this website is garbage

http://www.voat.com
http://www.4chan.org
Etc

nice post you fucking shill

Thanks friend 😊

I'm a shill and this is a worm

()()======D~~brockbucks~~~~~

sanegoatiswear, is that you?

Oh are we listing the other examples of garbage now?

He didn't list your employer ;)

hurr duur SHILLS, amirite?

If you're this stupid, please try to educate yourself.

If you're this delusional and paranoid, please get help.

Yeah man, I'm sure you're just spamming this very thread with 20+ comments for the hell of it.

Of all the reasons I've been called a shill before, I think being interested in a topic is probably the dumbest I've heard so far.

People that accuse others of shilling are almost always morons, pathetically inept at arguing their position, incapable of coming up with a better argument than an ad hominem that is impossible to prove or disprove.

Arguing their position? Lol bro, your only contribution was calling Voat and 4chan garbage...

Thanks for cherry picking literally my only comment in this thread that was "low effort."

And if you look at it, I was calling reddit garbage too. My point is that they are all garbage.

But don't try to think about this too hard, you might hurt yourself.

Lol. What were you saying again about ad hominim? /r/iamverysmart

try harder, please

Your still here?

*you're

Nice to see you again :)

You people

What do you mean, you people?

In the interest of civility, I'd like to point to this comment you made today

It is. Shits disturbing.

I'm getting messages from trump supporters from this sub who think it's no big deal that a grown man would want to lust after children, but we're the crazy ones for calling them out..

And I'd like to invite you to read some of the things I've been writing about Milo, and those defending him.

It appears we have found some common ground, my friend.

Thats good, but if you think this website is garbage then just go.

You're just giving fuel to those morons.

You mean like this?

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

I mean like what? Your comment is nonsensical.

What are you trying to say? That, for the terrible crime of being skeptical, I MUST be a shill?

Do you honestly think someone is paying people to spend all day posting, in all places, on /r/conspiracy? hahahahahahahahahaha

People that call others shills actually do think that. They think /r/conspiracy and whatever garbage threads on Voat are just so dangerous to the establishment that there's an active agenda to discredit them by paying people to call them out on their nonsense. They think they're these golden champions about to bring down the man with the sharing of information, but everyone else sees them for what they are; weird, pale, pseudo intelligent little creatures, huddling in a corner trying to link stupid bullshit around the globe to Democrats, with the occasional outbursts that consist of "HURRLARY CLURNTON" and "BILL CLINTON IS A PEDO BECAUSE EPSTEIN, BUT NOT TRUMP EVEN THOUGH HE'S FRIENDS WITH BOTH BILL AND EPSTEIN."

Wrong.Trump denounced Epstein a long time ago.

Source?

he's calling me one too because i've discussed trump and russia before

he seems delusional

Most shill accusers do.

Calling someone a shill adds nothing to a discussion, does not further one's argument, derails the conversation, and is a distraction from the real talking points.

TBH, calling other people shills is probably a great strategy if someone is actually a shill, themselves.

There is proof of this going on.You can't deny it.And you're calling someone else stupid?You can't even read or comprehend this.

Here.Here's a shiny red ball.Go play in the corner.

Are they hiring?

Warning for rule 10, trying to be subtle doesn't wash with us.

All good, I believe his responses were vindication and proof but I shall delete my comment.

Aren't those services hotbeds of pedophiliac content? Seems odd to link to them...

They sure are but it's where free speech types go when reddit isn't good enough anymore.

But don't free speech types have everything they need here? Surely /r/conspiracy would be banned.

There is an agenda against this sub. Been going on since before the election.

If they banned the sub all us paranoid people would just go somewhere else. Far more useful to use this sub to divide/misinform/frustrate us.

i just got banned from r/news cause there trying to defend pedo's and i called them out. It's fucking crazy.

"pizzagate is real guise" Conspiracy defending Milo "I like nubile young boys of 13 years" yiannopoulos.

Thinks this site is garbage because people in this site don't approve of his deviant opinion.

MRW

Because the mods deleted a transcript of what he said. Didnt you read the original post that you responded to?

Except the didn't?

Did you read the original post? Nothing was deleted. It's still there.

This post is here but the post that this original post is referring to was deleted as the original poster of this post says:

This comment made it all the way to #3 and all of the responses under it were people saying "oh yeah wow, this doesn't really seem that bad then". /r/news mods couldn't have that because it was redpilling their users and betraying the fact that basically all of this was made up. They deleted it flat out because it was going against their narrative even though it was literally the most relevant and informative comment a human being could probably have posted on this topic.

