I don't believe in the idea that we have had contact with aliens but I love reading about it. It's fun to entertain the thought and hear people's theories. And I don't rule out the possibility that aliens exist out there somewhere. It's just very unlikely to me that there would be any who have reached us or even have the ability to do so.
I believe there would be more obvious signs if it were a previews civilization. Why would it be in such a remote area with no ancient roads or other buildings. It's so large we couldn't replicate it with the tech it takes to "stain" the earth so evenly done and straight.
The ancient civilization that is being considered to have existed would have been destroyed 10 to 12 thousand years ago. So there isn't much evidence, modern humans are developing better tools to search with and identify what does remain, like those nice satellite photos from high resolution cameras used for the photos in your article.
this is obviously a fake airfield used to train pilots. If you examine closely around the airfield looking areas you will see many craters from bombs, and fake buildings and airplanes for targets. Sorry but they are just blowing shit up out here.
these are remnants of a previous advanced civilization on earth
I had heard that this structure was built by the Chinese to calibrate their satellites, which makes sense, but when you zoom in on it you can clearly see it has massive depth to it as well. Like 100+ feet of concrete tall.
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I was trying to say that with all the sand and stuff covering the structure it appears that it has been there for at least 10,000+ years. All the stuff covering it would not cover it if it had been built 10 years ago.
If there would have been a global advanced civilisation we wouldn't only see isolated remnants. To me it makes more sense to assume that what we see are remnants from an outpost, a colony of sort which matches with underwater structures hinting at large scale digging operations.
Technological requirements for some unbelievable stonework even in todays ages and the lack of evidence for a global wide spread advanced civilization. Just imagine today with just a few high centers of civilzation and nothing significant inbetween. Does that make sense from a natural growth perspective?
Look into countries in Europe with thousand years of civilization and you see a close network of village, cities, country and state capitals.
European "civilization," what was there before 500 AD for structures except what the Romans had built and I think Stonehenge is older than the given date.
Yes and I tried to explain how a civilization would look like on a global scale which developed naturally. It would not just consist of a few centers, the remnants we see today and wonder how they managed the stonework. Because we only recognize a few locations I think it looks more like a colony with a few bases in areas they are interested in.
There are those pyramids all over the earth except North America and Northern EU. And there are those unexplainable artifacts, again, excepting North America and Northern EU and some think the asteroid or comment or ? that may have hit the earth at that time would have hit a 2 mile deep layer of ice so that would indicate not much civilization going on but there are some very old structures in Mexico, Central and South America, the Balkan region of EU, and Asia.
33 comments
n/a Another-Chance 2017-05-27
Upvoted because aliens.
n/a bubbajojebjo 2017-05-27
Upvoted because upvotes because aliens.
n/a KickedinTheDick 2017-05-27
Didnt vote because I dont believe in aliens but Id hate to put a damper on things
n/a bubbajojebjo 2017-05-27
I'll give you an upvote for honesty! Honesty over all!
n/a anthrolooksee 2017-05-27
Upvote for supporting honesty and differing opinions!
n/a PandesaurusRex 2017-05-27
Upvote for positively reinforcing positive reinforcement
n/a Ickyfist 2017-05-27
I don't believe in the idea that we have had contact with aliens but I love reading about it. It's fun to entertain the thought and hear people's theories. And I don't rule out the possibility that aliens exist out there somewhere. It's just very unlikely to me that there would be any who have reached us or even have the ability to do so.
n/a KickedinTheDick 2017-05-27
This is pretty much my belief. Like, sure, theres probably some out there, but have any contacted us or lived here? Doubtful
n/a DestroyBabylonSystem 2017-05-27
..........but your name is KickedinTheDick so I don't think anyone would hold it against you ; )..........
n/a dumnut567 2017-05-27
Upvoted because something other than a political scandal
n/a Stevo182 2017-05-27
Come on over to the alien theory sub. Fewer subscribers than UFO, but arguable more substantial content.
n/a GoddessWins 2017-05-27
I lean to thinking these are remnants of a previous advanced civilization on earth, not remnants of alien occupation.
