Boris Johnson just called for "decapitation" of Assad...When did it become acceptable for US/UK politicians to openly call for the assassination of other countries leaders (or for the overthrow of their government)?

176  2017-04-19 by [deleted]

[deleted]

45 comments

Since Winston Churchill. So many Assad fanboys. You must not be American.

Since Winston Churchill. So many Assad fanboys. You must not be American

Go look at all the other countries that replaced the democratically elected leader and see where they are now, overtaken by Isis, growing Opium for the Alphabets/Big Pharma, or selling slaves in Libya:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/10/libya-public-slave-auctions-un-migration

"WMD's" was a lie for M.I.C. just like chemical attacks in Syria are a false flag as well. Attacking Syria is a Globalist/Zionist Bankster hostile takeover because they are not debt slaves to the IMF/Central Banks.

Wake the Fuck up:

http://i.imgur.com/0yhUbGb.jpg

https://i.redd.it/7wwrca4dp4qy.jpg

Serious question, what's Alphabets?

NSA, CIA... you know, letters.

Thank you

Always a pleasure.

cia, fbi, nsa, and so on

Libya replaced their democratically elected leader? Egypt, Syria, Iraq, none of them had democratically elected leaders. The countries that had terrible governments still have terrible governments.

If you think that ISIS are all agents of the US government, you can't stop the problem.

Libya replaced their democratically elected leader? Egypt, Syria, Iraq, none of them had democratically elected leaders. The countries that had terrible governments still have terrible governments.

Countries with Islam as their predominant culture require a hard lined leader to keep them all in check. You should do some research on how Gaddafi provided education, universal basic income, and various programs to his people, that place was for the most part doing really good under him, until he started talking about an African Union with its own Gold backed currency, then shit went down hill and deepstate killed him off

Meh, even an Islamic country with a benevolent dictator will still be in some deep shit. I think we agree that the Obama-Clinton regime change in Libya was a failure and made things worse. But Turkey and Tunisia will be interesting tests of your theory. Will Tunisia be better off as a democracy? Will Turkey be better off as a dictatorship?

I say yes and no, respectively. What is your prediction?

Tunisia will get raped by corporations for any oil, land, resources, assets just like is starting to happen in Cuba after Castro died and his brother opened access to the West.

Turkey is fucked under Erdogan who is turning it into a radicalized Islamic dictatorship that threatens EU to allow them into EU and their citizens access or else he will flood them with Turks/Immigrants. He's a loose cannon who is ruining Turkey day by day

Let's hope Cuba will stay the glorious socialist paradise it it :) So you agree Turkey is better off as a democracy?

Cuba a socialist paradise? lol ...you should hear some of the horror stories. I actually almost married a cuban girl a dated for a few years and her Dad used to talk about the 'camps' and how gays would get beat in the streets, food rationing, limited resources, bribes, bureaucracy, empty grocery store shelves and many other details.....enough to have people risk shark invested waters to come to Florida

So you agree Turkey is better off as a democracy?

Temporarily, sure. It allowed them to be secularized, get Nukes, and get taken seriously on the world stage...unfortunately all it takes is one psycho like Erdogan to start reversing all of that and entering into some fascist radicalized makeshift pseudo tyranny.

Makes sense though If history repeats itself then it means that the Turks will rise again as Ottoman Empire 2.0 lead by radical Jihadists who try to invade Europe again, just like Syrian Muslims and a ton of middle East and African Muslims are doing under the guise of refugees

History doesn't repeat itself.

of course it does, both on the level of micro and macro. Individuals often repeat the same cycles their parents did (epigenetics) and political systems repeat the same life spans/cycles as their predecessors, wars, corruption, take overs, invasions, its all the same shit different day being repeated constantly

You don't friends who got killed or fucked up in any of these wars? You must not be american either.

He's widely regarded as a buffoon.

Perhaps Assad can take comfort in this statement?

Former mayor of London and most likely future leader of the torys, write him off at your peril but he's no buffoon he knows what he's doing which makes it all the scarier.

most likely future leader of the torys

Ah, bullshit, after he fucked up the Brexit vote he became poison.

I wouldn't count on it but let's see what happens

Him being widely regarded as a buffoon, but actually being a master manipulator is quite concerning.

He doesn't mean literally decapitate him, it's figurative.

He is saying Assad is the head of the "monster" that is the Syrian state, and needs removing.

Right. Calling for the decapitation of something is too specific to be taken in any other context here.

It clearly refers to taking the figurative head off of an entity, in this case by stifling Assad's power.