This one?

https://np.reddit.com/r/news/comments/5vdodf/milo_yiannopoulos_resigns_from_breitbart_news/de1alez

Exact same comment, per the A B guy. Shows up just fine.

So it seems. So the op was just bullshitting us?

That was my assumption. There's been a lot of retarded shitposting lately. :(

Milo is a fucking pedophile just like the people pushing him into the limelight. He's one of them. What don't you people get about this.

Milo isn't a pedophile. What he said was wrong, and he should face consequences though. I think claiming he is a pedophile though isn't helping the situation, when he isn't one.

Not only that, but what you said has nothing to do with this post. A comment was removed posting the full transcript of Milo's press conference. No opinion at all made on it, literally just the transcript, so it could be discussed. It was removed by /r/news mods for no reason. It's completely stupid.

Have fun defending a degenerate who literally advocated for sex with 13 year olds.

Milo isn't a pedophile.

As far as you know. To be honest, we can't say whether he is or isn't based on the information presented. We can easily and safely conclude that he has no real problem with it based on his admitting to attending parties with pedophilia occurring and him not reporting it.

As far as you know. To be honest, we can't say whether he is or isn't based on the information presented.

Innocent until proven guilty. He himself has said he isn't a pedophile, so unless real evidence comes out suggesting otherwise, I'm going to say he isn't. Just because he said something a year ago, about gay boys finding support in older men, doesn't make him a pedophile. I find what he said to be wrong and very disgusting, but it doesn't make him a pedophile.

We can easily and safely conclude that he has no real problem with it based on his admitting to attending parties with pedophilia occurring and him not reporting it.

What? When has he intended a party where pedophilia occurred and he didn't report on it? If you have proof of that, please post it. If it's true then yeah I would say that's pretty fucking sick, and I wonder if there are laws against doing such a thing? Like I said I'm not defending him but I'm fair at the same time, but with proof I'd easily change my opinion on him protecting pedophiles that's for sure and maybe even himself being a pedophile if the facts add up.

Based on him saying that it's good for older men to guide younger men.

I think him saying this was completely because of his own situation. I think he is in the wrong and should face the consequences but I don't think the statements make him a pedophile.

Innocent until proven guilty.

In a court of law, absolutely. In reality not so. There is an enormous difference between what we as a society decide to do in response to a situation and what the objective reality of it is.

He himself has said he isn't a pedophile, so unless real evidence comes out suggesting otherwise, I'm going to say he isn't. Just because he said something a year ago, about gay boys finding support in older men, doesn't make him a pedophile. I find what he said to be wrong and very disgusting, but it doesn't make him a pedophile.

No it doesn't. Fucking children makes a pedophile, not opinions. These are just clues that point towards him not finding an ethical problem with pedophilia. Excuse me, pederasty.

What? When has he intended a party where pedophilia occurred and he didn't report on it? If you have proof of that, please post it. If it's true then yeah I would say that's pretty fucking sick, and I wonder if there are laws against doing such a thing?

He talked about it on the Joe Rogan experience. Do you want me to link you to it? I'd rather not have to go through the whole thing and find the time but I can tell you the exact quote because I just watched another video that cited it (and I watched the Joe Rogan video where he said it yesterday, so he did say this):

"Y'know, I lived in Hollywood a while ago, briefly, and I went to other people who I won't name of a similar stature in Hollywood [this is in reference to the Xmen director, Bryan Singer, accused of molestation], and I went to their boat parties and their house parties. And some of the things that I've seen have beggared belief. I don't want to be indiscreet about specific people because I think it's going to be- yeah, dangerous. But I can tell you the truth without dropping anybody in it. I mean... some of the boys there were very young. Very young. And when- I don't remember... no no, I don't... 8 years ago? I don't remember whether I ever met Bryan Singer, or if I even knew who he was then, but I knew people of similar stature, as I say, and there were some very young boys around at that time. There was a lot of drugs, and a lot of... a lot of... twinks, taking drugs, and having unsafe sex with older men. And some of these boys were very young."

Before you go interpreting it in defense, if you haven't watched the actual videos, go watch it. And then go watch the Drunk Peasants one. In full. Until then, you're speaking without researching. He's quite clear that he thinks there are exceptions to the rule of appropriate child-adult sex relations, and that he is one of them, sure.

