Master Manipulator David Brock is trying to destroy David Seamans reputation. (Theory)
108 2017-02-13 by LightBringerFlex
David Seaman made a post about his source feeding him info about mass arrests and if it is wrong, then his source is compromised.
Here's what I think happened.
Master manipulator and infamous pedophile David Brock used an old trick called "flushing out the rat." Brock doesn't know who all the whistleblowers are but he does know how to flush one out. What he does is feed false info to a suspected whistleblower. If that false info errupts in media, Brock will have evidence that his suspect is the rat and he will find out who he works for. In this case David Seaman announced it so Brock wins and Seaman loses his source.
As soon as today came, David Brock began spamming everything under the sun through his ctr slaves with one message:
"Do not trust David Seaman."
This is Brock's strategy but he is going against a sub who's members can sniff this stuff out easy.
They want us to divide from David Seaman so they can isolate him and snuff out his voice. Seaman worked for huffington post and got fired for being an honest journalist but he didn't give up. He continues on through YouTube and the elite pedo club is pissed.
They want us to cut him off. They think we are as gullible as that Hillary sub or politics sub.
38 comments
n/a EricCarver 2017-02-13
Interesting and plausible. Of all the threads about Seaman today, there was one positive one about 8 hours ago. They recommended we stand by Seaman by buying his Amazon book and consider sending bitcoin. Seemed weird, but then it was wave after wave of anti-Seaman. Good post OP. Could be wrong, but it's the best guess so far.
n/a coolstuffthatiscool 2017-02-13
The joke if that post was his book is all about how to manipulate rubes on the internet.
n/a EricCarver 2017-02-13
haha, is it really? I never even looked as I am not the most familiar with him and until today it seems he was not well known.
n/a ToasterBorst 2017-02-13
He become semi-well known around these parts a week or two ago when he began a twitter rant about pizza the illuminati and aliens, then deleted most of the tweets and then his 50,000 twitter followers mysteriously disappeared for the course of the day before reappearing that night, saw it myself. His account may have also been deleted somewhere in there. That said and the shady twitter stuff aside, dude posts monetized youtube content multiple times a day and it is in his interest to generate hype. His behavior is also so far fringe that he does the majority of us a disservice in ever having serious discussions about these topics with normies..
The campaign to keep his name relevant here today though has been mind blowing.
n/a RememberSolzhenitsyn 2017-02-13
David Seaman has been looking into PG for months not a "week or two ago".
n/a ToasterBorst 2017-02-13
Bro. Read. I said he became well known around these parts a week or two ago following a twitter rant and was answering a fellow regular commentator who hadn't caught that action. Damn.
n/a RememberSolzhenitsyn 2017-02-13
And that's not true. He's been well known for months around here for his investigating into Pizzagate. Just type his name in the search bar of this sub and you can see your wrong.
n/a ToasterBorst 2017-02-13
Jesus Christ dude, I never questioned or even spoke in a manner to cast doubt about how long he has researched fringe shit. Let me rephrase, "HE BECAME WELL KNOWN TO ME A WEEK OR TWO AGO." You fuckin' happy?
n/a RememberSolzhenitsyn 2017-02-13
Sure, you actually made an accurate statement. Congratulations, I'm sorry that it was so hard for you to do that.
n/a ToasterBorst 2017-02-13
P.O.S. gas-lighting Donnie.
n/a RememberSolzhenitsyn 2017-02-13
ok
n/a pizzagate_detective 2017-02-13
He doesn't look into PG. He misrepresents information from voat to make money.
n/a space_rangers 2017-02-13
who cares
n/a coolstuffthatiscool 2017-02-13
yeah.
https://www.amazon.com/Dirty-Little-Secrets-Buzz-Attention/dp/1402213379/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1487030543&sr=1-2&refinements=p_27%3ADavid+Seaman
n/a dutsi 2017-02-13
here is him promoting the book 10 years ago, it explains a lot ablut his behavior:
David Seaman - Author of Dirty Little Secrets of Buzz
n/a EricCarver 2017-02-13
Yeah, I saw that. It is a networking podcast for ages ago.
n/a mconeone 2017-02-13
I trust David Seaman. I can accept any mistakes he may make as long as he explains why he made them.
Fuck the haters. The truth will prevail.
n/a LadyBernVictim 2017-02-13
I also trust him. He was originally fired from a major MSM paper for questioning the narrative on Hillary's health, which I consider a very brave move on his part. Brock's shills certainly have a motive to go after him.
n/a greengrapesx 2017-02-13
Very possible!
n/a outtanutmeds 2017-02-13
David Seaman makes a very good living posting videos on the internet. Why didn't he didn't he keep quiet to see if his "source" was telling the truth? If he had been patient, and said nothing, and his source ended up telling the truth, David would finally have a legitimate source for inside information; something he currently doesn't have. He then could have received a bunch more of the "insider" info from his source; knowing that everything he was being spoon-fed would come true, and it would make David look like a real, investigative reporter. David is either not as bright as he claims to be, or his followers are not too bright, and he is picking their pockets.
n/a mconeone 2017-02-13
Oh piss off traitor.
n/a outtanutmeds 2017-02-13
You really do love David Seaman, don't you. Well, he loves you too. Did you see the video where he cries for everyone? Did it make you cry? Did you send him money? If you did, it helped him to stop crying.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-02-13
Seaman makes a living on journalism. Why are you attacking him for doing his job. Journalists have to be passionate and that's what he's doing when he gets emotional. How else should he pay for his rent after being fired from huffington post? The man has bills so there is profit motive but a profit motive doesn't mean he doesn't love his job which is exposing high level pedophiles and making the world a better place.
