Can we please calm down with the racist posts? We have people from all walks of life interested in finding the true...

249  2016-11-19 by We-think-we-are-free

And right now, we need all the help we can get. Posts about blacks and muslims will divide us, and tptb will win another battle agains the truthseekers.

Its us against them, the bankers who fund the wars. Dont forget we are all on the same tiny blue planet, so we have to work together.

They are getting ready for something big now that they got puppet trump as the mouthpiece.. stay safe

119 comments

It's not left vs. right... it's up vs. down. Or something to that effect.

This is disonfo BS (the racist posts, not your comment)

MSM is spinning lies about alternative-media being propagated by racist whites. If new people come to the sub out of curiosity and see a bunch of hate, it confirms the MSM's lies.

For those stories and comments, just downvote and move on. If there is no comments on a post, just post one comment that says "this is a troll who does not represent the views of this sub"

Dont engage these idiots. Thats what they are gunning for.

I always felt true racism was more or less based out of stupidity and would always exist as long as stupid people exist. It is an easy excuse or way to make yourself feel superior without any effort. If an increase in racism is felt by the media maybe its due to stupid people breeding like rabbits.

I agree. Fear or hatred of any kind is always born of ignorance.

[deleted]

What is this?

Only problem is when people start using political correctness to hide the truth, or label uncomfortable truths at racism.

Oh wait, that's exactly what is going on here. Nah pretty sure BLM is still a hate group and the DNC is full of pedo murderers, but okay, we will try and chill on the blatantly true rhetoric!?

Exactly. BLM is an example of ignorance.

I agree. If they were protesting jail sentencing, rather than police brutality, I would be forced to admit their point. But the fact is that the easy (NGO) money keeps 'em stupid

I think that's kinda bullshit, you're putting aside like half the people who just woke up and consider nationalism to be one of the answers to globalism. Whether or not I agree with them doesn't matter, but just discounting them because they see that race is a huge part of this one world government conspiracy is totally foolish. There is indeed a conspiracy to get rid of the white race through means of decreased birthrates, immigration, miscegeny promotion in the media, and many other means. Just because it's not important to you doesn't mean it's disinfo.

You're arguing a point I never made. Im not talking about someone having an intellectual discussion about conspiracies surrounding race (which I too believe are real,) I'm talking about people posting overtly ignorant bullshit to discredit this sub.

Im talking about comments such as one I saw recently. Someone posted a story that was not a conspiracy, so I politely asked if they posted it to the wrong sub and someone replied: [sic] "fuck ya phaggit. Get of are bords. Typical hillary shill mindless zombie."

[deleted]

What is this?

haha sounds fun

Yes.

There comes a point when you realize you have more in common with 95% of the world. For example the banks are slowly turning us to slaves to the establishments we belong to.

Great post. Rather than falling for the "divide and rule" technique, let's discuss something we can all agree on. I'm glad you brought up banking.

In testimony in front of the Senate in March, Holder, who is now the U.S. attorney general, seemed to lament the position government enforcers had found themselves in. “I am concerned that the size of some of these institutions becomes so large that it does become difficult for us to prosecute them when we are hit with indications that if we do prosecute — if we do bring a criminal charge — it will have a negative impact on the national economy, perhaps even the world economy.” - http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/04/magazine/only-one-top-banker-jail-financial-crisis.html


To be clear, the decision of whether to indict a corporation, defer prosecution, or decline altogether is not one that I, or anyone in the Criminal Division, take lightly. We are frequently on the receiving end of presentations from defense counsel, CEOs, and economists who argue that the collateral consequences of an indictment would be devastating for their client. In my conference room, over the years, I have heard sober predictions that a company or bank might fail if we indict, that innocent employees could lose their jobs, that entire industries may be affected, and even that global markets will feel the effects. Sometimes – though, let me stress, not always – these presentations are compelling. In reaching every charging decision, we must take into account the effect of an indictment on innocent employees and shareholders, just as we must take into account the nature of the crimes committed and the pervasiveness of the misconduct. I personally feel that it’s my duty to consider whether individual employees with no responsibility for, or knowledge of, misconduct committed by others in the same company are going to lose their livelihood if we indict the corporation. In large multi-national companies, the jobs of tens of thousands of employees can be at stake. And, in some cases, the health of an industry or the markets are a real factor. Those are the kinds of considerations in white collar crime cases that literally keep me up at night, and which must play a role in responsible enforcement. - http://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/assistant-attorney-general-lanny-breuer-speaks-new-york-city-bar-association


