince me i'm wrong. Too bad all the Trump shills got here first. What a cancer.
Why would they crawl? Are they some sort of creature to you? Why does all the anti hillary stuff bother you so bad? Is it because you are a democrat?
Do you need total strangers to validate your feelings? Is that why you are rage quitting? Why cant you handle negative stories about the next president of the USA? I mean, I personally like the anti hillary stuff and anti trump stuff. Thats why I spend time in /r/politics. See, I hate both assholes. You apparently like one of them.
I wasn't exactly opposed to what you were saying until you started with the personal insults and accused him of being part of CTR. Doing this only seems to validate his claim, as he merely voiced his dissatisfaction with the recent content of this sub and your response was to resort to childish namecalling (frail/needy/emotionally immature) and then suggest he had a dark ulterior motive for posting.
If you disagree with him, fine, but personal attacks and unfounded accusations of being a shill working for CTR simply because he doesn't agree with your views is only proving his point that this is no longer a place where constructive discussions can be had without being attacked for your perspective.
You have a good argument. Im a pretty jaded, skeptical person so naturally I think the worst of people and suspect they have ulterior motives. There is just so much shit going on this election cycle, its hard for me to to be suspicious.
I can understand where you are coming from, there are indeed many shills, but the moment we start allowing suspicion to get the better of us and label anyone who's opinion differs from ours as suspicious is the moment this sub loses it's ability to have the type of open, honest conversations you won't find elsewhere. The type of conversations that make this place unique. If we become as close-minded of other peoples perspectives as r/politics then we are really no better than they are anymore..
It is a serious problem though, weeding out the shills from those who genuinely believe what they say. For that, I don't have an answer, though I wish I did..
Neither the numbers nor the political science support this. It's clear he won't win. I will commit to eating an actual handful of cowshit if he does.
Trump is only here to make people feel like Hillary's inevitable victory was somewhat hard fought. You tell a bunch of pissed off rednecks that they're fighting the good fight as long as they're fighting for the rich, and hey- presto! You've got them fighting their own interests, and supporting the mega-rich of this world.
Again, i'm frankly surprised this needs to be explained given how often US intelligence services have used this tactic overseas.
OP is directly copying the posts about people unsubscribing from r/politics. OP isn't even active on this sub save to comment about the debate. OP might be joking? I sure hope so.
What OP and other whiners don't understand is that this is an open conspiracy forum. Which candidate has the greatest level of conspiracy surrounding them? Hillary Clinton, by far. BY MASSIVE OCEANS FAR. We've got Bill and his sexcapades with convicted pedophiles, Hillary openly deleting emails and threatening war with Iran, falling down on camera due to a magical sickness...I can go on on, but the fact that these whiners can't see the forest through the trees is frustrating. Trump and Clinton are both corrupt asshats, but one is far more easier to attack and unearth juicy examples of international-level corruption. If OP wants to unearth juicy details on Trump's corruption, he/she should do so and stop playing the victim card.
The fact that Trump works for the Clintons is pretty well documented at this point. The fact that he is controlled opposition is part of the Clinton conspiracy. Any other narrative only serves to perpetuate the myth that voting actually matters.
"The fact that Trump works for the Clintons is pretty well documented at this point."
No, it isn't. Everyone has the right to an opinion here and many are not convinced. Where are your sources?
"also doesn't the term "whiner" come straight out of the Trump campaign playbook? funny to see people so convinced they're "thinking", when they're just parroting what the powerful say."
I don't have a playbook, but no, the word "whine" comes from Old English and it's not a new bandwagon insult such as 'cuck' that you seem to enjoy using elsewhere. Good job at "thinking for yourself".
"You Americans are so funny. You think gun-ownership=free-thinking. You need to actually do shit with them, you retards."
