Well everyone, the FDA finally gave a response to my FOIA request for when, why and how they made the decision that Cannabis was "of no medical value" which was used to inform the DEA to keep Cannabis on Schedule I of the drug code.

I received a CD in the mail today with the FOIA response files. It was not exactly what I asked for, but it is something. It gives us a starting point to then ask for documentation on the people and very specific studies used in that decision. This is everything they gave me:

• 8 Factor Krumm Petition.pdf
• 8 Factor Governors Petition.pdf
• Final Signed Ltr to DEA from OASH 6-3-15.compressed.pdf
• Final Signed Approved Memo to OASH from FDA 6-3-15.compressed.pdf

At first glance, I believe they cherry picked and made arbitrary decisions, esp. in terms of 'safety' and 'potential for abuse', because it's widely not considered physicially addictive (I'm an ex cigarette smoker, I know addiction, and I can tell you I picked up and put down pot 3 times in my life with no bad side effects...it's less addictive than coffee); and it's well less 'harmful' on a WHO chart of harm than ALL of the illegal drugs with the exception of LSD and mushrooms which are even less harmful (I personally think LSD is much more harmful than cannabis physically and psychologically). It's worthy to note on the safety level mushrooms are dead last. But I'm muddying the discussion.

These documents give you names of people who made these decisions, and gives some insight into why these decisions were made. I'm inviting you into a community effort to make sense of this and come up with additional documentation that we can continue to FOIA in order to get to the bottom of which 'evidence' was considered, which 'actual studies' and what documentation was evaluated to determine that cannabis satistfied the 8 Factor criteria.

---

A Synchronicity observation that probably belongs more in CST

I want to point out something unrelated that is kind of strange. "8 Factor" methodology is how they evaluated this, yet "Factor 8" is the name of the hemophiliac blood clotting factor and the name of the highly suppressed film based around the Clintons' Arkansas Prison Blood scandal--which, through our efforts here on /r/conspiracy, a redditor made this film available again on youtube--and with the Clintons we know about Mena Ak, the importation of competitive narcotics being narcotrafficed by the Fed itself into the US. You may think this is symbolomania, but I tend to see things differently, synchronicities like these seem notable.

More specifically, I feel like it's kind of this big occultic mockery trip, by the fed, to play around with names and numbers to make sure we know that we're being bullied here, that there's an active and extreme willingness to maintain themselves as an Advanced Persistive Threat to the mind, body and sensibility to the public. I know they are playing around with numbers because they did the same thing with my FOIA request, which was--if you have kept up with this whole thing from the beginning--was a duplicate request

Originally it was given foia request number 2016-7072 and then when we revised the request over several conversations they changed the name to 7270, and I was thinking this was done to throw me off. It was probably done just to claim a number in the future by moving things around, but therein is the trick saying institutionally, they are used to doing that, instead of just picking a the next new foia number as it's available (the 'take a number'...'take another number')

FDA FOIA 2016-7270 ===> 72 / 70 FDA FOIA 2016-7072 ===> 70 / 72

72 70 70 72

---

See for yourself. I'm not making any part of this up.

From: Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 5:19 PM To: Kotler, Sarah Subject: Re: FDA FOIA 2016-7072

From: Kotler, Sarah Sarah.Kotler@fda.hhs.gov to: cc: "Russ, Wilson" Wilson.Russ@fda.hhs.gov date: Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:03 AM subject: RE: FDA FOIA 2016-7270

---

Recap: My mind did this:

• Factor 8 <===> 8 Factor
• Factor 88 Factor
• 88
• HH
• Heil Hitler confirmed.

The FDA are nazis confirmed. Just kidding. That's ungrateful, they actually delivered, though it took them a while, it doesn't help much, and seems to say, "because we said so.". What do you think?