The Reddit admins have banned all users of /r/the_donald from mentioning /r/politics in their submissions or comments; in what seems to be a blatant attempt to veil the underhanded moderation tactics of reddit's most notoriously manipulated subreddit.
1272 2016-10-14 by AssuredlyAThrowAway
Following a week of steady criticism directed at reddit, after news leaked that the site had became embroiled in a congressional subpoena regarding Paul Combetta, staffers at Assuredly A News Agency have been informed via sources that a high-level meeting was called today between the reddit admins, and the head-moderators of /r/the_donald, in order to demand that users of the subreddit be prohibited from mentioning corruption on /r/politics.
It is understood that the administrators of Reddit.com have told the largest Republican subreddit on their platform, in no uncertain terms, that even mentioning the name of "/r/politics" in a submission title or comment is a violation of the site wide terms of service; specifically as they apply to "brigading other communities".
Many users of /r/the_donald, and else where around reddit, were outraged at this action on behalf of the reddit administrators; as this policy prohibiting mention of //rpolitics directly undermines the ability of the reddit community at large to engage in effective oversight of corrupt moderation.
In a heart-stopping example, just today a thread pointing out the "blackout" occurring in /r/politics with regards to the recent Podetta Email leaks was ordered to be removed at the behest of reddit admins.
This newest revelation is perhaps no surprise, as, for many weeks now, subreddits like /r/undelete and /r/the_donald have spent countless hours crowd-sourcing oversight of the moderation on /r/politics, and what was uncovered sends chills down the spine of those who seek a news aggregate with integrity; a nearly endless pattern of pro-Hillary stories were being flooded to /r/politics, while any anti-Hillary or Pro-Donald Trump posts were being removed with prejudice.
In an even more dramatic turn of events, submissions which aimed to paint Donald Trump in a negative light were also being removed the second that their respective comment sections turned against the conclusions of the article.
Many users on the popular networking site are in open revolt as a result of today's demand on the part of the reddit admins, and this may perhaps be a result of damning new information just coming to light which seems to show that all donations from reddit employees during this year's campaign cycle have gone to Democrats.
In an ill-fated attempt to quell user outrage, reddit admin "redtaboo" was quoted this week as saying, with regards to accusations of corruption on the part of the moderators in /r/politics;
In the case of /r/politics there has never been any proof of wrongdoing.
However, some are wondering just how impartial the reddit admins may be during this contentious election; as it seems to be very clear that /r/politics is being shielded from any potential criticism by the owners of reddit itself.
This type of behavior on the part of the reddit admins demonstrates, quite openly, that they are unable to effectively provide oversight in order to thwart third-party conflicts of interest on their platform; a conclusion which suggests congress's interest in the platform may only just have begun.
137 comments
127 Putin_loves_cats 2016-10-14
Calling for a sticky, mods..
edit: /u/flytape, /u/Ambiguously_Ironic, /u/mr_dong, /u/SovereignMan, /u/jamescolespardon, /u/sabremesh. This deserves it. I'm conjuring you all... I don't do that lightly...
25 shiv68 2016-10-14
I second this please.
16 petedacook 2016-10-14
I third this.
11 dudeofedud 2016-10-14
I fourth this.
11 uz117 2016-10-14
I fifth this
11 polar-alpines 2016-10-14
I'm not sure whether I sixth or thirteenth this...
11 beaverb0y 2016-10-14
I never post in here. But the manipulation going on in the politics subreddit is unbelivable
9 dr_rosenberg 2016-10-14
This. I called this in a different sub when ICANN was taking over a while back. The future is very bleak if the grassroots movement of suppression of free speech will be ridiculously stronger in the future. I fear to imagine what the average person will be highly restricted to talk about much less post online.
7 cmp1 2016-10-14
Is it brigading when pol calls out the donald sub in a post?
5 maxluck89 2016-10-14
I think I'll throw a fourth in there again myself
5 Meaterator 2016-10-14
Ditto.
3 MOS6502 2016-10-14
I this this.
