Wikileaks is censoring these words in post submissions, pgp, dkim, mismatched hashes. Try to post asking why the pgp isn't used, the dkim is missing in new emails, the hashes are mismatched. Wikileaks sub is compromised
734 2016-11-16 by showmeurboobsplznthx
122 comments
109 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
They also linked to cp. They are baiting users into honeypots.
https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/5d5sxp/here_is_a_useful_resource_of_links_for_visiting/da204pn/
That is a perma link to his comment where he tells people to use tor without protection 'just download the bundle and go', after linking to a resource full of CP.
It started with cleansing all who doubted them, through massive bans. Followed by enforcing only content they approve of/agree with.
Hence the killing of the sub, in 'new' there are hardly any new posts - towards the bottom there is a 1 day old post. Which means the subreddit is borderline dead. If you notice, a lot of the posts are from mods. The other thing is, they put all these mods on to 'fix' the sub, due to an influx of users, and they ended up killing it.
Somehow admins haven't banned him, I assume he has pull with admins, or is working for an intelligence agency.
40 brentapps 2016-11-16
Please read this - assume all WikiLeaks after October 16th are fake. ALL of these are the ones pushing that the democrats were using these tactics to beat trump... before October 16th there was NOTHING anti trump at all from an e-mail sent by podesta or Clinton. This is a coverup because they are pushing a democrat vs republican civil war and want us to think Trump is on our side.
14 fat_osvaldo 2016-11-16
I wouldn't be so sure, the emails are still verified by DKIM.
3 gymkhana86 2016-11-16
Does DKIM extend to attachments? They could have added Steno attachments after the fact that couldn't be DKIM verified right?
10 dogcomplex 2016-11-16
Didn't the comet pizza stuff appear after Oct 16th? Would make a lot of sense, as a convincing but smoking-gun-less distraction that makes all its proponents seem crazy...
5 sammythemc 2016-11-16
I'm thinking that has more to do with all the crazy motherfuckers who fall for shit like that
6 dogcomplex 2016-11-16
I dunno man. It's shady enough that either it's true, or it's a trap made to look convincing, or it's deliberate misinformation paid for by the trump campaign. My money's on one of the later, but I don't think it's just people innocently over-extrapolating data - It's either hoax or truth.
3 sammythemc 2016-11-16
I don't think it's people 'innocently" extrapolating data, but I do believe the people pushing it actually believe it, they just believe it because it's on a mental backdrop of wealthy and powerful people regularly fucking and eating children. They're not lying, they're mistaken. It seems awfully convenient to pass off the more wacko theories from people you otherwise agree with as false flags or intentional red herrings rather than just owning the fact that you (we) rub elbows with some wacky broken clock types who are often very wrong.
2 dogcomplex 2016-11-16
Well yeah I mean - drawing the full conclusion of it requires a certain stretch of the imagination and predisposition towards some "rich and powerful people eat babies" mindset. But an actual look at the evidence and you can't help but think something very creepy is going on. I'm saying it's quite the coincidence if that's all just innocent interactions being extrapolated - I'm fairly convinced (as someone I thought to be a reasonable person) that something's up. It's just far more likely to be deliberate misinformation/substantiated lies or a deliberate attempt to plant a particularly ridiculous conspiracy that will never be proven to discredit the rest of the clinton criticism, rather than an actual undercover pedo ring (but hey - they're not unprecedented).
Likely "boring" outcome: the pizza thing was code for drugs or good ol' fashioned American prostitution.
5 [deleted] 2016-11-16
Weren't the Podesta emails rolling out automatically anyway?
From Oct. 12.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/786172351192797184
That seems to imply that the Podesta emails are just rolling out automatically. Granted, the whole process may have been hijacked, but I assumed at the time this meant that Assange or whoever did not need to publish each batch.
Also, as /u/fat_osvaldo mentions, there are emails verifiable by DKIM published after Oct. 16th. It was never the case that all of Podesta's emails were verifiable by DKIM.
Definitely the Wikileaks sub is compromised, and the absence of Assange since Oct. 16 is troubling.
