The idea we get to choose our future is a farce, regardless of who wins the government is controlled by the deep state. All this Hillary vs Trump shit is rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
56 2016-10-16 by magnora7
Just a reminder that this election doesn't really matter. The Israel-First deep state will still try and overthrow the Syrian government, and the domestic situation will continue to deteriorate. Just the same path we've been on for 30 years now.
All the media emphasis on these two candidates is to make you look away from what's happening in Syria right now, and ignore that the government itself has been almost completely taken over by banking and military-industrial interests.
This election is akin to an abuser letting you have the choice between getting punched in the gut or slapped in the face. And then making you think you did it, after it happens. "You chose this!" they will say, as they continue to destroy the middle class. "At least the other person didn't win! Can you imagine how bad it would've been if that had happened?" Trying to make you feel lucky and blessed, as we are being looted. Good cop, bad cop. Look at the right hand so you don't see what the left is doing.
It's psychological manipulation of the highest order. It's a distraction. They are playing a trick on us, so we think the important thing is the election, and that we have genuine choice. We don't. They own our political system. They own our media. Until this deep corruption is addressed, choosing our political figurehead means next to nothing. It's a gold star we put on top of a pile of shit.
Real revolution comes from self-empowerment through awakening to the reality of things, not from a single binary choice you make once every 4 years. I know you know this, but everyone needs a reminder once in a while. It's easy to get caught up in the emotionally-charged propaganda that is seeping out of every media pore, but keep your eye on the big picture even if it makes you feel alone to do so. You are not alone. The more that wake up, the more that will join, and someone has to pave the road for newcomers. We are here.
Don't get distracted by mirages created by the media. Keep your eye on the ball.
39 comments
6 DocturDread 2016-10-16
So true brother. Victory of the light!
4 soullessgeth 2016-10-16
no...to some degree it matters...obama did not invade iran despite the hysterical urging of the ziocucks...hillary might have though...
trump is the logical anti-bankster, anti-nazi response to this whole situation
6 magnora7 2016-10-16
If you think Trump is anti-zio I recommend you have a listen to his AIPAC speech. They're both sellouts to this same organization. Be real.
0 soullessgeth 2016-10-16
yeah sure but...trump isn't taking endless amounts of money and has actually criticized the us presence in syria and us support for the saudis
5 magnora7 2016-10-16
Just because he hasn't had the opportunity to be bought out yet.
Talk means literally nothing.
1 soullessgeth 2016-10-16
they aren't supporting his presidency...they could have when he became the nominee but hillary is goldman sachs' chosen one
6 magnora7 2016-10-16
Well of course they would prefer Hillary, but if Trump gets in then the deep state can start all kinds of wars, including a US civil war, and blame it on "crazy old trump" and then we'll be in for a real shitshow
0 soullessgeth 2016-10-16
you can make all sorts of unfounded, inane speculative comments but...
at the end of the day hillary is the bankster candidate and the war candidate
6 magnora7 2016-10-16
At the end of the day, they both are.
1 soullessgeth 2016-10-16
not to the same degree...
5 magnora7 2016-10-16
They're both useful idiots, for different purposes. I think Trump being seen as generally unstable could actually give them more free reign to start wars. I really don't think one is better than the other except for the PR image it conveys to the world, which is basically pointless
2 soullessgeth 2016-10-16
no dude...it's not that simple...the president DOES still have some room for influence...beyond that the deep state seems to be gradually being put on a leash and the hyper interventionists are being crushed...look at iran and cameron's recent loss
1 magnora7 2016-10-16
Sure, I mean they wouldn't have killed JFK if it didn't matter. He does have some influence, it is a powerful position. But they don't let people get that position if they don't already think the person will work for them. Trump has already shown his zionist colors, he's a warmonger all the same
1 soullessgeth 2016-10-16
not to the extent of hillary who is literally a bankster pawn and endorsed by the bush family....
it's inevitable...it's like obama versus hillary as well...nuance matters.