Criminal proceedings were brought against Wachovia, though not against any individual, but the case never came to court. In March 2010, Wachovia settled the biggest action brought under the US bank secrecy act, through the US district court in Miami. Now that the year's "deferred prosecution" has expired, the bank is in effect in the clear. It paid federal authorities $110m in forfeiture, for allowing transactions later proved to be connected to drug smuggling, and incurred a $50m fine for failing to monitor cash used to ship 22 tons of cocaine.

More shocking, and more important, the bank was sanctioned for failing to apply the proper anti-laundering strictures to the transfer of $378.4bn – a sum equivalent to one-third of Mexico's gross national product – into dollar accounts from so-called casas de cambio (CDCs) in Mexico, currency exchange houses with which the bank did business.

"Wachovia's blatant disregard for our banking laws gave international cocaine cartels a virtual carte blanche to finance their operations," said Jeffrey Sloman, the federal prosecutor. Yet the total fine was less than 2% of the bank's $12.3bn profit for 2009. On 24 March 2010, Wells Fargo stock traded at $30.86 – up 1% on the week of the court settlement.

The conclusion to the case was only the tip of an iceberg, demonstrating the role of the "legal" banking sector in swilling hundreds of billions of dollars – the blood money from the murderous drug trade in Mexico and other places in the world – around their global operations, now bailed out by the taxpayer. - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/apr/03/us-bank-mexico-drug-gangs


NEW YORK — British banking giant HSBC agreed to pay a record $1.92 billion settlement Tuesday after a broad investigation by U.S. federal and state authorities found the bank violated federal laws by laundering money from Mexican drug trafficking and processing banned transactions on behalf of Iran, Libya, Sudan and Burma .

The settlement, a combination of forfeitures and civil penalties, shows the London-headquartered financial powerhouse for years deliberately channeled hundreds of millions of dollars of the prohibited transactions through its U.S. arm.

"HSBC is being held accountable for stunning failures of oversight — and worse — that led the bank to permit narcotics traffickers and others to launder millions of dollars through HSBC subsidiaries, and to facilitate hundreds of millions more in transactions with sanctioned countries," said U.S. Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer in announcing the largest settlement of its kind.

"The record of dysfunction that prevailed at HSBC for many years was astonishing," said Breuer.

HSBC shares were up 0.5% to $51.82 in afternoon trading Tuesday. The shares also traded higher in London.

"Obviously, $1.9 billion is a very large number, but it's very manageable" without affecting HSBC's bottom line, said Ian Gordon, head of bank research for Investec Securities in London. "It's clearly within market expectations." - http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2012/12/11/hsbc-laundering-probe/1760351/

What racist posts are you referring to in the OP?

It's the 99% versus the 1%.

If it's up vs down then there are certain groups at the bottom being used by the elites to hold the middle class in place while the elites have their way from on top. The cold truth isn't something anyone wants.

This forum makes it possible to present ourselves without any divisive attributes since there is no pics in the profiles. Maybe we should keep it that way.

Totally agreed. No need for pics/flair/awards anything. Just pick a name and have your say. Simplicity.

Guys this is just anecdotal. But I'm Black. And literally my friends and family was just talking about this the other day. A lot of us notice that the media is using decisive language both online and in news media. People are buying into this shit and you don't know how frustrating it is to read every where I look "Blacks are so dangerous, they hate white people etc. Nobody benifits from us being divided more than the elites. Look to slavery where we were HEAVILY divided. The rich elite made a fuck ton of money. So did they in the civil rights era.

Crime is the lowest it has been in a generation. It is not on the increase, so why within the last year or so have we been seeing all this divisive rhetoric? Police are also safer then they've been in a generation (look it up). But the media is making everyone think that it's BLM and Black people in general vs the Police when it's not. They are trying to make it seem like Black people are killing more cops than ever, when they are literally at their safest levels right now. Just research for yourself. Relations were a lot worse about 20 years ago. Even 10 years ago.