I think him saying this was completely because of his own situation. I think he is in the wrong and should face the consequences but I don't think the statements make him a pedophile.

No, but the fact that he never reported about these (plural) parties he went to to the police, and he refuses to name names... shows that he defends pedophiles. The fact that he praises his own predator and calls him hot shows that he in fact sees nothing wrong- in principle- with pedophilia. He can say that the consent age laws are "about right" but when he follows that up with making exceptions, it's the exact justification that pedophiles do make.

Thing is, he may or may not be a pedophile, as I said.

To be honest, we can't say whether he is or isn't based on the information presented

Again:

We can easily and safely conclude that he has no real problem with it

No it doesn't. Fucking children makes a pedophile, not opinions. These are just clues that point towards him not finding an ethical problem with pedophilia. Excuse me, pederasty.

That's what I said. I said he isn't a pedophile, there is no evidence to him fucking children, or being attracted to children for that matte. His words however were disgusting, and he deserves the consequences. You just repeated what I said.

Before you go interpreting it in defense,

I'm not. I'm not defending anything Milo says or does. I just asked for it because I haven't heard about that yet, was all. Chill ._.

Until then, you're speaking without researching

I'm not defending it, I just asked for links so I can watch it myself was all? Idk why this is an argument.

He's quite clear that he thinks there are exceptions to the rule of appropriate child-adult relations, and that he is one of them, sure.

And I've said in my comments that I think he is wrong and disgusting for saying so.

No, but the fact that he never reported about these (plural) parties he went to to the police, and he refuses to name names... shows that he defends pedophiles

I agree, that's why I was asking for the videos. I was saying what he said in the youtube video doesn't make him a pedophile, just wrong and he should face social consequences for what was said. I didn't even know about what you are talking about till just now.

And to be quite honest with you, I got you mixed up with someone else I was responding to about these issues, and we were talking about double standards in media vs Milo.

Honestly I agree with everything you said.

Yes, we agree. I'm chill, very chill.

That's what I said. I said he isn't a pedophile, there is no evidence to him fucking children, or being attracted to children for that matte.

Yes, I wasn't arguing with you. The very first comment I made was:

As far as you know. To be honest, we can't say whether he is or isn't based on the information presented.

Because he may well be a pedophile. There's no way to know right now. So yes, I repeated what you said and you repeated what I said lol.

And to be quite honest with you, I got you mixed up with someone else I was responding to about these issues, and we were talking about double standards in media vs Milo.

makes sense.

God bless.

What evidence or even speculation gave rose to your opinion that he diddles little kids or even looks at kid porn?

He admits to attending parties where there was pedophilia occurring. Where extremely young boys were getting fucked without condoms. Tell me... how would he know if they were getting fucked without condoms?

This isn't evidence, but you also asked for speculation so here's a train of thought that might make sense.

There's also the fact that he admits to liking it happening to him as a boy, and not only justifying it- but he actually did praise it. He can walk back whatever he said now, but on the JRE and the Amazing Asshole's podcast he was very clear his views.

Source please! I'm willing to look if it's sourced but this was such a set up so I have to keep my eyes wide open on this one.

I think he commented on something he shouldn't have when the age of consent in UK is 16. It makes it a different ball park. They wanted to take him down! The guy was molested himself. Taking down his press conference if it was the problem becomes he was set up then silenced.

I watched him on Joe Rogen pod cast and it seamed like he hinted many times that they will come for him and Joe eventually too. Milo likes to shock people. Like he gets a rise out of it and this 2 years ago BS is weird cause he says some crazy stuff all the time and this is what they bring out? I don't know if I can just buy into it mainly because the "set up" was sloppy and in your face.

Milo just started becoming popular so for those that think he's part of the Elite and a pedo I just can't yet. First they try to shut down the pedo issue but when it doesn't go away they play it to their advantage it seams IMO. I could be wrong but that's what this situation looks like to me.

https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/posts/851263248344905 Share Milo's own words everywhere to combat the shilling. Spread it for the sunlight!

Fight shilling with shilling!

Who cares what bullshit apology he came up with?

The man defended pedastry. That is not OK with me. I will never be OK with a 33 year old man saying that a "sexually mature" 13 year old should have a relationship with an older adult.

His statement translated for everyone:

I fucked up my whole career, oops! I guess it was a joke guys.

