About an hour ago u/alex_forbetter really let loose on what seems to be disinfo/spam from naturalnews.com, dude put up a good 10 links in a row i'd say and has no comment history whatsoever.

Thing is, While CTR was unearthed and proved to be a huge hit to Clinton's online reputation, there still hasn't been a complete uncovering of a Trump/Anti-Clinton based CTR that actually happened to be talked about in Social Media before being silenced if not redacted.

I swear that there was information on it in a Trump KYM entry just two days ago yet now I cannot find it at all. I expect someone to respond saying such an entry was false or never existed. I'd feel like 1984 is coming.

Have you been in a deep coma for the last 18 months?

This sub is 100% anti-war, and that's one of the main reasons (apart from her media-facilitated corruption) that Clinton got so much hate on this sub. She stated several times that her first priority in office would be to "take out Assad". For anyone with a brain larger than a walnut, that means a war against Russia. Trump, for all his faults, has repeatedly made comments promoting a de-escalation of tensions with Russia.

Only time will tell. Hillary promised war, and based on her past record, she would have delivered it.

Of course Trump could turn out to be much more hawkish than we thought, but there's cause for optimism. He is a populist, and he knows the majority of the US are fed up with pointless and costly foreign wars.

The election was not a 50/50 split in popular vote. I can't believe how many votes they stole this time. It's shocking.

How is this sub 100% anti war? America just voted in a president that seeks to undue everything that the other half of a America fought for...

When two conflicting ideas meet, the only outcome is in fact war.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMArIc5Hn_g

Most of us will die soon, but at least we got to open Pandora's box for a second time right?

You said it yourself...

America just voted in a president that seeks to undo everything that the other half of a America fought for...

The operative word being "fought". Obama and Clinton are warmongers and they probably have more blood on their hands than the Bushes. Obama has personally authorised hundreds of assassinations by drone, in complete violation of international law.

Are you insinuating that the further expansion of white supremacy to brown skinned countries was started by a black man?

Bushed killed 2 million Muslims, show me where you can say the same for Obama.

Hundreds of thousands have died in Syria and Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan, and many more in Yemen and Pakistan as a result of Obama's (and Clinton's) policies. They have killed people in more countries than both of the Bushes.

Again, if you are insinuating that a Obama started the war in the middle east, I'm sorry but you're going to have a bad time.

his SoS started the refugee crisis and threw parts of the middle east into chaos. You can say the decision to hire her was never his to make, but on the surface, it's still his hire.

Their plan was always going to end on Syria, the Refugee Crisis saved brown skin people who would have just been more people dead by bombs dropping.

They had to be moved, or they would have died.

The problem many have with the refugees, is the same problem whites in America have with minorities.

Tactics like claiming random people are being raped was used right here in America on Blacks, same story different time.

Fake photos flood Internet after sexual assaults in Germany

Hillary causing the Libya crisis was no mistake, it would have only created two separate economies that would have bankrupted America on one end while empowering the already richest of the rich to become even richer on the other.

They took all the money out of the country when Obama was elected, that's what the so called housing bubble was.

Their plan was always going to end on Syria, the Refugee Crisis saved brown skin people who would have just been more people dead by bombs dropping.

I can't believe I just read that. jesus

Fake photos flood Internet after sexual assaults in Germany

Yeah...and a Muslim woman said she got her hijab ripped off by white Trump supporters, and that was a lie. Stop acting like this is a white vs races issue.

Also, there are dozens upon dozens of videos online showing refugee rioting in Europe. If those aren't Soros paid for riots, then it's proof that they are a big fucking problem there.

I was not there but...

A hijab being ripped off and mass magnitude of false rape claims are not the same.

You act like rape isn't prevalent in the countries those people come from.

he certainly kept it rolling. Too much focus on the color of someone's skin instead of the character of their heart. You sound like a racist.

Nah, I'm a realist, no bullshit with me, I only speak the truth.

How does this sub equate to what the presidential election results were? There's people in here from more than just one country bubba.

It was a large help, millions of people use Reddit and this sub is one of the top subs on Reddit used.

The allowing of propaganda or incorrect information being pushed on purpose for people to read, see and believe allows it to be a cornerstone of the actual internet.

For example, the word conspiracy theorist began appearing in a large magnitude all over the internet.

User goes to google what conspiracy theorist means and ends up jumping into the conspiracy realm.

It is at this point that the user is initiated into whatever conspiracy is going on and being mass produced from shadow corporations.

If there is no real correction made, the user is forced to believe whatever they are told, most of the time only regurgitating what they have heard rather than what they have researched.

Then you should be crying about /r/politics as well for their blatant CTR propaganda. What, it's only OK when they do it?

Politics is doing exactly what it's supposed to being doing, it's mainstream. Here, we are supposed to be critically thinking and pushing the idea of critical thought.

That was the initial reason of why I began to participate in /r/conspiracy 9 years ago.

The allowing of propaganda or incorrect information being pushed on purpose for people to read, see and believe allows it to be a cornerstone of the actual internet.

Who decides what is just propaganda and what is real? It sounds like you want someone else to decide for you what you should be ingesting.

