Anyone else around here just waiting here for kim dot com reveal?
144 2017-05-23 by JonBendini
Today's the day. I wonder if this is all just a lead up to some advertisement or will we really get some solid info? Care to share your thoughts?
144 2017-05-23 by JonBendini
Today's the day. I wonder if this is all just a lead up to some advertisement or will we really get some solid info? Care to share your thoughts?
108 comments
n/a bannanaflame 2017-05-23
I'm just looking forward to the last of Dotcom's credibility being destroyed. If he doesn't have actual proof there's no reason to pay any attention to him in future.
n/a JonBendini 2017-05-23
Does he bs a lot? I haven't really followed him.
n/a bannanaflame 2017-05-23
Yeah, biggest was when he suggested he had hillarys lost emails, announcement was basically "ask the NSA for them"
n/a GooseChaparro 2017-05-23
You're and idiot and what you say is not true. Kim.com forced NSA's hand. He did so by exposing exactly how it is possible to do and NSA has the means to do it. He's a hero and you're a rat-bastard.
n/a mastigia 2017-05-23
Removed rule 10
n/a mastigia 2017-05-23
I think he and Assange are buddies. There was some desperate blind chess being played at that time, and he was one of Assange's pieces, which he chose not to move.
n/a GooseChaparro 2017-05-23
Poor analysis leads to a fabricated line of thought. Kim.com forced NSA's hand. He did so by exposing exactly how it is possible to do and NSA has the means to do it. He's a hero and would do all well to look into it for themselves.
n/a mastigia 2017-05-23
If he comes through on this maybe I'll agree with you. Not overly optimistic though man.
n/a GooseChaparro 2017-05-23
Respect. If kim.com fails, then I'll come here and post my recant and agree with you in like fashion. Best luck to you and we'll see in several hours. ........... gulp........... :)
n/a _Alvin_Row_ 2017-05-23
Well?
n/a GooseChaparro 2017-05-23
I was right. Kim.com came through. https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/6cvypt/kim_dotcom_statement_on_seth_rich/
n/a AutoModerator 2017-05-23
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
n/a _Alvin_Row_ 2017-05-23
Lol no he didn't
n/a GooseChaparro 2017-05-23
lol. KIMDOTCOM IS THE PATH SETH RICH USED TO SECURELY GET THE EMAILS TO WIKILEAKS (FROM POL ANON, TRUST IN KIM & READ BETWEEN THE LINES)
n/a Soandthen 2017-05-23
How the fuck do you consider that coming through? He took the biggest copout possible filling knowing this will never happen. I hope they call him on his bluff.
n/a GooseChaparro 2017-05-23
If Kim.Com actually takes down the Democratic Party, I'll never stop laughing. at you.
It's unfortunate even with evidence in your face you cannot see it. #SAD.
n/a Soandthen 2017-05-23
And if he keeps giving excuses for not turning over "evidence" I'll continue to laugh at you.
n/a Soandthen 2017-05-23
Attempted to hack Rich's email, sounds like a trustworthy guy.
n/a SpongeBobSquarePants 2017-05-23
Or it could have been the fault of the dragons. Both your statement and mine have equal factual support.
n/a mastigia 2017-05-23
Now that you mention it, I didn't even consider dragons! September 23rd. is coming! How could I have been so blind.
n/a fuckthisfuckingworld 2017-05-23
There was no reason to take him seriously this time yet people did it anyway.
They will do the same the next time.
n/a SpongeBobSquarePants 2017-05-23
It's will not matter those that support him will still support him, I mean look at how many people still say Wikileaks always keeps their promises even when presented with evidence they don't.
The facts don't matter, what matters is they have someone to support, someone to latch onto.
n/a peckabuns 2017-05-23
I agree that Kim lost his credibility a long time ago but what promises did wikileaks not keep?
n/a wwwes32 2017-05-23
They promised that they were going to blow the entire Clinton campaign, that they had this extremely damaging evidence. It was nothing, but they got a lot of press for their anniversary celebration.
n/a peckabuns 2017-05-23
If I remember correctly they made a vague announcement and other people made a bunch of assumptions and hyped it up...but I have no doubt that was Wikileaks intention - but I think technically they didn't make any crazy claims, they were just vaguely deceptive in their marketing.
n/a JoePesciOfGoneFishin 2017-05-23
They also claimed to have information on Donald Trump but Julian didn't want to release it because it wasn't interesting enough or something.
