A couple of those pictures are from the early 90s. Photoshop wasn't a thing back then. It is still fake though. It is just that in 2017 those images don't hold up to modern scrutiny.
Not sure what that comparison has to do with anything. You can take similar photos yourself, here's some amateur photos of Arp273, the 4th image in the OP:
They add the colour to highlight different parts revealed in filters not displayed in the visible spectrum.
"We often use color as a tool, whether it is to enhance an object's detail or to visualize what ordinarily could never be seen by the human eye," NASA officials explain on the agency's Hubble Web site."
When you remember that the 'visible spectrum' is a tiny sliver of what's out there (X-ray, ultraviolet, infrared, microwave, radio, gamma), it makes sense.
At first I thought you were joking but then I saw youre other comment. Seriously? Youre a sheep whos entire personality revolves around worshipping a billionaire narcissist. How is the link he provided disinformation? Did you even read the article? I guarantee you didnt because thats not how people on your wavelength operate. Facts and information are nothing to you. Its all opinions and emotion with you people.
Don't worry man NA$A is one of the most brigaded topics, along with theories about Assange/Snowden being shills and finally Flat Earth is the most ridiculed. These are certainly the paydirt and incidently they are the moat difficult for new truthers to accept. You have to really 'level-up' to see these for what they are. All the DVs here are likely shills.
Incidently did you happen to see the SpaceX rocket land itself the other day lmaooooooo.
25 comments
n/a Putin_loves_cats 2017-02-24
That's because it's all CGI..
n/a MAGASteve 2017-02-24
It's not even good. A 12 year old with a pirated copy of photoshop could do better.
n/a Novusod 2017-02-24
A couple of those pictures are from the early 90s. Photoshop wasn't a thing back then. It is still fake though. It is just that in 2017 those images don't hold up to modern scrutiny.
n/a Rockran 2017-02-24
Astrophotography isn't fake.
n/a Rockran 2017-02-24
This is true.
Computers are used to Generate these Images by taking photos through various filters. Colours are then assigned to highlight various features.
But just because they're CGI doesn't mean they're fake.
n/a Putin_loves_cats 2017-02-24
Your mother says the same about her love for you.
n/a Rockran 2017-02-24
Once again I overestimate you.
n/a whosmav 2017-02-24
No one is forcing you to do shifts here...or are they?
n/a Rockran 2017-02-24
These aren't shifts.
n/a science_positive 2017-02-24
Technically any digitally photographed image is CGI, doesn't make it fake.
n/a Putin_loves_cats 2017-02-24
Crack technically cocaine! Let's pack up. Boys and girls 😂
n/a science_positive 2017-02-24
Not sure what that comparison has to do with anything. You can take similar photos yourself, here's some amateur photos of Arp273, the 4th image in the OP:
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/57124407
n/a bobluvsbananas 2017-02-24
They add the color after the fact to liven them up and put things into perspective
n/a Putin_loves_cats 2017-02-24
lol...
n/a Rockran 2017-02-24
They add the colour to highlight different parts revealed in filters not displayed in the visible spectrum.
"We often use color as a tool, whether it is to enhance an object's detail or to visualize what ordinarily could never be seen by the human eye," NASA officials explain on the agency's Hubble Web site."
It's not just added for shits and giggles.
http://www.space.com/8059-truth-photos-hubble-space-telescope-sees.html
When you remember that the 'visible spectrum' is a tiny sliver of what's out there (X-ray, ultraviolet, infrared, microwave, radio, gamma), it makes sense.
n/a MAGASteve 2017-02-24
Fake news from a fake agency. Trump needs to end Nasa, the fake agency created to mess with the USSR. It's obviously no longer needed.
n/a shmusko01 2017-02-24
K
n/a KashaSendrick 2017-02-24
Just because you don't understand it doesn't make it fake.
n/a SacredCock 2017-02-24
No one said it was fake mate nor did anyone say they can't understand it. you ok?
n/a KashaSendrick 2017-02-24
Are **YOU feeling ok?
n/a Dhylan 2017-02-24
I thought I had seen everything here at reddit but the OP showed me DENSE like I've never seen it here before.
n/a AdalineMaj 2017-02-24
Magnets, how do they work?
n/a chrisplusplus 2017-02-24
L. O. L. If everyone got the reference this would be voted to the top
n/a hoeskioeh 2017-02-24
Hubble images are made, not born.
- NASA
They explain how to read the images, what kind of data is used and why. Very informative.
n/a MAGASteve 2017-02-24
FAKE
n/a James_Alefantis69 2017-02-24
At first I thought you were joking but then I saw youre other comment. Seriously? Youre a sheep whos entire personality revolves around worshipping a billionaire narcissist. How is the link he provided disinformation? Did you even read the article? I guarantee you didnt because thats not how people on your wavelength operate. Facts and information are nothing to you. Its all opinions and emotion with you people.
n/a whosmav 2017-02-24
Don't worry man NA$A is one of the most brigaded topics, along with theories about Assange/Snowden being shills and finally Flat Earth is the most ridiculed. These are certainly the paydirt and incidently they are the moat difficult for new truthers to accept. You have to really 'level-up' to see these for what they are. All the DVs here are likely shills.
Incidently did you happen to see the SpaceX rocket land itself the other day lmaooooooo.
n/a TheKellyConway 2017-02-24
LOL that landing was hilarious, goes up and comes back down. People applaud and think it's all apart of us going to SPACE!!
n/a KashaSendrick 2017-02-24
Are **YOU feeling ok?
n/a MAGASteve 2017-02-24
FAKE