His apology is an extension of the classic conservative logic of, "I have a black friend, therefor it's not possible for me to be racist."

Milo says things like, "I'm gay, so it's impossible for me to be a bigot" or "I like to fuck black men, so obviously I'm not racist."

And now he's saying " I was molested as a child, so it's not possible for me to be a pedo-apologist."

I think many people assumed it was Milo doing the molesting, so he probably wanted to clear that up. It seems to me he was a victim when he was young and talked about how he mentally got through it (acceptance). People making him into the bad guy in his situation are the kind who say that women shouldn't wear short skirts if they don't want to be raped.

People making him into the bad guy in his situation are the kind who say that women shouldn't wear short skirts if they don't want to be raped.

I strongly disagree.

I think he is morally and ethically in the wrong for his viewpoints on pedastry, but I do not victim blame.

A more apt comparison would be battered wives who defend their husbands right to physically abuse women. They are a victim, yet still hold unethical views.

People keep saying reddit is garbage and voat is better all the time but they still keep hanging around here.

network effect man. it's hard to move unless everyone moves as well. it's the reason facebook, despite everyone knowing that they have no privacy there, still has a monopoly over social media.

network effect man. it's hard to move unless everyone moves as well

Not only that but these people are assholes, they're the same type to cry about pedophilia and then protect them if they're on "their side".

No one wants to go to a website where every one is a asshole all day long it's the other reason why they keep coming back here and those alternative websites fail hard.

their goal is just to keep convincing people with their disinformation campaign of bullshit. their heroes keep getting exposed to be everything they claim to be against, so they have to double down on their hypocrisy and dig deeper

Speak of the devil.

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

?

It's full of both of you ;)

who am I exactly?

Prior to this election, there was nothing abnormal about people discussing conspiracy theories regarding the president of the united states

oddly enough our very own current president liked to believe many such theories... typically those from alex jones regarding children being fake murdered to take guns away

Are you insinuating there hasn't been more and more connections between trump, his cabinet and russia? Did the Flynn situation not occur?

Why was it you were so quickly linked to that past comment? Surely you didn't scroll through 2 months of comment history....

I have you tagged buddy, that's where the link came from. I have ALL of you tagged ;)

whoa, you tagged me for discussing something big in the news....

you tag everyone who mentions trump and russia? so you have the majority of the site tagged?

you've still yet to point out what's hypocritical about anything i say or how my past comment has anything to do with my comment today

I tag everyone who shows an obvious bias and spreads lies.

what obvious lies were spread?

you have every single user in this sub tagged who has said anything about pizzagate?

Those spreading obvious falsehoods, yes.

you still can't point out an actual falsehood I said?

It is. Shits disturbing.

ALL MSM & SOCIAL MEDIA NEWS = GARBAGE

MSM - Need I say more.

SMN - All tech companies run by people who spent the last 20 years playing video games and watching porn. They are young, rich and want to stay that way. They are worried that child sex traffickers will give child blood traffickers a bad name.

It's showing up in the comment section for me.

Lol, yes this post is bs.

https://np.reddit.com/r/news/comments/5vdodf/milo_yiannopoulos_resigns_from_breitbart_news/de1alez

Comments can be unremoved. Maybe a shit ton of people reported it, automod removed it, moderator approved it.

Yep, seems likely.

No no no, not evil enough. And your using to much of that logic thing. Occam's razor isn't allowed here, it ruins everyone's government fan fiction. (Really a creative writing guide would improve a lot of post in this sub)

I sometimes think I'm on r/writingprompts when I browse this sub

I really do think of it as government Fan fiction. Just with stupidly overpowered opponents and unbelievable luckly/ smart hero's. Its Mary/Gary sues all around. I don't think writing prompts would like these stories very much lol :)

Lol

Comments can be unremoved if there is a backlash

Happens once in awhile when /r/news mods remove a post that goes against the narrative

It appears as [removed] to me.

Yup. It appears that way to me now too. It appears to have been removed, then restored, then removed again.

As someone else pointed out:

Maybe a shit ton of people reported it, automod removed it, moderator approved it.

Or if you wanna believe a more sinister angle, maybe it was removed, then restored to avert drama after OP's threads were created, then removed again (dunno why they'd do the last part though).

Op, the comment hasn't been removed. Or it's been un-removed.

https://np.reddit.com/r/news/comments/5vdodf/milo_yiannopoulos_resigns_from_breitbart_news/de1alez

Well... this website is still terrible! And everyone is still a shill!