2 magnora7 2016-10-16
I guess. But it's not clear one will be better than the other. With Hillary we get guaranteed war in Syria, and with Trump we get guaranteed to look insane to the rest of the world and to probably have riots and on top of that there's no guarantee he won't turn around and sell out even faster than Hillary did. I really have a hard time seeing one as being better than the other.
1 soullessgeth 2016-10-16
hillary has already sold out and promised a lot of powerful people a lot of things...riots?
the police need to clamp down on these blm types...that's all i'd say in that regard.
1 justtruth_77 2016-10-16
Trump being seen so visibly against the Iraq more right now as he campaigns.. I think he would not want to reverse back on one of his major talking points so quickly. And embarrass himself like most politicians do today..
4 end_of_rainbow 2016-10-16
As you've said, it really doesn't matter -- Trump has only gotten this far because he's been allowed to do so. Ultimately, it's a win-win for the those pulling the strings. I believe he's a plant, but also the ideal Plan B. He's a litmus test & barometer for America's underbelly, and has now exposed it for all the world to see. HRC is a fascist albeit still cloaked, whereas Trump is blatantly open. With each supporter he gains, it allows more openly fascist tones and themes to be introduced versus the usual pony show required. Trump shows there's a contingent desperately wanting to be ruled in this fashion. Either way, no "candidate" is allowed if they can't be controlled in some manner. JFK (and his brother) were the last symbols to truly go against the system, and now serve as a reminder to those who forget or are in denial.
Remember: The president of the United States is the most powerful marionette in the world.
5 magnora7 2016-10-16
This is a perfect way to put it. Him winning actually opens some doors for them because they can just go "whoa, crazy trump is dragging us in to this war" while they heat things up in Syria and beyond.
I wouldn't want to be president, it sounds like the worst job in the world. Everyone is out to manipulate you and get things from you. And you live in this weird bubble of political advisers that you don't necessarily get to pick, sounds very annoying to have to balance all the endless demands and prioritize things correctly.
1 allthingsfree 2016-10-16
What if Trump is the real pick by 'the owners', wikileaks is fake, and all the rhetoric on Trump's temperment + nukes is NLP-style groundwork for him to justify using nukes in the future?
2 magnora7 2016-10-16
Exactly. Trump vs Clinton is lose-lose. They design it this way, to make us think we have options. It's like this: https://electriccaves.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/republicrats-slaughterhouse.jpg
3 m3mb3r5h1p_r3v0k3d 2016-10-16
In the full scope, the election may not matter. However, HRC gaining the white house does. If people thought Obama was bad, HRC will make him look like a saint.
2 [deleted] 2016-10-16
The future is uncertain. You never really know what will happen. Your next breath could be your last. Things could change. At least that is my feeling.
1 allthingsfree 2016-10-16
"Change". That sounds familiar.. I recall hearing it AT EVERY ELECTION EVER.
I share your sentiment, but believe OP's depiction. The owners of this global game can and will work through either candidate.
1 [deleted] 2016-10-16
But maybe not as well.
2 jack_alexander 2016-10-16
Amen. It's wonderful to see someone who thinks as I do. Actually, Believes as I do. Warfare/Prison industry/big business state.
1 noelabelle 2016-10-16
Beautifully written and well put! Thank you, OP!
3 magnora7 2016-10-16
You're welcome, no problem. We gotta help each other stay pointed in the right direction
1 junnies 2016-10-16
the problem with being so certain that the game is so badly rigged and the establishment so almighty is that one can end up overestimating them, bolstering the illusion of power they require to wield control, that one ends up feeling disillusioned and suspicious of any and every possible positive step towards fighting the establishment.
was Brexit really a 'loss' for the establishment or did they want Brexit to happen for some nefarious reason? if we assume the game is so badly rigged that no positive steps can be made, then surely we must be suspicious of Brexit, Wikileaks, and even conspiracy researchers like David Icke and Alex Jones. Perhaps the 9/11 truth movement is simply another tentacle of the establishment, created to mislead and confuse us...