Edit: Here is an email published 2016-10-31 that is verifiable by DKIM.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37262
29 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
I'm muted from all wikileaks subs, and they blocked me on twitter. Da fuck???
12 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
Did they block you on twitter at the same time? Were you spamming their twitter?
The mod is a mod on many wikileaks subs, and hence the massive bans. Normally it's just ban to the relevant sub, do you have your comment that got you banned? Did you post on the other subs, or is it just ones he moderates?
I mean...how would they know it's related (your reddit acc and twitter acc)? The reason you got banned on twitter is not the same reason you got banned from the sub, is what I'm saying.
I do believe something feels off about their twitter, but to assume they are both connected, is really reaching. I'd need proof you didn't post on their twitter to believe it was connected, and that would mean you are being monitored heavily, which I very much doubt.
30 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
On twitter I posted a link that teaches people how to check the hashes, keys, and dkim. Like 10 minutes later it was removed and I was blocked. I posted it again from my second account and the same thing. This morning On the wikileaks sub, I posted asking why the pgp key isn't used, the dkim is missing and their hashes don't match. It showed on my account page but not in the sub so I messaged the mods and they never responded so I messaged them again with more harsh words and they replied calling me a fucker or something close, I can copy pasta their response. They don't want people to know how to check authentication.
24 ablevictor 2016-11-16
This sounds important. It suggests who ever is running the twitter account disapproves of the link or its content. So could you send me the link? :)
20 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
Every tech cryptography site will show you how... But they don't want you to. Snowden and assange told us to watch for this and learn how this all works. I suggest people check into it.
2 [deleted] 2016-11-16
Keep me updated
2 ablevictor 2016-11-16
Do you have a good source for learning?
1 Some-Random-Chick 2016-11-16
Google?
Disclaimer: Not trying to be a dick
1 ablevictor 2016-11-16
No worries. Can't go digging but was open to suggestions for good places to start.
16 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
https://www.cryptologie.net/article/268/how-to-compare-password-hashes-in-php/
7 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/what-can-you-learn-from-an-email-header-metadata/
5 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
https://veracrypt.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Digital%20Signatures
6 libertyant 2016-11-16
wikileaks blocked you on twitter????
3 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
Both accounts attached to my secure device... I've never heard them ban anyone. Unless they consider me altright and Twitter banned me? I should of screen shot it. I can't log into those accounts anymore either.
3 EyeCrush 2016-11-16
Twitter, Facebook, Google; all those sites are compromised. I really do hope people realize that there are far too many censorship 'coincidences' lately on all three platforms.
Gab.ai will be the new Twitter.
17 SoCo_cpp 2016-11-16
This is far from simply linking to CP.
That is a Tor Hidden Wiki. It is a common thing. It just has links to various dark net stuff. They get posted regularly on /r/onions /r/tor, etc. Yes, following the links will lead to CP, illegal drugs, fraud credit card trading stuff, illegal online gambling, and tons and tons of scams that pretend to be the of the other things listed.
3 Saudi-Prince 2016-11-16
why would a mod of /r/wikileaks post that? what does it even have to do with anything?
10 barbief 2016-11-16
Hidden wiki is a pretty well known 'start page', if you will. Like a brief "here are examples of what you can do and find on the deep web"
I don't think linking that page is a big deal personally.
1 Saudi-Prince 2016-11-16
but why is it posted on /r/wikileaks? for what? what content is it providing?
1 jarxlots 2016-11-16
Regardless of the intention of the Hidden wiki, it is mostly filled with scams and bad onion links. Be wary.
1 SoCo_cpp 2016-11-16
It was probably just a push for people to use Tor. Tor hidden wikis get outdated and die often. Keeping a working one that isn't outdated and full of dead links and shutdown sites is difficult.
1 Saudi-Prince 2016-11-16
the purpose of /r/wikileaks is to discuss the leaks, not encourage people to use tor and browse the darkweb. And they are VERY strict.. they banned 48 people in a 2 day period because those people tried to discuss Julian Assange. Yes, despite what the sidebar says, the new mods have decided julian assange is "off topic" for /r/wikileaks.
