Legitimate question regarding Pizzagate and Donald Trump.
226 2017-01-23 by CumFreeSox
I've been lurking on this subreddit for years now and I've watched it go from tongue-in-cheek, to a place for serious, non-partisan, critique at potential global conspiracies, to a pro-Trump/anti-Liberal sub. So before I get downvoted to oblivion for putting the words "Trump" and "Pizzagate" in the same title- let me just say that I'm not here to be anti-Trump. I'm not anti-Trump at all. I'm here because I have a question about Pizzagate that involves Trump and I would actually prefer if someone could provide an answer to my question that would clear up my suspicions regarding Trump in connection to Pizzagate.
My question is: Why does Pizzagate not include an investigation of or at least an in-depth look at Donald Trump? It seems like Pizzagate looks at a lot of leaders and politicians while carefully skirting around any mention of Donald Trump.
I understand why others like Podesta, the Clintons, etc are being looked at. Especially Bill Clinton, because if anyone is trafficking child-victims for sex in DC, he definitely had a hand in it. It's known that he was flying with Jeffrey Epstein and there have been numerous rape accusations made against Bill (including a case that he settled) so it seems very likely that he's involved.
Trump on the other hand has also been accused of having sex with underage girls. Which (thankfully) turned out to be false. The thing is though, it wasn't proved to be false in a court of law, the accuser dropped the suit and I noticed a sort of "thou dost protest too much" thing happening with that which made me kind of uncomfortable. He is also alleged to have taken trips to that same sex slave island with Epstein and Clinton. Epstein and Clinton were also both members of Trump's private Mar-a-Lago Club (I have my own suspicions about these private clubs for rich people) and perhaps the most damning thing is that Trump is quoted as saying:
"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy... He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life."
Which came off as very disturbing to me. Naturally as soon as Epstein's crimes were exposed, Trump changed his tune and spoke about what a terrible person Epstein is as anyone would have. But still, I haven't seen a single one of my fellow truth-seekers in this sub or anywhere else say that there might be anything off about this quote or Trump's close friendships with both Clinton and Epstein in the past.
I'm concerned that people are letting their un-wavering support for Donald Trump cloud their pursuit of the truth. I'm NOT saying that Trump is as guilty as Bill Clinton or even guilty at all by any means. I actually really hope he's not. I'm just concerned that no one has even bothered to look into it. In my opinion, that quote alone should be enough to at least raise a bit of concern or suspicion, but there hasn't even been a concerted effort to look into it in an attempt to even clear his name. Like, we are only (thankfully) aware of the Podesta thing because people looked into the emails. These people aren't just going to shout their guilt or involvement from the rooftops, you know. But instead of looking into the private Mar-a-Lago club records or anything at all, we're just flat out ignoring it. Why though?
Edit: I'm really not sure why I even bothered. This post is being downvoted and all my comments are being downvoted. I've tried to be rational and fair about this and I'm getting shit on for questioning and being freethinking- which is (or was) the entire point of this sub. People talk about "CTR brigading and downvoting everything" but sometimes you guys are just as bad with anything you view as a being a "negative" critique of Trump. I think I'm done here.
Edit 2: I came back and am trying to respond to everyone and ask for sources if you have em. Thanks to the non-partisan folks for showing up and restoring some of my faith in this sub. I hate how often a simple question gets turned around as an attack on the asker when I've tried to make it clear that I am not against Trump and that no amount of accusations will make that true. I'm even being told I "should have kept my mouth shut" and that I need to "GTFO". Yeah no, you people are the ones who are just making me even more suspicious by attempting to silence me.
Edit 3: Just wanted to say thanks again to the level-headed people who came out and took some time to discuss this with me. I've learned some really interesting things from this thread and my conclusion is that while this is worth looking into further (see /u/Know_Comment's comment about Roy Cohn), this does not mean that I'm going to just stop supporting Trump just because I have some suspicions about his connections to this whole thing. At the end of the day, he still has mine and America's best interests at heart and I truly believe he will Make America Great Again!
Before I go though, let me just echo/paraphrase /u/JTwPAXT a bit and say that those of you who blindly trust in Trump or Clinton or Sanders or anyone else don't really belong in this sub. Per the sidebar- "This is a forum for free thinking and discussing issues which have captured the public’s imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goals are a fairer, more transparent world and a better future for everyone." If you support Trump like I do, great, but don't let it cloud up your judgement to the point where hearing or reading anything negative makes you shut down and try to shut others down. People are allowed to ask questions without being attacked or silenced. Do your best to rationally explain your position and make a point without coming off as close-minded person and you should be fine!
170 comments
n/a brettcal82 2017-01-23
Dude we are not a pro trump sub we are only down voting shills postings rubbish claims trying to discredit the guy. If someone posted decent evidence about him we'd discuss it.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Maybe I phrased it wrong, but at any given time for the last year and a half- the top posts have all been anti-Liberal and pro/in defense of Trump. Even right now one of the top posts is just an image macro of Hillary regurgitating stuff that we already know about her emails and lower down there are 3-4 posts either defending Trump or only mentioning him in a positive light. If you do a search on the sub for "Trump" for every 1 negative post about him there are 5-10 positive/favorable ones. I'm not saying that's bad I'm just saying it's definitely a thing.
And as for the emails- I want to see Hillary Clinton in jail as much as anyone, but it's really up to Trump now to make sure that will happen as he originally promised but he already said he's not going to pursue it so I'm not even sure why we're still talking about it. Just gives Liberals more fuel to keep saying "HURR DURR LOCK HER UP WAS A LIE!" and I'm personally sick of hearing that.
n/a VeryGrumpyTiger 2017-01-23
Reality show the opposite, just search for "Trump" on this subreddit. It's literally a place for Trump propaganda and the mods allow it.
n/a Premium_Panda 2017-01-23
Exactly
n/a doesnotdeliver 2017-01-23
The first step is to admit you have a problem.
n/a tindergod 2017-01-23
If decent evidence is required for a discussion hete, why is pizzagate even a topic?
n/a n00854180t- 2017-01-23
SO you're saying it's perfectly normal to proudly brag that you're BEST FRIENDS with multiple convicted child rapists and traffickers?
Because that's a stupid argument, and we already have physical evidence that Hillary and Podesta are best friends with half a dozen convicted child rapists and traffickers.
n/a tindergod 2017-01-23
I'm not making any claim.
I am just pointing out that there is no evidence.
n/a n00854180t- 2017-01-23
Fucking this. Meanwhile pointing out that it's NOT NORMAL to be self-professed best buddies with half a dozen convicted child rapists/traffickers (Hillary/Podesta) is met by r/politics downvote brigades.
n/a justaponyfan 2017-01-23
I think you hit the nail on the head, OP. We should be very worried about what skeletons Trump has in his closet if he kept them hidden throughout the campaign trail.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
I try not to let the little things like the tax returns bother me, but yeah I'm starting to wish I knew a little bit more about his more private background before I can go all in and say he's above reproach. My biggest fear is for some hack to come out that would completely ruin his image and prove that he is a part of this in some way.
n/a JwPATX 2017-01-23
Ehh...no one's above reproach. Blindly trusting politicians is never good, and I'm with you that his name could easily come up in pizzagate, but as far as something else lurking in his past that's hidden...I have a hard time swallowing that. There were 1000's of ppl, both journalists and citizens trying to find real dirt on the guy for nearly 2 years, and nothing of substance has come out. I don't see how he could have a system for removing scandal from the historical record that works so effectively.
n/a Blunt4words20 2017-01-23
His comments about Jeff were hear say. It is said he likes pretty girls he does not have first hand knowlege maybe they talked on the phone a few times. The he learned the truth about Jeff and changed his tune.
n/a DrDougExeter 2017-01-23
Bullshit. The quote was this:
“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy... He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
I'm sorry, but I don't agree with you that it was hearsay. He was directly quoted and he hasn't denied the quote. This is the kind of thing I'm talking about. It's so easy to go into defense mode over Trump without even bothering to explore any details. The quote was published and he could have sued them for libel- which is something he strongly believes in- if it weren't true. I'll believe it's just hearsay when he denies every having said that.
n/a chickyrogue 2017-01-23
donald trump was acting as an fbi undercover with epstein on the plane
as far as the little girl pagents and their assosciation in the 80s that was also explored in depth [how else would i know i know nothing] so it really is a disservice to our comunity when re-edits decided to fold pizzagate in 8 hours ....
luckily other places have allowed much research to move forward
i suggest doing some research but let me tell you google is broken!
so is reddits
so is facebook
all their institutions broken open for this and they still cant squash it
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Thanks for responding!
