Hillary Clinton threw the election.

3  2016-12-19 by OsBohsAndHoes

Just wondering, because I haven't seen it discussed literally whatsoever. Is it at all possible that Hillary Clinton purposely threw this election? Before you dismiss, doesn't it seem odd that a career politician and so many people we thought were aligned with her, slipped up and "exposed" themselves so often leading up to the election? I mean, as someone who became very interested in politics for the first time this past election cycle and tried to look at everything objectively, it seems like almost everything she did from the primaries to election day worked to alienate, disenfranchise, or build a false sense of security in enough people to allow Trump to win (and possibly carry out her/the elites agenda) much more easily than she ever could have in office.

Disclaimer: I'm not saying I believe these things to be true, I just think it's odd that no one has contemplated this possibility before. What I'm looking for is a discussion on the possibility. This subreddit seems to have been flooded with people that are seemingly obsessed with these DNC conspiracy theories that are lacking on hard evidence. Well, what if it's all a rouse to get the conspiracy theorists (those of us who would actually put the time and effort into exposing something like this) looking the wrong way? Meanwhile you have a public that either blindly supports Trump (and is seemingly unwilling to question anything he does), aggressively opposes Trump (who are made out to be "liberal babies" who are just whining because their side did not win), or those that are so fed up with all of this that they've stopped paying attention a long time ago. Isn't that exactly what these elitists would want? A public that has given up, or is too busy fighting with each other that they don't see what's really going on? Anyway, I'm relatively new to all this and I figured I'd let you all weigh in. Peace & Blessin's

29 comments

11  no1113 2016-12-19

Hubris, bro. Hubris. After sooo many years of getting away with the absolute worst, most despicable criminality, I can tell you that the last thing they thought they’d get bitten in the ass and taken down by was an email scandal.

Again, hubris.

2  OsBohsAndHoes 2016-12-19

Yeah, I mean that seems to be the general consensus (and the most logical explanation) as to what happened (to everyone except those in the DNC who's heads are too far up their own asses in thinking that they don't need to change). I am looking to entertain the idea, and discuss, the possibility that it was not hubris on the part of Hillary and the DNC! Rather, that perhaps this illusion of hubris was all part of the plan.

3  no1113 2016-12-19

Part of what plan? To have Clinton throw the election? Why? To put Donald Trump in? Why? So that the public could put its guard down thinking "The people finally won!" or whatever tf and then TPTB can swoop in and use DT to put in even worse legislation than Clinton would have? I mean...I don't understand why TPTB would have wanted Clinton not to get in.

And no...I didn't actually read what you posted under your OP. Gonna do that now. Maybe you answered all this there. :)

EDIT: Just read everything. First and foremost, let me say that I don't like Trump, but I really don't like Clinton - so I'm glad she didn't get in. That said, I think TPTB might have been able to control the masses better w/Clinton in because she could have put everyone to sleep a bit more. Trump - though he might raise racial tensions and cause a civil war in the US - might also cause people to "gun the fuck up" a lot more and stir some vinegar in folks enough to not stand for the establishment's b.s. Clinton would have taken those guns - which TPTB are absolutely salivating to make happen.

I think TPTB absolutely wanted Clinton to get in, and the leaks fucked up their whole plan and they're still scrambling hard as hell right now to STILL somehow get that bitch in office actually (smfh).

2  elnegroik 2016-12-19

Further to this -She got away with the part she played in 9/11 to such a degree, she couldn't resist the humble brag in her campaign logo.

2  Noxton 2016-12-19

I think it's possible that whoever is in the white house will preside over the biggest economic crash the world has ever seen. In this regard, I suppose it's possible Hillary potentially threw the election.

2  samsongoliath16 2016-12-19

Ya i love Trump. But thought about her deep down just not really wanting it anymore. Like a subliminal thought in her head

2  chickenshitmchammers 2016-12-19

Yeah, i can totally see it. In fact, i don't know how i didn't see it. They propped Trump in the media from the beginning. Then they rigged the primaries so Hillary had to be against him. But then she literally had the worst presidential campaign of all time. Before the election people were saying the Republican party was over. Now it looks like the dems are over. At least for another 8 years.

1  Putin_loves_cats 2016-12-19

lol, people are starting to think about my drunken (albeit tongue in chick) thoughts, that Hillary was a Trump plant... This is golden.... You're not the first, nor methinks, the last....

1  OsBohsAndHoes 2016-12-19

lol I would argue the opposite actually. Hillary (or some higher power) is still running the show and donald is still the plant. See Hillary has been championing certain issues that don't necessarily make it easy for her to carry out her true objectives. All these lobbyists/ceo's/1% who she would have been catering to all while trying to put up this facade to the public that she was not, well donald can just blatently get away with it apparently. He doesn't need to hide it, he can just appoint these people to his cabinet and cut out all the bullshit of trying to make it seem as though they care about the common people.

