POTENTIAL HUGE LEAK STARTING TOMORROW: /pol/: "Over the next few days many new documents will be released [...] will contain evidence of perhaps the largest coverup in American History.
4443 2016-11-03 by skiboarder6730
Obviously take an anonymous post with a grain of salt, but this supports the theory that NYPD uncovered a smoking gun on Anthony Weiner's computer. [EDIT, there is discussion of the pedo ring we have been hearing about No mention of a pedo ring, however]
From 4chan /pol/, posted at 2:09am on Nov 3
"Over the next few days many new documents will be released. The contents of these documents will contain evidence of perhaps the largest coverup in American History. Before this happens we would like to explain ourselves and answer a few questions you may have.
Until this month, WikiLeaks and Anonymous have worked together in building an efficient, detailed, comprehensive set of documents that would be responsible for the incarceration of Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and 21 individuals ranging from the DNC, FBI, CIA, and Clinton foundation. These documents will show without a doubt, evidence of Treason, Obstruction of Justice, Election Fraud/Manipulation, and Bribery.
This was intended to the be October surprise. But before the release of these documents, we were contacted by a member of the FBI, as well as another from the CIA, and a week later by the NYPD. All with information retaining [EDIT: sic] to something much darker than even we imagined.
Due to the nature of these leaks, we all worked together as efficiently as possible to ensure two objectives. 1.) That all necessary information would be given to the public in an organized, searchable, manageable way. 2.) Those who provided us with this information would be able to find safety before these releases were made. (This concern wasn't without warrant)."
872 comments
830 cb75 2016-11-03
man if that happens..............
588 natetheproducer 2016-11-03
If this actually happened I think the world would stop for a few days.
213 aniabub 2016-11-03
If i was a dude id assume id be getting hard over the possibility of this happening....
274 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
Can confirm....possibility of all out warfare to overthrow the govt. = rock hard erection
331 fitfrank 2016-11-03
rock hard election erection
35 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
Have an upvote
26 LeftousCrusader 2016-11-03
Ignore any and all leaks that do not come from Democracy Now, the intercept or WikiLeaks. The shenanigans are strong.
100 leocusmus 2016-11-03
Pfft, I only listen to CNN, cause that's what they said, I don't want to go to jail!
19 captainzoomer 2016-11-03
Even the most ostracized, non-conspiracy believing fool got woke that day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_X16_KzX1vE
54 leocusmus 2016-11-03
My aunt called me the other night, actually, asking me about the emails. I mentioned how I had been reading through them, she got really nervous and asked if I was worried about getting arrested.
sigh
5 IntellisaurDinoAlien 2016-11-03
Too late, it's the gulag for you.
6 jakemasterj 2016-11-03
1 million years gulag for you
4 d4rch0n 2016-11-03
People eat that shit up. People might say that everyone "woke up that day", but the people who see through it likely already knew they were full of shit and biased.
Lots of other people see on the news that there's a leak of confidential data and hear it's illegal to read and end up trusting their all-knowing TV. That's why we're here in the first place. Those that control what's on our TVs choose who win the elections
3 DisabledNeckbeard 2016-11-03
Most people only know about the law through word of mouth. I'm sure if no one ever mentioned that Murder was a crime there would be a lot more Murder's going on. I don't know if this is clear but what I'm getting at is that because a "trusted" source has told people that it's a crime they are going to believe that it's a crime because they are afraid of jail. The sad part is that I'm sure if these same people heard taking a shit was a crime they'd plug their asshole up instantly.
2 wheeldog 2016-11-03
You could have some fun with this. Invite said aunt over, and have this on your screen while you type furiously http://hackertyper.net/ and then say "Auntie, I must swear you to secrecy. I am one of the hackers bringing these stories to light". Bwahaha
2 wheeldog 2016-11-03
Or go in the other direction : "Auntie, I'm with ISIS" http://www.thecleverest.com/countdown.swf
2 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-11-03
CNN is like Pravda or TASS, Comrade.
-5 LeftousCrusader 2016-11-03
Those three organizations have maintained their integrity against incredible pressure for a very long time. They are to be trusted.
4chan not so much. A 4chan plot to meme the world with kiddie porn is to be discouraged. Try again n00bs.
2 jeffinRTP 2016-11-03
Why, are you telling me that they don't have an agenda of their own?
1 LivingInNavarre 2016-11-03
http://imgur.com/DybaU2Y
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
Erection Insurrection
26 JimMarch 2016-11-03
I once had a speaking bit in a documentary called Electile Dysfunction.
5 ti_ecraseur 2016-11-03
I like how you specify it was a "speaking" bit.
2 JimMarch 2016-11-03
Heh. I was in "Hacking Democracy" on HBO for about two seconds, from the rear :).
3 Broken_Mug 2016-11-03
speaking part in a documentary, Fuck me now
3 JimMarch 2016-11-03
Well it was better than what happened in THIS shitshow:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossballs:_The_Debate_Show
:)
2 thetouristsquad 2016-11-03
was it hard?
2 JimMarch 2016-11-03
Two minute interview...didn't need Viagra.
2 matthewfoos15 2016-11-03
Gold!
2 psych_savage1 2016-11-03
Election erection, whats your infection?
47 TexasThrowDown 2016-11-03
I mean I would like to have a change in government, but I don't think you guys realize what revolution is like. Even if "we the people" win, it will be at an extreme cost if we choose violent revolution.
43 honestlyimeanreally 2016-11-03
And the alternative is grab a pint and wait for all this to blow over at the Winchester?
7 GoofaDust 2016-11-03
Yeaaa boiiii
30 LightofDvara 2016-11-03
No violence should be necessary. Individuals are responsible therefore only individuals should be held accountable. I am desperately hoping that it is being handled appropriately.
2 KrispyKlaw 2016-11-03
All you have to do to bring around a peaceful revolution is refuse to work. Everyone, stay at home, one day, then one week, don't pay the bills- fuck em. Bring down any government that would.
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
2 KrispyKlaw 2016-11-03
I have little hope of it too. But not everyone needs to be on board, say 30%, then more will follow and it won't take long to break the camel's back.
1 PhillyWick 2016-11-03
Must be nice to have some optimism
0 LightofDvara 2016-11-03
No, not optimistic at all. I have children and it feels as if we are watching something that can become incredibly ugly. I am afraid.
14 tedsmitts 2016-11-03
Oh it might be one of those peaceful revolutions you hear so much about
2 SomeGuyInNewZealand 2016-11-03
They deliberately don't tell you about those at school. Theres been many blood-less revolutions, according to Russell Brand in his book "Revolution"
2 panzin 2016-11-03
We had one of those in the UK. Velvet Revolution or something.
1 fluffzbunny 2016-11-03
well in the US when everyone and there mother have guns and also shoot first ask questions later...its going to be a blood bath here if anything goes down.
1 Wormhog 2016-11-03
Like when Czechoslovakia split?
10 CapnBonescum 2016-11-03
necessary and worthwhile at this point.
-1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
3 Costanza_irl 2016-11-03
There is nothing more American than dissent for authority.
1 no1113 2016-11-03
Translation: I'd rather live on my knees sucking PTB cock than die on my feet fighting for my rights.
Okay then. That's you. I'd personally much rather die on my feet than live the rest of my life on my knees.
0 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
1 no1113 2016-11-03
Yours is the one that's shit that you're willing to subject yourself to being an abject slave rather than fight for your rights.
You've got it quite backward.
Pity.
1 DeathMetalDeath 2016-11-03
said every slave ever. almost what oppressors rely on.
0 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
1 DeathMetalDeath 2016-11-03
a coward then?
2 HTSMetal 2016-11-03
It surely will...but many have paid that price before throughout history fighting for true freedom.
I am no better, or more valuable than those lives were, and they made the ultimate sacrifice so that their families and children could live with hope. I've been hoping and waiting for 10 years since I first "woke up" for the powers that be to be brought to justice, and I cannot imagine anything greater coming to pass in my lifetime.
Bring it on.
2 Jacks_Grin 2016-11-03
You better strap in and grab your guns and purchase some body armor mate. It's going to be bloody, but Others who came before us have lived through this and it's a necessary cycle to kill the corruption , burn it, and bury the ashes. We can't puss out on this one. So grab your nutsack and get ready.
2 tonto1992 2016-11-03
a year ago I bought an army advanced combat helmet for shits and grins at a gun show. Who knew I might actually have to wear it
1 no1113 2016-11-03
Doesn't have to be violent. Don't assume it will be. Be ready in case it is, but don't start the violence by drawing first blood. Such a thing may not be necessary. Be ready - yes - but don't fly off the handle and start shooting like crazy because you think things'll turn violent.
Battles can be won and have been won before without firing a single shot.
1 ClintonHitSquadNum32 2016-11-03
I dont think the few in power, those named in these supposed revelations, can effectively levy their power over us if the vast majority decides they shouldn't.
Perhaps that is worded poorly,
IOW: If we the people revolt against these 16+ people, there is no army in the world that will follow them to suppress the revolt. The army is us.
1 panzin 2016-11-03
What revolution? Trump will win. Revolution won.
5 TexasThrowDown 2016-11-03
Lol, even if he does win, Trump is an establishment candidate anyway. He's a red herring that half the country has fallen for
1 DisabledNeckbeard 2016-11-03
This is the only way we will ever win. Why do you think cops have access to military grade weapon's/tanks? The Government knows it's a corrupted shithole and it's preparing for the worst.
1 _The_Black_Rabbit_ 2016-11-03
Revolutions are needed from time to time. I'm not in favor of a violent revolution because I would rather see a peaceful transition but I am not ruling it out at this point.
1 Uniqueusername121 2016-11-03
It will be worse if it's not taken down. The people have had enough.
1 no1113 2016-11-03
Revolution ≠ violence and war necessarily.
1 Harambe_Remembers 2016-11-03
military is made up of "we the people" can't see them fighting for the corrupt politicians
1 whatsreallygoingon 2016-11-03
The best revolution would be for all of us to go on self-imposed rations and to boycott every corporation that supports this madness. I wish that someone would write a digital protest app, so that we could congregate peacefully online.
1 Sluts_Love_Me 2016-11-03
Violence does solve some problems.
Better it happen sooner, as opposed to later when our kids will have to fight.
23 MrTurleWrangler 2016-11-03
If America breaks out into civil war again I'm just gonna sip tea over here in England and watch.
You damn traitors /s
6 UltraJake 2016-11-03
One if by land,
Two if by sea,
We'll use Jeremy Clarkson as a bargaining chip with thee.
1 benjamindees 2016-11-03
Just remember that no matter who wins, you're getting turned into the 51st state once it's over.
1 aniabub 2016-11-03
Aussie here, might as well join you!
12 WCC96 2016-11-03
Call of Duty: Rock Hard Erection
1 Troaweymon42 2016-11-03
I liked CoD:RHE 2 better.
12 MrRecon 2016-11-03
Yeah if we could establish some rules first that'd be great. Not entirely looking forward to anarchy
2 DisabledNeckbeard 2016-11-03
Honestly this. Being a male sucks because most of my money goes to the Government if I'm not married. But I'd like to do nothing more with my free time than stuff my fat face and play video games while getting my dick touched every once in a while. I can't see my self being able to do that if we have a Revolution.
1 RenaKunisaki 2016-11-03
Rule 1: don't be a dick.
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
2 hoboken2020 2016-11-03
Let's try to keep it peaceful.
3 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
I hope for peace but will fight if it comes to it....Nothing can stop this Freedom boner from standing erect
2 hoboken2020 2016-11-03
Just remember, both sides of the chess board sacrifice pawns. I'd rather be a diplomat.
1 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
truth
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
holy shit boys the prole revolution is happening!!!!!!!
1 greenspikefrog 2016-11-03
Rock the vote
2 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
Pork the vote
1 Btshftr 2016-11-03
Isis are in no way special or new. We can all do stuff like bayoneting a crucified person, burning someone in a cage or decapitate a kid with our bare hands.
If societies descent into chaos, prepare for all out horror.
1 garebear_9 2016-11-03
I definitely agree. Am currently hiding chubby at work thinking about this.
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
1 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
If you couldn't detect the sheer amount of sarcasm coming from my comment let me be clear. That's fucking sarcasm.
I do not wish for a violent civil war I wish for a peaceful one, one where more than just internet warriors wake up and realize how incredibly deep and fucked this rabbit hole in fact is.
That's not to say if violence came I would not fight. I believe in this country but there are only so many times that someone can thrust facts and truth in front of someone and they ignore it before shit hits the fan. This country's at a tipping point, violence can and will most likely come in one way shape or form at any minute be it foreign or domestic. I do not wish violence upon this country but I will not cower from it either.
1 Commissar_Sae 2016-11-03
Alright good, much more sensible, the sarcasm wasn't clear because it's something I have seen all too frequently online that people actually want to see violence. Sorry for my misinterpretation.
2 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
no worries it's all good Commisar
1 thinkB4Uact 2016-11-03
Government = interconnected elites corrupting the state
1 aniabub 2016-11-03
At least one person gets that i was talking about the outcome of the content, not the actual content itself. I am not a pedo.
1 HamstersAreReal 2016-11-03
Lol, I was just trying to make a joke about the absurdity of the situation. Fell flat on its face my bad!
1 aniabub 2016-11-03
The sitiation is so tense we need jokes but no ones gets that they are jokes lol im sure there are some ugly awful people who are wanting the leaks to be that for the sickest of reasons.....
1 HamstersAreReal 2016-11-03
You should see what they've been revealing over at /pol/ and rthe_donald today. They seemed to have cracked a pedo code in the wikileaks emails. Disturbing thought that people were aware of what the standard pedo code was.
1 aniabub 2016-11-03
My husband was reading me some of it last night and i nearly threw up. Its so disgusting, and that spirit cooking nearly made me pass out. Like, i just want them all in jail thats all. Im not a monster.
0 Clint_Beastwood_ 2016-11-03
If you think that's an actual possibility then you're off your rocker man. No fucking way there would be a revolution in this country. First off most of our population are too content as is and wouldn't risk their own hides. Second our government is armed to the teeth with drones, satelites and mine resistant troop carriers and shit. They are the best outfitted police and military in the world, we'd have no chance especially once they cut communications. Keep dreaming
4 inferno1170 2016-11-03
The military would likely be split if a revolution happened. Most soldiers there wouldn't fire on American citizens. Many Generals would probably side with the people too.
That said, I seriously doubt that anything that big will happen right now.
2 Clint_Beastwood_ 2016-11-03
True. I know a lot of military guys and I'm confident not a single one of them would obey orders to harm Americans unless they were absolutely convinced those people were the enemy.
3 dumpinglemur 2016-11-03
F22's can't patrol street corners, Abrams tanks can't tell the difference between a pizza guy, an insurgent l, or a bank manager. If fighting the American military was always a losing battle, we would see a peaceful Americanized Afghanistan and Iraq, not the insurgent hell hole of (current year) 2016
1 Clint_Beastwood_ 2016-11-03
That's Apples to Oranges. Afghanistan was a nightmare in terms of terrain, the fighters were hardened veterans of their war against Russia(or countless conflicts of the region), many of them flooded in from Pakistan. They were hardened fighters not some doughy middle class American's who's idea of hardship is hitting a 30 minute traffic jam on the way back from work. There was a cultural and language divide that isolated our troops and made it hard if not impossible for them to gain the local's trust and get in tune with local communities to root out the insurgents. Literally none of that stuff would be an issue here. If our Govt wanted to fully oppress a revolution in a no holds bar situation they would do it with expert analysis of social media and cell phone meta data and sting rays, they would know who is where and who is fucking with them and they would put a predator missile right through their roof. We would have no chance unless a significant portion of the US military defected. If that didn't happen we would be toast. But really that is a mute point. The fact that over 250 people upvoted for that comment is ridiculous. It's proof of how moronic part of the /r/ conspiracy community is. A revolution in this country would be hell on earth, probably worse than any to have ever taken place beforehand. And even if there was a revolution I'd bet next to none of them would have the guts to do a damn thing.
-4 Discoamazing 2016-11-03
You get hard thinking about seeing pictures of Bill Clinton having sex with a child?
5 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
no moron read what I wrote. Didn't mention CP did I?
16 ajstipcak 2016-11-03
If I was a chick this would be a total sploosh
16 sploosh_bot 2016-11-03
http://i.imgur.com/Y2WJpIi.gif
6 UhOhPoopedIt 2016-11-03
Risky click
2 ajstipcak 2016-11-03
Nailed it
0 Dtour77 2016-11-03
Stapled it
1 aniabub 2016-11-03
Im not sure what what means
1 ajstipcak 2016-11-03
Obscure reference that's over your head.
1 aniabub 2016-11-03
Ok
8 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
1 IsayLittleBuddy 2016-11-03
Ah yes, there it is.
-1 elnegroik 2016-11-03
'The Fappening'
2 HamstersAreReal 2016-11-03
Never could have guessed that we'd reach the point where we're all talking about boners and child sex rings in the same sentence....
2 aniabub 2016-11-03
Yeah but i didnt mean the content, and i hope i dont need to explain, but i was talking about all those assholes being thrown in jail
1 HamstersAreReal 2016-11-03
Dont worry I known that lol. I was just noting how ironic it was.
2 aniabub 2016-11-03
Oh good! I didnt even think when i was writing it, that it could be taken that way, i should have worded it better I think
1 dehehn 2016-11-03
Yeah... Probably not the best wording to say the release of videos of old men having sex with minors turns you on.
2 Fun-Cooker 2016-11-03
Go on
2 chinpopocortez 2016-11-03
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
2 Shakemyears 2016-11-03
Getting hard over reports of child abuse is a problem.
2 aniabub 2016-11-03
I meant the outcome, not the content, thats sick
1 Baldip 2016-11-03
You'd assume you would be getting hard at the possibility of seeing child pornography?
12 Itsbarelyillegal 2016-11-03
I think she means at seeing the world stop, or watching everybody get arrested.
1 aniabub 2016-11-03
Urgh thank you. Its awsome how everyone jumps to that conclusion.
1 aniabub 2016-11-03
No id assume id be getting hard over the fucks that will be thrown in jail. I really didnt think id need to explain that i was not talking about the content of the info, but the outcome. Come on people.
1 PrivilegeCheckmate 2016-11-03
Careful, some of those documents are under 18 pages...
Never mind...Niiiiiiice.
1 Making_Butts_Hurt 2016-11-03
Am dude. Am flaccid. Am sick to my stomach.
1 aniabub 2016-11-03
My husband was reading me some of the content and i nearly threw up. I want them all in jail this is what i meant
13 RussianUpvoteBot 2016-11-03
If that happened...
"In an unprecedented move by Major League Baseball, the Cubs and Indians will be playing an additional 6 games..."
10 ronton_soup_ 2016-11-03
Honestly, I would be devastated. As someone that works for the government, I don't know how I would handle it. I would be ashamed. I would be embarrassed and disappointed. Nothing good will come out of this except making any participating members pay for what they did.
76 leocusmus 2016-11-03
You should be proud that corruption is being rooted out and take it as a reminder that we all must be vigilant to avoid becoming corrupted and to also be brave enough to speak out when we do see corruption.
