Viruses do not exist
0 2017-03-02 by factsnotfeelings
These are supposedly images of HIV Measles.
Unfortunately, the pictures of ‘viruses’ are indistinguishable from images of cell vesicles.
It is likely that images of normal cell vesicles are being presented as ‘viruses’.
This picture of Hepatitis B is likely a blood agglutinate
Other images of viruses have problems with 3D geometry. The Herpes and Polio viruses are both presented as being spheres.
If this is the case, we should see a variety of widths when they are sliced and viewed under a microscope.
Just as we get a variety of sizes when an orange is sliced.. The pictures presented of Herpes and Polio show circles of uniform size.
This suggests that the viewed images are artifacts of the complex staining procedure involved in electron microscopy, rather than pictures of viruses. Harold Hillman uses the same argument to debunk the existence of cell membranes, in this video.
Conclusion
All of this analysis suggests that the photos of viruses are simply normal cell debris/artifacts which have been presented as otherwise. Assuming of course, that electron micrographs aren’t simply drawings, which they may well be, given the lengths which scientists are willing to go.
31 comments
n/a LSDwizard 2017-03-02
Are you trying to say hepatitis and such doesn't exist?
n/a factsnotfeelings 2017-03-02
the disease may exist, but the virus which supposedly causes it does not.
n/a lavendula13 2017-03-02
Wow! Blew MY mind.
n/a felixlivesagain 2017-03-02
So what in your opinion is the cause of these known transmitable diseases? What's the hypothesis here? What is the vessel that carries an std from one hoste to the next?
n/a factsnotfeelings 2017-03-02
This is a difficult question to answer but I'll give it a go.
I think there may be small animals like lice which transmit disease, but I don't think there are any microscopic organisms (such as viruses and bacteria) which cause sexual diseases.
Chlamydia is a disease that supposedly often has no symptoms (a hallmark of medical fraud).
There is even a testimony here from a woman who tested positive for chlamydia after having no sexual contact for 3 years.
HIV/AIDS is a fraud on many levels, as I discussed further down in the thread but even mainstream sources list the transmission rate by infected partners engaging in unsafe sex at around 1 in 500.
The symptoms of Syphilis, a disease which is considered to be an STD, are the exact same as Lupus. Lupus is not an STD.
n/a felixlivesagain 2017-03-02
Hmm chlamidia is real man it is definitely a sexually transmitted disease and it is true that it does not always have syptoms it does sometimes. Like discomfort and blood in urin. I'm not saying that there is not malpractice and straight up misdiagnosis but there have been times in my life where I was sick and I took antibiotics and it made me not sick any more. Doctors didn't make me sick or anything.
n/a seamlesstransition1 2017-03-02
read this with intrigue down to this comment, granted you do sound off your rocker, but i think you know that. This comment though is where i have to jump in and call BS myself. Explain how someone can have sex, get tested, test negative. Have sex with one other additional person, get tested and now they have Chlamydia.
Just because you personally are not being touched does not mean that other people dont catch things from each other.
n/a 435435435 2017-03-02
What are you thoughts on superbugs?
I find it frightening
n/a factsnotfeelings 2017-03-02
Superbugs are a cover up for medical fraud.
Anytime something goes wrong, they then talk of 'resistant superbugs' as an excuse.
Surgical operations generally have higher death rates than advertised, and the benefits are exaggerated.
In order to cover up deaths/accidents, they blame it on flesh eating bacteria or superbugs.
Conveniently, these bugs can only be found within hospitals, which they also tell you are the cleanest and safest places on earth etc.
It's all massive corruption.
n/a 785239521 2017-03-02
How so? Are you suggesting that when something goes wrong during an operation the death of a patient is blamed on flesh eating bacteria?
Have you seen what these antibiotic resistant bugs can do to a person? Have you ever seen pictures or known somebody that has suffered necrotizing fasciitis?
I don't know if you're just dumb or a troll. Nobody says hospitals are the cleanest places on earth. Hospitals are a hotbed for transmission of bugs and bacteria.
That's what happens when you put several hundred sick people in the same building, despite all efforts to be as clean as possible.
n/a seamlesstransition1 2017-03-02
Polio is myth, boubonic plauge also a myth, std's myth. These are the main points this guy is making.
n/a astralrocker2001 2017-03-02
They may "exist". But at the deepest level are actually Computer Programs.
n/a riyan_gendut 2017-03-02
Well if you think of DNA as data storage or RNA as decryption program then biological viruses and computer viruses are exactly the same in that they illegally modified/overwritten existing data with their own.
n/a DrDarkMD 2017-03-02
So in another comment you state that while diseases may exist, such as hepatitis, the viruses that supposedly transmit them do not.
I would ask what is the point of lying about viruses in that case? One might say for profit? But since Pharma Companies will be treating the disease anyway it makes no difference how the disease is transmitted, whether by virus or other means.
Viruses exist.
n/a factsnotfeelings 2017-03-02
The idea of the virus causing the disease creates the justification for drugs which target the virus.
If disease was seen as being caused by our environment/diet, then the focus would be on natural forms of treatment, not money-spinners like AZT/chemotherapy.