For example, the word conspiracy theorist began appearing in a large magnitude all over the internet

That term has been around in abundance prior to the birth of the internet.

User goes to google what conspiracy theorist means and ends up jumping into the conspiracy realm.

Not necessarily.

It is at this point that the user is initiated into whatever conspiracy is going on and being mass produced from shadow corporations.

That's a poorly made assumption. There's plenty of well known conspiracies listed in the wiki for this subreddit people can research on their own that have been verified as true.

If there is no real correction made, the user is forced to believe whatever they are told, most of the time only regurgitating what they have heard rather than what they have researched.

Again, who is making these corrections?

And "researched" is the key word here. This is not Facebook. We expect everyone in this sub to use reasoning and critical thought to come to their own conclusions about information being shared here.

This community is about keeping an open mind but it's also about using your faculties in order to find the underlying truth in what you ingest. NO ONE is expected to just immediately believe everything that is posted here as fact. Everything should be scrutinized by the individual.

We don't need a nanny to tell us what is propaganda and what is truth. That's exactly what you are suggesting and is counter intuitive to open information sharing.

You want to suppress what you deem to be incorrect information.

Who decides what is just propaganda and what is real? It sounds like you want someone else to decide for you what you should be ingesting.

The user does, if he only has one side that he listens to, he's going to be brainwashed.

That term has been around in abundance prior to the birth of the internet.

In today's world is a pop culture, long ago, you were truly weird for even talking about it.

That's a poorly made assumption. There's plenty of well known conspiracies listed in the wiki for this subreddit people can research on their own that have been verified as true.

These are not the conspiracies of today taking place. They are old and documented so that they can be applied to the events of today, not just to take up brain space.

Again, who is making these corrections?

Again the user decides.

And "researched" is the key word here. This is not Facebook. We expect everyone in this sub to use reasoning and critical thought to come to their own conclusions about information being shared here.

Yes but content proves other wise.

This community is about keeping an open mind but it's also about using your faculties in order to find the underlying truth in what you ingest. NO ONE is expected to just immediately believe everything that is posted here as fact. Everything should be scrutinized by the individual.

But it's not when they aren't presented with the other side.

We don't need a nanny to tell us what is propaganda and what is truth. That's exactly what you are suggesting and is counter intuitive to open information sharing.

You want to suppress what you deem to be incorrect information.

Yes okay but that doesn't deter from the fact that it's happening.

this sub will be overrun with government controlled rhetoric, pro war shills, and disinfo/misinfo..

Exactly like the last 18 months of Hillary shills. Got it.

News flash: this sub is already overrun with disinfo/misinfo and has been for, well, since the beginning. It's just getting easier to recognize...

I think it'll follow what we saw with CTR. Some subs might be taken over by shills, but they won't be able to gain a foothold here. Shilling simply doesn't work with paranoid or awakened individuals.

Nice try Hitlery.

The current wall is just fine.

There is no current wall. They will all go back and the wall will be unbeatable.

There isn't? I need to check ny eyesight then. No problem. Tunnels are my specialty.

I doubt any of those fucks would be dumb enough to appear pro war in here.

How is this sub 100% anti war? America just voted in a president that seeks to undue everything that the other half of a America fought for...

When two conflicting ideas meet, the only outcome is in fact war.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMArIc5Hn_g

Most of us will die soon, but at least we got to open Pandora's box for a second time right?

Who decides what is just propaganda and what is real? It sounds like you want someone else to decide for you what you should be ingesting.

The user does, if he only has one side that he listens to, he's going to be brainwashed.

That term has been around in abundance prior to the birth of the internet.

In today's world is a pop culture, long ago, you were truly weird for even talking about it.

That's a poorly made assumption. There's plenty of well known conspiracies listed in the wiki for this subreddit people can research on their own that have been verified as true.

These are not the conspiracies of today taking place. They are old and documented so that they can be applied to the events of today, not just to take up brain space.

Again, who is making these corrections?

Again the user decides.

And "researched" is the key word here. This is not Facebook. We expect everyone in this sub to use reasoning and critical thought to come to their own conclusions about information being shared here.

Yes but content proves other wise.

This community is about keeping an open mind but it's also about using your faculties in order to find the underlying truth in what you ingest. NO ONE is expected to just immediately believe everything that is posted here as fact. Everything should be scrutinized by the individual.

But it's not when they aren't presented with the other side.

We don't need a nanny to tell us what is propaganda and what is truth. That's exactly what you are suggesting and is counter intuitive to open information sharing.

You want to suppress what you deem to be incorrect information.

Yes okay but that doesn't deter from the fact that it's happening.

Thing is, While CTR was unearthed and proved to be a huge hit to Clinton's online reputation, there still hasn't been a complete uncovering of a Trump/Anti-Clinton based CTR that actually happened to be talked about in Social Media before being silenced if not redacted.

I swear that there was information on it in a Trump KYM entry just two days ago yet now I cannot find it at all. I expect someone to respond saying such an entry was false or never existed. I'd feel like 1984 is coming.