1 Evilmeevilyou 2016-11-03
Yes. So let's oust every single corrupt politician.
Hold all war criminals and their accountants, well, accountable. If we're going to burn it down, we need to do it right, not out of vengeance.
7 Spikrit 2016-11-03
I would say that this would already be a victory and isn't granted at all, sadly...
3 TurnerJ5 2016-11-03
Bullshit. We deserve and need 100% transparency.
1 clandestine801 2016-11-03
And how would you be blamed? It's easy to use blanket statements and say it's "all the government's fault." When in reality, deep rooted corruption like this is isolated to just a few of the entire population that work for the government. Those with the most power. Many others simply "take orders" as their job consists of.
Be proud that insane levels of corruption is exposed and put on spotlight.
5 eaglejm 2016-11-03
Free up space on the DVR I can't wait to see how the TV talking heads handle it or quit their jobs pretty sure the media companies are implicated to some degree.
3 PBRstreetgang_ 2016-11-03
CNN would keep spewing trash though. That and a false flag.
1 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
ftfy
1 madeinwhales 2016-11-03
Only if you think the entire world is contained within the borders of the USA.
2 GoldenTruth 2016-11-03
I'm pretty sure the actual rest of the world would also stop for a few days if the government of the #1 global superpower was completely flipped upside down and its top politicians implicated in such a scandal/taken down/imprisoned.
1 ixholla 2016-11-03
The world would stop "Spinning" for a couple days....
1 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-11-03
A veritable No Spin Zone, Pinhead! Edit to add shout out to Bill O'Rielly
1 anonymous-man 2016-11-03
And if it doesn't actually happen, it sure would be nice for there to be a big huge, loud acknowledgement of how problematic it is that people could so flippantly believe something that is such an incredibly serious allegation. Seriously, I have a feeling if the regulars on r/conspiracy would acknowledge all of the times they have been wrong, they'd find that less than 5% of the conspiratorial things they believe are ever proven to be true.
3 natetheproducer 2016-11-03
Well I can't speak for the regulars here but I don't go believing every post I see here. I don't know if there is actually organized pedo activity happening at the highest levels of our government but I do know that the language used in some of these emails is sketchy as fuck. You would have to be an idiot to read that beanie baby email sent to the Georgetown faculty and take it literally at face value. They are clearly talking about something else and arent actually trying to sell 480 beanie babies in bulk for $9,600. That one email alone was enough to make me feel uncomfortable.
1 low_la 2016-11-03
Haven't heard of this sounds interesting. Got a link?
1 natetheproducer 2016-11-03
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26263
0 anonymous-man 2016-11-03
The one email that seemed to make everyone suspicious about "pizzagate" is very easy to explain. Bill Clinton went to North Korea to rescue a hostage. The three Korean people eating pizza were the hostage, her sister, and one of their children. That's it.
This photo is being pushed as an obvious part of a pedophile ring. I would suggest that you're in too deep into the conspiracy and having a hard time spotting the allegations as bullshit.
1 natetheproducer 2016-11-03
Its more than one email, that's not even the one that worries me the most.
1 anonymous-man 2016-11-03
This story is total and complete 100% bullshit. Try to rap your head around that. I feel like if you believe this story, you have simply lost the ability to understand that some stories are just made up by deluded people.
Are you one of the deluded people making up the stories, or one of the gullible people believing the stories? Because those are your choices, deluded or gullible.
If a story like this was true, the evidence would have come out during the election. Because it's not true, it works better as a story to just act like there's some mythical force preventing the truth from coming out.
The truth is that you now are too embarrassed to admit that this story is bullshit. As Trump would say, "SAD!"
1 natetheproducer 2016-11-03
What story are you talking about? And how is it bullshit again? You said it was bullshit but failed to explain how. I have a feeling I've looked into this much more than you have because you're bringing zero information to the discussion.
1 anonymous-man 2016-11-03
I have no doubt that you've looked into this story more than I have. But what I have seen, the stuff that people are saying is solid proof, appears to be just completely tenuous garbage.
But you're too deep into conspiracy world. You have no perspective on the story, on whether it makes any sense in the world. It is a monumentally stupid allegation to suggest that Hillary Clinton's staff and husband are involved in a pedophile ring.
Here's how it works: you dislike/hate/distrust the government and anyone who is in an elite/establishment position. Hillary and the Clintons and anyone associated with her define this. Therefore, you immediately distrust anything about them, and you are excessively willing to believe anything bad about them.
So someone with an equal or greater amount of distrust than you, possibly someone with an actual mental illness, puts together some information purporting that Hillary's people are involved in a pedophile ring. And so when you start seeing evidence about a pedophile ring that most people would assume is questionable at best, you are the opposite. Other people assume that it's probably false unless the evidence is very strong, difficult to dispute. You, on the other hand, assume that it's probably true unless you see some kind of obvious evidence to the contrary. But you're never going to see evidence to the contrary because these kinds of stories are so crazy that no credible person even bothers to investigate and point out the obvious errors and fallacies in the story. Also, they know that most people like you probably won't believe the facts that disprove the story anyway, so why should they even bother?
The final level of your belief in this stuff is that you also now think that I'm in denial or haven't been properly informed or part of the conspiracy or whatever.
The only way for you to really sort this out and verify the accuracy is if you're willing to step back and consider that maybe none of it's true, to approach it with more skepticism.
1 natetheproducer 2016-11-03
Well I don't believe with 100% certainty that they're involved in a pedo ring but I'm not gonna say that they aren't either. The evidence I'm working with is wikileaks. All I'm saying is that some of the emails are sketchy and don't make sense at face value. If there is a pedo ring this wouldn't be the first time either, look up the British pedo scandal and Jimmy savile, it really wouldn't be that shocking if it was happening in America too. However I refuse to believe something isn't possible just because it's disturbing. I suggest you check out the wikikeaks emails the are worth looking into. Also /r/pizzagate has a lot of a info that's worth checking out.
1 anonymous-man 2016-11-03
You can't just say "The evidence I'm working with is wikileaks."
Wikileaks is not evidence. Wikileaks is a source.
There's this weird thing I've started to notice where people think that everything Wikileaks releases is dark, secret information that is hiding massive conspiracies. The reality is that 99% of Wikileaks information is very mundane information of no consequence.
But guess what the conspiracy theorists do? They assume the worst and then they take the leaked information (which often lacks context) and they give it the worse possible context imaginable. This is how a picture of 2 Korean-American women and a Korean-American girl eating pizza becomes proof of a pedophile ring (even though it's just a picture of Lisa Ling, Laura Ling, and one of their daughters, and they're celebrating because Laura Ling had just been released from being a hostage in North Korea).
Here's the story of the Korean-American girl that Bill Clinton rescued by visiting North Korea after they took her hostage: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=126613763
And the Wikipedia entry about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_imprisonment_of_American_journalists_by_North_Korea
1 natetheproducer 2016-11-03
Well CNN fired Donna Brazile because of what was found on wikileaks so it's not all mundane/false information. And that picture you're describing doesn't prove anything you're right, there are much more damning emails than that one. My point is that there is clearly code talk being used in some of the emails and the only reason people would do that is to hide something. Combine that with emails about having kids in a pool for entertainment for adults and the comet ping pong Instagram page and it definitely looks sketchy. I'm not saying I have smoking-gun evidence I'm simply saying it looks sketchy. Honestly though you seem a little more preoccupied with fighting conspiracy theories than actually finding the truth so the conversation is fruitless.
1 anonymous-man 2016-11-03
I didn't say it was all mundane information, and I didn't say it was false information. Yes, Dona Brazille did engage in shady practices and Wikileaks caught that, and there was clear evidence of that.
But this is different. This is not clear evidence of a pedophile ring. This is a lot of people loosely interpreting evidence from Wikileaks. Those other "much more damning emails...." Where are they? And why is it that you can't say they show clear evidence of a pedophile ring? Because it doesn't exist, at all. But the poorly argued conspiracy bullshit is alive and well on this story.
Don't get me wrong -- some conspiracies are worth checking out. This one is just really off a cliff and it makes you look less credible when you try to argue such blatantly false conspiracy theories.
1 natetheproducer 2016-11-03
"Because it doesn't exist, at all." How do you know that? I'm not saying it definitely exists or doesn't exist. My argument is that there are multiple emails that deserve investigation. I'll send you some of the emails I'm talking about when I get out of work. If your so sure there isn't a pedo ring in Washington then show me some evidence, otherwise this discussion is just me providing information and then you providing your opinion.
1 anonymous-man 2016-11-03
Sure, send me the emails. But note two things:
It's possible that some emails are false, that someone edited a small percentage of the emails. Then, if most of the emails are accurate/valid/true, it becomes easy to manipulate people into believing a lie stuck in the middle of a bunch of true (but mostly mundane) information.
Unless the emails show direct evidence, then it's just the same thing that happens always with conspiracies: a small grain of slightly odd information, and then a wild interpretation of that information.
Also note that the New York Times has now said that the story is bullshit. Not that you are going to trust the New York Times implicitly, but you should at least read the article and consider that this conspiracy might be wrong:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/technology/fact-check-this-pizzeria-is-not-a-child-trafficking-site.html
Always remember that you are more likely to believe a lie when it comports with what you already believe. So if you already hate Hillary (possibly because of false information you've read about her), then you are likely to believe new lies about her that you hear.
1 natetheproducer 2016-11-03
Lol I'm surprised someone is defending Hillary here in /r/conspiracy. I hate her because she is a pathological liar and that's more common knowledge than conspiracy. Even if she's totally innocent she still lied her way through Benghazi and the email scandals. I have every right to be skeptical of her.
1 anonymous-man 2016-11-03
1) I see that when you can no longer defend your position, you change the subject to something else.
2) I'm not really defending Hillary. I'm questioning the idea of blind distrust of everything Hillary and questioning blind trust of information that's critical of Hillary.
3) I'd love to see which lies you think she told about Benghazi. There's just nothing there, which is why she was exonerated without any punishment at all. Same with the emails -- the emails were just a relatively minor mistake in the context of the much more major scandals that have happened at the highest levels of government throughout history.
Let me put it to you this way: if you are going to be a truly consistent skeptic, then you must also consider at times when it is appropriate to be skeptical of the skepticism. You should be skeptical, that is, of the conspiracies. This is how you can separate the valid conspiracies from the ones that are likely invalid. This is also how you can ultimately present yourself as more credible when trying to persuade people about your conspiracy. And in the process, you might actually be doing important work if you are skeptical about the right things.
The problem when you push questionable conspiracies instead of pursuing more valid conspiracies is that you can actually harm the country -- you can distract us from focusing on the actual conspiracies that are happening at the highest levels of government.
Let me give you an example: there was actually a conspiracy surrounding 9/11, but it's not the super crazy truther conspiracy that most people are familiar with. The conspiracy is that before Bush came into office, the Bush administration wanted to invade Iraq in order to earn money off of a war, to get Iraqi oil, and to exert greater American imperialism around the world. 9/11 gave them the excuse to tell the American people "we need to start this war in order to fight terrorism."
But what happened? Instead of everybody questioning the Bush administration's motives for the war and the lies they told to get consent from Congress and the American people, as we should have, we had this gigantic faction of people spending years trying to prove this outlandish theory that the Bush administration planned 9/11. In the process, this actually helped the Bush administration go to war in Iraq because it made it seem like any criticism of them was a crazy conspiracy theory.
1 natetheproducer 2016-11-03
I can no longer defend my position? I'm not sure you know what my position is...
1 Ugsley 2016-11-03
Why? Seems like a huge overreaction to a local scandal. It will be the focus of gossip and shock-talk around the world but I can't see much more than that on a global level.
1 420blazer247 2016-11-03
I wish it was going back to the bush years also. There has been so much corruption going on. Let's bring down bush and Cheney and whoever else was involved also.
1 RenaKunisaki 2016-11-03
Or people would raise an eyebrow, then immediately go back to watching Fox News and forget all about it, just like they do every time.
1 OmeronX 2016-11-03
I'd imagine that's when an internet kill switch would be thrown. Then a media blackout on it.
1 thinkB4Uact 2016-11-03
I hope, if this is true and it does happen, that we don't stop digging for more connecting roots of this network of corruption. We're only looking at a few branches. It would be a golden opportunity to disinfect our system.
1 bobop6 2016-11-03
Drone strike on Assange confirmed
0 Middleman79 2016-11-03
To have a party.
121 Orvil_Pym 2016-11-03
We already have sufficient evidence that both under Bush and under Obama (with HRC as secretary of state) the US government intentionally lied to have pretexts to incite or prolong and intensify civil wars in the middle east, from Iraq to Syria to Libya. These wars cost hundreds of thousands if not millions of lives, including thousands of children's lives. The results of these wars are the breaking up of families and migration of millions, including hundreds of thousands of children, many of which are being exploited now as child sex labour, either because they are without guardians or a state, or because they have to earn money to help pay for the escape of their families from death and starvation.
All of that is well known, well documented, and above serious doubt. Nobody went to prison. Nobody even lost a job or a pension.
Even if these new allegations were 100% true, how would a few more abused children significantly add to this list of crimes? How would that lead to any arrests all of a sudden? (And, frankly, how hypocritical would that be?)
61 AdvocateYoga 2016-11-03
I mean if you think this would be anything but devastating, youre too lost in the philosophy. yes its hypocritical, but you cant underestimate the power of tribal psychology. being responsible for hundreds of deaths abroad is easy enough to explain away to people who already want to believe in you. Personally molesting an underaged american citizen is a very different political moment.
I feel you on the moral element of how fucked up this morass of the american dream actually is, but if this is true, it will be the first and only unspinnable piece of evidence added to the dialogue.
Gosh this is dark. part of me is actually hoping it did happen. fuck america.
17 d4rch0n 2016-11-03
100%. We're used to hearing about people die in the middle east whether we like it or not. We can believe it's "war over oil" and not really blame the politicians for it completely just because that's how we think our government works. People are just used to that idea but think there's nothing we can do about it.
However, you hear about a 12 year old getting her innocence de-innocented, and people are ready to lynch someone. Unfortunately it's our only hope to enact real change. No one wants to see a pedophile or someone involved in a pedophilia ring get elected or keep office. It's worse than murder in our society.
Not everyone who's corrupt is also a pedophile, but I understand hoping that the most corrupt people were complicit. It's the only way you can say "see what a piece of shit they are" and get everyone to agree. They could be complicit in the murder of a journalist and no one will bat an eye. Life is cheap in this country. Feels like it wasn't always like this, but it definitely is now.
2 DeathMetalDeath 2016-11-03
bring back the guillotine, fourth time i've said that word today. odd day.
1 AdvocateYoga 2016-11-03
Hahahahah. Great comment.
2 AdvocateYoga 2016-11-03
I saw a cool ted talk making the case that the world has actually been getting better for a long time now, but the mechanism driving this change is our growing awareness of whats actually going on, causing this generation in particular to subjectively percieve the world as having just recently gotten much worse.
1 Evilmeevilyou 2016-11-03
I'd like to see all manner of corruption taken out, not just the scapegoats of the day.
12 Skywalker87 2016-11-03
I understand what you mean, but at the very least maybe it will provide the nudge necessary for some people to see how broken things really are.
9 Mylon 2016-11-03
Someone was punished. Seth Rich was executed.
3 Fun_Stick 2016-11-03
Your pessimism made me deeply sad inside
2 musicmaker 2016-11-03
You know, you are absolutely right. What a bunch of hypocrites we all are to allow all that, but lose our shit only when sex gets involved. Thanks for that insight.
1 invertigo666 2016-11-03
You make good points. I like you.
55 [deleted] 2016-11-03
If we possess that video will we be in possession of child porn?
50 Bisuboy 2016-11-03
Someone should ask CNN whether it's legal to be in possession of that video
94 IntellisaurDinoAlien 2016-11-03
No, only CNN are allowed to watch child porn.
14 NorthAmericanYardApe 2016-11-03
they're the media, it's different for them
28 devperez 2016-11-03
Of course. But if it's true, and I don't think it is, it'll be so wide spread that it mostly won't matter. At least in the beginning.
48 HurricaneSandyHook 2016-11-03
Just remember not to post a "sigh unzip" remark in response.
13 cheers_grills 2016-11-03
What if it's BillClintonWithMinors.zip?
36 HurricaneSandyHook 2016-11-03
sigh unzip
10 cheers_grills 2016-11-03
I'm glad you are not using WinRar.
11 HurricaneSandyHook 2016-11-03
I'll just store it on my impenetrable Jaz drive.
11 cooldito 2016-11-03
Twist: it's the name of his blues CD he hasn't dropped yet
3 teefour 2016-11-03
Woah woah woah, officer. I was jackin it to Bills saggy balls.
2 zangent 2016-11-03
Make sure to get this memo to Ken Bone
3 HurricaneSandyHook 2016-11-03
Unless there are pregnant chicks, his bone won't even twitch.
1 dubmau5 2016-11-03
It is illegal.
1 TheCrimsonCorndog 2016-11-03
If the videos are heavily censored it might pass as legal. We don't really need to see the pornographic parts. A picture of children being led into a bedroom where Bill Clinton is standing in his underwear would be enough. Or it could simply be video of the guilty party talking about having sex with kids.
The bigger issue is how those who are implicated will spin this to protect themselves. "WikiLeaks knowingly distributed child pornography! Those perverts on 4chan actually watched it! Watching those videos is against the law!"
That might be enough to scare the general public into burying their heads in the sand. "I didn't see it, so it must not be real."
55 GreatSince86 2016-11-03
The thing is, it wont. The evidence they have on the laptop regarding this type of stuff is most likely Anthony Weiner's. Since he's Huma's husband ad so closely tied to Hillary it looks bad. But if they don't release it they're basically hurting the victims. So it's a rough spot. But this narrative being pushed by others is absurd. Everyone is anonymous with an anonymous source. If you can't come forward with this type of evidence then you're full of bullshit.
83 T0mThomas 2016-11-03
So... If you had evidence that some of the most powerful people in the world were involved in several conspiracies up to and including organising child sex slave rings, you'd simply supply the information signed with your real name? Exactly how long do you think you'd have left on this planet after that?
40 kangakomet 2016-11-03
Or do you find the fact that they pre warn the forces of darkness of their intent to release damaging information so that the bad guys have a chance to assassinate them more plausible? Seriously please, this is not a Bond film. They would just release it. The rest of this is just shit.
7 DaddysPeePee 2016-11-03
You give a heads-up about their impending doom so they start covering stuff up in a reckless fashion. Everything they do from this point forward would showcase their guilt. Of course, this is only if there really is all of this damning info out there.
1 GreatSince86 2016-11-03
You simply use a website like deadman.io and walk into your local FBI field office/local news affiliate.
15 T0mThomas 2016-11-03
How exactly is that supposed to play out? You walk into your local news station with this info and what? They immediately put you in witness protection? No, you go home and wait. You hope they run it soon. You hope they verify the information with the right people and it doesn't get moth balled somewhere up the chain. These are the most powerful people on the planet and you think you can expose them the same way you'd run a story on the lunch lady stealing from the donation box?
