I think something serious is happening with Assange. London Airport Chemical Scare.
128 2016-10-21 by ravenously_red
There was a wikileaks tweet two hours ago that there were heavily armed police outside of the Ecuadorian Embassy two hours ago. Twitter and Reddit are both experiencing cyber attacks.
I also noticed that London Airport had a chemical scare. Link
What do you guys think is happening right now?
Edit: Driving home from work now -- please keep your eyes open for some news guys.
42 comments
41 ravenously_red 2016-10-21
I'm thinking they may have used the chemical scare to clear out the airport to transport him.
17 Not_a_doctor_6969 2016-10-21
Yeah that's what I was thinking. Smash and grab at the embassy, secure him under a hood in the back seat of some unmarked car. Plant people in the airport to stir up a scare and cause it's evacuation. Drive onto the runway and load him into a small inconspicuous plane and take off for the nearest CIA blacksite. With him gone, start using wiki leaks as your own platform to sow the seeds of confusion and misinformation.
5 TinyZoro 2016-10-21
Why would you need the chemical sacre for that?
11 8toborrm 2016-10-21
One unfortunate cell phone video of the transport and an utterly MASSIVE operation the likes of which may be unprecedented comes crashing down. Be on the safe side and clearr things out, create chaos, gossip, unrest.
There's little to no downside, major upside is clearing out an entire sdie of an airport where something nefarious may be in sight.
8 TooManyMenEASHL 2016-10-21
Because "excuse me folks, were secretely transporting assange now, please dont look" wouldnt have had the same effect.
30 [deleted] 2016-10-21
I am having trouble keeping up with this episode of House of Cards.
3 Stewie19 2016-10-21
Try writing flash cards. It sometimes helps.
3 imightbejen 2016-10-21
Funny how life imitates art
28 Jrheinh 2016-10-21
All I know is that if Julian Assange 'disappears' off the face of the Earth, I will be rioting
26 Glitchypink 2016-10-21
They're being very vague about what's going on at city airport, my local news says 27 people were "coughing uncontrollably" but the airport has now reopened. The reports started at about a quarter past 4 this afternoon and reopened 3 hours later. Seems a bit of a small window to evacuate, check and evaluate the situation if it was a suspected chemical incident, but I'm not an expert with these things.
My first thought when I heard about it was it had something to do or was somehow connected to the suspected device they found on the jubilee line yesterday afternoon
How close is the Embassy to City Airport?
19 bartikus 2016-10-21
27 people? If the Clinton campaign can pay people to start violence at trump rallies and bus people state to state to rig the primaries, the US government and anyone cooperating with them could easily have 27 people start coughing for a cover story.
3 cutol 2016-10-21
It'd be fun if it was synchonized coughing with Thriller dancing.
3 muscles4bones 2016-10-21
london city airport is an hour away and heathrow is less than 30 minutes.
6 EminemDontKillMe 2016-10-21
Heathrow is a significantly larger airport, no? (Genuinely don't know)
3 IsHanselHotRightNow 2016-10-21
You would be correct.
1 EminemDontKillMe 2016-10-21
Wouldn't that make an evacuation a lot less feasible or time efficient, I feel like this + a handful of other reasons is why London City would have preference over Heathrow.
2 IsHanselHotRightNow 2016-10-21
I agree. Something tells me if this was a 3 letter agency doing this, they wouldn't be using London City. They'd want him out as fast as possible, and they would have no problem arranging private flights from Heathrow or any other airfield. They would have no reason to drive to the much farther London City.
1 EminemDontKillMe 2016-10-21
I don't think you do agree with me friend:) I'm sorry my wording was kind of awkward, but I was saying I think London City makes more sense because less witnesses to move imo. However, I do see your point!
1 IsHanselHotRightNow 2016-10-21
I feel this only holds water if it's Assange trying to escape. A three letter agency would have no problems with witnesses, they wouldn't be around the public. You think they'd be going through security and flying commercial?
