Kim Dotcom says he has 2TB of New Zealand government data that will bring that government to its knees in 2017. Leakers are heroes who are starting to rule the world.
He isn't necessarily a liar so much as someone that did something that didn't work out as he intended. No one wants to tell the truth of their mistakes. That isn't a criminal, its a tolerable man, subjected to intolerable things. With a moral conscious and regret for his mistakes. So pardon him for having the conscious mind that you yourself seem to neglect. Parading about law as if it were infoulable while allowing the real criminals to cheat lie and steal in your own protection. Id rather be a criminal than evil itself, and the iron curtain that protects it-
That is a personal judgement; I don't believe that he needed to be addressed in the way he was; He has a family and family life that didn't need to be subjected to public ridicule, an armed intrusion, nor an alienated search. I would truthfully not wish this on any "criminal" nor human being that is a known non aggressive party.
If his kids were home by example, they will be permanently victimized and considerably jaded to trust LEO's in active duty;
People have consciousness and are inherently vulnerable to long lasting psychological damages in these actions. Public embarrassment, and being defunded so you are without ability to pursuit an active defense team by example seems rather below our country to impose on an international citizen.
I may be too morally minded by our planets standards -
Between the black and white of law; There is a moral responsibility in which law does not address; The more it persists, the more we die as a race. Sure data and actions can be in fact illegal; I am not arguing that. But if your a team of soldiers with high power automatic weapons actively engaging a home where fragile minds are consistently aware of your being. What makes you any better?
It is a sad world sometimes. I don't believe that two wrongs meet a right in any regard, nor that this qualifies as an act of valiance we should consider was tried and true. If anything it just makes my own world that much sadder that people can be so inconsiderate.
I don't blame them; Its just something that should have been avoided entirely. There were work around's in that regard.
There always is...
His model while used illegally, wasn't a faceted bracket in criminology. It was a standard business model no different then one-drive.
Google is just an empire that can handle the situation because they were government approved. Not like microsoft and google aren't also being used to transfer illegal data. Not like yahoo and reddit itself don't host illegal data. Or facebook. Seems rather biased to attack only one company isn't it. Or are we to believe they simply don't. Because I assure you respectively they factually do - Hundreds if not thousands of times a day.
From what I read mega complied with a vast majority of desist letters.
This wasn't a man who gave them the finger. When companies requested to have materials removed he complied. They are assessing the ease of people / users rehosting, as him being complicit in mishandling his own company.
That does not go on to say i've read everything about the case, but from what I have it greatly goes against your main points.
Again. Personal attacks.
I truly pity your moral compass. You need to do some self reflecting. Every user on reddit is watching you a grown person, act like an irrational child. That is how you represent yourself. A child throwing a tantrum. I truly hope you take sometime to get to know yourself. Because today and now. You truly are rather unlikable.
When companies requested to have materials removed he complied
He should not be allowing any materials to be accessed when uploaded until being verified as not being copyrighted or without having verified tht it is in fact the copyright holder uploading them himself. Otherwise the excuse" of "feigning ignorance" or "stupidity" not good enough.
if you own a company that host freely content for user to post what they wish and start noticing it is being misused greatly to infringecopyright. Than that is enough information to start withholding instant broadcast of these download or hosting links untilcopyright or independent materials can be verified.
period
there's no excuse to play dumb for 14 let alone 12 let alone 10 let alone 8
So your telling me reddit independantly scans every post I place prior to posting it online. That isn't how this works. You should talk to mods about how many times a day they personally remove illegal materials.
You see we can't monitor the human psyche in advance.
If your proving to charge that any company is doing this by comparison, you would be wrong. Because again. All companies host data without simply looking into it. It is only when it is brought to their attention that it is removed. You can't argue that point. Because that is exactly how it works I am afraid-
wat u talking about? i just answered you sad ass question completely logically there's no reason this idiot had to keep allowing instant rebroadcast of copyrighted material bad bye.
Boo hoo This guy says im irrational bcoz i don't idiolize someone who played a game of "let's see much how i can get away with whilst it looking like an accident" FOH
Your anger is laughable. If users rehost content it isn't up to him.
He leases content space. He can't monitor 3.4 million users. Hence the need for desist letters, that he complied with. It would be different if he didn't comply with them. But he did; Every time. Sorry that your upset that people are inherently good at heart. I can see that not being your own personal philosophy; Judging by your anger. You should take more time to practice peace in your own life, and learn basic forgiveness. Your demons are strong. Good day.
He never gave anyone anything. Look your wanting to fight but hold no validity in your arguments, and your childish attitude isn't helping you win points in the world. He has a large staff. The workload is impossible to meet. For any team. Furthermore you still haven't addressed why every .com can do it accept him. Hence reddit mods finding sick shit and illegal data everyday. Should the owners of reddit's families be raided and guns be stuck in their innocent childrens faces. This was never about morality. But morally, any person with common sense could argue that as taking things too far. Your obviously ok with it. So find a book on the art of taoism, and learn basic composure;
You have no self reasoning; It is anger channeled by ignorance. I forgive you; But you need to learn more about basic human nature, and being kind to your fellow man. My guess is your were abused alot as a kid. And I really am sorry for that. Take care friend.
If you want to explain why google reddit youtube and facebook can do it, but kim couldn't; Please be my guest. Because they do it everyday. The main answer is. You can't because factually kim was subjected to intolerant things. Which means I just won my argument until you can gain your composure and explain it.
Good luck, and sorry again for your impositions.
He shouldn't be hosting and rebroadcasting content which
is copyrighted or illegal if he can't control his businessendeavour than he is liable
I'm not childish
Literally what else is there to say
Answer my question why does this idiot allow the HOST and REBROADCAST of illegal content
It's not a discussion board
Google does not host anything except on youtube
Google drive is intended for documents and personal backup not for sharing files
It is not immediately Public
Here's a hint
It's called megaupload.com
Gee i wonder where they got the idea they could just upload anything
Poor weasel can't disseminate a discussion board from a file hostingwebsite
Mega upload sole purpose was to upload pirated materials there's literally nothing else it was used for
Google Drive is extremely different first off it's a cloud intended for external storage backup
Teddir is a discussion board doesn't host content just links
Facboo is a scial media/ discussion board doesn't allow copyrighted material
Toggaf Upload is a website in which files can be hosted at almost any size and be rebroadcast and downloaded by anyone
there's no privacy it's not secure and it had little to no moderation.
Keep defending a loser who's motto was "let's see how much i can get away with without looking guilty"
So you should petition the reddit admins to having their homes raided and their children forced into gunpoint because users here break the law everyday. You should throw in this request to imgur, and facebook. Youtube. Or you know. Maybe go after those that are actually breaking the law by stealing and exchanging the content. If they did that from the first place, and cracked down on it; There wouldn't be a problem. So Kim isn't the problem. He was a business owner. Just like the people that run reddit; Or facebook, and youtube. The only difference was he was a small time player in an otherwise larger game. Hence the brassiness in it all.
so don't play devils advocate in an otherwise black and white situation. Kim was treated unfairly; While other "approved assets" are doing the exact same thing; Everyday; Without remorse.
Again. Now your bolding your key points. Stop holding in the guilt and learn to forgive. This isn't for today and now; But someday you truly will thank me. Good day friend. You have officially lost your argument.
They don't break the law this is a discussion site not a file hosting site neither is faceboo youtube does very well due dilligence on it's copyright even someone with your mental disorder can see that
reddit; Or facebook, and youtube
HAHAHAHHAAHAH
none of these are file hosting websites
Youtub at best is video streaming website which doesn't allow you to upload anything without approval what are you actually smoking?
Reddit is a discussion board it does not host any files
it's main purpose is to discuss topics usually with external links as supporting evidence
It's main purpose is to view videos that are either copyright less or copyright obtained for free.