3 edhredhr 2016-10-14
this
2 theSpringZone 2016-10-14
I twelfth this
2 martini-meow 2016-10-14
When asking on the bug sub about /u/ call outs not working i was informed that tagging more than 3 users in a post/comment means none get an alert. Canned pork-meat product or something. ymmv
106 shiv68 2016-10-14
It is way past time to bury r/politics and just avoid the place. I know that I have been guilty of going there to collect downvotes but no more. Let the shills shill to themselves.
I am not even a Trump supporter but I sure despise Hillary.
Someone is shadowbanned.
28 SunnyvaleHockeyClub 2016-10-14
I still check it out everyday. It used to be the first 3 or 4 top posts were informative. Now it reads like a script.
34 shiv68 2016-10-14
CTR is running a spampaign and winning with the help of reddit.
13 Why-so-delirious 2016-10-14
They're only 'winning' in that one shithole.
They're paid shills, they don't venture outside their new trump-hate-hug-box, /r/politics.
Watch what happens when one of them ventures outside. They get downvoted and ignored so goddamn fast because their views are so outside the realm of common fucking sense that nobody can stand them.
I saw like eight posts at the top of /r/politics yesterday WHINING that Trump was going to jail the lawyers who protected Clinton, and how he was a fascist dictator ALREADY for even mentioning doing such an awful thing.
Nobody with more than a handful of brain cells left could possibly believe that he was threatening the entire law firm with jail if he gets elected. But that's the ONLY thing that /r/politics would say.
But try and say that he was trying to jail the entire firm outside of that fucking shithole hugbox, and see how long your comment is visible for.
The rest of reddit is relatively shill-free, so far, so that kind of wanton fucking stupidity is not accepted.
6 cylth 2016-10-14
That first parts wrong. They go into other subs all the time. They're in all the state subs (like local politics subs) and show up any time something about the presidential race comes up.
Theyre also in almost all the default subs.
4 SyntheticMemory 2016-10-14
They're also in other leftist subreddits in force, such as /r/socialism, /r/lostgeneration, etc.
I'm not a Trump supporter and think he's a piece of shit. Think Shillary is a piece of shit too.
I'm just about to stop coming to reddit for good.
2 cylth 2016-10-14
Same situation. Im a socialist and I get called a Trump supporter all the time.
2 SyntheticMemory 2016-10-14
Yeah, I'm kind of tired being told I have to prevent fascism by voting for Clinton.
The bitch is a fascist. The podesta emails and then the likelihood that Clinton has had Assange silenced (or assassinated) is all the evidence you need.
10 SunnyvaleHockeyClub 2016-10-14
It's incredible. Some of that stuff reads like campaign statements with really forced Reddit humor. I read one the other day and was going to post it here, but there's nothing we can do but stay woke, homie.
13 shiv68 2016-10-14
I have been on the internet since 96 and have never seen anything like this. What a disgrace.
2 thatguy4243 2016-10-14
When George Orwell wrote 1984, he was clearly talking about Hillary Clinton.
1 GoyBoyAdvanced 2016-10-14
Holy shit nice meme. https://youtu.be/HhwdPdtQs94
14 DominarRygelThe16th 2016-10-14
Look at www.notreddit.top
These are the posts that CTR stops from seeing the light of day.
5 BlakeRidley 2016-10-14
Haha two of my posts are there!
3 BarryOSeven 2016-10-14
Holy shit it's all pro-Trump what's being downvoted down the drain.
Never knew this site is this corrupt. Gross.
2 YourMomsaHoax 2016-10-14
Woooooow. Most are from /r/politics.
It's pretty obvious that sub is bought and paid for. I just posted there for the first time just to tell the mods to suck my dick.
11 Nogrim5 2016-10-14
its way past time to just bury reddit. this isn't just a problem limited to a few subreddits.
7 shiv68 2016-10-14
Reddit could be another digg or fark.