1  Putin_loves_cats 2016-12-19

We're all pawns on the grand chess board..... It's funny how many here are back tracking, about yea... soo.. it's because this (now Hilary is a Trump plant - but I thought Trump was a Clinton plant?)!! You people... Thinking 2D.... TPTB are laughing. I have some insight on this, and frankly, I'm laughing myself.... Take that how you want...

2  ghettomotels 2016-12-19

They're both "plants". The debates made that obvious. Obviously Clinton & Trump are good friends. The elites decided to troll everyone selecting Drumpfft with this odd election.

Now it's time to see if the Man of Drumpfft will rise to the pulpit.

1  thebabyseagull 2016-12-19

Yeah ,I think someone is pulling the strings too.

I think what's just happened is one faction of the"illumanti" has overthrown another.

I think it comes down to the NSA vs the CIA,NSA being for trump.

The CIA has run the show for yeasrs but I think the NSA has outgrew them in terms of power and has now taken control.

1  BeckerLoR 2016-12-19

South Park was onto something

1  rainbowdragon22 2016-12-19

they've been preparing the masses for trump for years...

1  ghettomotels 2016-12-19

Trump was the "Pied Piper" candidate they wanted to run against.

The Greatest Show on Earth.

vaudeville2016

0  ghettomotels 2016-12-19

The popular/electoral split was planned long before the election. Both Trump & Hillary knew. Things could be interesting soon. Once Americans know some of these electors are community college freshmen, it may be time to revisit the electoral college & change the system.

1  Qwaszx93 2016-12-19

College freshmen? Please expand bc that is absurd

1  Onivivo 2016-12-19

kids from wealthy money, and just in general big pockets.

1  ghettomotels 2016-12-19

You can google it.

The system is a joke. Pure vaudeville.

-1  Mrexreturns 2016-12-19

Electoral college will soon declare Trump the LOSER and whip up a mass revolution and civil war.

2  OsBohsAndHoes 2016-12-19

That would be wild. I doubt it tho, for a number of reasons: a, I don't think enough electoral college voters have the balls to not vote for donald, and b, if my theory were correct, having the electoral college voters deviate from the vote would go against their plan of disenfranchising the masses.

1  Mrexreturns 2016-12-19

This is not Lincolin's America where the electoral college is well known and open; The electoral college today is filled with degenerates, nobodies and yahoos that nobody can seem to name or know where they are from and they are electing presidents in a black room.

And there is an unprecedented pressure from intelligence agencies like the CIA and FBI to force the electoral college into electing Hillary. In short words, the intelligence agencies blackmail these yahoos and nobodies to declare trump the loser and Hillary the winner.

And when it happens; Prepare for civil war.

1  OsBohsAndHoes 2016-12-19

Just curious, are you a supporter of donald?

2  Mrexreturns 2016-12-19

I do not support all elites, regardless if it was obama, hillary, trump or putin, because they are all controlled by the same hand.

1  OsBohsAndHoes 2016-12-19

Gotcha. Well I think you're a bit too hopeful in your doomsday predictions (no offense). If this is being orchestrated from above, then wouldn't the elites want to disenfranchise us, make us lose hope, and have us fighting against each other rather than for each other? I suppose a war would do good in ridding the common folk in mass, but war has gotten too messy nowadays; it's only reserved to places we (most Americans) don't feel any sort of attachment to (the middle east)

1  Mrexreturns 2016-12-19

War is exactly what they want. Order out of Chaos.

1  ghettomotels 2016-12-19

If that happens, expect the alt-right to have their own rapture.

1  Mrexreturns 2016-12-19

Whip up the Alt-Right, Whip Up the Liberals and SJWs, instant revolution and civil war, massive purges and world war will follow.

1  OsBohsAndHoes 2016-12-19

It seems more likely to me (especially now so that the EC vote went smoothly) that now is when we enter the period of submission. The right is smug and happy and unwilling to question donald or his motives, and the left has lost their hope/will to fight any longer. Which, would be in line with my theory as donald is able to effortlessly appoint heads of special interest groups to departments which prevented them from implementing their plans to further cripple the masses and increase the wealth gap.

2  OsBohsAndHoes 2016-12-19

Yeah, I mean that seems to be the general consensus (and the most logical explanation) as to what happened (to everyone except those in the DNC who's heads are too far up their own asses in thinking that they don't need to change). I am looking to entertain the idea, and discuss, the possibility that it was not hubris on the part of Hillary and the DNC! Rather, that perhaps this illusion of hubris was all part of the plan.

2  elnegroik 2016-12-19

Further to this -She got away with the part she played in 9/11 to such a degree, she couldn't resist the humble brag in her campaign logo.