We do, do "shit" with them. We target shoot, protect our families and belongings, hunt, brag about them in front of UK kids to piss them off, etc. Seriously though, what are you wildly implying here? That we should stage an armed revolution? That's what stupid people that don't own guns think. Owning firearms is a responsibility that many of us take seriously. Brandishing one in public for nearly any reason is jail time and you lose that right FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE. Before you naively claim that all Americans are stupid, consider yourself stupid for inciting and promoting violence without justification when you obviously have never owned a gun. Shooting people on the street doesn't solve our problems in Washington, retard.
lol. i'm a veteran of several conflicts, dipshit. i've taken my life into my own hands more than once, to protect ideals that i hold dear. try that alpha posturing on someone else.
You just insulted an entire nation as retards because they own guns. I hope you didn't serve as an American, because no U.S. service man or woman that I've met is as disrespectful as you are.
also doesn't the term "whiner" come straight out of the Trump campaign playbook? funny to see people so convinced they're "thinking", when they're just parroting what the powerful say.
You Americans are so funny. You think gun-ownership=free-thinking. You need to actually do shit with them, you retards.
You should honestly just leave political discussions all together if you can't handle the fact that most forums are not neutral at this moment. Find the one that fits you because they are all running with a narrative right now. I dislike Clinton because I think she is nefarious in her intentions. I think Trump is just...a poor choice and very unqualified. So I really don't have much to say about him. But I have a lot of anger towards her. So you can have the subtle Trump support/overt Clinton hate here or the overt Clinton support/overt Trump hate on r/Politics right now. Take your pick or just leave.
do you know where you are? do you have the slightest idea what Hillary is all about? I'm going to guess no on both.
she will lead us to WW3, give the bankers/Wall Street bigger tax breaks and less regulation and will push through the TPP. she literally just had her transcripts released from the meetings she held with Wall Street, showing that she is for them and not for US.
Yeah, and she's going to get elected fro basically all these reasons. DO you think people who control all the things you mentioned would ever allow a fair election? Once you've invested a certain amount in subverting the system, the most rational thing to do is to ensure the democratic process is controlled. This was achieved decades ago. What's Trump going to do about it.
Armed insurrection, it's been a long time coming. If Americans had any critical thinking capacities there'd be Republicans, Democrats and bankers all hanging from ropes right now.
sooo.. you're saying just give in?? I think not. that is literally what they want. redpilling as many people as possible is the goal. that's exactly why we're constantly bogged down with disinformation and bullshit Hollywood reality TV shows, ignorance is bliss for the participant and the elite, alike.
the electoral process is owned and operated by international capitalist elites. people in SF knew this turn of the century when they rose up and took back their city. Indigenous people know this now. that's why they call them "warrior societies". look it up, real resistance is happening in your country.
33 comments
4 ZapPowerz 2016-10-10
Why do people post long rants about why they are leaving a sub reddit and then post that long rant to the sub reddit? Is this supposed to be meaningful to anyone other than OP?
Is this an example of rage quitting on Reddit?
I doubt OPs post changes anyone's mind about /r/conspiracy, but it sure does make OP look frail/needy/emotionally immature.
Edit: This post is similar to a top post on the front page of /r/conspiracy about quitting /r/politics. Im suspicious of OP. Could OP be a CTR shill trying to make /r/conspiracy look bad and encourage other people to leave this sub since its one of the few places on Reddit where any real information about the criminal Clinton can be found?
What do you say OP? Are you paid by CTR?
3 Putin_loves_cats 2016-10-10
^ this
1 orthocanna 2016-10-10
I used to communicate meaningful information with people on this sub. I'd hoped some of those people might crawl out of the woodwork and convince me i'm wrong. Too bad all the Trump shills got here first. What a cancer.
2 Dark_Nuts 2016-10-10
Vouch
0 ZapPowerz 2016-10-10
Why would they crawl? Are they some sort of creature to you? Why does all the anti hillary stuff bother you so bad? Is it because you are a democrat?
Do you need total strangers to validate your feelings? Is that why you are rage quitting? Why cant you handle negative stories about the next president of the USA? I mean, I personally like the anti hillary stuff and anti trump stuff. Thats why I spend time in /r/politics. See, I hate both assholes. You apparently like one of them.
1 orthocanna 2016-10-10
I don't like either. That's why i'm calling Trump controlled oposition. Or has your anti-SJW rage prevented you from being able to actually read?
