edit - interesting - you people, sheep actually, think that because I lament the hairy orange paying his way into the white house that I must be for "the other side", and THAT is truly interesting to me! This entire election was decided a long time ago and the person who won, either way, is placed there in order to do the bidding of the people who put him, or her, there. There's no "choice". You didn't vote for the person "who thinks most like you". You haven't elected a president who is going to do what they said they would do.
This elections WAS rigged (and that to me is the funniest thing considering the 'rigging people' telling the public it's rigged - that will keep us laughing for a long fucking time!)... Remember Victoria Vinciguerra in the recent "Man From U.N.C.L.E." movie? When she had Solo pour himself a drink? And he realized, after he had taken a drink, that the drink had been spiked and asked "but how did you know I was going to drink the scotch?" and she replied "I didn't... I laced all the drinks".
When you have the money to buy an election, you make sure that everything is bought. I realize most of you have no concept of the amount of money that was pissed away on making sure that whoever you voted for will NOT be working for you.
I'm one of the people making sure that 99% of you perish in about 45 years thus heralding the transition of the "wealthiest inheriting the earth". The remaining percentage of survivors, or as we call you, "serfs", will be culled from the few people allowed to live and put to work feeding us and making sure our every whim is met.
He said puffed out. Look u dicks can go back to whatever hole u came out of now. Its over, so stop coming in here crying about it and move on with your lives.
Wikileaks ? seriously .. go fk yourselfare you serious with Wikileaks and your pizza pedo ring bs / conspiracy joke ? Do you think any " real critical thinker" would consider "legit" Wikileaks anymore since Assange vanished ? Not that I like (or trust) Assange btw.. but without him "leading" Wikileaks , Wikileaks isn't more reliable than Alex Jones website.
Wikileaks isn't more reliable than Alex Jones website.
lol
Edit: Wikileaks are big players in a big crazy world. You're an idiot if you don't think they have some sort of succession plan or can't function without a single individual.
Wikileaks has a 10-year record of never releasing a single falsified document, and is not connected to Russia. Everything they released were the actual e-mails of Hillary Clinton and her campaign staff. You had the opportunity to look through a window into the Hillary Clinton campaign, but you didn’t.
By ignoring the leaks, you ignored reality.
By not listening to your fellow Americans, and accusing them of being “conspiracy theorists” and trusting the corporate media, you ignored reality. By only following other liberals on social media, and only reading liberal or corporate news, once again ignoring reality. When Hillary Clinton was caught rigging the primary against Bernie Sanders, and Democrats nominated her anyway they ignored reality.
If Wikileaks was REALLY a serious and reliable source they would have leaked stuff about HRC (I ve read some of her emails, and I am not especially proud of it just saying... sneaking into somebody privacy/reading somebody else emails without auth is to me a serious matter btw) AND about Trump. Also if Assange had to disapear for some reason / his life (not) compromised, whatsoever, then he could have said/tweeted something such as "he had to go off radar for a while and might continue publsihing emails etc when he could resurface/after election, more quiet/his integrity ok/whatever". Assange not doing so is I believe either Wikileaks is some kind of fanatic group (lol) who doesnt care about its leader (Assange) neither its sources (Bradley Manning) when it matters. Or else that wikileaks has been somehow "compromised" at least since Assange disapeared.
Not maddening at all! Quite the contrary. I would hate to have any number of people take what I have to say to heart because that would be counterproductive to the goal.
The beauty of addressing a bunch of 'like thinkers' is you can say anything, even the most dire of truths and warnings of imminent destruction, and they'll go on with their agenda until the very end!
I believe this election points that out in grand fashion!
You lost, and nobody cares about your sour grapes. Learn to let go; the internet is still full of dick pics, and they aren't going to look at themselves you know.
33 comments
13 DrDougExeter 2016-11-09
Remember yesterday when you made a post about how you're leaving /r/conspiracy?
-7 wee_knee 2016-11-09
Yep - remember me being told to come back today once all the shills had left?
9 oroyplata 2016-11-09
That was deep. Thanks for sharing.
-6 wee_knee 2016-11-09
There is no 'deep' for what has just happened.
America just got hoodwinked.
edit - interesting - you people, sheep actually, think that because I lament the hairy orange paying his way into the white house that I must be for "the other side", and THAT is truly interesting to me! This entire election was decided a long time ago and the person who won, either way, is placed there in order to do the bidding of the people who put him, or her, there. There's no "choice". You didn't vote for the person "who thinks most like you". You haven't elected a president who is going to do what they said they would do.
This elections WAS rigged (and that to me is the funniest thing considering the 'rigging people' telling the public it's rigged - that will keep us laughing for a long fucking time!)... Remember Victoria Vinciguerra in the recent "Man From U.N.C.L.E." movie? When she had Solo pour himself a drink? And he realized, after he had taken a drink, that the drink had been spiked and asked "but how did you know I was going to drink the scotch?" and she replied "I didn't... I laced all the drinks".
When you have the money to buy an election, you make sure that everything is bought. I realize most of you have no concept of the amount of money that was pissed away on making sure that whoever you voted for will NOT be working for you.
7 oroyplata 2016-11-09
Here you are, on /r/conspiracy with your feathers puffed out, telling this community that we were hoodwinked.
Do you even wikileaks, bro? Educate yourself.
