Multiple submissions here have claimed that Comey has connections to HSBC. If that's true he's most likely in with the deep state. HSBC is the bank that most of the western black market economy uses/used to launder their money. They never were prosecuted even though there was a stack of evidence regarding illegal banking practices.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yeie7j2RSts&t=16s

the guy deserves more subscribers for sure. Consistently level headed perspective, doesn't purport to have the absolute truth, speaks concisely, makes videos regularly. would recommend.

He was a board member of HSBC. He also worked for Lockheed Martin. He made my millions while at both companies all while they've had some very shady things going on.

tbf Board members aren't operational executives who go round doing shady deals for the business.

they just keep track of the company performance on behalf of the shareholders, no?

his position for Lockheed Martin however would have been much more direct / involved.

Multiple submissions here have claimed that Comey has connections to HSBC

Welp, he was on the board of directors for HSBC.....

Can't Trump fire Comey and just appoint a new FBI director?

Nope. He knows where the bodies are buried.

Comey is protecting the deepstate

I think Comey was placed in the following position: If he recommended to prosecute Clinton, the media and the rest of the deep state would go after him. If he recommended not to prosecute, internally the FBI would be in revolt. The case was reopened for time to pacify the FBI. This guaranteed that the Clintonites would turn against him

Dont give him too much credit. He intended to sit on Clinton crime to protect the Establishment. He had an agent mutiny on his hands so he had to buckle on Clinton during the elections. I think Trump mis-interpreted Comey's actions and left him in place.

Comey has the power and responsibility to reopen investigations into 9/11 and Anthrax. The FBI has major roles in both.

But Comey is not merely in a position to reopen investigations. He is in the position of maintaining cover-ups that are ongoing. That includes Penn State, Ray Gricar, and Michael Hastings.

How do you know what he intended?

This is a question you yourself ignore repeatedly. You "feel" his motives over & over:

I think he is up to his own little game

I think he is holding on for dear life and biding his time

I don't think he had the manpower or the proper positioning to combat this level of opposition/corruption

As for that last statement, he indeed has the power to hold a public press conference, which he already has many times. When is he going to reveal FBI involvement in 9/11 and Anthrax?

is waiting for the opportune moment to strike a real devastating blow

Sheer projection with no supporting evidence. I see nothing in Comey but a Neocon who is being given credit by the right-wing the same exact way liberals gave credit to Obama. The exact same phrase, in fact, is being used now that was used in 2008: "Just wait, he's playing 4-D Chess or 12-D Chess."

In 2008, Obama was portrayed as the Good Guy with no supporting evidence but a persona. In 2017, it's exactly the same with Comey. His "backstory" is a CIA legend constructed to make him look like he has integrity.

But Comey's backstory came from the Bush Administration. There's nothing to back Comey's story up but Bush officials.

If Comey had the integrity to announce that FBI played an inside role in 9/11, that would be so explosive that any "more grand conspiracy" would begin to split and unravel.

"We think too small"? No "we" don't. One single precedent of acknowledgement of Deep State involvement in JFK, Watergate, 9/11 or Anthrax starts the ball rolling.

Then why did he help trump win the election?

Because Hillary's criminality threatened the security of it deep state. She knows too much and she could reveal it with repeated gop investigations. Trump knows little of it and true to the CIA pattern, being labeled a conspiracy theorist delegitimizes much of his claims.

I have noticed this. At this point in the game, I have no idea what is going on. He is part of this train wreck, it's just a matter of who is rolling on who, IMO.

I kinda wonder if you feel like someone seems to be on your team sometimes, and not other time, what you are actually seeing is something like objectivity. Or, at the very least someone that is thinking for themselves, and coming to their conclusions more or less outside the influence of a biased agenda.

I don't want to work with someone that always agrees with me. I also don't want to work with someone who never agrees with me.

I think he errs on the side of caution. Trump makes the mistake of injecting himself into the public conversation on literally everything. He gives people a lot of material to interpret however they see fit, and it hurts him more often than it helps. Comey looks like he assesses how exposed he is by getting involved, how much damage does it do him to just let people think what they think, and stays out unless there is some obvious advantage to responding.

i think this def applies to people like Chaffetz. Many Trump supporters are jumping at him for this and that but i think hes just being objective & isn't a Clinton puppet in such instances.

Well he's definitely speaking to plenty of people "off the record" and he's not denying it or showing any signs of being displeased with them putting it on the record for him or using it to serve their own political ends at the very same time.

Trump's got the goods on Obama spying on him and his team so Comey's claim that Trump's accusations are groundless and ought not to be acted on, second hand or not, has tipped his hand in no uncertain terms as far as I'm concerned and Trump has every right to demand his resignation over it and should damn well demand it.

The FBI under Comey is up to it's up to it's neck in deep state subterfuge, false flag and staged terrorist acts in the US and failing to go to the congress and public on important prosecutions that they had more than enough evidence to potentially convict on that the DOJ under Obama has either deliberately stood in the way of or else compromised by giving the actual culprits immunity before the fact. Clearly if Comey had an ounce integrity he would have stood his ground against that. As for all the clearly illegal involvement of the FBI in planning and setting-up undercover terror acts and recruiting and paying whatever low-lifes they could scrounge up to carry them out so they could then turn around and bust them... what more really needs to be said? How can that possibly be construed as enforcing the law or as any way protect to the public against the real thing?

I'm glad some Ody else has noticed this. I feel the same way. I consider myself to be a good judge of character, and something I cannot put my finger on, on Comey. Personally I believe Comey is a soldier, and I love the man. I am rooting for him. I've got a lot of hope put in comey. He certainly marches to the beat of his own drum. He seems deeply conflicted. But he seems like a man of principle .

This.....He's an Irish catholic from New Jersey that's how we roll. ; ) Comey's one of the good guys he's just stuck between a rock and a hard place for now but he's playing the long game like a champ...In my opinion he will be the POTUS one day.

Yes I noticed this exact thing. Investigates Hillary. Doesn't prosecute. Investigates Hillary again. Doesn't prosecute again. Now supposedly backed out of looking into the wiretaps. But no actual quotes from him or FBI on it.

It's hard to tell, if he himself is actually weak and indecisive, or if there is a massive shitstorm brewing all around him, and he is just clinging on for dear life. He has the look of a weak man, but appearances are deceiving. He has worked with the banks and the establishment, but he has also not totally sold out and gone sideways like Clapper.

You don't get to become the director of the FBI as an incompetent though. And even if he is, he obviously knows alot of information. And Trump has shown that he is perfectly willing to fire those who displease him (Sally Yates).

I believe I have great people evaluation skills. I can get a good read on a person from very little exposure very quickly. But Comey is one of those people that I just can't get a good read on. And that truly is the scary scenario. At least with other corrupt people I know where they stand.

For some reason I have a feeling that he is the biggest piece in this puzzle to taking down the corrupt ruling class. He may literally destroy the political establishment or even the country with his action. It's not the type of decisions that one makes lightly. He is probably building such a case that nobody can dispute it. Further, he is likely securing the safety of himself and his family. If he fucks up, shit will be going down for real.

The No Agenda Show had a theory that Comey is actually doing Trump a favor here. The Justice Department can't deny that this 'wiretap' happened because we know that it did. The only question is how legal it was.

This actually doesn't hurt Trump in that case.