Do you have a source for this? I hadn't heard that, but it would really put me at ease.
n/a chickyrogue 2017-01-23
have you been following pizzagate at voat?
there is so much goin on on an international level and yes every institution has been compromised but i am thinkin the good guys have said fuckin enough already
all truth is being revealed
aside from trump watch george webb braverman seriers you will catch up quickly
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
I've been following it a little bit on Voat but haven't seen anything about Trump working undercover for the FBI. I found this about gov agencies trying to bury evidence, which was interesting, but nothing about Trump working for them.
n/a chickyrogue 2017-01-23
well that was most likely made evident here then before they wiped pizzagate away you can google it i just hate google
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Yeah I've been googling it and haven't found a thing, even tried Bing which is actually much better than Google and got nothing. Thanks anyway though.
n/a chickyrogue 2017-01-23
this is really weird becaaue no less than 45 weeks ago i was able to come up with a ton of links and nothing youre right hmmm
n/a Rayfloyd 2017-01-23
People aren't trying to pin the blame on anyone in particular. People on the net found breadcrumbs and now they're following the trail. If the trail leads to Trump you'll hear about it for sure, every stone is turned upside down in this case.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Idk about this. I certainly believe that blame should be pinned on Epstein, Clintons, and Podesta and others as it goes on. People need to have some blame pinned on them for this.
Who decides if the trail leads to him or not, though? I think it's important to keep an open mind and not just sit back and be like "Oh, if he's involved we'll hear about it" because that's how people have been getting away with doing bad things for a long time. I want to be as skeptical of everyone as possible and that quote plus the friendships seem to put him on the same trail as Clinton and Epstein. Just kind of seems like everyone is purposely ignoring any possible connections and that really bugs me. Like you get accused of being a CTR shill or being anti-Trump if you even bring up the quote on Voat and that's wrong in my opinion. I just want to keep an open mind without getting automatically shut down.
n/a Rayfloyd 2017-01-23
Yes of course we can believe it, we'll need law enforcement to do its job too at some point too...
I meant it in a way that if someone finds a lead and it leads to Trump, it is gonna be discussed, and if a link like that exists, you'd bet the MSM would be all over it.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Just for the record- I found out about Trump's Epstein quote through the MSM, not from fellow truth-seekers here or on other forums. It's mostly been buried or completely ignored here which bugs me. I mean, how do you personally feel about that quote?
n/a Rayfloyd 2017-01-23
you mean the quote from 2002? I've seen it being discussed, never gained any traction because it's nothing. He said he knew the guy for 15 years in 2002. His opinion might have changed meanwhile.
n/a FilterBubbles 2017-01-23
He called Epstein out publicly. They don't eat their own like that.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
That's a really good point! Neither of the Clintons have called out Epstein.
n/a dantepicante 2017-01-23
Epstein is a huge target of the investigation - if there's any truth to the Trump connection it will be revealed. Pizzagate is being investigated by many Trump supporters but also citizens with a wide range of political beliefs- this is a serious issue and if the evidence points to Trump being involved, investigators will absolutely talk about it.
n/a dontkillmehillary 2017-01-23
As everyone here has said, the signals aren't pointing to Trump. The few issues that have cropped up with him have either been discredited or lack any significant evidence (circumstantial included). If anything credible comes up to implicate the guy I will happily light the fires to watch him burn with the rest.
As it stands right now there is pretty much a neon sign flashing away saying "Perverts" and it's pointing directly at a handful of individuals. It's logical to follow those leads until they branch off elsewhere.
The quote you mentioned from Trump about Epstein was before the Mar-a-Lago ban, and before Epsteins arrest. I'm sure Stephen Hawking had glowing reviews of Epstein also, considering Epstein reconfigured his submarine on his private island to fit Hawkings wheel chair. That probably doesn't mean Hawking was a pedophile though.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
But why?? Stephen Hawking has at least two kids so we know his penis works. Why does he get a pass? Fucking everyone who set foot on that private island should be investigated, especially someone like Hawking who people would quickly dismiss for being disabled or a nice guy or whatever. This whole "Well if there was evidence..." thing is kind of bullshit. No one is even looking!
n/a dontkillmehillary 2017-01-23
Fair point. I think if we apply Occam's razor though, its pretty likely a guy who needs to eat through a straw is a lot less likely to be raping his way to fame and fortune than a guy who's been caught multiple times and had his presidency impeached over it. That just my opinion though.
n/a bernmont2016 2017-01-23
Beside the point, but I was curious: https://www.quora.com/How-did-Stephen-Hawking-have-children/answer/Derek-Harkness?share=1
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Interesting, thanks! The author seems to imply that his condition has progressed to the point where he probably no longer has control over his penis, although his eyes still work and maybe he likes to watch? Who knows? The point is that we're opening a dialogue about it and tossing ideas around. :)
n/a 1answerNonCompliance 2017-01-23
Hey man, bravo, I'm glad to see some people still out there are noticing the biased nature of pizzagate as far as who "they" are trying to use as the scapegoats of the real conspiracy, the international child trafficking ring and systemic pedophilia used for blackmail and dark spiritual practices.
In my opinion their is probably lots of truth to pizzagate and clearly there are lots of sucpicious things surrounding it. The problem is that it is compartmentalized to this one places. Lots of people are working on connecting the dots but the narrative being pushed the hardest is an attempt to keep it contained to a few scapegoats.
Trump never was or has been an "outsider" which means it is quite likely that somewhere along the line he was either blackmailed or joined the team of the delites. The lack of questioning Trump on this I think comes from multiple things. One being that Trumps campaign ran primarily on filling Americans with that the system we have all seen corrupted with somehow now be allowed to change. His supporters are holding on to this. Can you blame them? So you have an element of confirmation bias coming out of genuine hope. The other part is that since presidents are selected and not elected, they needed a way to keep trumps name out of it. It is likely that shills have infiltrated different discussion boards tasked with damage control as to not implement the new leader in the same scandals while at the same to may possibly set him up to look like a hero.
The truth is the system has not changed with Trump, it's the same system that selected the last President with an extra genius script played out by the media by using people's frustration against them.