1 kerrykingsbaldhead 2016-11-03
Nobody censors you on this forum right?
6 T0mThomas 2016-11-03
Which is why these leaks are done through a source like wikileaks (much more prudent than reddit). However, you still shouldn't leak under your identity for fear of assassination, prosecution, or exile. See: Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, etc. These are the most powerful people in the world remember. How credible are you going to find my information if I'm caught in a murder or child porn investigation? Maybe a plane goes down while im on vacation; simple accident. "Oh well" for you right? For me, I'm dead.
23 IMakeDrugs 2016-11-03
You're kidding right ? I'm no foil wearing nuthead like most on this sub, but you'd be dead before a day if you didn't leave for unknown parts and hide.
16 Dick_n_a_Box 2016-11-03
Especially considering the Clinton's history of surrounding themselves with mysterious deaths. With so many around them odds are they are directly responsible for at least one of them.
-1 johnyutah 2016-11-03
I really don't know the truth behind them, and most don't either. However, being in the top game of power for 20+ years, and in politics for an even longer time, you are going to meet a ton of people who will associate with you. More than you can imagine. And some will die. I'm sure some die because they messed with the wrong people. It doesn't necessarily have to be the Clintons either. These are people who deal with powerful people around the world. It could be other corrupt politicians, the mob, etc. I do think it is strange how some deaths are reported, but you have to take into account how many people they do relations with every day for decades.
2 DeathMetalDeath 2016-11-03
some of them former lover of HRC found in a park,oddly investigated by park officials even though he was presidential staff, with the murder weapon lost, blood pooling inconsistent and carpet fibers on his shoes and no mud on them even though it had rained.
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5ap0nb/holy_shit_are_you_guys_reading_this_stuff_fbi/
here's a bunch on it. like 4 pages of FBI FOIA there.
1 AutoModerator 2016-11-03
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
-2 Mutch 2016-11-03
Hate to break it to you but you have tinfoil on your head.
1 IMakeDrugs 2016-11-03
Am I? See how many the Clintons have connection to that have come to bizarre ends?
1 kangakomet 2016-11-03
Thank you for some common sense.
1 AdvocateYoga 2016-11-03
Or youre afraid of being murdered by the most powerful people in the world.
16 rabbits_dig_deep 2016-11-03
Is this a quote from the original post on 4chan? Got a link to that post?
7 Mswizzle23 2016-11-03
Even if it did, how would you know what was completely made up and what's real? That's the issue with any kind of leak like this, it instantly lacks any credibility if it's coming from some other foreign agency. It's clearly targeted which means it's an attack directed at the Clinton campaign. There's all this shit on Clinton, but not one single mention of Trump in any of these leaks people do? Already makes me suspicious to begin with. How many of these turn out to be completely false rumors altogether? How many giant leaks are we told are gonna happen? I remember on Facebook someone said Putin was gonna present undeniable evidence that would rock the nation the US was responsible for 9/11, whatever happened to that? Like 95% of everything from unreputable sources, it was bullshit, it always was.
And actually this has happened before so the idea of a pedo ring isn't unrealistic, it's just the target, the timing and the clear agenda someone has in stirring the pot up. I can't remember the guys name, he was either a state or federal politician but he ran a pedophile ring and eventually got caught so it's not impossible, but...is anyone gonna say with a straight face there are emails from government accounts sharing pictures videos and emails of this shit... So convenient too, right before election day we hear about this. Trumps facing the same accusations but they haven't leaked a god damn thing about him this whole cycle, it's obvious what their agenda is so as far as I'm concerned, it's BS. And you should all be skeptical too until we see some real proof and analysis.
4chan's come a long way from blocking the entrance to the Habbo Hotel pool...
2 MuchoMaas49 2016-11-03
It's fucking nuts. I haven't gone to 4chan in probably 8-9 years? When I was going there (every. single. day. for years) it was all just caturday and desu spam. I actually went to the first wave of anonymous protests against scientology. It's just fucking nuts. The internet is a weird place and the world seems to be adapting to its weirdness.
5 igiveup_11 2016-11-03
NO, CNN and the MSM will NOT cover it at all.
After the election we should ALL hold everyone/anyone accountable for their actions. "Just taking orders" will NOT be accepted in America.
1 TBomberman 2016-11-03
fyi, it was supposed to be video evidence released too
1 a-big-fat-meatball 2016-11-03
Spoiler alert: it won't.
1 Arensi 2016-11-03
Where do you even read that
1 sschudel 2016-11-03
Soo... Franklin?
1 FiskN 2016-11-03
Biden doesn't like Weiner because he cut him out of the loop.
1 junglemonkey47 2016-11-03
That's been edited out of the post. I don't know why.
1 kepners 2016-11-03
This won't happen. The rich and powerful are not going to go after fellow rich and powerful.... Ffs why will you not learn. No bodies will die before any of this hit the internet.
1 AGKontis 2016-11-03
ohhhh so THIS is how True Detective starts......
1 allmen 2016-11-03
yes please
1 whatsreallygoingon 2016-11-03
I'm curious as to how that material can be legally disseminated?
1 Bealsywealsy 2016-11-03
Hillary for prison!
1 alleks88 2016-11-03
If this happens, I am sure that the election will be postponed.
But I doubt it is true
1 TouchMeHerePls 2016-11-03
It won't happen.
1 yoloswaggg1337 2016-11-03
This has not been covered up yet. They are going to tell us about 9/11. #HOLYFUCKINGSHIT
1 18hockey 2016-11-03
It fucking happened holy shit
https://redd.it/5azc9k
https://redd.it/5b08cy
1 AutoModerator 2016-11-03
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 bobop6 2016-11-03
This is gonna get shut down. No doubt. If something that damning came out,Assange is fucked. The media will claim it's fake, Dems will say it's Russia...we'll really see how deep the corruption goes.
1 OB1_kenobi 2016-11-03
That's gonna put a chalk circle around someone's political ambitions.
1 satisfyinghump 2016-11-03
Well its been two days... Anything other then the mole in DOJ that gave Hillary's team (Podesta) a heads up...?
1 kangakomet 2016-11-03
How's this information release going.. I'm sure you'll say it was covered up, but just imagine... And go with me here.. What if there was no information? MIND BLOWN!
0 Really_Elvis 2016-11-03
Not gonna happen before the election.
2 Legalise_Gay_Weed 2016-11-03
I hate it when people, like you, speak with such certainty about something when you can't know for sure. Not only that, but you provide zero proof to back up your claim.
2 colordrops 2016-11-03
What? There is no proof that these leaks WILL come out. Its just some random anonymous poster from some shady forum. Based on historical evidence, most of these pre-announcements have been false. Preannouncements are a new form of disinformation.
1 Legalise_Gay_Weed 2016-11-03
I'm not talking with certainty and providing nothing to back it up, but he is.
1 Really_Elvis 2016-11-03
Get back with me Wednesday. MAGA.
0 amiatthetop 2016-11-03
Except Bill Clinton isn't running for President.
0 [deleted] 2016-11-03
How could anyone believe any of that though?
With today's tech its entirely possible to make CGI videos of any political leader doing any terrible activity. Video, with sound, it does not really matter.
I wonder which political leaders will get totally screwed, and possibly murdered by the people, when a fake video of them comes out in all of their likeness.
-4 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
6 ZackMorris78 2016-11-03
Hey man most of us in your fugue state usually just jerk off and sleep it out. Flog that dolphin and check back in ok?
-1 rainbowdragon22 2016-11-03
Would had the pill not just had me castrated
5 THE_DARK_L0RD_SATAN 2016-11-03
k
1 worstsupervillanever 2016-11-03
Found the penguin of d00m.
594 varikonniemi 2016-11-03
IWantToBelieve
..but i won't. There have been so many ridiculous claims lately i will believe once it happens.
126 dks42 2016-11-03
If they had something it should have been released already. But no we have to wait so they can't replace Hillary. But no we were contacted by the government and they told us a story that we completely believe so we are still researching. Everything will be released in a few days. Trust us.
40 msoc 2016-11-03
Any idea why they don't want to replace Hillary with Bernie? I'm still hoping for a "fair election".
48 mikeespo124 2016-11-03
Because it's already too late. Hillary is the candidate, bar incarceration. The ballot was already finalized weeks? ago. This is not a valid point
2 skgoa 2016-11-03
Even with incarceration. Hillary Clinton is the candidate and is likely to become president. There is very little that could change this at this point.
2 ttstte 2016-11-03
Yes even if she's incarcerated she'll be made president.
4 oversettDenee 2016-11-03
Even if she dies she'll be president
1 RedditIsTheNewDigg69 2016-11-03
It is a valid point. We have a very serious problem in this country. The Democratic Party has rigged the election and installed a sham candidate in Hillary Clinton, in a total affront to our Democratic process.
They even have untold $hill$ on this very forum who go around minimizing, distracting, arguing with, and gas lighting actual American people who pay the taxes.
Nobody in America has to or should consider any Clinton as legitimate. Nobody has to accept Hillary. The lines for Bernie Sanders at the caucuses were very long.
The Clintons are a crime family.
20 CrucioA7X 2016-11-03
Early voting has started. It's too late for that.
-1 Roaro 2016-11-03
Yea I voted last night and I know my sister in law voted for Hillary by absentee ballot already.
1 ThePotatoeWithNoMass 2016-11-03
Trump support maybe... that's what we're all thinking.
1 changingheroes 2016-11-03
They argument, which i find dubious, is that if they released it too soon they would just get rid of Hillary. But the problem is so much bigger than just her.
1 bonestamp 2016-11-03
Because Bernie is ethical and doesn't fuck the country in exchange for stuffing his pockets. That might be the kind of person that that we want, but it's not the kind of person the powerful elite want.
-3 dks42 2016-11-03
Because Bernie wouldn't win.
Edit: I mean I'd vote for Bernie of course...
9 mightier_mouse 2016-11-03
Yea, the FBI contacted anonymous... because why? Also, what, do they have them on speed dial?
1 dks42 2016-11-03
What are you talking about? Okay, I know what you are trying to say, but what are you really saying?
9 mightier_mouse 2016-11-03
Oh, I just think the whole story in the post doesn't make a lot of sense. They claim the FBI, CIA and NYPD contacted them? Doesn't make any sense. Also, the way they dropped "october surprise" in there further convinces me it's just some kid on pol spouting nonsense.
6 Wormhog 2016-11-03
Yes, "this was supposed to be the October surprise" makes it feel like bullshit to me.
1 dks42 2016-11-03
You must have a problem with reading comprehension then. That's exactly what my post was about :p
Could have been clearer I guess.
2 Discoamazing 2016-11-03
He was agreeing with you. He understood your post and was expanding on it.
2 dks42 2016-11-03
You're right. I need new glasses.
1 LBJSmellsNice 2016-11-03
I mean if she's found guilty of any crimes then she'll have to be impeached, so then we'd have Kaine as president.
-1 dks42 2016-11-03
Sounds like a good compromise.
6 eaglejm 2016-11-03
Did you watch the VP debate? He is one horrible person with a matching personality.
0 LBJSmellsNice 2016-11-03
After the shitshow the presidential candidates are putting on id be more than happy to have him as president. Probably won't do all that much but at this point that's almost a positive since the alternative is worse
0 Wormhog 2016-11-03
Beats Trump or Clinton.
1 Gackt 2016-11-03
lol no
1 dks42 2016-11-03
Just no.
1 Trump_2016_Wall 2016-11-03
I'm starting to think that Anon is a bunch of fucking trolls.
1 dks42 2016-11-03
The plot thickens. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OauLuWXD_RI
1 siamthailand 2016-11-03
Any day now...
79 Trash_Golem 2016-11-03
Exactly. More unsubstantiated, vague, or circumstantial bullshit that most people can easily blow off, strategically released in timed bursts by people desperate to prolong the relevance of their stances and opinions. There are too many people here that think anything is proof of anything.
11 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
3 chilledheat 2016-11-03
Nailed it.
22 [deleted] 2016-11-03
Remember remember the 5th of November
2 oversettDenee 2016-11-03
Something something in the month of may
2 ttstte 2016-11-03
Nothing is going to happen. I'll take some bets over here.
2 CoolLikeAFoolinaPool 2016-11-03
If I've learned anything from reddit it's never hop on the hype train. Most times its the let down train.
2 28_Cakedays_Later 2016-11-03
Agreed. What is the source?
1 vgza12 2016-11-03
The confirmation bias is strong in this sub
393 allthingsfree 2016-11-03
How many f-ing times with these "this one's it!" posts? It weakens the affect of confirmed news. Seems everyone but us in this sub has "breaking news" fatigue now..
124 colordrops 2016-11-03
The pre-announcement is the new disinformation technique.
5 noMotif 2016-11-03
Good point.
2 037_Engineering 2016-11-03
It also softens the blow. Someone says "PROOF!" and it isnt...its just evidence but people now dismiss credible evidence because it isnt the smoking gun they thought it would be. On its own without the sensationalism the evidence would mount up to something severely damaging but we think less of it because it isnt what we want it to be.
2 PODSIXPROSHOP 2016-11-03
You fucking said it man.
2 subdep 2016-11-03
It muddies the waters, poisons the well, and fatigues the population.
This lessens the punch of actual leaks.
73 friskmym33t 2016-11-03
Breaking news: "breaking news coming tomorrow"
13 Citizen001 2016-11-03
Sounds like my kinda network. I'm lazy to.
12 ShadowMessiah333 2016-11-03
Checks out. Couldn't even be bothered to finish typing "too" :-).
34 sschepis 2016-11-03
This sub has been completely taken over by T_D retards. I want my alien conspiracies back.
25 MikoSqz 2016-11-03
I feel like I've literally seen this same headline get to r/all from this sub every day for as long as there's been an election coming up.
2 aesthetic-as-fuck 2016-11-03
The noise to signal works in the establishments favor. There's too much information, true and untrue.
367 Absolut00 2016-11-03
Remember, remember, the 5th of November The Gunpowder Treason and plot; I see of no reason why Gunpowder Treason Should ever be forgot.
120 Star_forsaken 2016-11-03
Ho Lee Fuk
66 Mike_Dab_Bab_Clock 2016-11-03
Sum Ting Wong
38 DEEP_SEA_MAX 2016-11-03
We To Lo?
29 Bignrollin 2016-11-03
Bang Ding Ow
1 lurkatar 2016-11-03
Fuk me? Fuk yu
1 Mysteriousmumu 2016-11-03
More chins than a Chinese phone book.
1 fragglemook 2016-11-03
Hu Flung Dung?
-1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
3 ZapPowerz 2016-11-03
Cream of sum Yung gui.
0 DaGreatPenguini 2016-11-03
Wun Hung Lo
-1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
4 The_Stoney_Badger 2016-11-03
Taco!
6 notfixed 2016-11-03
username checks
-2 z_megalomaniac 2016-11-03
Sofa King We Todd Ed Hehe, you say funny thing.
ATHF Forever!
31 LeftousCrusader 2016-11-03
Ignore any and all leaks that do not come from Democracy Now, the intercept or WikiLeaks. The shenanigans are strong.
9 dirty-E30 2016-11-03
What about DCLeaks? Seems like they were fairly on-point with the Open Society documents.
2 dks42 2016-11-03
I'll always remember
The chill of November
The news of the fall
The sounds in the hall
The clock on the wall
Ticking away
"Seize the Day"
I heard him say
Life will not always be this way
Look around
Hear the sounds
Cherish your life
While you're still around
-- Dream Theater
1 DerpsterIV 2016-11-03
I have limited knowledge of the gunpowder plot. Can you explain what it has to do with this?
11 EpicRussia 2016-11-03
Anonymous associates themselves a lot with V for Vendetta.
The gunpowder plot was about bringing down parliament.
The date of the plot (nov 5) is upcoming.
Pick any one of those
10 dr_pepper_35 2016-11-03
It was actually about Catholics trying to remove a Protestant government. It was essentially religious extremists blowing up a building, which sounds rather familiar...
2 steemboat 2016-11-03
And was quite overblown. Hahaha...joking aside King James I was a crazy dude who whole heartedly believed witches were real. Also thought everyone was out to kill him. Some in fact were, but the gunpowder plot would never come to fruition due in part to his extreme paranoia.
Had to do some research for it. Really interesting bit of history with a lot of false discrepancies being repeated by people.
1 secondsecretscrotum 2016-11-03
Sounds interesting. Have any good links?
1 steemboat 2016-11-03
You know I don't think I saved any of the links to the journals, but I do remember watching some corny tv show about it. I'll link it if I can remember
1 benjamindees 2016-11-03
Monarch mind control was FOR MONARCHS.
3 lambastedonion 2016-11-03
And three days before the election.
3 Citizen001 2016-11-03
They are all forgetting that it has since become a symbol to resisting tyranny.
2 ugly-casanova 2016-11-03
The date I presume
1 dehehn 2016-11-03
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Fawkes_mask?wprov=sfla1
1 eaglejm 2016-11-03
Yeah I'm gonna think anonymous if they are playing a central role in thus would bend over backwards to release on that day. I thought this week would be better wikileaks sort of disappointed but that only leads me to think that whatever they do have will be so damning even released last minute will be enough for her to resign or get no votes on election day.
1 hfield_ 2016-11-03
OH SHIT
212 sundevilsf 2016-11-03
If I had a nickel for every time "Here comes the big one" turned out to be a massive disappointment. Wanting to believe is no longer enough, especially with Anonymous who has a terrible history of over promising.
94 Afrobean 2016-11-03
CNN said it was illegal to look at Wikileaks. They about to release child pornography featuring Bill Clinton and others? It soon will be illegal to view Wikileaks at that rate. This is going to be a god damned clusterfuck. I'm actually scared.
82 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
12 UhOhPoopedIt 2016-11-03
The question is, who's holding the Gom Jabbar to our necks?
4 LeftousCrusader 2016-11-03
Ignore any and all leaks that do not come from Democracy Now, the intercept or WikiLeaks. The shenanigans are strong.
6 alexdrac 2016-11-03
As in the Soros funded organization ? How fucking high are you that you would trust anything from the Devil himself ?
0 LeftousCrusader 2016-11-03
Amy Goodman provides solid truthful reporting. Time and again for nearly twenty years I have heard things for the first time on her program that seemed outlandish to me, then watched in horror as they turned out to be the absolute truth. This happened with voting machine fraud back when Bush was still president, for instance, and the Weapons of Mass Destruction claim that Bush made before the Iraqi invasion. She's a valuable resource and I couldn't care less how she pays her rent.
I fully understand why you guys don't like her: topic selection. She's definitely biased in that way, but she's honest in the interviews and her outfit is a grade a prime bullshit detector.
So are WikiLeaks and the intercept. All three organizations are extremely vulnerable to false sources. They have exhibited their ability to manage the problem. We need them working for us now in that way simply because there are no other organizations on the planet that can do a better job of it.
4 alexdrac 2016-11-03
Everything the Devil touches becomes tarnished by his taint forever.
