Proof that InfoWars is..in fact...controlled opposition. They spiked the Awan Brotherhood story, and refuse to talk about it, just like the Main Stream Media.
180 2017-03-20 by 911bodysnatchers322
Alex Jones has no videos on this subject that I can tell -- If I am wrong, prove me wrong by citing the video below. I'll review it, publicly apologize and remove this post. But for now I don't think that will happen, because I've been reviewing Infowars for months and waiting for them to cover this story and to the best of my ability to find it, they HAVE NOT.
- Here is me telling people about Infowars failing to report this story on Twitter
- Here is the Awan story, fully sourced.
- If you want more backstory, here are the cliff notes for the open source investigation run by George Webb
- /r/Truthleaks is a new sub I created to keep track of all the sources for this series, and anything related to it
- Here is Rep. Louie Gohmert addressing the Congress on this very Awan IT Probe issue
- A Website that tracks "Spiked" News stories. Look at the most recent stories. Nearly every single development in the Awan story has been ignored by MSM. AND Infowars.
80 comments
n/a AutoModerator 2017-03-20
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
n/a soyoumadornah 2017-03-20
Eddie Bravo on Infowars recently was telling, they just kept interrupting and laughing at him. Definitely don't trust them at all.
n/a 911bodysnatchers322 2017-03-20
Very very interesting. Do you know which video? This is the guy that co-hosts Joe Rogan right?
n/a soyoumadornah 2017-03-20
Here you go https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ApWTywfTN0
n/a UltraLisp 2017-03-20
Oh my god that clip is hard to watch. Especially the beam coming out of a satellite.
n/a 911bodysnatchers322 2017-03-20
Thanks for finding this :)
n/a dve46 2017-03-20
He isn't a cohost, he just appears on some of his shows
n/a Shill-Police 2017-03-20
n/a ConspiracyScope 2017-03-20
Here's the Full interview: Eddie Bravo on Flat Earth - Infowars - (3-17-17) FULL DELETED INTERVIEW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDEsaF-gnok
n/a 911bodysnatchers322 2017-03-20
That's great man. Thank you. I don't believe in flat earth but I'll listen to it because I like Eddie Bravo and I keep an open mind
n/a Smoothtank 2017-03-20
Eddie Bravo is a moron, though.
n/a KrayzieBoneE99 2017-03-20
I like Eddie bravo. He tends to maybe get a bit overzealous when he starts ranting but he's more woke than most people I think. He can come off as kinda crazy at first glance but I appreciate that. Reminds me of my younger self when I'd get stoned and want to ramble on about conspiracies.
n/a HashtagDadJoke 2017-03-20
Yep. To the point I'm starting to wonder if he is disinfo.
n/a Smoothtank 2017-03-20
He'd be a poor disinfo choice. I can't imagine anyone listening to him. He's just a dopey shithead. But I guess that attracts a certain crowd.
n/a MarlboroMundo 2017-03-20
I mean the theory is easily the most debunked theory out there.
n/a sweetholymosiah 2017-03-20
Why would they censor the Awan brothers story?
If anything, Alex censors climate change and Israeli aggression. Why would they censor a story that negatively impacts the democratic party?
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-03-20
Probably because it's larger than any single party.
n/a wegottagetback 2017-03-20
This is the story that needs to be brought out. This probably ties so many corrupt people together.
n/a libertyant 2017-03-20
not arguing for or against but how would it affect the Republicans badly if they were hacked / had computers tampered with by Operatives who were hired to work for Democrats?
im assuming they wouldn't have been given access to Republican computers and they had their own guys?
n/a PM_ME_FAV_PICS 2017-03-20
Exactly. Another example is Kellyanne Conway at about 53 seconds here shows what looks like a black eye covered in Makeup and the blinking is slower than in other videos.
n/a makeitworktoday 2017-03-20
What does that have to do with the brothers?
n/a PM_ME_FAV_PICS 2017-03-20
Unspoken beatings in DC.
n/a ganooosh 2017-03-20
They're pushing the russia narative in which they have flimsy to no evidence at all.
If you pushed this story in which these guys were caught, fired, and it's all documented, you'd have to talk about it because it's actually a real story.