However, until Trump takes actions I am willing to reserve judgement. IF he starts truly exposing any corruption people will naturally look into him eventually as well. If he is willing to start locking up delite pedophiles it will be a start and will wake a lot of people up as to what can go on behind their backs and in front of their eyes at the same time. We can only hope more people awaken everyday, but time will tell as far as Trumps true agenda.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Thanks for commenting! You made some very good points. I was starting to get super frustrated at the lack of non-partisan replies I was getting. Nice to know there's still some people out there who are willing to remain skeptical or at least reserve some judgement until more is revealed.
n/a kingpen_1 2017-01-23
Sorry bro--confirmation bias runs rampant here!
n/a cheshire_ranch 2017-01-23
BS. you havent done your research or youd know trump distanced himself from epstein once he knew what was going on.. also sessions/brietbart etc all knew what was up and they are part of trumps cabinet. you are spreading massive disinfo. not cool bro.
n/a 1answerNonCompliance 2017-01-23
Sources? How are you so sure Trump is a legitimate good guy and the info telling you he distanced himself isn't disinfo? How do you know you haven't been tricked into that perception? Do you really think an "outsider" near the system that has strategically selected every President for many years? These are honest questions because of someone could produce some evidence for me that Trump is really some white knight to the rescue I would be very interested to read it. That hasn't happened yet...so until then I will treat him with the same skepticism I treat everyone who wants more power, authority and influence... Just remember you are trusting a billionaire reality TV real estate mogal to watch out for OUR best interests...seems highly unlikely to me.
n/a cheshire_ranch 2017-01-23
i think the fact that the BUSHES (of all people lol)/obama/hillary/soros/media teamed up against trump is good proof hes an outsider, or na?
and i dont think hes a white knight at all bro..but he did start removing troops from syria.. thats great too... or na?
also you can google brietbart and sessions tweets for sources on that. good talk hope we can reach a middle ground here.
n/a 1answerNonCompliance 2017-01-23
Middle ground is always the goal. But you say good talk like I'm done.
So about "everyone teaming up against him" I would say na...it's not proof exactly. That's what I mean by tricking you into that perception. Not saying this IS what's going on but it's certainly the most likely in my perception. I take it you don't trust MSM because lie so easily right? Why could they not lie about being against trump? The media is a way of selling certain public perception, is it so unrealistic that they came up with a script that plays on people's frustration with the system by bashing an "outsider" 24/7. Isn't it more likely they would have Ron pauled his ass if he wasn't part of a plan? The same people that own the media own Hollywood. Surely they could have written a script with only one simple twist...
As far as Brietbart, drudge and other alt media sites they have long since been compromised. Its called controlled opposition. They give slightly more info than the MSM to give the perception they are against them and simultaneously help control the overall narratives. You really think the biggest alt media sites would still be up by now if they were a legit threat?
Lastly, even if trump has been the plan all along like I believe he has, what matters is his actions, until I see him actually go after corruption in an unbiased manner I will stay skeptical.
n/a cheshire_ranch 2017-01-23
yes i agree, his actions.. thats why i showed u 2 actions he did that are pretty good (Syria, tpp)... and what about his congressional term limits idea?.. he was also for universal healthcare a year or so ago...
as for MSM.. they are actually trying to get those sites removed i thought?.. didnt u read the bill a month ago or something that wants to ban all alternative sites accusing them of "russian propaghanda" or somethin?.. the entire MSM was against trump, like legitimately .. if it wasnt for the FBI, hillary would definitely be president
n/a 1answerNonCompliance 2017-01-23
You do realize their are players of this game that stay out of public view...all these things you are reading about are just talk until something actually happens. For example the fact that he pulls troops out of Syria around the same time he is suppose to move the US embassy in Israel from tel Aviv to Jerusalem seems strange since that's gonna piss a whole bunch of Muslims off. Almost like they want the Muslims to attack Israel to give a pretext for a large scale invasion...you see my point? Its all talk until we see his actions and results of those actions. Unfortunately there is too much disinformation out their and too many people on the payroll of the NWO conspiracy that it's virtually impossible to discern the truth. Which is exactly the plan all along.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
William Casey (CIA Director)
n/a cheshire_ranch 2017-01-23
i agree with you.. disinfo is everywhere especially with propaghanda being legalized a couple years ago... but isnt it weird how trump wasnt cia-born and bread like all the other presidents? i dont think its fair to judge him yet until he starts invading countries etc
n/a 1answerNonCompliance 2017-01-23
Like I said, it's all talk...you've jumped to conclusions about trump by things he or other people have only said he wants to do. Audit the Fed? Cool yeah that would be interesting but if that is allowed to happen it's for a very specific reason. I also am not sure what you mean by CIA born and bred, of course presidents have to work closely with the CIA but I'm not sure why you are so convinced that Trump is not apart of that as well.
My point is that they played on people's frustrations about the country and sold everyone the perception that he's an outsider. Its not that hard to see. All this talk about what he says he's gonna do or wants to do is just smoke and mirrors to keep people hoping. Trump will do exactly what it is the real powers that be want him to do.
My suggestion...question EVERYTHING and do your own research. Don't just wait for a news source to say what you wanna hear.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Wow... a lot of great points that I hadn't even begun to consider!
n/a Floof_Poof 2017-01-23
Did you miss where they tried to Ron Paul them?
n/a moparornocar 2017-01-23
trump himself said epstein likes his ladies young.
n/a brasiwsu 2017-01-23
This has been brought up a few times before, but everytime is not a post with any due diligence to offer, just a complaint that the research being done doesn't involve the person you don't like. I don't like trump, I think he's an idiot, so I welcome you to contribute something. No one is stopping you.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Literally mentioned why I was suspicious in my op and other people have contributed some of their suspicions as well. And actually quite a few people in this thread are trying to stop and silence and bully me for thinking which is just fueling my suspicions even more.
n/a brasiwsu 2017-01-23
I want trying to stop you, just saying post something like other people do instead of complaining about what they post.
n/a Kimochiru 2017-01-23
You know, it's such a shame that you're being downvoted en masse. This sub is supposed to be for free thinkers, and that means asking many kinds of questions to uncover more about something. I feel like the point you bring up is a very important one, and it has potential significance in learning more about Pizzagate. I hope Trump is not involved in this as much as the next person, but we need to be objective truth-seekers. I personally appreciate your critical thinking.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Thanks for commenting! I was about to give up on this thread because I'm getting so frustrated. Like I'm talking to willfully deaf people. Makes me sad. This is a great sub for free-thinkers.
n/a marcysharkymoo 2017-01-23
Well you havent replied to the current top comment that i can see asking for proof....
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
I didn't reply because /u/uckthesaints already answered with the same exact thing I was going to say. Idk about you, but I hate when someone bombards me saying the same thing over and over again. And I wasn't going to reply to Uckthesaints by saying "THIS" because that's annoying as well.
n/a marcysharkymoo 2017-01-23
He asked for evidence such as the flight logs.
The flight logs have been released and a can't find Trump on it.
I think trumps a jack ass and all but he's not on that list. Maybe it's outside the time frame, dunno.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Where did I say that? I never said that at all because there's no proof that he did. Please don't put words in my mouth. :( All I said is that they were friends and that Jeffrey was a member of his private club.
n/a marcysharkymoo 2017-01-23
I'm not putting any words in your mouth, It's right there in paragraph 3: "It's known that he was flying with Jeffrey Epstein"
n/a CPU8U 2017-01-23
clapping
n/a freedmason 2017-01-23
It is. We just have lots of people trying to subvert that.
n/a Floof_Poof 2017-01-23
who's downvoting
n/a high_bruce 2017-01-23
lol right. we are being ctr'd the whole sub. its gone.
n/a n00854180t- 2017-01-23
I diddn't downvote but neither is it a mystery why there's no pedo ring connection to Trump: we don't have any damning emails, and he's not self-professed best friends with half a dozen convicted child rapists and traffickers.