This is not the time to take even the smallest change at people who may or may not be playing for the other team. (by other team i mean the enemies of mankind - the ones giving Soros his orders)
16 SchlangeHatRecht 2016-11-03
It is illegal to host/share child porn, so I would imagine there is risk in releasing this stuff, right? The sick part is that folk need to see it to shock them awake. This is all terrifying, I agree.
34 Afrobean 2016-11-03
It's just too bad that if this comes to pass, CNN will say "Wikileaks hosts child porn from Russia" and "Assange confirmed pedophile because Wikileaks distributed child porn".... Without saying why they would distribute such a thing.
30 norinv 2016-11-03
MSM is dead. This is the end of them. The are on the roadside of history. This saga will bring back true journalism and young people will lead the way out of darkness and corruption to true the country.
10 darkesnow 2016-11-03
This is what happens when the Fourth Estate becomes the Fifth Column.
1 cerhio 2016-11-03
You say that like nobody's watching them anymore but the truth of the matter is the alt right that isn't.
1 norinv 2016-11-03
I agree that the left is watching them. :(
5 Nixplosion 2016-11-03
If wikileaks were smart they would send the photos to police/FBI etc with an explanation of what/why.
9 SchlangeHatRecht 2016-11-03
There would be a breaking story on the news of Clinton et al being led away in cuffs and the real reason would be delayed for a day or so before the public was informed. I'll accept it.
2 mightier_mouse 2016-11-03
I mean, they could censor it heavily.
15 norinv 2016-11-03
THIS my friend, is how it feels to be alive during one of the greatest moments in our history - to see true patriots stirring to battle with righteousness in their hearts for their country and freedom. I think my fear is other countries seeing our moment of disruption during a constitutional crisis (which this is looking like) and taking advantage of it. We have a lot of pay to players out there around the world and a lot of enemies. Remain vigilant.
8 Middleman79 2016-11-03
until the AG tells all the letter agencies to ignore the evidence...again.
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
3 Middleman79 2016-11-03
only going on past events...
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
2 Middleman79 2016-11-03
I can, I'm quietly excited. I just don't want a heart break again. hope for the best but plan for the worst.
1 OneThinDime 2016-11-03
Lol
12 NumNumLobster 2016-11-03
I'd imagine they'd censor it in the media (at least the victim and sex parts). I bet it would still get released though. way too big a story someone would do a freedom of the press defense
9 Glass_wall 2016-11-03
That would explain even further why they saved it for last. You know damn well any source that releases it is gonna be shut down for child porn.
1 modalert 2016-11-03
I'd wear that a badge of honor in this case.
1 cerhio 2016-11-03
Just curious, how old are you? I want to try to understand how someone can think /pol is a reliable news source.
1 dehehn 2016-11-03
You're scared of fan fiction then. This is just a scary story to tell on the dark. There will be no release.
1 Afrobean 2016-11-03
No matter what happens, things are going to get worse before they get better. They might not go as dark as these particular rumors indicate, but we're going to be in for trouble one way or the other. We already have the DOJ and President stonewalling the FBI and covering up obvious crimes of a presidential candidate as their crimes get exposed further and further every day. We're living in strange times.
88 WretchedOwl 2016-11-03
There are like 5 of these fucking posts every fucking day you dense motherfuckers!
5 PM_MEMONEYYY 2016-11-03
Maybe CTR are the ones making these posts so whenever someone genuine actually makes a post, they are rounded up into the rest.
1 WretchedOwl 2016-11-03
You belong here
5 PM_MEMONEYYY 2016-11-03
Yet, here you are.
4 WretchedOwl 2016-11-03
This pile of shit was on the front page
3 werkshop1313 2016-11-03
But tomorrow...
85 Ras-Al-Ghoul 2016-11-03
I want to believe, but this is cutting it awfully close to the election. Only 5 days now, and It usually takes a few days after a leak for the MSM to even acknowledge it, this is cutting it close enough that even the most damning leak could be too late. If she gets elected they can put the blame on others or have Obama pardon people who would otherwise have to testify against her.
I know Wikileaks has said they aren't doing this to directly effect the election, but if they want to be about gov't transparency, voters deserve to know who they're about to potentially elect as leader of the free world. it would be really shitty if they wait until after the election to release the bombshell, and Hillary wins then has to be impeached.. maybe they just to watch the world burn.
22 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-03
The election won't matter
22 Duckerr 2016-11-03
Won't it matter if Shillary wins? Even if she gets indicted, the Dems will control the White House, right?
39 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-03
I'm guessing she'll be arrested and the DNC implicated in election fraud so the election will be with no confidence and redrawn to take place before Jan 20
29 Middleman79 2016-11-03
then vote bernie bitches!
41 bananabanging 2016-11-03
How can you possibly still support Bernie? Have you forgotten that he's spent the last fucking months campaigning for the candidate that represents everything he supposedly stood against? How can you trust someone who sold out so easily for anything? Much less the presidency...
68 another_busted_robot 2016-11-03
Because his support has been based on the premise that Trump is just as bad for the country and, from his perspective at least, worse than Clinton. Which is a fair perspective. Both Trump and Clinton are morally bankrupt, corrupt trash. There's really no way to "pick a side" in this situation if you believe in the system at all, which as a career politician I'm sure he does. He's doing what he thinks is best within the bounds of the system he believes in. If you disagree with his choice, cool. But don't completely vilify the man for operating within the bounds of a system that isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
15 RandallWho 2016-11-03
Also lets add that Bernie can accomplish more for his beloved agenda with HRC and a Democratic senate then with Trump in the house.
8 another_busted_robot 2016-11-03
I'd like to see him start the formation of a third party that can be taken seriously. The Republicans and Democrats are so far removed from reality and no longer seem to represent a lot of the populace that being forced into their framework in order to meaningfully participate at this point just no longer makes sense.
1 037_Engineering 2016-11-03
http://harpers.org/archive/2016/11/swat-team-2/
Any self respecting democrat needs to read this. Anyone interested in salvaging what is left of the 4th estate needs to read this. Anyone that voted for Sanders needs to share this.
7 bananabanging 2016-11-03
Then it's been based on a false premise. I don't disagree that Trump is morally bankrupt but to say that he's on the same level as Clinton is just delusion
16 another_busted_robot 2016-11-03
No it isn't. Personally I think Clinton is worse than Trump. Trump is a buffoon, a liar, and a misogynist. He's also a politically ignorant moron. He spouts a lot of nonsense that a president would never be able to actually do. Clinton is just utterly corrupt, obviously dishonest and manipulative, and completely willing to sacrifice or sell out others to attain her own goals. The fact that her campaign has been pushing for a conflict with Russia in order to deflect attention from her many scandals is the most frightening element to come out of this whole ridiculous mess of a campaign season. Ultimately the thing that makes her worse in my opinion is that she has the political savvy and network to be able to really damage the country in ways we would not be able to unravel for decades. That being said, I understand that others may not view the situation in the same way I do, and I'm not going to shit on then for their opinion. Personally I think Sanders should've run third party. He's probably the only person that's ever had a chance to win, and that could've really changed the political landscape. Instead we get two assholes campaigning on which one is worse than the other.
4 changingheroes 2016-11-03
Because he beat 15 people in the Republican primaries? Because he's a wealthy businessman who raised his kids so well even Hillary commented on it?
You can disagree with him on issues, but that isn't the same as lying.
Because he called Rosie O-Donnel ugly? Yes, Trump says mean things, but that doesn't mean he is sexist. He says the same stuff about men. Women aren't little children, they don't need you to protect their feelings.
Like Obama's Hop and Change? Like Obama's claim that he would lead the most transparent administration ever? Setting lofty goals sets the tone as a leader and gives people permission to think creatively about issues.
If you want a 3rd party candidate to win, vote Trump. He's not a Republican. Bernie is more of a Democrat than Trump is a Republican.
Most of your arguments against one of the candidates are just hallucinations.
4 another_busted_robot 2016-11-03
Take this delusional garbage back to r/The_Donald.
-5 changingheroes 2016-11-03
Good argument! You're so open-minded!
2 Homosapien_Ignoramus 2016-11-03
His response had as much weight as your initial retort.
Good argument!
-2 changingheroes 2016-11-03
Aw CTR is trying to infiltrate this subreddit too?
5 Homosapien_Ignoramus 2016-11-03
You're either a small minded fool or a troll, not everyone who disagrees with you is CTR or "hallucinating".
-1 changingheroes 2016-11-03
Well, when you provide no evidence for your original argument. And when you put forth no counter-argument, other than to repeat your initial lies.
Then yes, you are either paid for by CTR or are hallucinating reality. Either way, you are close-minded and aren't arguing in good faith.
2 Tantric75 2016-11-03
Wait a minute. Are you really trying to say that Donald J Trump is not Lying?
Every third word the guy says can be proven to be false. Most items without equivocation.
Not a sexist? Have you looked at the guy's tweets?
I guess this kinda explains Trump's short lived popularity. People like you have somehow found a way to completely ignore reality.
Its totally cool to not like Hillary, but saying that Donald Trump is honest is the biggest fucking joke I have ever heard.
-2 changingheroes 2016-11-03
You have put forth no actual arguments in your post. You simply repeated the same hallucinations over again. People like you have somehow found a way to completely ignore reality and are brainwashed by the mainstream media using the oldest trick in the book: a lie repeated enough becomes truth.
4 Tantric75 2016-11-03
As if you would even read an argument against trump. There is info all over the place.
This article is just the lies he said in a week in March: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/trump-fact-check-errors-exaggerations-falsehoods-213730
Of course, this is all MSM, so it must be false right? They include verifiable sources. Something Trump has never done.
So who is brainwashed? Someone believing Trump with almost 0 support for anything he says, or someone who can call that bullshit?
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
1 another_busted_robot 2016-11-03
I agree to an extent, but I don't think Trump's motivations are in the right place. He always runs for president, always as one of the joke candidates like the various porn stars and Vermin Supreme. He's says a bunch of funny outlandish stuff, flies around giving speeches, and then drops out and supports some other candidate after getting all kinds of attention. I don't think he had any intention of things being different this time, but the Republicans have gone so far off the deep end and spent so much energy courting this kind of extreme, ignorant base that his outlandish statements started to gain some traction with a lot of people and it all just got out of control. Now he's just going for it because why not? Coupled with Clinton's pathological inability to appear even reasonably likable, and of course all the scandals, it's like the perfect conditions for a once in a lifetime shit blizzard.
5 PlumRugofDoom 2016-11-03
Agreed. Trump = bad as Clinton= mental gymnastics
1 bananabanging 2016-11-03
People can convince themselves of anything it seems
1 RandallWho 2016-11-03
That's really just subjective.
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
15 Middleman79 2016-11-03
because I believe he was threatened, either personally or for people he cares about.
0 Dsnake1 2016-11-03
So he bends easily? Is that what you want in a president? If he can spend his time campaigning for the candidate who represents everything he stood against, why would he be any different in the oval office?
3 NotDroopy 2016-11-03
Dead people can't be presidents
1 Geralt23 2016-11-03
I don't understand why you got downvoted for this.
1 Dsnake1 2016-11-03
Me neither. Bernie Bots, though.
Honestly, if he shilled out for money or fear, you'd think this sub at least would realize he would just be a standard puppet in office anyway. It's not like the people that are compelling him to act as he is now would have just given up and gone home had he won the primaries.
5 snow_ninja 2016-11-03
Seriously. Bernie seems like a decent guy but he sold out. He got cheated and peacefully fell in line. I lost all respect for him when he didn't stand up for himself. I can never vote for him again knowing that he wouldn't be able to stand up for our country.
6 Malkron 2016-11-03
WTF are you talking about? Did you want him to be a pouty bitch about the whole deal? Yea, he got cheated, but he knows that throwing up his hands and saying "alright, fuck you guys" wouldn't get anything useful done. His campaign was always about changing the discourse of the DNC, and he's accomplished that. Having a big ego isn't good for being President, as evidenced by Trump.
1 snow_ninja 2016-11-03
He would of Won if the DNC didn't purposefully cheat him out of what he deserved and earned. In a fair race he would of beat Hillary and honestly would of probably beat Donald too.
But it wasn't a fair race.
Bernie has surrendered to all of the corrupt powers that he claimed to be fighting against. It has nothing to do with ego, it has to do with sticking up for yourself. If he can't stick up against the corruption of his own party then How can I expect him to reform our entire country?
1 Malkron 2016-11-03
I completely agree. What they did was a travesty. They didn't even do a good job of hiding it. FFS, Debbie Shultz was made head of Clinton's campaign mere hours after her resignation was announced. You can't get much more blatant than that.
He has done nothing of the sort. He realizes that the situation is a complex one. Now, he had two options here.
He could do what you suggest and lambaste the DNC (who definitely deserve it). He had a HUGE following made up of a very important demographic for the Democrats. An antagonistic approach would fracture the party and even drive some of his base to vote for whoever wasn't Clinton. That obviously means Trump. He believes that a Trump presidency would be even worse than a Clinton presidency (even if she was elected fraudulently).
His other option is to work from the inside to push the platform of the DNC closer to his own. He has actually been quite successful in this, and has forced Clinton to take on more progressive policy in order to secure the vote of his base. This is the only option that actually furthers his dream for the country. His humility in this is not a weakness, but a virtue. He doesn't care about personal power (unlike Clinton), he cares only about moving the country in a more progressive direction.
From the beginning he knew that winning the primary was a long shot, and his campaign was always primarily about creating a grassroots effort that would change the discourse in our political system.
It's not about him, it's about progress. He will do whatever it takes to push his agenda, even if it means endorsing a cheat. His endorsement keeps him at the table.
Also, it's not "his own party". He's an Independent that caucuses with the Democrats. He runs with the them for the same reason he endorsed Clinton after she "won" the primary. He knows that in order to push his agenda, he has to play with the big boys.
2 snow_ninja 2016-11-03
Thank you for your reply. I appreciate your insight and opinion. We just agree to disagree.
1 Mysteriousmumu 2016-11-03
I have to agree, I was so crestfallen the first time at the democratic convention we need to get behind Shillery. No real Bernie fan would do that. I was so hoping he would tell them all to fuck off and join a third party and when that didn't happen I gave up on him.
1 RandallWho 2016-11-03
Quite possibly Bernie believed that throwing in with Team Hillary made a lot of sense because A) Trump and B) if HRC as president and if the Dems take control of the senate at any point Bernie can use his leverage to be thorn in HRC side.
if you think Bernie is going to just roll over if / when HRC gets elected your wrong.
Throwing in with HRC was a very good move for Bernie and his agenda.
This election is more then just the candidates.
1 rainbowdragon22 2016-11-03
There will be no election fucking believe people, believe!!!!
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
1 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-03
Please film it.
1 faultydesign 2016-11-03
RemindMe! 20 jan /r/conspiracy gets one wrong once again
1 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-03
Remindme! January 20, 2016
1 Calamity1x 2016-11-03
We can hope...
1 forefatherrabbi 2016-11-03
There ia nothing in the constitution that allows for this. (except for the possibly the electoral college, but that is not a revoting). She would be sworn in, and then if she is removed, Tim Kane becomes president. If he is removed, then it goes to the speaker of the house. But the senate needs to convict both of them, and will likely be under control of the DEMs
0 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-03
Don't forget we are in a state of emergency still. Cog will be enacted.
1 forefatherrabbi 2016-11-03
No we are not.
0 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-03
Correction we aren't. I assumed we still were as we are at war. But that idea changed not to long ago.
0 RICH_HOMIE_XORBAX 2016-11-03
We'll have to have a do-over.
BidenWhoever's highest in the line of succession and not implicated in the scandal can stand in as President for a month or two while we figure out how to do a ranked-choice or approval vote in the middle of March or so.8 Bericshawbrad 2016-11-03
Lol if this shit is true you really think Biden isn't one of the molesters
1 RICH_HOMIE_XORBAX 2016-11-03
Touché. I've edited my post and fixed the error.
1 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-03
His videos around kids are creepy.
1 HillaryBrokeTheLaw 2016-11-03
She gets pardoned by Obama, who will remind us to look forward and hope . . . .
7 Middleman79 2016-11-03
fucking kids won't take days to get covered. everyone one of killarys soap box msm will jump ship and report on it. it's a smear that no one wants to be anywhere near, that's why TPTB use it against people. it's like having dog shit on your hands, you can wash it but the smell still lingers and taints everything you touch.
1 Malak77 2016-11-03
Wonder if they are waiting for Nov 5th as tribute to the movie "V"? ;-)
1 18hockey 2016-11-03
https://redd.it/5b08cy
https://redd.it/5azc9k
1 AutoModerator 2016-11-03
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
64 [deleted] 2016-11-03
Why do these supposed insiders always post to 4chan? Why post at all? It seems reckless, assuming they're legit.
56 gabe_athouse69 2016-11-03
99% of them are fake. The only reason you would do it there is for anonymity.
11 [deleted] 2016-11-03
But why post at all if they are real?
20 gabe_athouse69 2016-11-03
It's kind of like somebody leaking information to wikileaks, only to 4chan instead. They just do it because they may be a good person who stumbled into some shit, and that's the easiest way to get it to anybody in the public while remaining anonymous.
34 WorseThanHipster 2016-11-03
2 Nowin 2016-11-03
Not much different than a redditor posting the leak to reddit, I think.
1 Polybius_is_real 2016-11-03
4chan
anonymity
pick one
23 DEEP_SEA_MAX 2016-11-03
Autism
4 TheCatch26 2016-11-03
If you watched the two videos from yesterday, the counter coup is comprised of the intelligence community, Wikileaks, and the American people. There's only certain places they can post, and I'm sure Reddit isn't one of them.
5 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
2 TheCatch26 2016-11-03
The two in the second stickied post of this sub. Please stay informed. This is potentially the biggest moment of American history aside from the first revolution. Edit: upvote for asking a legitimate question
4 iliveinabathtub 2016-11-03
Because Art Bell is no longer on the air.
46 Attackdog1776 2016-11-03
I am so sick of these HUGE leaks. They never happen! Like that stupid video that came out yesterday that everyone said would bring down Clinton.
6 haxvious 2016-11-03
curious, which video?
5 Fr_FintanStack 2016-11-03
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1L1gNUPbTw
3 Attackdog1776 2016-11-03
Yes. The one that was posted below. It was absolutely nothing.
2 danibobanny 2016-11-03
Yes very disappointed
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
0 Attackdog1776 2016-11-03
It's going to be so hard to spread the word to my Hillary drones since it will involve kids and will probably be taken down on FB
1 PusherofCarts 2016-11-03
That's what happens when a gang of non-LEO/non-lawyers who are hellbent on a conclusion they want to reach are the arbiters of information.
HRC will be elected. She will not go to jail.
38 FosterPapa 2016-11-03
My advice for everyone on here is not to anticipate the leak but to come up with a plan. Go grocery shopping now if your fridge is empty. Most Americans do not have the benefit to do so right now. Most Americans will be in shock. As will the world. Next 5-8 hours are vital.
89 EndgameArchitecture 2016-11-03
Regardless of what's leaked.... Nothing will happen. No one will be held accountable. You cannot unseat power at this level. Nixon was the last, and lessons were learned.
