r/conspiracy: Feminists trying to hold "women only" events are increasingly hounded by trans "women" who believe that, despite having male genitalia, they should be included because they feel they are women. Graffiti at one event proclaimed "Real woman have dicks!"

Feminists trying to hold "women only" events are increasingly hounded by trans "women" who believe that, despite having male genitalia, they should be included because they feel they are women. Graffiti at one event proclaimed "Real woman have dicks!"

28 2016-12-27 by rabbits_dig_deep

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/08/04/woman-2

Our fascist overlords want to destroy the strongest bond on earth: the erotic bond between man and woman. Transgenderism is a full frontal assault on that bond, and consequently on marriage and family.

The importance of family has been mocked so much by our controlled media that it sounds radical to say it, but the family IS the building block of society. We destroy it at our peril.

37 comments

18 Ski7les420 2016-12-27

the snake eating its own tail.

15 sampinko 2016-12-27

Since when is 'Family' defined by the 'erotic bond' between 'man and woman'. Don't you think insisting on such a concept makes YOU the fascist overlord?

Good lord, what has happened to this subreddit.

4 rabbits_dig_deep 2016-12-27

Since when is 'Family' defined by the 'erotic bond' between 'man and woman'

Since the beginning of time.

-5 slingbladerapture 2016-12-27

Which is about 2200 years ago right!? Lmao gtfo

-9 Kelossus 2016-12-27

I'm pretty sure that at the beginning of time all those living cells in the sea did not know what the hell a man or a woman is. Or are you a creationist? If so, don't bother to answer. Your downvote will feel as bright as victory.

2 Iamamansass 2016-12-27

And we all know feelings outweigh reality.

-11 Kelossus 2016-12-27

9 IanPhlegming 2016-12-27

if you believe there is no difference between sea amoebas and sentient human beings, you're on the right track I guess. Personally, I think there's a world and universe of difference.

-2 Kelossus 2016-12-27

Of course there is! But he talked about the beginning of time, didn't he?

Of course, Big Bang and all those things, but I thought he was talking about the beginning of life on earth. The more reason to me if he wasn't.

3 chickenshitmchammers 2016-12-27

Time was created by man

6 hung_kwan 2016-12-27

I'm pretty sure that at the beginning of time all those living cells in the sea did not know what the hell a man or a woman is.

Can you have a north pole without a south pole? What about yin without yang, dark without light, masculine without feminine?

3 LurkPro3000 2016-12-27

Honestly, to ignore the natural duality of male and female is ridiculous. Spirituality and sociology, philosophy, have all centered around sacred male and feminine properties, each of which are inherent in our physiology.

I have nothing against trans people, I am a live and let live kind of person. But the rhetoric surrounding this political and cultural movement of 'gender equality' is ignorant to the point of ridiculousness.

1 crestind 2016-12-27

Maybe erotic isn't the best word, but fundamentally he is correct. Families are about sex and reproduction.

12 InaccurateLinguist 2016-12-27

You know what I've always found weird about many feminists - how they think they have the right to tell other people how to express their sexuality. It's the same kinda dogma that comes from organized religion. Strange bedmates, right? Also, doesn't hurt that the establishment has often been the driver of the feminist movement(s). Funny how the bigots are usually the ones claiming moral superiority.

2 Nogrim5 2016-12-27

what we need to start doing is calling it what it is, authoritarianism and stomping that shit out every time it rears its ugly face.

1 InaccurateLinguist 2016-12-27

this

2 develomancer 2016-12-27

It does seem like strange bed mates but the motives of those involved tend to seem rather similar. I tend to think that regardless of side the zealots will be zealots, just depends what information and narrative they have been fed/exposed to.

2 InaccurateLinguist 2016-12-27

yeah i think this is correct

8 AntiHasbaraUnit 2016-12-27

Jesus Henry Rifle Christ, Ive never been so glad to live in Texas my entire life than I am after reading that. OP, I blame you for any nightmares.

1 notfromhouston 2016-12-27

I'll fucking second that motion.

7 JamesStrangefellow 2016-12-27

The ironic and frustrating aspect of many feminists is that they consistently embody and project masculine energy rather than feminine energy.