The same can't be said for Hillary or Podesta, who frequently brag about being buddies with Dennis Hastert, Laura Silsby and Jeremy Epstein.
n/a Kimochiru 2017-01-23
Yeah, I really hope you're right, and I'm pretty sure Trump didn't participate in these disgusting activities (unlike the others). But you have to admit, he at least knew this kind of ring was going on back then. He even made a tweet in 2012 talking about "sick perverts grabbing our missing children."
n/a hfield_ 2017-01-23
This sub has definitely gone through a partisan take-over, and that hasnt been helped by Mods allowing every post to stay up. However, I've just gotten to the point where I skip any thread with a clearly partisan title.
We're not here for political bickering, we're here for conspiracies, which know have no party loyalty. I wish people would realize that more often than not BOTH parties are in the wrong. Things just arent that black and white.
Anyway, to your point, I think the main reason Trump has not been deeply investigated is because Pizzagate largely caught fire amongst conservatives. It was a story that delegitimized Hillary, and that's all that Trump supporters wanted pre-election.
However, we also still know veryyyy little about the extent of this operation. The politicians that have been accused so far are mostly all tied to the story by emails, close relationships, or spending, and at this point there is no evidence that I know of that involves Trump.
Trump did know Jeffrey Epstein, and he's kind of a freaky dude, so I would not be surprised if he was involved. That said, only time will tell, and if anyone has Trump leads on the Pizzagate front, I would encourage them to follow them.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Fucking thank you. Sometimes I feel like I'm taking crazy pills here and I wish it would go back to the old way of looking at things critically whether or not you have an R or a D next to your name.
Also you make really good points in general, thank you so much for commenting. I was about to give up up on this thread because I was getting so frustrated.
n/a hfield_ 2017-01-23
Any time mate, try not to lose your head in these crazy times. We can maintain this community if we try hard enough
n/a JwPATX 2017-01-23
I'm hopeful that it will wane with time. If the authorities actually make arrests in pizzagate or if CNN would stop trying to openly discredit him, I think a lot of the trumpeters would stay on t_d instead of coming here to yell conspiracy.
n/a WhatIfLove 2017-01-23
Mods take down posts and everything throws a huge fit.
n/a hfield_ 2017-01-23
I know, it's definitely not an easy job for them, and I have much respect for them for dedicating time to keep this sub up and running. But since the election, the quality of posts has absolutely declined, and we even had one moderator resign in protest of the failing state of this sub.
n/a Laotzeiscool 2017-01-23
Lately the liberals have been the bad guys, mainly due to their pro mass migration from muslim countries, and their lying press.
When Bush-Cheney ruled, they were the bad guys, mainly due to their flase flag attack, pnac and oil-wars among others.
Hope Trump will stop the spreading of islam and sharia, fight the big companies and lobbyists, audit the FED, investigate 9/11 and much more. Not fond of his view on climate though.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
I agree 100%. Not super fond of his views on climate either and I'm actually pro-Choice or more accurately, I'd just prefer not to waste time meddling with Roe v Wade and focus on actual important issues. If people want to have abortions just fucking let them do it. The last thing we need is more poor people with more babies running around using up the welfare anyway. I'd rather he focus on stopping our currently insane rate of illegal immigration and no worry so much about pleasing the God-botherers on the Right.
n/a doesnotdeliver 2017-01-23
How do you feel about Trump turning his cabinet into the biggest swamp of elites that has ever been assembled? Do you think his Goldman Sachs and Exxon cabinet will clamp down on Wall Street and big oil?
n/a Laotzeiscool 2017-01-23
I'm worried but remain hopeful to see what they will do. If they let us down, then Trump and his crew is no better than the others before him.
Hope they will take a stand against the saudis as well.
n/a throwtheshitatthem 2017-01-23
There are people who work in such industries that truly believe in free market ideology. They based themselves around it entirely. If these people are those kinds and use their positions more to force companies to compete on level playing fields instead of on that is unlevel due to government regulations / subsidies. Then I am OK with that.
If they can do that and use their massive amount of experience cutting budgets to be more efficient while adjusting tax rates to reflect that then it will all work out great.
Now if they aren't these types of people and they are just looking to push more regulation and subsidies and special tax break favors then yeah fuck'em
n/a doesnotdeliver 2017-01-23
Every piece of corporate history which I'm familiar with shows that executives have a pattern of exploiting workers and resources as much as possible in order to benefit their own titles, salaries and bonuses as much as possible. I don't want this to be how our country is led, yet we are already seeing it in Trump's first week.
n/a rilexusmaximus 2017-01-23
Give us source and we will discuss it. This sub has been brigaded many times with users asking for us to investigate Trump. Thats not how this shit goes. Gives us proof and we can talk about it.
n/a Cuw 2017-01-23
It's because a bunch of the mods are pro-Trump and alt-right so they censor any stuff about Trump. During the campaign they suppressed the Jane Doe case about him raping a 13 year old, they suppressed the rape allegations and Epstein ties, and most recently they have tried to squash any discussion of the Russian ties Trump has, including removing the dossier because of "brigading."
The sub is completely a disinformation campaign for Trump now. Anything that comes up from a critic of his is met with at least downvotes but often deletions, comically biased tags, etc. All during which these mods let an obviously fake "scandal" that revolves around doxxing innocent people who just so happened to have sold pizza to John Podesta.
There is actual evidence Donald Trump is a sexual predator and he is president but all these conspiracies better stay focused on the innocent people with literally no power that own a pizza place, or ran a losing presidential campaign.
n/a NWOShill1 2017-01-23
How can you downplay pizza gate as if it's nothing? Some kid on the internet claiming Alefantis raped him is as good a claim as some girl saying Donald raped her. They are both unverified. Both have some pedo things associated with them, Alefantis has his Instagram and heavy breathing, Trump has his comment about Epstein, his photo with his daughter, and his comment about his daughter.
n/a mastigia 2017-01-23
I'll ask here since it came up, I have asked a few times with no response, could someone please show me the source where it is shown that Trump rode on the lolita express? It should be in a flight logs right?
And you bring up completely valid questions here OP. I would not want to have to deal with Trump professionally, although I voted for him, everything he says is obfuscated in platitudes and fluff. I don't think anyone knows what he is ever really thinking, and that is likely by design.
n/a uckTheSaints 2017-01-23
Trump was friends with Epstein but he also banned him from his clubs once he found out what Epstein was up to.
n/a mastigia 2017-01-23
I've asked this question at least 5 times. I have never gotten so much as a response that addresses it. I'm starting to think it's pure speculation, or just plain made up.
n/a uckTheSaints 2017-01-23
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/09/the-friendship-between-trump-and-a-billionaire-pedophile-that-nobody-wants-to-talk-about/
he had atleast somewhat of a connection to him.
n/a mastigia 2017-01-23
And he disavowed him as soon as it was public. I personally believe Trump was well aware though, I think everyone at that level of socirty knows about the pedophiles.
n/a Loose-ends 2017-01-23
Or more like Netanyahu and Mossad could they wanted to. The same probably goes for any other politicians in Britain or Europe that have a weakness for perverse and illicit sexual activities.
Considering how light his sentence was it's more likely than not that Epstein is one of theirs with a clear and obvious motive of compromising and controlling any important politicians or powerful people in and around the US government for Israel and the Zionists that run it larger ambitions in the Middle-East.
n/a bunnieluv 2017-01-23
He isnttin the flight logs.
Additionally, the court case that was filed revealed that the victim was able to describe Epstein's egg shaped penis, but had no such intimate details of Trump.
n/a mastigia 2017-01-23
I think Trump plays by the rules. The rules are crooked af though. I don't think he had any illusions about how hard he would be attacked and how thoroughly his life would be gone through.
