Me too. Her husband brought us NAFTA, the repeal of Glass-Steagall, the removal of the Fairness Doctrine and welfare reform. How was he a democrat? She is the same. Other than a very few matters, she's a far right republican, further to the right than Reagan and a big fat war hawk, ready to do anything Israel tells her to do. She should make any thinking person shit their pants. She's a terrible choice, and was FORCED ON US.
Asking this question is buying into party loyalist tribal bullshit.
Republican/Democrat are just bullshit labels. Bill Clinton's policy was always more "conservative", more authoritarian than the people who voted for him would have wanted if they knew. But they didn't know. They just voted for him because he's on their "team". And if they don't make sure their team wins, the other team might win!
I understand, and will never vote democrat again. But I did want people to realize, Bill wasn't really a Dem at all, and his wife sure as hell won't be (if given the chance) either.
There will always be people like that. It's why party allegiance is bullshit. You say he wasn't one, but guess what, Bill Clinton is a Democrat. He is. And so is his wife. Your disagreement with them doesn't make them not-Democrats, it means that you shouldn't feel any allegiance to that party that they're in charge of. Just because you like your team but dislike your team's leader doesn't mean you can pretend they're not part of the team. Thats just no-true-scotsman territory.
No, sorry. I'm using what the definition of what a democrat is supposed to be, in my argument. I have not aligned myself with any party for a very long time.
She should make any thinking person shit their pants.
Yea, you see, that's the problem. People don't really care, they care to certain limit, where ''caring'' is self-serving to their interest. An example:
Knowing about politics and choosing the ''right'' candidate; you are a conformed citizen, you have nothing to hide, you are obedient and you don't question authority, because you don't question authority, ever.
Like a statement ''I support Hillary, because blah blah(whatever sexist crap you can fit in here) blah blah. They might as well say 'I'm right because you know damn well that I'm right.' It's like hive-mentality.
It's fucking disgusting. I feel like I'm living in the 40's and everyone around me is a Nazi-sympathizer. ''We know about Iraq, Libya, Sumeria and Afghanistan, but Syria is the worst because it's being bombed by Russians, and the Russians are the bad guys....''
Drop out/concede would be the words you are looking for. So, if she did, what would that mean? Who would fill her "role"? Maybe that is what people should be looking at? 4D chess...
It's not about being an English major, it's about knowing English and words (common fuckin' sense). Resign would mean she has a position - title. She doesn't, in this context. Don't hate the player, hate the game, and learn proper English while you're at it. I know twitter has dumbed people down, but seriously...
Dude. Resign is a synonym for concede, quit, retire, leave etc.
"I have resigned myself to the cause."
"You are resigned to your quarters until further notice."
"Please forgive me but I must resign my support."
"Please resign any and all questions until after the presentation."
Hillary's sole mission is to destroy the US and profit from it. So even if she doesn't win, any collateral damage that she can't cause in the interim is still a small win for her.
An old soviet tactic to use is to blame others for the crime that you are committing... Had some stupid eastern european try that on me in the recent past...
It's the only thing Hillary knows how to do. Calls Trump a Russian spy, but she literally took bribes from Russian sources in order to approve the transfer of 20% of US uranium to Putin. And the Podesta Group (connected to John Podesta, Clinton campaign chair) was lobbying for Russia during this shit too. Come on, it's fucking bonkers.
only a mere 130 or (145 million) dollars, petty change.
back when the money rolled into the Clinton Foundation, it was reported it was from Uzbekistan Uranium miners for lobbying. came in 30 and 100 million installments.
the $30M was a WTF moment, the next $100M was double WTF.
