And if he runs, he will probably win. HRC's problem was that she only had influence on the mainstream media, but not the right wing outlets. Facebook on the other hand has no political borders. President Zuckerberg omfg....

Hillary didn't win because she wasn't selected

She was sure as shit selected by TPTB, if that's what you mean. They are powerful, but they are not gods.

Uh. Have you seen her donors. Have you seen what Trump has done in a week?

If he runs, facebook needs to be terminated beforehand, well in advance, otherwise that 100% is an illegitimate presidency IMO.

What were your thoughts on how Trump handled his potential conflicts of interest?

Two completely different topics.

Both determine their actions while in the white house.

However, Zuckerberg can ensure he gets elected through his control of facebook - which is also why I said, it needs to be shut down, not transferred to a different owner well before he runs. Even selling it, the owners/employees would have loyalty to Zuckerberg which would lead to a worse situation than CTR was on reddit.

Determining whom becomes president is worse, because conflicts of interest are always going to happen, we will never have a broke president.

he wont make it as an independent and at this point both parties are running towards their extremes.

If he really does run for president I want the Winklevoss twins to run against him.

They would split the vote.

The Winklevii

My vote is for Tom.

Bitcoin!

What about the Bogdanoff twins? Is America ready to take the Bogpill?

An identical twin president would be very interesting.

Eh. Idk about that. I feel like zuck is pretty universally hated.

Doesn't matter, Trump was/is widely hated, too. Wasn't the voter turnout ~60% this election? This means you could still get elected if at least 30% percent of the population like and vote for you.

That's an excellent point, but don't you think everyone will have abandoned fb by then? I mean- it's zuck.

I really hope that, but FB is already 8 years old. It will likely survive another 3-4 years. Even if teenagers won't use it anymore, older demographics probably will :/

Ugh this is nightmare fuel. I usually dig r/conspiracy but your (perfectly logical) logic has killed me down. I need a bubble-bath to wash off this thought! Ack.

but FB is already 8 years old

It was officially launched (just about) 13 years ago, and open to the public roughly 10 years ago. Just clarifying, not trying to pick a fight or anything.

I will always upvote accurate information

My poop smells like poop.

Mine smells more like farts

IAUAI

I sadly don't see any reason it won't last forever. People are addicted. Just like TV. There aren't enough principled/aware people to put a dent in its endlessly growing membership.

Trump had charisma and knew how to work the media.

Zuckerberg has neither. He's just a rich guy.

Trump was fiercely loved by that small percent though. I don't think there are very many people who "fiercely" love zuck

The media will prop him up and tell us that he's universally loved.

Ask Hillary Clinton how that works out.

It actually worked pretty well. She screwed herself over by not campaigning enough in states that flipped red.

I mean it wasn't long ago that SNL was mocking Hillary for being a compulsive liar. Pop culture swings so fast. Now people believe shes a champion for women.

She screwed herself over by not campaigning enough in states that flipped red. promoting Trump as the GOP candidate to distract from Sanders and emails

FTFY

Well both.

Bbbut her emails!

Wait...Am I doing this right?

He owns Facebook.. He wouldn't allow anti mark, he would project himself as the best candidate there. And since FB is extremely powerful, they would reach out to Instagram and Twitter.. He would devour social media and slander his opponent.

Let's just hope he will not run.

If that were to happen, then I think that would result in the death of the first gen of social media. I've already seen a lot of independent digital media platforms emerge over the past year.

Yeah, none of which gained traction and none of which are actually a threat to FB

Reddit. I use it exclusively and haven't used FB in years.

But Reddit is a very different kind of platform. Imo it's based around content and discussion and much less around the individual and social circles.

I try to developer those things in real life. Believe it or not, it's more satisfying.

I agree with you, but most people want a digital social network in their life. Reddit can't replace Facebook in that sense.

You're what's known as an exception

Social networks are social media, and reddit is social media, it's just not a social network.

Social media sites all pretty much have the same content though, presented in differing ways.

Reddit is also almost the same age as facebook - not a newer generation of social media, the same generation.

Which is exactly why I enjoy reddit more than I did enjoy fb

And is still kind of a fucked up site

spez

Hey man, G+ is gonna take off any day now, just you wait.

Now, sure. But in 2020, who knows?

Facebook owns Instagram I believe.

Is this true?

True story.

Big if true.

The alternative truth is that they don't.

Family has FB stock, they also own a couple of the other big ones

Tried to get him to sell when they updated their "fake news" filter

It is true, I don't see how this is a big deal though. They've owned it for a while

They also own WhatsApp. Not that unknown I guess.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mergers_and_acquisitions_by_Facebook

Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mergers_and_acquisitions_by_Facebook

^{HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 22085}

And WhatsApp, he'll know when you've been naughty or nice.

Yes. And they also own whatsapp...

And Oculus

lol this sub kills me. "they're extremely powerful, they would reach out to Instagram and Twitter" and the 154 upvotes (at this moment) proves how much talking out of the ass at least some people do here, and the willing support people give it without researching it.

It'd probably be the biggest conflict of interest in history. He'd have to completely divest and even then anything fb put out about him would be held to extreme prejudice. Also I dont use fb, fuck that guy.

lol you are implying that anyone will care about conflict of interest as if anyone does now. By 2020 USA will be the first incorporated nation.

Well it's nigh on impossible to muddy the waters of the connection is all I meant. u r the japanese guy isolated on the island still fighting wwii discovered in 1980 if you dont know zuck the cuck owns fb

THE UNITED STATES is already a corporation.

i disagree. its a conglomeration of corporations hiding behind a veil

Wouldn't that be a massive conflict of interest?

Hes one of the weakest of liberal cucks.

8 years of President Trump....

Using your terminology, President Trump and Mark Zuckerburg are both weak "cucks". They just happen to come from different sides of the political spectrum.

Thats where you're wrong kiddo.

They tried the same with Clinton. Clinton had the "experience", the vagina, and the name fame. All of the news outlets and social media sites couldn't stump the trump

The problem with Hillary and even Jen was that no one wanted to see another "Clinton" or "Bush" career politician in the White House. Whether this was good or not who knows. And the media could have shut down trump just like they did Bernie, stop talking about him 24/7. But they knew he was a good story and didn't pose nearly the threat they thought he did so the put him on screen non-stop to create a narrative and get big viewership.

You're talking about Bill, right?

No he's the one who assaults vaginas. Close though.

And this election truly showed us, that if media projects one candidate as the best candidate and slanders the opponent, it will definetily result in said candidate victory, with an opponent having less than 1% chance to win /s

Sarah Palin would be better 😳

And he owns WhatsApp as well

Please. If he did that he'd immediately be seen as an oppressive tyrant. He'd lose before he started.

he won't even allow you to have facebook if you're mark zuckerberg http://oddculture.com/mark-zuckerberg-banned-from-facebook/

Everyone thought trump was just a loser and a Slime bag, now he's the loser and slime bag in Chief, vote and never assume who will win.

His reputation is turning around now that hes donating to charities. On one hand it's better than having his money sit around doing nothing, on the other hand its clearly a play to build his reputation and it seems like he'll be exploiting it soon to get a seat in D.C.

I mean.... Trump's pretty universally hated too, but....

I think Eric Schmidt could make a much stronger run. He's been around longer, is a bit older, is the son of a psychologist mother and a professor of international economics at V Tech and JHU father (who spent time in the Treasury under Nixon).

He's an overall computer nerd with a PhD, he's worth over $10 billion, was the CEO of Google. Sat on boards or was employed at Apple, Sun, Novell, Bell Labs, Xerox's PARC (a huge deal back in the day), several universities, and The Economist. Founded an investment firm that invested in Uber. Campaigned for Obama and served on his science and tech panel, and currently sits as chairman of the DoD Innovation board. A member of Bilderberg, he's worked alongside just about every powerful person, organization, and government in the western world.

He's a filthy rich businessman (which conservatives love), from the tech sector (which progressives love), and he's got the friends in high places to make things happen. And most importantly, his tech ties would net him even more control over trending internet news than Zucks would get on Facebook alone.

He also has a history of lobbying with the elites. Read Julian Assange's view of him in 'When Google met Wikileaks' for a better idea.

Im a liberal and Id rather vote for Trump's toupee than Zuckerberg.

Out of curiosity, can you explain your reasoning

Trump has great hair.

Stephen Colbert can change that.

I don't think so at all. He founded the company that a good percentage of the globe uses. I think he's respected and liked by a lot of people.

Trump would destroy him.

So is Hillary. But she almost won.

For people who actually read about him and know what he has done and what facebook is. For most of America... idiots... they idolize him almost as much as Steve Jobs.

Of course they will. They love billionaires now. As long as he tells them what they want to hear and riles them up against the others they will line up to vote for the billionaire oligarchs who have been spitting on them.

Exactly. It's like the people never learn

Trumps actually doing it tho.. So

Hitlery supporters love to ignore reality in favor of their feelings... don't expect them to stop now.

So much winning!

It's almost like as if the old posh republican vs posh democrat game was merely replaced by modern internet comprising solely of rabid 4chan altrighters and hysterical tumblr sjws.

That's the only reason he claims he's not an atheist anymore. To pander to Americans.

Gee whiz, I was wondering what this smug Silicon Asshole was doing with his "new found spiritualism" and shit.

For reference:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/12/30/mark-zuckerberg-says-hes-no-longer-an-atheist-believes-religion-is-very-important/

HAHAHAHA

HAHAHAHA

Yes religion is very important....So that you can appeal to the masses and convince them you all believe in the same things.

RemindMe! 3 years

OH SHIT HE REALLY IS A JEW LOLOLOL

Break out the lube and prep the sheeple..

So he's one more cuck in a sea of anti-American cucks, now is he?

That's the only reason he claims he's not an atheist anymore. To pander to Americans.

This is a great point that never crossed my mind. Usually these 'reborn' religious people do so out of a need to avoid accountability for their past mistakes. Very interesting for somebody to be doing it out of a need for future success.

Remindme! 4 years "does faggotberg run for president?"

I will be messaging you on 2021-01-24 01:04:36 UTC to remind you of this link.

CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.

^{Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.}

Well that's certainly too late.

You could probably set that for like 3 years and get and find out

I hope Americans shut that shit down fast if he runs for president.

Please dont

What happened to glenn messed me up

We can still blame daryl

Won't happen for one simple reason: he has dirt on everyone who has used FB.