I think they are planning something big, and they need to court the nation to fight and divide. We really need to come together and unite.

Don't let them make you afraid of me. I am human just as you are. From my looks, usually in a blue hoodie and headphones, you wouldn't know that I'm a college instructor and working on my dissertation. You would probably just peg me as "statistically more violent than you."

I'm kinda tipsy right now as I just got back from a mid-day mixer. But I can tell you that I notice when I go on a walk and people lock the doors as I go pass their car. Or that I listen to students argue about how Black protesters are terrorist, but not the heavily white crowds that block traffic for environmental purposes or that literally arm themselves like in Oregon, or how I legit heard someone say that America would be a better place if all the Black people left, and then defend it by saying he isn't racist (what will qualify as racist then?) as he has a Black friend and I don't really "act Black".

We have different personalities just like white people do. We bleed the same blood, and die from the same poison.

Can we just fucking get the fuck along and live life together? And focus on the ones with the real power to harm us?

We have different personalities just like white people do. We bleed the same blood, and die from the same poison.

This is wisdom.

Up until this very moment I didn't know that. TIL. /s

Thanks for this post, I know it's not easy to say these things sometimes. Solidarity!

Thank you.

You sound like a rational person, but shit like this is also part of the problem. "Don't let them make you afraid of me" Seriously, who the fuck does this. Where have you even heard anything close to this except maybe on Fox or from people in comments? The majority of the shit being pushed is that white people/cops are racist greedy fucks who will pay the lowest bidder to shoot minorities so that we can keep our property values up. And then 1 comment slips through to mainstream media that is maybe slightly critical of black people and everyone acts like that is the real problem. It's not. We have a fucking black president. Guys, get the fuck over it.

But I can tell you that I notice when I go on a walk and people lock the doors as I go pass their car. Or that I listen to students argue about how Black protesters are terrorist, but not the heavily white crowds that block traffic for environmental purposes or that literally arm themselves like in Oregon, or how I legit heard someone say that America would be a better place if all the Black people left, and then defend it by saying he isn't racist (what will qualify as racist then?) as he has a Black friend and I don't really "act Black".

Guess what, people lock their doors if anyone is walking around near their cars. It's not cuz youre black. And all the rest of the shit you said, that shit was said all over that the Oregon people are terrorists, same with the pipline protestors. Stop hearing only what you want to hear.

Ok. Im not going to argue with you (person who is most likely not black) over this.

Editing this comment because it did seem childish and without context.

Also editing because multiple people are saying similar (valid) things and because it wouldn't be worth to go through every single comment for the same answer. I have gotten into many debates on reddit over race an not one single one have gotten anywhere.

The response above is someone that was trying to invalidate what I was saying by saying it happens to everyone. I stop using my old account because when ever I tried to explain something about race it never got anywhere, and people would spam my inbox etc for me to respond.

I don't think a debate only anecdotal evidence will get anywhere. It's just you're right and I'm wrong from both sides. Now if someone wants to get into an argument over how racism isn't real, where we can look to facts and statistics and objective statements rather relying on personal experience.

I also never debate just to prove myself "right" and that is something that annoys me on reddit, that people literally will reject everything you say for the sake of having an argument and being "right", and not have any intention on changing their minds.

Speaking for myself, I lock the door all the time, regardless of the persons race walking by me. Im just not trusting of other people, especially if Im by myself and in an area Im not familiar with.

Oh!!! Good argument, bro! Whoa! Totally blew him away there! I'm glad you have been exposed as the anti-white you are so we can now disregard your previous post.

Wait.. so just wait. I upvoted your original comment, and then I upvoted this comment because I thought you both made really valid points.

Are you actually just not going to discuss your differences with this person because of their race? You said "I'm not going to argue with you (person who is most likely not black) over this."

So it's not worth explaining your point to people who aren't black? Judging from your original comment, one would think you would encourage conversation between black people and those of other races- as a way of furthering your point and helping to increase this idea of unity which you hold so highly.

This sounds really salty/racist or whatever, but you can't honestly tell me in good conscious that you will deny a debate with a person depending on their race. Surely you understand how you just made your original point invalid through that sentiment. Either that or you just don't understand what you are trying to convey.

