Answer to Jet Engine tweet?

116  2017-02-07 by andywarhaul

The cryptic tweets have been on my mind all day and I've done more research into what the engine really is and what makes it special.

The F-22 is the plane it powers, it uses two of these bad boys. Pumping out 35,000 lbs of thrust each. Powerful engines. But the F-22 is a stealth fighter and it needs to make the least amount of noise possible. The F119 (engine) helps it do just that.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_F119

So basically afterburners make a lot of noise, this engine allows the plane to enter supercruise which is cruising at or above the speed of sound, without using afterburners therefore making it more quiet. So it adds greatly to the stealth properties of the plane.

There are only a couple engines that can do this and they are listed in the super cruise link. Besides those listed I believe the Russia PAK FA engine (in development with India Who are using GEs F414 which is also going in new F/A18s) is one of the only other engines. What you'll notice is that the Chinese don't have an engine that can enter supercrusie without afterburners.

Their new upcoming fighter jet is the J-20. Less than 10 prototypes have been built and are currently using prototype engines.

This is worth a read on their situation:

https://www.google.ca/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN0V7083

A lot of speculation that the J-20 is a F-22 rip off

https://fightersweep.com/6230/analysis-chengdu-j-20-the-chinese-raptor/

https://defensetech.org/2015/09/29/lawmaker-chinese-j-31-j-20-mirror-american-f-35-f-22/?mobile=1

https://www.google.ca/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3893126/amp/Chinese-J-20-stealth-jet-based-military-plans-stolen-hackers-makes-public-debut.html

They talk about China hacking the US there

Also important to note a couple other things. Clintons first trip abroad as Sec of State was to Asia. The last stop was in China. This is February '09. http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/10/hillary-clinton-china-opinions-columnists_0211_gordon_chang.html

It's shortly after this time that the J-20 started going into production.

My guess here is that Wikileaks has evidence of the F119 plans or secrets whatever being sold to the Chinese. Supercruise is vital to 5th generation fighters so to suggest china would build a 5th hen stealth plane with afterburners is ridiculous. They need the afterburner free supercruise

Edit: fucked up a link, clarification on F414

43 comments

Solid theory and good write up.

Thanks

Selling State secrets is what FBIAnon said Hillary did. It wouldn't surprise me, would suit the character. This is an interesting hypothesis OP, thank you.

FBIanon did also say arrests were going to happen this week, well? It's Tuesday and nothing yet.

I'm talking about the FBIAnon from last summer; a lot of what he said has panned out since then. He also said that if Trump became president, the child traffickers and abusers would go down.

As per this recent FBIAnon, afaik there's no way to verify it's the same (group of) person(s).

Great post

UPVOTED

So... The theory is that Clinton sold government/private secrets, for profit?

I mean, she obviously did run a huge pay to play scheme, but WL has already exposed that through the Pedosta mails.

I think the "give us FBI vault 7 or we expose 911" theory that was discussed yesterday actually holds more water as the explanation of this tweet.

WikiLeaks doesn't really play the 'give us this or we will release that' game, if they have something worth releasing it they've proven to release it in a timely manner once they can verify authenticity and redact names of people directly effected regardless of what someone else has. I do believe they are warning something is coming out, but it isn't their style to make threats. It especially isn't their style to hold back info if someone else comes through to release other info. Truly though I suppose with the lack of info and such grave tweets anything could be happening lol, just my thoughts based on WikiLeaks previous track record.

I still don't get why people think this at all related to 9/11

From F119. In the UK, where Julian is, the date is DD/MM/YYYY, compared to the US standard date format MM/DD/YYYY.

F119 => 11/9 (UK) = 9/11 (US)

Seems like kind of a leap to me, is that really all people are going on? I feel like there are much better ways to convey 9/11 that aren't so strangely specific

I'm just saying that's where people got the idea from. People on this sub have drawn larger conclusions off of less. Personally I think the tweets are meaningless until whole. We're interpreting at the moment a subset of the full message.

This is what FBIAnon said she did. It wouldn't surprise me, would suit thencharacter. This is an interesting hypothesis OP, thank you.

Bill and Al were in their pockets , pretty safe to assume that wifey was too.

https://spectator.org/chinagate-and-the-clintons/

Good post OP

I thought it was a tongue in cheek "jet fuel melts steel beams" reference and all 3 were referring to 911 stuff.

But this is a brilliant idea. Word on the street is the Chinese are the group most angry with Clinton. And I've heard other stories of China's struggles to build a decent jet engine.

So we got:

Seed Bank = life insurance (weiner laptop)

Friendly Fire = 911 inside job

Jet Engine = Clinton selling top secret jet engine designs to China

Holy shit. I want Assange to be safe...but this will be just out of control if released.

Where are you getting friendly fire from?

The post with the twin towers labeled friendly fire.

https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/828229304949547008

I see this but no friendly fire. I'm more intrigue by the nazi loot in the salt mine pic they tweeted out in the "vault" series of tweets. Suggests profits?

Shit where did I get friendly fire from? I think I got something mixed up. Definitely saw the friendly fire image today though.

You very well may have I was just genuinely curious

It was at the beginning of a video Wikileaks retweeted about the "top 11 wikileaks revelations".

Ahh ty

Maybe suggesting Soros? He did work with the Nazis in WWII and probably amassed a lot of his fortune from Nazi gold.

Or maybe the gold found in the basement of the WTC is connected to the Merkers mine gold stash? I'm clutching at straws but figured I'd throw it out there.

It could also be implying that Soros was responsible for WTC7 collapsing and he took the gold like he did in WWII.