5 IanPhlegming 2016-12-27

I dunno, man (or rabbit)....seems to me like a variety of radical leftist women-type groups are fighting amongst themselves. Doesn't have much to do with men--REAL Men--at all.

5 sagradia 2016-12-27

A heterosex relationship is no less likely to fail than a homosex or transsex one. Further, hetero pairings are not even required for reproduction today.

Ultimately, love is the only real necessity for a successful family. Even if gender as we know it evolves, so too will people's attractions.

1 Iamamansass 2016-12-27

Truth is the real necessity.

4 satisfyinghump 2016-12-27

This makes me so happy, just because these feminists are used to using similar tactics, against others. Now they taste it.

-2 InaccurateLinguist 2016-12-27

yeah i'm not so happy about that. i'm concerned that so many people drank the koolaid and had absolutely no consideration for the rights of others or the logical consequences of the policy they supported. and that the brainwashing skewed so greatly on gender lines. this is actually concerning.

but then again, society in general has accepted a whole buncha bad programming (war and religion come to mind) that maybe it's just the human condition to badly audit one's programs.

3 ReturnOfAbeLincoln 2016-12-27

And these people wonder why most rational adults can't take them seriously

3 News_Bot 2016-12-27

Marriage has always been bullshit and until romanticism had little or nothing to do with love.

Family is no building block to anything, humans are incredibly versatile. We can be raised by fucking wolves and still adapt and survive adequately. The adage "it takes a village to raise a child" isn't random, it's based on documented cases throughout history where children were not raised solely by a mother and father, and if you were rich you were lucky enough not to deal with the little fucks.

So many of these "love and family" ideologues happen to have affairs and are shitty parents in the same way some politicians who oppose same sex marriage or gay rights also fuck men. At its core these sort of rigid ideologies are narcissistic and egotistical, they satiate an innate desire to feel good about oneself, only at any expense. Cognitive dissonance and compartmentalization play a role too.

In nature, homosexuality and transexualism benefit the species because they increase the amount of viable parents of both maternal and paternal instinct, without limiting them by genitalia. More parents, more surviving children. Gender and sexuality don't matter, both are wide spectrums that can vary at the drop of a dime based on something as seemingly disconnected as culture. Human sexuality has NEVER been rigid except when culture demanded it. We also thought it was totally awesome that our leaders fuck kids and the varying perspectives on prostitution alone should give you an idea of how culture impacts sexuality.

Do you honestly think it is better for an orphaned child to live without parents when there are perfectly loving and upstanding people willing to adopt them, just because those people are gay? This has never made sense to me and there is absolutely no tangible evidence, scientific or even anecdotal, to support it.

What it means to be man or woman has little to do with genitalia. The actual characteristics of gender are regulated by hormones, both pre and post birth. The brain of a homosexual or transexual individual is more likely to resemble the brain of someone of the opposite sex. I'm interested in the theory that environmental estrogen has much to do with how our gender is determined these days.

1 InaccurateLinguist 2016-12-27

thank you for writing this

2 sheasie 2016-12-27

"Real woman have dicks!"

doublespeak much ?! ;)

2 BigFrenk 2016-12-27

Woman are acting more like males and men more like females. No offense, but this also explains why many girls choose immigrants instead of whites (north america and western europe whites (i do not include eastern european whites)). Because they act more like a male used to act, take the decisions, raise the voice more often, get angry more easily for small things, acts more like a leader, etc. I know it may sound stupid in 2016, but primitive hormones dont follow the callendar. As long as i have known, sweet boyfriends get dumped more quickly and more often compared to others.

1 diordaddy 2016-12-27

Calm down neck beard

1 BigFrenk 2016-12-27

😂😂😂

0 [deleted] 2016-12-27

[deleted]

1 BigFrenk 2016-12-27

k? Never said they couldn't.

1 SonicAfternoon 2016-12-27

Sadly this situation is far beyond salvage

1 TeslasMuse 2016-12-27

clean up the food supply and watch the mental illnesses magically disappear

1 911bodysnatchers322 2016-12-27

It's like how real men have vaginas...in their hearts....

real women have penises... in their brains

transwomen have dix for brains