n/a iVirtue 2017-05-23
The time they claimed they had damaging info on Russia to release but didn't
n/a SomeRandomGuydotdot 2017-05-23
Pretty sure that the Russian's just straight threatened to kill them if they did.
n/a iVirtue 2017-05-23
Well they did threaten them
n/a SomeRandomGuydotdot 2017-05-23
Wikileaks has managed to perform several large document dumps. The only one that I'm very, very disappointed about is when they didn't release the bank documents.
n/a PonyExpressYourself 2017-05-23
This the end of the line for KDC. Pony up or its over.
n/a piles_of_SSRIs 2017-05-23
There's no reason to pay attention to now, he knowingly housed a whole archive of other people's CP and never gave it a second thought until he was caught. If he delivers then that would be excellent but until then I still think he's a disgusting greasy ball of whale blubber.
n/a TheBlueBlaze 2017-05-23
As long as he panders to the people that want to believe that the other side is more corrupt than their own, he'll still exist. And if he goes away, someone or something else will take his place.
n/a a_trashcan 2017-05-23
Not only will he destroy his own credibility but probably that if the whole Seth Ritch story.
n/a ultimateown3r 2017-05-23
I'd love to be proven wrong... I don't think he will deliver. He just loves attention.
n/a itsjeremyson 2017-05-23
I'm still waiting for him to drop the Hillary documents he said he had during the election.
n/a cholera_or_gonorrhea 2017-05-23
Few people felt more blueballed than me when those didn't show up.
Technically, though, he said he knew the emails could be obtained by the NSA because they showed the capability of retrieving his, as came out in his court case.
n/a BooPiBooPi 2017-05-23
I think he was referencing what he knew Wikileaks was about to reveal. Back to the archives with you my friend. There is much research to be done
n/a _Alvin_Row_ 2017-05-23
That was his backtrack. He originally claimed he HAD the emails in his possession
n/a throwawaytreez 2017-05-23
shit or get off the pot
n/a PhunnelCake 2017-05-23
Tits or gtfo
n/a throwawaytreez 2017-05-23
If you like em hairy, I got u fam
n/a joe462 2017-05-23
I'm pretty sure I'm a sucker, but yeah, I wait in suspense.
n/a Rezasaurus 2017-05-23
Decorate times call for desperate measures, call me a sucker but I'll wait patiently daily!
n/a mki401 2017-05-23
"desperation" might as well be the motto for this recent Seth Rich resurgence lol
n/a QMS235 2017-05-23
He's putting Sean Hannitys credibility at risk. Sean really stuck his neck out for Kim on this one. He better pull through for us.
n/a joe462 2017-05-23
I'm reminded of the time Rachel Maddow hyped having Trump's taxes. I don't think anyone in the corporate media is above over-hyped nothing burgers.
n/a QMS235 2017-05-23
The only thing that makes me think it may be legit this time is that it's a big accusation to make, a political assassination is a massive deal. If I were Sean, I wouldn't have mentioned anything unless Kim explained to me personally what he had. After he didn't pull through multiple times before, Kim doesn't really have much credibility. However, I agree with your point and I'm leaning towards this being Abby ch of hoopla.
n/a dfu3568ete6 2017-05-23
He lost all his credibility when he didn't go through with getting waterboarded. We haven't forgotten, were all still waiting.
n/a QMS235 2017-05-23
We can tell you haven't forgotten, every time someone mentions Hannity someone brings up the waterboarding without fail. Tell me how him not following through on a personal promise indicates that his actual journalism is not credible. Sounds to me like he made a hasty comment and regretted it.
n/a dfu3568ete6 2017-05-23
What he did was called lying. Lying ruins your credibility. * ~The More You Know~ *
n/a QMS235 2017-05-23
Okokok, find me someone in public media that hasn't told one lie. The fact that this is the only reason people have to doubt his credibility, and they bring it up literally every time he's mentioned, actually reassures me. When he lies about something of substance, then I'll be more critical.
n/a BurninEpix 2017-05-23
I sang the little more you know jingle in my head when I read that haha
n/a SomeRandomGuydotdot 2017-05-23
Sounds to me like he's a fuckin' hack.
1) Water boarding has a history of being considered torture that dates back to WWII when it was performed against American's by the Japanese.