n/a 52NUKE 2017-05-27
I believe there would be more obvious signs if it were a previews civilization. Why would it be in such a remote area with no ancient roads or other buildings. It's so large we couldn't replicate it with the tech it takes to "stain" the earth so evenly done and straight.
n/a GoddessWins 2017-05-27
The ancient civilization that is being considered to have existed would have been destroyed 10 to 12 thousand years ago. So there isn't much evidence, modern humans are developing better tools to search with and identify what does remain, like those nice satellite photos from high resolution cameras used for the photos in your article.
n/a Georex 2017-05-27
this is obviously a fake airfield used to train pilots. If you examine closely around the airfield looking areas you will see many craters from bombs, and fake buildings and airplanes for targets. Sorry but they are just blowing shit up out here.
n/a Homer_Simpson_Doh 2017-05-27
I had heard that this structure was built by the Chinese to calibrate their satellites, which makes sense, but when you zoom in on it you can clearly see it has massive depth to it as well. Like 100+ feet of concrete tall.
The land has covered part of the structure with mountains, hills, and sand dunes. Stuff that doesn't appear overnight.
n/a GoddessWins 2017-05-27
I did say a civilization from 10 to 12 thousand years ago, I don't think anyone can call that overnight.
n/a Homer_Simpson_Doh 2017-05-27
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I was trying to say that with all the sand and stuff covering the structure it appears that it has been there for at least 10,000+ years. All the stuff covering it would not cover it if it had been built 10 years ago.
n/a nisaaru 2017-05-27
If there would have been a global advanced civilisation we wouldn't only see isolated remnants. To me it makes more sense to assume that what we see are remnants from an outpost, a colony of sort which matches with underwater structures hinting at large scale digging operations.
n/a CaptainApollyon 2017-05-27
we see so much more than remnants. Any material can and does turn to stone so don't expect to find a circuit boards or metal equipment.
http://megaliths.org/
n/a GoddessWins 2017-05-27
And what do you have to base your claims about an ancient alien invasion that left the remnants of massive structures?
n/a nisaaru 2017-05-27
Technological requirements for some unbelievable stonework even in todays ages and the lack of evidence for a global wide spread advanced civilization. Just imagine today with just a few high centers of civilzation and nothing significant inbetween. Does that make sense from a natural growth perspective?
Look into countries in Europe with thousand years of civilization and you see a close network of village, cities, country and state capitals.
n/a GoddessWins 2017-05-27
European "civilization," what was there before 500 AD for structures except what the Romans had built and I think Stonehenge is older than the given date.
n/a nisaaru 2017-05-27
The point was about natural growth of the structure.
n/a GoddessWins 2017-05-27
I think our original points were, you think they are Alien constructions and I think they are ancient earth civilization.
n/a nisaaru 2017-05-27
Yes and I tried to explain how a civilization would look like on a global scale which developed naturally. It would not just consist of a few centers, the remnants we see today and wonder how they managed the stonework. Because we only recognize a few locations I think it looks more like a colony with a few bases in areas they are interested in.
n/a GoddessWins 2017-05-27
There are those pyramids all over the earth except North America and Northern EU. And there are those unexplainable artifacts, again, excepting North America and Northern EU and some think the asteroid or comment or ? that may have hit the earth at that time would have hit a 2 mile deep layer of ice so that would indicate not much civilization going on but there are some very old structures in Mexico, Central and South America, the Balkan region of EU, and Asia.
n/a T-D-S 2017-05-27
all i see is a confirmed missile test site
n/a EpithalonQT 2017-05-27
These are human missile testing sites and similar things, run by the Chinese government. Seriously, this topic has been resolved years ago.
n/a FaJiTa-SalesmeN 2017-05-27
True, but isn't interesting satellite imagery a nice change from political astroturfing?
n/a Pipe13omb 2017-05-27
I remember reading that rectangle thing is used to sync up satellites.
n/a Georex 2017-05-27
There are craters everywhere that look like they are from bombs. Definetly seems like a testing/training area for pilots and stuff
n/a 33spacecowboys 2017-05-27
Radar dumps. There for adjusting radar on planes and missiles to have accurate local positions to triangulate.
n/a PandesaurusRex 2017-05-27
Upvote for positively reinforcing positive reinforcement