Because it's home to the City which truly rules the kings of the world and they bow down to The Whore of Babylon who sits on the throne.

Book of Revelations. Read it. And may God Damn The Queen.

Well precedent was set a long time ago. But we should demand it be stopped.

Look at what Hillary said about killing Gaddafi.

Ugh. Everytime I see that video, read that quote, or even think of her cackling about what happened to him, I want to punch something.

Which vid is that?

The one where he gets tortured and raped by soldiers

Fucking hell ok

They use a knife in his bungholio

He what now?

Boris is a fucking clown.

Its highly unlikely that he meant decapitate as in chop of his head,he is most likely using colourful langue. He does this sometimes. He uses a lot of complex oddly constructed sentences to convey simple notions. Some would say this is to disguise the fact that he's an idiot.

"Beware of foreign entanglements." - Said someone smarter than these people.

This guy is a knee-jerk buffoon riding MSM and NWO bullshit.

I would like to hear from Assad and the first lady of Syria, before accepting condemnation by third parties. Did they really launch chemical weapons onto their own citizens? It make no sense. Who would benefit from such an action. Or is it a tale?

I just don't know what to think sometimes about Assad.

On one hand I know the propaganda

On the other I've seen comments from Syrian people claiming Assad is their only hope for a secular life.

Truth is Obama wasn't allowed to intervene in Syria. Evidenced by the current president raging at him on twitter in 2013. To defeat ISIS we need to intervene, now I'm liberal but I would be absolutely brutal after I launched a massive propaganda campaign against ISIS followers.

I remember Obama's red line. I even learned about it from Fox news because I only follow right wing news nowadays. I remember the comments from people bitching about how weak he was. He was never even allowed to go in and defeat ISIS.

As for this particular politician I don't know anything about him but the praised heaped on him for being right wing. But it seems like it's his opinion and he should be allowed to have it.

We had a senator in the U.S who said, "We can't restore our civilization with someone else's babies." Effectively turning me away from the right wing forever because he was talking about half white breeds like me.

Can anyone confirm for me that this was said literally and not metaphorically?

So long as it advances Israel's agenda in the Middle East, anything is acceptable.

Here in France we had a Ministry of Foreign Affairs that told to the TV that Bashar "dont deserve to be on earth"... so...

https://youtu.be/s4GZ1Tf3Nf0?t=22

When it became acceptable for a US President to kill American citizens without trial

UK ran out of money in the 70s and Saudi Arabia bought up yheir government. Johnson works for them. Not a joke.

Is there any question of who the actual terrorists of this world are? These past few years have been very revealing on what is actually going on in the Middle East.

ISIS is a fake enemy that is doing the dirty work for Israel, Saudi Arabia and the US gov't. The MSM narrative plays out that ISIS is bad, but not reported that they are good for the Zionist agenda in the Middle East. The MSM narrative plays out that the US is fighting against ISIS...which is fake news because the US IS NOT fighting ISIS at all. In fact, Israel, the Saudis and the US are all supporting, funding and logistically commanding ISIS all the while the MSM tells us that we are there fighting them. We couldn't have the world thinking it was really the western powers that are the actual terrorists now could we??

But, that fake story all went to hell when the Russians went over there and actually bombed the shit out of ISIS...and the US gov't got really, really mad. Why? Well, AIPAC for one. The Truth that ISIS is really a proxy for the western terrorists the zionist for another. Russia has been getting demonized within the MSM narrative ever since.

Its better the leaders that start the wars kill eachother than others who are forced to follow.

I deleted this post due to an error on my part--the title was misleading and I have re-posted with a more factually accurate title. The original post should have clarified that Boris Johnson LIKENED Assad to a "monster" and mentioned the "decapitation" of his regime.

Cuba a socialist paradise? lol ...you should hear some of the horror stories. I actually almost married a cuban girl a dated for a few years and her Dad used to talk about the 'camps' and how gays would get beat in the streets, food rationing, limited resources, bribes, bureaucracy, empty grocery store shelves and many other details.....enough to have people risk shark invested waters to come to Florida

So you agree Turkey is better off as a democracy?

Temporarily, sure. It allowed them to be secularized, get Nukes, and get taken seriously on the world stage...unfortunately all it takes is one psycho like Erdogan to start reversing all of that and entering into some fascist radicalized makeshift pseudo tyranny.

Makes sense though If history repeats itself then it means that the Turks will rise again as Ottoman Empire 2.0 lead by radical Jihadists who try to invade Europe again, just like Syrian Muslims and a ton of middle East and African Muslims are doing under the guise of refugees