I dunno... the "Where is Vault 7?" stuff makes me think they are asking about FBI Vault HRC 07 of 07... most likely the last part of the HRC case on cause the timeline is catching up and I don't think there is much else in that e-mail server case left to release.

When the DOJ is clean enough to go after HRC/WJC for their Rosenberg shenanigans they are clean enough to offer Assange a fair trial. Assange sat on his bombshell after being promised this is how it would all go down.

I'm thinking it's a threat asking for part 07 or we drop this info type situation

HRC part 07 would only contain somewhat innocuous and meaningless information about the closed email server case... it wouldn't really warrant too much attention... other than the fact that it's release might signal something bigger. The flag drop to start the race. I think Assange worked out a deal with the white knights in the FBI and they are a little slow holding up their end of the deal so he's trying to "remind" them of the arrangement before he's kicked out of the embassy and into the hands of some real baddies.

That sounds about right to me. Do we know how hopefully that one Ecuadorian candidate is? Either way I definitely think the engine tweet has something to do with the J-20. Would part 07 contain the conclusion of the FBIs investigation in more detail than we know?

FBI would never relase anything related to an ongoing investigation... and there have gotta be more investigations pending into Huma and HRC... so the release of 07 would have no informational benefit to it other than to act as a signal flare between the white knights in the US IC and Assange... maybe the government even agreed to let JA release 9/11 files when the time is right, knowing that he has the street cred to make it not seem like "fake news" if it came from another outlet... if the public is to be made aware of the truth Wikileaks would prolly be the best route to disseminate that information to the general public.

I mean their conclusions at the end of email investigation,

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

This quote from Comey makes me want to see what their conclusions were, because it tells me that they caught her red handed.

Yeah... she has been caught redhanded on the classified stuff since at least HRC 05 so there aren't really any new revelations to be had on 07. It is more symbolic that informational... I give ya props for quoting Comey's July 5th letter though... he pretty much lays it all out that she is guilty as hell, but the DOJ won't bring up charges. This mishandling is the busted tail light on her car full of dead hookers and cocaine... no reasonable prosecutor would bother with the chump change charges.

Anyone paying attention knows she's guilty, but It's mighty helpful if we can point to a report and say "look the only reason she wasn't charged was because she's Hillary Clinton". I get that it's mostly symbolic if you're paying attention. I think it's much more tangible if you're in the mainstream. That said it doesn't really make a difference, it's all dependant on what happens.

As for the letter, he does lay it all out. The language he uses is great

Comey is a lawyer and a wordsmith... he's been tip toeing around all the issues because he can't comment on an ongoing investigation... I can only hope that one day everyone sees him as the hero he really is... His FBI have doings some serious investigating... once the DOJ is squeaky clean everything is gonna come to light...

But yer right about the paying attention stuff... I pay very close attention to the the FBI and Comey so this is all so obvious to me... but most people don't read 100,000 pages of redacted documents for fun.

I mean their conclusions at the end of email investigation,

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

I really love the wiggle room comfrey left for imaginative speculation.

Context of a person's actions - the act of covering up wasn't as bad as what all was being covered up

How similar situations have been handled in the past - what happens when you square up to brawl the Clintons? Ask Monica Peterson. No reasonable prosecutor...

Yeah, Comey's words to the press and the summary written by the investigating officers are going to be two wholly different things.

Fuck Comey. I want to see the investigator's conclusion.

Part 7 would likely include a write up and summary of the investigation and suspected criminal sctivity. The investigator would say, "during the course of our investigation... we found evidence suggesting HRC, Huma, etc... deleted emails... etc."

She straight face lied to a congressional inquiry, intentionally and maliciously deleted relevant emails, and obstructed an ongoing investigation.

Without even addressing issues with the DNC and manipulating votes to assure her nomination (wire/fraud).

I'm sure it's pretty juicy.

There is only a little bit of the story left to be revealed after HRC 06 and before the July 5th speech from James Comey...

That's where Comey publically says most of those types of things...

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

Or 9-11 info.

Or something coming out Feb-22nd?

I was thinking more along the lines of : F-22 hit the pentagon on 9/11, well not hit but fired a missile

Beautiful work here. It may not be glamourous but it definitely has good logic behind this theory.

Remember Clinton and her private server was speculated by many to be used to sell state secrets abroad. Which would directly go back as to why she deleted those 33k emails.

She needs to be tried for treason. No ifs, ands, or buts, if even half of this is true.

Wikileaks are keeping us busy with "mysteries" like these pics, so that we're distracted and don't research the real nefarious shit that goes on. I think these pics are a dead end. A red herring.

really solid work OP. This is actually fantastic, I'm convinced this is the actual reason.

I think you may be onto something but it doesn't involve the clintons. I believe this is a military trade secret and that assange is threatening to release proof of it if the 7th FBI file on clinton is not released. Same goes with the Nazi gold picture. Hes threatening to release info associating somebody serious with nazi ties. Assange is smart as fuck. I believe he started the whole #ProofofLife thing because he feared for his life after Trump won and knew we would be paranoid enough to always keep an eye out for anything suspicious. I think the police raid on the embassy was hinderrd in some way and he began to hide until trump was in power. Thats why he never stepped to the window to show us. Could have been shot by a special ops sniper sent by Obama.

2 Theory's: First, the photo references the date April 9th, 2010. That is the most important part of the photo since it was related to the question "When" Could be for a future date, or passed date. http://www.thepeoplehistory.com/april9th.html

The next theory is way out there. Operation Highjump in Antarctica, reference to the Germans V-7 project which correlates to jet propulsion hence the photo, and a possible future date which may be relevant to the "when".