It would also remove the justification for vaccination (if disease was seen as being caused by our environment).
n/a Thekilldevilhill 2017-03-02
I routinely use viruses to transfect human cells in vitro. I also work on exosomes. Exosomes stain for ALIX, tgs101 and cd9, viruses do not. Capturing exosomes using magnetic beads reveales miRNA and cytosolic proteins. Capturing viruses reveals transposon like DNA fragments.
This has nothing to do with viruses. Diseases, regardless of origin, itself give reasons for the development of drugs, not viruses. Drugs do not even target them (viruses), they target the transcription machinery of infected cells. T killer cells do not kill viruses, they kill infected cells. Nothing works as you described in the comments.
Also, most drugs are based on or are "natural" treatments. Naming the active compound does nothing. You can treat yourself to chemo, just go eat some taxus. Want to treat your Bradycardia, digitalis is your friend.
n/a grndzro4645 2017-03-02
This is worse than flat earth theory. At least I get some chuckles out of that one.
The ramifications of ignoring the existence viruses is terrible. Look at what Aids has done to Africa.
n/a factsnotfeelings 2017-03-02
Indeed, but in this case the deaths are being caused by the AZT drugs.
Here is a graph showing that AZT causes cell death.
From this paper.
n/a grndzro4645 2017-03-02
What does that have to do with the Aids epidemic? Yes AZT was not effective and harmed a lot of people in the late 80's&90's.
Are you denying that the Aids virus doesn't kill people? What about warts, colds, flu, hepatitis...etc? Are all the virus researchers in on a grand conspiracy to snowball everyone?
If your theory had any validity we would have had an awful lot of whistleblowers.
n/a factsnotfeelings 2017-03-02
AIDS is an exception in the sense that the disease is completely made up.
The test for AIDS is an antibody test, which is also affected by things like stress, diet etc. It's not a reliable diagnostic test of any sort.
The other disease warts, flu, hepatitis do indeed exist, but they are not contagious and they are not caused by viruses or any other microbes.
n/a grndzro4645 2017-03-02
If it's made up that why is it sexually transmitted? Sorry but you are off your rocker.
n/a VolunteerShill 2017-03-02
this causes too much painful cognitive dissonance for me to actually consider true. It must be worse than flat earth. Let me react emotionally to this
n/a RPmatrix 2017-03-02
OP's usernym doesn''t check out
why are you thinking this madness OP?
without bacteria we'd be dead, our gut flora is essential to our wellbeing
anyway, it's not just virii that can make us sick, lots of microrganisms can
look up macrophages bro and blow your mind
n/a MRH1138 2017-03-02
Good ol' mad conspiracy shit right here folks!!! We say foil hat around here quite a bit but this post gets one in earnest! I still find it refreshing from all the current political bs eating up this sub. Right or wrong... thanks OP!
n/a factsnotfeelings 2017-03-02
no problem, glad you enjoyed it.
n/a shillaryclintone 2017-03-02
Typical incoherent ramblings. No actual facts here.
n/a setecordas 2017-03-02
What analysis is that, exactly?
n/a WheredAllTheNamesGo 2017-03-02
I would say, if you have any basic understanding of microbiology you should read Understanding Viruses, 2nd Edition, but I don't think you do as this is some true herpaderp. Maybe try Prescott's Microbiology, 8th Edition.
n/a Pilotn8 2017-03-02
I usually try to be level headed when reading through some of this conspiracy tripe, but this one is hard. People definitely are entitled to cuckoo cachoo theories but wow!
Please don't breed. Please.
n/a CanadianWildlifeDept 2017-03-02
I feel like it's practically axiomatic that any account with a name like "factsnotfeelings" is going to be full of ideas that, while outlandish on the surface, strongly resemble facts in that they are also composed of words.
n/a factsnotfeelings 2017-03-02
There seems to be a lot of confusion about the Stefan lanka case. His supporters are claiming that it’s a victory since he wasn’t ordered to pay up, but his opponents are also claiming it as a victory...
This is the original transcript of the ruling from the OLG Stuttgart, February 2016.
Paragraph 20 says:
“In addition, the content of the submitted publications did not meet the requirements for the presentation of the evidence. The phenomena presented as measles viruses are actually cellular vesicles.
Paragraph 29 Only a scientific publication in the sense of original work and not a summary could be submitted, claiming that the measles virus exists, which is possible only through the documentation of isolation and biochemical determination of the isolate, and in which the diameter is determined, Which is possible only through "negative staining", which was not done. Furthermore, the determination of the diameter should not have been carried out on the basis of models and drawings, but this was done in the sixth publication
Ultimately paragraph 122 says this:
“As a result, the appeal, in so far as it is admissible, is in any event successful, because the criterion of the claim to prove the existence of the measles virus by "a scientific publication" was not fulfilled by the applicant. Accordingly, the applicant is not subject to any legal costs.”
I may be wrong in my interpretation, but this my impression is that Lanka won.
n/a factsnotfeelings 2017-03-02
Indeed, but in this case the deaths are being caused by the AZT drugs.
Here is a graph showing that AZT causes cell death.
From this paper.
n/a VolunteerShill 2017-03-02
this causes too much painful cognitive dissonance for me to actually consider true. It must be worse than flat earth. Let me react emotionally to this