Because this is a fucking conspiracy sub, what do you expect?
Seth Rich is about as juicy as conspiracies get currently. There is more evidence to suggest it was a planned assassination than to suggest is was a botched robbery.
Also Podesta emails making "an example of a leaker" is very suspect.
Also Podesta emails making "an example of a leaker" is very suspect.
Well if you knew all the Podesta emails except the ones that gave you a pedophile boner... I'm under the impression Tulsi Gabbard was the DNC leak or helped it in some way and then they told her she won't be getting PAC money for supporting Bernie and dropping out as DNC vice chair.
Which is why she is currently saying she won't be taking money, because she can't get it anyway.
Also... it's only juicy if you're a bernie bro or trump supporter (For some odd reason).
So seriously, "there's more evidence it was a planned assassination" is evidence of how delusional you all are.
First of all I'm neither a Bernie supporter or a Trump supporter, I don't understand where you get that assumption. Being interested in the death of Rich doesn't mean you are partisan. Justice isn't partisan.
Secondly, what evidence and Podesta emails do you have to suggest Gabbard was the DNC leak? I'm very privy to the Podesta leaks, there is more corruption to them than just a few pizza emails.
Finally, what about the holes in the police report?
What about the police cams, it's been months.
What about the bar owner who went to the white house before Seth was murdered?
What about the fact he was killed in a precise place in DC, completely avoiding traffic cams?
These are all questions yet to be answered, and until then justice will need to be served through citizen investigations.
Lots of what abouts that a thousand people would want for their unsolved murders from random acts of violence. You act like this country isn't packed full of guns.
Those are questions, morons are asking, TBQH.
You still haven't even discussed my points of how he even got access. Before we jump to how this assassination was carried out you think you people would have a little fucking critical thinking and first want to know proof if he was even the leaker in the first place.
Rich worked directly for the DNC. He also worked as a Expansion Data Director, so he obviously knew his was around a computer, and collectiong information. It's not unreasonable to believe he also undersood how to use certain scripts or hacking tools to access emails behind a protected server.
Is that seriously all you got? Pathetic. Absolutely pathetic.
You know you've done nothing to refute my points but attack me right? Right? Of course you don't know. Go find the truth in a twitter account, if you can.
Mate I haven't attacked you, I'm not that way inclined I'm letting you know why youve been downvoted here. If you don't like that that's your problem. Were all adults. I'm not refuting Any point you've made I'm saying there's no evidence for your point, dude you could be right who knows. Give evidence. Then like adults we can discuss it. I could sit here arguing all night the Sky's red it wouldn't get me fucking anywhere would it unless I backed it up.
We people as you like to call us. Are not here to prove he was definitely the leaker. We could prove he wasn't the leaker and it was someone else that's the whole point of this sub to prove or debunk a theory. That's what a conspiracy is, were not here to divulge in real aliens or who shot JFK we are here to focus on the evidence and uncover the truth of it whether its true or false.
Russia this and Russia that, roll out of the the wrong side of bed blame Russia. Where are your from if you don't mind me asking. Because i find the Russian nation quite easy going. Didn't a man in a article on Russia start all this shit and its carried on since? The guy actually admitted he lied and made it up. You're falling for a msm narrative pal and I feel sorry for you.
Free think, or if you're being paid this sub not have it pal.
Traitor, my friend im from england, UK. I'm not treacherous to anything. I do not own or need to have American values. I'll leave it at that enjoy your day. Peace out.
Get used to it, this isn't going away until we solve his murder, and anyone trying to obstruct that may face consequences.
You, for example, have devoted your entire existence on reddit to trying to talk down this story down despite the fact that it's an unsolved murder. Every moral, sane human being should want to see justice served to his killers, so what's your M.O.?
It's so creepy. They are stalking his old accounts. You'd think a fucking planned assassination would have thought about scrubbing his internet accounts.
Boy are these people gonna be pissed when they learn about Bernie's wife's bank fraud investigation. Or the houses he bought with that money while campaigning on anti-capitalist corruption.