1 ZapPowerz 2016-10-10
You might want to consider using your own thoughts and way of expressing yourself.
You make a post very similar to a front page post about quitting a subreddit and now youre using my language in your posts.
I feel kind of bad for you.
2 orthocanna 2016-10-10
Yes i also use english.
O prefieres que hablemos español? Despues de todo, tu país nos apartiene desde siglos. Solo los dejamos vivir en nuestras tierras.
2 ZapPowerz 2016-10-10
Perdieron su tierra por que su antepasados fueron inferiores. :)
1 DrauglinRog 2016-10-10
I wasn't exactly opposed to what you were saying until you started with the personal insults and accused him of being part of CTR. Doing this only seems to validate his claim, as he merely voiced his dissatisfaction with the recent content of this sub and your response was to resort to childish namecalling (frail/needy/emotionally immature) and then suggest he had a dark ulterior motive for posting.
If you disagree with him, fine, but personal attacks and unfounded accusations of being a shill working for CTR simply because he doesn't agree with your views is only proving his point that this is no longer a place where constructive discussions can be had without being attacked for your perspective.
1 ZapPowerz 2016-10-10
You have a good argument. Im a pretty jaded, skeptical person so naturally I think the worst of people and suspect they have ulterior motives. There is just so much shit going on this election cycle, its hard for me to to be suspicious.
2 DrauglinRog 2016-10-10
I can understand where you are coming from, there are indeed many shills, but the moment we start allowing suspicion to get the better of us and label anyone who's opinion differs from ours as suspicious is the moment this sub loses it's ability to have the type of open, honest conversations you won't find elsewhere. The type of conversations that make this place unique. If we become as close-minded of other peoples perspectives as r/politics then we are really no better than they are anymore..
It is a serious problem though, weeding out the shills from those who genuinely believe what they say. For that, I don't have an answer, though I wish I did..
1 ZapPowerz 2016-10-10
You are right and I was wrong. Thank you for pointing this out to me.
1 DrauglinRog 2016-10-10
No problem, I hope to see more posts from both you and ortho in the future.
2 factsnotfeelings 2016-10-10
This sub will get much better after the election, just wait until then.
-1 orthocanna 2016-10-10
Yeah, i'll check back in after they've stopped crying over his defeat and accusing Hillary of election fraud.
1 factsnotfeelings 2016-10-10
I actually think trump might win, the elite want people to feel that 'our vote matters' so in that sense it might be a good ploy to have trump win.
2 orthocanna 2016-10-10
Neither the numbers nor the political science support this. It's clear he won't win. I will commit to eating an actual handful of cowshit if he does.
Trump is only here to make people feel like Hillary's inevitable victory was somewhat hard fought. You tell a bunch of pissed off rednecks that they're fighting the good fight as long as they're fighting for the rich, and hey- presto! You've got them fighting their own interests, and supporting the mega-rich of this world.
Again, i'm frankly surprised this needs to be explained given how often US intelligence services have used this tactic overseas.
2 R0yGeeB1v 2016-10-10
OP is directly copying the posts about people unsubscribing from r/politics. OP isn't even active on this sub save to comment about the debate. OP might be joking? I sure hope so.
What OP and other whiners don't understand is that this is an open conspiracy forum. Which candidate has the greatest level of conspiracy surrounding them? Hillary Clinton, by far. BY MASSIVE OCEANS FAR. We've got Bill and his sexcapades with convicted pedophiles, Hillary openly deleting emails and threatening war with Iran, falling down on camera due to a magical sickness...I can go on on, but the fact that these whiners can't see the forest through the trees is frustrating. Trump and Clinton are both corrupt asshats, but one is far more easier to attack and unearth juicy examples of international-level corruption. If OP wants to unearth juicy details on Trump's corruption, he/she should do so and stop playing the victim card.
1 orthocanna 2016-10-10
The fact that Trump works for the Clintons is pretty well documented at this point. The fact that he is controlled opposition is part of the Clinton conspiracy. Any other narrative only serves to perpetuate the myth that voting actually matters.