So explain to me how encouraging people to use Tor is "on topic"?
8 Crazyeyedcoconut 2016-11-16
We have a mod here who is in both WikiLeaks and conspiracy u/AssuredlyAThrowAway who can give us some insight regarding the situation
10 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
Bad idea IMO.
It will be the same ol' same ol'.
Meanwhile, approximately nothing done later..
3 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
Told you, he is sitting here trying to defend linking to child porn now...fucking lol. Despicable.
9 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2016-11-16
Why are you calling the hidden wiki child porn? Do you call google child porn?
7 RoboBama 2016-11-16
What's going on? Why is /r/wikileaks hemorrhaging internally?
5 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2016-11-16
There was a bit of an upheaval last week when new moderators were added; however those with pro-clinton bias were removed, the problematic bans they issued were reversed, and we are now trying to add public mod logs to ensure community oversight of all mod actions.
The OP of this thread is upset because the mod team refused to agree with his assertion that a link to the hidden wiki (or google) is tantamount to child porn.
3 RoboBama 2016-11-16
Well that's all well and good, but the more pressing question is this: Is your mod team itself even able to verify the validity of wikileaks' submissions as of late?
Or would the sub just be described as a WL related sub and you guys are just taking what you can get?
edit: Nnvmnd i answered my own quesstion
0 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2016-11-16
Yea, we don't have any official connection with wikileaks as of yet and simply look to facilitate discussion related to their journalism; however the verified staff from their AMA did reach out the other day. It has yet to materialize into anything though.
7 George_Tenet 2016-11-16
You think the people who answered ama questions were actual wikileaks staff? What about their unable to do an imgur selfie
7 gymkhana86 2016-11-16
Verified staff? How did you verify them? Nothing with a valid PGP key has been posted.
1 TelicAstraeus 2016-11-16
what's the holdup?
0 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
Recheck that bud.
0 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
No, are you projecting? The hidden wiki is one thing, the link your buddy posted, links to child porn.
I just read an article about how google removed illegal content, let me pull that up for you.
Source: http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/15/technology/facebook-google-fake-news-presidential-election/
Any other baseless accusations?
Also, does this count as harassment - two posts before I reply once? One of which accuses me of searching for child pornography. Is this acceptable behavior from a mod?
https://postimg.org/image/uybq3tmf1/
You also didn't link to the hidden wiki, you linked to the hidden wikis contents. There is a difference, bud.
Edit: I missed the 'call' the first time I read that. My bad on that, but no, I don't as I answered in my post.
It takes steps to remedy the situation, you did not.
2 Sabremesh 2016-11-16
That's an obvious misrepresentation, because it was not a direct link to CP. Why don't you complain to Firefox that their evil browser allows people to connect to CP sites? And IBM for inventing the PC?
As long as users are warned that the hidden wiki has links to illegal sites, users can safely access the information they want to.
2 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2016-11-16
The user above is adamant that the hidden wiki is a portal for child porn, although the admins of reddit have made it clear that it is acceptable to post links to .onion addresses and the hidden wiki.
The person you replied to may as well go around advocating links to google be banned.
5 fat_osvaldo 2016-11-16
DNCLeaks has slowly gone down this path as well unfortunately.
7 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
Same mods.
4 goemon45 2016-11-16
So it is true since they're trying to derail us
1 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
I don't know.
2 goemon45 2016-11-16
It's pretty fuckin obvious
2 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
I don't do guarantees unless it is guaranteed.
You asked me if something was true, I don't know the answer to that, and neither do you. We can assume or believe it to be true, but that's not what was asked.
3 inbetweentime 2016-11-16
Indeed, I am one of the victims of that cleansing.
2 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2016-11-16
The hidden wiki is allowed to be posted, why are you framing it as some kind of portal to child porn?
Do you do the same for google links?
