Trump is Controlled Opposition
74 2016-11-14 by HorusNoon
(The following are rough thoughts at best):
Stephen Bannon was appointed as an advisor. This is bad, real bad. We are heading straight toward the cultural war we've been talking about over the past year. The racial rhetoric that began with Obama's organization has come full circle. Trump is controlled opposition. I see this now. He is in place to continue what Obama started: a race war on American streets.
Hillary clinton was never meant to get in power. I believe the elite employeed hackers to leak emails to wikileaks on clinton, fed her false Intel about the Russians as the culprits. That's why she was so shocked when she lost the election; she realized she too was just a pawn (again). (See Obama's 2008 democratic primary victory over her).
Notice the rhetoric about the 99% versus the 1% has been completely removed from mainstream media, and supplemented with "racism this, racism that"... the elite are using it to divide and conquer. We were uniting as a people against the elitist scum that control our country and they pulled a bait and switch on us and turned us against each other. Love is banished. Hate is in full control. The political paradigm from left to right is full of hate for each other. We are so stupid. Simple-minded fools, we Americans. I can't believe I missed this... never saw it coming. I thought Trump was a wild card. How foolish of me. Continue to see violence spread across this country... it's happening. Divide and conquer.
43 comments
22 [deleted] 2016-11-14
You've figured it out. This is why the whole racism tensions thing only escalated to a ridiculous level after Obama got elected for a second term. Put a black man in office and everything is peaceful because the black people got what they thought they wanted. Second term rolls around and HOLY FUCK COPS ARE SHOOTING US LEFT AND RIGHT WHERE IS OUR BLACK HERO???
Then magically a big spooky "racist" billionaire comes along and wins the presidency and people are just oh so shocked, shocked enough that they might just start a real race war. This is controlled, manufactured division with specific goals in mind. Always has been. This plan has been forming for a very, very long time.
5 passenger_pidgin 2016-11-14
I would agree that the race war scenario has existed in the NWO playbook for awhile.
While it might be true that the race war is an idea they would like to promote, the only way it can happen is in the most segregated cities. I say this for 2 reasons. 1) while stereotypes exist and define our initial assessments of individuals, most people have more in common than not and 2) Most Americans are conditioned against hardcore violence. As proof, I ask - how many fistfights have you been in over the last 5 years? Most people don't want violence when it can be visited back upon them. Hell, look at the black on white "hate crimes" that we have seen over the past few weeks; those weren't murders, lynchings, or rapes, just a few people getting black eyes and insults. I know that these things are ugly, but I submit that the limitation in the violence suggests a much 0reater fundamental respect for "the other" than we lead ourselves to believe.
In my own mind, I feel that the whole "racism" play by the media is a psyop designed to exploit the stereotypical hive mind that seems to dominate certain racial groups, when they are in the process of rioting.
6 [deleted] 2016-11-14
I actually agree with you. I would never and don't personally know anyone who would ever- harm anyone else unless they had a very good reason to. However that doesn't mean TPTB aren't trying to incite a full blown race war. I'm just with you in thinking it probably won't play out the way they want it to.
3 passenger_pidgin 2016-11-14
I agree with you that they want it, too.
The problem (for them) is that very few of us are still that ignorant. I feel like it is important to say that they want it, rather than it's coming. We don't want the weakest links from any race running to extremist groups for "safety"...
Round these parts, we gotta control the narrative, y'hear? :)
3 Outofmany 2016-11-14
It could just as easily the psy op. Not a real war but one that plays in the mind. It would have the same effect.
3 BingoRage 2016-11-14
Oh crap. hrc won. forget all my prev. consp. theories, trump is definitely the stooge. jade helm!
2 punkinhat 2016-11-14
The sophisticated well funded version of Manson's ''Helter Skelter'' plans.
1 [deleted] 2016-11-14
"She may be a lover but she ain't no dancer"
You see Sadie, this is clearly about how the black panthers are going to come down from the mountains and obliterate the white man. Now call Tex over here and let's tell him about our plans to kill some pretty white people in their sleep
19 punkinhat 2016-11-14
The notion of controlled opposition is also controlled opposition. Permanent paranoia that nothing and no one can be trusted leads to hopeless/ helpless docility.