1 R0yGeeB1v 2016-10-10
No, it isn't. Everyone has the right to an opinion here and many are not convinced. Where are your sources?
I don't have a playbook, but no, the word "whine" comes from Old English and it's not a new bandwagon insult such as 'cuck' that you seem to enjoy using elsewhere. Good job at "thinking for yourself".
We do, do "shit" with them. We target shoot, protect our families and belongings, hunt, brag about them in front of UK kids to piss them off, etc. Seriously though, what are you wildly implying here? That we should stage an armed revolution? That's what stupid people that don't own guns think. Owning firearms is a responsibility that many of us take seriously. Brandishing one in public for nearly any reason is jail time and you lose that right FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE. Before you naively claim that all Americans are stupid, consider yourself stupid for inciting and promoting violence without justification when you obviously have never owned a gun. Shooting people on the street doesn't solve our problems in Washington, retard.
0 orthocanna 2016-10-10
lol. i'm a veteran of several conflicts, dipshit. i've taken my life into my own hands more than once, to protect ideals that i hold dear. try that alpha posturing on someone else.
1 R0yGeeB1v 2016-10-10
You just insulted an entire nation as retards because they own guns. I hope you didn't serve as an American, because no U.S. service man or woman that I've met is as disrespectful as you are.
0 orthocanna 2016-10-10
also doesn't the term "whiner" come straight out of the Trump campaign playbook? funny to see people so convinced they're "thinking", when they're just parroting what the powerful say.
You Americans are so funny. You think gun-ownership=free-thinking. You need to actually do shit with them, you retards.
2 realmadrid314 2016-10-10
You should honestly just leave political discussions all together if you can't handle the fact that most forums are not neutral at this moment. Find the one that fits you because they are all running with a narrative right now. I dislike Clinton because I think she is nefarious in her intentions. I think Trump is just...a poor choice and very unqualified. So I really don't have much to say about him. But I have a lot of anger towards her. So you can have the subtle Trump support/overt Clinton hate here or the overt Clinton support/overt Trump hate on r/Politics right now. Take your pick or just leave.
1 downtowne 2016-10-10
Once Donald gets in and starts to screw up we'll have so much to talk about. Till then don't let the screen door hit you in the ass on the way out.
2 orthocanna 2016-10-10
He's not winning. He was never winning. He's running a fake campaign, for a fake competition that entitles the winner to fake power.
1 HitlaryforPrison 2016-10-10
GTFO-- good riddance
1 orthocanna 2016-10-10
Good luck worshiping a billionaire. I'm sure he gives a fuck about you and working class Americans. I'm sure his share-holders agree with you too.
2 HitlaryforPrison 2016-10-10
do you know where you are? do you have the slightest idea what Hillary is all about? I'm going to guess no on both.
she will lead us to WW3, give the bankers/Wall Street bigger tax breaks and less regulation and will push through the TPP. she literally just had her transcripts released from the meetings she held with Wall Street, showing that she is for them and not for US.
1 orthocanna 2016-10-10
Yeah, and she's going to get elected fro basically all these reasons. DO you think people who control all the things you mentioned would ever allow a fair election? Once you've invested a certain amount in subverting the system, the most rational thing to do is to ensure the democratic process is controlled. This was achieved decades ago. What's Trump going to do about it.
Armed insurrection, it's been a long time coming. If Americans had any critical thinking capacities there'd be Republicans, Democrats and bankers all hanging from ropes right now.
1 HitlaryforPrison 2016-10-10
sooo.. you're saying just give in?? I think not. that is literally what they want. redpilling as many people as possible is the goal. that's exactly why we're constantly bogged down with disinformation and bullshit Hollywood reality TV shows, ignorance is bliss for the participant and the elite, alike.
1 orthocanna 2016-10-10
i'm saying armed insurrection, guerrilla warfare, civil disobediance, extensive covert networks, terrorism.
the electoral process is owned and operated by international capitalist elites. people in SF knew this turn of the century when they rose up and took back their city. Indigenous people know this now. that's why they call them "warrior societies". look it up, real resistance is happening in your country.