73 beericane 2016-11-03
If there are photos of political figures abusing children, you better believe those folk's lives will be over.
I've always wondered what it would take to get riots in the street but pardoning a rich pedophile politician might very well do it.
Even murderers and rapists don't condone that shit.
29 Afrobean 2016-11-03
Yeah, there's no way these crooks don't get assassinated if the president pardons them for example after the whole world has seen them raping children. If this comes to pass, anyone directly implicated is fucked one way or the other.
5 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
More like the entirety of our governmental system is about to be turned on its head. Thiel and Palantir will make sure of that.
2 HempCO719 2016-11-03
Who?
10 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/95441792
If you can stand navigating 4 chan, this is another good read by an anon. Take it with a grain of salt make your own deductions.
1 cerhio 2016-11-03
Are you dense? The UK had a huge problem with pedophilia at high levels of government and nobody gave a shit. I'm sure you'd love this all to happen but the truth of the matter is you're getting worked up over some kid on /pol trolling the alt right.
3 mygfishot 2016-11-03
What kind of weak ass concern trolling is this?
I expected better... Gtfo
2 cerhio 2016-11-03
Wow and I thought the alt left was ridiculous for making up their own terms! You're just as bad as those feminists making up mansplaining.
11 SchlangeHatRecht 2016-11-03
If this is as they imply, then there will certainly be repercussions. At the extreme would be a citizen revolt, but I doubt it would come to that. Who in the military/police would fight to defend child molestors?
5 cryoshon 2016-11-03
child abuse gets people lynched, sometimes.
not ousted, not brought before courts-- lynched.
2 wile_e_chicken 2016-11-03
Loretta Lynched?
2 fayettechilling 2016-11-03
I think the preponderance of evidence says Nixon was set up by the CIA. Lessons are learned by puppets only when they challenge the puppet-masters.
1 lite951 2016-11-03
Let me get this straight. You are predicting that nothing will happen. The same nothing that would happen if there was no conspiracy...
1 rainbowdragon22 2016-11-03
Not the time for cynicism, history has lead up to this point, taking down the establishment was not possible then, not without the internet, it's happening now because now is the only time it could happen, now is when the time is finally ripe! "NOTHING CAN RESIST AN IDEA WHO'S TIME HAS COME" -Victor Hugo
0 netskink 2016-11-03
Exactly. I'm glad you pointed that out. Poor kid above grew up watching the power rangers and has softened his brain.
1 CommanderRen 2016-11-03
Good to see you went to English class.
24 yekungfu 2016-11-03
chill out mate, hahahaha
14 cerhio 2016-11-03
It's been 5 hours since your post. How's the shock, America? /S
6 red-line 2016-11-03
I HAVE TOO MUCH BREAD AND MILK BECAUSE I LISTENED TO REDDIT
1 Harambe_Remembers 2016-11-03
About as monumental as the change our dear Obama brought to the government.
8 cutol 2016-11-03
If this were real thr shock would be that of a nuclear strike or dirty bomb or some shit, as diversion. Then blame Russia.
Dunno, seems too juicy to be true. I hope for the worst.
1 ajstipcak 2016-11-03
Juicy?
Phrasing....
1 cerhio 2016-11-03
I think you've been playing too much CoD. International relations are way more boring than that.
6 LBJSmellsNice 2016-11-03
Aight cool 3 more hours until the apocalypse then?
2 Alinzko 2016-11-03
Where's Carl?
3 MessisTaxAccountant 2016-11-03
Womp womp
1 JayneT70 2016-11-03
We get a lot of snow in my area, always have extra supplies on hand. There have been winters where I've been home bound for days. I feel to many people take for granted modern living.
1 rebuilt11 2016-11-03
I stocked up last week. I'm not a crazy prepped or anything but I really believe shit is about to pop off.
8 Middleman79 2016-11-03
I bought extra cat food and I live in Spain..
1 egamakadedidiut 2016-11-03
It will. I assure you I will not be alive to see Clinton take the oath of office one way or another.
1 MaigoULTD 2016-11-03
I just left the grocery store when I read this comment. I'm going back in for more
1 OneThinDime 2016-11-03
So we should buy bread and milk? Should I horde some gasoline and rifle ammo?
1 LBJSmellsNice 2016-11-03
Are you going to continue to baselessly fear monger just like this in the future or was this a one time thing?
-1 RICH_HOMIE_XORBAX 2016-11-03
To add to this: If you have pets, make sure to get food and supplies for them, too. Fill up the car's gas tank and double-check your "go bag". Review the plans you've made and update them if necessary.
Finally, try not to succumb to fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Trust your skills, trust your plans, and trust your intuition in adjusting them on the fly. The grace of the Gods be with you all in these troubling times. Good hunting. The North remembers.
33 bisjac 2016-11-03
crosses fingers aliens aliens aliens aliens
23 tedsmitts 2016-11-03
Hillary/Alien sex tapes
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[removed]
1 SovereignMan 2016-11-03
Rule 10. Removed. Final warning.
31 Veneox 2016-11-03
Hopefully this is real
13 trixstar3 2016-11-03
Why would you hope this to be true. Ungodly amounts of minors being sexually abused and covered up for god knows how long? I pray this isn't true.
56 melkor42 2016-11-03
I don't think he was saying the he hopes the pedophilia is real, but rather that he hopes the proof is actually coming out so that the guilty can be brought to justice.
25 drakobeats 2016-11-03
Pretty sure he meant for Justice to happen. Like we all want
25 DontTreadOnMe16 2016-11-03
Minors are being illegally trafficked and abused all over the planet, whether you want that to be true or not. Stopping a ring of major players in that dark underground world would be the best thing we could ever hope for.
14 TypeCorrectGetBanned 2016-11-03
I hate to be the one to burst your bubble, but it is happening. Spend just a small about of time looking up Epstein or the scandals in the U.K. It is happening.
What matters now is uncovering the evidence and stopping it.
6 rainbowdragon22 2016-11-03
But we already KNOW this is going on, have for years, and yes it's linked to the vatican, we hope that the Imminent Justice is true, not the suffering, we already KNOW the suffering is there and just want it to stop
1 greggerypeccary 2016-11-03
I believe they were hoping that the documents are real, I wouldn't hope that this is true but if it is we need to expose it.
1 Geralt23 2016-11-03
Most people are already convinced that disgusting inhumane shit like this already happens in elite circles. What the guy meant is he hopes they will truly be exposed and face justice for their acts.
0 fragglemook 2016-11-03
Oh shut your face, you know what he meant.
29 know_comment 2016-11-03
this was clearly written by a 14 year old.
2 krom_bom 2016-11-03
Or a non-native speaker of english. Just saying.
26 zeldaisaprude 2016-11-03
Okay... We've been hearing this shit for months now.
2 clickwhistle 2016-11-03
o_0
26 mcclivo 2016-11-03
Nothing MAJOR is going to happen. The REAL change needed will not come as a result of this or any of these revelations prior to this one.
It's like people think they are cutting off the head of the snake when in reality it's more like going after one or two heads of a damn hydra.
There will still be corporations and private interests in control...greed...corruption..none of that will go away with a few "key names" in the hot seat.
"The revolution will not be televised"
24 filmfiend999 2016-11-03
What an outrageously speculative headline.
TOMORROW POSSIBLY THERE WILL BE MORE CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE ABOUT A MASSIVELY VAGUE COVERUP
C'mon man.
22 SinisterParad0x 2016-11-03
Link to thread? Thanks
24 skiboarder6730 2016-11-03
sorry, link
6 SinisterParad0x 2016-11-03
Thanks again
6 ElectricYellowMouse 2016-11-03
Probably a good idea to link it in the original post as well
1 Geralt23 2016-11-03
So the thread ended just after the OP said all the evidence and documents were being uploaded. What happened after?
19 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
9 zippityd0dah 2016-11-03
..5. People take to the internet to rage...and then the cycle continues in 4 years.
1 catsfive 2016-11-03
*8 years
0 dehehn 2016-11-03
17 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
11 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
I saw this too. But you think if it dropped at 4 AM we'd know something by now.
2 Middleman79 2016-11-03
not if it's coming from new Zealand......
0 cerhio 2016-11-03
Oh shit someone on 4chan made something up? Wow that's never happened before lol
17 cerhio 2016-11-03
Is everyone forgetting that Anonymous is a very loosely linked organization? I mean literally anyone can say they are with them so I'd take all of this with a huge grain of salt. In fact I'm Anonymous and I disavow the statement on /pol.
16 Drunken_Pink_Rhino 2016-11-03
I feel that both Hilary and Trump supporters on Reddit... are quite possibly... the most insane people alive. More so than a meth head at a Juggalo gathering where it's raining PCP and Angel Dust.
14 MuchoMaas49 2016-11-03
PCP is Angel dust.
14 pcpgivesmewings 2016-11-03
Can confirm.
5 SchlangeHatRecht 2016-11-03
Legit. Name checks out.
16 RamonaLittle 2016-11-03
I'm calling BS. For one thing, I haven't heard anything (check my profile), although obviously I don't know all of what's going on. For another, in general Anonymous doesn't work well with others. Third, a lot of Anons are angry at Wikileaks because Assange has a history of using the Anonymous name and actions when he thinks it helps him, then shitting all over Anonymous when he thinks that will help him. Random recent example.
Who the hell is OP, that s/he has good contacts in all three agencies who are willing to leak information (at the risk of losing their jobs, and according to OP, with concerns for their safety)? And these three people all decided to leak information about the same topic, by coincidence? The only way I could maybe see this happening is if OP is a journalist at a major publication, but then OP wouldn't be posting anything on 4chan, they'd be writing an actual article for their job.
3 krom_bom 2016-11-03
It's also written in a rather awkward syntax with some bizarre spelling errors and wrong word choice type mistakes. To my eye, it seems like it was written by a non-native speaker. I'm not sure what that could mean, but it sort of set off some "bullshit alarms" in my head.
14 chi-hi 2016-11-03
Blue balls.
But hey the cubs won!
10 doughboy192000 2016-11-03
Such a great series.
1 B_Spears_InHerPrime 2016-11-03
Best one in my 24 year lifetime. At least that I can remember fully.
14 troop357 2016-11-03
Not happening. Post the real thing when it happens, this is just useless hype, really.
4 Cristian888 2016-11-03
Posting the actual news in a conspiracy sub wouldn't make sense
14 MALCOLMxTUCKER 2016-11-03
I call bs for a few reasons:
3 terrorhawk_ 2016-11-03
True but I've always been of the mind that Anonymous is controlled opposition.
2 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
Valid argument.
13 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
9 linkdead56k 2016-11-03
Today will be interesting.
0 George_Tenet 2016-11-03
Can u pm me when it comes out?
2 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
7 ronintetsuro 2016-11-03
Here
35 Bestflightever 2016-11-03
"The new leaks being released this week will provide documents in the form of emails, pictures, and videos. Within these will be evidence of Bill Clinton, as well as at least 6 other Government officials, taking part in sexual acts with minors. As well as evidence of Human trafficking that also included minors.
We believe these pictures and videos were taken for the purpose of political manipulation. In order to make sure all participants followed through on a previously agreed agenda.
These documents were given to us by an American Governement official when he had come to learn that this crime had been covered up by Hilary and her staff through methods including bribery and blackmail. He also told us that due to the restricted access to these documents, they would soon know he was the one who released them to us.
We tried to make arrangements for him to exit the country safely, but he was killed before those arrangements could be carried out. We are still not sure if this is because they became aware of the leak, or if they were scared that he may in the future. In either case, his identity will be made public in this next set of leaks so that he can be honored for the hero that he was.
We will not only be releasing these documents, but we have multiple members of the FBI, CIA, and NYPD who will be publically verifying their authenticity once their safety is assured.
This hack has not come from Russia or anyone else they may try to blame this on. This is a leak from Americas own Government Officials who fear for their safety had the opposed them directly due to reasons that will be made clear soon.
We thank you for your patience, as well as your determination and assistance in helping us expose the corruption that has infested our own government. Democracy will be restored to America.
Remember remember the 5th of November."
29 King0fThoseWhoKnow 2016-11-03
Cringe. But anyways, this sounds nice, but I've been let down too many times, so I'll just assume nothing is coming out, in that case anything coming out will be a positive surprise I guess
19 Lulzorr 2016-11-03
I'm ready for disappointment. This is another larper almost gauranteed.
4chan's OP had this to say:
http://i.imgur.com/4LZJlMB.png
... nearly five hours ago
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/95833740#p95846464
4 l2k9g3v 2016-11-03
Yeah probably not gonna download the pics or videos just to be safe.
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
1 Bitcointechnomage 2016-11-03
more believes with less s's
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
1 Bitcointechnomage 2016-11-03
Yes, that it's someone mashing keys
15 Afrobean 2016-11-03
Do you think the 5th of November is originally from V for Vendetta or something? Learn your history, there's nothing cringe-worthy about making reference to the Gunpowder Plot of 1605.
44 King0fThoseWhoKnow 2016-11-03
No, just repeating that sentence to seem cool makes me cringe. Personal opinion
16 karlkarlkarl21 2016-11-03
I'm with this guy, it's extreme cringe. Like 673% cringe.
14 dickie_smalls 2016-11-03
it will be damn cool if something legendary happens on the 5th
4 Swindel92 2016-11-03
Yeah I'm with you, cringe as fuck. Cheapened the entire post that preceeded it.
2 George_Tenet 2016-11-03
November 5 or November 3????
4 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
Sounds like it could all start to come out today and finalze with a big finale on the 5th? That's what im hoping for but we'll see stay vigilant
13 bumblebritches57 2016-11-03
Here's the archive
http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/95833740
and incase THAT site goes down, here's archive.org's version: https://web.archive.org/web/20161103091952/http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/95833740
2 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
Thank you for helping me bypass the firewall here.
1 mayan33 2016-11-03
that reddirects to reddit
1 bumblebritches57 2016-11-03
Uh, no it doesn't... Are you at work where they may block it?
13 Ozzyo520 2016-11-03
You people are so gullible it's unbelievable.
I've learned that every title with CAPS can be safely disregarded as nothing but bullshit...
2 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
Man, you really get around, don't you?
2 Ozzyo520 2016-11-03
I am 100% an advocate for facts. You people put your feels before facts and being reasonable.
I mean OP cited 4chan. Amazing.
1 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
He's not "Citing" anyone. He's simply quoting someone who is claiming to be releasing a leak in the near future. Depending on the channel this info is distributed through will determine how legit this is.
3 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-11-03
He's not "Citing" anyone. He's simply quoting someone who is claiming to be releasing a leak in the near future. Depending on the channel this info is distributed through will determine how legit this is.
When you quote someone you're citing them.
1 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=cite+definition&atb=v18&ia=definition
v. To quote as an authority or example. v. To mention or bring forward as support, illustration, or proof: cited several instances of insubordinate behavior. v. To commend officially for meritorious action in military service.
Nice try, tho.
3 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-11-03
Nice try on your end.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/citing?s=t
1. to quote (a passage, book, author, etc.), especially as an authority: He cited the Constitution in his defense. 2. to mention in support, proof, or confirmation; refer to as an example: He cited many instances of abuse of power. 3. to summon officially or authoritatively to appear in court. 4. to call to mind; recall: citing my gratitude to him. 5. Military. to mention (a soldier, unit, etc.) in orders, as for gallantry. 6. to commend, as for outstanding service, hard work, or devotion to duty. 7. to summon or call; rouse to action.
0 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
You're missing the part where OP claimed he was an authority.
2 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-11-03
And you're missing the part where you said the OP was simply quoting someone who is claiming to be releasing a leak in the near future.
[bold emphasis added]
0 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
authority : the power to give orders or make decisions : the power or right to direct or control someone or something : the confident quality of someone who knows a lot about something or who is respected or obeyed by other people
2 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-11-03
See that?
BTW, here is the OP basically citing 4chan:
From 4chan /pol/, posted at 2:09am on Nov 3
See, in college there are these things called essays. When you write these essays and quote someone or material that is not your own, you usually have to cite the source of the information. Now depending on how long the quote is, you actually have to format it a different way. Also, at the end of the essay, you normally include a work cited page or bibliography. So maybe you should google MLA format and start from there?
The guy cited a source. End of discussion.
EDIT: That paragraph should be read with a very condescending and mocking tone.
0 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
Yeah. In otherwords, an expert. http://www.freethesaurus.com/expert One is not an expert on an individual leak because they said they were going to leak it.
I am the ruler of the cosmos. Because I said it, I am the authority of the cosmos. See how that doesn't work?
2 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-11-03
Appeal to authority fallacy. Try again.
In closing, the guy cited his source. End of discussion, man.
1 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority
You said that because an authority thinks something, it must therefore be true.
Yeah, that's a straw man. I can play that game too.
1 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-11-03
He cited his source, bro.
No need to continue.
3 Ozzyo520 2016-11-03
Lol you're arguing over term definitions now. I think the other guy did a fantastic job of making you look like a fool so I guess I get the day off.
1 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
I'm not the one with the vocabulary deficiency.
2 Ozzyo520 2016-11-03
Quick Google search: cite - quote (a passage, book, or author) as evidence for or justification of an argument or statement, especially in a scholarly work.
You're borderline retarded.
1 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
1 Ozzyo520 2016-11-03
Especially but not necessarily. No wonder you're a Trump supporter, you're fucking retarded.
1 Ozzyo520 2016-11-03
Here's the kids definition since it's obvious that's the only thing you'll understand:
"to quote as an example, authority, or proof <He cites several experts in his report."
1 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
OP does not site. Anon cites. Not talking about anon. Talking about op.
2 Ozzyo520 2016-11-03
OP literally identified the source and followed it with a quote. Some serious mental gymnastics on your part but what I'd expect from a Trump supporter.
1 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-11-03
lol.
1 im_buhwheat 2016-11-03
100% for facts yet decides a post is bullshit if the title is in caps.
1 Ozzyo520 2016-11-03
More of a joke but there's something to it. Excellent rebuttal and solid contribution. Thank you.
2 pissflap 2016-11-03
i think these people get a 5 cents per post.
12 HGuy10 2016-11-03
Just when I thought this couldn't get any better.
12 Rumham89 2016-11-03
I knew the Chicago Cubs winning the world series was a sign shit was about to hit the fan.
10 Eat_The_Muffin 2016-11-03
[deleted]
1 hachi-seb 2016-11-03
Remember remember the 5th of November right?
1 atherius_sin 2016-11-03
Pepperidge Farms remembers
10 [deleted] 2016-11-03
All of the people in here doubting the Hillary Clinton international sex trafficking ring are an embarrassment to r/conspiracy. This is something we've been suspecting for years and now that the semblances of actual proof are coming together, you're going to bury your head in the sand and claim it's all ridiculous?
What are you even doing here? Did CTR pay you to get a lobotomy? This is the kind of stuff this sub was built on. We can't trust the government to expose it, so we need to do the work ourselves. No one's going to come out and say "yes I peddle kids to Israel for a profit", so of course it's going to sound ridiculous to anyone outside of this sub.. until you research it and realize there's a lot more to this than you think.