-7 wee_knee 2016-11-09
My feathers? Puffed out?
You're amusing beyond words!
I'm one of the people making sure that 99% of you perish in about 45 years thus heralding the transition of the "wealthiest inheriting the earth". The remaining percentage of survivors, or as we call you, "serfs", will be culled from the few people allowed to live and put to work feeding us and making sure our every whim is met.
You people are so fucking gullible.
Yeah - go 'wikileaks' it, fool.
6 RadMicah 2016-11-09
He said puffed out. Look u dicks can go back to whatever hole u came out of now. Its over, so stop coming in here crying about it and move on with your lives.
-1 wee_knee 2016-11-09
so green. So amusingly green.
-7 gipsyouioui 2016-11-09
Wikileaks ? seriously ..
go fk yourselfare you serious with Wikileaks and your pizza pedo ring bs / conspiracy joke ? Do you think any " real critical thinker" would consider "legit" Wikileaks anymore since Assange vanished ? Not that I like (or trust) Assange btw.. but without him "leading" Wikileaks , Wikileaks isn't more reliable than Alex Jones website.6 oroyplata 2016-11-09
lol
Edit: Wikileaks are big players in a big crazy world. You're an idiot if you don't think they have some sort of succession plan or can't function without a single individual.
-2 gipsyouioui 2016-11-09
What about the dead man switch ? that's what a "big player" would do lmao. Gimme a break with your succession bs.
6 Idiocy_or_Treason 2016-11-09
Wikileaks has a 10-year record of never releasing a single falsified document, and is not connected to Russia. Everything they released were the actual e-mails of Hillary Clinton and her campaign staff. You had the opportunity to look through a window into the Hillary Clinton campaign, but you didn’t. By ignoring the leaks, you ignored reality. By not listening to your fellow Americans, and accusing them of being “conspiracy theorists” and trusting the corporate media, you ignored reality. By only following other liberals on social media, and only reading liberal or corporate news, once again ignoring reality. When Hillary Clinton was caught rigging the primary against Bernie Sanders, and Democrats nominated her anyway they ignored reality.
-6 gipsyouioui 2016-11-09
If Wikileaks was REALLY a serious and reliable source they would have leaked stuff about HRC (I ve read some of her emails, and I am not especially proud of it just saying... sneaking into somebody privacy/reading somebody else emails without auth is to me a serious matter btw) AND about Trump. Also if Assange had to disapear for some reason / his life (not) compromised, whatsoever, then he could have said/tweeted something such as "he had to go off radar for a while and might continue publsihing emails etc when he could resurface/after election, more quiet/his integrity ok/whatever". Assange not doing so is I believe either Wikileaks is some kind of fanatic group (lol) who doesnt care about its leader (Assange) neither its sources (Bradley Manning) when it matters. Or else that wikileaks has been somehow "compromised" at least since Assange disapeared.
4 gwsb 2016-11-09
awww... of all the flavours available to you, you went with salty.
5 gwsb 2016-11-09
You're dissonant... your headline critisizes people for electing a carny then you turn around and say it doesn't matter who's elected.
Which one is it?
1 wee_knee 2016-11-09
yes. which on indeed...?
3 gwsb 2016-11-09
Wow, yeah, you're way too edgy for me, I'm afraid I would cut myself.
1 wee_knee 2016-11-09
How kitschy! A real wordsmith!
You should be in show business.
1 wee_knee 2016-11-09
My 'headline' and my conflicting comments remind you of anything?
No?
Think back to this in a year or so.
3 oroyplata 2016-11-09
It must be maddening to have all the answers when no one listens.
-1 wee_knee 2016-11-09
Not maddening at all! Quite the contrary. I would hate to have any number of people take what I have to say to heart because that would be counterproductive to the goal.
The beauty of addressing a bunch of 'like thinkers' is you can say anything, even the most dire of truths and warnings of imminent destruction, and they'll go on with their agenda until the very end!
I believe this election points that out in grand fashion!
Good luck to you. Have fun! (but hurry!)
4 KendleC 2016-11-09
Angry little shit hairball alert. Don't waste your time, it just gets worse.
-1 wee_knee 2016-11-09
fully engaged shill alert - oh wait... that's a shill tactic. my bad
2 luckinator 2016-11-09
Liberals. Do they even think?
2 s70n3834r 2016-11-09
If, by liberals, you means SJWs.
0 wee_knee 2016-11-09
Do the bulk of America's citizens?
1 Nogrim5 2016-11-09
if you think about it, its fairly reasonable considering what a shit-show-circus it is.
1 s70n3834r 2016-11-09
Carnies are distinct from the talent, but OP does not know that.
1 s70n3834r 2016-11-09
You lost, and nobody cares about your sour grapes. Learn to let go; the internet is still full of dick pics, and they aren't going to look at themselves you know.
-2 wee_knee 2016-11-09
I lost...?
How amusing!
You have no idea how much YOU lost and we've won.
1 s70n3834r 2016-11-09
Dick pics are waiting.
1 wee_knee 2016-11-09
OooOOooo
how cryptic!
0 wee_knee 2016-11-09
you're here on /r/conspiracy.
you apparently taking a lot of stuff at face value.
I would think you've learned something.
You haven't.
-1 wee_knee 2016-11-09
so green. So amusingly green.