The problem with you people
0 2017-01-12 by Rugnardl
The MSM is untrustworthy. Zero credibility. EVERYTHING the MSM supports or releases should be ignored. If a story is taken up by the mainstream media, you know it is flavored false, or at least has a deliberate agenda behind it, and should therefor be ignored.
If you are confused about who is telling the truth and who the liars are, use your head. Use what you've learned over the last year, or years, to fully comprehend how the MSM is propaganda, plain and simple.
40 comments
n/a BatteriesForRocker 2017-01-12
What do you mean "you people??"
n/a NoGuiltPopIsGood 2017-01-12
People who believed that false story yesterday
n/a LurkMcGurck 2017-01-12
Beat me to it, you sly fox
n/a BatteriesForRocker 2017-01-12
Yeah... low hanging fruit.
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
Are you offended? Who cares. Are you making a joke? Ignored. Have anything to contribute?
n/a pepe1488 2017-01-12
Contribute to what? You made a thread to just say the media is bad. We know.
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
"You people" don't know, or at least every top voted comment on this sub doesn't know. Trying to sway the conversation
n/a LurkMcGurck 2017-01-12
Dude really? Did you not see the 37485773829 threads about how things are getting suspiciously upvoted? Do some research before you blame a group of people for anything, even if they wear tin hats
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
What are you even talking about
n/a LurkMcGurck 2017-01-12
That there are numerous threads within the last twenty four hours in this sub about how certain posts are being artificially upvoted
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
Yes. I'm simply trying to add worthy to the other end of the scale. Too many bot/shills etc pushing the narrative and getting too much attention. It's despicable
n/a LurkMcGurck 2017-01-12
I think I get what you're saying even though it seems you forgot a word or two, but lemme try... Too many bots up voting suspiciously so people post about that. Then you think to yourself "people are posting too much about bots posting too much, so I should post too much."?
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
I just hope it's as clear to everyone else as it is to me, that what is being upvoted on this sub is not actually real, nor a general consensus of critical thinkers. That's the problem, is that the truth always gets buried under the guys that can pay more to cover it up
n/a LurkMcGurck 2017-01-12
So your advocating the belief that everything is a lie...?
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
No, there's truth. Truth is what happened. Truth is facts. Where would I suggest I believed everything was a lie?
n/a LurkMcGurck 2017-01-12
Ahem. "Truth always gets buried".
If I had a mic it'd be
Dropped.
n/a lavendula13 2017-01-12
The problem with you people is your tendency to throw out the baby with the bathwater. The best battles are fought from within.
n/a Ninjakick666 2017-01-12
MSM is part of the equation... a lot can be learned if you watch them actively instead of passively... Scrutinize every facet and I can glean the truth even if I only have access to Cable News and no other sources...
n/a Putin_loves_cats 2017-01-12
Read all, but read between the lines and take everything with a grain of salt. Best advice I can give.
Side note: Who are you referring to when you say: "You people"?
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
Not taking your bait, don't need advice, won't be reading everything, because a lot of it is subliminal and designed to complicate the truth. Thanks but no thanks. And if you're still wondering who I mean, it's probably you. If you're starting to get defensive, it's probably you. If you advocate for looking at everything, even the propaganda, which is not fact but is designed to convince the average sheep into believing it, then it's probably you. Innocent strategy, playing naive.
n/a Putin_loves_cats 2017-01-12
Oh, the irony ;). Take care then, warrior!
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
Ha nice one. But I'm not defensive
n/a Putin_loves_cats 2017-01-12
Sounds like it. You wouldn't be projecting, now would you?
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
Nope, and it doesn't sound like it either
n/a Putin_loves_cats 2017-01-12
You sure, and how do you know?
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
Well your opinion on it certainly does not make it so
n/a Putin_loves_cats 2017-01-12
Hey, man, you lashed out on me. Who is the "angry/defensive" one? I merely posted good advice I've learned all these years. You flipped it on me for some reason, without and justification. But this is good. People are seeing your intentions ;)
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
3 year account: what's your point?
And I flipped it on you bc you are singing the same as all the others: "take it all and then decide." Also, implying: • MSM is worth watching, even at all. It's not, you know better than that •other sources are on the same level as the MSM, and therefor just as fake, which you know better than that.
Keep calling me defensive, it's not so. Neither am I angry, which is a classic trick
n/a Putin_loves_cats 2017-01-12
Who? I'm a regular contributor here. Dafuq you talking about?
So, you want an echo chamber? Sorry, sweetie, you aint going to get it. All news is biased to an extent, and I suggest you follow my advice.. If not, I really don't give a shit. That's on you... Doesn't affect me, tbh...
You sound angry and defensive...
lol
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
You're pointless. I'm not going to sit here defending pointless accusations, all you do is keep repeating the same thing over and over, regardless of what I say. Keep posting the same bullshit over and over and over guy. You may be a regular contributor, but you contribute nothing but garbage. You've got your talking points figured out, and actual discussion is railroaded into calling names to put people on the defensive. Again, pointless. You are "you people".
n/a Putin_loves_cats 2017-01-12
Sounds like some is angry?
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
Classic trick, call names, try to make your opponent emotionally involved. "U mad bro" Like seriously lol. Literally discredits anything you say
n/a Plumbus_amongus 2017-01-12
If you don't read everything, you're only reading what conforms to your bias. You're willfully being ignorant, and s bad as people who only read MSM info. You're trying to tell me not to read things because YOU say it's all bad information? So who the fuck are you to tell me anything?
This sounds like a self-indulgent T_D post or something from r/iamverysmart.
n/a tehlolredditor 2017-01-12
yeah lets read infowars and breitbart and listen to alex jones only because everything else is balls!
-_-n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
Maybe maybe not, but MSM is owned and operated by wealthy elite that want you to be stupid. They will never tell you the truth.
n/a tehlolredditor 2017-01-12
idk man usually anyone reporting news that gets traction usually has some sort of funding and has their own agenda. they may not be the "wealthy elite" but I can't imagine they are broke bastards. i don't think the elite exists just for one certain ideology or party.
n/a reallywidetree 2017-01-12
After this election I am convinced every single person on the other end of public information channels are actors looking for a buck.
Doesn't matter who's recording the bullshit.
n/a KnightBeforeTomorrow 2017-01-12
Call them Legacy Media Help put these cretins on skates and give them a firm push out the door.
n/a rilexusmaximus 2017-01-12
Dont ignore any news, QUESTION IN. They told us to ignore ctr "trolls" and we fell for that one.
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
It's such a waste of time, imo. It's clear what we should be skeptical of
n/a PantsOffAtHome 2017-01-12
PrisonPlanet.com / Infowars if you want the pure juice
n/a Putin_loves_cats 2017-01-12
You sure, and how do you know?
n/a Putin_loves_cats 2017-01-12
Hey, man, you lashed out on me. Who is the "angry/defensive" one? I merely posted good advice I've learned all these years. You flipped it on me for some reason, without and justification. But this is good. People are seeing your intentions ;)
n/a Rugnardl 2017-01-12
Maybe maybe not, but MSM is owned and operated by wealthy elite that want you to be stupid. They will never tell you the truth.