WTC7evaluation project found that WTC7 couldn't have fallen due to fire, and that NIST's models were grossly incorrect. ASCE Fairbanks Engineers host Dr. Hulsey, who explains. If Trump doesn't reopen the 9/11 investigation, we'll know straight-away he's a total poseur, just like Hillary.
195 2016-11-20 by 911bodysnatchers322
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKN4qilUOfs&feature=youtu.be
More to the point, if it turns out we have to take this all the way to the world court and hold the US government accountable for the cover up, it will look bad for Trump. He has a real opportunity to open a dialogue with the public and tell us the truth. He doesn't want to do the other thing. Because too many people know now about the continuity of government, about wtc7 being demolished, about Giuliani taking away the steel and being part of the cover up; etc.
They can't hide. We may take much longer but we'll get the truth and make damn sure the public knows who helped us and who didn't.
22 comments
15 NaoTapar 2016-11-20
It's funny - people are so butthurt at the possibility trump could be a puppet
7 911bodysnatchers322 2016-11-20
I didn't vote, so I don't care either way. I'm just trying to get him to do the right thing; and to have other people join in with urging him to do the right thing.
This presidency is his to lose..or win (if I had money, I'd put it on Trump destroying everything....because his picks for his cabinet so far are absolutely awful)
Im still glad it wasn't hillary and I regret none of my choices in fighting their shitty propaganda
3 NaoTapar 2016-11-20
Yeah.. the problem is he won't do the right thing if he is indeed a puppet to the jesuit overlords / elite banking cabal, regardless of how hard you try
His choices for important positions is more proof he is probably a puppet IMO
I too am happy hillary didn't win yet fear trump could be equally as bad
2 username222 2016-11-20
Lol, i like how people start to realize that what they told them for 9/11 was bs!! Its fucking hilarious but also sad at the same time. Yes, i think we'll know what Trump is by the 1st month in office.
1 [deleted] 2016-11-20
[deleted]
3 WTCMolybdenum4753 2016-11-20
What words in that pdf describe him being under DNC direction?
-1 [deleted] 2016-11-20
[deleted]
8 rake16 2016-11-20
You are reaching. The email at best hints is that they thought Trump would be an easy defeat in the general and they were propping him up for their own purposes.
7 EyeCrush 2016-11-20
....stop spreading disinformation.
1 HorusNoon 2016-11-20
DNC or RNC... they're different sides of the same coin.
6 joe_fabeetz 2016-11-20
As a Trump voter and hopeful, I still must agree with you OP. And if he appoints 9/11 co-conspirator Rudy Giuliani to any important position that will also be a dire indication.
1 bgny 2016-11-20
What are the arguments that Giuliani is a 9/11conspirator?
1 HierophantGreen 2016-11-20
In June 1999, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani built a $13 million emergency crisis centre on the 27th floor of 7 World Trade Center.
1 perfect_pickles 2016-11-20
was prob as real as a Dr. Who set, cardboard and kitchen foil and xmas tree lights.
somebody pocketed the remaining $12,999,000
1 HierophantGreen 2016-11-20
Exactly what I thought, but they still had some work going on, putting the explosives.
1 tastypic 2016-11-20
He ordered all the debris from the tower wreckage to be destroyed immediately.
1 joe_fabeetz 2016-11-20
Accomplice might have been a better word than co-conspirator, but it stands to reason that to pull off something of that magnitude would require the complicity of the NYC mayor.
Specifically, he mobilized a group of 120 dump trucks almost immediately to haul away all the dust and steel, which would have been impossible in Manhattan unless they were already standing by ready to clean up the evidence. You're likely aware that the US Geological Survey dust samples showed extraordinarily high levels of radionuclides like barium, strontium, lithium, lanthanum, and more which indicate 9/11 was a nuclear event, and this would explain the need to attempt to rapidly remove all that rubble.
Oh yeah and the steel was expeditiously sold to China and India.
http://www.academia.edu/8679047/9-11_An_Analysis_of_the_US_Geological_Survey_Data_-_Ground_Zero-The_Nuclear_Destruction_of_the_WTC_-_William_Tahil
https://www.corbettreport.com/911-suspects-rudy-giuliani/
4 HierophantGreen 2016-11-20
What scares me is that to cover all his lies, Trump will need a major event like 9/11 attacks. This time it's Iran that is the target. His CIA boss has been criticizing the Iran deal from day one, and Netanyahu was jubiltaing when Trump won the election. No good days in perspective.
2 HorusNoon 2016-11-20
General Wesley Clark: “We’re going to take out 7 countries in 5 years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan & Iran..”
Countries that have been destabilized: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, and Somalia.
Country yet to be destabilized: Iran.
2 HorusNoon 2016-11-20
Trump's appointing of Mike Pompeo should've already told you that he's controlled opposition.
1 perfect_pickles 2016-11-20
and Purdue
1 NoelTrotsky 2016-11-20
I'm not sure I want another government investigation of 9/11. At this point I'd be happy to let the law suits against the Saudi's proceed with government support. That could be Billions for the victims and a few months wages for the Saudi's. Not going to get more justice than that from where I sit.
-5 donkiam 2016-11-20
but it did Fall to fire, every1 saw it....
6 911bodysnatchers322 2016-11-20
You imply that everyone saw it but this is wtc7, not 1 and 2... and no, you did NOT see it because there was a media blackout about 7 that lasted for several years. It wasn't until 2004 or so that people even heard about building 7 beyond people who were there. EDIT or people in the UK watching it on BBC (jane standley's fuckup--she reported solomon building fell to dust...but while it was still standing, lol)
In october of this year WTC7 evaluation finished it's main tests and their conclusions are that it was impossible for wtc7 to fall due to fire. It used advanced, but specifically realistic physics, and highly accurate modelling of the building to prove this. They showed this by making an accurate physical model and demonstrated that NIST's model was amateurish and incorrect, the connections were all wrong and their assessment deeply flawed. The ppl running wtc7evaluation are structural engineers who apparently are far more skillful than NIST; they've presented to other engineers and are moving forward into lawsuits in the world court to compel the us government to either reinvestigate or be held accountable for lying to the public and covering it up