They prefer the make believe story that can push us to war with russia.
n/a HilterDidNothingBad 2017-03-20
They haven't https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PISEBq1qbo4
n/a bartikus 2017-03-20
OP is being deceitful. Here's Infowars breaking the story back in February: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PISEBq1qbo4
n/a LupinePeregrinans 2017-03-20
Interesting stuff, have subbed to Truthleaks and will keep an eye out.
n/a astralrocker2001 2017-03-20
No one does more for "Beloved Israel" than Alex Jones.
n/a avohec 2017-03-20
You're so full of shit.
n/a avohec 2017-03-20
You're so full of shit.
n/a astralrocker2001 2017-03-20
tell bibi i said hi
n/a ceejthemoonman 2017-03-20
Jonestein will talk about literally any conspiracy under the blue sky - except for reporting on what Israel has done, if it even comes close to painting them in a bad light.
n/a avohec 2017-03-20
Still waiting on proof of your claims.
n/a ceejthemoonman 2017-03-20
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RymaodaYc0E
n/a avohec 2017-03-20
It's sad that I've already seen that exact video. Many times. Heavily edited. You can't lie to people about sources they have studied for years.
n/a HashtagDadJoke 2017-03-20
Here's some good info on Alex Jones:
https://isgp-studies.com/alex-jones-of-infowars-is-cia-army-disinformation
n/a DAY_OF_THEE_ROPE 2017-03-20
Is that the site that discredits every other conspiracy theorist
n/a avohec 2017-03-20
Because a single radio host doesn't cover 100% of everything going on in the world? How about, you get up off your ass, make your own radio show / news network, and cover 100% of everything. And if you don't, I'll be sure to be the first to accuse you of being controlled opposition.
n/a HilterDidNothingBad 2017-03-20
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PISEBq1qbo4
They have covered it.
OP is lying and accusing InfoWars with little to no proof.
n/a Non-equilibrium 2017-03-20
I have never heard of this.
What is your interest in it, op?
n/a senyari 2017-03-20
I confirmed Alex Jones as a shill the first time I saw his videos.
n/a my-other-name 2017-03-20
Because he "didn't talk about something" it is proof that he is something else?!?!
You're trying to connect some dots that are very far apart.
Spend a few minutes and tell me who I should be listening to rather to. Let's here what you recommend.
n/a slainbabyyc 2017-03-20
you sound pretty resistant to the possibility not because it might not be true but because it would inconvenience you
n/a rake16 2017-03-20
No. If you listen to Alex, Dr. Corsi is breaking stories right and left. Whether it was proof Trump was under surveillance or Obama stealing from Fannie and Freddie shareholders.
Just because he hasn't covered the Awan Brothers could simply mean he has tangible information (like whistleblower Dennis Montgomery) and just hasn't gotten information on the Awan Brothers.
n/a 911bodysnatchers322 2017-03-20
Corsi is a legit researcher and he's very good. Keep in mind, some people need exposure so they have to dance with the devil until they get it. Also, they may not know the entanglements Jones or his parent company may have to other supranational groups like john birch society etc
n/a outtanutmeds 2017-03-20
Jeff Rense. They recently tried to murder him.
http://www.renseradio.com/
n/a 911bodysnatchers322 2017-03-20
We should be listening to everyone on every side, including jeff rense, and then reading between the lines of all of them.
It's like here in /r/conspiracy. If you post something 'dangerous' to the establishment, suddenly there's this outbreak of various people debating viciously on both sides
You don't know who these people are
You've never seen them here before
They are new accounts or have low karma or they have reasonable karma but have mostly posted in sports and/or other subs and suddenly they are HERE debating
This is a forum slid
It's street theater
IT's here to absorb the screenheight and drown out any legitimate conversations on the subject as a form of censorship through low signal-to-noise ratio
The same thing happens with video content. They have deep pockets to produce hundreds of HD/4k videos a week, countless hours of content. And how...by selling water filters and bone broth supplements? I don't thinks so
n/a 911bodysnatchers322 2017-03-20
If you have to 'listen' to someone other than yourself then why do you think you have a right to debate on the subject?
These news stories are real, and verified by police reports, congressional reports and now rep louie gohmert's speech to congress.
It's not our fault you feel you have to get your reportage by listening to EITHER CNN or INFOWARS instead of just connecting dots yourself by reading lots of different news outlets, reading between the lines, and then verifying for yourself with real primary source materials like cspan video of congress talking, or statements made by government officials or police reports
n/a my-other-name 2017-03-20
I appreciate you taking the time to write out your response. I agree with your statements about reading between the lines and getting information from multiple places.
