Let's remember, 2012 election Goldmansach's donated money to both candidates. Nothing here is new. Goldmansach's will play whether we like it or not.

remember, stop supporting trump then

lol it doesn't matter either who you support

good then don't support trump 24/7 on reddit, just saying if you admit that don't then have a post history full of supporting trump

shouldn't have one supporting Hillary either, and don't use lesser evil excuse either.

I wish a giant meteror was an option, cuz we humans should not be allowed off this planet. We're 5150... You ever wonder why we haven't "found" intelligent life in the galaxy? Simple, because the intelligent life won't come near such a volatile and dangerous specie.

I'm ready for the next E. L. E. We need to weed out the weaker humans.

just be careful what you wish for

How are you so sure you won't be weeded out.

When it's all said and done I feel that the population would be so thin that maybe 10%-15% of the population will survive. I'm fine with that. But I'll last longer than any gun-hating liberal.

My guy, you spend way more time Reddit. Just because I know it doesn't matter who I support doesn't mean I shouldn't. That may sound hypocritical, and it very well is, and that's what people need to realize, that everyone is a hypocrite.

Also don't tell me what to do. The fact of the matter is that there were only two choices this election. And don't use that third party excuse either.

meltdown?

Lol nah

will take that as a yes

Okay

Don't make it black and white, you sound very dim witted. Trump was a good option to defeat Hillary, who would have undoubtedly caused a greater shitstorm and she should have already been in prison.

Which option would you prefer: Obama 2.0 and further globalization and degeneration, or a resurgence in nationalism with a chance to focus on American infrastructure. The latter is much more appealing and beneficial for the long term if we're going to awaken the masses. Nationalism is a must.

While I've always believed Trump was no less a puppet than any other politician, it is becoming clearer by the minute that today Goldman Sachs is about to be given control of the United States.

You should see their ticker around the election. NYSE:GS

Biggest spike since the 2008 election. After such a boring and uneventful year, alllll of a sudden they jump on election news... Smells like fish.

they owned Obama and did a nice con job with help of their controlled media this time.

Who did you want him to pick, Jake from State Farm?

Anyone other than people from the very same swamp he claims to be draining?

like who? any specific names?

Louie C.K and Jacque Fresco

I love it how it went from:

Trump was given rep nomination specifically so Hillary would win, since he was unwinnable.

to

Hillary was given adequate resources to steal the dem nomination specifically so Trump would win, since she was unwinnable.

As for Goldman Sachs, the test is rather easy:

1. They were the single largest donors promoting the TPP

2. They do massive business in China

they did trick us, I thought trump, a long time Clinton pal, was running for Hillary to easily win but it was the other way around.

You mean, you didn't know what you were talking about then and still don't.

don't tell me, are you cucked by sachs too?

I put up two easily confirmed positions that Sachs was strongly for and Trump strongly against. And all you have is:

I was fooled, but now I'm not.

Maybe you still are.

i'll take that as a yes. blocked

I liken Goldman Sachs to the CIA or any other large organization. To think that everyone in Goldman, or even a majority, is corrupt, is just crazy. Sure, CIA has ruined America but with their compartmentalization, a few evil folk can really run amok.

Until you see Trumps appointee's actually doing something bad, sit back and enjoy the show.

Good perspective, man and I know it doesn't seem like a popular opinion, but I like to wait to hold them accountable for their actions when their intentions become apparent. Right now, we still can't be sure.

I think we will know the intentions of the trump administrations intentions with if and how quickly they withdraw troops from Poland.

Why is that the #1 issue?

In December, Obama moved 10s of thousands of tanks along with other military equipment to eastern Poland. Biggest move since wwii. I just don't want war and I think a lot of people would agree. I want us to start focusing less on that stuff and mo on fixing what's broken in America.

Lol, "10s of thousands." No, the number is eighty. It's hardly a declaration of war.

My bad sometimes I misremember. Thanks for keeping me accurate.

You gotta be more diligent, don't just trust what some random guy says on the internet. Look up the info and see the numbers for yourself. You were closer to the truth. It is 3,500 troops.

You're right to worry about this, since it's the first time in US history that we've established permanent occupation in Poland, which borders Russia. It is a thinly veiled threat.

I looked it up, it wasn't 80 tanks, but it wasn't my original tens of thousands of tanks. Not many articles had accurate numbers and I didn't have much time to look up the number but I got a better feeling and edited the range.

But yeah, it's definitely significant and no one should think it isn't, which is the point here.

No he's not. He said we're sending in tens of thousands of tanks initially. We are sending in 87 tanks + many troops.

How and where does that article state 80? lol.