11 Nogrim5 2016-10-14
reddit was another digg about 2 or 3 years ago, reddit is bigger and a real replacement hasn't popped up. Voat.co isn't too bad but it doesn't have enough content to be self sustaining yet.
6 shiv68 2016-10-14
It will sooner or later.
1 the_friendly_dildo 2016-10-14
Honestly, a website with token voting like /. would be a lot better. Over there, they only allow a handful of people to vote on comments at a given time. So long as you are contributing to dicussions somewhat regularly, you'll get a number of voting tokens where you can vote comments up or down.
An example could be:
Also, another nice aspect is that if you have vote tokens, you can't both vote on a comment and respond in text. Due to this, they are called "mod points" where everyone is occasionally a moderator.
6 chi-hi 2016-10-14
Since I unsubscribed from that sub I started to realize that it's not common to have everything you say down voted into oblivion. Reddit will eventually go the way of digg
4 King0fThoseWhoKnow 2016-10-14
I only started goimg there after it became a shill party lol, love the drama. And love watching every post that's not pro hillary (even neutral posts) to 13% within a few seconds
3 [deleted] 2016-10-14
yeah the thing is /r/politics has always been bad. it's like a bunch of kids playing Magic the Gathering, and discussing their MtG card fights and collections, as if it's a real thing, not a game, and as if their favorite card matters and is somehow 'in a fight with other cards'. It improved during the primaries when people were posting about real issues, then it was completely taken over by HRC PR people, who are all on new accounts.
it's always been a bunch of people living in make-believe land and posting about shit that doesn't matter at all. now it's just suddenly a PR outlet for the DNC.
2 MangoTru7h 2016-10-14
I'm fine with r/politics. It just needs to be renamed to r/the_hillary
-1 nncook30 2016-10-14
Haven't been there since last election except when following a link from here.
58 aeontorpor 2016-10-14
The rampant corruption all around is sickening. Can we really hope for no better?
5 DissentingOpinions 2016-10-14
There is always hope.
6 cylth 2016-10-14
Sometimes you just have to manufacture your own since they'll election fraud out the one guy who actually seemed genuine and not corrupt.
5 DissentingOpinions 2016-10-14
Or, accept that the world is not perfect and do what you can to help those around you.
1 fenrisx 2016-10-14
No there isn't. Doom. Gloom. Gopher vs toad amidst whiney bitches.
2 Lucifirius 2016-10-14
Voat!
35 doppelgaber 2016-10-14
You're naive if you think the admins aren't in on these shenanigans.
15 BeastPenguin 2016-10-14
There was a post in /r/the_donald directly from the mods telling the community that reddit admins told TDmods to filter/automoderate all posts and comments that referred to the politics subreddit. Really sickening
8 Do_u_ev3n_lift 2016-10-14
They forced r/the_donald to setup an automod preventing direct links to r/politics accusing us of brigading.. Which is nonsense. ETS, SRS and Politics are actually organizing brigading against the_donald and others like it via their CTR paid shills. Its really fucking sickening. Politics was always skewed to the left, but a conservative could at least make a point now and then and be heard. Articles i'd post would get 30-40 Karma and get burried. They don't even try to hide their bias now. They find an excuse to delete dissenting opinion immediately. Comments that go against the narrative are instantly -15, -20 and buried. They organize the CTR to squash any unapproved line of thinking. Its zero fun for a conservative/libertarian to be there, but i bet its even lost its appeal to thinking liberals who want to get the news. When 100% of the posts are anti-trump or pro-hillary, there's no other topics covered anymore.
35 [deleted] 2016-10-14
[removed]
10 libertyordeath1 2016-10-14
pulls shirt off
Whaddya wann do huh? Whaddya wanna do?
2 JuicyJuice23 2016-10-14
You are in the right place. Welcome to the "New" America.
3 fenrisx 2016-10-14
wanna fight about it?
1 TheGhostOfDusty 2016-10-14
Rule 6.