However, none of the factual evidence you've provided says anything about Alex Jones.
n/a ThePaperStreetSoapCo 2017-03-20
CIA psy-op
n/a IncredibleMikeL 2017-03-20
Alex Jones is Bill Hicks, perhaps?
n/a ThePaperStreetSoapCo 2017-03-20
I believe Jones was offered a deal, like many others, where he is allowed to maintain a platform to act as the monopolistic voice of conspiracy theorists, so that anything he says becomes the publicly perceived "mainstream" view of conspiracies. It's why we always get the "oh you don't agree with Alex Jones? I thought he was your guys's god!" from the sheep whenever we differ from the conspiracist talking heads.
I wish he were Bill Hicks though.
n/a Hambone_Malone 2017-03-20
I feel the same way man. The way he turned Trump's ball licker has tarnished him in my eyes at least.
n/a 911bodysnatchers322 2017-03-20
He's not. If he were Bill Hicks he'd be funnier, but instead he's mostly boorish with comedy happening by accident. If he tried at funny, he'd be phenomenal because I think Jones is really intelligent and has the ability, he just plays the raving lunatic too much. If he actually made it funnier, infowars could become the libertarian daily show (more than maybe it already is)
n/a ddaniels02 2017-03-20
Are the Awan brothers from Saudi Arabia?
GWebb has us looking at them, but it seems Trump isn't touching them or SA. Which i'd imagine would be similar to Alex Jones, whom also doesn't touch Alefantis and CPP directly.
I figure something is better than nothing, but if there ends up not being heavy swamp draining, then i'm assuming they are controlled or trying to control something.
n/a MarlboroMundo 2017-03-20
Pakistan
n/a ddaniels02 2017-03-20
thank you.
n/a DWRECKINEM 2017-03-20
No ones censoring Awan brothers story. It's just no one takes some fat redneck who points at websites on his computer of proof of his wild claims seriously. And they shouldn't.
n/a delelles 2017-03-20
From what I can tell, there is no social interactivity with the Twitter account @RealAlexJones and @infowars Twitter accounts. They seem to be purely bot account that Tweet out articles.
If you want to alert the reporters there to a story, Tweet at the following reporter accounts:
https://twitter.com/libertytarian https://twitter.com/LeeAnnMcAdoo https://twitter.com/jerome_corsi https://twitter.com/KitDaniels1776 https://twitter.com/MediaRival https://twitter.com/zimm3rmann https://twitter.com/ACTUALLY1ASHLEY https://twitter.com/newsbowne
n/a 911bodysnatchers322 2017-03-20
Wow dude. Thank you. I'm going to use your work here in gathering these twitter accounts right now. Thanks again.
n/a HilterDidNothingBad 2017-03-20
If you contact https://twitter.com/libertytarian, I'm sure he'll link you to the video he's done about this.
n/a HilterDidNothingBad 2017-03-20
https://twitter.com/libertytarian has already covered it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PISEBq1qbo4
n/a BigCatGottaEat 2017-03-20
The Awan brotherhood is what this sub should be really focusing on.
As for Alex I've suspected him of being controlled opposition for a while. He makes conspiracy theorists look bad with his crazier stories and wastes people's time with a bunch of bullshit that doesn't lead anywhere.
n/a satisfyinghump 2017-03-20
I agree they are disinfo. But it confuses me that they MAY be on the shadowban list that Twitter maintains....
n/a 8n0n 2017-03-20
Presuming it is an actual Twitter list, having it leaked and those entries added generates a more believable story of the credibility of Jones' product.
Read this post at own risk and presume this has been modified by Reddit Inc
n/a 911bodysnatchers322 2017-03-20
They can be both disinfo and twitter admins not know it
It's not like they are the borg and have a hive mind, but it's easier for us to fall into that logical trap and think they are. It's more like a multi parent hierarchy plus compartmentalization. They may be on teh same side but not know it and be coaxed into fighting each other, which to the federated parent power structures would be simply puppet theater but to us would appear to be a legit turf war
n/a DAY_OF_THEE_ROPE 2017-03-20
I saw the live youtube broadcast where he was talking about the Awan brothers, for what it's worth. He's was talking about the lack of media coverage.
n/a HilterDidNothingBad 2017-03-20
I saw this too. One of his reporters also has done a video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PISEBq1qbo4
n/a Telenerd 2017-03-20
It's pretty clear Alex Jones is getting fed both real info and fake info.