So while I'm sure he knew about it, I don't think he participated. And that doesn't mean I think he is some moralistic puritain lol. He just doesn't break obvious laws, and doesn't engage in vice. He's a weird dude.
n/a throwtheshitatthem 2017-01-23
It shows that in the moment he isn't repulsed by the things going on around him. He still has the cold ability to make judgements on where the lines are that have been drawn by laws and public opinion. That ability to almost look at a situation from an outsider while being inside of it is powerful. I truly believe Trump is some form of a genius just not the kind people understand.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
I sort of agree with this too. His public persona has fooled a lot of people and led them to severely underestimate him. That's one of the things I really like about him.
n/a hrccbr1000rr 2017-01-23
To my knowledge no one will show you this because it doesn't exist. Because he didn't it was floated to cover the Clinton's.
n/a mastigia 2017-01-23
As long as people keep saying it I'll keep asking. It's silly. There are plenty of real things to be upset about.
n/a n00854180t- 2017-01-23
I'm not sure why this is some big question by the OP, considering we don't have a bunch of emails from Trump discussing how they want to bus in kids to play in the hottub as "entertainment", like we do for Podesta.
Plus there are multiple connections to both chidl rapists and child traffickers in those emails, connecting Podesta AND Hillary to people like Laura Silsby (convicted child trafficker) and they are self-professed "close friends" with multiple child rapists, such as Jeremy Epstein and Dennis Hastert.
Man, it's just such a mystery why people think Podesta and Hillary could be involved in child trafficking, since it's totally normal to be best buddies with a half dozen convicted child rapists and traffickers /s
n/a mastigia 2017-01-23
Pizzagate has been derailed by people who either are part of the conspiracy to conceal the fact of elite pedophile rings, or are in complete denial of reality and common sense.
If a bunch of someone's friends fuck kids, what does that say about them? I mean if it was just 1, I could totally see disregarding that. But when they are intimately involved with several people who have are in the public record as proven pedophiles, I don't understand why people have a problem with this math.
I actually don't think any legitimate person has a problem with this math.
n/a larkascend 2017-01-23
Trump probably has had sex with underaged girls - many men have done, particularly wealthy men in past decades.
But pizzagate is much darker than 'statutory rape' , even darker than (on the face of it) Epsteins island hareem of underage sex slaves.
n/a huktheavenged 2017-01-23
The Sons of Dagon!
n/a hardly_har_har 2017-01-23
I thought the case was dropped because of harassment of the plaintiff? That doesn't mean it turned out false, just not true enough to withstand harassment.
Sorry to see this. I really do think r_conspiracy is close to being heavily influenced by pro-Trump propaganda and subtle psy-ops. One of the core tenets of the entire subreddit is that power by its very nature tends to corrupt, obfuscate, and persecute. When a billionaire New Yorker with ancestral wealth, international businesses, and literally millions of dollars of donations to both conservative and republican power brokers of the last twenty years and his cronies form the government suddenly, any skepticism or critique is off the table? That doesn't feel right.
n/a ganooosh 2017-01-23
I thought I read somewhere that trump severed ties with eps tien at some point.
n/a yellowsnow2 2017-01-23
Because Trump is not in the Podesta emails and has no connection to Comet Ping Pong.
n/a pompitous_of_love 2017-01-23
This.
It's like the OP is trying to connect Pizzagate with every other case of pedophilia. If not every case, then at least every case involving a politician or a powerful person. I'm sure that there are thousands of such cases, but they have nothing to do with Pizzagate.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Others are being linked who weren't in the Podesta emails.
n/a freedmason 2017-01-23
I just haven't seen him connected to it. If he raped kids, he deserves to be punished like the rest of them.
n/a Iceboundend 2017-01-23
Trump and clintons are friends are they not? Its the supporters waging war, particularly the actual crazy right.
I think these conmen got a plan z, incase plan A through X fail, trump was the anti-hero pick meant to absorb the vacuum left with bernie supporter dissatisfaction.
Need an investigation, but can you expect trump to do that, fellow orgy buddy? There is one true thing about 2016 - the aboutface the media put in relation to airing bernie - trump coverage was nonstop
Y'all see that too right? A shamboozling that is well documented but nothingi s happening - just like PG
n/a MOISTY_OYSTER 2017-01-23
Put it this way. I have my own opinions on Mr Trump & I intend to keep them to myself.
Perhaps you should have as well.
20/20 hindsight and all that jazz...
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Why? Am I supposed to be scared of voicing my opinion on a conspiracy sub? I'm not afraid of trolls.
n/a know_comment 2017-01-23
I'll throw this out there- Roy Cohn was Trump's lawyer and "mentor". He used his pleasure boat to shuttle sick children to and from children's hospitals, where he spent a lot of time. Cohn also famously relied on sexual blackmail to coerce testimony, and has been accused of being involved in the management of a "pedo book" to compromise politicians and elites...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/former-mccarthy-aide-showed-trump-how-to-exploit-power-and-draw-attention/2016/06/16/e9f44f20-2bf3-11e6-9b37-42985f6a265c_story.htm
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5cyamj/roy_cohn_trumps_mentor_told_nypd_det_james/
Roy Cohn was also the lawyer to the Italian Mafia operating in NYC (among other organized crime syndicates). I think this is an interesting potential tie in to the theory. Anyone ever seen Donnie Brasco? Who is familiar with "The Pizza Connection"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizza_Connection_Trial
n/a huktheavenged 2017-01-23
TIL
n/a know_comment 2017-01-23
well there's very little information about my allegation about the boat. it's true, but you won't find any "proof" of it.
n/a huktheavenged 2017-01-23
all i know about roy cohn i saw in the movie angels in american.
n/a know_comment 2017-01-23
I told kushner about the boat thing, but he was more into the lavendar scare aspect
n/a huktheavenged 2017-01-23
roy cohn is a big subject. a movie can only move so much freight. it's hard to admit what you don't know. i'm just barely keeping up here.
n/a b19pen15 2017-01-23
At what point did you have the opportunity to talk to Tony Kushner?
n/a know_comment 2017-01-23
Did a workshop with him in college
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
That Washington post link doesn't go anywhere fyi. Page not found.
n/a bernmont2016 2017-01-23
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/former-mccarthy-aide-showed-trump-how-to-exploit-power-and-draw-attention/2016/06/16/e9f44f20-2bf3-11e6-9b37-42985f6a265c_story.html
loads for me.
Here's another one: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/21/us/politics/donald-trump-roy-cohn.html
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Thank you!
n/a know_comment 2017-01-23
thanks- https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/former-mccarthy-aide-showed-trump-how-to-exploit-power-and-draw-attention/2016/06/16/e9f44f20-2bf3-11e6-9b37-42985f6a265c_story.html
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Interesting! Thank you!
n/a know_comment 2017-01-23
Cohn was also tight with Roger Stone- who infiltrated the Alex Jones Show and is largely responsible for the crossover audience of the "alt-right" Trump supporters with "Conspiracy Theorists"- as you've pointed to on this thread.
n/a Raptisoft 2017-01-23
Julian assange said they had stuff on Trump, but that all of it was so mild and normal that it wasn't even worth releasing.
n/a Washableaxe 2017-01-23
source?
n/a qrayzhd 2017-01-23
Well lets discuss the conspiracy. Trump didn't only associate himself with Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, Trump has been on flights and hung out with many different celebrities, millionaires and billionaires over the years and the chances that one of them turned out to be a pedophile increases each time. The only claims that have been made about Trump abusing children at an Epstein party were proven false, when the Guardian reported about the false allegations they were threatened by a man who turned out to be a producer on Jerry Springer. Other celebrities have been on flights with Epstein including comedian Chris Tucker and actor Kevin Spacey, it does appear Epstein did charity work with celebs, probably not out of the kindness of his heart, but he did offer lifts to celebrities and those people couldn't have known he was a pedo unless you are prepared to say they are also pedophiles along with Trump, which I think is absurd and without evidence to begin with.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
I personally think there are more pedos in Hollywood than there are non-pedos. There was a guy a while back who was believed to be Robert Downey Jr who anonymously exposed some of it and other former child stars like Corey Feldman have talked at great length about it. And anyway I agree that the allegations against Trump were false, although someone else in this thread said that the charges were dropped under mysterious circumstances so not really proven "false." So idk I guess I'm kind of on the fence about that one.
