Note: Newton was an occultist. Not maybe, definitely. Also dabbled with alchemy, self harm and the early version of wall street.

15  2017-04-05 by 435435435

Just clearing that up.

Cheers.

Source: the wonderful author bill Bryson

49 comments

Yup. Many (if not, all) of them were connected to the occult/esoteric/majick schools and societies. Things that make you go, hmmmm....

Hang on are you sure you don't have science?

No no ... Just like history

Damn straight...

putey!!! que passa

Cześć!

Tak miło dziś widzieć cię rzadki wypadek

Ditto. It's been a while, how ya' been?

Uczyłam się grać elektryczny bas

Napisałam piosenkę

listening to alex jones reporting on pg .... finally words out [slow but getting there]

Nice, and congrats! What genre of music?

what i do...;0 [hard to categorize] but this of course is fairly basic because i am just learning for a couple of weeks but i like it its deep

you fiddle right?

That's right, and that's how it should be. Create your own genre or just do whatever the hell ya' like :)

you fiddle right

Not very good :/ , lol

yeah but fiddle is sweet becasue you need to use your ear its your "c" know what i mean?

he more than dabbled alchemy was his life

I didn't wanna get too controversial

but truth is truth ;0

Didn't he also spend a large amount of time looking for codes in the bible?

I believe this is also correct

many math equations but his predominent work was alchemy

he is the father of modern chemistry

Occult means hidden. It is not dark or light, just a word that means hidden knowledge.

Occult means hidden, not bad or good. Alchemy is just a metaphor.

Sauce pls

The truth is that science is "Right" but it was made by the people who understood the truth the best.

The truth is that the entire human body is basically a lever system and since we keep eating all the wrong stuff we die super young.

A proper diet is quite different than we think.

I believe it's possible to run off of spiritual currency (Real good deeds done for the universe), the next best is fruit and herbs the gov would describe as drugs.

Real good deeds done for the universe

who defines what is good and what is 'the universe'?

'drugs' are no good, false spirituality. not saying they should be illegal.

Who are you?

Just a face in the crowd.

Just a face in the crowd.

Why would drugs, something supplied by the universe in my context, not aid in understanding ourselves and the world around us better?

because they remove you from your natural state and leave you susceptible to suggestions and infiltration of foreign ideas that pass off as your own.

Drugs are fun, but saying you need them for understanding is a cop-out. You already have everything you need for understanding.

Yeah ok, except when I'm done with humanity everything you just described as logic will be passed off as devil trickery.

Drugs = powerful substances creating thoughts that will create real change on any level.

No drugs = good luck and enjoy fasting/healthy eating and self torture to figure out the truth.

I did enough fasting, healthy eating and self torture to know what the truth was when I got a good sense of myself.

Take magic mushrooms.

lol bottom line drugs allow you to be easily controlled.

So you just want change at any cost. What if that change is limited and you become dependent on a drug for 'truth'

if you can defeat an opponent in terms of his mind then you don't need to waste much energy. drugs get you thinking you are experiencing something spiritual when you are not, keep going back to the drug thinking you are just on the verge but you never get there. you are experiencing something chemical that mimics spiritual but its not the real deal. you've thus been neutralized.

sounds like you are looking for an easy way out. i don't know what kind of truth you are looking for. I was pro-drugs. but after learning about mkultra and how drugs have been used for centuries as mind control i.e Hashshashin or sacrifice rituals of the near east religions, I became much more skeptical.

lol

We as a civilization have not been in our natural state for a long, long time.

i don't disagree.

but when you catch someone robbing you house, do you give them a key to your safe to make it easier on them?

You're asking for a source when you didn't provide one for this post?

I provided a source: the author bill Bryson. From memory 'a short history of everything'

Your definition is wrong. Occult has a more complex definition

I didn't say anything about the occult. Also, that is not how you source information. Stay in high school.

Well I'm not your fucking mother.

I've given you the book as the author what else do you want the page number? Get of your ass and find it yourself.

It's also common knowledge sir Isaac was off his tits. There is a variety of information out there I've given you a head start.

oc•cult (ə-kŭltˈ, ŏkˈŭltˌ)► adj. Of, relating to, or dealing with supernatural influences, agencies, or phenomena. adj. Beyond the realm of human comprehension; inscrutable. adj. Available only to the initiate; secret: occult lore. See Synonyms at mysterious.

it means 'more' than hidden

alchemy is just science before science.

so was Plato. all roads lead to the Kabbalah.

From Wikipedia:

Isaac Newton placed great faith in the concept of an unadulterated, pure, ancient doctrine, which he studied vigorously to aid his understanding of the physical world. Many of Newton's manuscripts—most of which are still unpublished—detail his thorough study of the Corpus Hermeticum, writings said to have been transmitted from ancient times, in which the secrets and techniques of influencing the stars and the forces of nature were revealed.

Shit, that's Sam interesting ...

All about the Might Dollar, morals are bad for business. Hollywood is controlled by satanists. They don't give a damn about the health of the public. Quite the opposite.

Funny you say that

Newton was the first bank of eng boss or something esteemed like that

haha i buy it.

I'm not selling nofin

Look it up it's accurate

Sir Isaac Newton, the new Master of the Mint, hastened on the re-coinage.

http://www.british-history.ac.uk/old-new-london/vol1/pp453-473

Master of the Mint was an important office in the governments of Scotland and England, and later Great Britain, between the 16th and 19th centuries. The Master was the highest officer in the Royal Mint. Until 1699, appointment was usually for life. Its holder occasionally sat in the cabinet. The office was abolished as an independent position in 1870, thereafter being held as a subsidiary office of the Chancellor of the Exchequer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_of_the_Mint

Close enough?

Cheers

The very same people that created the Royal Society that Newton would soon become the head of, had only shortly before created the first Grand Lodge of Freemasonry in London.

Although Newton was never proven to be a Freemason he was clearly involved with a cabal that was connected with some of Freemasonry's upper echelon and all of his appointees to the Royal Society were either masons or else all became masons while they were members of the Royal Society under Newton.

So we have an interesting situation with the beginning of the Royal Society that was supposed to what was and wasn't science and who was or wasn't a scientist and informing the public and keep them abreast of what they considered to be genuine scientific discoveries all being run and managed by individuals who'd all taken a blood oath to keep the secrets of the Universe hidden from anyone that wasn't an initiate or member of the secret brotherhood they all also belonged to. That very same situation, incidentally, was also true about those who established and came to control the Academy in Paris that decided the same scientific issues on the continent. If you really want to know the truth about the Newtonian science and physics that has dominated much of the planet for the past three hundred years I suggest you read and study the works of last great and true genius Gottfried Leibniz, Newton's most formidable critic or read what the remarkable Marie De Chatelet who produced the only official French translation of Newton's Principia that is still used today and what she thought about it and Newton.

And for those with an appetite for a far stranger conspiracy that existed in the midst of all that, I'd highly recommend looking into the life and times of Johan Elias Bessler and the no less than five Perpetual Motion devices he created and displayed that there is more information that actually proves they were authentic than Newton's mere assumptions that according to his model of the Universe no such devices can possibly exist.

Thanks for posting

Ditto. It's been a while, how ya' been?

because they remove you from your natural state and leave you susceptible to suggestions and infiltration of foreign ideas that pass off as your own.

Drugs are fun, but saying you need them for understanding is a cop-out. You already have everything you need for understanding.