14 dudeofch4os 2016-10-14
Seriously, how shocked are we? I'm not one bit surprised by this. I'm not subbed to /r/politics, but damn do I hear about it every-fucking-where I go on reddit.
3 lordx3n0saeon 2016-10-14
I wonder if this will wakeup people in /r/conspiracy.
Look who the ENTIRE MACHINE is trying to silence. Look who they're attacking at absolutely every level of society.
The elite is scared.
13 neutron_ 2016-10-14
/r/watchredditdie
1 YoureAllRobots 2016-10-14
Thanks, 'scribed!
1 debaser11 2016-10-14
On Reddit lol. If they can't stay away I don't know why they think the majority of users (who I doubt care about politics on Reddit) will.
7 -3E- 2016-10-14
To me this sounds like the Admins have been compromised!
4 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2016-10-14
Don't be silly-https://search.wikileaks.org/gifiles/?q=antique+jetpack&mfrom=&mto=&title=&notitle=&date=&nofrom=&noto=&count=50&sort=0&file=&docid=&relid=0#searchresult
That would never happen-https://np.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1ywspe/new_snowden_doc_reveals_how_gchqnsa_use_the/cfokkqc
;)
3 -3E- 2016-10-14
Wow...so you think this all still ties to the "Antique Jetpack". This has been in play for a long time.
1 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2016-10-14
I do indeed.
2 -3E- 2016-10-14
Need a PodCast. Talk with GizaDog. :p
1 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2016-10-14
Oh goodness, I did an interview here a while back- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UI2iEgWouYo
1 -3E- 2016-10-14
Have you seen this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TS7lk1rURXI
6 petrus4 2016-10-14
Guys...
http://cuddlebuggery.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Picard-Facepalm.jpg
I've been using this site for six years now. At this point, the idea that Reddit is literally a wretched hive of Marxist scum and villainy, is something I take completely for granted. If I want to visit the other side of the aisle, that is what /pol/ is for, but if I want actually intelligent conversation in either case, then I'm plain out of luck.
Reddit is run by Leftists, for Leftists. This site is something which Joseph McCarthy would have been very glad that he didn't live to see. That has several implications; all of them negative.
a} Leftists don't debate. Ever. If you make a statement that they disagree with, they call it a hate crime, scream that you've hurt their feelings, and do everything in their power to both ensure that said statement never sees the light of day, and also destroy you both socially and personally. Leftists are not capable of rhetoric, and they therefore detest the concept of freedom of expression, because they know that they do not have the ability to win a legitimate argument. That is the entire purpose of the voting system on this site; to ensure that Leftists are never required to logically support their opinions.
b} Yes, this site is going to be a completely uncritical bastion of support for Hillary. I don't like that myself, or excuse it, but you're just going to have to suck it up and deal. Remember, Leftists don't do logic. They do not rationally assess the merit of ideas; they emotionally assess whether or not a person is worthy of inclusion within the Hive, on the basis of whether or not said person expresses gateway-approved opinions, and perceived loyalty, which is primarily defined by said agreement. If Hillary does that in public, then it doesn't matter how much of a corrupt, raving psychopath the rest of us might know her to be. As long as Hillary expresses certainty in evolutionary theory, and support for Black Lives Matter, then they will unquestioningly support her to the hilt.
c} Leftists believe that the ends justify the means. If Hillary is their candidate, then literally anything that gets her the Presidency is considered justifiable. Vote rigging, the stunt that was pulled with the Star Trek production community, bribery, corruption of the media, you name it. It's all on the table. Leftists do not believe in consistent ethics, because rules are tools of the oppressors, and the oppressors are merely to be destroyed. Privelege is only called such, when it applies to a group that Leftists disapprove of. If their in-group does the same thing, then they will claim that their past oppression justifies it.