n/a Shotgun2theDick 2017-01-23
Melania is 24 years younger than Trump, but he's never struck me as the pedo type. He's wasn't sponsoring miss teen usa beauty pageants.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
But wait- he did run the Miss Teen USA pageants though. I thought that was common knowledge, or are you being sarcastic?
n/a b19pen15 2017-01-23
/s?
n/a Shotgun2theDick 2017-01-23
i guess...ahh i knew something was up, if TPTB really wanted him out they would have had him off'd by now or exposed. They're all complicit in it, its the price to pay for absolute power. Fucked up world we live in.
n/a doesnotdeliver 2017-01-23
Most of us got the pedo vibe from him long ago.
evidence A
evidence B
n/a RandyRandle 2017-01-23
Lets not forget, Epstein lived one floor below Trump in Trump Tower, where they hung out together, and Trump's connection to child traffickers like Tevfik Arif, from Bayrock and the Trump Org.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Did he live one floor below Trump? Do you have a source on this or on the child trafficking connection to Trump Org?
n/a RandyRandle 2017-01-23
I may have been off on Epstein's apartment being in Trump Tower, I can't find my original references on that. But, Trump was a frequent guest as his NY home, in any event: https://www.sott.net/article/330739-Jeffrey-Epstein-the-billionaire-pedophile-who-could-bring-down-Donald-Trump-and-Hillary-Clinton
Epstein and John Casablancas, modeling agent for Ivanka at one time, after his conviction: jezebel.com/5603638/meet-the-modeling-agent-who-trafficked-underage-girls-for-sex Epstein a possible investor in MC2 Models with Trump: http://pagesix.com/2007/10/06/model-shop-denies-epstein-tie/?_ga=1.268121166.1737276341.1386222994
Trump Models trafficking in underaged models to work illegally:
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/08/donald-trump-model-management-illegal-immigration
Trump and Casablancas being pals: http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/10/6/1578544/-The-Untold-Story-of-Trump-Model-Management-A-Daily-Kos-Exclusive-Part-1
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/10/25/1586568/-Daily-Beast-Inside-Donald-Trump-s-One-Stop-Parties-Attendees-Recall-Cocaine-and-Very-Young-Models
Tevfik Afir, trafficker, Bayrock exec, possible mobster, and Trump Org VP:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1316831/NY-real-estate-mogul-Tevfik-Arif-arrested-suspicion-running-prostitute-ring.html
Though I’m out of time to hunt down links, there’s plenty more on google. Trump International Escorts (now Mystique Escorts, or something, as of last spring/summer) seems highly suspsious as well. It’s located in NY, has been for years, and despite how protective Trump is of the name, it used the name, and Trump logos, for years. It’s also apparently owned by Multigroup, which is essentially an EEuropean organized crime group that it’s trying to look more legit. Trafficking is/was one if it’s top activities.
And Trump also had those illegal Polish workers, via a contractor, connecting him to another human trafficker of some sort.
n/a secondcomingOFfex 2017-01-23
I just want to see him in the Epstein flight logs. He doesn't appear to be in them unlike others, like Bill Clinton.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Do you think it's because he was smart enough to cover his tracks unlike Bill or do you believe he just wasn't on those flights? I'm not sure what I believe.
n/a secondcomingOFfex 2017-01-23
He wasn't on those flights.
n/a PISS_PRESIDENT 2017-01-23
It was not proven to be false. The woman has dropped her charges twice and we don't know why. She was verified by the courts, there was a court date. There is more proof of Drumpf raping her at 13 years old than in Pizzagate by far.
n/a trytheCOLDchai 2017-01-23
Prove it
She exists
your point is?
this is the only proof I could find
n/a whatsreallygoingon 2017-01-23
I wonder the very same.
n/a marumari77 2017-01-23
I'm brand new as a poster, but a long time lurker. Anyone who becomes "king of the mountain," is, in my opinion, already bought, and prob already sold. I don't think they really matter as much as people think. But, I'm a noon, so wattu I know
n/a marumari77 2017-01-23
Edit: noob
n/a sneakygee_ 2017-01-23
There is nothing stopping you from researching Trump. Problem is where do you begin, people are using information and trails that exist. Yes there are ties to Epstein, same with many rich people who do not get bought up. I assume because there is nothing to go off. If you found any evidence to tie Trump into all this I guarantee many people here will listen.
Personally I'd rather not research any of it because it's a grim ass rabbit hole.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
I'm actually not being downvoted anymore now that rational people have come to the sub. And it's incredibly fucking hard to investigate any links to Trump on my own because there's literally no one else I can bounce ideas or information off of. When everyone calls you a cuck or an Anti-Trump ctr shill for even mentioning a few connections here and there, it seems incredibly suspect and makes it hard to trust anyone.
Also even in this thread I'm noticing one talking point being repeated over and over again that it seems a little rehearsed. "Well if there was any evidence linking him, you'd hear about it" as if people are trying to lead me off the trail or discourage me from looking into it any further.
And I don't really care if people were offended by my edit, I'm not here to babysit anyone's feelings. You can dismiss my opinion as a "Silly jab" if you want, but I was being heavily downvoted until the non-partisan folks showed up like I was being purposefully censored.
n/a sneakygee_ 2017-01-23
I mean I don't doubt that. It's hardly unthinkable that Don has his own team out there pushing an agenda. All that pro Israel stuff a month or so ago was a big red flag.
I think Trump no doubt has skeletons in his closet, just seems there is good evidence on other people which I think makes sense to be most peoples priority. Spit balling is one thing but the real researchers seem best off following the evidence they have.
n/a dantepicante 2017-01-23
From my limited knowledge of the investigation, I can pretty confidently say that no stone is being left unturned with regards to Epstein, and if there's any truth to the connection between him and Trump, it will be investigated thoroughly. As far as I'm aware, that's really the only thing that could type him to the investigation.
n/a uckTheSaints 2017-01-23
Trump kicked Epstein out of his golf club once he found out about his shit.
I think the theory going around is that Trump was friends with Epstein due to both being rich as fuck, once he was in with him Trump became aware of their operation and started planning to stop it. If Trump was implicated in this, then Trump surrogates wouldnt have been mentioning pizzagate before the election
n/a AFuckYou 2017-01-23
I'm going to be honest with you. I think trump IS involved. He has the head of dyncorp as his head top advisor. Steven feinberg.
If your not aware, Dyncorp has DEEP ties to child trafficking
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
That's an integrating connection that I hadn't heard yet. Source on Dyncorp and child trafficking?
n/a atheists4jesus 2017-01-23
I think Trump saying that Epstein like them on the younger side was him kind of being like yo this man is a pedo. He also threw Epstein out of his party for hitting on an underage girl.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Fair point although he still kept Epstein in his inner circle and a member of his private club.
n/a HolyFooT 2017-01-23
Investigation is not the same thing as fair discourse. The evidence leads to the conclusions. You dont just spend equal time speculating about unconnected individuals cause it would be "fair". Clinton/Podesta leaks is the highest profile information leaking I have ever seen. When someone leaks Trumps emails Im sure there will be a community on here tearing them apart like t_d did with podesta. When that happens you will see the post balance shift.
n/a mrevil_tx 2017-01-23
GTFO with this baseless non-subtle attempt to drag President Trump into PizzaGate when there's been no evidence presented to do so.