They act like they are doing "good" for Seth Rich, but not once have any of them considered the potential pain they are causing his family and friends. The whole thing is despicable.
I've tried to say my points in other posts but there's so many of them.
I know people give the excuse that this is a conspiracy but until we got at least knowledge he was the leaker without KIMDOTCOM, I don't think it is a conspiracy. I'll fully entertain this if we knew Seth was the leaker. Because it seems much more likely it was a random act of violence and wikileaks got the emails through paid hackers.
Kim DotCom made a string of claims during the election that never amounted to anything. Ask yourself why he would suddenly claim it's true and he has proof now, now that the theory has been resurrected by a FULLY DEBUNKED Fox News-related episode.
The idea that Seth was the leak to WL has not been debunked, but the whole Monday drama has been, admittedly, by the same guy making that claim.
Kimdotcom is desperate for relevance, and simply promoting the theory.
That's because they are using the Seth Rich story the same way they used Pizzagate. This is a honey pot created to discredit this community. "Look at these evil conspiracy theorists invoking the name of this slain individual to support their agenda! We need to do something to stop this sort of thing!" And people take the bait every time this happens.
I think they had to because there is a full blown leftist conspiracy theory that got a special counsel and everything. I wish I knew a place I could read more about it. It's almost like information is being suppressed. Anyway.
There is a suspicious core to his death that affords pretty unstandable skepticism. However, the promotion of only one acceptable, very simplified theory leads me to believe the real effort here is to just spread the theory around, get as many people to believe it as possible, create reasonable doubt re: the Russian hack concept-- thus, it feels all the world like coordinated, seeded propaganda, like Pizzagate, Spirit Cooking, and in a way like Trump/Russia (although many, many people with their credibility on the line are involved in very real investigations there, which doesn't mean it's true, but is being taken vastly more seriously as a possibility).
Fully with you that proving Seth was the DNC leaker would open the door in a major way. So far, just claims.
And as I've said before: this has never felt like an effort to find out who killed Seth, more an effort to prove the DNC did it and exonerate all accusations against Putin's regime. Nobody's researching gang activity in DC, linking to the crime waves in and around his neighborhood, or considering any other tract besides the extremely political "Clinton Kill List" one.
28 comments
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
Less than one minute, downvoted.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
Comment downvoted, 20% upvote rating at 4 minutes.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
At ten minutes we have 14% upvote rating.
This going to be the first Seth Rich post not to make it to the front.
n/a keag4n 2017-05-20
Because this is a fucking conspiracy sub, what do you expect?
Seth Rich is about as juicy as conspiracies get currently. There is more evidence to suggest it was a planned assassination than to suggest is was a botched robbery.
Also Podesta emails making "an example of a leaker" is very suspect.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
Well if you knew all the Podesta emails except the ones that gave you a pedophile boner... I'm under the impression Tulsi Gabbard was the DNC leak or helped it in some way and then they told her she won't be getting PAC money for supporting Bernie and dropping out as DNC vice chair.
Which is why she is currently saying she won't be taking money, because she can't get it anyway.
Also... it's only juicy if you're a bernie bro or trump supporter (For some odd reason).
So seriously, "there's more evidence it was a planned assassination" is evidence of how delusional you all are.
n/a keag4n 2017-05-20
First of all I'm neither a Bernie supporter or a Trump supporter, I don't understand where you get that assumption. Being interested in the death of Rich doesn't mean you are partisan. Justice isn't partisan.
Secondly, what evidence and Podesta emails do you have to suggest Gabbard was the DNC leak? I'm very privy to the Podesta leaks, there is more corruption to them than just a few pizza emails.
Finally, what about the holes in the police report?
What about the police cams, it's been months.
What about the bar owner who went to the white house before Seth was murdered?
What about the fact he was killed in a precise place in DC, completely avoiding traffic cams?
These are all questions yet to be answered, and until then justice will need to be served through citizen investigations.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
Lots of what abouts that a thousand people would want for their unsolved murders from random acts of violence. You act like this country isn't packed full of guns.
Those are questions, morons are asking, TBQH.