Faceboo is a social media/ discussion website they don't host files other than personal images they dissalow copyrighted material it's main purpose is to communicate and interact with other people
where is your argument
Or are you actually mentally disordered because if you are i feel bad for you but there is a huge difference now for the finale
MEGAUPLOAD was a file sharing website that allowed you to upload any files from a huge range of sizes and videos to the internet for immediate download without any pre approval
I well know the difference in their platforms abilities. You do know what hosting data is right. Because they all host data. Illegal data at times, and there truly is no differences. I wouldn't strive to attack my intellect either. Factually your avoiding my argument. Because you have lost your own argument. So pester someone else with your initiations of faulted criticism. My position will and has not changed. Your essential reasoning is to steer around solid points. Which is not a win; It's a tactic 'not to lose'.
Food for thought.
Now if you can "Just step aside for me to enjoy the sun".
they don't host any files i said files stop deflecting and trying to weasel out of the little hole you dug up
They host a framework for people to interact and discuss
Faceboo only hosts images texts and some videos
Copyright is reported by it's user base as it's main function isn't a file sharing website
It also has links to some news articles externally
Reddit only literally hosts texts and external links
It is a discussion board
oh yeah and some subreddit images ahahah
call the police the subreddit images are illegall
Illegal data at times
The instances vary so vastly differently because
1. none of the above are pimarily a file sharing download site which rebroadcasts it's content without moderation or censorship.
all of the above have a different purpose other than sharing large amounts of data instantly without moderation or censorhsip
All of the above strive and have moderation to an accepted standard as it's main purpose is not to distribute Files on an instant rebroadcasted without moderation basis.
Therefore if "illegal data" is found the above aren't nearly criticized as much as they actually have a function other than sharing vast amounts of data without moderation in an instant rebroadcasted fashion
Poor weasel
Begging for photosynthesis :(
why would you even tell me about your endavours regarding photosynthesis is it getting to you that much
If you talk about reddit alone yes. that isn't the point. The point is that the corporations didn't like competition so they axed out the little guy. They openly use both facebook and youtube to host illegal data. Which does host content. I don't see zukerberg in a raid with a gun in his face, and compared to his Psychological studies on unsuspecting users. That literally violate their trust and authorities, without knowledge those crimes are far more serious.
So ya. Mega is a host. Just like them. Why aren't the others held accountable. The answer is Biased law and corporations.
SO I stand by my statment again. Kim Got treated far too harshly and it was an abuse of his civil rights. We aren't supposed to do these things to others. Its more criminal than anything he'd done in the first place.
they openly use both facebook and youtube to host illegal data
OMG what illegal data are you talking about???????
Mega is a host
"of filesharing" on an instant rebroadcasting manner
Just like them
no nothing like them they host personal images and discussionad copyright free data when copyrighted data comes up on youtube it is taken down or monetized
Just saying things doesn't make it true
But i'm going to keep saying i DON'T care about that neckbeard kim noshclong
because i can see how much it is making you passionate about your lover bad bye
and please if you suffer from mental disorder take your meds otherwise you may believe merely saying things makes them true.
Any sites that allow user data without a copyright is a file sharing site. That is public knowledge- Hence why you can download users pictures by pressing save...
downloading photos of female minors off of Facebook, digitally editing an image of genitals into them and then reposting the edited pictures onto the girls’ Facebook profiles
It wasn't even real child pornography
last year the social network partnered up with Microsoft to crack down on child pornography through the use of Microsoft’s PhotoDNA software, which can search through billions of images and identify which of them may be inappropriate.
We scan every photo that is uploaded to the site using PhotoDNA to ensure that this illicit material can’t be distributed and we report all instances of exploitative content to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. We’ve built complex technical systems that either block the creation of this content, including in private groups, or flag it for quick review by our team of investigations professionals.
We’ve worked with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and the New York State Attorney General’s Office in the U.S., as well as the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre in the U.K., to use known databases of child exploitive material to improve our detection and bring those responsible to justice
However, we’re constantly refining and improving our systems and processes and building upon our relationships with NCMEC and law enforcement agencies specializing in child protection to create an even safer space.
if an account is suspected of involvement in “illicit activity,” such as child pornography, the site investigates “associated objects (groups, Pages, and images etc.) and associates.” In addition, all accounts that have been disabled, removed from the site or found to be involved in child pornography activity are preserved in order to aid law enforcement officials should an investigation ensue. The site often brings up such cases with both domestic and international law enforcement to further help in apprehending and convicting those behind the activity.
So not only did they work with microsoft to develop technology that would detect pornography they used databses to match against child pornography and worked with law enforcement directly to bring offenders to justice.
"GEE i wonder why law enforcement is going so easy on them"
Maby becaus ethere actively working with the police and preserving the information so offenders are caught
Facebook shut down six of seven suspicious groups the newspaper pointed out this week, based on a study in Libya by Armament Research Services (ARES) and Times reporting on similar groups in Syria, Iraq and Yemen.
Monika Bickert, a former federal prosecutor responsible for developing and enforcing Facebook’s content standards, said one of the operations pointed out by the Times displayed pictures and discussed the weapons but did not offer them for sale, thus surviving the ban.
B B B B B B B B b b b b b b but
You don't get it to do you facebook isn't hosting illegal Files
Users are abusing an interactive based software to advertise their illicit products
facebook is not responsible for people abusing their platform to advertise their products
Their illegal product is not distributed through facebook
When facebook is aware of the problem it takes down the groups
Facebook does not host Weapons on it's (that's impossible)
It hosts images of weapons on it's servers.
it does not sell weapons thought it's servers (that's impossible)
you can't distribute drugs through facebook
You have to use physichal methods such as being in person
Facebook doesn't host children in it's servers or rehome them
(that would be impossible) (children cannot be converted to digital format and stored in facebookservers)
This is third party advertisement of illegal activity
This isn't hosting illegal copyrighted data on a instant rebroadcasting manner
How can't you see the difference
Illegal data is when you have information about somewhat you are not allowed to have or was gained in an unlawful manner this is third party advertisement of illegal activities in the physichal manner being used on a social media platform.
There's no direct culpability.
an example of illegal data would be a whistleblower website hosting classified information
That's is a true example of illegal data as it would show there was a clear intent to distribute illegal data.
I'm actually starting to think you may have a mental disorder as you can't see the difference between putting illegal things on to a website that hosts them for distribution and somebody advertising illegal things using images or text based discussion
The illegal pornography beckoned dedicated software just to detect it and you're saying there is any sort of parellel
betwen that and megafuckboy.cum
Face it if megafuckboy.com couldn't handle hosting directly all that illegal copyrighted fileload than it should have diminshed it's operating size there's no excuses when dealing directly with the the questioned illegal products.
I still say go after the users that uploaded them?
Why didn't you guys just do that? Now they are just rampantly at large again. While another man took the heat for the bulk of them...
Can you prove that kims intent was to make this specifically for criminals to use. Or was his intent a pure an honest intent to allow for file sharing? Honest questions...
no his intent was to profit from knowingly allowing copyrighted material to directly be allowed to be hosted by him directly.
There's no excuse he should have contacted the police himself if he didn't want to look as if he was knowingly ignoring all the copyright infringement so he could legally profit from his business.
because he wasn't monitoring what was going onto his network in a meaningful way as his whole network was based on file sharing how don't you comprehend that?