5 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
Are we not allowed to disagree? BTW two posts on a very severe subject, is not being 'adamant'. I was banned for spam, the first time I posted. No explanation, no attempt to sway me...
So the following isn't a portal to child porn?
From the link your buddy posted. Minus the domain names. I cut those out, because unlike you, I give a shit.
Erotic Hard Candy
.onion/ – TLZ discussion board
.onion/sciclaycams/ – Sciclay Cams
.onion/ – LLL – Image and Video down- & upload
.onion/oglb/ – Onion Girl Love Board – Private Board
.onion/ – Boy Vids 4.0
.onion/ – Girls and Boys
.onion/ – PedoEmpire
.onion/ – All Natural Spanking
.onion/ – Safe Port Forum
.onion/forum/ – BL Forum
.onion/ – FTW Image Boards
.onion/ – TLZ private forums
.onion/ – Topic Links – A CP sites link list
Erotic Jailbait
.onion/ – Some paradisebirds casey videos
But that's not CP related at all, right?
-2 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2016-11-16
Let's just make this clear; you're arguing that a link to the hidden wiki should be removed (even though it is allowed by the admins) because it contains a section which links to third party sites with deplorable content?
On those grounds, should we also ban links to google?
8 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
That is a bullshit argument. You are linking to a website that gives direct links to child porn.
You should be ashamed.
Google itself removes links to infringing content, so your argument is moot.
2 AssuredlyAThrowAway 2016-11-16
Google index links to third party sites which contain links to the exact same content as in the hidden wiki. As I said, the hidden wiki is permitted via the site wide TOS and you are using maliciously manipulative argumentative tactics to frame the hidden wiki as a child porn portal.
Shame on you.
0 CredAndBercuses 2016-11-16
Do they? Here's 685 pieces of evidence that they don't.
Onion links are in flux, and, not accessible from google without extra software. You might consider installing NetNanny if you're worried about stumbling down some obscure path from google to child porn.
0 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
those are direct links, all you need is tor. Don't be naive.
0 CredAndBercuses 2016-11-16
Actually no, a direct link is something that when you click on it, stuff happens! That's why they call it direct. In this case, your browser would try to open it and fail because you're not running tor. Unless you're a bad person, obviously.
2 trumpetspieler 2016-11-16
Now I agree with you but you need to consider the fact that it's public knowledge that the NSA pays close attention to anyone using Tor, along with the fact that the dude is essentially blowing smoke up your ass by telling you using Tor securly is a plug and play kind of thing.
But yeah, it cracks me up when I read all the people in this thread whos palms are sweating at the notion of clicking on a link to a page which consists of other links (which cannot be accessed with a normal browser), some of which may contain child porn.
And I think I'm paranoid!
1 CredAndBercuses 2016-11-16
Hey, if they weren't onion links, the prefetching setting in some browsers might cache that page without them even clicking it. Thankfully that's not what happens in this case.
2 libertyant 2016-11-16
wait so a mod from wikileaks is posting to CP? i didnt click on that thing but was it direct link to CP?
4 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
It links to a website, which has a list of .onion sites. A good lot is illegal material, and some of the illegal material is child pornography sites.
Think of it this way,
I link you to xyz.com
xyz.com has a list of direct links, some being home to child porn.
2 BubblingMonkey 2016-11-16
So that link in the post goes directly to CP? If so, thank god I did not click that. It seems very vague for someone to run into. Anyone without Dark Web knowledge would be pretty fucked.
3 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
It goes to a directory of direct links to CP.
Not a site you want to be on.
4 BubblingMonkey 2016-11-16
I don't tread near those waters. I will go to the subreddit and watch the discussions that go on involving the dark web, but I rather not go there myself.
-11 AutoModerator 2016-11-16
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
81 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
They muted me now and told me to post in the wikileaks speculation sub after pointing out their leaks are no longer authenticated. Wikileaks is compromised. Same with their Twitter.
23 backtolurkingagain 2016-11-16
Been saying that for a month now. Assange is either dead or in custody. Embassy cats twitter is a dead giveaway. Look at the last thing he favorites. Ominous, No?