And imagine the news feed in fb when he starts campaigning.

I would rather go deaf,dumb & blind than to have to witness that nightmare.

Sign out. /s

Facebook internet pass coming to you

As of November 1st 2021, government issued facebook internet passports will be available in our bronze, silver and gold packages

Suspect someone of using the internet illegally? Report them and if the report yields a 5+ year prison sentence you will recieve a free 6 month package bump

Bronze 19.99$

Silver 1,200$

Gold 1,200,000$

The disturbing thing about your post is that I can certainly see something like that happening in the future, whether near or distant.

Huxleytown

:(

That's some Black Mirror material right there.

HONESTLY if it got to that point I would stop giving a fuck and just do whatever I want regardless of the consequences

10 hits of molly, mainline bath salts, and hit a meth pipe, grab an AR-15, strip naked, put on some ice skates, and see how far across the White House lawn you could run while firing rounds to the sky

10 hits of molly, mainline bath salts, and hit a meth pipe, grab an AR-15, strip naked, put on some ice skates, and see how far across the White House lawn you could run while firing rounds to the sky

Lmao I was with you until the ice skates. How am I supposed to escape? Lol.

Well you did say "regardless of the consequences"!

Hahaha I'll concede to that! Just for the hilarity of it all.

Haha yeah, it gave me a pretty great mental image. Except in my brain you look exactly like Escape From LA era Kurt Russell.

Lmao you aren't far off

So you you have an eye patch?

i think once you get to the white house lawn you get rid of any chance of escape anyway so might as well do it in skates.

Probably not too far considering the catastrophic heart failure you would have while trying to put on your ice skates.

world wide web alternatives do exist

So 'we' will get to watch him fuck a pig live?

Please I wanna see this

Why... I had successfully wiped that episode from my memory. It took me so long.. and you ruined everything. D:<

There is a Black Mirror episode that is about this premise almost exactly...

You mean the one in which people up vote or down vote other people with their phones and that gives them access to certain things like discounts and stuff?

Correct.

I would love to see that

You can see something happen in he distant future? Well sure. A lot will happen.

In the distant future a robot will be the POTUS. Better destroy all robots now.

https://youtu.be/lHcTKWiZ8sI this is what China is going to use by 2020

I dont want to live in this future:(

They've already revealed plans to build their own transatlantic internet cables just for their own use

Hey man, these billion dollar evaluations didn't just drop out of the sky...

Delete this comment before someone important sees it and gets any ideas.

Of he puts the dollar sign at the end of the number like that, I'm leaving the country.

Well shit, sign me up! As long as big brother's still got my back we good

Goodluck making the jump from silver to gold, you'll only rat on your own blood for that unlimited youtube and reddit minutes

This should not be sarcasm

I just didn't want to be down voted for sounding like a smartass

Zuckerberg has the charisma of a damp squib. He won't go far.

Zuck thinks it's data and analytics that makes for a winning campaign (like Hillary). It's actually just sheer charisma.

Obama pulled through on charisma, so did Bill and of course Trump. Even Bush had the goofy uncle vibe Al Gore just didn't have

If zuckerberg takes the dem nomination from sanders in 2020, there's going to be hell to pay.

I think a significant amount of Trump's win was policy. There are a lot of people concerned about immigration and a lot of manual labourers affected by unemployment.

And a lot of people really hate the fact the left tries to control language.

People keep saying "how could an idiot like that win?" Well, policy isn't affected by crazy hair or whatever else. I think a lot of people just preferred his policies.

Nah man, racists just finally came out of the woods to support someone with a personality that matched theirs. Hillary was dumb to ignore the white vote :\

Well, that would be policy. But I think it's bullshit. Trump had the highest minority vote of any republican for decades.

Aww come on dont bring facts in to this

Charisma is a huge factor but one of trumps biggest supporters was Robert Mercer who owns 1 of the worlds largest Data companies. He was hired by trump during the election and they use Facebook data almost exclusively. His employees include several members of Trumps team such as Steve Bannon and Kellyanne Conway.

Well another major Trump supporter was Peter Thiel, who probably owns the closest thing we have to a private NSA

The ironic thing is that charisma is one of the characteristics of a sociopath, and sociopaths have a tendency to end up in positions of power. I'm not saying, I'm just saying. Charisma wins us over but sometimes it's bullshit.

I'm sure they will have true voting via Facebook, for our protection. Would be fun to see Trump attack him though...

Aw dude I just threw up in my mouth.

Facebook is hosing users out it's ass though, right? Stock dropping, daily hourly usage dropping, new user sign-up rate dropping.

I mean, OP brought nothing to the table except a post title, but I'd still be shocked if Facebook was even half it's current size by 2020 - in it's current form, at least.

Of course there are less new users signing up, there's only so many people in the world with access to facebook, and pretty much all of them already have it

Oh he could spread positive b.s out rather easily

Not all people let their dirt be exposed to FB, I would imagine... But even still, not everyone has dirt and not everyone has Facebook!

Zuckerberg would be garbage for president.

You have to understand that facebook doesn't just know what you post on their site. They literally track everything you do.

Ever go on facebook and see the ads? They know what sites you go to. They know what you search for.

Do you have the facebook messenger app installed on your phone? Congrats, they read your text messages, and give you ads based on keywords.

It's a really shiesty operation they have.

Every single site that has facebook comments, like buttons or any facebook script running on the page tells facebook you visited that page if you are logged in(most do it automatically).

That includes pornhub and a bunch of other sites.

Most people don't realise how much fb knows about them.

I wouldn't be surprised if they were listening to you talking from the app on your friend's phone and making you a "shadow profile" even without you ever having an account. Or even matching you to your account.

I use ad block and no mobile use at all. I use FB only to keep up with some political groups. I deleted my account 5 years ago and recently re activated it. It was like I had not missed a post in the entire time.

FB is forever.

Ok. They still know everything you do though.

Just get off fb... you would be surprised how nice it is, instead of spending spare time looking at other people's bullshit you can focus on your own.

I don't have one anymore.

1) incognito window thwarts tracking cookies

2) I don't have that app installed for that very reason!

And that messenger app requires you to allow them to take audio, videos, and pictures from your phone at any time without your permission or knowledge.

I've been on the internet since 1994, starting in AOL chat.90% of my online activity has been under my real name, so so close someone could easily figure it out (no, that is not a challenge LOL).

This openness has served me well. There is nothing I have EVER typed I am ashamed of, or would not want anyone to know about me.

While I understand the desire for anonymity I never grasped the need as something practical.

Dirt. Meh.

dam son.

Dirt through Facebook don't make me laugh

im clean then

They also track you when you're not in FB.

Which Americans? The imbeciles who never figured out JFK, RFK, MLK, Bob Marley, John Lennon, The USS Liberty and 911...

question, what happeed to bob marley, john lennon ?

Apparently Bob Marley was suicided by his manager. Not sure about John Lennon though.

got any good sources i maybe able to do research from?

Marley: https://www.google.com/search?q=bob+marley+conspiracy+theory&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8

Lennon: https://www.google.com/search?q=john+lennon+conspiracy+theory&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8

Oh. It WASN'T Stephen King?

Makes for one hell of a novel though.

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

NO it was Gordon Hunt, one of the Hunt Brothers. It was a cancer virus attached to a needle. The needle was built into a pair of custom boots that Hunt insisted Bob put on.

They then convinced Bob to go to a 'special doctor' in Europe, who finished his cancer off with accelerating drugs.

The CIA was concerned Marley would become the next Global JFK or Mandella, so they had him killed.

I remember this from a rolling stone article many decades ago.

Yeah I'm curious too!

Also, I'm wondering if there's anything else I don't know about the Pat Tillman thing.

As far as I know, if I'm remembering correctly, there was absolutely a cover up about how he died. Like, they knew he died via friendly fire, but let the public think it was from enemy fire for quite a while (presumably to use him as a hero figure and gain more recruits?)

I remember reading that his brother (I think?) had said Pat was getting very disillusioned by the entire thing and that he felt like we (US) were there for the wrong reasons.

So, are there theories that he was maybe killed on purpose by our government or something? I'd love to know any extra info on all that.

could tell me a littl ebit more about pat tillman. google says he is ex footballer leaving the sports for army?

Google should be telling you a lot more than that.

The fact that this is all Google is saying is pretty telling.

google said more too, but i got to say nowadays, me and google have been going through a rough patch. we don't talk tht much anymore. like we used to dooo...

I'm sorry to hear that. Maybe some counseling is in order.

Google is a search engine remember

3 pops to the dome

Apparently he confided in chomsky. I reckon that was what got him killed. Chomsky is a spook gatekeeper imo.

yeah Chomsky probably immediately called the CIA "he's on to us!"

Bob died of cancer and John Lennon was murdererd by a crazy fan. However, what they both had in common was that they were speaking out against the establishment AND had huge followings. I guess the conspiracy here is that once you get famous enough, and a big enough following, they take you out. There are maney examples of this; JFK, Martin Luther King, Lennon etc. Bill Hicks has a joke on what happens to all the good guys right here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFHVkdxSzTM

i know a lot abt the JFK stuff. and to be honest, i had no clue about bob marley's death linked with the establishment

Watch the Marley (2012) doco amd have a look for a High Times article about the marley conspiracy. He was becoming quite politically powerful. America didn't want a legitimate leader or socialist jamaica on their door step. The story is it was a cancer laced needle in a pair of boots he was gifted.

"cancer laced" -- are you implying "cancer" is some type of virus, fungus, or bacterial agent?

I'm implying that it can be generated through intention. Not sure what the vector is for the carcinogen. I'd say that info would be in a secret folder, because to understand the mechanism would mean it'd be possible to get a cure. That's no good for pharma profits.

Cancer isn't a type of any of those things, but it can be caused by all of them. Types of viruses, molds, and bacteria have all been linked to different types of cancer.

Lol... what an idiot, conspiracies still need to be possible

I should have put an /s at the end of it :)

Not you the other guy

with Lennon, the security standing there when he was gunned down by chapman just happened to be ex CIA. Just a coincidence. Ex Cia Guys always need to get min wage jobs.

murdered by the 3 letter agencies

John Lennon was killed by Steven King.

Not sure if that's what he's referring to but it's one of the things I check into every now and then.

The Gulf of Tonkin. Marlilyn Monroe. Paul McCarthy. Operation Paperclip. Projects MK Ultra and MK Often.