Go to WikiLeaks and search for the word "pizza". Then make a good argument for why the people in this world with the most power sit around and email each other about pizza all day. Tell me how it makes any sense. And you better have a goddamn solid argument.
2 DEEP_SEA_MAX 2016-11-03
Pizza?
3 [deleted] 2016-11-03
Pizza. Search it up in WikiLeaks. They're talking about child porn/sex trafficking. It's codewords
Here's one of the many examples in what is basically an endless list: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5az238/implicated_did_obama_spend_65000_in_tax_payer/
1 AutoModerator 2016-11-03
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 ddaniels02 2016-11-03
yeah this one seems troubling... https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/32795
wtf does that even mean?
3 Disquestrian 2016-11-03
MAP = Minor Attracted Person
CHEESE PIZZA = Child porn
Google child porn lingo
1 lordofthedries 2016-11-03
Might pass on that google search.
1 ddaniels02 2016-11-03
and then watching Biden's creepy ass video just makes one feel sicker.
This 'hard pill to swallow' for the regular americans needs come out sooner than later.
2 [deleted] 2016-11-03
That means semen. Map=semen/DNA. That's the only explanation we've been able to come up with. People don't say weird things like that in emails unless it's code.
1 ddaniels02 2016-11-03
this and the "spirit cooking" phrase. wtf america, sandusky was just the tip of an iceberg. Either fight it or you're compliant! Watch the first Taken movie if you need some inspiration!!
2 [deleted] 2016-11-03
Yeah, I don't care who you're voting for but there's no defending this.
2 ddaniels02 2016-11-03
jesus-f'ng-christ!! whoever defends that needs to be shot in the streets and probably have their entire families wiped out.
Edit: I've become pretty desensitized by crazy demented stuff over the years, but I don't even want to click that link again.
2 [deleted] 2016-11-03
I realize we look down on Alex Jones here but he's covering this extensively on his radio show right now. I recommend checking it out
1 ddaniels02 2016-11-03
good to hear. I don't mind of someone like alex jones mixes his crazy with stuff. at least there's no censoring stuff. The moment there's censorship we lose our opportunities to think critically.
2 [deleted] 2016-11-03
Indeed. I don't necessarily trust Alex Jones but when Fox News is the only organization aside from Drudge and Breitbart that's doing their jobs and reporting on all these Hillary crimes, I gotta give them all the benefit of the doubt
0 HillaryBrokeTheLaw 2016-11-03
Ok I did. There were a 126 results. Out of 42000, that's 0.3% of the emails (and that's 8 years of emails) that have the word pizza in them. There may be a code there, but I think operators like this are a bit more sophisticated than that. Maybe I'm wrong.
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
It's just really hard for me to believe that these millionaires sit around all day sending each other very strangely worded cryptic emails about pizza. Is it nothing? Could be. But it's worth putting thought into.
9 EnviousDan 2016-11-03
How many of these are people going to fall for? What's the count up to now? Every week of this election has been MAJOR LEAKS COMING ELECTION BREAKING ITS HAPPENING
4 Master_Builder 2016-11-03
Why would anyone believe anything from /pol/ Jesus. And op got gold!
8 penispoweruser 2016-11-03
I remember something from a month ago talking about something huge being released on november 4th. This might actually be legit.
8 Im_Justin_Cider 2016-11-03
I hate to say it, but I tell people at work about this... and nobody cares
16 arsene14 2016-11-03
Why would anyone care about an anonymous 4chan post?
1 Im_Justin_Cider 2016-11-03
I told them "word from anonymous is that there is going to be a major leak in the next few days... bigger than anything they've ever leaked before" and the general response was a faint "heh" and then back to work
7 PPKAP 2016-11-03
That's probably because "a major leak in the next few days... bigger than anything they've ever leaked before" has been promised over and over and it's unfounded or some minor crap the majority (but not all of) the time.
3 arsene14 2016-11-03
A lot of people post a lot of stuff on 4chan. I guess we'll see what happens. I'm skeptical in the meantime, but hoping for some fireworks.
2 cerhio 2016-11-03
Maybe because anyone can say they're from Anonymous...
0 Im_Justin_Cider 2016-11-03
Yeah, I'm not trying to justify it or anything, just reporting the response i'm getting from your average joe about this
1 LBJSmellsNice 2016-11-03
I mean I wouldn't really care or believe you. Whatever is leaked is always hyped to no end regardless of what it actually is. It'll be something fairly mild, then you'll just look a bit silly, and then in a year the process will repeat
11 Glass_wall 2016-11-03
They don't believe you.
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
3 theivoryserf 2016-11-03
Or yet more common, "why would I believe some anonymous diarrhoea from an online message board filled with sociopaths"
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
1 theivoryserf 2016-11-03
Anything's possible, I'm yet to hear anything convincing.
1 theivoryserf 2016-11-03
Anything's possible, I'm yet to hear anything convincing.
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
2 theivoryserf 2016-11-03
That's your prerogative, but I don't think intuition alone counts as evidence for these sorts of things
1 theivoryserf 2016-11-03
Or yet more common, "why would I believe some anonymous diarrhoea from an online message board filled with sociopaths"
6 Middleman79 2016-11-03
if a video emerges of Bill Clinton sexually abusing children whilst hillary puts cigarettes out on their backs, they'll notice.
2 CelticJoe 2016-11-03
And if what usually happens - that it turns out to be quite insignificant or nothing at all - they'll snigger and move on. There's nothing wrong with healthy skepticism.
2 Sharkey311 2016-11-03
LOL
8 UnlovedByAl 2016-11-03
Bigfoot....
3 EndgameArchitecture 2016-11-03
Ugh, it's Yeti-American you fucking shitlord..
/s
2 UnlovedByAl 2016-11-03
Listen up. My grandpa was full yeti. So that makes me 1/4 yeti. I am allowed to use such terms like bigfoot and the even more offensive (when said by non yetis) sasquatch. So before you get in my face on reddit in front of everyone telling me what to say, maybe you should get your facts straight!
1 Probatus 2016-11-03
Bigfoot killed JFK. I'm not trying to insult anyone just nice to have a lol now and again.
1 tedsmitts 2016-11-03
Or possibly Bigfeet! Hillary knew all along!
8 CormagMHFU 2016-11-03
are you morons actually retarded?
1 EndgameArchitecture 2016-11-03
Yes. Mostly.
8 ragecry 2016-11-03
If I make a post with two or three caps at the end of the title a moderator removes it instantly. This post is allowed to stay up, get gilded and reach front page. Double standards are lame, just sayin'. No need to go removing this post either, just relax on the rules a bit unless there is an actual problem thank you.
8 austenten 2016-11-03
Starting to feel like this is misinfo, since nothing has been published.
Edit to add, why is this being voted into the stratosphere when the OP has clearly not followed through?
2 dustyceilingfan 2016-11-03
What time was that posted at?
1 austenten 2016-11-03
2:09 am, said all would be posted to wikileaks within the hour. This is bollocks. It's highly unlikely the OP is employed by wikileaks, or is in direct contact with Assange.
That being said, OPs claims and info does corroborate with that Steve fellow who posted the two YouTube video announcements yesterday. (See VS stickied on this thread).
The fact he said "checkmate" makes it seem amateur, but like pre-cognition, I actually sensed weeks ago that someone would say checkmate towards the end of this epic behind the scenes battle.
Maybe Assange is pushing back saying, I'll publish when I'm damn good and ready. It makes zero sense that Wikileaks would publish in congress with some random anon saying checkmate, but that shouldn't completely invalidate what s/he is claiming is coming.
1 austenten 2016-11-03
Sorry, can't edit my last cmnt. That comment was tagged: ...UTt Thu 03 Nov 2016 01:19:10 No.95846464.
The OP on here cited the source thread as 2:09 am.
8 alphex 2016-11-03
Jesus christ... can Wikileaks hire a communications strategist?
I don't even care if its real or not, the way they drag shit out kills me.
7 Middleman79 2016-11-03
just oit of interest, how does the cia, fbi and nypd get hold of anonymous? kind of defies the point of being anonymous doesn't it?
2 IAmNotJoshua 2016-11-03
They call his mother who then shouts his name in the street.
2 Middleman79 2016-11-03
they put a note up in all the kfc's in the world perhaps?
7 Akitoscorpio 2016-11-03
Callin bullshit
I get the election is winding down and the shit thrown hasn't really stuck to the wall. But if /pol/ is your last hope.... then shits not going to end well for yall.
7 Mannix58 2016-11-03
OK, plus Trump is in a similar situation with a minor according to the Huffington Post.. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html
what's with these creeps? Maybe we should call upon the Catholic.......errr umm...nevermind.
The upper powers need to go away...far, far away.
2 Harambe_Remembers 2016-11-03
Ayyyy check out the Biden C-Span footage of him being all gropey and gross. Something very wrong with that guy.
7 Combat_crocs 2016-11-03
Hey, I'm all for locking her up, believe me, I wear my "Hillary for Prison" shirt with pride.
I just see two holes in this:
So we've been teased this "October Surprise" since the end of summer, and now due to whatever was found on Weiner's computer, we're getting it? Just seems awfully convenient.
Two: why is this shit always released on a Friday? Why not in the middle or beginning of the week, so it at least gains some traction with the MSM, instead of a quick blurb and everyone heads off to enjoy their weekends? By Monday, most people don't give a fuck what happened last week, unless it pertains to West World.
I'm not a shill (check my history) but in the minute it took me to click on this post and read thru the top, it's plain to see where the burden of proof lay.
7 Martaway 2016-11-03
You forgot the "THIS IS NOT A DRILL"/"ITS HAPPENING" in your headline... how am I supposed to know if this is a drill or if in fact this is truly happening?
7 98427384950 2016-11-03
I think the guy was a fake. I have the post bookmarked and he never answered any questions like he said he would, then towards the end of the post he says there was a "change of plans" and they were releasing everything within the hour. 12 hours later and there's still nothing...
6 faeried 2016-11-03
I'll believe it when I see it
6 mhazz84 2016-11-03
Since when does this sub take anything with a grain of salt?
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
Apparently now, bc most comments are pretty skeptical.
6 SolidThoriumPyroshar 2016-11-03
Remember when the top post on this sub was an anonymously /pol/ person saying Bill was going to definitely be publicly revealed to have cancer? Why do you people even bother repeating what random trolls on 4chan say?
4 Master_Builder 2016-11-03
Because people give you Reddit gold.
2 Freqwaves 2016-11-03
Because random trolls on 4chan are about as believable as the better known trolls at Fox, CNN, or the New York Times, which is not very, yet somehow some people believe that lot too.
1 SolidThoriumPyroshar 2016-11-03
You mean they tell you what you want to hear more often.
0 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-11-03
People have itchy ears. And that FBIanon guy? SMH...I don't buy any of his claims.
6 littlejohnnyjewel 2016-11-03
It's almost 12 hours later, and...nothing.
OP must have committed suicide...
6 WadeWilsonforPope 2016-11-03
Hate to be that guy but Ill believe it when I see it.
6 climber514d 2016-11-03
Cheese pizza... lots and lots of cheese pizza.
6 JumboReverseShrimp 2016-11-03
If they finally leak human trafficking shit, that will be a game changer. The term conspiracy theorist will become useless because if they will traffic children, what wouldn't they do?
3 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-11-03
Proof of 9/11 being an inside job or proof of white slavery and pedophilia. Those are the only things capable of getting the ball rolling.
5 AceGames2Much 2016-11-03
https://www.reddit.com/r/Operation_Berenstain/
0 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
What's this?
2 _C0bb_ 2016-11-03
Do you even Mr Robot?
0 Middleman79 2016-11-03
summon the magic morons! (autists)
5 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-03
I wonder which murder they are talking about? Could assange be dead?
7 Afrobean 2016-11-03
Check out the link to the 4chan thread, there's speculation that it could be a general who allegedly committed suicide a few months back. Maybe it could also be the Clinton Foundation person who was seeking asylum in another country but has apparently gone missing?
9 SeepingMoisture 2016-11-03
Eric Braverman, former CF chair?
Yeah that was completely fabricated by Sorcha Faal.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2147.htm
1 Snakebrain5555 2016-11-03
What's the story with that sorcha faal site?
2 SeepingMoisture 2016-11-03
It's a conspiracy site that most conspiracy believers find less than credible. Most of the stories cite "kremlin insiders" or something equally nebulous.
3 AssNasty 2016-11-03
No. Probably the 2 star general. Maybe?
5 little726 2016-11-03
She could gas 6 million jews and still walk free.
2 Renato1092 2016-11-03
Nah, not the jews. She could gas 6 mil of any other race/ethnic and walk free tho.
5 Phinigma 2016-11-03
Sadly, /pol/ has been caught up on this pedophilia topic and other more obscure theories lately. It has taken the focus off of the more believable, (and boring), corruption topics and led them down a seemingly endless rabbit hole.
I think this, just like many before it, will lead nowhere. Is it a troll or a concerted disinformation effort? Who knows.
I do know that the simplest answer is usually correct. We should focus on the simpler motives to explain the corruption like greed and the lust for power and spend less time trying to find secret pedophile rings.
Just my 2¢.
2 SchlangeHatRecht 2016-11-03
I worry this might be the case as well. Why all the mysterious: "We have a video that we will release that will destroy Clinton..."
OK, then destroy away. Nothing happens.
It may be a distractor to keep folk off the WL documents as you suggest.
1 SchlangeHatRecht 2016-11-03
I worry this might be the case as well. Why all the mysterious: "We have a video that we will release that will destroy Clinton..."
OK, then destroy away. Nothing happens.
It may be a distractor to keep folk off the WL documents as you suggest.
5 ubuntufig 2016-11-03
how gullible are you
5 HoundDogs 2016-11-03
I feel like all of these anonymous promises are almost designed to create complacency.
5 KendleC 2016-11-03
This could be the reason they were practicing shutting down the internet last week. The Economist (a CFR elitist rag) reinforced the threat of an impending take down, Genl. Petraeus also saying there's going to be a lot more of this in the future. This is all fluffing to get you to think Russia or whatever. The screechiest is, of course, Clinton.
Scenario: 911 list of the complicit with the Neocons and War Machine for the false flag. Mass arrests and show trials then executions. So, fear of exposure, disclosure. One of the main planners, scared shitless, looking for immunity, may blow the whistle on the whole cabal. The biggest danger, nukes fly as a last attempt at distraction.
5 JebBaker 2016-11-03
4chan autists have been making "predictions" based on nothing for a decade.
I get a chuckle whenever I think about the Romney bets.
5 TouchMeHerePls 2016-11-03
IMHO the biggest cover up in USA history is the 911 attacks orchestrated by Mossad with support of dual citizenship American zionist politicians and the like.
They needed to do this to drag us deeper into THEIR wars for THEIR benefit, using our tax dollars and young soldiers' lives.
I wouldn't count on it though. They will come out and say it was a bunch of ignorant Muslims...
2 Carlos_Dangers_wang 2016-11-03
Since so many of these people are tied to that-- we can hope it blows the lid off of zionist control also. In my wildest dreams, I never thought it would really happen. I'm hopeful it's true so we can do something about it.
2 TouchMeHerePls 2016-11-03
Sadly, it likely won't.
Because, that would be antisemitic amiright?
2 Carlos_Dangers_wang 2016-11-03
What I tell myself all the time when I get down is-- all things come to an end. Israel has overstepped, and it will soon be toppled, one way or another. There was open speculation of revolution there only weeks ago. It's time they oust the nazi zionists.
4 thisMFER 2016-11-03
Too meny people crying wolf these days . I'll beleave it when i see it .
4 lloydbennett1 2016-11-03
Why tell us all this instead of just releasing the shit?
4 theivoryserf 2016-11-03
The FBI contacted me especially to say that our Top Secret info would land Hitlary in jail!!! They also said that the best way to break the news would be an anonymous post on a board for the socially maligned and maladjusted!!! Also my uncle works for Nintendo!!!
4 BatemansVideoRentals 2016-11-03
4 McDudeston 2016-11-03
I call bullshit
4 prkrrlz 2016-11-03
Hurry up and release them before she gets into office!
4 mdof1337 2016-11-03
Remember "Concern Trolling"
4 worktheshoot 2016-11-03
FBI anon said podesta would resign tomorrow. Maybe this is the reason? He specifically said Friday. We will see
4 The_Nightmoose 2016-11-03
"largest coverup" should be about aliens, not Hillary lol. And if they want to expose and take down Hillary, can they please do the same for Trump too? :P
4 Varrick2016 2016-11-03
Motherfucker this is like True Detective Season 1 shit right here.
4 smokeyrobot 2016-11-03
I just want to add that two recent events in the media have given the July FBI Anon some more credibility.
The FBI Records account is being internally investigated because of the tweets it sent out this past weekend. FBI anon claimed there was an internal schism inside the FBI.
The UK Parliament juat said that they make the last call on Brexit irregardless of voter decision. FBI anon said Brexit wasn't going to happen when it eventually came time.
4 new_usernaem 2016-11-03
lol people actually believe that someone on 4chan would get a leak of this magnitude that was real. they would go to a real journalistic organization like snowden first.
3 pro_spiracy 2016-11-03
I think the post meant "pertaining" rather than "retaining", or perhaps they used the wrong word on purpose?
5 skiboarder6730 2016-11-03
The text I copied above was a direct quote, I think the use of 'retaining' is a mistake. Retaining could mean 'holding back' or 'lawyering up,' neither of which really makes sense here
3 SeepingMoisture 2016-11-03
Remindme! 2 days
1 RemindMeBot 2016-11-03
I will be messaging you on 2016-11-05 13:04:33 UTC to remind you of this link.
15 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.
3 HugePurpleNipples 2016-11-03
With the way this election is going I think we could find a picture of Bill with his dick in a 13 y/o while Hillary holds her down and I don't think it would change a thing.
We're getting overlord Clinton.
3 PUTINsTiTs 2016-11-03
Believe it when I see it
3 JoBloggs1 2016-11-03
Wikileaks can't/won't publish child porn. I'm calling BS on this one.
3 c3vin 2016-11-03
So what? So what if the FBI have the smoking of all guns if the DoJ will not prosecute?
Am I understanding correctly that even if the FBI recommends prosecution, Loretta Lynch and the Dept of Justice can still block?
Also, why the eff would Comey incriminate himself, when he is so closely tied to the CF?
I believe there is evidence, I even a blind man with google could see the corruption.
But who will prosecute?
3 IShavedMyNutsForThis 2016-11-03
I'll believe it when I see it, which means it'll either be overblown or they literally won't release anything.
All these leaks are bullshit. If anyone ever had any kind of "smoking gun" on either side, they wouldn't be waiting until a couple days before the election when it'll do almost nothing. Just more distractions and people trying to get their rocks off by having "the scoop".
3 Warphead 2016-11-03
Starting to understand why it's so important to surveil, control and imprison the citizens.
3 CoxyMcChunk 2016-11-03
Lol, remember when the_don thought wikileaks was gonna release something big? That was great
3 NSAdragnet 2016-11-03
Don't trust the CIA guy.