2) He never recanted his position; however, Christopher Hitchens, who made the same boast (Though followed through) immediately did.
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2008/08/hitchens200808
3) Tell me how him not following through on a personal promise indicates that his actual journalism is not credible.
His journalism wasn't not credible, it was biased and he was being an apologist for torture. His statement that waterboarding isn't torture, watch me go through it to prove it, is a statement that if a pussy journalist with no SERE training can undergo it, then clearly a soldier could be expected to undergo it. He then backed down, because guess what, getting tortured to make a point is the kind of thing that people with balls do, not errant wastes of oxygen like Sean Hannity.
n/a maximumhamburger 2017-05-23
Seriously, how is "he lied and failed to deliver on a promise while advocating for the government to torture people" not a valid reason to distrust him?
n/a SomeRandomGuydotdot 2017-05-23
You're allowed to lie.
A spokesman says, 'I love milk, milk is my favorite drink.' Really, he likes Hendricks and Tonic. That's a fine lie to tell.
Water boarding isn't torture. That's not the same kind of lie. It ended up getting repeated by right wing arm chair chicken hawks. Our military took responsibility for torture, they couldn't call it that for legal reasons, but they knew it was torture. Pretending like it wasn't torture shows he didn't understand what the lie was.
The actual lie was that it wasn't torture legally, no one was claiming that it wasn't torture in practice. So his crossing that line showed he just didn't get it.
n/a The_Phelan 2017-05-23
agreed
n/a IHateSherrod 2017-05-23
Hannity is a hack
n/a SuggestAPhotoProject 2017-05-23
ELI5?
n/a supapete 2017-05-23
Seth Rich supposedly contacted Kim Dotcom as well as Wikileaks. Wikileaks won't reveal sources. Kim says he has proof that Seth was the leaker and some damning documents that may not have reached Wikileaks.
I think I got that right.
n/a BustyBundle 2017-05-23
I'm very cautiously optimistic.
n/a TheDr_Dank 2017-05-23
He's bluffing. It's already 1:04 am tomorrow in New Zealand.... so are we waiting until Wednesday now?
n/a oneinfinitecreator 2017-05-23
To be fair, I think he's collaborating with Sean Hannity on this, so i'd imagine he would probably be on Sean's show today. KDC is smart enough to adjust for time zones, and he also knows his audience is in the USA and not in New Zealand... unless NZ is on a Seth Rich bender as well?
n/a wwwes32 2017-05-23
If Sean Hannity is hosting Kim, then he is killing his career. Kim is a pretty bad hombre.
n/a oneinfinitecreator 2017-05-23
How so?
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150326/18041530458/how-us-government-legally-stole-millions-kim-dotcom.shtml
n/a wwwes32 2017-05-23
Oh, poor baby got his stuff taken away. Gee, that seems like he had a lot of money, wonder how he got it.
n/a oneinfinitecreator 2017-05-23
devolving to insult narratives now? Have a good day at work friend
n/a mki401 2017-05-23
I'm here to see what excuses t_D churns up when Kim delivers absolutely nothing
n/a mki401 2017-05-23
Lol it's already Wed in New Zealand
n/a mastigia 2017-05-23
Not just waiting for that. But it's on my list of hopeful possibilities. I'm of the mind that he is the kid with the stock and an ant hill. He has chickened out every other time, but looks like Assange gave him the go ahead this time. I'm giving it a 50/50 chance.
n/a StanleyKubricksPenis 2017-05-23
Isn't it Wednesday over in NZ? This is already nothing. People, please don't waste you time with this attention whore. I would love to be wrong though.
n/a AbortionBurger 2017-05-23
He tweeted yesterday "kim.com < tomorow." so I suppose we will see.
n/a Spartan1117 2017-05-23
Is tuesday the day comey testifies?
n/a Ninjakick666 2017-05-23
I think Chaffetz tweeted last night that the Comey thing got rescheduled... good cause I sound like an old man when I go off on a rant about why CSPAN, CSPAN2 and CSPAN3 are all like 50 channels apart from each other... like... why not just have em consecutively?
n/a -SPIRITUAL-GANGSTER- 2017-05-23
I'm personally really fucking tired of the whole, "I've got the goods, but I'll release them at a later date muahahaha," spiel. And I'm not just referring to Kim Dotcom, I'm also talking about Glenn Greenwald, Wikileaks, etc. If you've got it, dump it, or shut the fuck up.
n/a Somuchpepe 2017-05-23
True that, all its doing is pining for attention and wafting valuable time getting to the truth and justice. It doesn't serve the victims of these crimes at all.
n/a oneinfinitecreator 2017-05-23
Just wait for KDC to actually do something before you get all angst-y about it. KDC only delayed because he was getting sworn depositions recorded with his lawyers present and all the legal channels covered. Remember that KDC is facing extradition to the US as we speak, so his lawyers are actually used to taking on the US Justice Department. He knows how to do this properly, and i'd rather him get his ducks in a row than just make some stupid 4Chan post.
