"Time Magazine" is FakeNews: Insidious article defended Hillary Clinton by saying she was in NYC on 9/11 with a Photo as Proof---Taken on: the 12th

68  2017-02-20 by 911bodysnatchers322

Bing bing bong bong.

Guiliani apologized last Oct. for saying that Clinton had said she was in NYC on 9/11/2001[1]. She wasn't[2]. She was in DC because Congress was still in session[3].

But Guiliani was confused about an event that happened 16 yrs ago, because he was reminded about the event when Hillary had stated that she was in NYC on 9/11 in January of last year[4][5][6][7][8], so the fake news is actually her fault.

But that didn't stop TIME MAGAZINE from defending Hillary Clinton with Fake news, "Here's the Photo That Contradicts Rudy Guiliani's Criticism of Hillary Clinton"

If you'll notice the byline of the photograph, it was taken on Sept 12, 2001! Guiliani was correct. She wasn't in NYC on 9/11. She was in NYC on 9/12.

9/11 is not 9/12.

This article is a 'gotcha'. To catch and influence "Skimmers" who only read the headlines and look at the photograph and not the byline and not the content. It's an insidious new type of propaganda that I'm calling an ad attention-unspanium. It's gross that our media has become so dishonest that they have to contradict themselves in a surreptitious, sneaky way for political points within the very same article!!

Some may say this is a technicality, but time matters, except when it's a publication that lies to you. Why again was Guiliani forced to retract and apologize for remembering 9/11 correctly--when she did in fact state that she was in nyc on 9/11--when Senator Clinton was actually not in NYC but hanging out with her real friends in the State Dept?


FakeNews is Mandela's Fault

There are numerous articles debating Clinton's whereabouts on 9/11 back and forth, it's hard to know the objective material truths. Maybe there's another way...

We could of course give Hillary Clinton the benefit of the doubt and assume she is telling the truth, by applying the ontological model of her being a split-clone of herself--a quantum anomaly responsible for the disturbance of the spacetime continuum that is the Knights of Malta Mandela Effect (Berenstein/ain Bears Effect) by being in two places at once--DC and NYC.

I offer this reality-model because it wouldn't be the first time Hillary Clinton Glitched in and out of our Consensus Reality

I mean it's really one of 2 things, which I leave up to you to decide for yourself:

  • Clinton is the CIA's own Liar, and this subversive network of immature journalists who support her unquestioningly need to rekindle their relationship with facts again.
  • Preposterous Reality Shift in the Cosmological Constants of the Universe
5 comments

Aside from this, I also think it was shown with many side-by-side photos during the campaign that there was more than one 'Hillary'... Including the day she collapsed 9/11/16, in which there were two distinct individuals acting as Hillary, with different body types and facial features.

Doubles, or clones.

You are right, Clinton did say she was in NYC on 9/11 and the media reported on Guiliani's comment unfairly. One small correction though:

when Senator Clinton was actually not in NYC but hanging out with her real friends in the State Dept?

She was in the Senate, not the State Dept.

She could be in the senate while still having friends in the state department. Plus, Bill Clinton surely appointed a few that were still there?

Was she dodging sniper fire on 9/11 too?

"At that moment, my cell phone went off and it was my older brother, Mike, who's an attorney in Milwaukee, and he wanted to make sure that I was in D.C., and not in New York. I hung up the phone, and the news suddenly said the Pentagon had been attacked. And at that moment, like a lot of people, I had no idea whether the White House or the

Capitol or monuments or anything else might be attacked. My cell phone went off again. It was Mike again, and he said, "Get the hell out of there!" I said, "Bro', don't worry, I'm thinking just like you!"

So I went down on the street-the corner on the Union Station side-to try to find a cab. People were crowding into cabs, and hundreds of people seemed to come up. I'd only started walking, maybe 3o yards, when I heard a familiar voice yell, "Gene Sperling! Gene Sperling, get in the car!"

I looked up and I saw a silver car, and I was confused because all I could see were two large men in the front seat. And I finally saw that on the other side there was a woman yelling to me. It was Mrs. Clinton. I think they were less than thrilled that Mrs. Clinton was stopping at all; these are moments when the Secret Service has a mission to get her to a protected area. She asked me where I was going. I said Dupont Circle, but I could walk. She insisted. I get in-it was right on the way. It was a car ride I'll never forget. She was the first person I was really sharing this horrible, horrible day with. And you could see the different roles in her life."

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/6464