As FBIanon said, this is much bigger than HRC. This investigation will show that every branch of the government is rotten to the core. Congressmen, senators, SCOTUS judges, the media elite, the executive branch going back who knows how far are all conspirators. If we actually get to the bottom (or top) of this it's going to involve the intelligence agencies, the military, the world financial elite and foreign governments.
every branch of the government is rotten to the core.
ditto a lot of white collar peoples, theft and stealing, embezzlement (google it, its amazing the amount of).
yet the normal blue collar dude or dudette has to be honest, we have to go to work for stupid number of hours per week, ruined health and family lives, get paid $10 ph, pay insane amounts for HI and other utilities, not drink too much, dont do drug drugs are BAAAAD.
double standards all the way. fuck the elites fuck their minions and everything they stand for.
A lot of people would support Hillary over Trump, no matter what. They feel this way because they believe Trump is a racist, pedophile, serial rapist who wants to nuke the entire planet. If someone truly believes this, you can't blame them for supporting Hillary.
Jesus you just described my brother in law - and possibly my sister. smh.
they are addicted to power, and they are the best we've seen in modern history.
The Clintons are definitely power hungry, but Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Netanyahu…all better than they are.
Regardless, however, I KNOW you know she won’t resign. Not of her own accord anyway. There is this though, so we’ll see what happens.
Honestly, I don't know yet. If she hasn't backed down yet, I don't know if she will, but given that I'm not the most "up to speed" or in the know person around, I imagine that there are quite a few people that know more about what's really going on than I do.
It's pretty muddied up atm. One thing's for sure. They are going to have some people glued to their seats watching commercials on the 8th, and the respect for the american political process has taken a nosedive, if that was possible.
the american political process has taken a nosedive, if that was possible.
Pretty much. I've always known it was crap - even when I was a little kid (somehow) - but it's at least a good thing that it's becoming so obvious and out in the open that not too many people will be able to deny what a sham it all is.
I'm not talking about the realpolitik of peace-keeping missions, I'm talking about the internal stability of the western civilization/empire. Forces of "good" are sorely needed at this point, if only for the hopeful not to lose hope.
The proper forces will only be found amongst the citizenry - not amongst the elite. Those of us with the right energy have to come up and assert ourselves against the dark forces that have been working so steadfastly on this planet.
They feel this way because they believe Trump is a racist, pedophile, serial rapist
This is the entire problem with the Left, moreso than the Right in my observation. The Left don't care what sort of person someone really is morally, as long as they have a tick in the politically correct checkboxes. Hillary can be as big a monster as she likes, but as long as she verbally says that she is pro-evolution and pro-gay, no one will care what she does.
I feel deflection is their game. Trumps got ties with the russians, he's sexist, racist and a pedo, when in reality it's them.. I can't wait until the real dirt comes out were still at the top of this dumpster.
No, sorry. I'm using what the definition of what a democrat is supposed to be, in my argument. I have not aligned myself with any party for a very long time.
I'm not talking about the realpolitik of peace-keeping missions, I'm talking about the internal stability of the western civilization/empire. Forces of "good" are sorely needed at this point, if only for the hopeful not to lose hope.
36 comments
31 Carlos_Dangers_wang 2016-11-03
Me too. Her husband brought us NAFTA, the repeal of Glass-Steagall, the removal of the Fairness Doctrine and welfare reform. How was he a democrat? She is the same. Other than a very few matters, she's a far right republican, further to the right than Reagan and a big fat war hawk, ready to do anything Israel tells her to do. She should make any thinking person shit their pants. She's a terrible choice, and was FORCED ON US.
13 Afrobean 2016-11-03
Asking this question is buying into party loyalist tribal bullshit.
Republican/Democrat are just bullshit labels. Bill Clinton's policy was always more "conservative", more authoritarian than the people who voted for him would have wanted if they knew. But they didn't know. They just voted for him because he's on their "team". And if they don't make sure their team wins, the other team might win!
2 Carlos_Dangers_wang 2016-11-03
I understand, and will never vote democrat again. But I did want people to realize, Bill wasn't really a Dem at all, and his wife sure as hell won't be (if given the chance) either.