That article doesn't but you can look it up. It's 87. And other vehicles too, not sure how many of those.

I still don't see how thousands of troops correlates with vehicles.

The guy I replied to changed his comment. He said we were bringing "tens of thousands of tanks."

Just going to reply again. OP initially claimed that the US was sending "TENS OF THOUSANDS OF TANKS" into Poland. I corrected this.

Ah, I see. My mistake then. Sorry! :)

the new deployment — which includes some 3,500 U.S. troops — marks the first-ever continuous deployment to the region by a NATO ally. [1]

Next time you should actually check a source before spewing bullshit about something you know nothing about.

Check OP's comment. He was saying "tens of thousands of tanks." Try again.

It seems common sensical in a way, no? I mean to demonize Trump because he is rich is doing the same thing. I get it, we don't want more of the same. But do we bring in regular folk to do it? They have no connections. I'd venture to say, we even need a little of the enemy, keep close eyes on, to help out!

I agree re the troops as well. If Trump is going to have closer relations to Russia, what good is having troops there do? That stops Russia from invading? No sense in wasting money. Talk, make business deals. Maybe Russia can become a nice trade partner. (They don'T do GMO!)

Fingers crossed, heart open and calling on KEK, let's do this.

I agree. Does anyone really expect anything more than this administration? It's a step in the right direction for America. Maybe everyone will start realizing that all politicians are the same once they see the opposing candidates doing the same shit.

I just hope Trump at least brings productivity back to America. That's what we've been lacking for a long time. And hopefully his business attitude will help get things done. And hopefully those "things" will help the people. I want tax cuts. I want efficiency. And this is the first time that someone with some experience in efficiency is going to lead us in awhile. We'll see.

Perhaps the most exciting thing here, is that Trump is a businessman. He can fix a lot of these problems with common sense (business).

As you said, a step in the right direction, but a big step. Honestly, we have been led by the least and most corrupt among us. I think this isn't just about fixing things, but about returning to prosperity, which we all deserve. But we have to fix our Country first, protectionism.

:-)

Agreed. I just hope he really does use logic and common sense to weed out the bullshit. We'll see. This is the beginning of something new to say the least.

There is no way Trump got here alone. I feel/think strongly he is being helped from the inside. Where Hillary/CIA was taking this country was dangerous. Trump is EXTREMELY well connected (I suggest you research here). I think this was a "simple" take back. If Trump really goes against these corrupt globalists, oh boy.

Honestly, I think the intelligence agenc(ies) leaked the information (or something similar) in order to take our country back. As we both said, time will tell.

Yeah, new to say the least and just at the right time. Where we were going was 1984 (their plan book.)

I hope so. There's been rumors about the FBI helping trump for awhile, especially with the FBIanons. I really hope that there's a plan to take the country back, and it's going well.

This is a great point to keep in mind. Just sit back and watch until they give you a reason to scream at them. And there is some real corruption right now in our government maybe we need some snakes to help drive out the evil.

Not sure I got you 100%, but I mean to watch their actions and get a feel for how they are correcting/directing things and changing the government. We are 20 trillion in debt, that is a huge figure. Trump, I do think he can actually mess up the globalist plan of crashing things, at least he can soften the fall.

Regular politicians and more of the corrupt FED to fix a problem they have created (and by the looks of it - with INTENTION) will completely destroy this country, so I think a businessman used to dealing in BIG money can grasp how to fix things here. Something that looks intentionally driven, just like all the recent corrupt wars driven off, in part, Falsely driven CIA data.

Tillison is in that group of being powerful in his connections. He can really make deals happen, he can really help to let America get connected to more of the world. We can be a bit like Germany having an industrial/factory (e.g. exporting cars, electronics, etc.) and still being an IT and service wherehouse. And whatever else. WE just have to re-arrange things and help steer the world in a productive direction, not ignoring the environment, but not accepting some laws that are designed with bad intentions and based on bad data or political intentions.

Having those military men, 3 Generals around him is gonna save us money and reflect a know nonsense approach to problems. Hopefully no more global police, but still a strong military until this world (Elites) can figure out how to stop killing eachother.

Or, we can just remove those Elites. That is what I am hoping for in the next 8 years. Taking back our world.

Yeah I agree with you, I didn't really state my point too clearly my apologies. But I agree I really hope that he is thinking about taking down the federal reserve and cutting the fat off of the CIA and removing these assholes that have been controlling us for so long from power. I'm hoping he may be a catalyst in the people's awakening and from there we will reclaim our world. Hopefully he can pull through hopefully humanity can pull through.

