Agreed, also it's not easy to kill a guy in an embassy in a sovereign nation. It would be a huge international incident and would make a martyr of him, and a dead man switch probably does exist.
I wasn't implying it couldn't have been done. I'm just saying if you're doing a risk/reward assessment of assassinating a journalist in an embassy in a foreign country to avoid embarrassment? She's running against Trump with 3/4 of the MSM at her back.
He has a life insurance!! A locked file was released some time ago that is said that passcode to open the file will be released to the public if something happens to him. I think the file is still downloadable somewhere in the Wikileaks page. I wouldn't download it tough if i was you. God knows what documents are in there, if he's putting his life on it i would assume it has some documents that you don't want anywhere near you. Its probably the kind of documents that make your whole bloodline commit suicide.
I suspect there is a dead man's switch should he expire. That's the only explanation besides him being complicit. He's probably got something on 9/11 is my guess.
That's the only thing that keeps me from wholeheartedly embracing the theory. Maybe if he secretly negotiated a formalised immunity agreement with Clinton/the DOJ? Perhaps after all these years he's had enough and is happy to step back out of public life. He did mention in that 10th anniversary press conference that if pressure on Ecuador became too great he would have to resign as editor. That could be the pretext.
If they tried to charge him for offenses in relation to acts for which he'd been given immunity then all they'd have to do is produce the agreement to the public and to the court. All bets would be off if he started leaking new stuff they didn't like.
The suspicion is simple, that he's agreed not to release certain information in exchange for not being prosecuted. Maybe he's releasing stuff that's embarrassing but not really devastating.
it will be devastating they want it so that the dnc will not have time to switch up i think the clintoons are so stupid they are actually getting played from all directions.....
it is definitely suspect. question is: does he have potentially damaging info & was threatened OR something else? i tend to think he was threatened. (because that's what i want to believe)
He's stuck in the Ecuadorian embassy for many year now and faces immediate arrest and extradition to America where he will be tortured if he steps out.
That's the only thing that keeps me from wholeheartedly embracing the theory. Maybe if he secretly negotiated a formalised immunity agreement with Clinton/the DOJ? Perhaps after all these years he's had enough and is happy to step back out of public life. He did mention in that 10th anniversary press conference that if pressure on Ecuador became too great he would have to resign as editor. That could be the pretext.
it will be devastating they want it so that the dnc will not have time to switch up i think the clintoons are so stupid they are actually getting played from all directions.....
34 comments
5 towerseven 2016-10-14
To be fair Julian Assange has gotten so much media attention that it worse to kill him.
Plus, he's smart and probably has a backup plan in case he is killed (more devastating leaks)
7 NarwhalStreet 2016-10-14
Agreed, also it's not easy to kill a guy in an embassy in a sovereign nation. It would be a huge international incident and would make a martyr of him, and a dead man switch probably does exist.
1 [deleted] 2016-10-14
[deleted]
2 NarwhalStreet 2016-10-14
I wasn't implying it couldn't have been done. I'm just saying if you're doing a risk/reward assessment of assassinating a journalist in an embassy in a foreign country to avoid embarrassment? She's running against Trump with 3/4 of the MSM at her back.
2 SigmundFloyd76 2016-10-14
Nah. They could Oklahoma city his ass.
Pull a cube van up front, drone the building and claim some nut-job patriot did it.
They could fuck with the water, the ventilation, etc.
At this point, HRC could be caught on video strangling him with her bare hands and it wouldn't matter.
1 simplepanda 2016-10-14
In public, in a parade, in a convertible. That's a lot different than having to break into an embassy and get past armed guards to kill someone.
1 Aluminoti 2016-10-14
It has been attempted I'm sure it is just one of many https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/news/uk/702542/Panic-intruder-Ecuadorian-Embassy-Julian-Assange/amp?client=ms-android-motorola
3 chickyrogue 2016-10-14
they do not want to trigger his kill switch reveal
5 [deleted] 2016-10-14
[deleted]
1 ninja_toitel 2016-10-14
Exactly. This is the reason I believe WikiLeaks is a limited hangout/controlled opposition
1 cutol 2016-10-14
Maybe he knows what lines cannot be crossed? He'd be dog food for sure if he fucked with Israel.
