Prepare To KNOW The Truth About Guccifer2.0
199 2017-03-11 by d3fi4nt
ODNI/DHS assessments were all bullshit on the subject but they were based on flawed 3rd party assessments.
ThreatConnect made mistakes and incorrect assumptions had them cling to a false-positive 'indicator'. (Seems I was the only person who actually bothered to reach out and communicate with EliteVPN!)
MSM misreported various aspects early on ... if they admit the truth now what little scraps of credibility they have left - may disappear completely.
He WAS a false flag and this IS verifiable.
For any that doubt it... the first step is identifying intent (and that much comes from tvor_22's discovery, so FULL credit to him - it's subtle, very subtle, but it's quite possibly the most important piece of evidence that exists in relation to figuring out who Guccifer2.0 is because it tells exactly WHAT he is by exposing his purpose/intent.)
This can be done using an RTF format specification, understanding how RSIDs work and looking for "styrsid11758497" in 1.doc, 2.doc and 3.doc - and considering the implications. (Basically, the docs were built on the sane blank Russian-language-'tainted' template)
The documents were tainted even before the body content was added!
These were then opened 30+ minutes later using an account with a Russian name and 1.doc, 2.doc, 3.doc and 5.doc were all opened, had content from original documents copied into them and were then saved in sequence over the course of a couple of minutes (writing the Russian name to the metadata in the process).
Now you have the EVIDENCE of INTENT for a false flag operation (2 sweeps of intentional 'tainting'!)
I'll be posting an article in the next 48 hours (hopefully!) that will attempt to walk people through the process of finding and verifying the discovery for themselves (just by being told the documents to inspect, an RSID number to investigate (which is in this article above) - and let them figure out what it means from there)
As far as the MSM is concerned... this is all you need, on it's own, to discredit their 9 month long fake news festival of bullshit on this particular subject. (and it's important to do this on it's own as a separate article without mixing in theories, hypotheses, etc that will ultimately just diminish the raw evidence)
With intent demonstrated... there are a few questions left... but... it's not difficult to figure out the rest... and yes, I will divulge more.. but for now... forget the attribution, focus on raw, isolated and irrefutable evidence that Guccifer2.0 absolutely was an effort to have leaks discredited through attribution to Russian hackers
Every time the MSM insist that Guccifer2.0 is a GRU agent, they're fucking lying.
If they cite the assessments without qualifying that by explaining that the ODNI/DHS theory is discredited - they're fucking lying through omission.
Only when this first, isolated piece of evidence defeats the propaganda - will people be ready for the next stage.
For more info... http://g-2.space
UPDATE: "Minimal-guidance" version is available at: http://g-2.space/falseflag-minimal.html
Guided version is coming soon, it's just going to take a bit longer because of screengrabs, explanations, etc.. and I would prefer everyone who is able to - to use the minimal-guided version anyway.. it's the best way to KNOW the truth rather than have someone tell you what to believe.
61 comments
n/a oneinfinitecreator 2017-03-11
Thanks for this, this is been something I've been watching and I don't feel it has been looked at as closely as people should be looking at it
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
Np... it's time to get this out... doing it in a small abstract step like this is critical though otherwise we get gas-lighting, diversions, etc.
This is why the actual walk-through to checking and verifying will be it's own separate article - and I will be hammering the media with it to let them know... it's time to retire the Guccifer2.0 bullshit or at least inform the pubic of the truth.
n/a H_Dot 2017-03-11
And the deception rolls on...
Top Trump confidante admits to speaking privately with Guccifer 2.0, an alleged Russian cyberspy
n/a AutoModerator 2017-03-11
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
n/a H_Dot 2017-03-11
And the deception rolls on...
Top Trump confidante admits to speaking privately with Guccifer 2.0, an alleged Russian cyberspy
n/a The_Watterboy 2017-03-11
Thank you
n/a mracidglee 2017-03-11
Ok, so, qui bono? The RNC?
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
Clinton campaign. - They needed the leaks (Assange mentioned on 12th) to be discredit.... and from working in Whitehouse, HRC will have been familiar with the person who is named author of the dodgy versions of the documents.
n/a Jan_Dariel 2017-03-11
Sorry but all the article proves is something everyone agrees on. And that is Guciffer 2.0 is a fake front for another org.
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
Another org that had motive to discredit Wikileaks and have leaks blamed on Russian hackers.
n/a Jan_Dariel 2017-03-11
Or the hackers didn't do a good job at first and screwed up. Now people are still trying to cover up the connections they revealed early on.