No worries, I wasn't sure so didn't want to attack you point, just clarify mine. ;-)

I agree with your words here. Perhaps we truly are in for a cleansing and awakening.

Your point has some merit, but I would feel better if someone similar to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was appointed into the cabinet, rather than a super rich person who amassed their fortune by polluting and destroying the planet.

We sure haven't started off on the right foot if you ask me and we will never be privy to the backroom deals this cabinet does. You'll get some fluff pieces of PR and a new health care system that will fool the public into trusting this regime (but still makes insurance companies wealthy). Humanity is about to get the corporate screws tightened on itself more than anyone thought possible.

Make sure to have a big "thank you" ready for everyone who continues to vote for two-party crony capitalism when you finally wake up and realize neither Democrats or Republicans are the answers for the people.

Upvote for you, man. Nobody is calling Trump a saint, in my opinion, if its true what they say about Goldman Sachs, enemy of my enemy is my friend.

So much for "draining the swamp" huh?

How many times can this phrase be written and still be upvoted?

Probably the same amount of times Trump said it and ignored it

get used to it. every day. Obama voters needed to get reminded too and it was for their own good. hope and no change from W's policies.

Obama voters do realise what a terrible leader he was? Oh, he was charismatic, polite, good-looking and black so it doesnt matter how he fucked the economy, huh?

you couldn't criticize him or you'd be called racist

So, you know that destabilizing currencies is George Soros' tactic of choice when attempting to effect regime change, right? And therefore it would make sense to put people that understand money in key positions?

Maybe give him a few months before convicting him off a crime he hasn't actually committed yet...

I didn't say anything about a crime. Just pointing out crony capitalism is what drives cabinet picks. Would have been the same with Hillary, just a different set of highest donators.

I didn't say anything about a crime.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/metaphor

There's no real evidence that crony capitalism is driving Trump's pics, just "muh Goldman Sachs" rhetoric. From my perspective, I see Trump gearing up for a fight with the globalist powers that be. Since he was only sworn in fewer than two hours ago, I'm willing to give him a chance to demonstrate whether my reality or your reality is more correct.

He is in a fight with globalists powers, but he appoints people from the globalists favorite investment bank? Makes sense.

The FBI is corrupt, but there are good FBI agents. Why is it such a stretch to assume the same about Goldman Sachs? I don't know what his cabinet picks will do. I do know that, having watched this election intently, I'm willing to see what he actually does rather than condemning him with no real evidence.

Man I'm sorry to break this to you but we don't choose the president the elite does. So he just as corrupt as the last presidents. Hence why he has been picking people who worked for the Rothschild. If you don't know who that's they're the richest family in the world and they have central banks in almost every country other than Syria, Cuba, and NK.

So you are of the opinion that this whole thing was a giant smoke and mirrors show, and a Trump presidency was what they wanted all along? I have entertained the notion but it doesn't add up for me. I concede the possibility though.

Yes, I do believe the elite chooses the president not us. If you do some more research you will see that the elite control everything we do and I mean everything. Propaganda a motherfucker and that's what they use to get us to vote for certain people or suggest us to do certain things and act a certain way.

Putin kicked the Rothschild's out of Russia too. Oh and goldman Sachs partners weren't allowed to donate to Trump. it's still strange he keeps appointing Sachs people to positions, but he's most likely not in bed with them like everyone's trying to act.

with no real evidence

Since you didn't respond to my other comment, I'll just report it here.

"Then why did Betsy Devos, who has literally no experience with public education, AT ALL, who also conveniently donated (personally) at least 15 million to Trump's campaign, get appointed as Sec of Education?

Or did you just not know about that?"

Sorry for having a life, fam.

That sure would look a lot like crony capitalism. If it were true, of course. Funny how I can't seem to find anything to back up your accusation. I'm going to have to go ahead and label this claim [citation needed]

Additionally, now that I have looked at her credentials, I think she might be a good pick.

Dude they talked about it in her confirmation hearing. Her family has donated hundreds ofillions of dollars to the GOP. It's been in the news.

If you couldn't find anything it it you weren't looking.

Link, or you're a filthy, lying propagandist. I did my part; I looked and could not find a single source to substantiate this claim. If you can't find even one source to share here, STFU and GTFO.

So when it's a liberal Goldman Sachs thing it's a negative. When it's a Trump Goldman Sachs thing it's an overblown rhetoric. You do understand this logic is all sorts of stupid, right?

I made no such assertion. All I'm saying is that I'm willing to use reason and give Trump a chance, rather than succumb to emotion and run around like a headless chicken.

Head firmly in the sand, I see. Wipe the billionaire's shit from your mouth and question everything, regardless of your ideology.