4 SpongeRedditor 2016-10-14
He has a life insurance!! A locked file was released some time ago that is said that passcode to open the file will be released to the public if something happens to him. I think the file is still downloadable somewhere in the Wikileaks page. I wouldn't download it tough if i was you. God knows what documents are in there, if he's putting his life on it i would assume it has some documents that you don't want anywhere near you. Its probably the kind of documents that make your whole bloodline commit suicide.
2 [deleted] 2016-10-14
But he's publicly said that he thinks the conspiracy theories on 9/11 are "annoying"!
http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-22/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-annoyed-911-truth
1 TomSawyerandJane23 2016-10-14
I thought the same thing considering Hillary is very good at getting rid of people who get in her way.
1 IanPhlegming 2016-10-14
I suspect there is a dead man's switch should he expire. That's the only explanation besides him being complicit. He's probably got something on 9/11 is my guess.
1 leftistpatriot 2016-10-14
Assange is "annoyed" by 9/11 conspiracy theories.
1 IanPhlegming 2016-10-14
Or so he says. But who knows, right? It's the refrain of our times.
1 claweddepussy 2016-10-14
I don't believe the CIA-type speculation but I've wondered many times whether he's done a deal to secure freedom from prosecution.
1 chickyrogue 2016-10-14
no way could you trust these people to hold up their end
1 claweddepussy 2016-10-14
That's the only thing that keeps me from wholeheartedly embracing the theory. Maybe if he secretly negotiated a formalised immunity agreement with Clinton/the DOJ? Perhaps after all these years he's had enough and is happy to step back out of public life. He did mention in that 10th anniversary press conference that if pressure on Ecuador became too great he would have to resign as editor. That could be the pretext.
1 chickyrogue 2016-10-14
but they are liars what agreement could be made that you would possibly trust
2 claweddepussy 2016-10-14
A properly drawn up immunity agreement with the US government, delivered to his lawyers.
I hope this theory is wrong, BTW, but I have lingering suspicions.
1 chickyrogue 2016-10-14
and what would stop them from refraining from honoring their word is meaningless
lingering suspicions ...such as [cmon spill it this is conspiracies if not here where?]
1 claweddepussy 2016-10-14
If they tried to charge him for offenses in relation to acts for which he'd been given immunity then all they'd have to do is produce the agreement to the public and to the court. All bets would be off if he started leaking new stuff they didn't like.
The suspicion is simple, that he's agreed not to release certain information in exchange for not being prosecuted. Maybe he's releasing stuff that's embarrassing but not really devastating.
2 chickyrogue 2016-10-14
it will be devastating they want it so that the dnc will not have time to switch up i think the clintoons are so stupid they are actually getting played from all directions.....
2 claweddepussy 2016-10-14
Ooh I hope you're right. Thanks for the shot of optimism.
2 chickyrogue 2016-10-14
their hubris knows no bounds but maybe just maybe ....;0
1 simplepanda 2016-10-14
If he made a deal why is he still stuck in the Ecuadorian embassy?
1 claweddepussy 2016-10-14
That would make it obvious. It would have to be a secret deal.
1 make_mind_free2go 2016-10-14
it is definitely suspect. question is: does he have potentially damaging info & was threatened OR something else? i tend to think he was threatened. (because that's what i want to believe)
1 [deleted] 2016-10-14
[deleted]
1 XanderTheZodiac 2016-10-14
Because what you see... Isn't always the truth!
1 no1113 2016-10-14
Limited Hangout. 100%. That or he's being protected by some VEEERY powerful figures. I'd be more the former than the latter.
1 0ccidentalist 2016-10-14
He's stuck in the Ecuadorian embassy for many year now and faces immediate arrest and extradition to America where he will be tortured if he steps out.
1 [deleted] 2016-10-14
Do you honestly think he hasn't stepped foot outside the doors for years? Seems improbable
1 [deleted] 2016-10-14
Yea... Seems so
0 grndzro4645 2016-10-14
He has a deadman switch with far more damaging info.
1 claweddepussy 2016-10-14
That's the only thing that keeps me from wholeheartedly embracing the theory. Maybe if he secretly negotiated a formalised immunity agreement with Clinton/the DOJ? Perhaps after all these years he's had enough and is happy to step back out of public life. He did mention in that 10th anniversary press conference that if pressure on Ecuador became too great he would have to resign as editor. That could be the pretext.
2 chickyrogue 2016-10-14
it will be devastating they want it so that the dnc will not have time to switch up i think the clintoons are so stupid they are actually getting played from all directions.....
2 chickyrogue 2016-10-14
their hubris knows no bounds but maybe just maybe ....;0