Should I throw pizzagate on tho this list or is it too soon?

Oh please, not the real paul is dead crap. Theres no way that one is true.

I actually think the whole "Paul is Dead" thing was just a big global prank played on the world by the Beatles, who loved pulling pranks.

This probably would have been hilarious to them.

Who gets kicks from pretending to be dead?

A band of stoners with a massive following.

Literally cant think of any examples where thats happened before

If you're interested in the Paul is Dead conspiracy theory read The Walrus Was Paul. https://www.amazon.com/Walrus-Was-Paul-Great-Beatle/dp/0684850621

It's a great book regardless and gives insight on how the band viewed the theory.

People who are more famous than Jesus.

Im not sure you could get more famous than Jesus tbh

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/More_popular_than_Jesus

No he said Paul McCarthy. That is the guy holding up Season 3 of Rick and Morty.

Honestly it's just hearsay for me but I'd say there's ample evidence. It's not really an area of interest for me though so I haven't given it a thorough investigation.

Marilyn monroe was enema'd to death. With such a large amount of drugs that she would of physically passed out before the lethal amount.

Someone sat there and had an enema up her ass for about 45 minutes pumping in those benzo's. Enema parties were big around that time with the social "elite".

wait, what.

Yea I read about it from her care handler/ father figure let me find the source in question, check back for the edit.

Except several of those are documented truth. MK ultra, the Gulf of Tonkin, and operation paperclip can't be denied even by the staunchest skeptics.

Here from /r/all, what's the conspiracy part of op paperclip? It's taught by the military in an unclass setting, is anyone denying it?

People dismiss it as a conspiracy theory. It's is not.

Like... the whole thing? How the hell else did we magically get all those german scientists?

I don't know. People dismiss any kind of actions that the US takes. Some of them likely think that they were all just defectors before and during the war rather than after the war. It's similar to those who deny operation Mockingbird as if the US wouldn't have its own arm of propaganda creation.

Who's Paul McCarthy?

He's the guy holding up Season 3 of Rick and Morty. Didn't you get the Wikileak?

A pinko

How is Cointelpro not on your list?

remains to be seen..

Guy is actively lying about what hes doing to Hawaii right now and people believe him 100% because of a statement he made on Facebook. His entire history and success is based on lying to people and stealing from his contractor/business partner.

I hate to say it but Zuckerberg is right. People trust him for no reason at all.

People trust him because he's filthy rich.

He wasn't always, yet they still trusted him even then.

sounds like a typical polititian to me

Down with the bitches and hoes? Imma vote for him.

So you're saying he's basically a standard democrat?

People said the same thing when Trump was rumored to be running. America is turning into a true oligarchy where the rich run things.

And Trump running and actually winning gives legitimacy to these other rich fucks who think their business/music careers can be substituted for 0 public service experience. Like, for fucks sake, at least run for mayor or governor or something first. Have a record reflecting you actually care about the people, and that you're not running just to satisfy some selfish ambition for power.

well he won't if his time in the office is a complete disaster, which let's all be real that is a possibility.

I fully agree with having experience, but doesn't it show that our system is amazing when people with no experience to those with decades in governmental positions all have an equal ability to run for the highest office in the country?

The idea that being rich and having money is all that matters in campaign is bullshit. Trump might be rich but his opposition literally had twice as much in campaign donations.

Good let them waste their money.

Exactly what I thought when I read this title. If he manages to get a major party nomination, there is no chance he'll lose.

GOP is scared of him. That's why this smear campaign has already begun in earnest.

Wtf do you mean turning into it's always been this way you just have the internet to communicate better with others and pass around information.

Hasn't it been that way?

Its turning into that? Did you forget who he was running against? Do you realize how much money Hillary and the Clinton "foundation" had? Granted that dried up as soon as she lost but she's looking out for the other elites.

Oligarchic plutocracy FTFY

"Turning into" thanks for the laugh Bernie.

Not just an oligarchy of course, also and maybe more importantly a plutocracy.

He literally knows everything about everyone ,he will have a algorithm made to say the right things everytime his cock trap opens

This is Avengers Helicarriers stuff.

Where's Captain America when ya need him?

http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/galleries/x701/103872.jpg

Zuckerberg has zero charisma. He might have money, but he's got all the charm and style of a piece of broccoli.

Political career is DOA before it's even started.

Jeb disagrees

Jeb!

JEB!

Clap please

Please Upvote.

https://youtu.be/UFkjq4wmYwI

ಠ_ಠ

wha tha fuk?

Yeah, is this real? Why the fuck are the media not shitting all over themselves about this?

It wasn't Jeb, just some guy that looked a bit like him

Damn. I almost clapped.

She bites him and that guy wants him to stop punching her.

Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey

She's biting me. She's biting me.

I know...

Enigma!

slow clap

You forgot this: !

So did Jeb.....

Jeb is a mess!

His name is Jeb!, right?

Jeb! disagrees.

Why does Jeb disagree?

the media has a way of swaying people to vote for someone (except for hillary)

Speaking on behalf of progressives, there's no way the Berners will support him. In fact, they'll probably shout him down.

Although you're right, the media could prop him up as a viable canididate.

The media went full speed ahead with Hillary and she is very charismatic. If they cant make her win, they certainly can't help the big Z U C C.

Hillary is charismatic? Maybe to a bunch of 1%ers, everything she has said, I've cringed at.

A lot of people cringed. But I can assure you, millions of people were swayed by her speeches.

Then the media overdid it or did it too blatantly to the point of insulting people's intelligence

I'm pretty sure this is what happened/continues to happen. "But but WE told you it was illegal to look at wikileaks! Why won't anyone listen to us!?!?" said CNN.

I have not met a single person who was swayed by her speeches out of all her supporters that I know.

That doesn't mean they aren't out there. Even if we subtract voter fraud and "never trump" people, she got a lot of votes. I'm not saying everyone was swayed. I'm saying a lot of people were.

If you are talking absolute number, yeah then I agree, a lot were swayed, hundreds of thousands maybe a million.

If you mean percentage I think it is a very small number, perhaps less than 10 percent of the population, but I doubt it is that high.

Totally based on my personal experiences and views as this is not a stat anyone can find anywhere or claim with any accuracy.

Just because they didn't deliver her the presidency that doesn't mean they have zero influence.

Yeah. Im not saying zero influence. Im saying it would have been easier with Hillary and they still messed up.

there was a lot of anti-Hillary media though

I hope your being sarcastic, the media could not remove itself from Hillarys dick

swaying people to vote for someone (except for hillary)

ha, that wasn't without really trying, however.... oh my fuck, did they ever try. They tried too hard, really.

Media tried so hard it was off-putting.

not without trying...

The media has enormous influential powers. It just can't be overstated how strongly people preferred Bernie, or didn't like her.

He needs to grab some pussies first!

Wrong, he has more money than god and hired David Plouffe, a cold blooded killer in campaigns. It is not DOA, especially when you recognize the potential over the next few years for a catastrophic blow to the GOP brand in the short term.

So exactly like Hillary... The woman was a goddamn robot.

Robots can't go limp and get thrown in a van like a bag of dog food.

She ran out of batteries.

"Zuckerberg has zero charisma. He might have money..."

Trump did it....

Zuckerberg has zero charisma.

Two words: Trump Won.

but he's got all the charm and style of a piece of broccoli.

As a dark green broccoli I find this comment highly offensive. Check your dressing you wilter!

Right. Generally speaking, the funniest candidate wins. I actually haven't heard Zuckerberg speak, but he doesn't look like he's funny. Hillary Clinton almost won despite being not at all funny. Trump doesn't appear to have a sense of humor whatsoever but he has said a ton of amusing things. Could you imagine Trump having a big, genuine laugh at a funny joke?

Sounds familiar.

Everyone said the same about Trump before, and now guess where he's at?

I hate saying this because it's going to sound like I'm a huge Trump fan, which I'm not. But...

Trump has always had his personality. People either love him or hate him... there just isn't much of an in between.

For me, if there's one word that describes Mark Zuckerberg, it's meh. He's where he belongs right now, milking Facebook data for everything it's worth.

Oh yeah no denying he's always been this way, but he used to not be so....mental? I mean I've seen interviews from 10-20 years ago, and while he still seems like an asshole, at least he was a level-headed asshole.

Yup I agree, but a lot of people like his "everything = big/American" attitude, whether you like him or not, he is kind of the embodiment of someone who made it in the classic American dream. The last thing appeals to a lot of people.

Then again, this is how I see it as a non-American, so I could be wrong.

No you're right, a lot of people like him because of his patriotism and seeming to be very rich.

But he's more like what a poor person imagines a rich person to be, instead of a real rich person.

He's a caricature of himself, and doesn't realize how ridiculous he looks/sounds

He's still pretty young. But in his line of business, my guess would be some serious, cutting edge nootropics.

Tech guys and overachievers like to use various means to enhance their mental and cognitive functioning. Zuckerberg seems like the archetype for both.

So I could see him going a little overboard on nootropics.

Hey hey hey, no need to insult broccoli like that.

bob dole jeb bush mitt romney al gore...charisma giants

That's what they said about Trump....

I'd rather have Mark than Trump. Just saying.

Are you saying there'd be a real difference between Zuckerberg and Trump?

I feel like they're all just window dressing now.

He has the information to say exactly what we want.

We have told him specifically how to polish each individual turd, over the last decade, and how much he can drive up the cost on that turd before he sells it too us.

It will be interesting to see how the most successful market tested campaign for presidency will affect us.

Zuckerberg has zero charisma. He might have money, but he's got all the charm and style of a piece of broccoli.

He has the communication channel to make as many people vote for him that he wants.

See: The Secret Agenda of a Facebook Quiz for some scary insights into his power.

Man, that's the kind of chances they have Trump and now look where were at. Come 2020, anything is possible.

Haha broccoli.

But, dude, he got hoodies - Millennials love hoodies.

One can hope

Well considering the song "Broccoli" is a top hit of 2016 I'm a little worried.

This all sounds too familiar

Jesus fuck...

Don't let that shit stop you from shitting on his presidential campaign.

Trump did it. Hell if another one gets through.

Our current president can't even form a coherent sentence in the English language.

While your probably correct that's what everyone said about trump. These days nothing is for certain anymore

Hahahaha a piece of broccoli. This, sadly for him, couldn't be more true. Thank you for the laugh lol

Dress and tone/charisma (aka everything a politician is) can be predetermined these days via the TelePrompTer and hairdresser/stylist.