You still haven't even discussed my points of how he even got access. Before we jump to how this assassination was carried out you think you people would have a little fucking critical thinking and first want to know proof if he was even the leaker in the first place.
n/a keag4n 2017-05-20
Rich worked directly for the DNC. He also worked as a Expansion Data Director, so he obviously knew his was around a computer, and collectiong information. It's not unreasonable to believe he also undersood how to use certain scripts or hacking tools to access emails behind a protected server.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
Expansion Data Director = HACKERMAN
n/a keag4n 2017-05-20
If thats's your response to critical thinking, I think I'll just let that statement speak for itself.
n/a MollyNostrils23 2017-05-20
I'm British and I although I think Bernie was alright I don't 'support' either - It's just that this is indeed as juicy as conspiracies get.
n/a PickUpTheBass 2017-05-20
Are you serious man? Let me get my violin out for you. You've just wrote a complete load of shit without backing any of it up.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
You mad you don't have proof?
n/a PickUpTheBass 2017-05-20
I'm not claming i have and I certainly wouldn't make a post with none and then fucking moan for getting downvoted. How old are you 10. Get a grip man.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
Is that seriously all you got? Pathetic. Absolutely pathetic.
You know you've done nothing to refute my points but attack me right? Right? Of course you don't know. Go find the truth in a twitter account, if you can.
n/a PickUpTheBass 2017-05-20
Mate I haven't attacked you, I'm not that way inclined I'm letting you know why youve been downvoted here. If you don't like that that's your problem. Were all adults. I'm not refuting Any point you've made I'm saying there's no evidence for your point, dude you could be right who knows. Give evidence. Then like adults we can discuss it. I could sit here arguing all night the Sky's red it wouldn't get me fucking anywhere would it unless I backed it up.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
I don't need evidence. Read the post, it's all logic.
You people are the ones who need to prove that
A) He was the leaker
That's it. Only that. Then it seems plausible he was killed by the DNC. That easy.
n/a PickUpTheBass 2017-05-20
We people as you like to call us. Are not here to prove he was definitely the leaker. We could prove he wasn't the leaker and it was someone else that's the whole point of this sub to prove or debunk a theory. That's what a conspiracy is, were not here to divulge in real aliens or who shot JFK we are here to focus on the evidence and uncover the truth of it whether its true or false.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
Wow.
n/a PickUpTheBass 2017-05-20
Look at the evidence for and yours against.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
I have. Seems more plausible he was a victim of random violence and hackers paid by russia broke into the DNC.
n/a PickUpTheBass 2017-05-20
Russia this and Russia that, roll out of the the wrong side of bed blame Russia. Where are your from if you don't mind me asking. Because i find the Russian nation quite easy going. Didn't a man in a article on Russia start all this shit and its carried on since? The guy actually admitted he lied and made it up. You're falling for a msm narrative pal and I feel sorry for you. Free think, or if you're being paid this sub not have it pal.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
Just because you're a traitor that doesn't have American values. Doesn't mean I have to be.
n/a PickUpTheBass 2017-05-20
Traitor, my friend im from england, UK. I'm not treacherous to anything. I do not own or need to have American values. I'll leave it at that enjoy your day. Peace out.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
32 minutes, 13% upvote rating.
This is a comey memo. Just documenting and experimenting with how this sub operates on facts.
n/a MollyNostrils23 2017-05-20
You're a Comey memo.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
Thanks. I do strive to tell the truth with the information I've been given.
n/a aleister 2017-05-20
Yup, zero. I recommend you visit one of the 50 Seth Rich posts to make your point in contrast to making another one.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
Already have. Even more Seth Rich posts hit the front, new, contro anywhere you name it.
n/a Ras-Al-Ghoul 2017-05-20
Get used to it, this isn't going away until we solve his murder, and anyone trying to obstruct that may face consequences.
You, for example, have devoted your entire existence on reddit to trying to talk down this story down despite the fact that it's an unsolved murder. Every moral, sane human being should want to see justice served to his killers, so what's your M.O.?
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
lol this guy
n/a irwin_normal 2017-05-20
I think a lot of people really like that one...