Yes but he openly violates severe crimes such as manipulating the human psyche itself. If anything he is a super villan in comparrison to kim in that context alone. Monitoring search results. Attempting to sway your conscious; Possession of classified materials, stolen property, aiding drug cartels, user dealer relations... CP... The list is staggering... But lets go after the copyrights infringement?
he's not forcing you to use faceboo
or consume your news from faceboo what type of idiot uses faceboo for news
Stolen property? he's not forcing you to use facebook
aiding drug cartels? not intentionally
again if you manafacture an ar-15 it's not your fault if a lunatic uses it for a mass shooting
now if you hand it over to him knowing damn well he's going to do it that's a slightly different thing as there are laws against selling weapons to people with disorders etc.
if there is classified materials on facebook
i'm sure he's likely to endeavour to remove them as soon as possible however there's no way of knowing what classified materials are beforehand and they dont host files just text or images so no PDFS
CP
we've already spoke about how he's combatted this as much as he can
You don't get it do you
CHINGCHONG littledong is directly hosting (enabling) the rebroadcast of illegal files he has the ability to delete them or not rebroadcast them of he'd really like to that's the while purpose of his platform file sharing he should more control over his own platform
Faceboo isn't mainly or intended to be a filesharing platform it's for social interaction and communication with text and images
how don't you get that
I seriously don't care
you're just gonna say the same thing again until u get so agitated and off youself and i don't wanna be complicit in that so don't blame me.
and you're misrepresenting again he is hosting conversations and interactions between people on a social media website
he does all he can to combat it all culpability is now questionable
as law enforcement authorities are aware that the main purpose of his platform is to interact socially with other humans.
I.e. It actually has a purpose other than bootlegging copyrighted materials
factually he removes "that data" as quick as possible
I may; I am working on getting to HRC at the moment for destroying evidence in a federal investigation as well as embarrassing our country. Maybe someday I too will run for president. :)
I never said i don't believe there are way bigger criminals to target and when i first learnt of his story i laughed in my head at the thought of him facing long term jailtime
Also just because one is called a social network....
And the other is a "file sharing site". Does not negate the criminal complexities involved. Factually many members abuse both networks, and while they attemp to comply the very bulk of the services will always be out manned unless the users themselves are employees. Sure it is easier to shut them down from the top. But calling them apples and oranges does not free them from the cunundrum that they dont share the same purpose because they are packaging them differently.
Now you on the other hand. have completely insulted me several times factually. I don't appreciate your aggression's. So maybe you feel I am psychologically damaged because I don't understand the full principals that you inherently are addressing but it give's you not an excuse to persecute me in your anger.
Factually I've been quite clear about my position. I myself am a humanitarian that cares for people. I probably don't belong in this world because between the black and the white there is a grey area where morality used to exist. Truly it troubles me that you have seemed to have forgotten that. But I don't call you names because your doing it to me.
I already told you I don't know every detail of the case, but I have told you some pretty compelling arguments that do need addressing. Such as why does zuckerberg get off the hook when he's hosted criminal networks and CP related materials; Yet Kim seems to be a hyper criminal and take responsibility for his users actions. They are both the same business model at a fundamental level. "hey" come share things! Share with your friends and Upload to our servers your personal data so others can see it...
80% of the audio content and videos are plagurized that users seem to share on their social feeds everyday. There is every type of illegal material on both networks. So Why does one get a free pass and the other walks free...
That is what pisses me off about this. The users are the criminals. Period. The moment they choose to host illegal materials that is who law should punish. And these networks always will be run over hence the materials being there for years without intervention. So to say that they both advertise to share and for users to connect they are no different in that regard. Just named differently.
Also note I have more respect for you for your last message. So please continue to engage in the conversation but shit man please lighten up for your own sake. Your going to give yourself a heart attack; And by all means I am just a curious person talking semantics with you.
So truly I'd like to know why one can have a server and host illegal data. But the other can't without the full bulk of law ramming its wang down its throats? Is that not a valid question?
I mean facebook itself is saturated with crimes? How is it truly any better at a fundamental level?
facebook doesn't host illegal files pure and simple and when they do theirs dedicated algorithms to combat them
Megafuckboy.com continually ignored multiple hundreds of thousands of Illegal files hosted directly on his servers there's a simple and pretty huge difference.
Keep trying to argue and sound intelligent if you want i don't care
you can't change facts with faux or even real intelligence.
So your saying they are both complicit but one is a state assisted party so they get a free pass for the same offences. Along with most other sites... Not just facebook. But all servers in the nation hosting illegal data? I don't host data myself. It's not my intent. But those that do on mass scale should all be treated equally. No excuse for that.
no one is profiting mainly from illegal files being hosted on it's site
The other is profiting from users interacting with each other on it's site
One doesn't notify the authorities when widespready copyright infringement occurs
the other notifies the authorities when a minor instance of copyright infringement occurs
In the first case the police are in no position to say that he didn't knowingly allow this copyright infringement to occur
as they havn't been allowed to investigate and see what is possible or reasonable
In the other case the police cannot be in a position to say that every effort to obey the law whilst operatin it's business has not been followed.
There's a very simple and huge difference
Keep being mad please i don't care you're just sayin the same thing and then turning it into a plot for the authorities to somehow profit from faceboo or whatever your insinuating.
Which is hardly the case it's a case of businesses working with authorities when questionsable acitivities occur within and around their business
The difference with megafuckboy wing no schlong is that he was directly hosting the illegal material and rebroadcasting it
and he was aware of it everyone was aware of it. he should have provided a back door for authorities to access the material in order to remove it if it violated any laws
Cue
"B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b but that's censorship"
While I am beginning to see the differences fundamentally why is zuckerberg given a free pass being in possession of illegal files in instances where possession is a crime. He is profiting, and possession of stolen property is still an offence? Drop kim. I'd like to know about this other issue entirely...
they openly use both facebook and youtube to host illegal data
OMG what illegal data are you talking about???????
Mega is a host
"of filesharing" on an instant rebroadcasting manner
Just like them
no nothing like them they host personal images and discussionad copyright free data when copyrighted data comes up on youtube it is taken down or monetized
Just saying things doesn't make it true
But i'm going to keep saying i DON'T care about that neckbeard kim noshclong
because i can see how much it is making you passionate about your lover bad bye
and please if you suffer from mental disorder take your meds otherwise you may believe merely saying things makes them true.
I am not saying he didn't know his servers were saturated. but I find it hard to imagine that he willfully was hoping to be a pirates playground. (When he created it); People aren't inherently evil; They make mistakes and I think he can even assist the world if he rededicated himself. Side note, We were all young once, and thought we were invincible-
I just hate when law punishes you more then you deserve; That is the difference between justice, and the gross abuse of the system itself. (I'd certainly be happy to hear more details that make him out to be a super pirate), from what i've read I myself am on the fence. (I doubt any 'one' individual would ever know the full story);
I mean his servers hold masses of information which are literally endless. (I myself would hate myself to be the guys having to do the forensics on that gig). Like Ok so this is what we found:
a googleplex of data. lol. Christ that would take years to sort through. I suppose that is the point though. He provided a service for the many, (originally with a maybe financially minded but rather curious intent), and at this point he is ultimately to blame for everyone else's including his own fuckery. I don't think he himself knows exactly everything that he has been storing;
but as far as the situation goes. I just hope he pulls through it.
I am a bit of a humanitarian, and rather hope all people will thrive in this world. It's far too difficult to fail, and the situation we face every day only make it that much more difficult to get yourself on the right track. So If he is the devil to you in that regard... (in my opinion), I've seen far worse-
From someone that's made constant mistakes in my own youth;
I can only say thirteen years is a long time to have learned the error of your ways. As so being an eccentric person is always likely when having the luxury. I expect to hear even more failures in his future then we have now, but to wager he hasn't already achieved great things by this time; Would be a great devaluing of the services and capacity of growth he may still be able to achieve should the world allow it.
The story I best look forward to hearing is the one involving his family. Being a father myself I know if anything has taught me to press on; It was the fact I am no longer doing it for myself.
In that extent alone from one being to another, I'd promote giving him a second chance. (a final chance maybe). Yet a chance all the same.
Make peace with your enemies, find patience through your hardships; And forgive the elements of life you best regret.
That's why they say forgiveness is divine. Essentially it is;
Ego is a testament to the challenges we have faced, and already overcome. You will get past this, and when you do; That is when a true smile will form; and it won't matter anymore; I am sorry your compelled by it today; But I believe in everyone's ability to find closure. Both kims, and your own.