6 DrauglinRog 2016-11-14
If the truth is in fact that Trump is controlled opposition, pointing it out is still important, regardless of whether it has a negative effect on some people. Just because some of these truths are hard ones to swallow doesn't mean that we should just disregard them for the sake of comfort.
3 DrDuplicitous 2016-11-14
Good point.
n/a Kingpink2 2016-11-14
Not necessarily. People are only really interested in politics when the office is meaningful. But when it comes to the presidential race, almost all the candidates are already thoroughly vetted. They wont commit voter fraud at that level having to do it in the whole country with such exposure.
People need to get involved in politics at the earlier stages, congress and below even local. Its here where voter fraud is likely to happen to advance a puppet over an average joe getting into politics.
10 Spidda 2016-11-14
Jeb Bush is controlled opposition YOU are a paid shill
9 DrDuplicitous 2016-11-14
Who isn't controlled opposition? I can't think of any presidential candidate who isn't, Trump included. Alex Jones and Roger Stones are part of that COINTELPRO network as well.
4 Spidda 2016-11-14
prove it lmao why would hillary hate alex jones so much if hes cointelpro
11 DrDuplicitous 2016-11-14
You don't think Alex Jones gained a whole whack of new followers after Hillary went out of her way to publicly name him to millions of people across the country? Think about that for a minute.
7 SkepticalFaceless 2016-11-14
You just answered your own question
5 DrauglinRog 2016-11-14
That was an amazing example of the staggering level of ignorance we face. He literally thinks that Hillary, a known liar of epic proportions, doesn't like Alex Jones simply because she expressed her dislike for him, and that that therefore proves her and AJ aren't playing for the same team.
Shit just boggles my mind..
8 1923johndavis1999 2016-11-14
Two fucking years you’ve shat this out. Give it a fucking rest.
4 DrauglinRog 2016-11-14
"Notice the rhetoric about the 99% versus the 1% has been completely removed from mainstream media, and supplemented with "racism this, racism that""
Very good point.
2 SocialJusticeVVarior 2016-11-14
The American public is very divided. Plus the country is at the final stages of decline. I posted this lecture a thousand times, but it is still relevant. The guy shows you a process on how to bring down a nation and take control of it. It's a long boring process that destroys a nation through covert and overt means.
Here's the complete lecture.
The final process is might be an invasion by the enemy, crisis or civil war. Since the US government wants total control, they will start the civil war intentionally to justify security over freedom. This is why you see Soros funding protests, he's promoting civil strife and conflict between people. They want a totalitarian government to rule.
2 Lookingfortheanswer1 2016-11-14
So what is the ultimate goal? To make the US socialist - along with the rest of the world?
1 HorusNoon 2016-11-14
No, I dont see true socialism as the agenda at all. We are currently under a mixed economy, and I believe TPTB prefer to keep it that way going foward; essentially, we have a very restrictive form of Capitalism (top-down Corporatism) wrapped in a guise of socialistic values in which involuntary taxation is used as the justification to fund the socialistic functions of the government.
TPTB need the masses to behave like serfs. Going to work, slaving away for barely enough to keep their families afloat; couple that with the injected belief that hard work mixed with a bit of talent or luck will allow someone to strike it rich, and we have a mass of people working their lives away, begging both the current and the forseeable next POTUS to give them a leg up (a tax break, a handout, etc). The masses are reliant on the system, not vice versa. TPTB prefer this method.
(Theoretically the system is reliant on the masses, but only in the sense that the masses have the power to destroy the system if they collectively agree to no longer participate in the system; stop participating, then the system surely fails.)
The problem is that Americans are conceptually aware of notions of corruption and secrecy in the government. They may not understand the finer details (fine print) of what the scandals and conspiracies really are, but they accept that the possibility is conceivable. For TPTB, this is the last hurdle. They use PsyOps to penetrate the collective national discussion and turn the direction away from 'them' toward 'us,' such as they are currently doing with the 'racism' dialogue being injected into our collective consciousness; but ultimately, they want a more restrictive Internet and a citizenry that is willing to spy on each other; from there, they will tiptoe closer to mass surveillance that we saw officially formulate under George W Bush's two terms.