15 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
I think this game of cat and mouse is over and the media posting pictures of embassy cat let's us know that the cat won and the mouse is caught.
17 backtolurkingagain 2016-11-16
Assange is the only one who controls EC, an intentional "canary in the coalmine" so to speak. No tweets. Last favorite is something about the clintons wanting him dead. Pretty obvious
9 Easier_Still 2016-11-16
Shit. EC hasn't tweeted since 15 Oct. This is getting really depressing.
5 backtolurkingagain 2016-11-16
Right
4 Lulzorr 2016-11-16
what's EC?
4 ImJustAPatsy 2016-11-16
https://twitter.com/embassycat?lang=en
embassycat twitter, an account for his cat
9 bilboskank 2016-11-16
I think the mass DDOS event was to stop a deadman switch. Happened a few days after Assange internet was cut
3 backtolurkingagain 2016-11-16
Agree
1 Alexrocksdude 2016-11-16
But it didn't effect most of Europe in the same way it crippled the US
67 pixelatedcombustion 2016-11-16
I saw a thread earlier about Julian apparently going missing and the mods not allowing conversation about it. There seems to be quite a few strange occurrences surrounding Wikileaks as of late and I hope it's not as sinister as it seems.
47 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
They muted me in all wikileaks main subs and blocked my Twitter for showing proof their new leaks are not authenticated like EVERY other email. This needs to be spread so people can force them show authentication.
17 Astronomist 2016-11-16
/r/whereisassange
4 George_Tenet 2016-11-16
Are any wikileaks mods. Mods there and on r/wikileaksspecualt io n?
4 Astronomist 2016-11-16
Only 1 mod, on /r/whereisassange, he made the mod logs public earlier today I think it is in no way compromised.
12 Italics_RS 2016-11-16
https://reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/57x782/
This happened the day that julians internet was cut.
24 rainbowdragon22 2016-11-16
They have him
14 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
The question now, is Pamela Anderson in on it? Or did they tell her he escaped and she must keep up routine so the fbi cia NSA thinks he is at the embassy??
8 Ty199 2016-11-16
Well this might sound pretty far out but I saw her in one of those satanic cult style dinner parties with human cakes etc. She's in on it and they might have sent her to completely troll the fuck out of Julian since he was obviously well aware of all this before us.
Just a random thought, who knows.
3 Saudi-Prince 2016-11-16
I bet she is into some seriously freaky stuff. Porn start turned multimillionaire with no limits and access to everything?
7 Saudi-Prince 2016-11-16
She in on it. They have some "celebrities" they use. Sean Penn helped them get El Chapo, for example. Whats his face, the basketball player was probably trying to help them get Kim Jong Un.
3 ChieferSutherland 2016-11-16
Dennis Rodman!
2 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
Have you seen bridge of spies??? It'll explain this.
3 rainbowdragon22 2016-11-16
Probably..
11 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
You have been temporarily banned from participating in /r/WikiLeaks. This ban will last for 60 days. You can still view and subscribe to /r/WikiLeaks, but you won't be able to post or comment.
If you have a question regarding your ban, you can contact the moderator team for /r/WikiLeaks by replying to this message.
Reminder from the Reddit staff: If you use another account to circumvent this subreddit ban, that will be considered a violation of the Content Policy and can result in your account being suspended from the site as a whole.
11 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
I can't even message the moderators for 72 hours
11 Mentally_Challenged 2016-11-16
/r/wikileaks2 I haven't updated it in a while because it seemed like all of this was dying down. But i will now and you are all welcome to join.
11 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
Make it a sub for hackers and it people to show authentication and double check wikileaks
10 manincheeta 2016-11-16
Dont we think that ctr was the ones who initially compromised r/wikileaks???since the mod purge ended up with ppl who we're pushing that ctr agenda? Why would they be protecting the sanctity of wikileaks?
5 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
That's the conclusion I reached. Any big dispenser of info gets taken over. I wonder how wide the tentacles rab?