It isn't my place to conclude anything in this; but you will always have my advice :)
Do as the animals do, and make today your bitch ;)
I think in 3 days you may see a 6.0 in south japan. Technically I aim for mega quakes. Hence the january prediction.
Essentially when people say earthquakes happen everyday they are right. However the real threatening ones are rare. So I focus on pointing those earthquakes out, so I can prove my thesis.
If you can show your on top of the largest events you can work the data down into the small ones. But to prove the theory you have to wait until you have undeniable evidence (to move the work itself forward). and So we wait :)
You too, Spend it with your family. If your in newyork be safe - I've a bad feeling about an attack there on the 28th. I've already reported it myself; However this year is looking gloomy; So stay safe through newyears, and keep your eyes open ya. (maybe avoid crowds altogether).
I'd rather like to see an insider post, on your obvious agenda minded activities. (no offense), but your views must be triggered by something, of variety; One that this forum could for-once-and-all-appreciate.
Hear Ye! Hear Ye! The grand high arbiter, he who decides what is true and what is not has spoken! He also decrees that those who deign to disagree with his dictates are aligned with all that is evil. That is all.
He made similar threats last time there was a general election in NZ, hes just got beef with the government and trying to get out of being deported from NZ
He was the one that inferred he had Hillary's deleted emails, and at the last moment instead posted that they should ask the NSA to run an xKeyscore search for them.
"I heard from a reliable source that the Podesta emails seem like cotton candy compared to the amount of disgusting dishonesty the National government will see leaked at the next election."
I'm sure, I was just joking. I don't know much about new Zealand politics, just that the drug policy is a nightmare. I've got an old elementary school friend who moved the about 15 years ago, he loves the landscape at least, we don't talk too much about the politics.
Scenario: An authentic whIstleblower or leaker appears who is a real threat (unlike our current celebrity leakers). Dishes out alarming 9/11 info, definitive FBI links to false flags, etc.
So this time, the Feds are truly terrified. They decide to set up the leaker as a patsy. They plant false info leading to "release of terrorists" or some such set-up mechanism. The real leaker leaks the fake info. Chain reaction. Then a dirty bomb goes off in LAX Airport.
Suddenly a real whistleblower is framed -- which is what intel agencies like the FBI do best. Classic pretext for the "war on whistleblowers" to expand.
But this hasn't happened yet.
If you believe this subreddit, nobody in their right mind is skeptical about leakers or whistleblowers. They couldn't be fake. They couldn't be planted. They couldn't be used. They couldn't be deceived themselves. They couldn't be limited hangouts. Stop thinking, just believe, stop being cautious of traps.
So why hasn't the "Whistleblower Causes Mass-Casualties" false flag been done yet?
Either you believe that intelligence factions use false flags, or you don't. If they had no use for fake whistleblowers, they would get serious. If they weren't currently benefitting, they would stage a false flag. But that is not happening yet. Not yet. Not finished getting mileage from the celebrities yet.
Wasn't this the guy who posted on Twitter along the lines of "nah Julian Assange is safe he's just too busy to confirm he's alive cos he's working on the Nov 4 super leak" which never happened
This guy is just building his Twitter following, possibly trying to con some teenagers into buying a bunch of nothing. Every Intel agency is way up his ass, no way he's an active hacker
But then they release it and the politicians just tell the media to tell the public its a lie and that only thekr website can be trusted for "nonfake" news. I honestly dont see any change. Not because the hackers arent effective, they are, but because the mass majority has become too despondent to care. I honestly feel like people dont care about how corrupt their politicians are anymore, nor do they care about the fact that the fence is tightening around us every day.
Jesus, New Zealand!? Can't he do better than that? I'm sure they got their own corruption issues who doesn't but I'm more interested in mass-murdering type governments being exposed. Unless of course pizza is a thing there too.
NZ is part of the 5 eyes and was part of Echelon which was the original global surveillance carried out by the US. NZ is also a tax haven. There's a lot of possible dirt in NZ.
125 comments
103 dfawoehuio 2016-12-22
I'll just add this to his pile of BS tweets that never came true.
7 ElagabalustheMighty 2016-12-22
Yeah. He got some legitimacy with the early mention of Wikileaks having Clinton information, but threw it all away with showboating.
Stupid move, made me think maybe he was trying to take attention away from something at the time.
2 KurtSTi 2016-12-22
haha this is so true
91 bukowski12 2016-12-22
Kiwileaks
4 redditeditard 2016-12-22
Bwahahahahaha
27 [deleted] 2016-12-22
[deleted]
31 [deleted] 2016-12-22
[deleted]
20 InaccurateLinguist 2016-12-22
lol @ sides
2 SokarRostau 2016-12-22
Spook Wars: Revenge of the Redi.
9 [deleted] 2016-12-22
[deleted]
13 blacksoulo 2016-12-22
it's not even his real last name!
6 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
I rather like kim.
He isn't necessarily a liar so much as someone that did something that didn't work out as he intended. No one wants to tell the truth of their mistakes. That isn't a criminal, its a tolerable man, subjected to intolerable things. With a moral conscious and regret for his mistakes. So pardon him for having the conscious mind that you yourself seem to neglect. Parading about law as if it were infoulable while allowing the real criminals to cheat lie and steal in your own protection. Id rather be a criminal than evil itself, and the iron curtain that protects it-
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
what intolerable things? FOH
2 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
That is a personal judgement; I don't believe that he needed to be addressed in the way he was; He has a family and family life that didn't need to be subjected to public ridicule, an armed intrusion, nor an alienated search. I would truthfully not wish this on any "criminal" nor human being that is a known non aggressive party.
If his kids were home by example, they will be permanently victimized and considerably jaded to trust LEO's in active duty;
People have consciousness and are inherently vulnerable to long lasting psychological damages in these actions. Public embarrassment, and being defunded so you are without ability to pursuit an active defense team by example seems rather below our country to impose on an international citizen.
I may be too morally minded by our planets standards - Between the black and white of law; There is a moral responsibility in which law does not address; The more it persists, the more we die as a race. Sure data and actions can be in fact illegal; I am not arguing that. But if your a team of soldiers with high power automatic weapons actively engaging a home where fragile minds are consistently aware of your being. What makes you any better?
It is a sad world sometimes. I don't believe that two wrongs meet a right in any regard, nor that this qualifies as an act of valiance we should consider was tried and true. If anything it just makes my own world that much sadder that people can be so inconsiderate.
I don't blame them; Its just something that should have been avoided entirely. There were work around's in that regard. There always is...
1 thesarl 2016-12-22
Great post.
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
TY :)
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
i don't care in any way shape or form she should of worked in weight watchers if he didnt want this
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
Yes he wanted guns in his childrens faces for hosting other peoples data. Obviously this gave you a chill.
You have the ability to be better today then you were the day before. With a line like your last. I'd suggest it-
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
it didn't giv me a chill i don't giv a shit don't monopolize illegally and don't get fu**ked with simple as that
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
Yes, you are angry-
His model while used illegally, wasn't a faceted bracket in criminology. It was a standard business model no different then one-drive. Google is just an empire that can handle the situation because they were government approved. Not like microsoft and google aren't also being used to transfer illegal data. Not like yahoo and reddit itself don't host illegal data. Or facebook. Seems rather biased to attack only one company isn't it. Or are we to believe they simply don't. Because I assure you respectively they factually do - Hundreds if not thousands of times a day.
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
i'm not angry
they made no attempts to ever curb this behavious there was no consorted effort to cease the copyright infringment
:( poor weasel (not fatboy)
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
From what I read mega complied with a vast majority of desist letters.
This wasn't a man who gave them the finger. When companies requested to have materials removed he complied. They are assessing the ease of people / users rehosting, as him being complicit in mishandling his own company.
That does not go on to say i've read everything about the case, but from what I have it greatly goes against your main points.