I am white so I won't be offended if you choose to ignore my comment. I am not black, after all. Why should you expect my inferior mind to comprehend your words? It's just not logical, right?

REALLY, dude? I expected more from you. But I guess you're proving me right. Well, hopefully you come around and stop thinking in terms of your skin color. And by the way, it doesn't really mean shit to me but I'm sure it means a lot to you: I'm not white.

Edit my response above. It did come off as childish and dismissive. I apologize for that.

Apology accepted. I am confused about your edit though. Your anecdotal evidence was cancelled about by anecdotal evidence which you are right, neither can be proven. We can both agree racism is real. My point though was that racism is blamed more times than it actually should, and that also mainstream racism is nowhere near pointed towards black people.

[deleted]

So when we lock our doors because we see a white guy walking by, it's fine to say it's because you think he might try to rob you.

When we lock our doors because we see a black guy walking by, it's because we think we are superior to black people who are prone to thievery.

Got it.

I'll try harder after reading what you've written there, maybe things would be better if we all had a drink together.

Yes! Im down for drinks any night that's not one before I work.

[deleted]

What is this?

Ctr is pushing the racism hard in order to slander trump supporters.. And it's doesn't help that some of the dumber trump supporters are joining in

Ugh, I predicted a quick death for CTR

Of course someone else would just fill the void anyway

Why? They were very effective...the left will repurpose them for present and future propaganda operations.

I figured it was tied to the election

CTR/HRC supporters aren't the left, they're right-wingers and neocons masquerading around as 'progressives' because they like the way that label sounds.

Neocons came from the left to begin with.

I predicted they would die immediately after the election but it seems that /r/politics has gone back to being exclusively anti-trump shitposts.

Hmmm

Government organizations tend not to go away once created

I considered this more of a guerrilla organization

Can't let that conspiracy cash go to waste.

I thought that already happened

Kek

No way, remember they are allowed to counterfeit money to their heart's content, there'll always be money for shills, their problem is they pay the wrong kind of people. Good shills shouldn't get emotional.

I was talking about Hillary losing despite her insane campaign fund, specifically ctr

Fair enough.

Yeah man I think we're on the same squad

Are you talking about the Twitter posts?

Twitter user replaced the word "white" with "black" and got banned.

Twitter user replaced "Islam is a virus" with "Christianity is a virus" got banned.

Are these the racist posts?

No but some of the commenters on these posts dont see the big picture.

I don't think they are themselves racist, but they are only being posted to stoke tensions between two ethnic groups. Twitter may be many things, but it's highly unlikely that Twitter would be so stupid as to actually try and promote some kind of racial agenda. What's to be gained financially for them by doing so?

I'm not suggesting those posts be removed, but they are likely being submitted for ulterior reasons that have nothing to do with any conspiracy on behalf of Twitter.

Come on, you got to be joking here. Why would Twitter be pushing a racial agenda? Idk, why the fuck else would the rest of the people/businesses that we mention here push a racial agenda? "they are only being posted to stoke tensions between two ethnic groups" Yes, and that's why we post about em here.

What other people/businesses? You're not answering the question. Why would Twitter be doing this? I'm genuinely asking you. Do you think they are prejudiced against white people? I'm trying to grasp what you think Twitter has to gain by doing what you claim they are doing.

I'm sorry, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that you knew the answer but were faking ignorance. This is the /conspiracy sub, buddy. Do you know where you are? Did you even read other comments on this post alone? I'm not going to spoon-feed you.

You're not answering the question.

This was your original question:

What's to be gained financially for them by doing so?

I didn't really answer this because it's kind of a dumb question that answers itself. What's to be gained financially? Idk maybe...finances! Alongside receiving lots of funds from Saudis (who have already at least once fucked over America) Jack Dorsey is also known to heavily support Deray McCocksucker who is as close to a leader of the BLM movement as there could be. Which as we know, BLM is all about racial tension.

What other people/businesses?

You really need to ask? Reddit, Facebook, CNN, etc

Why would Twitter be doing this?

Sigh.

Do you think they are prejudiced against white people?

