Absolutely NOT

If you allow investigations on the .01% of something being true, say bye bye to your rights and privacy.

Investigations should be based upon very real and positive evidence. Not hunches, rumors, guesses or .01%.

.01% is 1/100 right? So you reckon it's acceptable to investigate 99 innocent people to bust 1 guilty? Fuck that. If you believe otherwise, then please open your doors so I can investigate your home. You've got nothing to hide right?

Alleged.

Doesn't matter what the crime is.

Investigating innocent people based on this idea of .01% is unacceptable regardless of what you're looking for.

saying you don't care about privacy because you've got nothing to hide, is like saying you don't care about freedom of speech because you have nothing to say.

-ed snowden

That's my point. The last line where I used italics was a mockery of that idea of having nothing to hide.

I agree with your thoughts that a .01% chance doesn't warrant an investigation. The things that can't be ignored and should cause an investigation are the artwork that these people surround themselves with. It's disgusting stuff and a lot of it has been removed from CPPP since these things came to light. I'm not trying to control art or the chance to express oneself through it, but just passing it off as trying to be edgy doesn't sit well with Pizzagaters.

0.01% is one in 10 000.

And yes, you are right.

.01, not 0.01

Main reason I asked if it was 1/100 was to check if op just threw out a random number or actually intended to say 1/100, so then I could ramble on about 99 innocent people for 1 guilty.

uh... 0.01% and .01% are the same thing lol. 1 in 10000. But ok, I get you.

Has a victim come forward? Has any physical evidence of a crime been found? Are there any witnesses? You would need at least one to of these things to start an investigation and as far as I know there are none of these.

Didn't really answer any of the question, just replied with low effort copy+paste responses. The U.S. Judicial system works on evidence of some form, there is none here at this time so unless that changes an investigation would be nothing more than a witch hunt. If that's the type of justice you're seeking, you've never learned from past mistakes of the same type nor do you understand the system.

Is there any precedent to start an investigation based on circumstantial evidence?

What is this magical circumstantial evidence that's not evidence of a crime?

The obvious use of code is a good start. They're speaking nonsense in reference to pizza. What's the reason for that? Should be a pretty simple explanation and yet no one has come forward to explain it and it is essentially what sparked this whole controversy.

So your whole basis for an investigation would be because of nonsense, which can only be a code, a code that can only be about child sex ring. That's not circumstantial, that's insanity.

Your twisting my words. The basis for an investigation as I've outlined it would be use of code words, that could be easily explained, but aren't.

No, I'm being logical about your argument. You think nonsense is some sort of code, that code being about a child sex ring. Your argument is based on a cascade of assumptions. I'm all for a good conspiracy theory but those are usually based on false extrapolations of coincidental information and circumstantial evidence. Your basis for all of this is on some certainty of something without any form of evidence, even circumstantial or coincidental.

The code words are just the beginning of the coincidences. Factor in the financial ties, the rides on the Lolita express, Hillary receiving updates on a convicted child trafficker (Silsby) and then employing her, the list goes on and on and on. More than enough to warrant an investigation in my opinion. The most damning evidence is the fact that the people involved refuse to address what is arguably one of the most deplorable things you could be accused of, and then you have people like you that say it's not even worth looking into. Do you have kids?

Your grotesque view of the judicial system is the problem here.

Explain to me how there's no precedent for circumstantial evidence to warrant an investigation

Cathy O'Brian.

E: https://i.sli.mg/bojyeE.png still from Conspiracy of Silence

It's been going on for weeks now with zero proof of any wrongdoing.

How long does a salacious, frothy witch-hunt need to continue failing?

Why not link any number of other unrelated child porn stories? You can't point at B and say "this is proof of A!".

How does it validate harassing pizza joints (that Democrats just so happen to like)?

Why aren't you witch-hunters pointing at Republicans at all? Fishy...

Yeah, I'm confused. Sure.

Huh, sounds like UFO or Bigfoot evidence as well....

Then you stopped reading after only a few paragraphs of research. This fucking this is ridiculously deep and if all this shit is coincidence then someone needs to buy a lottery ticket.

No, my point was that if ONE, ONE UFO or Bigfoot sighting is real, the dam breaks loose. Just like in this case.

Unfortunately, this is probably not true because of the magnitude of the people involved.

Realistically, the first solid piece of evidence is going to lead to the discoverers apparent suicide, the information will get muddled by CTR filling the Internet with false debunks, and the discoverer will be made out to be a terrorist and will you look at the time, it's the Super Bowl.

Not everyone investigating is American or cares about football. This thing is worldwide.

I don't think someone is safe just because they are not American. As you said, it's world wide.

The lead witness in the Jeffrey Epstein case swears she had sex with Prince William.

These fuckers own the planet.

I don't think they're outside of it if they're not american, I'm just saying your point about football being the great american distraction isn't worldwide.

If it isn't one form of football it's another lol

My point being that most people in first world countries are either insulated from it or distracted by other things.

Tea and crumpets or croissants and complaining, depending on what country.

kidding obviously

You're right, culture can be distracting.

But from where I am, thanksgiving didn't slow down or stop the spreading of this information. The magnitude of this information is what caring people are going to continue to look into.

0.01% is one in 10 000.

And yes, you are right.

saying you don't care about privacy because you've got nothing to hide, is like saying you don't care about freedom of speech because you have nothing to say.

-ed snowden

I agree with your thoughts that a .01% chance doesn't warrant an investigation. The things that can't be ignored and should cause an investigation are the artwork that these people surround themselves with. It's disgusting stuff and a lot of it has been removed from CPPP since these things came to light. I'm not trying to control art or the chance to express oneself through it, but just passing it off as trying to be edgy doesn't sit well with Pizzagaters.

Why not link any number of other unrelated child porn stories? You can't point at B and say "this is proof of A!".