Stop patronizing me you shill!

Do be so shilly

Shill Bill Vol. 2

I agree, you should go.

Saw it last night and it was definitely [removed]. Must have been put back in since then. Strange times here on (r)eddit

Gaslighting while still suppressing viewpoints.

I think it's becoming too obvious when they permanently delete comments. Better to just temporarily delete them til it is no longer on front page.

I think you're spot on there. I'm starting to question Reddit's integrity. /s

Starting?

Why was removed in the first place?That's the real question.Why the fuck is Reddit removing then readding comments after being called out on it?

Shady shit going on.Aaron Swartz would be disgusted with how Reddit is these days.

Good lord, enough of this Milo political theatre garbage.

The shills are using this milo thing to try and make us look hypocritical.

They keep saying,

"Oh, so when a democrat is implicated in pedophilia, it's wrong, but if a conservative like Milo is, you guys defend him!"

That's so lame ^.

It appears removed as of right now to me.

OP, reddit is full of shills. You should try voat.

Yeah lets all go there

No, then they win. I think the best strategy is keep participating and assume other readers can tell a shill when they see one.

Im a shill. Can you tell. I can tell OP is a shill too.

you are both too sneaky, i had no idea!

The hate Milo spews is still bad. As a supposed victim he should know better.

Reddit is fucked.

WHO GIVES A FUCK ABOUT MILO! Actual news is happening while everyone is outraged about a professional troll. /conspiracy is not a alt-right, men's right, anti-SJW place.

r/conspiracy is not a alt-right, men's right, anti-SJW meeting place.

look around, my dude.

it has become that, for better or worse.

ikr, we should ignore it and focus on actual news./s

Tell me how Milo is news. God I am starting to dislike people that constantly do nothing but whine about SJW more than I am hating the SJW themselves.

Tell me how Milo is news.

He's a journalist. Tf kind of question is this.

He's a troll.

The mods should take control of this sub, it's as clear as day whats going on here.

He's a troll that appeals to emasculated men who think feminism is the problem to everything and when he gets called out he just goes "But I'm just a little girl." r/wikileaks is at least saner.

That's super fucked up. In that thread of cancer and shit talking that comment actually shed some reality on the situation. Some of the stuff he said in that press release needs to be heard for people who judge so quickly because it's trendy.

/r/news is a joke and always has been. Its a mirror of /r/politics!

/r/conspiracy defending milo. Consider me fucking shocked.

Just goes to show you that the whole pizzagate Scooby-Doo mystery was bullshit partisan politics all along.

Possibly had to do with the fact that the user edited the quote from Milo instead of copying it verbatim.

But then again, who knows?

I don't really think it "goes against their narrative," either, because, well... we all watched the tapes. Pretty undeniable that Milo was defending pedastry.

Watch him on Joe Rogan in 2016 where he says "I wasn't abused as a child or anything like that." and "I was the Predator" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJhHwspZGcg&t=45s

He has no shame about it and is proud of it...and so it's seems very convenient to now just realize he was abused cuz he needs sympathy.

I used to really like Milo but ever since I saw the video where he advocates for pedophilia I'm no longer a fan.

like how much of an asshole do you have to be before people are like "hmmm, maybe this guy is an asshole"

I dont know you, but i am certainly disappointed in you. The signs are clear that this dude is a grade A douche

People don't usually mind assholes as long as they're not the one's being shit upon.

It's why bullies are actually popular in high schools. As long as they don't fuck with the wrong people. It's one of the reason's Trump is popular now.

I have noticed the one group he keeps out of his mouth are jews. Good for them i guess

play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Good job Milo

The comment isn't removed and probably never was. This is a thinly veiled attempt by op to help brigade.

Come on r/conspiracy. Open your eyes

Uh huh. Whatever you say....

It appears as removed to me as of right now.

Let me downvote this nazi then.

I believe they use automod to autoremove comments that have X number of reports. People that know this manipulate automod by massreporting certain comments, therefore triggering a removal.

As a moderator, its also really easy to mindlessly blow throw the modqueue. If that was reported, they might have just thought it was some wall of text spam, and deleting it without bothering to pay close attention to what it is was.

I don't think it was removed to hide anything, and they restored it as soon as they realized it was wrongly removed.

Whole thing was to shut him out of cpac.

Lol

I think you're spot on there. I'm starting to question Reddit's integrity. /s