Be skeptical and critical - yes. Be skeptical of Trump's anti-establishment credentials but, unless you are absolutely certain, don't dismiss the possibility that he could be 'for real'. You don't have to support him, just be open to the possibility that he could be for real, because like it or not, the Trump phenomenon has exposed the rot of the establishment (of course the rabbit hole goes much deeper, but we have to start somewhere) to a far greater extent in the American public than i have ever seen. Obama said 'hope and change (the establishment)'. Trump is blatantly stating and showing that the establishment (the state department, mainstream media, FBI, justice department, electoral process, etc) is crooked and the electoral process rigged. Conspiracy theories have never been more credible and acceptable to the public consciousness. If this is all part of the plan of the establishment, we should be optimistic about their self-destructive tendencies.
1 magnora7 2016-10-16
"The Democrats are the party that says government will make you smarter, taller, richer, and remove the crabgrass on your lawn. The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." - P. J. O'Rourke
Trump will fuck us just as bad as anyone else. I'm voting 3rd party.
0 8toborrm 2016-10-16
I agree with you on a lot, this is an awesome post, and a great metaphor that I am going to steal. That being said, here's why I think one is better than the other.
Both have the expectation of war. Both have the expectation of corruption, and lies. Both have the expectation of being controlled by the dark state. Both have the expectation of doing things only out of self interest. Both have the expectation of generally handing a shittier country and world to the people.
One of them already has the track record, and no reason to change course.
2 magnora7 2016-10-16
But Trump could sell out even harder than Hillary. The track record reduces the variance, but with Trump we literally have no fucking idea what might happen next and it could be absolutely awful. Just for the sake of the appearance of stability, I would probably take Hillary over Trump. Because Trump will probably do everything, but worse, and ham-fistedly, and everyone in the world will be laughing at us, and it may cause a lot of domestic destabilization.
Neither option is a win for anyone. I view both as incredible dangers. I wish people would vote Jill Stein. If you want someone who will actually shake things up, and has a track record of doing so, why not vote for her? Why gamble on this billionaire madman?
3 8toborrm 2016-10-16
I see the logic behind all of that. You very well may be right.
But one thing you should know is this... the whole world is already laughing at us, friend.
2 magnora7 2016-10-16
Fair enough.
Yeah, that's no reason to make it worse though. They can laugh harder.
3 8toborrm 2016-10-16
Hillary is very possibly the most corrupt politician to have significant influence in the federal government. Just remember that when you make decisions based on your fears of "what may be" with Trump.
1 magnora7 2016-10-16
Trump is basically a NY mobster billionaire, so I don't know why you think he'd be any better.
1 8toborrm 2016-10-16
You really can't see why? Really, not at all? I can put my personal opinion aside and wrap my head around why someone would vote Hillary pretty easily.
Think outside yourself a little bit. The world is a lot bigger than your meaningless opinion that will decide your meaningless vote between meaningless candidates one time every four years. This presidential stuff is just entertainment. It's the previews before the movie. It's not the real show, it's just good enough to watch.
1 Skybluvalleykid 2016-10-16
And your hair grays out like a motherfucker.
-1 Fairhope 2016-10-16
I saw an article with trump meeting some ny Cardinal that Hillary met last month. All three will be present for a Thursday dinner. That Cardinal and his ilk are those who run the land. Their tentacles are deep.
1 magnora7 2016-10-16
Happen to have a source on that? I'm kind of interested to read more
edit: is it this Dolan guy? http://nypost.com/2016/10/14/embattled-trump-melania-meet-with-cardinal-dolan-at-st-pats/
1 soullessgeth 2016-10-16
they aren't supporting his presidency...they could have when he became the nominee but hillary is goldman sachs' chosen one
3 8toborrm 2016-10-16
I see the logic behind all of that. You very well may be right.
But one thing you should know is this... the whole world is already laughing at us, friend.
2 magnora7 2016-10-16
Fair enough.
Yeah, that's no reason to make it worse though. They can laugh harder.