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
No Warren Flood fucked up and has been caught.
n/a Jan_Dariel 2017-03-11
Then why was there the scramble by Gucifer 2.0 to cover errors that pointed to russian hackers in later releases? Would it not have been better to not try to hide those errors?
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
Further misdirection. It matters not... We can see the documents from his first day were clearly created with the purpose of having them incorrectly attributed to Russia.
n/a Jan_Dariel 2017-03-11
So the misdirection is a misdirection?
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
His masquerade ("I'm a Romanian") was a cover over a masquerade (Russian fingerprints, Russian VPN service, dropping a "Russian" smiley (")))") in his first blog post.. and then never ever again... among other anomalous isolated efforts to appear Russian)
n/a Jan_Dariel 2017-03-11
So what makes your "truth" more true then theirs?
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
I've insisted we stay away from distractions. The RSID and RTF datastream proving the Russians aren't behind Guccifer2.0 is all that matters. - It shows the actual, literal, absolute truth without the need to put quotes about it in a disparaging manner.
n/a Jan_Dariel 2017-03-11
Yes its to not let disinformation spread without solid proof. I am sorry if that runs counter to your goals.
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
I'm showing people where the evidence is.
You're exposing yourself.
This community can decide who they want to listen to.
For now, you're just trying to distract me - so... thanks for playing mind game but I'm not interested in nonsense. The proof needs to be seen by all.
n/a zachij 2017-03-11
Haha man dont waste your time. Just another account who writes 50 comments a day ranging from defending Hilary, Podesta, Colbert, denying 9/11 and pizzagate conspiracies, pushes the Russian narrative, etc etc. Its amusing as they still dont bother to dot in organic comments on other topics besides defending liberal or 'deep state' policy.
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
I've just noticed in the post history the (to put it very politely)... Clinton supporter hallmarks... didn't go back far enough to establish them as intelligence community "cut-out" though. :D
Yes, they will all RESIST this for fucking sure. It breaks the narrative they have clung so hard to for so long... but... not my fault... what I and others have found is just what we have found... and not an effort to seek affirmation of a preconceived notion driven by partisan biases.
n/a CHU_LO 2017-03-11
the shills in this thread are giving me chills
n/a FThumb 2017-03-11
I can hardly wait! Great job on this.
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
Thanks... and thank you for having my back covered in the worse case scenario. I'll always be grateful for that. :)
There's one version up that some of the other WotB mods might be able to storm through now at http://g-2.space/falseflag-minimal.html and the guided version is being worked on now.
n/a mastigia 2017-03-11
I've read another write-up on this. My question is, who wanted to fuck Clinton this bad? Iirc they tracked back to someone at the DNC. Was this a burned berner?
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
You failed completely to recognize WHAT Guccifer2.0 is.
He didn't release anything of any significant impact against Clinton.
His first act was helping Clinton by trying to have the reputation of leaks destroyed and giving Dems an excuse to claim "they're probably doctored" whenever questioned about leaks.
n/a mastigia 2017-03-11
Cut me some slack, been a lot of shit between here and there. I don't really remember the specifics of g2. I thought that it was mostly selling bernie out. What have I forgotten?
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
The http://g-2.space site should cover almost everything you need to know.
n/a mastigia 2017-03-11
It's the volume man. I've read 10s of thousands of pages since then. And guccifers provenance want really interesting to me. The material was. We get sidetracked so hard on who or what leaked this or that, it shits all over the content.
I was leaving work when I saw your post, I'll check it out now that I'm home.
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
That's the thing with Guccifer2 - The content he released was worthless, his behavior was all over the place and the MSM seemed obsessed with promoting his statements and claims from the moment he appeared... but never investigated him thoroughly.
n/a mastigia 2017-03-11
I think I have g1 and g2 mixed up then.
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
I've seen that happen quite a bit. ;)
Guccifer - Marcel Lazăr Lehel - Romanian hacker who hacked emails of lots of high profile individuals, serving 52 months in US and faces 7 years when he return home.
n/a AxsUQueshins 2017-03-11
It's amazing what kind of impression the MSM can give people about a situation. The spin and manipulation is real.
n/a SageeDuzit 2017-03-11
Manufacturing consent.
Scary.
n/a CSharpSauce 2017-03-11
A proper conspiracy theory! How did this make it to the front page?
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
Dunno but I bet it'll be at exactly 50% by the time I come to post the link to the new article. Y'know how it goes on Reddit! ;)
n/a ThatsPopetastic 2017-03-11
Everything related to Trump/Russia is instantly buried on here, unless it's to discredit Trump/Russia conspiracies.
