Philosophical discussion: At what point should we stop honoring freedom of religion?

4  2016-11-09 by [deleted]

[deleted]

31 comments

When said religions infringe on basic natural rights. Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of happiness. All men (yes, that means women as well) are born with inherit rights, endowed upon them by their Creator (Genius).

So basically all religions since they promote subjective beliefs instead of objective reality

That's not what I'm saying at all.... Read what I said.

First, you said nothing, you typed, additionally, I think you need to think harder about what you typed then apply it to the question OP posed.

A good answer to a VERY VERY fucking stupid question.

[deleted]

Hey I was saying the same shit less than a year ago. Don't take it personally.

I hope that you continue to learn and grow. The stuff on 8chan this afternoon will probably help you.

My belief: there are spiritual powers. The evil ones can been seen in action in the secret parties of the globalists (and others, no doubt)

EDIT: Fuck Catholicism, Islam and the rest of them Molech worshipping twisted dirty fucks. On a stick. Then destroy them. But I will always defend my and my family's right to worship the one true God in peace.

You want to persecute the Amish? The Baptists? The mennonites? Fuck you.

[deleted]

Started off that way, ended on a insulting note :)

I thought about trying to re-word but then I realized I was busy wrapping up some emails before driving to an election party.

^ That was also an insult. Random Muse on the internet isn't worthy of 5 more minutes of my time. Btw great handle. Can you imagine what the world would be like if the Teslas and Musks of the world had muses?

You need to educate yourself. Learn what an argument is, your opinions are worthless.

I spend a lot of time educating myself (I call it learning). The world is a big place though, if you think I'm doing it wrongly, can you give me a pointer? Thanks for your time in advance.

Read more philosophy. Stay away from scripture. Thats the best advice I can give.

I spent most of my life studying philosophy and only recently found the scripture. I take it that you are familiar with the scripture?

Which one of the thousands of scriptures are you talking about? The scripture of the Islamic holy texts?

The quoran is part of the Baphomet worshipping cult. It was designed by the Satanist Catholics to bring the Arabs into the Satan worshipping fold. So no.

There is only one inspired and given scripture. There are many others which are "provening grace" and part of natural law so they have some value as well. I would put the Nordic myths into the later category.

When they start sacrificing children to their god. When they start drinking blood, semen and milk cocktails.

http://livingresistance.com/2016/11/08/clinton-foundation-involved-child-trafficking-network-investigation/

Eh, they can drink whatever gross shit they want. It's when they start raping and murdering children that we have a problem.

Unless they are using baby blood for the drinks.

[deleted]

After Wikileaks dropped these emails I found my ass believing in God again.

Started with the sacrificing a chicken to Moloch emails.

Made a veil be lifted and allowed me to expand my spirituality.

Of course. But if they want to use cow blood or their own blood, consensually, then fuck each other all night long or whatever... man that's not my scene but whatever.

Your right.

I wouldn't mind. I think Buddhism would be a good choice for a national religion. I don't know, seems pretty non violent for me. What do you guys suggest? No religion at all?

Duh.

Is this r/conspiracy still?

That will be when the real teeth come out.

When muslims marry 9 year olds and syphilitic rabbis infect baby boys at their bris!

The minute it becomes politicized. And don't stop at stripping the tax exemptions; take the religious exceptions out of the DSM and treat the 'followers' equally with others suffering from delusions.

[deleted]

Everything you mentioned is a recognized crime already, and I'm not aware of a religious exemption for any of them.

At the point where it starts impeding freedom of religion.

This is a foolish question, dressed with the false imprimatur of intelligence using the pretentious word "philosophical."

Only the pretenders to scientific knowledge think that science contradicts religion. Meanwhile, the most intelligent scientists are majority theist.

[deleted]

Look at the atheist Hawkings. All his life, he's been elaborating on the integrals of string theory and Kip Thorne's big black book of gravitation.

Compare with Eric Verlinde and Nassim Haramein. Verlinde explained what gravity is. Haramein explained what protons are made of, unified the weak, electrical, and strong forces with the gravity force, and did so using a brilliant geometric argument that you can verify using a calculator.

Haramein is a genius and a theist. Hawkings, an atheist, is represented to be a genius, yet his work has produced nothing actually revolutionary.

[deleted]

What do you mean by "the church?" Do you mean the Roman Catholic church? Because, yes, even Christians want to distance themselves from the Roman Catholic Church.

What do you mean by "the church?" Do you mean the Roman Catholic church? Because, yes, even Christians want to distance themselves from the Roman Catholic Church.