In order to convince the deniers that pizzagate is plausible, you must first show that similar events have been exposed before. I have an example of this working in a default subreddit.

53  2016-12-07 by [deleted]

[deleted]

8 comments

I've found the most luck by starting with Epstein and Laura silsby

All of Dave McGowan's work in Programmed to Kill is a great reference.

"... show that similar events have been exposed before ..."

Direct them here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1cm0t3/original_research_the_mountain_of_evidence_for_a/

You should be spreading news about that, because it is proven. However, discrediting yourself by mentioning pizzagate undermines all the good you could have done.

Good info but no links to pizza.

Another good tactic is to first talk about the links with pedophilia and then ask the skeptics if they would let their child play ping pong after school at Comet Pizza or have Alefantis babysit their child for one night. I've used this tactic and the skeptics make complete idiots out of themselves. Some of them can't admit that even without direct smoking gun evidence, there's enough circumstantial evidence to have some doubts about Comet Pizza.

Tell people about the FBI logo's, Alefantis' profile pic and Instagram account, Majestic Ape joking about sex with boys, art that's done by artists with links to child abuse, Alefantis being friends with Tony Podesta who has pics of naked teenagers in his house and other art that's related to child abuse and Tony being good friends with convicted pedophile Dennis Hastert.

Stress that these things in themselves mean and prove nothing, but then ask the skeptics if they would let Alefantis babysit their children for one night.

Then sit back and watch the skeptics make complete idiots out of themselves.