The reason the FBI won't release all the CF, Clinton, Huma-Weiner emails--even though they are gmail, a federal crime has been committed, and is not governmental--is because Google is in fact, a CIA program

454  2017-01-24 by 911bodysnatchers322

They can't have it both ways.

They can either disclose because not doing so is a violation of the Public Records Act and Freedom of information Act

OR

They can come forward and say, "Guys, Google is CIA. It started out as a CIA program called INQTEL, then became GOOGLE then became ALPHABET (kind of to mock you btw, hehe sorry about that), and now it's used to spy on you and everything you do and to integrate with every device you have and to continue invade not only your informationscape but also your mind by shaping the news and search results in favor of hillary and blocking pizzagate investagations and blocking pedo results--oops, sorry about that also"

They can't have it both ways

And if they do

We will NEVER EVER trust them again. AND..... some of us will run from you as fast as we can when alternatives are there.

And finally, we will be making financial instruments, new types of business entities, and bulletproof EULAs and other legal mechanisms to ensure that the US Government can never be allowed entry into our private affairs and if they are we will be enabled to name a price on asset forfeiture of our own, using microstates and ad-hoc hacktivist collectives to asymmetrically defund your donors and supporters in stociastic and absolutely indefeatable way, funnelling all seizures through multiple ad-hoc proxy networks over numerous different currencies, fungible formats at a tightly integrated and lightning pace so that it would take lifetimes to ever figure out where the money went.

OK,

So don't test us

We built all your shit

We can unbuilt the same

61 comments

Spot on, spot on.

True statement.

I've noticed this as well. Always great content and constructive from OP Author

Yesssss. Preachhhh

U/911bodysnatcher322 is a goddamn legenf around these here parts, you can say his name!

You are good.

Love you 911bodysnatchers!!!!

CIA doesn't spy on Americans. NSA does.

The director of the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, issued an extraordinary apology to leaders of the US Senate intelligence committee on Thursday, conceding that the agency employees spied on committee staff and reversing months of furious and public denials.

http://archive.is/AA57n

Gilman Louie is a former CEO of In-Q-Tel — the CIA firm investing especially in start-ups developing data mining technology. In-Q-Tel was founded in 1999 by the CIA’s Directorate of Science and Technology, under which the Office of Research and Development (ORD) — which was part of the Google-funding MDSS program — had operated. The idea was to essentially replace the functions once performed by the ORD, by mobilizing the private sector to develop information technology solutions for the entire intelligence community.

Great article shining light on INQTEL, the intelligence community and Google.

http://archive.is/R6OmQ

So google et all are basically what they did for weaponry via privatizing defense manufacturing. Amazing.

And aren't required to follow the same laws as the government

I understand what you're saying, and I realize that Google is under control.

But I suspect that the information on the server contained high level national secrets. There are rumors that the server was planted there to mislead foreign intelligence, but that she also put actual intelligence on the server to sell to foreign powers.

So, it would require disclosing the whole move. The fact that the stolen documents were fake, and that some of the stuff on there really was very top secret, and was being sold.

explain why State/CIA under HRC were using a shoddy insecure 'cloud' commercial email system for security documents between Washington and Afghanistan.

it was as bad as the nazis Germans being stupid enough to believe 'Enigma' was secure because it seemed too complex to decode.

explain why State/CIA under HRC were using a shoddy insecure 'cloud' commercial email system for security documents between Washington and Afghanistan.

Level 1 explanation: she was stupid Level 2 explanation: to leak bullshit to foreign powers thinking they were hacking real secrets Level 3 explanation: to sell secrets to foreign powers and have plausible deniability, and tie the hands of investigators

I don't see how the Google-CIA connection is related to the emails here, or are these two different stories?

Why would Huma and Clinton's emails reveal anything about the In-q-Tel-Google? Did either of them work for either organization?

And finally, we will be making financial instruments, new types of business entities, and bulletproof EULAs and other legal mechanisms to ensure that the US Government can never be allowed entry into our private affairs and if they are we will be enabled to name a price on asset forfeiture of our own, using microstates and ad-hoc hacktivist collectives to asymmetrically defund your donors and supporters in stociastic and absolutely indefeatable way, funnelling all seizures through multiple ad-hoc proxy networks over numerous different currencies, fungible formats at a tightly integrated and lightning pace so that it would take lifetimes to ever figure out where the money went.

You've been reading too much Neal Stephenson. Sounds cool, doesn't refer to anything in reality.

We built all your shit

I thought the CIA built it?

We can unbuilt the same

You can never read too much Neal Stephenson and William Gibson. Especially in the context of our society now.

Neil Stephenson bored me to death with Cryptonomicon. One of very few books I didn't finish after starting. Diamond Age which had an interesting take on nano technology but story wise didn't really get me either.

This doesn't really make a lot of sense... mostly the headline is what I'm talking about... this post itself is alright after the "OR" part though.

It's pretty obvious these were influenced by your previous searches.

http://i.imgur.com/gwqfXtP.png

Can people stop posting searches as proof? Google does it for literally anyone. Try searching "Trump rape" or "Trump grab them by the " and you get no predictive searches mentioning the topics even tho it was a huge thing during the elections

sorry if facts hurt

Google literally hides bad things from displaying in search for everyone.

I was there for the election. I remember seeing Google block damaging autocompletes for Clinton while leaving them up for Trump. I remember when Trump's face came up next to Hitler's in the search results page. I remember when Trump didn't show up in a result for presidential candidates. I even have screenshots of their misdeeds saved on a hard drive somewhere (admittedly, I'm not sure which one at this point).