If you were really concerned, you would be digging into the players and places that have been identified as worthy of being investigated instead of posting up a Trojan Horse of Concern when it's filled with baseless anti-trump motive.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Wow. Even if I was anti-Trump I don't have to "GTFO" of this sub for you or anyone. Quit trying to control my thoughts. If you can't handle some healthy skepticism then maybe this isn't the sub for you.
n/a thesarl 2017-01-23
It's a shame you say you're not here to push a narrative, but that's exactly what you're doing.
It's always "I'm not here to bash (but lol you guys this place has become pro-trump), and we know Clinton trafficked guns and drugs (but I'm not sold on Pizzzagate) and while there is evidence on pedophiles (can anyone actually link to a vetted 100% proven and clear explanation about pizza code) but we should assume Trump is in on it even though Pizzaagate is probably bullshit (did I mention this sub is now T_D?)"
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
You people who are trying so hard to dismiss and silence me are just fueling my suspicions. If you're not bought and paid for then you need to open your eyes.
n/a thesarl 2017-01-23
Eyes are open. That's why I see you. ;)
n/a FilterBubbles 2017-01-23
If Trump is in on it then there is no reason for the media and celebs to continue to bash him. If tptb control both sides so completely, then there is no reason to play charades with themselves releasing leaks on themselves redpilling massive numbers of people to the fact that the media is colluding and basically a hoax. Why destroy your means of control to put someone in power? If you own the system, just install whoever you want to. No questions would have been raised had Hillary won. The msm would happily go on.
What I'm more skeptical of is posts like this one. But maybe you are seriously asking though, and if so, I can only say that the media that has lied to us poorly and transparently for many years despises Trump with a passion that is more genuine than any of the false flags they have ever perpetrated on us. That tells me something.
n/a NWOShill1 2017-01-23
Just because he's not in on it doesn't mean he isn't a pedo.
n/a FilterBubbles 2017-01-23
It's a pretty safe bet that if a bunch of corrupt satanic pedophiles despise him, it's not just because he doesn't pick up the check when they go out for pizza.
If you're saying he's a pedophile independent of the giant ring of pedophiles that is implicated, then I think we'd need to find some real evidence to support that. But IF he is, then as long as he takes the rest down, he can hang last. But I'm just not seeing it.
n/a liamwong 2017-01-23
Your father could be a pedo, your mom could be prostitute
Just because you're here posting idiot logic doesn't mean your parents didn't try to abort you
n/a Ambiguously_Ironic 2017-01-23
Rule 10, first warning.
n/a NWOShill1 2017-01-23
I'm Pretty sure that guy is just too high to see that you actually made a good post. He didn't differentiate it from the red-scare posters, who's agenda is pretty much unacceptable to a lot of us, honest poster or not. I think you bring up good points. He may be a pedo. Epstein might collect blackmail material for NWO. Donald may be blackmailed, but since he isn't toeing the official narrative line, I think he has some kind of counter-blackmail or something preventing them from dealing with him. Or maybe that's just a highdea lol. Anyway, I think Trump should be good, pedo or not.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Honestly I agree with this. I like Trump a lot. I voted for him. But I'm not going to be one those rabid "SHUT UP ABOUT THE GOD-EMPEROR" people because I refuse to shut my brain off no matter how much I like someone. Lets not forget that he still has our best interests at heart regardless of whether or not he's involved in some shit.
n/a transcendReality 2017-01-23
He has been looked into, he has been linked to it.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Look around this thread- the vast majority are saying there's no link and that I should shut up and leave it alone or else I'm an anti-Trump shill. The rest are saying there may be a link but there's nothing solid yet. I can't agree with you that he's definitely been linked to it. There's suspicion but no real link yet or at all.
n/a transcendReality 2017-01-23
All we have is suspicion with most of these people. Only a very few have ever been prosecuted. Trump is just too close to Epstein, and has made too many trips to his private island on the "Lolita Express".
n/a 8toborrm 2017-01-23
Yo. Don't take it personally. You know that this is a quality thread. it is a quality thread. Chill. You did good. CTR is easily tied to the DNC. Most people simply stop there, assuming they are the only group out there doing it. I'm sure there's tens of thousands of trump bots out there, on twitter, etc. I haven't seen evidence but it's one of those things I do just assume. I could very well be wrong.
Ok, your post isn't getting downvoted because it's anti-trump. It's getting downvoted because it's about-pizzagate. Plain and simple, brother. Check other pizzagate threads. LOTS of discussion, few upvotes. Disproportionate to any other topic, even sandy hook. (although sandy hook similar situation)
Yes, Trump has made comments that would make you think he's right there with Epstein flying to the island and conducting ceremonies in the underground lair. His quote (re: Epstein) came out several months ago, and you bet your sweet ass people were digging into it. There simply hasn't been much found since then, afaik. That quote right there is the most damning evidence on him. Is it because nobody is looking? I think you're a bit confused about WHO is doing the gruntwork behind the investigation... It's people who are concerned for the potential children involved. Majority not driven by political parties. Because once (if) you begin to accept it as a possibility you'll see it transcends the bullshit left v. right.
Pizzagate is slow and greuling. Another reason Trump hasn't been tagged in PG is because PG goes where the evidence leads the investigation. evidence hasn't lead it to him yet. Well - it does - through the Epstein connection, but then it drops off. Trump bans epstein from one of his Flordia clubs (mar-a-lago I think?) and the relationship seems to end. It's not like people are researching democrats scrutinizing every time they ordered dominoes on the company card. The evidence is what steers PG. If it leads to Trump it leads to Trump.
And in essence that's the beauty of it right there. You're not going to see a headline on reddit providing you evidence that Trump is just as sick as the rest of them.. You're going to research it, and you're going to write it yourself. Let your genuine curiosity and sense of right and wrong take over, and start looking around. You'll be surprised at what you find.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Thanks for commenting, I appreciate your point of view. I think I reacted too hastily about the downvotes in the beginning. This post took a huge swing downward then went back up as soon as rational people like you came along. You've made some very good points, I appreciate you!
n/a doesnotdeliver 2017-01-23
You already know the answer. It is a conspiracy fabricated entirely to discredit Clinton during the election. Some people didn't get the memo that the election is over and actually bought into it. What's the point in linking it to the one person it was designed to help?
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Do you honestly believe that? Even after reading the emails and looking at some of the very real connections that have been made? The Jeffrey Epstein/Bill Clinton thing is very very real. There's no question that he flew on the "Lolita Express" plane with him many many times.
n/a doesnotdeliver 2017-01-23
Do I believe that? Absolutely. All of the evidence has been tenuous at best.
How about you bring up one or two of the pieces of evidence which you feel support the story the most strongly and we can discuss those.
We know that Epstein was doing despicable things with underage children and I'm sure that Bill Clinton and Donald Trump were both provided ample opportunities to join in. My strong suspicion is that both of them probably did, too. However, I don't think that this has any relationship with Podesta or Comet Ping Pong Pizza.
n/a Thoutzan 2017-01-23
Came from one of the most totalitarian state, my five cents is, do go mysophobia in regards to politics. Accept the fact that all politicians are dirty, all representatives have their greedy agendas, and no messiah of perfection will come and save us. Accept these facts, judge our position and give the lesser evil a pass.
We the cattles are playing a 3D chess with the cabals. Anyone wins we lose. What we need to do is to support the cabal that is at a disadventage (like the one who's besieged by ALL MSM) and has some agenda that aligns with our wellness (anti migrants, anti TPP, audit Fed).