Again. Personal attacks. I truly pity your moral compass. You need to do some self reflecting. Every user on reddit is watching you a grown person, act like an irrational child. That is how you represent yourself. A child throwing a tantrum. I truly hope you take sometime to get to know yourself. Because today and now. You truly are rather unlikable.
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
He should not be allowing any materials to be accessed when uploaded until being verified as not being copyrighted or without having verified tht it is in fact the copyright holder uploading them himself. Otherwise the excuse" of "feigning ignorance" or "stupidity" not good enough.
if you own a company that host freely content for user to post what they wish and start noticing it is being misused greatly to infringe copyright. Than that is enough information to start withholding instant broadcast of these download or hosting links until copyright or independent materials can be verified.
period
there's no excuse to play dumb for 14 let alone 12 let alone 10 let alone 8
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
So your telling me reddit independantly scans every post I place prior to posting it online. That isn't how this works. You should talk to mods about how many times a day they personally remove illegal materials.
You see we can't monitor the human psyche in advance. If your proving to charge that any company is doing this by comparison, you would be wrong. Because again. All companies host data without simply looking into it. It is only when it is brought to their attention that it is removed. You can't argue that point. Because that is exactly how it works I am afraid-
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
wat u talking about? i just answered you sad ass question completely logically there's no reason this idiot had to keep allowing instant rebroadcast of copyrighted material bad bye.
Boo hoo This guy says im irrational bcoz i don't idiolize someone who played a game of "let's see much how i can get away with whilst it looking like an accident" FOH
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
Your anger is laughable. If users rehost content it isn't up to him.
He leases content space. He can't monitor 3.4 million users. Hence the need for desist letters, that he complied with. It would be different if he didn't comply with them. But he did; Every time. Sorry that your upset that people are inherently good at heart. I can see that not being your own personal philosophy; Judging by your anger. You should take more time to practice peace in your own life, and learn basic forgiveness. Your demons are strong. Good day.
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
i'm not angry i don't care you do (care)
your anger is HILLarious
Then he needs to hire more staff
DUHH
it's called business
you have to be held accountable for your business endeavours
ALBERT EINSTEIN OPPENHEIMER
B B B but he's a hero he gave us free porn and illegal movies
HAHAHHA
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
He never gave anyone anything. Look your wanting to fight but hold no validity in your arguments, and your childish attitude isn't helping you win points in the world. He has a large staff. The workload is impossible to meet. For any team. Furthermore you still haven't addressed why every .com can do it accept him. Hence reddit mods finding sick shit and illegal data everyday. Should the owners of reddit's families be raided and guns be stuck in their innocent childrens faces. This was never about morality. But morally, any person with common sense could argue that as taking things too far. Your obviously ok with it. So find a book on the art of taoism, and learn basic composure; You have no self reasoning; It is anger channeled by ignorance. I forgive you; But you need to learn more about basic human nature, and being kind to your fellow man. My guess is your were abused alot as a kid. And I really am sorry for that. Take care friend.
If you want to explain why google reddit youtube and facebook can do it, but kim couldn't; Please be my guest. Because they do it everyday. The main answer is. You can't because factually kim was subjected to intolerant things. Which means I just won my argument until you can gain your composure and explain it. Good luck, and sorry again for your impositions.
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
He shouldn't be hosting and rebroadcasting content which is copyrighted or illegal if he can't control his business endeavour than he is liable
I'm not childish
Literally what else is there to say
Answer my question why does this idiot allow the HOST and REBROADCAST of illegal content
It's not a discussion board
Google does not host anything except on youtube
Google drive is intended for documents and personal backup not for sharing files
It is not immediately Public
Here's a hint
It's called megaupload.com
Gee i wonder where they got the idea they could just upload anything
Poor weasel can't disseminate a discussion board from a file hosting website
Mega upload sole purpose was to upload pirated materials there's literally nothing else it was used for
Google Drive is extremely different first off it's a cloud intended for external storage backup
Teddir is a discussion board doesn't host content just links
Facboo is a scial media/ discussion board doesn't allow copyrighted material
Toggaf Upload is a website in which files can be hosted at almost any size and be rebroadcast and downloaded by anyone there's no privacy it's not secure and it had little to no moderation.
Keep defending a loser who's motto was "let's see how much i can get away with without looking guilty"
HAHAHHA
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
So you should petition the reddit admins to having their homes raided and their children forced into gunpoint because users here break the law everyday. You should throw in this request to imgur, and facebook. Youtube. Or you know. Maybe go after those that are actually breaking the law by stealing and exchanging the content. If they did that from the first place, and cracked down on it; There wouldn't be a problem. So Kim isn't the problem. He was a business owner. Just like the people that run reddit; Or facebook, and youtube. The only difference was he was a small time player in an otherwise larger game. Hence the brassiness in it all.
so don't play devils advocate in an otherwise black and white situation. Kim was treated unfairly; While other "approved assets" are doing the exact same thing; Everyday; Without remorse.
Again. Now your bolding your key points. Stop holding in the guilt and learn to forgive. This isn't for today and now; But someday you truly will thank me. Good day friend. You have officially lost your argument.
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
They don't break the law this is a discussion site not a file hosting site neither is faceboo youtube does very well due dilligence on it's copyright even someone with your mental disorder can see that
HAHAHAHHAAHAH
none of these are file hosting websites
Youtub at best is video streaming website which doesn't allow you to upload anything without approval what are you actually smoking?
Reddit is a discussion board it does not host any files it's main purpose is to discuss topics usually with external links as supporting evidence
It's main purpose is to view videos that are either copyright less or copyright obtained for free.
Faceboo is a social media/ discussion website they don't host files other than personal images they dissalow copyrighted material it's main purpose is to communicate and interact with other people
where is your argument
Or are you actually mentally disordered because if you are i feel bad for you but there is a huge difference now for the finale
MEGAUPLOAD was a file sharing website that allowed you to upload any files from a huge range of sizes and videos to the internet for immediate download without any pre approval
do you see the difference?????????
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
I well know the difference in their platforms abilities. You do know what hosting data is right. Because they all host data. Illegal data at times, and there truly is no differences. I wouldn't strive to attack my intellect either. Factually your avoiding my argument. Because you have lost your own argument. So pester someone else with your initiations of faulted criticism. My position will and has not changed. Your essential reasoning is to steer around solid points. Which is not a win; It's a tactic 'not to lose'.
Food for thought.
Now if you can "Just step aside for me to enjoy the sun".
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
they don't host any files i said files stop deflecting and trying to weasel out of the little hole you dug up
They host a framework for people to interact and discuss Faceboo only hosts images texts and some videos Copyright is reported by it's user base as it's main function isn't a file sharing website It also has links to some news articles externally
Reddit only literally hosts texts and external links It is a discussion board
oh yeah and some subreddit images ahahah
call the police the subreddit images are illegall
The instances vary so vastly differently because 1. none of the above are pimarily a file sharing download site which rebroadcasts it's content without moderation or censorship.
all of the above have a different purpose other than sharing large amounts of data instantly without moderation or censorhsip
All of the above strive and have moderation to an accepted standard as it's main purpose is not to distribute Files on an instant rebroadcasted without moderation basis. Therefore if "illegal data" is found the above aren't nearly criticized as much as they actually have a function other than sharing vast amounts of data without moderation in an instant rebroadcasted fashion
Poor weasel
Begging for photosynthesis :(
why would you even tell me about your endavours regarding photosynthesis is it getting to you that much
I swear i didn't mean it
to aggitate you out of your mind
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
If you talk about reddit alone yes. that isn't the point. The point is that the corporations didn't like competition so they axed out the little guy. They openly use both facebook and youtube to host illegal data. Which does host content. I don't see zukerberg in a raid with a gun in his face, and compared to his Psychological studies on unsuspecting users. That literally violate their trust and authorities, without knowledge those crimes are far more serious.