Aww, that's cute. You know I'm right but your emotions won't allow you to admit it, so you resort to insulting language.

For the record, while I actually don't care what you think of me, I do have to protest your implied assertion that I don't "question everything". I even look up sources for other poster's often quite sketchy claims before asking for sources, because I prefer to have the facts on my side before getting into it with someone.

There's no real evidence that crony capitalism is driving Trump's pics

Then why did Betsy Devos, who has literally no experience with public education, AT ALL, who also conveniently donated (personally) at least 15 million to Trump's campaign, get appointed as Sec of Education?

Or did you just not know about that?

That sure would look a lot like crony capitalism. If it were true, of course. Funny how I can't seem to find anything to back up your accusation. I'm going to have to go ahead and label this claim [citation needed]

Additionally, now that I have looked at her credentials, I think she might be a good pick.

Trump will not take on the system that made him what he is. He may be a Washington outsider, but he's a big business insider.

I trust you have more than just emotion to base this statement on?

well with that logic, all of Obama's cabinet picks make sense now too. hmm.

Obama was just a tool of Soros to weaken our national unity and soil our reputation in the rest of the world, and he did a fantastic job at that. Having HRC and John Kerry as Secretaries of State definitely helped with the latter. I admit that I'm not completely up on all the horrible people he chose; I'm sure you would do a better job of fleshing out this idea than I would.

(Actually, please do, I'm genuinely curious, as my own real awareness of politics really only started about two years ago.)

There's layers to this shit man.

That I will agree with you on.

Isn't Donald Trump supposed to be an amazing businessman, an economical genius? Isn't he the best with money.....? Sarcasm aside, I see your point, but I respectfully disagree.

Looks like Israel will continue to run the show.

Oh, but its okay because they say they weren't involved with the defrauding of investors in 2008. They were completely unaware of the actions their colleagues and business partners were using.

Never trust a banker.

I really feel that he is putting these people in his cabinet out of fear for his life from the higher powers

It's concerning.

However, I think the context mitigates this somewhat. Trump was legitimately having difficulty filling a lot of positions in his cabinet. And it is possible that he trying to find people within the system that will work to accomplish some good.

I have no illusions that he is George Washington, but I remain genuinely convinced he is going to work hard to work things in the right direction within the paradigm that exists. He has to, or he will die.

Probably really hard to find folks who aren't blackmailed and actually want to do good for the majority. Honestly I think people are not giving pizzagate the credit it deserves for the effect on the election.

The FBI is about to pounce but I hope they actually go for the big dogs on both sides. Them republican pedo's are just as much into satanic ritual as democrats. Sadly I believe we will get maybe 10 of the 100's of pedos.

The FBI is about to pounce but I hope they actually go for the big dogs on both sides.

Did you read the FBI anon stuff on 4chan? It really would be hard to do this. I mean, civil war is likely if they do.

I'm not saying it would be wrong. Some things are worth starting civil wars over. But hopefully we can transition away from this pedophile-blackmail system of control without millions of people dying.

Try to remember, Wall Street and especially Goldman hires the best and brightest minds from great schools. Because someone works for Goldman Sachs doesn't necessarily mean they will be corrupt and evil will follow them. It's also possible Trump is filling the swamp with guys who are capable of getting the job done. Or Trump's crooked too. Whichever.

I hope that it's more along the lines that he knows Soro's is gonna intentionally make the market shitty for him, so he's hiring the smartest money people we have to strike first.

That's why I've carefully created a contingency plan. Bug-out bag, and all.

the fuck did you expect?

the game is always fixed

five.... bwhahahahahahahhaa Drain the swamp... rofl... lol OMG.. no it hurts.. Yeah he's an "outsider". ROFLMAO

THIS IS MORE OF THE SAME. Trump is literally setting up the dominoes to the New World Order. It's game time people. Rather, it's crunch time.

Goldman Sachs is not sending their best, but some, I assume, are good people.

You cannot enter the White House without pandering to Jews. They have such an iron grip of America that it's virtually inconceivable to imagine a president without Jewish aids. The only thing we can hope for is that us commoners continue to disseminate effective propaganda concerning Jewish/Israeli nepotism and control.

oh he's just playing 4-d chess and has all the cheats and you're just not condiment enough to understand.

yes that's right, condiment.

good then don't support trump 24/7 on reddit, just saying if you admit that don't then have a post history full of supporting trump

shouldn't have one supporting Hillary either, and don't use lesser evil excuse either.

Link, or you're a filthy, lying propagandist. I did my part; I looked and could not find a single source to substantiate this claim. If you can't find even one source to share here, STFU and GTFO.