Even that other dude selling Pizzagate Tshirts was doing the right thing. People are swamped in bills. The bills have to be paid.
n/a StinkyPetes 2017-02-13
For the most part this is correct. However, he does spend too much time talking about himself. Not that I don't understand his position, but I always shut his videos down after he's done talking about actual information. He transits into youtube views, money, his popularity....everyone has flaws, that's his.
Just the sauce David. Just the sauce. He'd get more views and gain greater respect. Which I believe is his overall goal.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-02-13
Money is the problem. If people weren't under such massive financial pressures, they would actually perform their work more accurately. When rent is coming up and there $100 in the bank, people look for creative ways to survive.
It's one thing to profit from child sex slaves but it's a little understandable when people, who are mostly desperately trying to scrounge up cash, to do things like exaggerate the effectiveness of the products they sell.
People try to do the right thing but look at mexico. Absolutely no economic productivity has lead to many cartel members. My point is that maybe we should be a bit understanding that Seaman is making money. It's better to cry and entertain for hits while getting the Pizzagate message out than be out in the street.
n/a StinkyPetes 2017-02-13
I hear you, but I'm just being honest. I do like that he digs and gets the sauce, but he talks about himself too much. That's not really reporter stuff..lol well it shouldn't be. We have infotainers now that we've gotten used to..But sort of imagine Walter Cronkite deliver a 3 minute blurb on Vietnam, then start talking about how big his audience is.
If David could transition just a bit into a more Ben Swann type delivery, he'd do SO much better overall.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-02-13
The whole point of having a source is so that David himself can relay the info quickly. He did exactly that.
n/a michaelmalak 2017-02-13
To what end? Wouldn't releasing the info potentially make the arrests more difficult?
n/a OwenMerlock 2017-02-13
Makes sense.
n/a casualjane 2017-02-13
Very possible. Irresponsible of Seaman to relay info like that, but you learn from your mistakes.
n/a accountingisboring 2017-02-13
David Seaman sunk his own ship. His twittorama today was pathetic. He should never have posted the arrest timeframe to begin with. And so when that didn't happen he went all in. He made himself look like a fool throwing a hissy fit. IMO, this didn't have anything to do with Brock.
n/a west_coastG 2017-02-13
even if it was real he shouldn't have posted it
n/a appropriatenull 2017-02-13
I'm cut and pasting this quote into every David Seaman post I see. People need to know this guy is running a scam inserting himself on the crest of a wave of internet outrage and profiting from it.
From his media manipulation guide "Dirty Little Secrets of Buzz".
David Seaman is acting out his playbook. "Dirty Little Secrets of Buzz"
If you have given this guy your time or money you've been played.
n/a wheresAMeye 2017-02-13
Isn't that kind of like saying if you've ever bought anything from a salesman then you've been swindled? We are immersed in tactics meant to grab our attention and money daily.
n/a appropriatenull 2017-02-13
The topic of paedophilia in high places is not a decent place to test drive your theories for self-serving hucksterism.
He brings nothing to the table other than his feigned hysterics and his plea for money.
n/a TheHighBlatman 2017-02-13
Holy shit! like Deep Throat and The Cancer man did to Mulder!
n/a StinkyPetes 2017-02-13
It's a good theory, but how would anyone Brock had access to, have access to information outfront of arrests?
David must name his source as he said he would if the information proved false. That will tell us all we need to know.
n/a buttholemeat 2017-02-13
I don't think this incident would hurt his credibility if he wasn't constantly freaking the fuck out on Twitter. I still follow the guy, but goddamn, he needs to relax and be a bit more professional.
n/a dutsi 2017-02-13
brock is certainly manipulative but in this case it is seaman's own clumsy attempts to 'polarize' the audience to capitalize on the 'buzz' of pizzagate. he literally wrote a book about this but his execution seems clumsy.
this video from 10 years ago explains his technique 'polarizing' the audience for benefit. the fact we are all talking about him is success based on his book:
David Seaman - Author of Dirty Little Secrets of Buzz
n/a 20_TwentyTwo 2017-02-13
Lmao this is TOO good.
n/a DoYouBooBooDoYou 2017-02-13
Sorry dude but you are likely wrong. Seaman is a partisan hack, content thief, lazy and most importantly a self promoting whore...... that is at best.
At worst he is actually a disinformation agent and might be working on his greatest piece yet. How one man convinced the Alt Right a pedo ring was run out of a pizza parlor.
My conspiracy side believes seaman is a attention whore and once his schtick is up he will lie and said he did all this to expose the Alt right. I don't think he was smart enough to plan this upfront but do believe he is the type to be shamed and instead of taking his lumps will switch teams and act like a genius.
n/a OrchardGhost 2017-02-13
I think the guy is garbage as far as what he can tell to us redpills, but damn useful for getting info out to everyone else.
This needs to stop.
n/a JoBloggs1 2017-02-13
The only conclusion I can come to with a headline like that is that David Seaman is a shill.
n/a EricCarver 2017-02-13
haha, is it really? I never even looked as I am not the most familiar with him and until today it seems he was not well known.
n/a RememberSolzhenitsyn 2017-02-13
David Seaman has been looking into PG for months not a "week or two ago".
n/a ToasterBorst 2017-02-13
Bro. Read. I said he became well known around these parts a week or two ago following a twitter rant and was answering a fellow regular commentator who hadn't caught that action. Damn.
n/a pizzagate_detective 2017-02-13
He doesn't look into PG. He misrepresents information from voat to make money.
n/a space_rangers 2017-02-13
who cares