2 Afrobean 2016-11-03
There will always be people like that. It's why party allegiance is bullshit. You say he wasn't one, but guess what, Bill Clinton is a Democrat. He is. And so is his wife. Your disagreement with them doesn't make them not-Democrats, it means that you shouldn't feel any allegiance to that party that they're in charge of. Just because you like your team but dislike your team's leader doesn't mean you can pretend they're not part of the team. Thats just no-true-scotsman territory.
2 Carlos_Dangers_wang 2016-11-03
No, sorry. I'm using what the definition of what a democrat is supposed to be, in my argument. I have not aligned myself with any party for a very long time.
5 gbc-ocd 2016-11-03
Yea, you see, that's the problem. People don't really care, they care to certain limit, where ''caring'' is self-serving to their interest. An example:
Knowing about politics and choosing the ''right'' candidate; you are a conformed citizen, you have nothing to hide, you are obedient and you don't question authority, because you don't question authority, ever.
Like a statement ''I support Hillary, because blah blah(whatever sexist crap you can fit in here) blah blah. They might as well say 'I'm right because you know damn well that I'm right.' It's like hive-mentality.
It's fucking disgusting. I feel like I'm living in the 40's and everyone around me is a Nazi-sympathizer. ''We know about Iraq, Libya, Sumeria and Afghanistan, but Syria is the worst because it's being bombed by Russians, and the Russians are the bad guys....''
ಠ_ಠ
12 Bro_Hockey 2016-11-03
Resign from what? She doesn't have a job...?
3 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
6 Putin_loves_cats 2016-11-03
Drop out/concede would be the words you are looking for. So, if she did, what would that mean? Who would fill her "role"? Maybe that is what people should be looking at? 4D chess...
2 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
3 Putin_loves_cats 2016-11-03
It's not about being an English major, it's about knowing English and words (common fuckin' sense). Resign would mean she has a position - title. She doesn't, in this context. Don't hate the player, hate the game, and learn proper English while you're at it. I know twitter has dumbed people down, but seriously...
6 TheFreeMarketeer2 2016-11-03
Dude. Resign is a synonym for concede, quit, retire, leave etc.
"I have resigned myself to the cause." "You are resigned to your quarters until further notice." "Please forgive me but I must resign my support." "Please resign any and all questions until after the presentation."
2 THE_ALL_RAPING_EYE 2016-11-03
Fuck her right in the pussy. No but seriously, don't, the thought alone is one I regret putting out there.
The word he's looking for is drop-out, concede, surrender, quit, withdraw, resign, pull-out.... Oh god.. Shudder
1 kraftwerkd 2016-11-03
I think pull-out describes it best. She needs to pull out of America, entirely.
2 thedogshittacos 2016-11-03
Yeah it's usually just about getting a small amount of power over you. Typical behavior associated with sociopaths.
1 Afrobean 2016-11-03
They mean withdraw her candidacy. Pretty clear based on context.
11 thetruthhurts2016 2016-11-03
Hillary's sole mission is to destroy the US and profit from it. So even if she doesn't win, any collateral damage that she can't cause in the interim is still a small win for her.
0 spatimouth01 2016-11-03
An old soviet tactic to use is to blame others for the crime that you are committing... Had some stupid eastern european try that on me in the recent past...
1 thetruthhurts2016 2016-11-03
Are you saying that's what Hillary is doing?
2 Afrobean 2016-11-03
It's the only thing Hillary knows how to do. Calls Trump a Russian spy, but she literally took bribes from Russian sources in order to approve the transfer of 20% of US uranium to Putin. And the Podesta Group (connected to John Podesta, Clinton campaign chair) was lobbying for Russia during this shit too. Come on, it's fucking bonkers.
2 perfect_pickles 2016-11-03
only a mere 130 or (145 million) dollars, petty change.
back when the money rolled into the Clinton Foundation, it was reported it was from Uzbekistan Uranium miners for lobbying. came in 30 and 100 million installments.
the $30M was a WTF moment, the next $100M was double WTF.