If he's released nothing by tomorrow with no reasoning or excuse, I can understand being upset about this, but the timeline hasn't even come to fruition yet. Calm down and be patient!
We saw what happened to Manning and others who 'just dumped it' and they got arrested and pseudo-tortured for like 7 years. Greenwald would get the same treatment in a second, and then we have one less good journalist out there willing to tell 'the other side'.
Why don't you feel these people should protect themselves? KDC waited for a fever pitch on Seth Rich before coming forward so that this couldn't be distracted from as easily. If he produces something of value, it was a very smart strategy.
n/a PopeInnocentIX 2017-05-23
Why didn't he get his ducks in a row with the lawyers before making the announcement?
n/a FlyinPenguin 2017-05-23
Yeah true. Made sense for a while during primaries and the election to hold off. But not now-- dump it or stfu.
n/a Ninjakick666 2017-05-23
Yeah... if he is selling a book or something it is gonna be shitty... At least while I wait the State Dept just dropped like 250+ HRC emails this morning... looks like I'm gonna finish going thru em before I finish my first cup of coffee though... it's just a big slog of WJC schedules all redacted to high hell...
https://foia.state.gov/search/results.aspx
I'll still sift thru em all to see if there are any pearls, but those State Dept. wonks always edit out the interesting stuff.... but at least I got something to do while I wait... Maybe I should check on the FBI Vault too... nope... nothing... but it's a little early in the AM for the FBI to drop anything...
https://vault.fbi.gov/recently-added
n/a Project_Conscious 2017-05-23
Ya'll deserve to be suckered after not learning your lesson the last time - he's a fat F attention whore; i wouldnt be surprised if he possibly even has ties to intelligence
n/a Cripplor 2017-05-23
You'll be waiting until you draw your last breath, because there won't be any reveal.
Kim Dotcom has nothing but an inflated sense of self-importance and billions of dollars with which he tries to buy NZ politicians to keep him out of prison.
n/a yodaballs 2017-05-23
Fat fuck better deliver
n/a FuckMeBernie 2017-05-23
Stop holding your breath on this. He promised big reveals multiple times without delivering. If it happens then it happens but I wouldn't be surprised if he just didn't deliver anything.
n/a favoritecattoy 2017-05-23
Dot com can't be a real last name. Ever think of that?
n/a megalodon90 2017-05-23
Pretty sure he changed it after he became mega rich from megaupload.
n/a favoritecattoy 2017-05-23
Plus you need at least two for a conspiracy, right?
n/a megalodon90 2017-05-23
Uh, this ties into the Seth Rich event. Not sure what you mean.
n/a favoritecattoy 2017-05-23
Me neither
n/a megalodon90 2017-05-23
Kim Dotcom claims to be dropping bombshell evidence in the Seth Rich case today which, if you've been following this sub at all, you know has a plethora of conspiracy theories involved in it. Saying this post isn't a conspiracy because it's only about one guy is entirely ignoring context and doesn't make any sense.
n/a favoritecattoy 2017-05-23
I know
n/a megalodon90 2017-05-23
Then I don't understand what you were trying to say with your earlier comment.
n/a favoritecattoy 2017-05-23
oh well?
n/a rmwe 2017-05-23
Its Wednesday in new Zealand already, Kim said hed make his announcement Tuesday.
n/a JeanLucPicardAND 2017-05-23
I bet he's gonna reveal a bag of Cheetos he found underneath one of his fat rolls.
Look. Forgive my sarcasm, but the guy is a proven attention whore. He has done this sort of thing before. I'm not holding my breath.
If it's legit, it's legit, and we go from there.