3 juloxx 2016-11-03
If it aint about UFO's i dont want it
2 arithehurricane 2016-11-03
Don't you think that a rogue govt affects you way more than alien lifeforms?
1 juloxx 2016-11-03
i ccant say till we know ;)
3 rivermandan 2016-11-03
OP will surely deliver
3 Kicker_Doomstah 2016-11-03
Goddamn sick psychos are rulling the world. My God...
3 TheBitterBuffalo 2016-11-03
I know everyone is hating on the "this one's it!" people, but seriously guys, this one is real, if the leaks happen, there will be a total split in the gov, so many people would have to be arrested they would need to make a prison just for them.
3 littlejohnnyjewel 2016-11-03
Hyping your leak before you leak it is a big red flag...if it's THAT good, you won't need to hype it.
1 TheBitterBuffalo 2016-11-03
That is a good point.. but most of these leaks has been hyped it seems.
2 eaglejm 2016-11-03
Yeah this basically is straight out of the Marvel movies a real life Hydra.
1 TheBitterBuffalo 2016-11-03
Cut off the head
3 Marsof29 2016-11-03
Imho the Snowden case was the 'largest coverup in American History' and look what happened after that.... do not get your hopes up amigos
3 cheezypoof85 2016-11-03
If it was released at 4am....where is it? My fingers are crossed it appears.
3 LtPatterson 2016-11-03
ARM YOURSELVES.
3 ElQuackers 2016-11-03
I don't really get us politics at times. You actually want Trump to win? What's the deal with cnn, why so controversial?
3 VancouverSucks 2016-11-03
Youre a little late to the party. Trump is a nationalist and Hillary is a globalist.
3 fitfrank 2016-11-03
WIKILEAKS JUST TWEETED ABOUT FBI-DOJ EMAIL DUMP COMING AT 4PM TODAY!
1 Akitoscorpio 2016-11-03
Yeah pm came and went.
1 Disquestrian 2016-11-03
aaaannnnnddddd there was a dump.
3 Tonker83 2016-11-03
What the fuck happened to this sub?
4 MrDanger 2016-11-03
/r/The_Donald happened to it.
2 atherius_sin 2016-11-03
And CTR followed.
0 Tonker83 2016-11-03
Ah yes, The CTR boogieman. Amazing what 1 million dollars can buy now days. I'd vote for her just on the fact she took over the internet with that tiny amount. That's some fiscal responsibility!
1 atherius_sin 2016-11-03
Lol. Not a supporter of either, but don't bash one bogeyman without bashing the other.
2 Tonker83 2016-11-03
What other boogieman did I bash?
3 qwerty1088 2016-11-03
Since the claim is that this will happen tomorrow, then we will find out pretty quickly if it is BS. Not much point speculating what it is or if it's even real - we'll know soon enough.
3 i_says_2_mabel 2016-11-03
Lol the desperation in this sub is palpable.
3 iversonwings 2016-11-03
This is turning out to be a spoiler for the new season of House of Cards. I wonder how Frank Underwood would handle this...
3 whatsreallygoingon 2016-11-03
Will our second civil war also be about slavery?
3 duhbiap 2016-11-03
I too want justice for being subjected to the lies. However let's not forget about potential economic impacts of a massive haul which would indict the fraudsters and their business partners. The US economy would be brought down and chaos would ensue. While that sounds sexy and all....I don't have a load of MREs to feed my family with nor do I have a loaded arsenal to help protect me from the apocalypse.
Anything near the extent of what is being mentioned here would be the end of Rome.
2 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-11-03
However let's not forget about potential economic impacts of a massive haul which would indict the fraudsters and their business partners. The US economy would be brought down and chaos would ensue.
Logic and reason. We have a winner on our hands!
1 Smoothtank 2016-11-03
Fuck the impacts. We should not compromise with political corruption. We should not negotiate or think about the harm it would cause to bring harmbringers to justice with merciless punctuation.
I'm willing to weather any fallout to see them hanging.
3 werkshop1313 2016-11-03
So it's tomorrow... Are we calling bullshit?
2 Capn_Cornflake 2016-11-03
If there's not an edit before 2:30EST we call bullshit.
1 werkshop1313 2016-11-03
<looks around>
2 Sataz 2016-11-03
Screenshots?
2 LeftousCrusader 2016-11-03
ignore any and all leaks that do not come from Democracy Now, the intercept or WikiLeaks. The shenanigans are strong.
2 jumpingjehosophat 2016-11-03
What about this I checked wikileaks and nothing was there but the podesta emails... Is this guy a troll?
2 InvertedForest 2016-11-03
Y'all are so full of shit.
2 Vurondotron 2016-11-03
I stopped reading the post when I saw this..
2 appalachia_1981 2016-11-03
I'll believe it when I see it. There have been a lot of these instances of "the big one" coming that did not come to fruition.
2 I_Fuck_Milk 2016-11-03
I'll be happy if it leads to the arrests of all 3 Clintons (including Chelsea), Obama, Lynch, Holder, and Comey. Mills, Samuelson, and Abedin would be great too.
2 wetsneakers 2016-11-03
You're quoting 4chan as a reliable source? <smh>
2 dabulls113 2016-11-03
Don't believe it. Government agencies are not going to work to release information that will lead to indictments...
2 austenten 2016-11-03
If you have the quote, why not the source? You probably made dozens of people have to search for this, hopefully they didn't scroll through.
Is this the thread you're referencing?
2 Redditors_DontShower 2016-11-03
lmfao
I wish this were true, but if you believe a thing a random 4channer says you're a little more than a conspiracy nut
bet he claims, once this happens, that the FBI was silenced by team Clinton and had their lives/family lives threatened, and people will eat that bullshit up
2 BARchitecture 2016-11-03
This will never happen
2 illinoises 2016-11-03
Please tell me how to feel.
Asking for a friend.
Thanks in advance, guys.
2 Chuck_Testas_Hat 2016-11-03
So, Reddit will be down tomorrow?
2 Gorkildeathgod 2016-11-03
oh my god I can't fucking wait!!! Let her rip!
2 agent0fCha0s 2016-11-03
Fuck I wish this were true
2 RevWaldo 2016-11-03
Wikileaks and Anonymous working together
MASS HYSTERIA!
2 Freqwaves 2016-11-03
Que the Ron Paul gif
2 hustl3tree5 2016-11-03
I kinda want to it to happen so we can witness history.
2 Freqwaves 2016-11-03
Yes. Because 4chan is where to go for news.
2 Vurondotron 2016-11-03
I'm still waiting for leak docs that contain information that our Government has been hiding the existence of Alien life. But let me put on my tinfoil hat. I'm ready! Or that John F. Kennedy was killed by our government. Or that Bigfoot was a mistake from the US Army. See that will be the biggest cover-up in America. Not this.
2 rrhinehart21 2016-11-03
Remindme! 12 hours
1 im_joe 2016-11-03
RemindMe! 12 hours
1 rrhinehart21 2016-11-03
Remindme! 12 hours
2 jeromyedge 2016-11-03
RemindMe!
2 zer05tar 2016-11-03
Never underestimate the apathy of the American people.
The people who care about this aren't voting for her anyhow, and the other half don't want to hear anything negative about their Queen.
2 arrestofjudgment 2016-11-03
/pol/ has done some good work. there's a reason FBIAnon went to them.
2 Pedobear831 2016-11-03
Aliens?
2 Krischan76 2016-11-03
Give material back to Mother Russia, filthy western spies!
2 cb75 2016-11-03
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/794257681901096960
2 glass_daggers 2016-11-03
R/gullibleasfuck
Why is it you guys never recalibrate your skepticism, despite the fact that Everytime stuff like this comes up it turns out to be nothing, or very little?
2 bradenalexander 2016-11-03
I am getting pretty bored of these posts.
2 GamerToons 2016-11-03
It's fucking 4chan. Why do any one of you guys even entertain the fact that any 4hcan poster has EVER been legit is beyond me.
I love conspiracies too, but c'mon guys... get out of your basements and fucking smell the coffee and realize that anon's are bullshitter trolls ALL of the time.
1 victor47 2016-11-03
well there was the fappening....
1 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
It said all documents have been leaked is this true?!?!?!
1 Birdinhandandbush 2016-11-03
How do I subscribe to this mailing list?
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
1 IntellisaurDinoAlien 2016-11-03
RemindMe! 24 hours
Now you can click the link.
1 Wolfwoman1210 2016-11-03
I personally suspect this is bs, OR Wikileaks has been compromised as suspected & then this could be a set up to charge a whole lot of conspiracy theorists & Trump supporters for viewing child porn...
1 cryoshon 2016-11-03
i'll just hold my breath... and hope.
1 monkeyfudgehair 2016-11-03
How would this work? The public cannot legally view the type of videos they say they have. They would need to release the videos to law enforcement and announce that they did so publicly. Would that be the best way to go about it?
1 prestor_juan 2016-11-03
Remindme! 2 days
1 Capn_Cornflake 2016-11-03
If the real Anonymous has actually undergone another operation someone's in for a bad time.
1 Rich6494 2016-11-03
Just like pedophile island and Bill Clinton. Unfortunately, unless people are watching Fox News or One America News, they'll probably never hear about it. Thanks for having American's backs main stream media!
1 coursecatalog 2016-11-03
Sure there is. Can't wait to read that. I am tapping my fingers.
1 Totality-Infinity 2016-11-03
Wasn't there supposed to be a huge, devastating leak Nov 1st? I didn't see one.
Correct if I'm wrong.
1 OpusCrocus 2016-11-03
I'm really curious how the CTR henchmen are reacting to this. Will they suddenly see the corruption and feel dirty?
1 pauljs75 2016-11-03
If it happens, it'll be when the paycheck fails to go through. Not sure how much that would affect such whitewashing orgs, as they probably work from advances rather than promises.
1 TheGreatestUsername1 2016-11-03
After all this gets settled, I hope more investigations are conducted on other people who have been known to be shady individuals. Of course it will take as much effort people are contributing currently. I'd like to thank anyone who has been a part of the effort.
1 reini_urban 2016-11-03
The followup was even more worrying: https://is.4chan.org/pol/1478165740840.jpg
... "These documents were given to use by an American Government official when he had come to learn that this crime had been covered up by Hilary and her staff through methods including bribery and blackmail. He also told us that due to the restricted access to these documents, they would soon know that he was the one who released them to us.
We tried to make arrangements for him to exit the country safely, but he was killed before those arrangements could be carried out. We are still not sure if this is because they became aware of the leak, or if they were scared that he may in the future. In either case, his identity will be made public in this next set of leaks so that he can be honored for the hero he was." ...
It was https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/95833807 but deleted since.
2 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
I can't imagine a government official giving evidence from an ongoing investigation to anonymous. They could potentially ruin any chance for a trial by leaking that data.
All said and done, I'll believe it when I see it. Hopefully wikileaks excludes the images and instead has a credible source verify their existence/content.
2 reini_urban 2016-11-03
I can image this, given that Obama killed any investigations into the former government officials immediately after inauguration, and Hillary will very likely stop the investigations into her own criminal allegations also, as she did before via Comey and DOJ. This is not the rosy age of Watergate or Church committee anymore, where you could actually go after government officials, and implement constitutional reforms.
So it needs be done before the elections.
1 JedYorks 2016-11-03
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/95861278/fuck-it-feels-good-to-be-on-the-winning-side#p95867524
Look at the flag
also
2016, believing a Aussie on 4chan
1 man_slave 2016-11-03
Why does this sub keep taking anonymous /pol/ posts seriously?
1 zefy_zef 2016-11-03
I wonder if they will feed information that will later be debunked, and use that to discredit Wikileaks.. Disinfo...
1 NameSanitized 2016-11-03
CNN back in propaganda mode!
1 rkotarek 2016-11-03
I have my doubts considering all the punctuation and grammatical errors in this post.
1 faithle55 2016-11-03
Why trail the leaks? It's not like you have to get people interested beforehand, like with a film or TV trailer. If you have the stuff, leak it. If you don't, then I guess you have to try and fuck with everybody by making it seem like you do.
1 demo101demo 2016-11-03
Braverman
1 bushidomonkofshadow 2016-11-03
I'll believe it when I see it.
1 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
Can we get a link to the /pol/ thread?
1 fitfrank 2016-11-03
and...here...we...go.
1 cisxuzuul 2016-11-03
Thursday is usually the day to expose the next "issue". That way it stays in the news cycle over the weekend before the election
1 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-11-03
There are only two ways to bring any of these people down:
Release proof that 911 was an inside job and they had their hand in it.
Release proof of white trafficking and pedophilia and that they're involved.
Aside from this, you will not put a dent in their plans.
1 ICUMTARANTULAS 2016-11-03
If true, all hell is about to go down.
1 dylandgs 2016-11-03
Yeah sure
1 BlckMrkt 2016-11-03
Lol
1 Of_Course_AHorse 2016-11-03
I wonder if/how this all ties into the "Papa kills babies" kids in the UK. For whatever reason all of this makes me think of those two poor kids.
1 balancedhighs 2016-11-03
Commenting to come back later.
1 jedi_jonai 2016-11-03
Obama will grant them all a presidential pardon
1 TheAnteatr 2016-11-03
I highly doubt it. That would mean all he would be remembered for is pardoning criminals, thus ruining any chance at a legacy.
1 jedi_jonai 2016-11-03
haha yea i doubt it too, mostly a joke. I met a flat earther the other weekend that sternly believes this election will fall through somehow and Obama will stay in the presidency. I took down his number in case he's right. Also was joking with him: if this election falls through and Obama stays in power, then I'll believe the earth is flat lol
1 KetchupGuy1 2016-11-03
Oh god
1 voxnex 2016-11-03
They've been threatening this for weeks now. I'll wait.
1 realtsuke 2016-11-03
is this from the hacker group anonymous?
1 Mcfattius 2016-11-03
I sure hope so... packing bags to move to Canada now
2 Vurondotron 2016-11-03
Have fun living in a society filled with social justice warriors and such. If you think moving the Canada will save you....Buddy you are sadly mistaking.
1 Mcfattius 2016-11-03
I just want to have quick access to poutine, loonies and toonies eh.
1 treehorn_thug 2016-11-03
hoser
1 Vurondotron 2016-11-03
Canadian Bacon?
1 bloodguard 2016-11-03
Anyone else getting a tad bit concerned that the establishment might do something really wacky like fire off a nuke at some unsuspecting country just to divert attention?
1 AGKontis 2016-11-03
SOURCE?!?
1 blakdart 2016-11-03
So perhaps this is why chans have not been shut down yet, in the worse case scenario the ABCs need a place to spill beans while remaining anonymous.
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[removed]
2 SovereignMan 2016-11-03
Rule 1. No bigoted slurs. Removed. 1st warning.
1 Notashillll 2016-11-03
there's something to your theory...
1 SpaceshotX 2016-11-03
I just realized what this is like. This is like in the movie Titanic, where the ship is starting to sink, but not everyone realizes it yet. Hillary and Mooch must be looking around for different trinkets of value they can stuff in their pockets right about now.
1 notCharlie0115 2016-11-03
Only the MSM ever talked about an October surprise. WikiLeaks did not.
1 NahDude_Nah 2016-11-03
Isn't there a post like this every day here?
2 assreaper 2016-11-03
shhhh your ruining it kek
1 TheSenDest 2016-11-03
If released will they be posted on this post or will it become a new one?
1 Disquestrian 2016-11-03
Going to guess new one
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
All the reason to vote for her. We need someone crafty in the White House
2 Carlos_Dangers_wang 2016-11-03
I hope you're joking, because that's some sick shit.
2 [deleted] 2016-11-03
What sick shit. That a bunch of neckbeards think they're the arbitrators of ethics and morality? Give m a break, that's a bunch of malarky.
1 Carlos_Dangers_wang 2016-11-03
You're obviously someone set in your ways. To think you might be wrong is painful to you, so you lash out at the truth. You are obviously refusing to read wikileaks also. Shame on you.
-1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
You know nothing about me, I was vpning in Saudi Arabia to read Wikileaks before your nuts dropped. I know more about Wikileaks than you know about yourself. Step back.
1 Carlos_Dangers_wang 2016-11-03
Suuuuure you do. Tell me more about your importance and level of knowledge, and then explain why you can so blithely say what you said above about Clinton. Nah, never mind.
BTW, your wrong assumptions about who I am are hilariously off the mark. Lash out childish one.
1 Azh1aziam 2016-11-03
I wouldn't get your hopes up..information like that would mean a ton of dead bodies
1 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-11-03
Exactly. Bodies would have started dropping some time ago.
1 usernameson 2016-11-03
But is there time? I was just watching a discussion about how if Comey had restarted this investigation a month earlier, Donald would be ahead, but now there may not be enough time for this info to get out to enough people before election day. It will be the same situation with this other stuff. At best, Clinton will go to jail and we will have President Kaine for 4 years. I don't want that. The Democrats don't deserve the presidency after all this.
7 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-11-03
I can't take you serious. Not after that. None of this has ANYTHING to do with democrat or republican, liberal or conservative, red or blue. NONE. OF. IT.
2 jonnywut 2016-11-03
The actions of the Democrat Presidential nominee, her campaign, the Democratic National Committee leadership, and the current Democrat sitting president have nothing to do with democrat or republican, liberal or conservative, red or blue? They're just ideologies, pure and innocent, incapable of being tainted by the corruption we observe daily? There is nothing about the strong authoritarian streak in the Democrat and even Republican platforms that encourages and enables the type of behavior we find abhorrent?
1 pissysissy 2016-11-03
It's 21:00 and nothing yet.
1 bbiggs32 2016-11-03
Wow! And the info is from /pol/?
Wew lads! Here comes the big drop!
1 sabbo_87 2016-11-03
only god can hope
1 X-25Halo 2016-11-03
So much teasing.
1 MrLewayne 2016-11-03
So where's the 'leak'? ....
1 werkshop1313 2016-11-03
BULLSHIT!
It's tomorrow dumblefuck, why didn't the sky fall?
1 satisfyinghump 2016-11-03
Well its been two days... Anything other then the mole in DOJ that gave Hillary's team (Podesta) a heads up...?
1 redditsucksfatdick52 2016-11-03
looks like bull shit
1 Exec99 2016-11-03
i remember this
1 Exec99 2016-11-03
Was this removed
0 capitan_canaidia 2016-11-03
If you read down the post, '3p+/eUTt' provided some checksums:
Island - cac096c3d6d6badcaacfe976e9dca485ef3cf598053c56ecfa845d5846875569
Archive 1 - 598adcf58a76dcf95s5fasdc5fa98a9d890af089ads75fad5s63f7ds5f099462
33 KasliCatal 2016-11-03
Sorry, but in what timeline is 's' a valid hex character?
8 Afrobean 2016-11-03
That's weird, there are multiple instances of 's' there. Where did this person get these apparent checksums? That one can't possibly be right, can it?
7 cutol 2016-11-03
Random string generator done faltered.
3 brodybearbear 2016-11-03
Looks like the b's in the second were replaced with s's?
0 fqec 2016-11-03
Imagine a world where non-corrupt Bernie Sanders became president after mopping the floor with Trump in the debates....