So, short answer: socialism in its truest form will not happen, as it cannot function under a monetary system, which is required by TPTB to properly control the masses.
1 HorusNoon 2016-11-14
As far the ultimate goal? That's why we are here discussing... we are trying to discover the answers to those questions.
2 PieroTheBarber 2016-11-14
I agree
2 chiangrai_amy 2016-11-14
I had a dream where there was a big message saying basically "he's a plant." Yes folks, we are definitely not out of the woods anytime as long as the Cabal still calls the shots.
1 HorusNoon 2016-11-14
Does your dream refer to my post?
2 BennyOcean 2016-11-14
I think he's legit. It's easy to think TPTB are all-powerful and never can lose, but I don't think that's right. They lost this one.
2 abwisdom9 2016-11-14
2017 nostradamus predictions
2 ghettomotels 2016-11-14
Trump even said on 60 minutes he believes in a more "simple" system where the person with more votes wins.
He doesn't even want to live in DC. Would you?
The whole thing has been a nonstop vaudeville show.
Meanwhile, Hillary hasn't said anything since the concession (and that part wasn't even aired) regarding winning the popular vote in landslide.
The old infowars would have recognized this, but ever since they've become Breitbart 2.0, they have to assuage (or was that assange lol) the alt-right puppets.
1 HorusNoon 2016-11-14
Yes, the old Infowars is officially dead.
2 [deleted] 2016-11-14
[deleted]
2 trinsic-paridiom 2016-11-14
There is a a choice, Non-Consent. The most reasonable one if you are into common sense.
If you treat a government like a business and you are the owner, you wouldn't be electing corrupt employees into office. You would be withdrawing your consent which would force that business to shutdown since that business only operates by consent of the governed.
Stop letting perception of "no choice" make choices for you, and stop letting others pressure you into to making choices you don't agree with.
When we choose to stop playing the game we dissolve the facade of presumed authority. To destroy a lie, live the truth.
1 HorusNoon 2016-11-14
Great comment.
1 ghettomotels 2016-11-14
This is not new information, lol
1 [deleted] 2016-11-14
Shut up, he already ended the tpp.
1 HorusNoon 2016-11-14
Incorrect. As I write this response, Trump has not yet dissolved the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
If he does or doesn't is still to be determined.
1 [deleted] 2016-11-14
Chuck Schubert and the eu say it's dead
1 HorusNoon 2016-11-14
They are saying it's dead (or rather goung to be) based on what Trump's stance is on the TPP. But technically he hasn't dissolved it yet (as of 20 November 2016).
n/a Kingpink2 2016-11-14
I dont think its so much about a cultural war. Its really simple. People lost faith in the media and in elected politicians because it was just a play really. They were looking for somebody to galvanise them into bringing about change.
Trump is that somone, but rather than questioning the system and structures in place he galvanises all that spirit of protest on his person, with him the people who want to audit the fed are convinced 9/11 was an inside job etc. feel like they got their guy in the white house. The outgroup backs the whitehouse now and the respect of the system and the office with that particular outgroup is restored.
-3 DrDuplicitous 2016-11-14
Of course he is. You're only figuring this out now?
3 HorusNoon 2016-11-14
I wouldn't mind if you'd share some of your additional insights as well.
4 DrDuplicitous 2016-11-14
Here's some more:
Trump controlled by Mossad (Israel)
Pt. 1 - https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/10/29/trump-controlled-by-mossad/
Pt. 2 - https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/11/08/trump-controlled-by-the-mossad-part-ii/
1 HorusNoon 2016-11-14
Good stuff. I'll take a look.
1 DrDuplicitous 2016-11-14
Isn't it obvious? All politicians are blackmailed. You don't get to be in a high position without being compromised in some way, usually sexually. Clinton and Trump are both compromised with at least one of the same child sex rings. The Franklin Scandal also factors in here, as Trump's mentor, mobster lawyer Roy Cohn was implicated in Franklin. Good bet that Clinton is tied to Franklin as well.
1 HorusNoon 2016-11-14
Nice comment. Thank you. I'll look into this.