I don't condone any of this, and I don't want you to make the mistake of thinking that I do. In six years, however, I have been through every negative emotion regarding this site that you can think of. I've experienced disgust, contempt, rage, despair, depression, misanthropy; you name it. At this point I'm starting to become numb. The main reason why I'm becoming desensitised to it, is because if there is one thing I've realised, it is that Leftists will insist on their shit. They crave it. You can point out logical inconsistencies and complete ethical abandonment to them as much as you like; they don't care. They demand their degeneracy, and they are going to have it no matter what. They do not recognise that they have a problem, and they do not want help to overcome it.
All they want is for you to either agree with them, or shut up.
16 [deleted] 2016-10-14
yeah that's alright except that it's not "leftists" that it all applies to and you're stupid if you think any of that is specific to "leftists", that's how most people are, and "leftists vs. rightists" is a completely irrelevant way to describe people and a completely fake way to think about politics. it means nothing and has no bearing on reality. The people on "the right" are more guilty than anyone else of all of that, but seeing as both left and right are the same, it doesn't really matter.
there are people who are falling for and participating in obvious scams for personal profit, and people who aren't. both Clinton II vs. her own donor and long-time family friend, WWE Raw actor Donald Trump are scams. Just like it was a scam when Bush II "ran against" his own frat brother and fellow Bonesman, Al Gore. It's a scam. When an impeached president's wife is set up to run against her husband's billionaire donor and golfing buddy, there's a big problem, and it has nothing to do with "left or right", it has to do with the masses being stupid and complacent and falling for obvious scams while thinking they're being intelligent by debating "left vs. right".
It's like in Russia if Putin's wife was set up to "run against" Putin's billionaire campaign donor and golf buddy. That's not "left vs. right", it's a scam of rich vs. poor with a mafia of oligarchs legitimizing their rule by installing "candidates" via "democratic elections" who will play ball. That's it. There is no left or right. There are people who are fooled by scams and people who aren't.
Talking about "leftists" or left vs. right is completely meaningless in the world you live in today. It's a scam to keep you divided from everyone else and keep you distracted from obvious political realities that have nothing to do with "left vs. right".
-1 [deleted] 2016-10-14
[deleted]
9 [deleted] 2016-10-14
facepalm, good luck with your pretend divisions and fake competitions that serve to do nothing but divide and conquer you and all the other people who aren't in the control mafia, and PS, clinton II vs. her donor and family friend trump is a perfect example of how absolutely fake "left vs. right" is, just like Bush II vs. his own frat brother Gore. It's a fake competition, like football, to distract you from the actual political realities facing your country and people, who you don't want to be united with, because [fake reason here].
left vs. right is a completely fake argument that you've fallen for and now focus your attention on, because you want to feel like you're somehow in the 'better team', but really you're all on the same team, the team being fucked over by the mafia that has seized power (who, by the way, are most certainly NOT "leftists", and only idiots would think they are). left vs. right is a fake conflict used to make poor people fight among themselves.
-1 Phaynel 2016-10-14
Point A here is one of the truest things I've ever read. As someone who has been on the receiving end of this time and again, it is EXHAUSTING to deal with.
2 petrus4 2016-10-14
You also got downvoted to -1 for expressing this opinion, as well; yet they still insist to me that I'm wrong.
5 casemodsalt 2016-10-14
The entire website pushes an agenda.
I feel bad for people who still read default subs.
Reddit is basically just an extension of news media. Completely useless
0 The_Big_Lebaneski 2016-10-14
Politics is not a default
2 Iorith 2016-10-14
It was for a long time, and when it was removed from default, lots of people were still subscribed because of it.
-3 tjhovr 2016-10-14
upliftingnews pushing propaganda.
oldschoolcool pushing pro-war "look how great my father/grandfather was in vietnam/ww2/etc" propaganda.
It's unbelievable how much reddit has changed.
It's cause the dumb SJWs of the media elite now control reddit. It is an agenda driven worthless website now that pretty much serves propaganda and ads.
4 petedacook 2016-10-14
Interesting. A well written and documented post with 14 comments, yet not a single upvote. How the postit is a victim of the same thing it attemptsto expose.
3 Silvystreak 2016-10-14
SubredditDrama is trying to say us and T_D are idiots for believing anything is wrong with r politics
2 OaklandCali 2016-10-14
Fuck all mods.