It's pretty obvious paying attention to any mainstream media source that everybody including white people are prejudiced against white people. Ever hear the term white guilt? Ever just browse the front page of Reddit? Every visit Facebook? Ever just speak to anyone ever? White people are lame, greedy, racist, oppressive, etc etc.

So whether through malicious reasons or just plain retardation, they definitely are prejudiced against white people. And that's not even to mention all the trending hashtags that they censor to favor whatever the identity politics movement of the week is.

I kind of answered your questions but I also kind of weaved around them because you really should just read around in this thread or this subreddit. Your original comment is shit regardless

"This is the /conspiracy sub, buddy." Yes, thanks tips, I wasn't sure where I was. Conspiracy or not, people want to hear reasoning and logic behind the theories you bring up. You ever wonder why flat-earth posts get shit on so hard around here? It's because Conspiracy is not a place where you can just say anything without evidence and expect to be taken seriously. I'm sorry you were under that misconception, but that's your problem, not ours.

"What's to be gained financially? Idk maybe...finances!"

lol okay then.. For the sake of argument, how is this making them money? Are you saying SA is paying them to be prejudiced against white people??

"Reddit, Facebook, CNN, etc" Yes, I do need to ask because you're using extremely general terms like 'people' and 'businesses'. Do you really need to ask why anyone would require more specific details than that? ... really?

"It's pretty obvious paying attention to any mainstream media source that everybody including white people are prejudiced against white people. Ever hear the term white guilt? Ever just browse the front page of Reddit? Every visit Facebook? Ever just speak to anyone ever? White people are lame, greedy, racist, oppressive, etc etc. "

lmao so wait.. you think everybody, including white people, are prejudiced against white people? Putting aside the mainstream media having an agenda, which they very well might, you then go on to mention the front page of Reddit, "Facebook" (any particular page, or all of Facebook is prejudiced?), and then ask if I have "spoken to anyone ever", as if that would somehow be proof that everyone is racist against white people? Holy fucking shit, this is exactly what I was talking about. Are you sure you're not schizophrenic? Because you are drawing wild unsubstantiated conclusions based on very limited correlative data.

The only thing here that is shit is your deductive reasoning. Provide actual details and evidence, or you come off sounding like some foaming at the mouth retard yelling at people at the bus stop.

I already told you, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that you weren't fucking retarded. I believe it was in kindergarten I learned about context clues. I already told you your questions would be answered by reading around this thread. But you really don't care about the question. You really don't care about the answer. Stop fucking pretending. That was my point, I even said it right there at the very end of my comment.

I kind of answered your questions but I also kind of weaved around them because you really should just read around in this thread or this subreddit.

I kind of answered your questions but I also kind of weaved around them because you really should just read around in this thread or this subreddit.

It's like having a discussion about quantum physics and someone comes in and wants an explanation for why 2+2 = 4. Excuse me for not having the patience to spoon feed you when again

you really should just read around in this thread or this subreddit.

Also, only a true fucking retard gets hung up over the use of everybody. Anyone who isn't autistic knows that it doesn't literally mean EVERYBODY. It doesn't literally mean 100% of people. I'm sorry that me questioning if you've ever spoken to anyone has triggered you. I know not everyone is capable of social situations.

If I come off as a foaming at the mouth retard yelling at people at the bus stop, you come off as the junkie whore trying to seduce people into fucking you for $20 and then seriously questioning them when they turn you down.

I will repeat again

I kind of answered your questions but I also kind of weaved around them because you really should just read around in this thread or this subreddit.

Learn context clues. They stress it starting in fucking Kindergarten. It would really reduce the stupid questions you have.

"into fucking you for $20 and then seriously questioning them when they turn you down."

This analogy doesn't even make sense. How? You sound really angry and yet you talk about me being 'triggered'? lol...k

"Also, only a true fucking retard gets hung up over the use of everybody. Anyone who isn't autistic knows that it doesn't literally mean EVERYBODY"

You talk about context clues and then you don't understand why your word "everybody" was taken literally when you just got done saying that "Facebook, Reddit, the media, and white people" are all prejudiced? You were just referring to all those groups as a whole, and then you're surprised when the word 'everybody' is taken the same way? ... wow, bravo man. golf clap

Either you are trying to be stupid for the sake of trolling or you honestly don't have any idea how contradictory you are being.