Gonna be tough to convince people otherwise.
Like persuading a zealot that their idol is fictitious...
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
It's so creepy. They are stalking his old accounts. You'd think a fucking planned assassination would have thought about scrubbing his internet accounts.
Boy are these people gonna be pissed when they learn about Bernie's wife's bank fraud investigation. Or the houses he bought with that money while campaigning on anti-capitalist corruption.
n/a western_red 2017-05-20
They act like they are doing "good" for Seth Rich, but not once have any of them considered the potential pain they are causing his family and friends. The whole thing is despicable.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
I've tried to say my points in other posts but there's so many of them.
I know people give the excuse that this is a conspiracy but until we got at least knowledge he was the leaker without KIMDOTCOM, I don't think it is a conspiracy. I'll fully entertain this if we knew Seth was the leaker. Because it seems much more likely it was a random act of violence and wikileaks got the emails through paid hackers.
n/a mconeone 2017-05-20
Covering up a murder. What's the sentence for that these days?
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
Hopefully a good amount of time.
Just get wikileaks to prove who gave them the emails and we can entertain Seth Rich conspiracy.
n/a gamedevresponder 2017-05-20
Kim DotCom tweeted that he "was involved" and that he can prove Seth was the leaker, so, eh...
Maybe you should join us trying to restore justice in the world?!
n/a paulie_purr 2017-05-20
Kim DotCom made a string of claims during the election that never amounted to anything. Ask yourself why he would suddenly claim it's true and he has proof now, now that the theory has been resurrected by a FULLY DEBUNKED Fox News-related episode.
The idea that Seth was the leak to WL has not been debunked, but the whole Monday drama has been, admittedly, by the same guy making that claim.
Kimdotcom is desperate for relevance, and simply promoting the theory.
n/a gamedevresponder 2017-05-20
No he isn't desperate for relevance, he has proof that Seth Rich was the leaker and is desperate for justice.
PROOF
Let's wait til Tuesday then, but that means Monday evening for you in Shareblue world
n/a Glassclose 2017-05-20
please tell us what else we're allowed to do, is CNN aware of this post?
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
Are you ever self aware?
n/a Glassclose 2017-05-20
says the guy trying to dictate what the internet can talk about.
n/a Drax_The_Destroyer 2017-05-20
That's because they are using the Seth Rich story the same way they used Pizzagate. This is a honey pot created to discredit this community. "Look at these evil conspiracy theorists invoking the name of this slain individual to support their agenda! We need to do something to stop this sort of thing!" And people take the bait every time this happens.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
I think they had to because there is a full blown leftist conspiracy theory that got a special counsel and everything. I wish I knew a place I could read more about it. It's almost like information is being suppressed. Anyway.
n/a Drax_The_Destroyer 2017-05-20
Don't look for any truth on this sub.
n/a mesqueunclubsandwich 2017-05-20
Nope, that's what flat earth is for
n/a walkalloveryou 2017-05-20
It is kind of evil to make assumptions about things you don't know based on the SPECULATIONS of strangers.
n/a paulie_purr 2017-05-20
There is a suspicious core to his death that affords pretty unstandable skepticism. However, the promotion of only one acceptable, very simplified theory leads me to believe the real effort here is to just spread the theory around, get as many people to believe it as possible, create reasonable doubt re: the Russian hack concept-- thus, it feels all the world like coordinated, seeded propaganda, like Pizzagate, Spirit Cooking, and in a way like Trump/Russia (although many, many people with their credibility on the line are involved in very real investigations there, which doesn't mean it's true, but is being taken vastly more seriously as a possibility).
Fully with you that proving Seth was the DNC leaker would open the door in a major way. So far, just claims.
And as I've said before: this has never felt like an effort to find out who killed Seth, more an effort to prove the DNC did it and exonerate all accusations against Putin's regime. Nobody's researching gang activity in DC, linking to the crime waves in and around his neighborhood, or considering any other tract besides the extremely political "Clinton Kill List" one.
n/a XDiabolusExMachinaX 2017-05-20
Thanks. I do strive to tell the truth with the information I've been given.