So ya. Mega is a host. Just like them. Why aren't the others held accountable. The answer is Biased law and corporations.
SO I stand by my statment again. Kim Got treated far too harshly and it was an abuse of his civil rights. We aren't supposed to do these things to others. Its more criminal than anything he'd done in the first place.
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
OMG what illegal data are you talking about???????
"of filesharing" on an instant rebroadcasting manner
no nothing like them they host personal images and discussionad copyright free data when copyrighted data comes up on youtube it is taken down or monetized
Just saying things doesn't make it true
But i'm going to keep saying i DON'T care about that neckbeard kim noshclong
because i can see how much it is making you passionate about your lover bad bye
and please if you suffer from mental disorder take your meds otherwise you may believe merely saying things makes them true.
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
http://www.ibtimes.com/illegal-weapons-trade-facebook-hosting-online-weapons-bazaars-despite-ban-machine-2351080
https://www.ananova.com/free-hosting-sites-and-illegal-child-rehoming/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/07/facebook-child-porn_n_1496530.html
http://grapevine.is/news/2014/07/20/police-monitoring-drug-sales-on-facebook/
Don't see a gun in their childrens faces...
Damn movies seem so important.
Any sites that allow user data without a copyright is a file sharing site. That is public knowledge- Hence why you can download users pictures by pressing save...
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
It wasn't even real child pornography
"GEE i wonder why law enforcement is going so easy on them"
Maby becaus ethere actively working with the police and preserving the information so offenders are caught
B B B B B B B B b b b b b b but
You don't get it to do you facebook isn't hosting illegal Files
Users are abusing an interactive based software to advertise their illicit products facebook is not responsible for people abusing their platform to advertise their products Their illegal product is not distributed through facebook When facebook is aware of the problem it takes down the groups Facebook does not host Weapons on it's (that's impossible) It hosts images of weapons on it's servers. it does not sell weapons thought it's servers (that's impossible)
you can't distribute drugs through facebook You have to use physichal methods such as being in person
Facebook doesn't host children in it's servers or rehome them (that would be impossible) (children cannot be converted to digital format and stored in facebookservers)
This is third party advertisement of illegal activity This isn't hosting illegal copyrighted data on a instant rebroadcasting manner
How can't you see the difference Illegal data is when you have information about somewhat you are not allowed to have or was gained in an unlawful manner this is third party advertisement of illegal activities in the physichal manner being used on a social media platform.
There's no direct culpability.
an example of illegal data would be a whistleblower website hosting classified information That's is a true example of illegal data as it would show there was a clear intent to distribute illegal data.
I'm actually starting to think you may have a mental disorder as you can't see the difference between putting illegal things on to a website that hosts them for distribution and somebody advertising illegal things using images or text based discussion
The illegal pornography beckoned dedicated software just to detect it and you're saying there is any sort of parellel betwen that and megafuckboy.cum
Face it if megafuckboy.com couldn't handle hosting directly all that illegal copyrighted fileload than it should have diminshed it's operating size there's no excuses when dealing directly with the the questioned illegal products.
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
I still say go after the users that uploaded them?
Why didn't you guys just do that? Now they are just rampantly at large again. While another man took the heat for the bulk of them...
Can you prove that kims intent was to make this specifically for criminals to use. Or was his intent a pure an honest intent to allow for file sharing? Honest questions...
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
no his intent was to profit from knowingly allowing copyrighted material to directly be allowed to be hosted by him directly.
There's no excuse he should have contacted the police himself if he didn't want to look as if he was knowingly ignoring all the copyright infringement so he could legally profit from his business.
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
How does complying with cease and desist letters show he was being evasive to the infringement?
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
because he wasn't monitoring what was going onto his network in a meaningful way as his whole network was based on file sharing how don't you comprehend that?
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
Yes but he openly violates severe crimes such as manipulating the human psyche itself. If anything he is a super villan in comparrison to kim in that context alone. Monitoring search results. Attempting to sway your conscious; Possession of classified materials, stolen property, aiding drug cartels, user dealer relations... CP... The list is staggering... But lets go after the copyrights infringement?
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
who?
he's not forcing you to use faceboo or consume your news from faceboo what type of idiot uses faceboo for news
Stolen property? he's not forcing you to use facebook aiding drug cartels? not intentionally again if you manafacture an ar-15 it's not your fault if a lunatic uses it for a mass shooting now if you hand it over to him knowing damn well he's going to do it that's a slightly different thing as there are laws against selling weapons to people with disorders etc.
if there is classified materials on facebook i'm sure he's likely to endeavour to remove them as soon as possible however there's no way of knowing what classified materials are beforehand and they dont host files just text or images so no PDFS CP
we've already spoke about how he's combatted this as much as he can
You don't get it do you
CHINGCHONG littledong is directly hosting (enabling) the rebroadcast of illegal files he has the ability to delete them or not rebroadcast them of he'd really like to that's the while purpose of his platform file sharing he should more control over his own platform
Faceboo isn't mainly or intended to be a filesharing platform it's for social interaction and communication with text and images
how don't you get that
I seriously don't care
you're just gonna say the same thing again until u get so agitated and off youself and i don't wanna be complicit in that so don't blame me.
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
I haven't lost my patience at all. Factually he is still hosting that data- I'd make a stink out of he himself aswell;
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
go report him you very important creature
and you're misrepresenting again he is hosting conversations and interactions between people on a social media website
he does all he can to combat it all culpability is now questionable as law enforcement authorities are aware that the main purpose of his platform is to interact socially with other humans.
I.e. It actually has a purpose other than bootlegging copyrighted materials
factually he removes "that data" as quick as possible
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
I may; I am working on getting to HRC at the moment for destroying evidence in a federal investigation as well as embarrassing our country. Maybe someday I too will run for president. :)
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
Good for you
Wowhee good luck with that :)
You're very "special"
i'm sure that will win a few sympathy votes
the first mentally incongruent president
Transmental for pres
but i'm not sure anyone can embarass your shamefull country as much as adolf drumpf himself
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
The last line was a bit of a joke.
Truly I believe I respect you /u/DerFuhrerFuckFaggles
You just don't realize it.
Learn to love-
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
Sieg heil to one to all
none of that love ish
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
That is the fundamental aspect of love my friend.
Veritas, Aquetias; above all things~
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
Sieg heil
no love ish tho
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
I don't understand your meaning?
But as one human to another; I do in fact love you.
:)
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
look i'll give you credit
I never said i don't believe there are way bigger criminals to target and when i first learnt of his story i laughed in my head at the thought of him facing long term jailtime
But it's funny as fuck so i don't care
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
Also just because one is called a social network....
And the other is a "file sharing site". Does not negate the criminal complexities involved. Factually many members abuse both networks, and while they attemp to comply the very bulk of the services will always be out manned unless the users themselves are employees. Sure it is easier to shut them down from the top. But calling them apples and oranges does not free them from the cunundrum that they dont share the same purpose because they are packaging them differently.
Now you on the other hand. have completely insulted me several times factually. I don't appreciate your aggression's. So maybe you feel I am psychologically damaged because I don't understand the full principals that you inherently are addressing but it give's you not an excuse to persecute me in your anger.
Factually I've been quite clear about my position. I myself am a humanitarian that cares for people. I probably don't belong in this world because between the black and the white there is a grey area where morality used to exist. Truly it troubles me that you have seemed to have forgotten that. But I don't call you names because your doing it to me.
I already told you I don't know every detail of the case, but I have told you some pretty compelling arguments that do need addressing. Such as why does zuckerberg get off the hook when he's hosted criminal networks and CP related materials; Yet Kim seems to be a hyper criminal and take responsibility for his users actions. They are both the same business model at a fundamental level. "hey" come share things! Share with your friends and Upload to our servers your personal data so others can see it...
80% of the audio content and videos are plagurized that users seem to share on their social feeds everyday. There is every type of illegal material on both networks. So Why does one get a free pass and the other walks free...
