The conspiracy of the media is most alarming. President Trump, if you're listening, the same people you called fake news are telling you that polls show your citizens overwhelmingly support you in the war on Syria. Think about that.
119 2017-04-12 by AIsuicide
54 comments
n/a thectheorist 2017-04-12
But he's not listening. He has been initiated into the machine.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-04-12
Maybe. But it appears you have just helped prove my point. Do you support the war in Syria?
n/a thectheorist 2017-04-12
No. And anecdotally I don't know very many people who do.
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
What war? Trump has told Fox he won't be going into Syria. This was a one off missile attack on an air-base which intelligence says was holding the chemicals that killed all those children.
Funny that you're telling us not to trust the MSM, and then immediately believe all their false hype about how we are heading to war in Syria. Where was the hype with the 26,000 bombs Obama dropped in Syria? There was none
n/a AIsuicide 2017-04-12
Who's intelligence is saying that? US? Who says I believe their hype? You? Who were you listening to about Obama's actions in Syria? Me? Are your shoelaces tied? You trip over your own statements.
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
You don't even know that?! Why did you even post this?
You do. You're the one asking every user who comments on this thread if they support the war in Syria
I was listening to the independent self-published journalists writing about the issue, not MSM. Oh, and there's also factual statistics. And don't forget the families of the dead doctors.
Who's really the one tripping?
n/a AIsuicide 2017-04-12
You're great at not answering questions. Who's intelligence agency agrees with the reports put out by TASS? Are you saying the mainstream media narrative is not pushing for further military action in Syria?
You make no sense. You argue that mainstream media covered up Obama's actions, then defend their present narrative. All the while avoiding my questions. Would you like them for them to continue their narrative until we are in a war?
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
Whose*
You're just spewing out the same bullshit statements as usual because your worldview is not based on facts, just opinion, conspiracies and beliefs. Of course I don't make senses to you, I have a feeling not much does.
I answered every single one of your (bad) questions. See where I quoted every single question and added a response? Did grade 4 English class make sense to you?
n/a AIsuicide 2017-04-12
No, you still haven't told me whose intelligence agency stated that the Syrian government bombed a rebel held chemical weapons manufacturing plant.
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
???? I never said that happened. You never even asked that. You're not worth anyone's time
n/a nighthawk1961 2017-04-12
You are only half right. The point that needs to be stressed is not about Syria but about War itself. The American "Neocons" want a World War. Doesn't matter against who...Syria, Iran, Russia, China, North Korea...any will do. Just so long as it's a War. Why? The economy is a hairs width from imploding and they want the public to place the blame on the "War" and not on the Bankers and Politicians.
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
That's just your opinion
n/a nighthawk1961 2017-04-12
Perhaps, but based on a lot of research. Think about it for a moment. The US Military is getting belligerent with North Korea, Russia, Syria and China right now and all at the same time.
Try to think for yourself and not let the MSM think for you. Try not to be a Sheeple.
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
How many times in the past 5 years have NK threatened the world and done nothing? All talk
I don't watch or read any MSM propaganda, and am generally skeptical.
n/a nighthawk1961 2017-04-12
Up until now, yes. North Korea, in and of itself, is irrelevant. The point is that the public is paying attention to this and not to what they should be paying attention to. This is by design. Classic redirect. The public is being played. The question is: What do they not want the public to focus on?
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
Which is? Conspiracy theorists say this for every single event that happens. "Oh it's a distraction!". From what, that over there? "No that's a distraction too".
I'm not sure, but I am sure that when the public finds it you'll be right there calling it a distraction.
n/a nighthawk1961 2017-04-12
Do you pay attention to economic matters at all? Do you know what actually backs the US Dollar (hint: It's not Gold)? Do you know why the "Federal" Reserve Bank hasn't raised interest rates yet despite their promise to do just that? Are you aware that Syria, Russia and China has all dropped support for using the US Dollar? Coincidence then that they are all US Military Targets?
Answer these questions honestly and you will know what lies ahead.
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
Wait, I know this one. The answer is "THE WORLD IS ENDINGGGGGG!!!!"
Or is it just a distraction? 0_o
n/a nighthawk1961 2017-04-12
Despite you clear attempt at sarcasm, you are, however unintentionally, closer to the truth then even you care to admit to. If Syria, Russia and China are "allowed" to abandon the use of the US Dollar for trade then the US economy will tank - writ large. Then every American will know economic pain - including you.
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
Not American
n/a Nutricidal 2017-04-12
You know the BRICS plan. For it to work it needed someone like Hillary Clinton and a destroyed dollar. It didn't work. And now too many other countries (yes,sovereignty is making a comeback) currency is built around the dollars survival. But ya, that was the supposed ending to the 30 year conspiracy. It didn't happen.
n/a YouHaveCancer_ 2017-04-12
Nothing.
The dollar is fiat, like all modern currency and is not backed by any tangible goods. It's value comes from our society giving it value based on faith in the US government. It says this on every dollar in your possession.
They have and more increases are planned this year.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/mar/15/us-federal-reserve-raises-interest-rates-to-1
What does this even mean? If they want to buy US goods they pay US dollars, if the US wants to buy Chinese goods it pays in yuan.