If everyone is mysophobia and vote neither candidates in this election, that will give the cheating HRC a free pass to WH, leading to the worst case senario.
TDLR, be pragmatic, be result-driven, support the lesser evil.
n/a veryearlyonemorning 2017-01-23
Do you see now? This sub is completely overrun by pro-Trump shills. Trump has plenty in his life, both past and current, to warrant an in-depth look. You would think a conspiracy theorist would be interested in something like that.
The bigger conspiracy here is that these guys have been pumped so full of Russian propaganda that they don't see ironic position they find themselves.
n/a n00854180t- 2017-01-23
TIL if you don't blindly suck down the Red Scare 2.0 narrative the MSM is pushing, you aren't a REAL conspiracy theorist.
Because apparently the hallmark of a conspiracy theorist is blind faith in whatever narrative the MSM is peddling today. /s
n/a veryearlyonemorning 2017-01-23
No the hallmark of a conspiracy theorist is a paranoid thought process that betrays a lack of understanding that most people aren't like that.
I have a conspiracy theorist mindset - you have the mindset of a partisan whose sarcasm is weak. Sad!
n/a FrankGreen_12 2017-01-23
There's no evidence linking him to it, that I'm aware of. There is currently no hard evidence linking anyone to a specific crime.
However, that doesn't prove that nothing happened. How is the average civilian going to obtain such evidence? You won't find incriminating photos of high level politicians underneath the fridge. This doesn't mean that they haven't engaged in anything questionable, pizzagate or otherwise.
It's also rarely ever mentioned that dealing in such incriminating evidence would be a life/death situation for the people involved. If the accusations are to be believed, the people implicated would have no problem killing off someone to avoid exposure.
Lastly, if this is really occurring, Republicans are almost certainly in on it as well. If not, they'd have taken advantage and exposed it -but they're not going to do that if their own people are implicated. We already know of one who got busted, Dennis Hastert. he is mentioned by name in Podesta e-mails along with the bizarre phrase "This traffic is really warm and really weird in light of Hastert. Boy that's sad."
It shouldn't be a partisan issue, but it inevitably becomes one because a lot of people are incapable of thinking outside the Red/Blue box.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Thank you for this and the rest of your comment. The DNC hacks/Podesta emails, and other info that's been leaked about the Democrats really makes me wonder 1) What are they hiding over on the Right because everyone knows there's virtually no difference between the DNC and the RNC and 2) Why hasn't anyone even made an attempt to hack them yet? No one can tell me it's just that "DNC servers were more vulnerable" or whatever because that's bullshit. Also I distinctly remember Pence fighting tooth and nail to make sure his emails never got made public record.
n/a silkenindiana 2017-01-23
Ya the whole trump vs Hillary thing has really clouded our ability to discuss this shit rationally. The closer we get to the truth the more obfuscated things become. This seems to be manufactured and I would advice you not to let the CTR/ Trump equivalent to misdirect your efforts. I've stopped arguing points I know to be true, like when someone comes in saying Hillary has never broken the law and isn't corrupt. Why bother to give them the piles of evidence to the contrary? Never had this resulted in a "o wow I never realized how wrong I was. Thanks for bringing this to my attention." It is met with brazen denial and deflection. They are here to give the appearance of opposition, that they have no leg to stand on doesn't matter. People casually viewing, and forming an opinion, see people rallying against it. Even if they are demonstrably wrong, it looks like the jury is out.
n/a Preacher_1893 2017-01-23
Just so you know Trump praises everyone irrespective of the background of the person,I saw the Indian Trump meet,in which he said we all love Hindu people,we all love India,he is a businessman,he doesn't maintain no fuss with anyone,I am from India and no our demography is quite different from what he suggested,the same thing with Epstien,just for the sake of moment he praised him.
The guy wholeheartedly congratulated Obama during inauguration,it was in his expression,no wonder the TPTB ridiculed him and even Obama who has nothing to do with next term has ridiculed him.
So,that Epstien Quote that he is a terrific guy is just a way of mediocre say for Donald,that's his Make America Great Again rhetoric,that's why I don't take this guys word as ultimate confirmation of his quality,this guy is a kid,he has good intentions and he is smart.
Anyway its my personal feeling that he is kind of good in his heart and has a better intention for this world,apart from that every fact has to be questioned.
n/a leo_rugiet 2017-01-23
trump is a genius whether people like it or not. what he says is calculated, and is said to achieve a specific goal in mind. you are correct in saying all that. anyone who disagrees has obviously not read the art of the deal.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Thank you for commenting, that's actually a really really good point.
n/a leo_rugiet 2017-01-23
OP I don't think you understand what's going on here.... The Anti-Trumpers are high jacking the Pizzagate story and trying to pin it on Trump. They come up with all this speculation, and lead people to believe things he is only "alleged" to have done. And when people criticize that, they are labeled as part of the problem, or not free thinkers, ignorant, under pro trump, etc.
I have witnessed this first hand, especially in asking questions about specific evidence or logs. ITS ALL SPECULATION AND THEY ARE FLIPPING PIZZAGATE ON HIM.
n/a FilterBubbles 2017-01-23
I think OP "understands" exactly what is going on here.
n/a snakedhill 2017-01-23
Great post man
n/a trishpee 2017-01-23
Great post, I feel similar to you and I am also mainly a lurker of this sub. I really don't want to believe trump is part of it, but honestly I feel he probably has played a part and was probably better at covering his tracks. I just don't see anybody in that position of power having no skeletons in their closet.
n/a harambe_ii 2017-01-23
First, have an upvote for being willing to question your preferred candidate. Second, I saw a video during the election that noted Trump flew only one time with Epstein, and they subsequently had a falling out. Sorry, I don't have a link.
My takeaway is that it's reasonable to question Trump's involvement, but at this point (after skimming the other comments here), I see no reason at all actually to suspect Trump.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Thanks for commenting! I was about to give up on this thread because I'm getting so frustrated. Like I'm talking to willfully deaf people. Makes me sad. This is a great sub for free-thinkers.
n/a CPU8U 2017-01-23
clapping
n/a freedmason 2017-01-23
It is. We just have lots of people trying to subvert that.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
But wait- he did run the Miss Teen USA pageants though. I thought that was common knowledge, or are you being sarcastic?
n/a b19pen15 2017-01-23
/s?
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Why? Am I supposed to be scared of voicing my opinion on a conspiracy sub? I'm not afraid of trolls.
n/a doesnotdeliver 2017-01-23
Most of us got the pedo vibe from him long ago.
evidence A
evidence B
n/a Floof_Poof 2017-01-23
who's downvoting
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
Where did I say that? I never said that at all because there's no proof that he did. Please don't put words in my mouth. :( All I said is that they were friends and that Jeffrey was a member of his private club.
n/a CumFreeSox 2017-01-23
I sort of agree with this too. His public persona has fooled a lot of people and led them to severely underestimate him. That's one of the things I really like about him.
n/a hfield_ 2017-01-23
I know, it's definitely not an easy job for them, and I have much respect for them for dedicating time to keep this sub up and running. But since the election, the quality of posts has absolutely declined, and we even had one moderator resign in protest of the failing state of this sub.
n/a n00854180t- 2017-01-23
I diddn't downvote but neither is it a mystery why there's no pedo ring connection to Trump: we don't have any damning emails, and he's not self-professed best friends with half a dozen convicted child rapists and traffickers.
The same can't be said for Hillary or Podesta, who frequently brag about being buddies with Dennis Hastert, Laura Silsby and Jeremy Epstein.