That is what pisses me off about this. The users are the criminals. Period. The moment they choose to host illegal materials that is who law should punish. And these networks always will be run over hence the materials being there for years without intervention. So to say that they both advertise to share and for users to connect they are no different in that regard. Just named differently.
Also note I have more respect for you for your last message. So please continue to engage in the conversation but shit man please lighten up for your own sake. Your going to give yourself a heart attack; And by all means I am just a curious person talking semantics with you. So truly I'd like to know why one can have a server and host illegal data. But the other can't without the full bulk of law ramming its wang down its throats? Is that not a valid question?
I mean facebook itself is saturated with crimes? How is it truly any better at a fundamental level?
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
facebook doesn't host illegal files pure and simple and when they do theirs dedicated algorithms to combat them
Megafuckboy.com continually ignored multiple hundreds of thousands of Illegal files hosted directly on his servers there's a simple and pretty huge difference.
Keep trying to argue and sound intelligent if you want i don't care you can't change facts with faux or even real intelligence.
Bad bye
"B B B B B B b b b b b b but faceboo... :"
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
So your saying they are both complicit but one is a state assisted party so they get a free pass for the same offences. Along with most other sites... Not just facebook. But all servers in the nation hosting illegal data? I don't host data myself. It's not my intent. But those that do on mass scale should all be treated equally. No excuse for that.
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
no one is profiting mainly from illegal files being hosted on it's site
The other is profiting from users interacting with each other on it's site
One doesn't notify the authorities when widespready copyright infringement occurs
the other notifies the authorities when a minor instance of copyright infringement occurs
In the first case the police are in no position to say that he didn't knowingly allow this copyright infringement to occur as they havn't been allowed to investigate and see what is possible or reasonable
In the other case the police cannot be in a position to say that every effort to obey the law whilst operatin it's business has not been followed.
There's a very simple and huge difference
Keep being mad please i don't care you're just sayin the same thing and then turning it into a plot for the authorities to somehow profit from faceboo or whatever your insinuating.
Which is hardly the case it's a case of businesses working with authorities when questionsable acitivities occur within and around their business
The difference with megafuckboy wing no schlong is that he was directly hosting the illegal material and rebroadcasting it
and he was aware of it everyone was aware of it. he should have provided a back door for authorities to access the material in order to remove it if it violated any laws
Cue
"B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b but that's censorship"
I don't care please keep getting upset
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
While I am beginning to see the differences fundamentally why is zuckerberg given a free pass being in possession of illegal files in instances where possession is a crime. He is profiting, and possession of stolen property is still an offence? Drop kim. I'd like to know about this other issue entirely...
1 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
OMG what illegal data are you talking about???????
"of filesharing" on an instant rebroadcasting manner
no nothing like them they host personal images and discussionad copyright free data when copyrighted data comes up on youtube it is taken down or monetized
Just saying things doesn't make it true
But i'm going to keep saying i DON'T care about that neckbeard kim noshclong
because i can see how much it is making you passionate about your lover bad bye
and please if you suffer from mental disorder take your meds otherwise you may believe merely saying things makes them true.
0 [deleted] 2016-12-22
[deleted]
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
I am not saying he didn't know his servers were saturated. but I find it hard to imagine that he willfully was hoping to be a pirates playground. (When he created it); People aren't inherently evil; They make mistakes and I think he can even assist the world if he rededicated himself. Side note, We were all young once, and thought we were invincible-
I just hate when law punishes you more then you deserve; That is the difference between justice, and the gross abuse of the system itself. (I'd certainly be happy to hear more details that make him out to be a super pirate), from what i've read I myself am on the fence. (I doubt any 'one' individual would ever know the full story);
I mean his servers hold masses of information which are literally endless. (I myself would hate myself to be the guys having to do the forensics on that gig). Like Ok so this is what we found:
a googleplex of data. lol. Christ that would take years to sort through. I suppose that is the point though. He provided a service for the many, (originally with a maybe financially minded but rather curious intent), and at this point he is ultimately to blame for everyone else's including his own fuckery. I don't think he himself knows exactly everything that he has been storing;
but as far as the situation goes. I just hope he pulls through it.
I am a bit of a humanitarian, and rather hope all people will thrive in this world. It's far too difficult to fail, and the situation we face every day only make it that much more difficult to get yourself on the right track. So If he is the devil to you in that regard... (in my opinion), I've seen far worse-
2 [deleted] 2016-12-22
[deleted]
2 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
From someone that's made constant mistakes in my own youth;
I can only say thirteen years is a long time to have learned the error of your ways. As so being an eccentric person is always likely when having the luxury. I expect to hear even more failures in his future then we have now, but to wager he hasn't already achieved great things by this time; Would be a great devaluing of the services and capacity of growth he may still be able to achieve should the world allow it.
The story I best look forward to hearing is the one involving his family. Being a father myself I know if anything has taught me to press on; It was the fact I am no longer doing it for myself. In that extent alone from one being to another, I'd promote giving him a second chance. (a final chance maybe). Yet a chance all the same.
Make peace with your enemies, find patience through your hardships; And forgive the elements of life you best regret. That's why they say forgiveness is divine. Essentially it is;
1 [deleted] 2016-12-22
[deleted]
3 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
Ego is a testament to the challenges we have faced, and already overcome. You will get past this, and when you do; That is when a true smile will form; and it won't matter anymore; I am sorry your compelled by it today; But I believe in everyone's ability to find closure. Both kims, and your own. It isn't my place to conclude anything in this; but you will always have my advice :)
Do as the animals do, and make today your bitch ;)
1 [deleted] 2016-12-22
[deleted]
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
I think in 3 days you may see a 6.0 in south japan. Technically I aim for mega quakes. Hence the january prediction.
Essentially when people say earthquakes happen everyday they are right. However the real threatening ones are rare. So I focus on pointing those earthquakes out, so I can prove my thesis.
If you can show your on top of the largest events you can work the data down into the small ones. But to prove the theory you have to wait until you have undeniable evidence (to move the work itself forward). and So we wait :)
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
about 4 hours ago 5.1 magnitude, 7 km depth Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan
Near here (a little south). Maybe 72-96 hours ;)
1 [deleted] 2016-12-22
[deleted]
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
You too, Spend it with your family. If your in newyork be safe - I've a bad feeling about an attack there on the 28th. I've already reported it myself; However this year is looking gloomy; So stay safe through newyears, and keep your eyes open ya. (maybe avoid crowds altogether).
1 [deleted] 2016-12-22
[deleted]
1 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
You too mass :) Have a great day :)
1 PortOfDenver 2016-12-22
"Impossible. Nobody gets blackmailed or controlled. Nothing is staged."
5 [deleted] 2016-12-22
[deleted]
3 GlobalHell 2016-12-22
Do tell-
I'd rather like to see an insider post, on your obvious agenda minded activities. (no offense), but your views must be triggered by something, of variety; One that this forum could for-once-and-all-appreciate.
5 [deleted] 2016-12-22
[deleted]
6 JustBlazedNYC 2016-12-22
I wanna hear this. Links?
1 Sjengo 2016-12-22
Nothing?
1 [deleted] 2016-12-22
[deleted]
1 JustBlazedNYC 2016-12-22
The few things you claim to know. I never asked for proof. I just want to hear what you have to say.
5 therealmerloc 2016-12-22
LOL shill getting offers to whistle blow live on targeted threads. amazing
1 gshwk 2016-12-22
Will you apologize to him if this turns out to be bs?
1 vibepusher 2016-12-22
Hear Ye! Hear Ye! The grand high arbiter, he who decides what is true and what is not has spoken! He also decrees that those who deign to disagree with his dictates are aligned with all that is evil. That is all.
5 MockingbirdMan 2016-12-22
Do you speak yucatec?