Putting all of that to the side for a second, you still haven't provided a single shred of evidence beyond hearsay. You just keep saying the same meaningless shit over and over again. Let me guess, now you're going to tell me to 'look it up' or 'do my own research', right? lol..

You talk about context clues and then you don't understand why your word "everybody" was taken literally when you just got done saying that "Facebook, Reddit, the media, and white people" are all prejudiced? You were just referring to all those groups as a whole, and then you're surprised when the word 'everybody' is taken the same way?

Dude, just read all the replies here to you from other people. The consensus is that you're an idiot that is asking other people to spoon-feed you information because you can't rationally think for yourself. This is why I didn't take you seriously in the first place. You're either someone who is faking ignorance or you really are that retarded - either way you are a waste of time and space.

Either you are trying to be stupid for the sake of trolling or you honestly don't have any idea how contradictory you are being.

Jesus christ, if retards like you werent a dime a dozen here on Reddit this would be infuriating. But you already threw your little sarcasm tantrum so it's hard not to judge everything you say as if written by a 12 year old.

Let me guess, now you're going to tell me to 'look it up' or 'do my own research', right? lol..

Oh those terrible phrases, how dare anybody tell you to do your research. Everything should be spoon-fed to you, you poor thing.

Now you are trying to use the comments of others to defend your argument because you have no way of doing it yourself? lol this is sad, bro..

And the only person throwing a temper tantrum here is you, as evidenced by your own extensive use of insults. Your comments reek of a highly fragile emotional state..

Can't you control yourself any better than this? If you can't carry on a debate without getting this angry, perhaps you should go find a safe space where your fee-fees won't get hurt?

A debate? Wait, is this a debate or are you "just asking questions?" You've been exposed. Give up. And now you're using the classic "I know you are but what am I!" Strategy. Very befitting for someone with the mentality of a child. Perhaps you should go back to your safe space where your sarcasm and retardation is recognized as wit. Yes, this is sad. You're arguing with multiple people here who are telling you the same thing: Fucking learn how to read and do your own research. It's not our jobs to summarize a topic for you just because you're a lazy fuck.

Can't you control yourself any better than this?

perhaps you should go find a safe space

Jesus christ your hypocrisy is amazing. "Im offended by your cursing sir, why dont you go to your safe space away from me!" Then again, a lack of self-awareness is the first requirement to be one of your kind.

You being unable to understand is not an argument.

I see this faulty reasoning all the time: "I can't think of a reason why they would do that, in conclusion they didn't do that."

And yet you haven't provided a valid argument as to why Twitter would do so. Look, I'm not a fan of Twitter/Facebook/etc, but I don't see why they would be going out of their way to be prejudiced against white people exclusively.

Can you give me a motivation as to why Twitter would risk ruining their reputation in order to push a racial agenda? From a business perspective it doesn't make sense. Unless you are suggesting they are controlled by someone with a racial agenda, in which case that would be a totally different story.

it's highly unlikely that Twitter would be so stupid as to actually try and promote some kind of racial agenda.

Wanna bet?

And it isn't just Twitter.

Okay, I'll bite, who else?

If there is a conspiracy to genocide white people in their own countries then it should be uncovered

Really? How likely is that? Who would be doing it? While we're here, What kinda white people? Are we talking North American: west European white? Or are '"latinos' included as well? You labour under these tags that were created and perpetuated to divide you. The President is mixed race. Half white - half black. But the twisted idea of ethnicity that's been imposed on America won't even let you appreciate how influential his collective ancestry has been on his life. In the same way that exposure to the collective ancestry of the world has made melting pots like the US and England the ambassadors to the world. When you really think of who you are and why you're that way, you won't think in race so much.

watch this if you actually want answers and you're not just asking rhetorically. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0T4jssO9t-0

You don't know what I know

We get it, you're a superior intellectual. For everyone else who isn't autistic. Popular culture/mainstream media has lumped anyone with white skin into the term "white people" yes even europeans if they are light-skinned enough so for some people they are capable of referring to "white people" as the way it is meant colloquially while also at the same time knowing there is a difference/the term is flawed.