Didn't Bush get elected twice?

This "rich prick runs directly for president" meme isn't that new [Perot], Trump was just fortunate enough to run against Hillary, and still just barely won.

Why? We let a bigot assume the highest office in the land so Zuck is no problem!

If he runs, we need Trump to stay in

After trumps reputation and tenure, people could very well treat Zuckerbergs campaign to be like the coming of the messiah :P

That's what we said about Donald Trump...

I don't know if he has improved much but I remember as facebook was gaining traction he talked to a university class and his public speaking skills were terrible.

I'm afraid that every presidential election from now on will be loaded with celebrities and shitty business people.

Lol like with TV sensation Donald Trump?

He's probably going to go for governor of Hawaii, or congresperson. That way he can steal all the land legally

Trump is going to win the next election too, unless they assassinate him.

Unlikely,he will use Facebook telemetry to maximize his campaign and free polling.

Facebook spyware is very powerful in the right hands.

I'm sure people said the same of Trump..

I hope as internet users we see that Facebo ("The social placebo!") is malicious, privacy invading software that provides zero intrinsic benefit to anyone except governments and corporations by 2020.

He will spaghetti so fast in front of the spotlight your head will spin. He cannot handle social situations, at fucking all.

He is almost dirty enough to run. After he screws the people in the Hawaii land grab he will do just fine. asshole.

You're wrong though, he doesn't want to screw those people. You probably didn't read the article last time it was posted, right ?

Great fucking job reading the article. He fucked over so many people by giving them money for land they didn't know they owned. Ohh no the inhumanity. Even hiring all the lawyers to track down every single person who owns even a fucking acorn on the property.

Are there oak trees in Hawaii? If not somebody would know they placed an acorn there.

I doubt we'll ever see President Fuckerberg

Agreed. This little pecker wouldn't be able to stand on a debate stage with Trump. This is a bullshit conspiracy theory.

Yeah, but it would be amazing to watch.

It's like a trainwreck and you can't look away.

Mark is a mess

Mark is a big, fat mistake.

Are you kidding me? We saw him debate against one of the most uncharismatic, disliked, and out of touch politicians of all time, doubled up with the fact that there were over 30 years of bad history to use against her.

Anyone with a spark of remote sense would've ripped Trump apart on a debate platform. He goes for playground bully tactics, and mostly serves to embarrass himself. If he stood against someone who has as much as an iota of charisma, and the gall to avoid the stage presence of respectability, he'd collapse.

Trump is definitely the single, standalone "yes, literally anyone can be president" candidate. I'd be surprised if 2020 isn't followed up on with even more unqualified candidates, simply to prey on the fact that people are stupid enough to vote them in based on a TV personality.

That's what they said about trump too

Anyone who said that never saw trump debate or was in pure denial. I think trump is a moron, but I respect his charisma and his ability to shut down less aggressive people during a debate with simple bullying tactics. Zuckerberg would crumble.

Idk man. I think most people now base their votes according to popularity instead of capability. Here in my country, we have a sociopath President, a boxer turned Senator who preaches about the Bible yet proposes to bring back Death Penalty, and last but not the least, we have many celebrities that turned into politicians.

I stopped being surprised a long time ago

This man is a chinese clone after the chinese tyrannical's party and their lover boy Jeff Zucker.. CEO OF CNN. The central news network for China. He won't win. Watch interviews with Mark Zuckcuck hes not normal

If TPTB want him to win, he'll win.

haha wow way to roll over for your masters lol. no they wont

I think the issue is going to be the new tech that allows for an entire interview to be doctored. In 4 years it will more than likely be flawless. Regardless of how autistic someone is, they will be able to make them flawless orators on camera.

Don't think for a second the Chinese don't clone people they fucking do. It's funny look at his name now go look at his wife

Can we get the source of the quote?

Don't confuse the issue by asking for facts

Only alternative fact™ allowed!

There is none. It's the usual bullshit.

Zuckerberg would run as a Democrat, so everything he does it bad. Trump ran as a Republican so the standards for evidence of wrong doing are impossible to fulfill.

Source: half the stupid fucks on this subreddit.

It was an anonymous leak so it's up to you wether you want to believe it or not. Here's an article on the subject.

anonymous leak

ffs

Okay then. Well I will submit my anonymous leak that Barack Obama once said "By the year 2019 every home in America will be filled to the brim with Cheetos and daffodils."

Have at it r/conspiracy

Dafodils looks really funny written out haha

It's funny how anonymous leaks aren't 'verifiable' or worth anyone's time until it conforms to their already existing beliefs.

Definitely need some better source. It's sad to see this top the page without even a link in the OP.

So it was floated to see how universally hated he is.

anonymous leaks are stealth polls to test the waters. He wants to but his PR team is at work seeing if it's worth the effort.

I second the source request. Anonymous leaks don't count as sources unless they are from reliable/verifiable publishers.

The CIA and Russia thing is all from anonymous sources. CNN hosts quote anonymous insiders 24/7. At this point anonymously sourced information implies a talking point/message/propaganda. It usually means someone has an agenda.

It warrants skepticism and further investigation at least.

Honestly this whole thread reeks of "agenda".

This is /r/conspiracy. Do you really think people here care about sources or evidence?

Seriously, I see so many quotes in r/conspiracy with no source. It should be easy to link to a source for quotes, it's not like asking for the missing Majestic 12 papers.

He's a notoriously bad public speaker who despite totally not being autistic, dresses like he's twelve. It's not like he's spent decades on TV or in public life. Don't see it happen, but yes, millions of morons would vote for him.

Or he's figured out mind control. That would explain a lot of the insanity on Facebook.

Possibility

But he supposedly recites The Odyssey verbatim. What an absolute joke.

Textbook autism.

If he actually can do it verbatim, the entire unabridged version, then he gets my vote.

Why? That's a substantial part of his brain dedicated to useless info. If he remembered massive amounts historical events, how they transpired, how people ignored them, how it affected events going forward, he's possibly have my vote, but memorizing a useless book, nah, just shows he doesn't know how to manage his time well.

I just want him to spend hours reciting the book.

If it'll keep him from running, I'm with you.

And who knows? Maybe the dirty laundry aired by the opposition will cause the downfall of Facebook.

I would love that - I just that think it's too entrenched and too many people wouldn't care or understand even if dirty laundry were aired...though I guess all you'd need is the stock price to start to stumble and go from there.

it is all media created fiction.

I know, which is why I want him to do it.

Decades? Facebook has barely been a thing for one decade.

he can hire people to train/get wardrobe, those are small problems imo. he can come out as "zuckerberg 2.0" and pretend to not be a robot. the guy's not stupid unfortunately

Haha Kanye vs Zuckerberg 2020

The new celebrity death match lol. I'd actually pick Kanye too. Fuck, idk what that says about me.

At least Kanye would put on a good inaugural ball, did you see this one? They had 5 men all playing a piano like the blue man group and every one of them had a fucking grin on their face like they were coming up on mushrooms.

I did not. Sounds interesting. Mark would use the US to help his short ass take over the world. Kanye would just occasionally hold odd and incoherent speeches about jay z sending hitters at his head and talk about Kim's ass. Less productive but less harmful.

Kanye's smarter than you think. I've never listened to his music, but every now and the he breaks programming and starts speaking truth.

I know all about his truths. I said I'd pick him over mark.

I laughed, have my uptrump

That's almost worse than Trump v Clinton.

At this point I would vote for Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho

Kanye said he's waiting till 2024.

Maybe he was just being respectful towards Trump. Trump pulled the "your not American enough" thing on Kanye though so if I was him I wouldn't care anymore though.

From what I know, they're both pals and Kayne wants Trump to have a 2nd term

Some of his plastics still say Kayne too.

That isn't possible

I might prefer Kony VS Zuckerburg 2020

i.. i choose ww3.

Is he old enough?

He will be in 2020. Must be 35. He's 32 now.

This is cointel pro. This is mark zuckerberg.

To know if Zuckerberg has a chance to win, research if he is descended from King John of England.

Wow, incredible to think the Angevin bloodline is still going strong. I wonder if this is because the bloodline has stretched so far out to the masses, or if it shows that ruling is still restricted to the chosen few.

Nah. I'm a descendant of the Cherokee Chief/Ambassador to England Chief Oconostota. He literally went to England, got banned for hugging the king instead of bowing and stole the Kings bitch before coming up. So he knocked up the former lady in waiting and my family tree was started. It's YUGE. Most people are related TBH. Ever seen how many black people are related to Thomas Jefferson? Lmao shiiiet

Ever seen how many black people are related to Thomas Jefferson?

Because the DNA came from his brother?

Pretty much anyone with Anglo-Saxon ancestry is related to King John of England. It's called pedigree collapse and it's a thing.

I'm related to King John of England. I'm closely related to five former presidents, and obviously related to most of the rest. But in those terms, I'm also related to about 100,000,000 European people.

So that doesn't say much.

Oh, and nobody is knocking on my door asking me to run for President. Yet.

Came here for this....Does anyone know if he has royal blood?

I "like" this.

/s

We still gotta get through the next couple of years, man.

One shit-storm at a time, please.

I doubt he would be elected by the party though. Surely after Trump they will go for someone more in the political establishment?

He won't win Hawaii....

I have always believed he is CIA. The rise of his company always sounded a little too good to be true to me. Then, when the Facebook movie came out it came off to me as predictive programming designed to create a mythos around him.

Relevant?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xk3I-a3CJdo

Damn. I forgot that the Onion used to be good.

Ditto

Golden rule about American propaganda, if they make a movie about an event, its to enforce the lie behind it.

Any other examples?

Just about all Marky Mark's movies over the last decade

I dunno, lone survivor was pretty good and pretty accurate to the extent that they movie matched up well with luttrells book. But agree about the others.

Yeah but that's part if the "be a patriot and love our troops and snipers are heros, here's his official life story and the rubber stamped version of his suspicious death."

Shooter was good to a point. Showing govt people happy to false flag and even creating a suicided device

but hes not political

Shooter was reasonably anti-establishment. I mean it's about an ex-sniper going on a just, cleaning-house killing spree with a turned fbi agent.

Ted?

Anything by oliver stone except the doors (which was actually very good but mostly bcuz pf val kilmer)

Was total bullshit tho.