1 EminemDontKillMe 2016-10-21
I agree, either extraction or escape I'm sure they would just drive onto the tarmac to a private hangar. But greater population and traffic at Heathrow causes more issues than just the witnesses insides the physical buildings. I personally just feel because Heathrow is a much larger airport it wouldn't be an efficient extraction point.
1 muscles4bones 2016-10-21
yeah it's absolutely massive. large enough to have a pretty comprehensive train system.
2 ravenously_red 2016-10-21
10 miles. 51 minutes in traffic.
18 tinderingupastorm 2016-10-21
This was posted on /pol
Key Dump eta numeris 392D8A3EEA2527D6AD8B1EBBAB6AD sin topper D6C4C5CC97F9CB8849D9914E516F9 project runway 847D8D6EA4EDD8583D4A7DC3DEEAE 7FG final request 831CF9C1C534ECDAE63E2C8783EB9 fall of cassandra 2B6DAE482AEDE5BAC99B7D47ABDB3
5 ravenously_red 2016-10-21
Thank you for these! I'm at work right now but I'm doing my best to dig up info as it comes to light.
1 Suuuuuuuure 2016-10-21
I ran them and nothing
2 Johnny-Skitzo 2016-10-21
These aren't the deadman switchs
8 DontTreadOnMe16 2016-10-21
Do you have anything to support this idea?
3 Johnny-Skitzo 2016-10-21
It was proof of insurance I believe.
-4 Johnny-Skitzo 2016-10-21
They were all debunked by the autists early this morning.
6 maradesu 2016-10-21
This word needs to be replaced with the actual debunking in all cases.
It is an authority word, given trust as the attachment of agreement outlives the actual argument.
1 monicavitti 2016-10-21
Was there a thread?
2 [deleted] 2016-10-21
[deleted]
1 Johnny-Skitzo 2016-10-21
Wasn't talking about cuckchan
1 d3rr 2016-10-21
ha! the autists.
1 sep11insidejob 2016-10-21
They're heroes
1 bananapeel 2016-10-21
Link?
12 SomethingAwoos 2016-10-21
Wikileaks twitter seems to be compromised, the way its tweeting out and the language its using has been changed.
Wouldn't be surprised if one of the next dumps ended up being faked documents to try and claim its been bullshit from the start.
8 fitfrank 2016-10-21
they just posted he's ok on twitter, asking "supporters" to stop taking down the US internet.
OR
link: http://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/789574436219449345
11 Scroon 2016-10-21
Yeah, that "plea" from wikileaks seems too in line with the "Russians did it" diversion tactic. It cleverly implies that the shutdown was not government orchestrated without saying so.
7 Mental_Cramp 2016-10-21
It was a really weak post as far as proof goes.
4 make_mind_free2go 2016-10-21
not good, at all.
edit: seems like 'everything' is being done to try to curb the awakening 'cause the matrix is breaking.
3 RemoteWrathEmitter 2016-10-21
This is a really fascinating thread.
1 rotekz 2016-10-21
An area very near to Northolt airport https://goo.gl/maps/HDfiRPVnhfC2 (RAF Base in NW London) has also been sealed off and evacuted for 'hazardous materials'.
https://t.co/DPgSHCArzy
Until Assange makes an appearance I believe they are trying to remove him. These could be distractions or a holding area or maybe he has left already.
-2 RemoteWrathEmitter 2016-10-21
My guess? Some idiot new-hire security guard decided to test out their can of pepper spray.
1 d3rr 2016-10-21
ha! the autists.
2 IsHanselHotRightNow 2016-10-21
I agree. Something tells me if this was a 3 letter agency doing this, they wouldn't be using London City. They'd want him out as fast as possible, and they would have no problem arranging private flights from Heathrow or any other airfield. They would have no reason to drive to the much farther London City.
6 maradesu 2016-10-21
This word needs to be replaced with the actual debunking in all cases.
It is an authority word, given trust as the attachment of agreement outlives the actual argument.