8 otis0587 2016-12-22
He made similar threats last time there was a general election in NZ, hes just got beef with the government and trying to get out of being deported from NZ
7 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-12-22
So what happened to the bombshell evidence he said he had when it came to HC?
6 AdviseMyAdvice 2016-12-22
Obama is still president.
-1 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-12-22
What does that have to do with anything?
6 AdviseMyAdvice 2016-12-22
https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/800412319725404161
1 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-12-22
And when that comes and goes, just like all the other shit, then what?
2 AdviseMyAdvice 2016-12-22
Ask me when that happens
1 THE_LORD_HERESY 2016-12-22
I will.
1 rico_of_borg 2016-12-22
!RemindMe 30 days
1 RemindMeBot 2016-12-22
I will be messaging you on 2017-01-22 06:35:25 UTC to remind you of this link.
CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.
1 abortionlord252 2016-12-22
I always thought that was in regards to what Wikileaks has, and was it leaking. Just need dem keys.
0 ILoveJuices 2016-12-22
He sent it to Wikileaks on Hillary's birthday, but because Wikileaks has been compromised it hasnt been published.
7 SpuckFez 2016-12-22
All of this "As soon as I release these leaks then you'll really see" crap gets old.
7 EricCarver 2016-12-22
He was the one that inferred he had Hillary's deleted emails, and at the last moment instead posted that they should ask the NSA to run an xKeyscore search for them.
Does he ever come through?
1 g3374r2d2 2016-12-22
Depends what lens you look at him through. Maybe he was alluding to the keyscore thing happening now. Who knows?
Too much disinfo to be legit!
6 Ninjakick666 2016-12-22
"I heard from a reliable source that the Podesta emails seem like cotton candy compared to the amount of disgusting dishonesty the National government will see leaked at the next election."
5 globalistJoe 2016-12-22
why wait until the next election? the leakers sure do try to seem altruistic, but what's their real agenda??????????
6 Ty199 2016-12-22
More people pay attention to politics during elections.
3 psy_raven 2016-12-22
No one believes that fat fuck anymore.
2 SativaGanesh 2016-12-22
Kiwis are cool people, whys he's trying to stir shit up.
5 The_Majestic_ 2016-12-22
Our government is just as scummy as any other government.
1 SativaGanesh 2016-12-22
I'm sure, I was just joking. I don't know much about new Zealand politics, just that the drug policy is a nightmare. I've got an old elementary school friend who moved the about 15 years ago, he loves the landscape at least, we don't talk too much about the politics.
1 The_Majestic_ 2016-12-22
At least the green party has announced a major reform on Canabis which is honestly something id never thought I'd see happen here.
2 redditeditard 2016-12-22
Why would you announce this?
2 PortOfDenver 2016-12-22
Scenario: An authentic whIstleblower or leaker appears who is a real threat (unlike our current celebrity leakers). Dishes out alarming 9/11 info, definitive FBI links to false flags, etc.
So this time, the Feds are truly terrified. They decide to set up the leaker as a patsy. They plant false info leading to "release of terrorists" or some such set-up mechanism. The real leaker leaks the fake info. Chain reaction. Then a dirty bomb goes off in LAX Airport.
Suddenly a real whistleblower is framed -- which is what intel agencies like the FBI do best. Classic pretext for the "war on whistleblowers" to expand.
But this hasn't happened yet.
If you believe this subreddit, nobody in their right mind is skeptical about leakers or whistleblowers. They couldn't be fake. They couldn't be planted. They couldn't be used. They couldn't be deceived themselves. They couldn't be limited hangouts. Stop thinking, just believe, stop being cautious of traps.
So why hasn't the "Whistleblower Causes Mass-Casualties" false flag been done yet?
Either you believe that intelligence factions use false flags, or you don't. If they had no use for fake whistleblowers, they would get serious. If they weren't currently benefitting, they would stage a false flag. But that is not happening yet. Not yet. Not finished getting mileage from the celebrities yet.
2 Commenter_0 2016-12-22
He said he had shit to leak on shillary and nothing came of it. He's the boy that cried wolf.
2 AwayWeGo112 2016-12-22
The cypherpunks have been fighting an underground raging cyberwar for years. It's crazy!
2 [deleted] 2016-12-22
Wasn't this the guy who posted on Twitter along the lines of "nah Julian Assange is safe he's just too busy to confirm he's alive cos he's working on the Nov 4 super leak" which never happened
2 ConspiratorialChairs 2016-12-22
And you'll never see those leaks because Kim Dotcom is a large (literally) pile of shit.
2 jarxlots 2016-12-22
1 The_Majestic_ 2016-12-22
National is fucked without John Key anyway.
You can tell he jumped shipped before everything starts going tits up
1 therealmerloc 2016-12-22
RELEASE THE DATA
1 cakes_and_pies 2016-12-22
He hasn't delivered on any of "his promises".
1 busetgadapet 2016-12-22
lol nice try, mainstream media will just banned the information as fake news and the world will continue like usual
1 BillStrongbow 2016-12-22
This guy is just building his Twitter following, possibly trying to con some teenagers into buying a bunch of nothing. Every Intel agency is way up his ass, no way he's an active hacker
1 DNCsucks 2016-12-22
Kim always talks but he is just advertising himself, will never uses any of his online services.
1 cb75 2016-12-22
He has nothing, like every other claim he has made.
1 bitcoin_noob 2016-12-22
Now we know why Prime Minister Key resigned.
1 gnovos 2016-12-22
They'll get to him before it comes out. Then he'll release a weak sauce limited hangout. Guaranteed.
1 SomeGuyInNewZealand 2016-12-22
Pls cross post this to /r/newzealand
1 gods_bones 2016-12-22
But then they release it and the politicians just tell the media to tell the public its a lie and that only thekr website can be trusted for "nonfake" news. I honestly dont see any change. Not because the hackers arent effective, they are, but because the mass majority has become too despondent to care. I honestly feel like people dont care about how corrupt their politicians are anymore, nor do they care about the fact that the fence is tightening around us every day.
1 Im_the_expert 2016-12-22
Post it or fuck off.
1 lolzwinner 2016-12-22
"TAKE DOWN THE GOVERNMENT WITH THIS ONE QUICK TRICK"
1 Fact154 2016-12-22
I'll believe his claims once he follows up on more than 10% of them
1 Apersonofinterest666 2016-12-22
Kim Dotcom has been saying a lot of things.
0 Wolfwoman1210 2016-12-22
Jesus, New Zealand!? Can't he do better than that? I'm sure they got their own corruption issues who doesn't but I'm more interested in mass-murdering type governments being exposed. Unless of course pizza is a thing there too.
3 HillaryBrokeTheLaw 2016-12-22
NZ is part of the 5 eyes and was part of Echelon which was the original global surveillance carried out by the US. NZ is also a tax haven. There's a lot of possible dirt in NZ.
2 bitcoin_noob 2016-12-22
He lives in New Zealand and the government here fucked him over. Plus,
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5gq016/dont_forget_resigning_new_zealand_prime_minister/
0 Krang_Suit 2016-12-22
I don't trust this Kim dot com for one second. I think he is a shill
-4 DerFuhrerFuckFaggles 2016-12-22
He's not a hero he's a fukboy
-10 southtexasmama 2016-12-22
Kim DotCom is backed by Russia. More psyops to overturn democracies.
5 Commenter_0 2016-12-22
If truth is toxic to a democracy then guess what, it ain't a democracy.
1 thesarl 2016-12-22
Wait what? There is a democracy?
6 AdviseMyAdvice 2016-12-22
Obama is still president.
0 ILoveJuices 2016-12-22
He sent it to Wikileaks on Hillary's birthday, but because Wikileaks has been compromised it hasnt been published.
1 abortionlord252 2016-12-22
I always thought that was in regards to what Wikileaks has, and was it leaking. Just need dem keys.
6 Ty199 2016-12-22
More people pay attention to politics during elections.