If you want to get to the bottom of this, stop dismissing every new post as "fake". Unless you have evidence, You don't have the authority to tell us it is fake. Many here said the McCann connection was fake, but I'm still seeing damning updates on it. Be a team player or go back to researching 9/11
8 2016-12-01 by [deleted]
25 comments
7 Ty199 2016-12-01
How about everyone just share their opinion and we can conclude our own.
-5 [deleted] 2016-12-01
Sounds fine to me, it just seems like the more disturbing things are too fringe for even r/conspiracy.
4 Ty199 2016-12-01
Lots of newcomers i bet and the extreme darkness of this conspiracy will obviously cause a lot of scepticism when you throw us right into the deepend like this.
-1 [deleted] 2016-12-01
I have bad news for you then, because this is all deepend. If you can't handle it leave it to us. Stop parroting information and do real research. Find source documents, find debunking proof. Something unverified is not necessarily fake and much of our staple material on Pizzagate was formerly unverified. Don't discount it.
3 fyrefox45 2016-12-01
Literally nothing on pizzagate is verified, that's its entire problem. There's lots of extremely weird mainly surrounding podesta and alefantes.. But nothing close to damning.
3 Armaedus 2016-12-01
this
2 Ty199 2016-12-01
Staple on pizzagate not verified? I thought it started with Podesta's emails ?
Also why do you have this aggressive tone man, were all just here trying to figure out whats going on.
0 [deleted] 2016-12-01
Previously unverified. I distinctly remember people here saying the McCann suspect pictures were shopped before an article from years ago surfaced with the exact pictures.
1 BigPharmaSucks 2016-12-01
It was pretty well concluded that it was a team of two larpers that posted that on /r/pizzagate a few weeks ago. You can research the ridiculous claims yourself in the /r/pizzagate archives if you want to come to your own conclusions.
-1 [deleted] 2016-12-01
No I would like you to stop parroting claims back to me and show me some critical thought that led you to that conclusion.
2 BigPharmaSucks 2016-12-01
It was 2 guys that had the most popular thread on /r/pizzagate for 2 days. They started cracking when being pressured by the community for real evidence, kept postponing proof, talked about sharing 2gb of encrypted files that they supposedly stole from inside some pizza shop they claimed was being used for child trafficking. Constantly changed their story and backtracked, avoiding answering any real questions. Then they said the cloned the pizza shops hard drives and were going to share the torrent of the encrypted hard drive. Over the course of two days they led the community on a wild goose chase, then apparently posted real CP. I'm not saying you have to believe it's fake, but everyone, including the the most prominent investigators/researchers came to the logical conclusion that they were either shills trying to get the subreddit shut down, or larpers just leading everyone on. Feel free to find the post here in the pizzagate archives and come to your own conclusions. But I watched it all unfold over two days, and personally believe it was fake as well.
Pizzagate archives: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1428510/6894321
2 [deleted] 2016-12-01
larpers, I buy, but trying to get the sub shutdown? How exactly? All I have been saying is don't simply dismiss somebody coming to you with unverified evidence. I didn't say it was real either. But an operator takes all 911 calls seriously
1 [deleted] 2016-12-01
[deleted]
0 [deleted] 2016-12-01
That's a poor strategy. Consider the liability on their end.
2 BigPharmaSucks 2016-12-01
Poor strategy for reddit, semi-regular behavior for some 4chan veterans.
1 BigPharmaSucks 2016-12-01
Here is a link to a small discussion at voat about the topic.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1423742
I have found a few of the threads in the archive if you want me to upload them for you.
4 [deleted] 2016-12-01
[deleted]
2 babaroga73 2016-12-01
This post is made to confuse you of which one is fake...
2 agentf90 2016-12-01
definitely fake user
1 [deleted] 2016-12-01
that's as effective as me saying you are a fake user. What is your defense?
0 agentf90 2016-12-01
none. i am a fake user. lol -- you think i post onlne with my real identify?
1 Ty199 2016-12-01
You're just trolling people all over the place eh
2 agentf90 2016-12-01
just you.
1 Ninjakick666 2016-12-01
Talking about pizzagate without listening to Ted Gunderson first? Amature hour... or else you'd realize 9/11 is part of the pizzagate conspiracy.
1 PortOfDenver 2016-12-01
Bullshit. Burden of proof is on the claimant. Despite what mods & Cointelpro will tell you.
1 [deleted] 2016-12-01
Im not making a claim. Im saying keep your mind open. If You call something fake that means You are making the claim.
1 Sabremesh 2016-12-01
The fake tag will remain until someone can provide ACTUAL evidence that the Podestas knew Sir Clement Freud, or that the Podestas were staying in his villa in Praia da Luz, or that they were (5000 kilometres from home) in Southern Portugal when Madeleine McCann was declared missing. Put your researching boots on and get to work.
1 [deleted] 2016-12-01
that's as effective as me saying you are a fake user. What is your defense?
0 [deleted] 2016-12-01
That's a poor strategy. Consider the liability on their end.