Probably, but Sometimes there comes along a movie role and an actor combo that are linked by fate or Destiny or some supernatural shit. I've only seen it a few times.. Val kilmer singing as Jim Morrison. Juaquin phoenix as Johnny cash. And.George c.scott as general George patton himself.

Christopher Reeves as Superman.

Nice addition!! Guess bale as batman too since we're talking super heroes.

Robin Williams as everything.

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

I worked on the film I Saw The Light, it was an absolute garbage film but, Tom Hiddleston's preform since was incredible. Sounded just like Hank Williams Sr

Snowden, American Sniper.

I dont know, Snowden seemed like it was more pro-Snowden and not so much American propaganda.. I mean Snowden himself was in the end of it.

Which plays out like a fairy tale compared to the stories of other whistle blowers. What if Snowden is CIA trying to do good PR/Branding for US Intelligence?

By exposing one of the biggest controvercies ever? I mean before Snowden the NSA straight denied peaking at citizens, how is Snowden releasing that info good pr for the CIA? I mean that dude sacrafised his life for us to know that. He cant ever come home or it will not be a happy ending for him. In no way do i see any of this a "fairytale" type story.

Here is a post that goes into more detail by /u/ikilledtupac , copy pasted below

"I hit most of it in this post reply, so, I'll just paste it and maybe emphasize a few things

Man you can't just say Snowden is CIA.

how'd his girlfriend get to Russia? She just get her passport, get a visa no problem, buy some tickets on Expedia and take a taxi to the airport? The girlfriend/collaborator of the supposedly most wanted man in American history...just gets to leave the country...to go live with him? And we didn't know? We didn't/couldn't follow her? Didn't suspend her passport? Russian consulate just gave her a visa like its all good? TSA/NSA/CIA was just like oh sure she can leave the country thats fine? And she couldn't be followed to Snowden? is she a super spy to? Come on now.

CIA and the media have been looking for a war with Russia.

no way, and, for what purpose? We do political takeovers anyways. Like Syria. Or the Ukraine. Did you know Joe Biden's son is an executive in the new, for-profit, recently privatized Ukraine Oil and Gas? He is.

Deep state is pushing for it hard. All those Russian hacked shit. All that electrical grid problems.

that was all fake news

The proxy war in Syria.

why wage a proxy war if they want a real one? That's all about Iran anyways.

Why would Russia keep a CIA spy in their country.

why wouldn't they? know what he knows, see what he does, where he goes, who he talks to.

Do you have something more?

wasted years of counter terrorism classes in college perhaps

just think about it. leaked "intel" that doesn't name names. no politicians. no actionable information. Not to mention, it made the US looking like an unstoppable global badass! We are fucking everywhere, all the time! It looked GOOD.Glossy powerpoints with small words and grainy pictures ready for publication. all that happened was the programs became legal, they came out of the shadows on their terms and now it is all there and all legal and protected. A book deal. A movie deal. Snowden is now part of security circles that would have been impossible for the NSA/CIA to penetrate before. People with new leaks will come to Snowden first. How did his girlfriend get to Russia? She just get on a plane and fly there? Why is she a pole dancer? Why was she at the Oscars? Why doesn't anyone remember Snowden? Why didn't any of the journalists get to see him, instead they got held on that plane?

...and why on earth couldn't we get him in Russia, if we wanted to. You don't escape US intel. Period. but right, the whole "concerned" citizen PATRIOT CITIZEN FOUR BLOCKBUSTER MOVIE guy makes more sense? Please. You know that it is illegal to produce a movie about or with the US military or intel agencies without specific US government approval, right? here's another pro tip for consideration: why does what he leaked look different than all other known leaks? Leaks don't look like the shit he posted.

What was up with ridiculous raid of the Guardian? Where the crazy government guys smashed old hard drives on camera? WTF was that all about? Oh, and you're telling me that the government got all their proof because Greenwald, the elusive, super reporter...wrote the passwords to his encrypted USB stick that he gave his boyfriend...on a piece of paper...and the boyfriend got caught at the airport with it and that blew the case wide open? You're telling me Glen Greenwald just had a full on stroke and decided to do the most predictable amateur mistake in spy history...and we are supposed to believe that? And why, if all this was real, isn't his ass in prison? We put shmucks in Guantanamo for 15 years for less shit than Greewald did. Why is he special?

Where is Snowden's team of lawyers? Assange and Manning are surrounded by lawyers, police, military, intel, all the time. They live in constant fear. Why doesn't Snowden? Don't say Russia. We can get anyone anywhere. Every other leaker is either in prison, dead, or we are trying to kill them, or frame them. And they're what? A disgraced CIA agent, a transexual Army guy, and a weird looking Swedish dude. And Snowden is...a mid 30's white guy that is wholly unremarkable in every way, whom nobody remembers going to school with or working with, hell even his employer didn't lose a dime over all this? Why is Snowden special?

Oh, and, knowing that leaks are inevitable, wouldn't it be better to cause, control, and leak what you want, on your own terms? Own it before it can happen by something else? Or, get the trust of other potential leakers that they will come to you? The brave patriot living a life of luxury with his gf in Russia? After Snowden, everyone was supposed to use Tor! Tor is funded by the government.

Sometimes things happen for us to see, even if we are told they are things we were not supposed to see. Intelligence agencies put out things for us to find.

Like the Stasi said, what's the use of a huge surveillance program, if nobody knows you have it?

Or, what if, you can just make everyone believe you have it-isn't that just as good? What's the difference between an global intel system so amazing that nobody can prove you have it, and no system at all? And these are the same people that couldn't crack a 5 year old iPhone the San Bernardino shooter had? Really? So far, we know this supposed incredible system has failed to catch...any...terrorists. Not one. Hasn't stopped shit. Is there any evidence it exists on the level they say it does? Besides what they released? There is not. But now anyone wanting to talk bad about us, who had been previously using gmail, yahoo, skype, etc, are now flocking to Tor and using PGP keys like we can't crack those. What's easier to track? A fuckton of ways to communicate, or just a couple that people use now, thinking everything else has been compromised?

Real intel is a bunch of black and white shit with acronyms the public doesn't understand. It's gobbedly gook. Boring. But it names names, its emberrasing. It's actionable. It's Chelsea Mannings stuff.

Snowden despised the government so much that he exposed it, risked his life, his family, his career, but at the same time, respected its privacy and didn't post anything illegal or embarrassing? Right, cuz that makes sense. Most of what he leaked just made our spies look like fucking badasses that have infiltrated everyone! It was awesome! Did you read the book? It's thrilling! And all bullshit!

Real leakers live on embassy couches for years, or try to kill themselves over and over again as they rot in prison, or, they get shot in the back at 2am in a Washington DC alleyway. They do not get book deals, blockbuster movies, and live an unmolested life in a nice country with their hot girlfriend.

So what makes more sense to you? The above incredible string of coincidences and convenient things, plausible but extremely unlikely? Or-that Snowden is a psyop? To me, that is much more believable, and-there is no evidence to prove that he isn't. Speaking of, why isn't that ever discussed? The media just takes him 100% on his word? That is suspicious-especially considering that we now know the media is entirely compromised by the government. Hm.

I really hope this thread doesn't get buried :/

edit: and, for what its worth, I think Manning belongs in prison. Assange probably does too. What he/she did was wrong, and despite my theories of who/what I think Snowden is, I don't support anyone who does anything that could get our people killed...and since Snowden is an inside man, there's a reason why they aren't going after him like they are the others"

Thank you for citing!

American Sniper Barry

Zero Dark Thirty

argo.

i was watching The Arrival the other day, the one from the nineties...

That's a pretty crappy rule considering there's a movie about literally everything.

So Simba wasn't the rightful heir to the throne?

Nope. Scar was the one true king.

Yes.

There is not a movie about the moon landings.

You're fucking joking right?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_(film)

Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_(film)

^{HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 22124}

What about the Snowden movie

Bingo !!!

Most actors and powerful people are these days.

This guy is Hillary levels of unlikeable, maybe even lower. I suspect he has a "Jared from subway" level skeleton in his closet too. Maybe all the Pizzagate talk piqued his interest in politics. At any rate, Trump will crush him.

the hammerhead eyes don't help

He looks like the son of the Elephant Man from Mask.

This guy is Hillary levels of unlikeable

That is a very bold statement.

Agreed. The only other human with Hillary levels of unlikeable would be Bill Cosby.

Hillary levels? So you're saying he'll beat Trump in the popular vote by millions of people too?

Take out LA County and Trump wins it.

So you're saying that if you ignore enough votes Trump won the popular vote too? No shit, but how is manipulating the data an argument?

He doesn't have experience with debate, or the public. He'll wash out in the primaries. He thinks he can do it because Trump did it, but hes not Trump.

He thinks he can do it because Trump did it, but hes not Trump.

I feel that this will become the tagline for so many politicians all over the world in the next couple of years.

It's literally already happening with Kevin O'Leary in Canada

Yeah, but that doesn't mean he'll win.

He made maybe 11 million off that 4 billion Mattel deal he talks about.

Isn't Trudeau extremely popular in Canada?

His popularity has gone down. He's still a liberal shill that's fucking up the country (imo) and Canada, while more liberal than the US, is starting to follow America's timeline of shutting down globalism and identity politics. Kevin is kind of like Trump but is a bit more polished with speaking and general political stuff.

Kevin is an absolute psychopath. He'll never be Prime Minister.

You underestimate peoples stupidity. We elected Harper.... twice. The second time was right after he was found guilty of contempt of parliament.

I shudder to think about it but, I think O'Leary has a very real chance.

We elected Harper three times. Careful who you call stupid there genius.

I agree. The media gives him like 10x the air time of the other conservative leadership candidates combined. It is disgusting.

He's so antiunion though, I just can't see it happening. I wouldn't be surprised though.

But Trump.

Trump and Kevin aren't even on the same planet. Trump isn't fantastic, but Kevin is pure evil.

Ok well I think you're selling Trump a little short on the evil front. But I guess we'll find out, won't we?

I guess so. I think you're selling Kevin a little shore on the decent front. I'm not saying Trump isn't evil, but Kevin is a special kind of evil.

I mean, Kevin comes off as the "merciless tax cuts that are felt for decades and we find out he embezzled hundreds of millions ten years after his last term", but I honestly think Trump, if left to his own devices, would make himself Emperor of America and create a modern monarchy with his shitty family holding the reigns.