But the twisted idea of ethnicity that's been imposed on America won't even let you appreciate how influential his collective ancestry has been on his life.

Oh yeah, and Obama had nothing to do with that. Absolutely NOTHING whatsoever.

lmao

You're right, it should, but you need to provide tangible evidence of it. One message being deleted while another message escapes deletion is not proof of a conspiracy to commit genocide.

This is not one instance. This is the 1636673827626th instance

Okay fine, but then please elaborate and provide examples. I'm not saying I don't believe it's possible, I'm saying I need some sort of data or evidence.

I'm not here to provide evidence for you. I'll give you one more example because I'm nice

https://imgur.com/gallery/9gOiB

Do your own research. Maybe Google Barbara Spectre for starters. It's not that hard to see it everywhere

If you want people to believe something sensational you are claiming that is as of yet unproven, yes you do need to provide evidence.

This is what you sound like:

"Hey, did you know the core of the earth is made of KFC gravy?"

"No, do you have any evidence?"

"Nah man, I'm not here to provide evidence for you. Do your own research"

Such a compelling argument, I'll no doubt go and google up a storm to see what you're talking about..

I have debated for years in the topic and the opponent always asks for more evidence no matter how clear and objective the evidence he recieves so I just don't really care anymore. If you really wanted to see most of the evidence it's on the Internet. However I have given you a couple of examples that should lead you to really question Twitter and Googles motives and why are they doing this. If I provide one example and you don't even take the time to think about it providing a thousand more examples will yield no better results.

"The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue in U.S. society, whether domestic or foreign."

-Noel Ignatiev

"If you really wanted to see most of the evidence it's on the Internet. However I have given you a couple of examples that should lead you to really question Twitter and Googles motives and why are they doing this."

Question? Yes, it has lead me to question their motives. Has it proved anything about them? No. See, you don't seem to understand the concept that the greater the claim you are making the more evidence is required to convince someone of it. You are suggesting that there is an agenda to wipe out white people en masse and yet you scoff at the idea of having to provide more evidence to support it than other more plausible, less fantastical theories. Why is that?

And making assumptions that I will not heed 'a thousand more examples' is born out of doubt on your own behalf of what you are saying. If you really believed what you were haucking, you would not give up so easily.

The quote at the end is a nice touch, but again, if you want me to think that that somehow is indicative of a massive plot to eliminate an entire race, you're going to need more compelling evidence.

Yes see this was my reasoning from the start. It does not matter if I provide you with 1 million examples you will still complain it's not enough.

https://youtu.be/85BKDj_1vVU

https://youtu.be/K0hD7IffTJs

Is this enough? How many examples do I need to provide for it to be enough? The second video provides 20 minutes of examples of my point and I'm pretty sure you're going to say it's still not enough. How many examples do you need?

You're really ignorant.

Care to explain why, or do you just throw out insults without giving a reason? Why would Twitter be doing this? Please explain

The_donald has been leaking. You're going to find this wherever his supporters go.

You're a fucking moron that still thinks "the Russians" are behind Trump and all Trump supporters are racist and you spout shit like "hate won this election reeee" Please shut the fuck up, pussy. Young people didn't vote democrat to protect social security or medicare. They voted for free stuff and because the leftist media told them too.

What's surprising is there are several people who have frequented this board for a while that are partaking in it.

Head on over to your friends running /r/isrconspiracyracist and tell them and their plants to stop

He ain't sayin everybody's racist here but some posts definitely buy into the social divides that are out there PURPOSELY TO DIVIDE US

This.

Whether you're a camel herder in Afghanistan or a redneck trucker in Alabama, somebody is exercising their control over you regardless.

You don't think that there are legitimate differences between races? Are you one of these people that believes race to be a social construct -- simply a collective illusion imagined in the minds of humans?

Really? OP mentions that regardless of who you are (not what race you are) you're being controlled by someone/something, and you jump to the conclusion that he/she doesn't believe in the concept of "race" as you personally see it? Races are the result of socio-cultural AND long-term environmental factors.

You're not understanding what OP is saying or you are twisting his words purposefully.