3 [deleted] 2016-11-16
The mod changes there coincided with mod changes in other subs (like T_D) that ended up pushing in that direction.
4 libertyant 2016-11-16
T_D def became less investigative around the time of FBI thing but i guess it was because we split off into /pizzagate & /stopsoros & other subs for dedicated stuff
5 TheShadowGovernment 2016-11-16
r/pizzagate was only created after it became clear that discussion of the topic would no longer be welcomed in t_d post election.
2 libertyant 2016-11-16
who made that clear? was it a concentrated effort to block threads and nuke them? i live diff time zone so perhaps missed the best stuff. i mean to be fair...its not a "donald discussion" but more of "donalds opponent discussion" which i guess if reddit is super serious about not going offtrack? dunno.
8 Demican 2016-11-16
Building on this theory i contacted them to drop files, upload wasnt working so i pmd them...didnt think id get a reply..it came quick Cuck did not know what he was doing. Was able to receive a failed login on a fileshare....
2 Demican 2016-11-16
...but will add its US occupied and not domestic
1 Demican 2016-11-16
***will not give up LOQ
1 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
That's a big deal
4 Ninjakick666 2016-11-16
This has been blatantly obvious since the AMA... and pretty obvious before that.
3 trinsic-paridiom 2016-11-16
Is there any story about this in alternative news? Or is this new?
5 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
Im not sure how new but go try to post this question. They say it's already been asked but it's buried. It'll show as posted in your account but not in the sub. Their sub is compromised and everyone needs to know. Until the keys and hashes match, we can't trust them. 1600 emails missing dkim pgp when before it was on everyone.
http://www.dkim.org
2 NoKnewNamesLeft 2016-11-16
How the fuck does a sub get compromised without the mods getting the info out? Threaten them?
2 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
They'll mute you then shadow ban you then ban you for 60 days.
2 NoKnewNamesLeft 2016-11-16
Yes but if a sub is compromised then the mods of said sub have to know, right? So either the mods suddenly had a change of heart, or something happened to not make them want to warn people.
8 Crazyeyedcoconut 2016-11-16
After the Internet cut, 6 or 7 new mods were added with full permission. There lies the problem, it's definitely compromised.
2 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
Now wikileaks is trying to misconstrue how hashes and precommitment work. They also are acting like assange private response key to the pgp isn't compromised since they aren't using. Man they are digging a deeper hole. I'll feel like a big dick if this is hurting assange, but we have more evidence he isn't involved than evidence that he is. May kathulu bless us all.
2 Plz_Pm_Me_Cute_Fish 2016-11-16
Assange is gone/dead and wikileaks as you know it is gone, they are now a propaganda/distraction machine.
1 andywarhaul 2016-11-16
I posted about dkim no censoring in it
3 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
Why was I banned? I didn't break a rule.
1 jinqsi 2016-11-16
Can someone give me a link explaining this, preferably to someone who isn't raving?
3 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
What do you want to know? This thread and the stickied thread at the top explain why it's not authenticated. Why the wikileaks sub and Twitter are censoring isn't in any news article yet.
-2 [deleted] 2016-11-16
[deleted]
10 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
It'll teach people to learn to authenticate the information wikileaks releases so we don't blindly trust.
30 showmeurboobsplznthx 2016-11-16
On twitter I posted a link that teaches people how to check the hashes, keys, and dkim. Like 10 minutes later it was removed and I was blocked. I posted it again from my second account and the same thing. This morning On the wikileaks sub, I posted asking why the pgp key isn't used, the dkim is missing and their hashes don't match. It showed on my account page but not in the sub so I messaged the mods and they never responded so I messaged them again with more harsh words and they replied calling me a fucker or something close, I can copy pasta their response. They don't want people to know how to check authentication.
1 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
I don't know.
2 NoKnewNamesLeft 2016-11-16
Yes but if a sub is compromised then the mods of said sub have to know, right? So either the mods suddenly had a change of heart, or something happened to not make them want to warn people.
0 FanSciFi 2016-11-16
those are direct links, all you need is tor. Don't be naive.