How much research did you say you've done on this?
n/a AIsuicide 2017-04-12
Show us your sources for the claim that China and US are working together on North Korea's borders.
n/a iliketobuildstuff74 2017-04-12
You guys are kinda both right at the moment. Nothing has actually happened yet (aside from an airstrike)...
I think Trump will just flex his muscles in front of everybody, then make deals... He want people to think he would do it, but doesn't really want to. If anything, he will do one, two or a couple more strategically targeted airstrikes on bad hombres around the world, but I don't think we are going to go to war with anyone unless there is an agregious, unprovoked attack by some non NATO country.
"Speak deals and carry a big stick"
n/a ansultares 2017-04-12
I said weeks ago that the Trump Doctrine will be much bark, with little bite.
If I recall, I was downvoted.
n/a ansultares 2017-04-12
That seems highly unlikely. Even the Amish are probably exposed to a periodic stream of MSM talking points.
n/a buddiebud 2017-04-12
The war in Syria is about [Leviathan oil field (https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/64efor/why_did_obama_back_down/dg1ie0e/)
n/a thegoodmourning 2017-04-12
Well you don't technically need to go into Syria to disrupt the nation, overthrow their leader and get in on an oil pipeline deal for Exxon. You just need to send someone else to do it. Someone else we have full control over.. like ISIS
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
If that's what you believe
n/a Nutricidal 2017-04-12
There's no other alternative theory. It's probably israel, but Americans are subjugated and not allowed to speak of such things. Only in the darkest bowels of the internet can we whisper such possibilities. Think about it.
n/a Sabremesh 2017-04-12
Obama was ostensibly bombing ISIS, and never "officially" bombed Syrian government targets. Trump has waded in with the first publicly declared deliberate bombing of Syrian state infrastructure since the start of the war in 2011. Big difference. Huge.
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
Yes, very huge. So much worse than bombing a civilian hospital
n/a Rosssauced 2017-04-12
Fun thing about that is that since the pentagon pretty much told transparency to shove it we wouldn't even be informed by regular outlets if we were in Syria. It will get leaked soon though.
n/a nighthawk1961 2017-04-12
Wrong. Quite the contrary. He is listening. It is what he is being told that is the difference here. Trump isn't deciding anything. He is only explaining things to the public.
n/a Goatmasterson 2017-04-12
Yeah, they're all easily manipulated and spew the common accepted narrative.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-04-12
How many people do you personally know, that support a war in Syria?
n/a krazeesheet 2017-04-12
1. My room mate. Fortunately, I will not be around here much longer, allowing him to feed off of my energy.
n/a vitisrotundifolia 2017-04-12
Zero
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
I hate to defend the MSM here, but if the MSM lies once, are they always lying?
n/a AIsuicide 2017-04-12
Can we agree they are operating on an assumption that has not been investigated, much less proven?
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
Just like everyone else who believes it was a false flag? Except those people have even less evidence
n/a AIsuicide 2017-04-12
Run around your mulberry bush all you want. You gave yet to put together a coherent sentence when answering my questions. Have a nice night.
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
Quick, your world view based on conspiracy and opinion is being crushed! Get out while you still can!
n/a AIsuicide 2017-04-12
All you've given...in every single comment in this entire thread is your opinion.
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
And?
n/a AIsuicide 2017-04-12
Whose intelligence agency stated that the Syrian government bombed a rebel held chemical weapons manufacturing plant?
n/a anonymity_ftw 2017-04-12
The MSM is a business based on illusion...so the answer to your question is yes.
n/a RedPillFiend 2017-04-12
Nearly every MSM outlet is owned by one of 5 corporations. There is no freedom of press. They push whatever agenda their corporate owners tell them to. So yes, they're always lying, spinning, and pushing stories and narratives to try to influence public opinion.
n/a emperorisnaked7 2017-04-12
OMG I just about fell out of my chair reading this. As if he gives a fuck! Holy shit. OP must be so sad to see the person he voted for shit on him.
n/a AIsuicide 2017-04-12
Very constructive comment. I take it you're signed up to the divided we will conquer logic.
n/a emperorisnaked7 2017-04-12
Apparently you have no logic at all. I just called OP out on some bullshit and you are trying to do... What exactly?
n/a AIsuicide 2017-04-12
Who exactly is the OP?
n/a AIsuicide 2017-04-12
And now you make a post about fake poll manufacturing consent for war in Syria? Nice
n/a Badgereatingyourface 2017-04-12
Trump is an asshole. How did you guys convince yourselves he wasn't?
n/a Kricketier 2017-04-12
I don't think anyone really thinks Trump is not an asshole. At least around this sub, most Trump supporters either chose him as the lesser of two evils or belong to the camp that thinks Trump can't be bought.
n/a 6Dollarcoffee 2017-04-12
This isn't the_dumbfuck
n/a whacko_jacko 2017-04-12
Watch carefully what happens when it becomes clear that the situation in Syria is not going to escalate. The media will flip on Trump just as fast as they flipped to praising him following the strike.
n/a JournalismIsDead 2017-04-12
That's just your opinion
n/a buddiebud 2017-04-12
The war in Syria is about [Leviathan oil field (https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/64efor/why_did_obama_back_down/dg1ie0e/)
n/a AIsuicide 2017-04-12
Very constructive comment. I take it you're signed up to the divided we will conquer logic.