Trump is a master troll. O'Leary just strikes me as a greasy banker. No experience in the limelight.

I mean, he's been on TV for a while himself, so I wouldn't say he's unfamiliar with the limelight. Not to imply he isn't a greasy banker...

It's think a bit of a different landscape without the organized white supremacist movement to bolster him as Trump had. Canada is generally not as openly racist as the country where people still fly the flag of traitorous slave owners with pride.

Jesus Christ lol do you actually believe that the white supremacist are what got Trump elected?

Seems that there's a very loud section of the country very excited that open racism and xenophobia is acceptable again. Wonder who they support?

It's not acceptable, lmao. Curious about your proof though.

Show us the evidence that the sector has any population at all and show us how they are "very loud" because I don't see shit from them.

I doubt we get a unabashed populist on the right like the Americans did and many here denounce trump as an idiot and most wouldn't want us to have our own trump.

How's he fucking up his country?

His hair is certainly popular.

lol no.

Canadians hate him.

They figured him getting elected would mean his father's policies.

Trudeau is hot and nothing else.

Outside of the big cities I don't think so. Much like H in California.

It doesn't, but it's definitely something to keep an eye on because nobody thought Trump would win, either.

Trump didn't win because of his financial acumen.

I never implied he did. I meant that plugging your (not you specifically, people in general) ears and saying "he'll never win" like a lot of Canadians are now is the same thing that happened with Trump.

Yeah but that was different. People said Trump would never win as liberal projection.

They say Zuckerberg will never win because he really won't. He is literally the public embodiment of the CIA.

Anyone who endorses him will be at the butt of jokes like "What skeletons do you have in your closet?"

His presence will be toxic.

Plenty of people on both sides thought Trump would never win for a good while, just look at the Vegas odds at the start of his campaign. It wasn't "liberal projection" until right at the very end.

O'Leary is a ex-reality tv star with a somewhat debated background as a successful businessman/entrepreneur, and he was obviously inspired for his run by Trump's success; there's far more reason for comparison of Trump with O'Leary than with Zuckerberg.

Yeah but Kevin like Don is a conservative international investor who have built some impressive private businesses. Zuckerberg is a shill to the system running that company off government subsidies (which hopefully end soon) and public investors. I just hope the snowflakes don't say "Zuckerberg is a business man that wants to be nice to muslims, I'm for him!"

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

I want to watch him get demolished in a debate. Smug fuck thinks hes smarter than everyone. He made a social media site, he didnt invent the fucking idea.

Yeah, the guy doesn't really have anything to offer politically. He was a Hillary supporter going back to the primaries. All the energy and ideas and intelligence on the left are with Bernie's wing.

These celebrities are so used to everyone telling them how amazing they are they don't realize they have a very poor grasp of modern politics and the mood of the country.

And if its one thing they should have learned by now, its that it doesnt help with Hollywood, media and social media in your back, if the other candidate is accurately saying what is wrong with the country, and has generic, real support. I could see a Zuckerberg run for president fail immensly. If anything it would educate people to the dangers of manipulation/astroturfing in elections, as was seen with Hillary.. Imagine how Facebook will be for the 18 months while he is campaigning. Hopefully, within that time, Trump will have done so much good that there wont be a point running against him.

Totally agree. These guys are delusional if they think you can just win the presidency by being a rich billionaire. They're learning all the wrong lessons about what made Trump popular, and completely ignoring all his policy positions. Zuckerberg would just embarrass himself.

It's amazing how little of your post I'd need to change in order for it to apply to the current POTUS.

Clearly Trump has a good understanding of the mood of the country and modern politics, or else he couldn't have been elected against all odds with no prior political experience. Say what you will, but his strategy worked.

Also, he does offer something politically that is different than what any other candidate was. You may not like it, but nobody else was arguing against immigration and free trade and endless wars and in favor of nationalist economic policies. He carved out a pretty unique intellectual position within his own party. People like Zuckerberg and most other celebrities, by contrast, hold mostly the exact same positions as Hillary, who in turn held mostly the exact same positions as Obama.

He could be, and likely is, nothing but a madman in a country going mad. Winning proves nothing, especially considering he lost the popular vote. It's a popularity contest, and he didn't even win, he just didn't lose by a wide enough margin to actually lose the presidency. Wow, talk about finger on the pulse.

And please, don't tell me about the end of "endless war" when this son of a bitch is openly suggesting a literal war for oil.

Madman tend to be the most intelligent AND dangerous people on this planet, since you can never really know what they're up to. They could go completely unhinged and still get things done simply because of how their thinking works. They dont "think" like the normies. They think with no true boundaries and limits. Most people getting the "mad man" look is because of this type of thing.

Think less "Hannibal Lector" and more "man exposes self on subway platform".

In relation to this article, I'm trying to make a point that most celebrities don't actually offer anything new by way of politics, and are therefore not comparable to Trump. Trump might not follow through on his campaign promises, but he ran a hell of a campaign, and that shouldn't be in dispute. I'm just skeptical that Mark Zuckerberg (or Alec Baldwin or whoever else) is capable of running such a successful campaign, because they basically stand for the same stale policies of Hillary and Obama.

I'm not trying to get you to agree with Trump. I'm just pointing out that he had a unique political position that clearly resonated with enough people to become president. The fact that you and many others are so opposed to it shows how unique it is. He's not offering the same old Republican rhetoric. I don't care if you like it or not, but it worked. He beat 16 other primary contenders because he was offering something different, and people liked it. Zuckerberg is not offering anything new, except for his personality, which isn't very appealing. If you think Zuckerberg's political vision is interesting or fresh, what specifically?

I never said I support or even don't hate Zuckerberg, but I don't think Trump offered anymore more than the same old hate and a name people recognize. He did away with the dog whistle terms and just went for it, but "a hell of a campaign"? Gimme a fucking break. He name-called and shit-posted his way to the fucking white house, and you're talking like he's Machiavelli 2.0, instead of the lucky imbecile that he clearly is.

He's shit at public speaking and it shows. Hitlery is too, but she's well known so people just ignored it.

Now all the richy people want president

Ignorant ass people think Trump just won because he's rich and "people are stupid" smh...

He's a great demagogue, and cattered to the biggest crowd.

A pretty much standard tactic.

He has near weekly in person question and answer sessions with employees on the FB campus.

He's getting defacto practice very regularly.

Those are things you can learn.

True, but he really going to put in thousands of hours?

Zuckerberg 2020 is Donald's only chance of winning again.

He is making no case for himself selling out FB users. He has lost my respect.

Zuckerberg doesn't have much to offer the world.

Except a platform for free communication and connection for everyone, which nearly two billion people utilize.

Yeah not much at all.

If it wasn't Facebook it would've stayed MySpace.

"If it wasn't for Google it would have stayed Altavista."

Do you see how silly that sounds?

Oh and I forgot about the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative... Curing all diseases isn't offering the world much either.

You're trying to expand the conversation beyond its original content. Stay focus on your original comment.

You were stating that Facebook is a highly used social network, I stated that if it wasn't Facebook it would've stayed MySpace. MySpace was improving but Facebook got there first and won the popular vote.

I'm not implying anything, this isn't 11th grade English so there's no need to analyze every word. I could turn around and say that you're implying Facebook is the only good thing Zuckerberg ever did even though according to you he's curing diseases. It doesn't matter if you forgot that part it just shows that social media is more important to you than curing diseases. You see how silly that sounds when you assume implications.

I appreciate you doing your research but this isn't going to be an argument nor a debate just a passing comment.

The first sentence of your comment is so disheartening...

Then I remember I'm in /r/conspiracy, what should I expect?

Expansion on a conversation is fine just don't try to change subject from A to B when you're discussing A. That's like saying that all Ford trucks are Crap and then directing the discussion from Ford trucks to Mustangs.

Oh yea this sub does exist Hello from r/all

Fuck the Zuck, he sucks!

Has there ever been a jew pres?

Intelligence gathering operation. Overnight every other site says you need to use them to comment.

Mark Zuckerberg as president? That would be quite embarrassing for the US.

Perfect for the leftists, a whiz kid who stole a roommate's invention and has a slope wife.

What is a slope wife?

asian

I figured it was an ignorant connotation

Jesus leave your bigoted assholery in the 70s, where it never belonged in the first place. There are people who look different than you. Get the fuck over it.

Rule 1, first warning.

Did you forget who the current president is?

A rich patriot?

Back to back embarrassments

I'd take Zuckerberg over Trump any day. It's not even close.

Will facebook even be around in 2020, or will it end up like MySpace.

Itll go full AOL soon. Within 4 years seems reasonable.

Facebook owns instagram, whatsapp, and oculus too. Also in the era of myspace nobody had yet figured out how to reliably convert user data into cash. Facebook and google solved that problem. These web companies won't be going out of business like they used to.

its getting rather odd that so many other apps and sites require facebbok accounts. CIA's attempt at universal id

I love how naive this comment is, no offence.

NSA has universal id's and probably other surveilence agencies all around the world , every data-collection company has universal ID's and companies can literaly buy people's data.

You have hardware backdoors in almost all of your computing devices (Intel management engine for instance, and amd's incorporation of it), you have software backdoors everywhere, your modem probably has a backdoor and soon enough your refrigerators will do so.

If we forget for a second about the big guys, what about smaller guys? Every computing device can be exploited in a way or another even by script kiddies.

Whatever you do, your privacy is almost completely gone.

They also bought Google's project loon RIP

converting user data into cash

Yeah they do that but a ton of it was government subsidies and shit like that. Which hopefully now will ease up.

from what i hear oculus is not doing too well, largely outsaled by vive, which is more expansive but.... less closed heh

Are you asking if FB will exist in 3 years? OFC.

He'll be 45 in 4 years?

You only have to be 35 to run for president.

Hmm maybe I should run, apparently you don't even have to be natural born as long as you can make a good birth certificate forgery.

Millennials and younger still find out surveillance culture creepy and understand that all of Zuck's wealth comes from spying on them right?

Yes, but that doesn't mean we should quit.

as gen Z were pretty split on the issue, we grew up with mass surveilance and our entire lives being recorded on the net so a lot of us just dont see it as an issue, but some of us have begun suffering with extreme paranoia, especially since snowden

They find it creepy but are also the most likey to not let that stop them from using a billion different sketchy apps and shit.

inb4 liberals totally ignore the conflicts of interest.