But I'm not holding my breath.
n/a Bruuus 2017-05-23
I can't be let down again. However, I have faith in Kimdotcom. Mr. Com, please, please take the torch from Rich and Assange. DO IT.
n/a fatcyst2020 2017-05-23
Why? Sincere question. Why do you have faith in this guy? I don't know much about him.
n/a Bruuus 2017-05-23
I don't know much about him either. But I would find it strange if Kim wanted try to make a cheap buck off of some guy's murder. Then again, I don't know him. But claiming to know a dead guy to make some money during one of the most heated murder cases in U.S. history would be pretty messed up. I've been let down by many people like James O'keefe, but I have a feeling that kimdotcom might save us all at the last moment.
We'll just have to see. I hope I'm right.
RipSethRich.
n/a service_account 2017-05-23
Just tweeted that the release will be soon... @11:35EST
https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/867040994516008960
n/a Kodos_Voter 2017-05-23
https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/867040994516008960
n/a MaskUnderMask 2017-05-23
Posted 13mins ago... "Soon™" https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/867040994516008960
n/a Wh0rse 2017-05-23
He'll reveal his fat arse.
n/a Armaedus 2017-05-23
There's people holding their breath for sure, waiting on this "info". By days end, there will be lots of people dead from self inflicted suffocation.
KDC doesn't have any information on anything. He's irrelevant, and it's killing him. So he trolls stupid people on twitter for attention.
n/a Hinckapuss 2017-05-23
Yes. Dying to go out and get my food planted under today's chemtrail haze but I can't. Stop. Checking http://kim.com/
n/a Fat_Dumb_American 2017-05-23
here it is:
n/a trundalthegreat 2017-05-23
I hope this kim dot com claim is legitimate.
n/a ecoJamesbond 2017-05-23
It was very underwhelming.
n/a Aloud-Aloud 2017-05-23
Killing time by going over the DNC lawsuit.
Question:
Bruce Spiva (lawyer for the DNC) argued ... the party holds the right to select its candidate any way it chooses and is not bound by pledges of fairness.
Surely you'd seek a statement confirming this as common knowledge from the DNC's 2 biggest losers from 2016: Bernie Sanders and Tulsi Gabbard?
We all know Bernie got screwed, was he ok with that? I thought he changed affiliations so he COULD challenge Clinton for the leadership role?
And did Rep Gabbard know that she was committing career suicide by dropping out of the Vice-Chair DNC position to support Bernie's run, in late February?
n/a threwahway 2017-05-23
Haha how do you all feel? You've been conned. AGAIN. how many times will you spite yourself on these shitty politicians and baseless accusations? 4d chess rofl.
n/a CogitatorX 2017-05-23
Like all big "reveals" on this sub it's going to be a long wait.
n/a SerbianJewHam 2017-05-23
When was the last time some one said "I have amazing information and I will release it on day X" and it not be a total let down? Even if information is released, it's not the kind that actually changes anything. It's always either nothing gets released or something gets released and it's totally worthless.
Kim.com is just an attention whore. Why is anyone even talking about him?
n/a hotdogsfromchicago 2017-05-23
Nope, why wait for a con artist?
n/a GooseChaparro 2017-05-23
You're and idiot and what you say is not true. Kim.com forced NSA's hand. He did so by exposing exactly how it is possible to do and NSA has the means to do it. He's a hero and you're a rat-bastard.
n/a mastigia 2017-05-23
I think he and Assange are buddies. There was some desperate blind chess being played at that time, and he was one of Assange's pieces, which he chose not to move.
n/a joe462 2017-05-23
I'm reminded of the time Rachel Maddow hyped having Trump's taxes. I don't think anyone in the corporate media is above over-hyped nothing burgers.
n/a QMS235 2017-05-23
The only thing that makes me think it may be legit this time is that it's a big accusation to make, a political assassination is a massive deal. If I were Sean, I wouldn't have mentioned anything unless Kim explained to me personally what he had. After he didn't pull through multiple times before, Kim doesn't really have much credibility. However, I agree with your point and I'm leaning towards this being Abby ch of hoopla.
n/a dfu3568ete6 2017-05-23
He lost all his credibility when he didn't go through with getting waterboarded. We haven't forgotten, were all still waiting.
n/a The_Phelan 2017-05-23
agreed
n/a PopeInnocentIX 2017-05-23
Why didn't he get his ducks in a row with the lawyers before making the announcement?
n/a IHateSherrod 2017-05-23
Hannity is a hack