2 smashing3000 2016-10-14
Kinda feels like the Donald has infected this sub.
4 The_Big_Lebaneski 2016-10-14
This, uncensorednews, undelete, basically anywhere they can clutch on to anti Hillary or anti r-politics sentiment
3 Horus_Krishna_4 2016-10-14
facts infected it
0 lordx3n0saeon 2016-10-14
If you can't see that the entire political machine and elite establishment is levied against one side and one side only you're blind.
This is the largest confirmed actively ongoing conspiracy. It absolutely has a place here.
"We'll plant the story with some friendlies at the AP"
-Absolutely disgusting
0 DeathDevilize 2016-10-14
Im aware of that, i still refuse to support a buisnessmen, if those were who brought us into this situation in the first place, one with questionable morals no less.
America is doomed if people seriously consider obeying either of them.
1 lordx3n0saeon 2016-10-14
So you're retarded.
1 Iorith 2016-10-14
You can not support him while still calling out this bullshit.
2 faddat 2016-10-14
Well,
This is why I keep asking y'all conspirators to jump onboard the steemship at steemit.com.
We're free, because the blockchain cannot lie.
2 tritonx 2016-10-14
This is a war.
2 Slaterock990 2016-10-14
No matter who you support this should be stopped now! This is the path to fascism!! and it should scare you...
2 Wollff 2016-10-14
Protect the bastion of unmoderated, uncensored, and unmanipulated free speech that is /r/The_Donald!
2 AutomaticEverything 2016-10-14
The Donald is not a Republican subreddit. It is a joke subreddit. Anyone who takes it seriously is an idiot.
Posts there can go "certified dank" it is a joke.
2 highTrolla 2016-10-14
What are you, retarded? Brigading has always been against the rules. Linking to another sub and telling people to mass down vote is brigading. Don't act like you're being victimized just because you forgot that rules exist.
1 cooperino16 2016-10-14
Are referring to a specific example of brigading? Or are you referring to OP?
1 highTrolla 2016-10-14
I'm referring to OP acting like his political views are being marginalized, when in reality, r/The_Donald is notorious for brigading.
2 cooperino16 2016-10-14
I'm not saying they never brigaded, not a trump fan myself, but this new rule is incredibly ambiguous. By simply mentioning a particular sub, you are considered to be "brigading?"
If you enforce that rule to both subs with the same exact interpretation it would get so much hate for being an abusive rule from both sides. That's the beauty of enforcing rules equally in not only the judicial system, but sports, school, events in general.
Non biased rules mean they apply to everyone equally. This rule is basically saying "all of this particular group of people are guilty of xyz." "All cops are murderers", etc. When in reality we know not all cops are bad. There needs to be the same interpretation of that rule enforced across the entire site. Once everyone realizes how easily it can be abused, then it will have to be narrowed to something a little more specific like: actually calling for a brigade straight up. Simply mentioning the sub in passing should not be cause for a ban.
1 highTrolla 2016-10-14
Honestly that's a pretty fair point. Thank you for your view.
1 cucklordsupreme 2016-10-14
I was reading this thread and hopped over to /r/politics when this happened..
https://m.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/57f5dl/rredacteds_mods_replaced_their_frontpage_with_a/
1 koopa_t 2016-10-14
boo! Censorship!!! defcon 3 people, we gotta mobilize before the elite wipe us out!! we're already late! now is the time!!!!
1 ribble 2016-10-14
R-POLITICS is the biggest brigade around! the Corrupt the Record brigade!
1 Dragofireheart 2016-10-14
This sort of post could easily be on The_Donald (well, used to), here, or KotakuInAction.
1 megaspif 2016-10-14
They are trying way too hard - should be obvious to anyone now that there is something goofy going on with that sub. the way they are protected by admin makes it even goofier
1 BlueDrank01 2016-10-14
Only a complete idiot looking for validation of their ideas would visit /r/politics at this point. There's not a single free thinking admin at Reddit as a whole, so none of this surprises me at all. The best course of action is to simply unsubscribe. Eventually the users that aren't completely brainwashed will notice the trend of tyranny on the subreddit and leave as well.