I'd rather vote for Kanye.....

I just got a targeted facebook ad that said Reddit Conspiracies are lies and to turn in suspected thought criminals in order to gain benefits and Farmville coins in the coming new world social order.

If America wants a Jew for president, make it Jon Stewart, not Zuckerberg, please!!!!

not that I do or dont believe you, but can you post a source?

Minimum age of candidacy for POTUS is 35. Zuckerberg will be 34 in 2020. 2024, maybe, but i still cant see it tbh. That said, who would have predicted Trump in 2008 (except maybe the simpsons).

Only because he's been talking about it ever 4 years since the 80s

Millions of morons vote every election. Welcome to democracy.

And millions of people think you are the moron. Does that mean you are?

Differing opinions on the world doesn't make someone a moron, it just means their life experience is very different from yours.

Why is this on /r/conspiracy? Are you just fucking autistic?

Not as autistic as cuckerberg

Because he can't be trusted. He's the government's messiah that WILL drastically further implement the surveillance state.

Rather him than Trump. He is a far better business man and has never gone bankrupt. He is also a globalist which is a good thing in my book.

Government is not a business. Anyone that think you need to run the government like a business is a fucking idiot Trump voter.

The role of government is to increase profits for share holders and do as little as possible to keep the citizenry alive.

The role of Government is to implement and sustain services for the public.

nice b8

I've poked around a bit, but can't find anything.

As my girlfriend's dad says, can you prove up? With enough information, I feel like this would be a great discussion to have with him. We both have a love for discussing conspiracies and all things relevant to this country.

If Trump can do it, anyone can.

My thoughts exactly

Nah President Trump is a marketing genius.

wait why does everyone hate zuck? because he started a website you willfully gave your livelihood over to?

Pretty much. It's a weird thing. People just love to shove their agency on some authority for some reason, and then hate them for losing control.

I hate him out of jealousy. Lucky lil fuck.

he can't win. he's too young.

He's too awkward and a puppet of China

That'll piss off your current Russian puppet!

According to who?

He can't seriously be considering running for president. Anyone got a solid source on this?

Remind me ! 42 months

Who started this rumor? Mark Zuckerberg?

SO in 2020, we're looking at The Rock, Kanye, and Zuckerberg in the run for President. WTF is happening? The world has well and truly gone to SHIT!

I hope the UK doesn't follow suit... your running a country, it's not a reality TV show! Stupid thing is, he will probably win and have the rock as VP ?!?!

I'm lucky to be a Scotsman who lives in Australia. We're away from all the POTUS and Brexit nonsense ;)

But yep, it's about running a country, not trying to pull in tv ratings. I'm truly embarrassed for the US.

Ah brexit, something else that felt more like a competition than a political vote. Who could spew the most for the most claps. Then when all said and done, people quit and no one had a plan.

Im thinking about leaving the UK too. Australia or Canada are the front runners.

By then we have made it full circle, from that point on people are so retarded that the sane will have to found new secret societies stay in touch with reality.

Last year has taught me that morons will vote for literally anyone. And there are morons across the political spectrum.

Yeah, can't believe how much votes Hillary actually got. smh....

And Trump, yes. One was a man baby plutocrat demagogue and one was a calculating Mafia boss.

8 years to enjoy, keep on crying, please....

I am confused by your comment, I have to assume you are one of the cultists?

Sorry, three years. Hope this helps.

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

"no fucking way they'd vote for that guy"

• every single democrat in 2016

I hate Zuckerberg but this is pretty funny coming from a Trump supporter.

Is he libra or conservative,?

A Taurus actually

2020 candidates: Zuckerberg, Tom from Myspace, and Kanye West. We're all fucked.

I might vote for Jonathan from Spotify.

Did he ever get approached about that statement and did he reply to it?

I'd absolutely vote for him.

who cares. split the leftist vote even more. trump 2020 will be a landslide regardless.

Zuckerberg vs Kanye West 2020?

r/bullshit

Source or fuck off

I'm ready to delete FB after this election, so much liberal bullshit voicing their incorrect opinions and hate. Didn't login for the entire campaign, only used messenger.

Incorrect opinions? Please elaborate.

Jesus I don't know which is scarier, Hillary getting in, or this guy, because he has a very good chance of winning with all the morons who salivate over facebook. He has an open, constantly updating forum to push his campaign.

Why does everyone hate zuckerberg? I'm not from America, so I'm assuming he's in the news over there much more. All I've seen is that he's trying to eradicate disease in our lifetime?

Why do people like Zuckerberg? I mean, Elon Musk, he seems cool and he's made space travel and electric cars cool. Steve Jobs could sell water to a fish, people loved him and they loved the products he was able to bring to market. But Zuckerberg has done what? Made billions by selling your information in exchange for ads? Do people care about who the CEO of Facebook is? Sure, many people use Facebook, but many people use google and reddit but i doubt they know the name of anyone in charge of either company.

Is he actually running though? I can't find news articles about it

History's repeating itself.

Don't worry. After Trump finishes destroying the world, no one will vote for a businessman for quite awhile.

I wish people would ban Fb. I went off 6 months ago and thought I'd miss it and I don't whatsoever. Ugh the time I wasted on that self centered, drama filled network.. Now I spend all my time with my fellow redditors 😊

I don't think he will make it far. Sure Donald trump set the groundwork for unconventional elections and campaigning, but the dude was also 70 and had been around the block a bit to know a thing or two. Zuckerberg would only be what...36? Good luck. Maybe when he is older.

Dreamers... there won't be an inhabitable world left in 2020.

It makes perfect sense. He's the left's Donald Trump so why not?

Is he even old enough?

Let the meme war begin.

He'll run, but lose because instead of voting his fans will just only share Facebook statuses.

He will lose because voters won't find the "like" button in the voting booth.

Holy fuck this would be completely disastrous for the USA and the rest of the world. That snot nosed little prick would send your country full speed down the shitter.

So did we pave the way for uneducated business men to hold office now

Fuck zuck I rather have David Shapiro as president.

Source that he's considering an election run?

Tbh millions voted for Trump.

Millions of morons voted for Trump so...

Everyone is going to try running in 2020 it'll be a circus. Even Ron Pearlman says he will run for president lol

I'd vote for him

Especially if the alternative is trump.

No they won't. They'll be voting for The Rock, and with Danny Trejo as his running mate they can't lose!

Mark Z can't even get along with his neighbors.

Source?

It makes sense now that you see the possibility of him filtering the "fake news" I don't like this one bit.

He'll be a better president that Donald Trump that's for sure. That being said, I don't believe he is even thinking about running for president, that's ridiculous. It's just a childish notion bound to keep the retards entertained

And that's disturbing to me...

And yet trump said the same thing about Republicans and you still voted him in...

He'll never win over anyone but millennials. Older and middle-aged Americans will see a scrawny, awkward, geeky guy in a hoodie standing lecturing them about issues he doesn't understand. He will stammer, freeze, sweat and be generally quiet during debates. It will fail, and it'll be fun to watch it fail.

Sauce?

Just another example of the power of the youth vote. However, as always, they won't show up at the ballot box even when getting a reminder on their Facebook page.

Let's also remember that money doesn't guarantee the Presidency. Remind me again how much HRC spent, which got her what? Bo Didley squat!

I really don't get how you people see Zuckerberg and get outraged because he's a corporate billionaire, but then cheer for Trump who's put Exxon and Goldman Sachs.

Like the only difference between the two is Zuckerberg likes gun control and is a Jew.

Assuming that Facebook knows majority of its users views, he can use that againts the people. I think that'll be a severe conflict of interest.

The first Jew president!

The electoral process is so convoluted that Dukerberg has a little chance.

Anything's possible, and expect the worst,look at the president now.

Miggs, you dumb fuck. Except, instead of Miggs, America.

It'll be like that TV show, if he uses the info from their fb profiles for his campaign.

Still won't be old enough.

Where did you hear he was going to run?

Zuckfuck only has one massive problem... TRUMP.

Trump just fucking wins.

He made this announcement approximately 20 minutes after announcing that he's no longer an atheist. Totally unrelated, I'm sure.

He can't win; America hates beta-dorks. You've got to bring some kind of cool, or at least alpha nature, to the proceedings.

He'd get eaten alive in the debates.

Hate to blow a hole in your hermetic plan, but Zuckerberg won't meet the age requirement in 2020.....

You ever heard Fuckerturd talk? The dude has zero charisma, and zero chance at winning.

Well, statistically most presidents win their second term.

Zezmia for president

Is he running as an independent? Pretty sure the dems won't have him and trump will more than likely run again.

He also pays his taxes, which makes him not smart.

I've been living under a rock, so can someone explain why Mark Zuckerberg is so universally hated ?

I don't know a single person he would vote for this turd

He's got my vote. Just to piss off the right.

Is this verified? Or is it just one of those unverified allegations?

He's too much of an ass to get anywhere

Why would he ever want to run for president? He is a billionaire and all it will do is polarize some group to hate him.

Cuckerburg for president?

AAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHHHHAHAHAHAHA YEAH FUCKING RIGHT!

He won't win. No one likes him.

Is that comment on video anywhere?

Just need to run that on repeat during a 30 second commercial segment.

Trump vs Zuckerberg 2020...but I'LL STILL WRITE IN RON PAUL

I think I would have voted for Hillary before Zuckerberg.

Wasn't Stephen Colbert going to run a few years back, but was told he can't because he is to popular?

I've started to see all these stunts like Michael Callow kicking the soccer ball around... So obviously fake and disgusting.

Fuck facebox and fuck zuck

Why would anyone vote for an out of touch billionaire who wanted to create a website to date girls? Seems a little misogynistic to me.

I would vote for Zuck...

Zark Fuckerberg

I don't think Americans will take well to him. Zero charm bad reputation. Hell no.

Why the fuck can't billionaires just stfu and enjoy their money. Why is it always more, more, more with them? Christ.

That's the kind of personality it takes to become a billionaire. Nothing is ever enough.

Follow the money

26 U.S. Code § 1043 - Sale of property to comply with conflict-of-interest requirements

Cabinet picks to save millions in taxes thanks to ethics rules

The benefit was used to great effect when Henry Paulson, then chief executive of Goldman Sachs, was nominated by President George W. Bush to serve as treasury secretary. Paulson sold roughly half a billion dollars' worth of Goldman stock and used the benefit to avoid what the Economist estimated was $200 million in taxes

Section 1043, introduced during the George H. W. Bush administration, essentially says that an officer or employee of the executive branch or a judicial officer who is required to divest any property to comply with federal conflict of interest rules can defer paying taxes on capital gains.