Anyone who comes along after the fact and suggests that Google "does it for literally anyone" is either being disingenuous or wasn't paying attention at the time and subsequently bought into some bull$#!+ someone else told them.

I'll give it to you that they didn't list him as a candidate at one point, however, when the whole thing about clinton search result came up, I remember trying it out myself and not getting anything negative for any of the other candidates (Trump, Bernie, ...).

Very fitting after that article. Thanks for the pic! I avoid Google search most of the time. Only when not getting decent results do I use them. (And not for anything too sensitive)

This is an interesting yet disturbing read. I actually fear the future.

they sold us out for MBA 'efficiencies' and profits for a few.

We've been sold out since the Fed was created. They sealed it after the CIA was created.

Double sealed after patriot Act.

Yes...

Can someone tl;dr that text?

Also what is NOC?

It's really worth a read on its own but essentially google is doing a lot of things that are usually reserved for government state depts and intelligence agencies. Also when Assange thought he was meeting with google employees,which he was, but they almost all had state dept. backgrounds as well

I'll try to read it when I get home, but damn it was a wall of text.

Thanks for that summary, really clarifies things.

Now the question just remains.. how the heck do I de-Google my digital life.. it has fucking nestled itself into everything at this point

Yeah I went through the privacy settings and luckily I had most stuff turned off in terms of collecting my data (I'm sure they do anyways). But even still they had every single YouTube video I had watched while signed into chrome with my gmail account going back over 5 years. I deleted everything and try and make a habit of using incognito and never signing into to anything google related if I don't have to

Get anonymous email and sign in with that.

I have separate "fake" emails for Facebook, Reddit and google going

r/dropgoogle

Non official cover. As in CIA is questioned if Eric Schmidt is an agent and they say he's not an agent even though he very well is

Ah alright! Thanks for the explanation

it's called a "legend".....a made up life.

Thank you for posting this. This excerpt tells the reality of today's political climate: "The received wisdom in advanced capitalist societies is that there still exists an organic “civil society sector” in which institutions form autonomously and come together to manifest the interests and will of citizens. The fable has it that the boundaries of this sector are respected by actors from government and the “private sector,” leaving a safe space for NGOs and nonprofits to advocate for things like human rights, free speech, and accountable government. This sounds like a great idea. But if it was ever true, it has not been for decades. Since at least the 1970s, authentic actors like unions and churches have folded under a sustained assault by free-market statism, transforming “civil society” into a buyer’s market for political factions and corporate interests looking to exert influence at arm’s length. The last forty years has seen a huge proliferation of think tanks and political NGOs whose purpose, beneath all the verbiage, is to execute political agendas by proxy.

I believe the Snowden leaks verify that google is not part of the gov...

ProtonMail is better than gmail ANYWAY.

ProtonMail is ENCRYPTED, is free, and is even simpler to use than gmail.

The person on the left in this pic looks like an alien

You've done it again. A+

Chrome is the most popular browser in use right now too.

Chromium has numerous forks. SRware Iron is a good one.

Google may be evil, but I still think Chrome and search are the best of their kind, as far as functionality goes (not counting the privacy issues)

Just googled 'tin foil hat' and this post was the top hit.

next google painful facts

Would you mind providing a list of approved conspiracy theories for us to discuss?

Where are the Google 10 weeks of Wikileaks leaks. Did Assange ever get asked about it? It was clearly supposed to be part of the 10 weeks anniversary thing.

where is the walk by the window

So in all that senseless rambling did you present a single piece of evidence that Google is CIA?

No. You didn't.

Why are the release of the documents and ggogle even paired as a thing you're claiming? Makes no sense, like why would the release be "having it both ways"

Literally asking because I've been working a lot and can't follow it closely - how do we know a federal crime has actually been committed? I mean ACTUALLY with links.

international crimes, the Libyan "target list" for example.

Read the State Dept. Inspector General report. It details the many many instances of sending top secret and higher classified documents to uncleared persons.

That's a felony.

So don't test us We built all your shit We can unbuilt the same

All fine and dandy, but that empty threat at the end screams impotent rage. Grow up.

what we do have is enough to put many in prison for life.

Libyan "target list" for example, thats assassination and murder.

HRC/State using Gmail for insecure transmission of govt security docs to and from Afghanistan. USgovt is swiss cheese for foreign intelligence orgs

No I thought I had heard that the emails they found were from an outlook account?

SRWare Iron is a more secure fork of chromium.

Assange wrote a book about google... They are a branch of the CIA.

The CIA is not supposed to conduct operations inside the US, but they do.

I posted this separately yesterday and it's relevant here. Not related to emails but supports the theory that Google = CIA.

The last paragraph is chilling. Why would Google create this? Is this just for YouTube comments?

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603072/if-only-ai-could-save-us-from-ourselves/

George Webb believes Russia and China have them all. And if they release them before we do anything, our country would probably be ripped apart.

In case you feel like nothing ever makes a difference in the world, I just wanted to let you know that this post was the thing that pushed me over the edge on using Android/Gmail. I already was not using Play Services on my AOSP Nexus 5X, and had fielded a cheap iPhone 5s as a second line, and have moved away from Google search as much as possible...but yeah, today was the day. Soon as my iPhone SE comes, I'm retiring all my Android stuff and am going to systematically close down my Gmail accounts.

Not saying Microsoft and Apple are that much better, but...man, just...f--k Google. And Schmidt especially. It's a shame that Gboard and Maps are the best virtual keyboard and nav software on Apple, but you don't have to log into them, or even let Gboard talk to the Internet, so...

Anyway, just wanted to say thanks for that final shove.

We've been sold out since the Fed was created. They sealed it after the CIA was created.