Any discussion that gets too real on Reddit these days is removed, those in power know we're already way too informed as it is. The truth is that Reddit stopped being a place to freely share ideas long ago. It's too popular with target demographics now to let non-globalist ideas propagate.
1 troop357 2016-10-14
Oh the comment s in this thread reminded me why I unsubscribed this sub in the first place.
Don't get me wrong OP, your post is informative, but the sheer amount of circlejerk and ignorance on the comments... Feels almost as bad as in r/politics
1 TheGlew 2016-10-14
"In the case of /r/politics there has never been any proof of wrongdoing."
Is he actually trying to sound like a guilty weasel?
1 [deleted] 2016-10-14
[removed]
1 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2016-10-14
Sorry, this will be considered a call for brigading by the admins and I have to remove your comment. My apologies.
1 MangoTru7h 2016-10-14
:(
1 Light_of_Lucifer 2016-10-14
/r/politics has been in total propaganda mode since Bernie was cheated in the DNC race and dropped out. Its so blatant its insane. They havnt discussed A SINGLE wikileaks emails despite the fact that before Bernie dropped out the sub wanted them badly. Look at the top 20 posts, every single one is anti trump its disgusting
1 ZapPowerz 2016-10-14
Their next targets: /r/conspiracy, /r/dncleaks
Like I posted yesterday guys, its over. Its been nice, but this place is fucking done being a place to share information.
1 m3mb3r5h1p_r3v0k3d 2016-10-14
Has anyone interviewed the CEO of reddit Steve Huffman about this? I would be interested to see what he has to say. Or maybe some hacked emails of his would do.
1 AmbitiousSimon 2016-10-14
r/politics
1 waffle247 2016-10-14
Oh come off it, The_Donald ban any user who submits links that don't support Trump. What a bunch of hypocrites you are!
0 Namesoog 2016-10-14
Why go there and support it. Let them have a big Clinton love fest. It's a free country for them to do as they please. Just go about doing your thing elsewhere.
-1 JuicyJuice23 2016-10-14
It sure costs hella money to be "free"
0 Endiamon 2016-10-14
Are you talking about politics or the_donald?
6 The_Big_Lebaneski 2016-10-14
Both
4 lordx3n0saeon 2016-10-14
Hilarious.
Note you're not comparing /r/hillaryclinton
Both TD and HC are pro-their-candidate. Politics is supposed to be neutral.
1 Endiamon 2016-10-14
Why would I bring up that subreddit when it wasn't part of the original quote? It looks like there really is nothing in the entire world that Trump supporters like to do more than wave away problems with the Trump campaign by asking "what about Hillary Clinton?"
Beyond that, we're not talking about bias. We're talking about manipulation and I don't recall r/HillaryClinton having anywhere near the same level of mod drama as r/The_Donald. If there was anything even remotely approaching the level of the ciswhitemaelstrom shitstorm over there, please let me know.
2 lordx3n0saeon 2016-10-14
Because this is how the conversation goes:
-/r/politics censors!
-Well /r/the_donald does too!!!
-No shit, one is a sub FOR a candidate, one is supposed to be neutral not /r/secretlyForHillary
This happens again, and AGAIN, and again again again.
It's god damn sickening how you can't talk about /r/poltics issues without some mong trying to compare /r/the_donald
It's obvious why the two aren't comparable, that is... unless you're paid to think otherwise.
0 Endiamon 2016-10-14
Who said anything about censorship? Manipulation can involve other things, like literally selling and buying subreddits.
It's also pretty telling how you can't go two posts without throwing out shill accusations.
1 lordx3n0saeon 2016-10-14
You're an idiot.
There, saved us all some time.
0 Endiamon 2016-10-14
Well I was trying to be polite, but yes, you are.