The Million Moron March

The same morons who voted for Trump and Clinton.

*Citation needed

Rofl

I'm worried about the implications of someone with that much influence running, he can just delete anything positive about the other candidate like the reddit admins tried but more successfully.

He hasn't done shit. What? He donated $$ to Newark, NJ once! Big deal. Fuck off twat bagel

Rule 10, first warning.

He doesn't even look like a man, he looks like a pudgy jew boy. No one will vote for this fuck.

I don't think anyone would vote for a 36 year old with zero experience anyway.

Mark Cuban is the far more likely billionaire candidate.

He has the charisma of a damp rag and the face of a dolt

He has one of those punchable faces and he is not pleasant to look at.

Where is anyone legitimately talking about Mark Zuckerberg running for president?

How can he? He has the charisma of a paving stone.

Uh source on the presidential run?

Can you post a link for proof of him saying this?

When I hear his name, I immediately think "censorship". This guy is bad news

Better him than trump

Source?

So he would be worse than trump??

Nah man, it's all tied down to Kanye or Musk 2020!

Well I don't use Facebook and personally, nobody here who uses it has a right to complain. It's a societal garbage dump that's stunk up the world. Good job people.

Dude, is this for real?

This'll be a good way to secure Trump for another 4 years. Lol!

Honestly though, we already have a reality star as our president. With our social media obsession, it makes sense to have the founder of the biggest social media whatever the fuck fb is as the next president. I mean, this is where we're headed.

This is our skin now.

Here is his campaign logo...

https://youtu.be/ktfy79rkLEg

Remember his illuminati jacket lol?

he isn't wrong in saying that. people post everything about their lives on social media, its insane

It's weird how rapidly America is becoming Idiocracy.

Wait... any source on the idea that he's gearing up for a presidential run?

Running for president would kill Facebook. Most of his wealth is in Facebook equity. He'd literally make himself poor running. (Well, poor by multi-billionaire terms.)

Kanye West.. Zuckerberg... I think its all downhill from here.

An Independent candidate will never win and you all know this.

Trump/Zuckerberg 2020

he kind of look like a lesbian so will that count as breaking the glass ceiling

My vote is for Tom. He's always been my friend.

haha

tom...

Dude is kicking people out of their island. Maybe he knows that people will want to kick him into an island in the near future, so he makes sure he is going to pullout the Escobar some day.

Yeezy 2020

Looks like Zark fuckerberg is going to own all of our shit

All hail king zark

What a fuckerberg

Fuck worrying about Trump or Hillary, this guy will actually fuck the world over and make a massive profit while doing it.

If this really makes it just leave the country.

It's just so shit that it's literally unbelievable.

He tells it like it is, he's not your run of the mill politician. He's already a billionaire so he's actually giving up a lot in order to help this country out.

The DNC will have to pick between a load of libtard celebrities for their next run. Zuckerberg, Michelle Obama, whomever else with zilch political experience they can lay their hands on.

The RNC will have to polish up Giant Cheeto and hope for the best.

Donald Trump lowered the bar for presidents. Now anyone will try. Kanye. Zuckerberg. Whomever.

Man, that is like saying "And the CIA is naming Mark as its presidential candidate." but for real!

Can you imagine the head of an intelligence agency putting forth a presidential (cough George Bush cough) candidate? And what might happen?

This is despicable in so many ways. I don't doubt an overthrow of the government is coming now...

Well I wont vote for Suckerburg. The USA doesnt need idiots like this at all. he should move out of the USA.

It'll never happen for him

Need links please, will not accept baseless hearsay. Thank you Good Samaritan.

He'll be 35 and is a natural born citizen - why shouldn't he be allowed to run?

Of course he'll be allowed...We're worried about a bunch of morons going no deeper than, "Hey, that's the guy who created Facebook! That makes him super smart and stuff, so yeah I'll vote for him!"

Isn't it sad that we think Americans are too dumb and too sheeply to not elect this guy. We have zero faith in the American electorate to think critically and to make their own decisions. It makes one feel powerless.

Where is the conspiracy behind this?

Politics IS conspiracy. So is Fascistbook. He's Bilderberg and got money from a CIA funding guy.

How Big Brother Seeded the Tech Revolution - Corbett Report Extras - Published on Jan 24, 2017 - In this episode of our EyeOpener Report James Corbett presents the latest revelations about Steve Jobs' security clearance with the Department of Defense, the history and examples of the disturbing government connections, stockholdings, regulations and infiltrations when it comes to technology companies, and how the Department of Defense, the NSA, the Department of Homeland Security, In-Q-Tel and other agencies are quietly opening doors and writing checks for the technology industry's chosen few.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ET2E0KfSPDc

Links or it didn't happen.

I'm not saying I like the guy, but he said that when he was 19 y/o...He was probably just trying to show off. And by the way, millions of morons vote every election, it's kinda hard to avoid that.

Source he is even remotely thinking about running? News to me......

Good. Hell run democrat surely, and get obliterated.

Source? Or just throwing that out there?

Fuck Zuck in the Butt.

I think Kanye has a better chance than Zuckerberg. And people hate Kanye, so that's saying something.

I argue against assassinating presidential candidates, it only turns them into martyrs, so it's politically counterproductive. ...but Fuckerberg isn't a presidential candidate yet, so I recommend he get brain cancer with severe dementia. ...if he doesn't already have it, I can't tell.

He isn't.

Zuckerbeg the same anti-gun Jew who has armed guards defending his $100 million fortress home?

Trump: " more energy tonight Zuck I like that."

He is descendent of John D. Rockefeller. He has about as much in common with you as you have with a sea chiton. He is an owner of "the system" a sweetheart relationship with the Rothschild. They have an "understanding". As such he is also feeding all your god damn vainglorious faces the *their surveillance state. So, as such, you are "dumb fucks"!!!!

Cannot even begin to describe how bad of an idea that would be.

That would be too good to be true for Trump. Could you imagine a debate with Trump? Zuckerberg getting flustered, sweating, and being forced to take off his hoodie...if you like Trump, you should be praying for this to happen.

Not Zuck, bu Sheryl Sandberg will.

Fake news

He said he's not running

That's an excellent point, but don't you think everyone will have abandoned fb by then? I mean- it's zuck.

Ugh this is nightmare fuel. I usually dig r/conspiracy but your (perfectly logical) logic has killed me down. I need a bubble-bath to wash off this thought! Ack.

Hillary didn't win because she wasn't selected

haha wow way to roll over for your masters lol. no they wont

but FB is already 8 years old

It was officially launched (just about) 13 years ago, and open to the public roughly 10 years ago. Just clarifying, not trying to pick a fight or anything.

If he runs, facebook needs to be terminated beforehand, well in advance, otherwise that 100% is an illegitimate presidency IMO.

Nope. Scar was the one true king.

got any good sources i maybe able to do research from?

he wont make it as an independent and at this point both parties are running towards their extremes.

I sadly don't see any reason it won't last forever. People are addicted. Just like TV. There aren't enough principled/aware people to put a dent in its endlessly growing membership.

Google should be telling you a lot more than that.

Don't confuse the issue by asking for facts

Oh please, not the real paul is dead crap. Theres no way that one is true.

There is none. It's the usual bullshit.

It was an anonymous leak so it's up to you wether you want to believe it or not. Here's an article on the subject.

I second the source request. Anonymous leaks don't count as sources unless they are from reliable/verifiable publishers.

The CIA and Russia thing is all from anonymous sources. CNN hosts quote anonymous insiders 24/7. At this point anonymously sourced information implies a talking point/message/propaganda. It usually means someone has an agenda.

It warrants skepticism and further investigation at least.

Marilyn monroe was enema'd to death. With such a large amount of drugs that she would of physically passed out before the lethal amount.

Someone sat there and had an enema up her ass for about 45 minutes pumping in those benzo's. Enema parties were big around that time with the social "elite".

Except several of those are documented truth. MK ultra, the Gulf of Tonkin, and operation paperclip can't be denied even by the staunchest skeptics.

Who's Paul McCarthy?

I try to developer those things in real life. Believe it or not, it's more satisfying.

Social networks are social media, and reddit is social media, it's just not a social network.

Social media sites all pretty much have the same content though, presented in differing ways.

Reddit is also almost the same age as facebook - not a newer generation of social media, the same generation.

NO it was Gordon Hunt, one of the Hunt Brothers. It was a cancer virus attached to a needle. The needle was built into a pair of custom boots that Hunt insisted Bob put on.

They then convinced Bob to go to a 'special doctor' in Europe, who finished his cancer off with accelerating drugs.

The CIA was concerned Marley would become the next Global JFK or Mandella, so they had him killed.

I remember this from a rolling stone article many decades ago.

A lot of people cringed. But I can assure you, millions of people were swayed by her speeches.

A rich patriot?

I'm pretty sure this is what happened/continues to happen. "But but WE told you it was illegal to look at wikileaks! Why won't anyone listen to us!?!?" said CNN.

Honestly this whole thread reeks of "agenda".

This is /r/conspiracy. Do you really think people here care about sources or evidence?

Trump had charisma and knew how to work the media.

Zuckerberg has neither. He's just a rich guy.

Which is exactly why I enjoy reddit more than I did enjoy fb

And is still kind of a fucked up site

spez

What were your thoughts on how Trump handled his potential conflicts of interest?

How is Cointelpro not on your list?

This is our skin now.

I would love that - I just that think it's too entrenched and too many people wouldn't care or understand even if dirty laundry were aired...though I guess all you'd need is the stock price to start to stumble and go from there.

3 pops to the dome

I guess so. I think you're selling Kevin a little shore on the decent front. I'm not saying Trump isn't evil, but Kevin is a special kind of evil.

Tried to get him to sell when they updated their "fake news" filter

Some of his plastics still say Kayne too.

Back to back embarrassments

remains to be seen..

Trump was fiercely loved by that small percent though. I don't think there are very many people who "fiercely" love zuck

Seriously, I see so many quotes in r/conspiracy with no source. It should be easy to link to a source for quotes, it's not like asking for the missing Majestic 12 papers.

Yes.