n/a 911bodysnatchers322 2017-03-20
You'd think he'd be able to figure that out and put the brakes on it. I guess he never expected to have the ear of the president of the us. I still think--if that's true--it's really strange. Strange bedfellows
n/a Telenerd 2017-03-20
Well I watched his Joe Rogan podcast the other day out of interest. I think he's somewhat of a savant, but part of the issue he has is he trusts all or most of the information he recieves that can fit into a pattern he sees. He even said he recieved info from General Flynn and I'm not sure what Flynn's deal is. Why lie? Anyway, people will take advantage of Alex at every opportunity for good and bad so you kind of have to filter what he says yourself.
n/a ghettomotels 2017-03-20
Infowars...controlled opposition? This is new information? lol
n/a HilterDidNothingBad 2017-03-20
I'm searching for the video but I have heard Alex talk about this before.
Your proof is you searching three different times. The people telling you about it on Twitter have the SAME username as you! http://i.imgur.com/erH3uzM.jpg
You've been reviewing them for months, you should have more evidence. Really weak proof to call someone out as controlled opposition.
n/a therustling 2017-03-20
But the demons, joe!
n/a d3rr 2017-03-20
See also: self censoring the David Duke episode. See also: no critical coverage of anything Israel related since 2010. See also: Globalists are the only elites.
n/a CivilianConsumer 2017-03-20
Infowars is against globalism . They've helped expose globalism and wake thousands if not millions of people up to the real enemy, the globalists. They are far far more helpful to us than harmful. I don't care if they don't mention certain groups by race or name, they are in the fight for the right reasons and provide a valuable service.
They're the Fisher Price / Sesame Street of conspiracy theories and I love them for be the ground floor supporting the weight of those who wish to dig deeper.
Not you specifically u/911bodysnatchers322, but it's interesting how there's all these attacks on Infowars today after the recent announcement of "investigations" into them and Roger Stone
n/a mamadore 2017-03-20
Thank you. I'm tired of defending Infowars/Alex Jones. People really think he is controlled opposition- why would he even mention half the things he talks about? They are exposing everything going on, whether you want to believe it or not.
n/a 911bodysnatchers322 2017-03-20
I have this love/hate relationship with them
I feel like they are controlled opposition that will cover things once it becomes so obvious that they can't NOT cover it anymore
It's like with any intelligence agency. Once they have intel that is outed, they fess up to it when it's clear they have lost all ability to deny it, but not until then.
So my point is Infowars plays the same 'plausible deniability' game with the public. They won't cover something very damaging to the establishment until it's obvious that NOT doing so will either make them look irrelevant, or like idiots, or control grid themselves.
So we need to keep putting pressure on them to cover this awan story.
The mods did a great thing today by stickying the Awan story
(Thanks mods)
n/a CivilianConsumer 2017-03-20
It's healthy to not blindly follows faces for sure. I do think Infowars gets an unfair amount of criticism, they have to consider a lot of chess moves that others don't, and I don't think a lot of critics consider that.
n/a CivilianConsumer 2017-03-20
totally, the concern posts about infowars can get tiring. People need to redirect their anger to the very real threat of globalism .
n/a HilterDidNothingBad 2017-03-20
People calling out InfoWars are controlled opposition.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PISEBq1qbo4
InfoWars has covered this. OP is lying.
n/a agentfaux 2017-03-20
You need to learn a little bit about the word "proof" and it's meaning, sir.
n/a HilterDidNothingBad 2017-03-20
Yea because he's completely lying. His proof is searching three times on youtube and a screencap of his own tweets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PISEBq1qbo4
n/a bartikus 2017-03-20
Hmmm. Here's Infowars talking about the Awan Brothers on February 21st: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PISEBq1qbo4
There is no mention of their names in the video description, so searching "Awan Brothers" on the Alex Jones Channel won't return any results.
n/a MarlboroMundo 2017-03-20
Pakistan
n/a 911bodysnatchers322 2017-03-20
You'd think he'd be able to figure that out and put the brakes on it. I guess he never expected to have the ear of the president of the us. I still think--if that's true--it's really strange. Strange bedfellows
n/a HilterDidNothingBad 2017-03-20
Yea because he's completely lying. His proof is searching three times on youtube and a screencap of his own tweets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PISEBq1qbo4