Posts about blacks and muslims will divide us

They're not posts about race or bigotry, or "blacks and Muslims", they're posts about the blatant hypocrisy and bias in the way that the policies of Twitter are being implemented.

This bias is not happening by accident, and you will soon be seeing similarly biased and heavy-handed censorship in places like Google, Facebook, and across the net in general.

You'll notice that this coincides with the propaganda blitz attacking so-called "fake news" websites - again, no coincidence.

This is all part of a highly coordinated assault on the First Amendment: The strategy is to use private companies - social media, search engines, ISP's, and web hosting companies - to enact heavy censorship on the public - especially in the US.

This has been the goal of certain groups for decades. They repeatedly tried - and failed - to impose censorship through legislation. Now they are circumventing the First Amendment by convincing/coercing private companies to modify and enforce their Terms of Service policies to achieve the same effect: CENSORSHIP.

Divide and Conquer? Yes, that is also one of their primary goals.

But most people dont understand that we are all the same fucking people. And then they blame obama because hes black and been prez 8 years, instead of asking why this rhetoric is being pushed so hard...

But most people dont understand that we are all the same fucking people. And then they blame obama because hes black and been prez 8 years, instead of asking why this rhetoric is being pushed so hard..

Your headline:

Can we please calm down with the racist posts?

By asserting that the posts are "racist", you're not helping. Unconsciously, you're falling right into with their Divide and Conquer trap, and adding fuel to the fire and stoking the hate further.

Think of illegal dog fights. The dogs themselves have no natural animus toward another, rather, THEIR HANDLERS force them into a situation where BOTH feel threatened, and they are taunted and goaded until they become ENRAGED - tearing one another to shreds.

Who "wins"? THE HANDLERS, not the dogs.

If you want to stop this thing, drop the "racist" bullshit and do your best to let everyone know that we are ALL being played against one another.

They're not blaming Obama because he's black, they're blaming Obama because he was the worst fucking president in many ways, and like I've never seen before in my entire life, campaigned on one set of ideas and turned around to do the exact opposite. I mean, I fucking hate Bush, but at least you know what you're getting when you elect a Bush. Millions of voters expected real change and got fucked even harder with Obama, and I hate him for that. Not cause he's black. Get your head out of your ass and stop watching television. You sound like Larry Wilmore or some asshole talking-head.

Don't you guys all believe Zuckerberg is a zionist? If he is, why would he give two fucks about racism towards Islam?? Why not create the division along some other line that doesn't end up indirectly defending what he would consider to be a sworn enemy?

Hear, hear. Real conspiracy folks know this kind of racism is used to divide and conquer. Most people are good people, regardless of race.

...except for those damn Portuguese! Sorry couldn't resist it.

I agree. It's just another means of division.

Agreed!!!

Good vs evil

What racist posts? I think you just posted this to have a "Can we stop the racism on this forum" bullshit on the front page to deter new viewers from taking us seriously...

The OP seems to be pushing MSM anti-Trump talking points fairly regularly.

What? Racism will not help people take us seriously.. imagine all the people around the world that are seeking truth were able to come together and form a network of information like facebook, the fucking criminal pedophile banksters wouldnt stand a chance against a unified world population exposing them.

But instead these religion and racial divides continue to keep us down.

Maybe you could point us to an example of one of these racist post?

It's all the neo-fascist hacks from The_Donald here to take over this sub and turn it into GLP.

Everything this sub works for is to identify corruption/anything else hidden from us. Hidden because TPTB know it's wrong. We're fighting for what's right. We're fighting for humanity. Racism has no place in this sub.

Wow i'm surprised mine and your comments were downvoted on this sub. Especially when its a widely known fact that Soros funds their protests.

It's sad how many truth seekers are cookie cutter racists

Yeah, you're right. Its obvious when the response was at 7 upvotes 2 hours ago and now its at 3. I don't give a shit about karma, but I've noticed rampant downvoting lately.

Puppet TRUMP? like hillary is better fucking CTR disinfo

Islam is not a race. Neither is Democrat or Republican.

All the more reason you shouldn't be pulling this race baiting house shit about how whites are immune to racism. The fact that tptb are pushing the agenda and you want to concern troll about a very obvious op is chilling.