-6 blakdart 2016-10-14
Not to attack /r/the_donald but I say the Admins need to ban it to unleash digital hell on this website. Just imagine that shit storm from not only Trump supporters, but by other reddit users,and by people not from the website.
Heaven forbid 229,000 trump supporter going to 8ch,the server wouldn't be able to support that amount of traffic.
2 xahhfink6 2016-10-14
Actually thinking about it that kind of proves that the admins are anything but biased... Given their previous criteria for banning certain subreddits like fatpeoplehate, The_Donald has already given them enough to ban it if they wanted to. The fact that they haven't kinda proves that the admins are willing to accept their political views even if there is a lot of other things going on in that crapshoot of a sub.
0 Trumpirium 2016-10-14
They're willing to accept the ad revenue that all of their traffic brings
1 Horus_Krishna_4 2016-10-14
I'm banned from the Donald, they're just as corrupt as politics sub, no surprise. true conservatives as mods would have resigned rather than follow reddit's orders on this.
2 waffle247 2016-10-14
Same. I got banned because I posted a link to the guardian article about the sexual assault allegations. I thought they were quite pertinent to the sub but apparently only good publicity is allowed over there.
2 Horus_Krishna_4 2016-10-14
instead of censorship they should discuss it, what if guardian's site lies, let's discuss that. censorship makes it look like it must be true.
1 waffle247 2016-10-14
That's my view. Plus it's clear they didn't read anything beyond the headlines because the article actually supports Trumps case & does point out that it's telling the accusations cropped up at this particular time. It's not "pro Trump" but it is objective (for a guardian left wing article at least). The reaction made me think he was more likely guilty than not.
2 Horus_Krishna_4 2016-10-14
guilty or not censoring won't get us to the bottom of it
it's like when John Edwards was cheating on his wife, only National Enquirer reported on it making most assume they lied. Wrong assumption.
1 waffle247 2016-10-14
Yeah but the guardian are not exactly national enquirer level. They at least try to have sources that are more accurate than Trumps campaign promises... "Build a wall & make mexico pay for it" - erm mexico just said "no" just FYI Mr Trump.
2 Horus_Krishna_4 2016-10-14
true so even worse. not that I trust either 100%. But censoring stuff makes me wonder why. If it's false ok but explain to me why and how don't just immediately censor.
1 waffle247 2016-10-14
Yeah a lack of coherent response doesn't help Trumps case.
2 Horus_Krishna_4 2016-10-14
that "the Donald" sub is run by CTR shill mods. Who knows as to why. Donald himself has no connection to it.
1 waffle247 2016-10-14
I think it's just bots from what I've seen of it. I've never figured any of the reddit subs to be affiliated with their politicians of choice, it's very very far from the right forum for the subject. Reddit should stick to the circlejirk, it's what we're best at.
1 Horus_Krishna_4 2016-10-14
from subreddit cancer I saw where some of the Donald mods got caught trying to use to with that Milo guy to spam it with some money making scheme. I think they're at least a few actual human non bots they're just greedy aholes not people that care about Donald or his politics.
7 shiv68 2016-10-14
Reddit could be another digg or fark.
1 the_friendly_dildo 2016-10-14
Honestly, a website with token voting like /. would be a lot better. Over there, they only allow a handful of people to vote on comments at a given time. So long as you are contributing to dicussions somewhat regularly, you'll get a number of voting tokens where you can vote comments up or down.
An example could be:
Also, another nice aspect is that if you have vote tokens, you can't both vote on a comment and respond in text. Due to this, they are called "mod points" where everyone is occasionally a moderator.
1 highTrolla 2016-10-14
I'm referring to OP acting like his political views are being marginalized, when in reality, r/The_Donald is notorious for brigading.
1 waffle247 2016-10-14
I think it's just bots from what I've seen of it. I've never figured any of the reddit subs to be affiliated with their politicians of choice, it's very very far from the right forum for the subject. Reddit should stick to the circlejirk, it's what we're best at.