/r/Cascadia
0 troombone 2016-11-03
This whole shit about human trafficking, pedo rings etc reminds me so much of True Detective season 1.
Which of these fuckers is the Yellow King?
1 ayesee345 2016-11-03
"This thing Marty, the scope of it, it's like one big fucking conspiracy man!"
I believe realistically, much like the show though, nothing will happen bc of this...at least as far as big people being brought to justice..
0 rainbowdragon22 2016-11-03
I feel this I accurate, I have this deep sense of knowing in the core of my bones RIGHT NOW, this will be the most significant week thusfar in all history! !!! The new way is coming."Nothing can stop an idea whose time has come" -Victor Hugo
0 SoCo_cpp 2016-11-03
Clintons did 9/11?
0 SpaceshotX 2016-11-03
Step 1. Get Trump in the WH Step 2. Fire traitors at DOJ (Lynch etc) Step 3. Fire traitors at FBI (Comey etc) Step 4. Fire traitors at IRS Step 5. Round up every co-traitor and get them to trial and then to the electric chair (Huma, Weiner, Holder, Lerner, Earnest, Podesta, etc etc etc.)
LET'S ROLL.
4 dks42 2016-11-03
Step 6: Impeach or otherwise disable The Trump. Step 7: Use compromised VP as puppet to enforce regime change.
1 SpaceshotX 2016-11-03
Fucking guy is going to save our asses. You should be kissing his ass.
1 dks42 2016-11-03
That sounds oddly homoerotic. Are you in love with your god?
2 SchlangeHatRecht 2016-11-03
6: fire all compromised MSM folk and replace them. Require all MSM to sign letters revealing Conflicts of Interest like many inustries require
0 SCAND1UM 2016-11-03
"The stories and information here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
I'm not saying it's false, but it's probably false.
0 Xristen1 2016-11-03
I hope it's about the fraudulent act of 1871 & how it needs to be undone to get rid of this shadow government returning the corporation United States of America Inc. back into a country & we as country as States as Citizens get back to the Constitution,amendments and the Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence. Get rid of admiralty law in military courts & go back to common law, law of the land, natural law & supreme law, Common Law Courts to be presided over by common law judges like Anna Von Reitz. Doing away with all that is unlawful. How we need to quit Big Oil & poisoning our air which contributes to global warming more than cow farts or people & big corporations destroying our natural land water and world for its natural resources when we can go green I could go on and on but I won't.
1 RandoKillrizian 2016-11-03
The 14th amendment also needs to be done away with its hammered dog shit and is the legalese that enslaves us. We also need to recognize the original 13th amendment, that would be a barn burner.
1 Xristen1 2016-11-03
Agreed. Thanks for bringing those up With all the stuff coming out I just don't want any of it to diminish that those facts exist.
0 chaos3eleven 2016-11-03
But when will a trial start and when will anyone go to jail...specifically Hillary or Bill ....will Obama go at all? I'd love that to be part of his legacy...lol
-1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
2 OpusCrocus 2016-11-03
Today is going to be a great day!
1 fitfrank 2016-11-03
i love that video lol
-3 TormundMembersOnly 2016-11-03
ACCOUNT has been suspended?
-1 OneThinDime 2016-11-03
THE DONALD TRAVELED BACK IN TIME TO DELIVER THIS SPICY MAY MAY TO US
-2 [deleted] 2016-11-03
[deleted]
5 NumNumLobster 2016-11-03
be fun if both trump and Clinton were involved in the same conspiracy
5 Vault32 2016-11-03
That's the thing, they are- they're both tied to the Epstein Pedo Plane. If one goes down it should take the other with them, good riddance
3 Glass_wall 2016-11-03
If any of this is true then Trump is the only remaining legally viable candidate being put forward by a major party.
What legitimate reason do you have to cancel an election? Hell, even if Trump was eliminated (though he did nothing wrong) the election must proceed with third party candidates.
The democrats are just a party, if they pick a dud that's their problem. That's why they're allowed to rig their primaries...
1 RRautamaa 2016-11-03
Why would the parties rerun primaries? Their leadership would simply ignore the primaries and appoint new candidates.
1 SchlangeHatRecht 2016-11-03
The dems and Clinton herself knew of legal issues hovering around Clinton. If the public FINALLY figures it out and she is forced to step down, then that is the dems fault, not Trump's or the fault of the US Constitition.
-2 coincrazyy 2016-11-03
They transferred a billion overseas to make sure they don't live like peasants when evading USA law enforcement
https://www.mgtow.com/forums/topic/hillary-transfers-1-8-billion-from-the-clinton-foundation-to-qatar/
2 PusherofCarts 2016-11-03
lol I'm not sure if you're trying to be funny, but you cited your proposition with a link that says it's bullshit.
-3 aastle 2016-11-03
How can anyone take anything seriously when they read a post on /r/conspiracy? At least in the United States, a conspiracy suggests a wild, unsubstantiated rumor. If I wanted to post about a political conspiracy it would be on /r/politics, not this front for /r/The_Donald .
4 DerpsterIV 2016-11-03
Atleast for now, r/Conspiracy is not radical. It's the perfect amount of cynicality (cynical?) needed for a political sub. r/Politics is run by CTR shills and you aren't getting any reasonable fair arguments between the two.
1 record_time 2016-11-03
*cynicism
2 SchlangeHatRecht 2016-11-03
You could only post an anti-Trump conspiracy there, and it would be eaten up as absolute truth.
-18 SandyHoaxParent 2016-11-03
Sandy hoax truth
9 Drunken_Pink_Rhino 2016-11-03
You are either a half-assed troll, or quite possibly the most retarded person in this sub.
-1 SandyHoaxParent 2016-11-03
According to your recent post history you think lots of people are retarded... In the last 6 posts alone you have called 3 groups of people retarded.
http://imgur.com/tRvbsbc
I think this issue roots from some deep seeded childhood issues that have manifested themselves into your narcissistic traits.
It Ok that you are special bro.. We all know you are an amazing and unique special snowflake.
You made me laugh today.. Now would you like to try again?
2 Drunken_Pink_Rhino 2016-11-03
No. You got me. You got The Tater!
588 natetheproducer 2016-11-03
If this actually happened I think the world would stop for a few days.
34 Afrobean 2016-11-03
It's just too bad that if this comes to pass, CNN will say "Wikileaks hosts child porn from Russia" and "Assange confirmed pedophile because Wikileaks distributed child porn".... Without saying why they would distribute such a thing.
10 SafetyDaily101 2016-11-03
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/95441792
If you can stand navigating 4 chan, this is another good read by an anon. Take it with a grain of salt make your own deductions.
55 [deleted] 2016-11-03
If we possess that video will we be in possession of child porn?
2 _C0bb_ 2016-11-03
Do you even Mr Robot?
16 rabbits_dig_deep 2016-11-03
Is this a quote from the original post on 4chan? Got a link to that post?
26 LeftousCrusader 2016-11-03
Ignore any and all leaks that do not come from Democracy Now, the intercept or WikiLeaks. The shenanigans are strong.
55 GreatSince86 2016-11-03
The thing is, it wont. The evidence they have on the laptop regarding this type of stuff is most likely Anthony Weiner's. Since he's Huma's husband ad so closely tied to Hillary it looks bad. But if they don't release it they're basically hurting the victims. So it's a rough spot. But this narrative being pushed by others is absurd. Everyone is anonymous with an anonymous source. If you can't come forward with this type of evidence then you're full of bullshit.
0 Really_Elvis 2016-11-03
Not gonna happen before the election.
5 Nixplosion 2016-11-03
If wikileaks were smart they would send the photos to police/FBI etc with an explanation of what/why.
100 leocusmus 2016-11-03
Pfft, I only listen to CNN, cause that's what they said, I don't want to go to jail!
2 Legalise_Gay_Weed 2016-11-03
I hate it when people, like you, speak with such certainty about something when you can't know for sure. Not only that, but you provide zero proof to back up your claim.
1 TBomberman 2016-11-03
fyi, it was supposed to be video evidence released too
1 [deleted] 2016-11-03
Erection Insurrection
1 modalert 2016-11-03
I'd wear that a badge of honor in this case.
9 zippityd0dah 2016-11-03
..5. People take to the internet to rage...and then the cycle continues in 4 years.
121 Orvil_Pym 2016-11-03
We already have sufficient evidence that both under Bush and under Obama (with HRC as secretary of state) the US government intentionally lied to have pretexts to incite or prolong and intensify civil wars in the middle east, from Iraq to Syria to Libya. These wars cost hundreds of thousands if not millions of lives, including thousands of children's lives. The results of these wars are the breaking up of families and migration of millions, including hundreds of thousands of children, many of which are being exploited now as child sex labour, either because they are without guardians or a state, or because they have to earn money to help pay for the escape of their families from death and starvation.
All of that is well known, well documented, and above serious doubt. Nobody went to prison. Nobody even lost a job or a pension.
Even if these new allegations were 100% true, how would a few more abused children significantly add to this list of crimes? How would that lead to any arrests all of a sudden? (And, frankly, how hypocritical would that be?)
0 amiatthetop 2016-11-03
Except Bill Clinton isn't running for President.
2 HTSMetal 2016-11-03
It surely will...but many have paid that price before throughout history fighting for true freedom.
I am no better, or more valuable than those lives were, and they made the ultimate sacrifice so that their families and children could live with hope. I've been hoping and waiting for 10 years since I first "woke up" for the powers that be to be brought to justice, and I cannot imagine anything greater coming to pass in my lifetime.
Bring it on.
6 jakemasterj 2016-11-03
1 million years gulag for you
7 Mswizzle23 2016-11-03
Even if it did, how would you know what was completely made up and what's real? That's the issue with any kind of leak like this, it instantly lacks any credibility if it's coming from some other foreign agency. It's clearly targeted which means it's an attack directed at the Clinton campaign. There's all this shit on Clinton, but not one single mention of Trump in any of these leaks people do? Already makes me suspicious to begin with. How many of these turn out to be completely false rumors altogether? How many giant leaks are we told are gonna happen? I remember on Facebook someone said Putin was gonna present undeniable evidence that would rock the nation the US was responsible for 9/11, whatever happened to that? Like 95% of everything from unreputable sources, it was bullshit, it always was.
And actually this has happened before so the idea of a pedo ring isn't unrealistic, it's just the target, the timing and the clear agenda someone has in stirring the pot up. I can't remember the guys name, he was either a state or federal politician but he ran a pedophile ring and eventually got caught so it's not impossible, but...is anyone gonna say with a straight face there are emails from government accounts sharing pictures videos and emails of this shit... So convenient too, right before election day we hear about this. Trumps facing the same accusations but they haven't leaked a god damn thing about him this whole cycle, it's obvious what their agenda is so as far as I'm concerned, it's BS. And you should all be skeptical too until we see some real proof and analysis.
4chan's come a long way from blocking the entrance to the Habbo Hotel pool...
0 Dsnake1 2016-11-03
So he bends easily? Is that what you want in a president? If he can spend his time campaigning for the candidate who represents everything he stood against, why would he be any different in the oval office?
2 mightier_mouse 2016-11-03
I mean, they could censor it heavily.
10 CapnBonescum 2016-11-03
necessary and worthwhile at this point.
14 tedsmitts 2016-11-03
Oh it might be one of those peaceful revolutions you hear so much about
1 a-big-fat-meatball 2016-11-03
Spoiler alert: it won't.
0 [deleted] 2016-11-03
How could anyone believe any of that though?
With today's tech its entirely possible to make CGI videos of any political leader doing any terrible activity. Video, with sound, it does not really matter.
I wonder which political leaders will get totally screwed, and possibly murdered by the people, when a fake video of them comes out in all of their likeness.
2 DataPhreak 2016-11-03
Valid argument.
1 Arensi 2016-11-03
Where do you even read that
6 Malkron 2016-11-03
WTF are you talking about? Did you want him to be a pouty bitch about the whole deal? Yea, he got cheated, but he knows that throwing up his hands and saying "alright, fuck you guys" wouldn't get anything useful done. His campaign was always about changing the discourse of the DNC, and he's accomplished that. Having a big ego isn't good for being President, as evidenced by Trump.
30 LightofDvara 2016-11-03
No violence should be necessary. Individuals are responsible therefore only individuals should be held accountable. I am desperately hoping that it is being handled appropriately.
2 Jacks_Grin 2016-11-03
You better strap in and grab your guns and purchase some body armor mate. It's going to be bloody, but Others who came before us have lived through this and it's a necessary cycle to kill the corruption , burn it, and bury the ashes. We can't puss out on this one. So grab your nutsack and get ready.
1 sschudel 2016-11-03
Soo... Franklin?
1 ClintonHitSquadNum32 2016-11-03
I dont think the few in power, those named in these supposed revelations, can effectively levy their power over us if the vast majority decides they shouldn't.
Perhaps that is worded poorly,
IOW: If we the people revolt against these 16+ people, there is no army in the world that will follow them to suppress the revolt. The army is us.
1 FiskN 2016-11-03
Biden doesn't like Weiner because he cut him out of the loop.
43 honestlyimeanreally 2016-11-03
And the alternative is grab a pint and wait for all this to blow over at the Winchester?
1 junglemonkey47 2016-11-03
That's been edited out of the post. I don't know why.
1 LivingInNavarre 2016-11-03
http://imgur.com/DybaU2Y
-5 changingheroes 2016-11-03
Good argument! You're so open-minded!
1 hachi-seb 2016-11-03
Remember remember the 5th of November right?
1 panzin 2016-11-03
What revolution? Trump will win. Revolution won.
2 Ozzyo520 2016-11-03
Quick Google search: cite - quote (a passage, book, or author) as evidence for or justification of an argument or statement, especially in a scholarly work.
You're borderline retarded.
1 Ozzyo520 2016-11-03
Especially but not necessarily. No wonder you're a Trump supporter, you're fucking retarded.
1 Ozzyo520 2016-11-03
Here's the kids definition since it's obvious that's the only thing you'll understand:
"to quote as an example, authority, or proof <He cites several experts in his report."
1 DisabledNeckbeard 2016-11-03
This is the only way we will ever win. Why do you think cops have access to military grade weapon's/tanks? The Government knows it's a corrupted shithole and it's preparing for the worst.
1 kepners 2016-11-03
This won't happen. The rich and powerful are not going to go after fellow rich and powerful.... Ffs why will you not learn. No bodies will die before any of this hit the internet.
1 dks42 2016-11-03
The plot thickens. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OauLuWXD_RI
1 AGKontis 2016-11-03
ohhhh so THIS is how True Detective starts......
1 _The_Black_Rabbit_ 2016-11-03
Revolutions are needed from time to time. I'm not in favor of a violent revolution because I would rather see a peaceful transition but I am not ruling it out at this point.
5 igiveup_11 2016-11-03
NO, CNN and the MSM will NOT cover it at all.
After the election we should ALL hold everyone/anyone accountable for their actions. "Just taking orders" will NOT be accepted in America.
1 Uniqueusername121 2016-11-03
It will be worse if it's not taken down. The people have had enough.
1 no1113 2016-11-03
Revolution ≠ violence and war necessarily.
1 Harambe_Remembers 2016-11-03
military is made up of "we the people" can't see them fighting for the corrupt politicians
1 Notashillll 2016-11-03
there's something to your theory...
2 SovereignMan 2016-11-03
Rule 1. No bigoted slurs. Removed. 1st warning.
2 jeffinRTP 2016-11-03
Why, are you telling me that they don't have an agenda of their own?
7 GoofaDust 2016-11-03
Yeaaa boiiii
2 Renato1092 2016-11-03
Nah, not the jews. She could gas 6 mil of any other race/ethnic and walk free tho.
1 allmen 2016-11-03
yes please
1 whatsreallygoingon 2016-11-03
I'm curious as to how that material can be legally disseminated?
1 whatsreallygoingon 2016-11-03
The best revolution would be for all of us to go on self-imposed rations and to boycott every corporation that supports this madness. I wish that someone would write a digital protest app, so that we could congregate peacefully online.
0 dehehn 2016-11-03
1 Bealsywealsy 2016-11-03
Hillary for prison!
1 alleks88 2016-11-03
If this happens, I am sure that the election will be postponed.
But I doubt it is true
1 Sluts_Love_Me 2016-11-03
Violence does solve some problems.
Better it happen sooner, as opposed to later when our kids will have to fight.
1 TouchMeHerePls 2016-11-03
It won't happen.
2 Carlos_Dangers_wang 2016-11-03
Since so many of these people are tied to that-- we can hope it blows the lid off of zionist control also. In my wildest dreams, I never thought it would really happen. I'm hopeful it's true so we can do something about it.
1 yoloswaggg1337 2016-11-03
This has not been covered up yet. They are going to tell us about 9/11. #HOLYFUCKINGSHIT
1 18hockey 2016-11-03
It fucking happened holy shit
https://redd.it/5azc9k
https://redd.it/5b08cy
2 aniabub 2016-11-03
Oh good! I didnt even think when i was writing it, that it could be taken that way, i should have worded it better I think
3 terrorhawk_ 2016-11-03
True but I've always been of the mind that Anonymous is controlled opposition.
2 037_Engineering 2016-11-03
It also softens the blow. Someone says "PROOF!" and it isnt...its just evidence but people now dismiss credible evidence because it isnt the smoking gun they thought it would be. On its own without the sensationalism the evidence would mount up to something severely damaging but we think less of it because it isnt what we want it to be.
1 037_Engineering 2016-11-03
http://harpers.org/archive/2016/11/swat-team-2/
Any self respecting democrat needs to read this. Anyone interested in salvaging what is left of the 4th estate needs to read this. Anyone that voted for Sanders needs to share this.
1 bobop6 2016-11-03
This is gonna get shut down. No doubt. If something that damning came out,Assange is fucked. The media will claim it's fake, Dems will say it's Russia...we'll really see how deep the corruption goes.
1 OB1_kenobi 2016-11-03
That's gonna put a chalk circle around someone's political ambitions.
2 [deleted] 2016-11-03
Indeed. I don't necessarily trust Alex Jones but when Fox News is the only organization aside from Drudge and Breitbart that's doing their jobs and reporting on all these Hillary crimes, I gotta give them all the benefit of the doubt
1 satisfyinghump 2016-11-03
Well its been two days... Anything other then the mole in DOJ that gave Hillary's team (Podesta) a heads up...?
1 kangakomet 2016-11-03
How's this information release going.. I'm sure you'll say it was covered up, but just imagine... And go with me here.. What if there was no information? MIND BLOWN!
1 natetheproducer 2016-11-03
Well I don't believe with 100% certainty that they're involved in a pedo ring but I'm not gonna say that they aren't either. The evidence I'm working with is wikileaks. All I'm saying is that some of the emails are sketchy and don't make sense at face value. If there is a pedo ring this wouldn't be the first time either, look up the British pedo scandal and Jimmy savile, it really wouldn't be that shocking if it was happening in America too. However I refuse to believe something isn't possible just because it's disturbing. I suggest you check out the wikikeaks emails the are worth looking into. Also /r/pizzagate has a lot of a info that's worth checking out.