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
Give me the sources/transcripts and if it has direct connection to Guccifer2.0 and isn't included - I'll happily include it.
n/a ThatsPopetastic 2017-03-11
https://out.reddit.com/t3_5yqujs?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Froger-stone-dnc-hacker-guccifer-democratic-party-2017-3&token=AQAAiRPEWNcRebZKGpFGBO9Z4WESxfVAE2oPrzZTEQOwF26UT-tZ&app_name=reddit.com
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
Thank you. :) I've got some screenshots of the DMs too thanks to Tracy D (on youtube) so will be adding this Stone-G2 conversation to the corpus within the next 24 hours.
n/a ThatsPopetastic 2017-03-11
Huh?
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
Watch out for manipulation.
IC-Cutouts, ShareBluers & others won't like this but even suppressing this post won't work, it's a bit too late for that. Cat's already out of the bag. :D
n/a ansultares 2017-03-11
Great work.
I think that report title says it all. What was the purpose? To fabricate a 21st century rendition of Watergate, implicating Hillary's opponent.
ThreatConnect; was that the (still only) firm which "confirmed" it was Russian hackers?
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
To be honest, while I can totally understand why you suspect it may have been preemptive (considering what has happened over the last year and the ties some of these cybersecurity fiirms have to the Atlantic Council, etc) - I'm not sure they'd even thought that far ahead at that time and am confident that the main motivating factor was preventing the leaks Assange had only just announced were coming - from making her lose the primary. - THAT incident got the Clinton campaign in a panic.
I believe even the choice of Russian identity wasn't aimed at warmongering at that point but was based on the recent discovery of malware apparently with Russian origins (would automatically serve to affirm a Russian-hacker narrative) and in the months leading up to this, as we see from leaked emails, the DNC were already hatching plans to associate Trump with Russia. - So Russia was the natural choice just from those two factors.
That said... it is possible they may have been thinking ahead for wars... but I don't think it was the thing that really instigated it... I believe it was desperation to mitigate whatever Wikileaks had on them that motivated it so strongly at that time... nobody else would have had any reason to screw with the public's perception of leaks.
Please note though - that these hypotheses, etc. are secondary to the RTF/RSID evidence. Until the foundation of everyone's bullshit beliefs (for those who believe they know the truth but don't) is smashed by the demonstration of intent through that simple example... it'll be impossible to have them even consider the motive & means.
n/a Haurboss 2017-03-11
Wikileaks retweeted this too.
The entire story of Russian hackers hacking the DNC stinks
Guccifer is a liar. DNC wouldn't let the FBI look at the server. Wikileaks says the leaks didn't come from Russia.
n/a Panda_chic 2017-03-11
Makes sense. Great post, though I don't follow all the technical detail. Looking forward to your follow up. Will get some popcorn so it's handy...
n/a Dorfaladin 2017-03-11
This is the kind of stuff we need on this board. If R/Conspiracy had fifty more of you, this board would be be incredible. Keep up the good work!
n/a _always_lies 2017-03-11
Thank you for keeping up with this.
This is their 'evidence' that Russia was involved, and it's bullshit. I hope this gets the attention it deserves.
Stay safe.
n/a ghettomotels 2017-03-11
All of these "hacks" are expert level psy-op's.
Wikileaks is part of the cabal. You'll know eventually.
n/a SageeDuzit 2017-03-11
oh...I guess that's why they published this leaked video and Chelsea Manning is in jail.
n/a ghettomotels 2017-03-11
Sure, some if was real. It had to be so the public would believe it. Not these days.
n/a Bacore 2017-03-11
Could you explain that in non-tech maybe for the tech illiterate? Who did what to who?
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
I can - but it is separate to the false flag evidence, which is valid on it's own without need for attributions, etc. - But if you're just asking out of curiosity, it was basically...
Clinton Campaign had Warren Flood (Former whitehouse IT manager) cook up the Russian-tainted documents. Guccifer2.0 was an effort to discredit the upcoming leaks that Assange had only just announced were coming.
n/a Bacore 2017-03-11
Now it makes sense. Thanks for the explain.
n/a ventuckyspaz 2017-03-11
I keep tweeting this out in response to the psycho Russia blamers. Thanks for the post.
n/a ta1901 2017-03-11
Since when are RTF files and DOC files the same file format?
n/a d3fi4nt 2017-03-11
The moment you open the file you will see it starts with an RTF stream. "/rtf1"
n/a megatromax 2017-03-11
commenting just to bookmark.
n/a bonobocutie 2017-03-11
Honestly, what hacker willing to release an alias for notoriety and infamy would use the handle of another hacker for anything but implication/association? Genuine attention seekers aren't really that uh... humble? generous?