9 letsgetphysical_ 2016-11-03
As FBIanon said, this is much bigger than HRC. This investigation will show that every branch of the government is rotten to the core. Congressmen, senators, SCOTUS judges, the media elite, the executive branch going back who knows how far are all conspirators. If we actually get to the bottom (or top) of this it's going to involve the intelligence agencies, the military, the world financial elite and foreign governments.
3 perfect_pickles 2016-11-03
ditto a lot of white collar peoples, theft and stealing, embezzlement (google it, its amazing the amount of).
yet the normal blue collar dude or dudette has to be honest, we have to go to work for stupid number of hours per week, ruined health and family lives, get paid $10 ph, pay insane amounts for HI and other utilities, not drink too much, dont do drug drugs are BAAAAD.
double standards all the way. fuck the elites fuck their minions and everything they stand for.
4 HiFriend03 2016-11-03
Thanks for sharing. Great post.
2 no1113 2016-11-03
Jesus you just described my brother in law - and possibly my sister. smh.
The Clintons are definitely power hungry, but Kissinger, Rumsfeld, Netanyahu…all better than they are.
Regardless, however, I KNOW you know she won’t resign. Not of her own accord anyway. There is this though, so we’ll see what happens.
1 dks42 2016-11-03
We'll see what happens? What happened and what did the videos and emails show?
1 no1113 2016-11-03
Honestly, I don't know yet. If she hasn't backed down yet, I don't know if she will, but given that I'm not the most "up to speed" or in the know person around, I imagine that there are quite a few people that know more about what's really going on than I do.
1 dks42 2016-11-03
It's pretty muddied up atm. One thing's for sure. They are going to have some people glued to their seats watching commercials on the 8th, and the respect for the american political process has taken a nosedive, if that was possible.
1 no1113 2016-11-03
Pretty much. I've always known it was crap - even when I was a little kid (somehow) - but it's at least a good thing that it's becoming so obvious and out in the open that not too many people will be able to deny what a sham it all is.
1 dks42 2016-11-03
Don't underestimate the force needed to keep the peace.
1 no1113 2016-11-03
It's not real peace if you have to maintain it through force though.
1 dks42 2016-11-03
I'm not talking about the realpolitik of peace-keeping missions, I'm talking about the internal stability of the western civilization/empire. Forces of "good" are sorely needed at this point, if only for the hopeful not to lose hope.
1 no1113 2016-11-03
Trump isn't that. Clinton isn't that.
The proper forces will only be found amongst the citizenry - not amongst the elite. Those of us with the right energy have to come up and assert ourselves against the dark forces that have been working so steadfastly on this planet.
That is the only way.
2 petrus4 2016-11-03
This is the entire problem with the Left, moreso than the Right in my observation. The Left don't care what sort of person someone really is morally, as long as they have a tick in the politically correct checkboxes. Hillary can be as big a monster as she likes, but as long as she verbally says that she is pro-evolution and pro-gay, no one will care what she does.
2 dangrullon87 2016-11-03
I feel deflection is their game. Trumps got ties with the russians, he's sexist, racist and a pedo, when in reality it's them.. I can't wait until the real dirt comes out were still at the top of this dumpster.
2 yoloswaggg1337 2016-11-03
I think its quite the opposite, she is bringing us together on a level we have never seen. .#TooBigToJail
1 ILoveJuices 2016-11-03
Mad queen Hillary
1 grimeandreason 2016-11-03
They both are. They both should.
2 Carlos_Dangers_wang 2016-11-03
No, sorry. I'm using what the definition of what a democrat is supposed to be, in my argument. I have not aligned myself with any party for a very long time.
1 dks42 2016-11-03
I'm not talking about the realpolitik of peace-keeping missions, I'm talking about the internal stability of the western civilization/empire. Forces of "good" are sorely needed at this point, if only for the hopeful not to lose hope.